working at the science & policy interface

11
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Working at the science & Policy interface Panos Panagos European Commision – Joint Research Centre, Ispra, ITALY https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

Upload: others

Post on 09-Apr-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Working at the science & Policy interface

www.jrc.ec.europa.eu

Serving society

Stimulating innovation

Supporting legislation

Working at the science & Policy interface

Panos Panagos

European Commision – Joint Research Centre,

Ispra, ITALY

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

Page 2: Working at the science & Policy interface

Established 1957

DG of European Commission

6 institutes in 5 countries

3,068 staff (35% short-term)

751 peer-reviewed scientificpublications in 2015

Scientific / Technical support to policy makers

Independent of national or private interests

Joint Research Centre

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

Page 3: Working at the science & Policy interface

Shreeharsh Kelkar, MIT, 2014

Page 4: Working at the science & Policy interface

Scientific support to the whole policy cycle

Independent verification

Measurements

Technical guidance

Anti-fraud measures

Impact assessment

(Environment, Economic, Social)

Policy formulation

Decision-making

process

Policy adoption

Evaluation of

effectiveness and

efficiency

Policy evaluation

Crisis response

Ad-hoc policy

support

JRC

Agenda-setting

Identification of

emerging issues

Policy anticipation

Policy

implementation

Page 5: Working at the science & Policy interface

Framework

Within EU policymaking

Context

TRUST

TIMING

Form

FORMATEvidence to

Inform POLICY

Page 6: Working at the science & Policy interface

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/books/a-z-guide-to-joint-research-centre

DG JRC supports almost all policies

• Agriculture and food security

• Economic and Monetary Union

• Energy and transport

• Environment and climate change

• Health and consumer protection

• Information society

• Innovation and growth

• Nuclear safety and security

• Safety and security

• Standards

Page 7: Working at the science & Policy interface

• Policy (urgent) request: What are the levels in banks’ capitals for a stable financial system in EU?

• JRC provided scientific validationfor proposed rules (Running models for Macro-economic analysis).

• Inter-disciplinary team of Economists, Mathematicians, Statisticians, etc….

“Result: EU regulations on how banks contribute to Resolution funds”

Policy formulation: Banking Union

Page 8: Working at the science & Policy interface

Policy monitoring & implementation: Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)

• Average EU-28: 2.46 t ha-1 yr-1 (in the erosive prone areas: 91% of EU)

• Total Soil loss: 970 Mt annually

• 24% of EU lands have rates >2 t/ha

• 11% of total area contributes to almost 70% of total Soil Loss

“Between 2000 and 2010, intervention measures through the CAP have reduced the rate of soil erosion by an average of 20% for arable lands”

“Reducing soil erosion is important for reducing carbon emissions (climate change)”

Panagos, et al 2015. NATURE.

Panagos et al (2015) – Environmental Science & Policy

Lugato et al (2016) Global Change Biology

Soil loss by water erosion

Page 9: Working at the science & Policy interface

Uncertainties / validation in our research

9/22

Page 10: Working at the science & Policy interface

Stone Walls

Grass margins

Contour farming

Reduced Tillage

Plant residues

Cover crops

Good Agricultural practices against Erosion

Panagos et al (2015) – Land use policy

Page 11: Working at the science & Policy interface

Why JRC can play the role of science to policy interface?

• Inter-disciplinary teams with high competences

• Scientific soundness

• Cross policy: Knowing decision making process & policy developments

• Context: Scientists should understand policy questions

• Continuity: Framework programme

• Engagement with stakeholders: Result of long-term collaborations

• Harmonisation: taking into account the geographical differences

• Independent of Member States interests

• Trust in collaboration & Networking development