wordfile of q.25

8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25

1/17

Frequency Table

internet facility

8 8.0 8.0 8.0

3 3.0 3.0 11.0

7 7.0 7.0 18.0

9 9.0 9.0 27.0

8 8.0 8.0 35.0

4 4.0 4.0 39.0

6 6.0 6.0 45.0

8 8.0 8.0 53.0

13 13.0 13.0 66.0

6 6.0 6.0 72.0

9 9.0 9.0 81.0

7 7.0 7.0 88.0

8 8.0 8.0 96.0

4 4.0 4.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st Rank

2nd Rank

3rd Rank

4th Rank

5th Rank

th Rank

7th Rank

8th Rank

9th Rank

10th Rank

11th Rank

12th Rank

14th Rank

16th Rank

Total

ValidFrequenc !ercent Valid !ercent

"u#ulati$e

!ercent

internet %acilit

16th Rank

14th Rank

12th Rank

11th Rank

10th Rank

9th Rank

8th Rank

7th Rank

th Rank

5th Rank

4th Rank

3rd Rank

2nd Rank

1st Rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they

gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (8%), 2ndrank (%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (#%),

$thrank (8%), thrank ("%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (8%), #thrank (1%), 10thrank (%),

11thrank (#%), 12thrank (!%), 1"thrank ( 8%), 1thrank ("%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave "thrank to internet facility.


2/17

Digital facility

3 3.0 3.0 3.0

7 7.0 7.0 10.0

5 5.0 5.0 15.0

13 13.0 13.0 28.0

15 15.0 15.0 43.0

10 10.0 10.0 53.0

2 2.0 2.0 55.0

9 9.0 9.0 64.0

11 11.0 11.0 75.0

3 3.0 3.0 78.0

2 2.0 2.0 80.0

3 3.0 3.0 83.0

7 7.0 7.0 90.0

2 2.0 2.0 92.0

8 8.0 8.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st Rank

2nd Rank

3rd Rank

4th Rank

5th Rank

6th Rank

7th Rank

8th Rank

9th Rank

10th Rank

11th Rank

12th rank

13th Rank

14 th rank

15th rank

Total

Valid

Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent

"u#ulati$e

!ercent

&i'ital %acilit

15th rank

14 th rank

13th Rank

12th rank

11th Rank

10th Rank

9th Rank

8th Rank

7th Rank 6th Rank

5th Rank

4th Rank

3rd Rank

2nd Rank

1st Rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank (!%), rdrank ($%), "thrank (1%),

$thrank (1$%), thrank (10%), !thrank (2%), 8thrank (#%), #thrank (11%), 10thrank

(%), 11thrank (2%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank (!%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (8%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave "thrank to digital facility.


3/17

more specialization

4 4.0 4.0 4.0

2 2.0 2.0 6.0

7 7.0 7.0 13.0

6 6.0 6.0 19.0

14 14.0 14.0 33.0

11 11.0 11.0 44.0

13 13.0 13.0 57.0

6 6.0 6.0 63.0

10 10.0 10.0 73.0

19 19.0 19.0 92.0

3 3.0 3.0 95.0

2 2.0 2.0 97.0

3 3.0 3.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

13th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

#ore s(eciali)ation

16th rank

15th rank

13th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, theygave ranks to internet facility, 1strank ("%), 2ndrank (2%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (%),

$thrank (1"%), thrank (11%), !thrank (1%), #thrank (%), 10thrank (10%), 11thrank

(1#%), 1thrank (%), 1$thrank (2%), 1thrank (%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave $thrank to more specialiation.


4/17

place or city

11 11.0 11.0 11.0

5 5.0 5.0 16.0

15 15.0 15.0 31.0

10 10.0 10.0 41.0

8 8.0 8.0 49.0

5 5.0 5.0 54.0

4 4.0 4.0 58.0

14 14.0 14.0 72.0

6 6.0 6.0 78.0

9 9.0 9.0 87.0

3 3.0 3.0 90.0

5 5.0 5.0 95.0

4 4.0 4.0 99.0

1 1.0 1.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

(lace or cit

16th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (11%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (1$%), "thrank(10%), $thrank (8%), thrank ($%), !thrank ("%), 8thrank (1"%), #thrank (%), 10thrank

(#%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( "%), 1thrank (1%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave rdrank to *lace or city.


5/17

placements

12 12.0 12.0 12.0

29 29.0 29.0 41.0

7 7.0 7.0 48.0

2 2.0 2.0 50.0

6 6.0 6.0 56.0

14 14.0 14.0 70.0

6 6.0 6.0 76.0

7 7.0 7.0 83.0

1 1.0 1.0 84.0

3 3.0 3.0 87.0

4 4.0 4.0 91.0

4 4.0 4.0 95.0

2 2.0 2.0 97.0

3 3.0 3.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

(lace#ents

16th rank

15th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (12%), 2ndrank (2#%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (2%),$thrank (%), thrank (1"%), !thrank (%), #thrank (!%), 10thrank (1%), 11thrank (%),

12thrank ("%), 1thrank ("%), 1$thrank ( 2%), 1thrank (%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 2nd rank to *lacements.


6/17

university

12 12.0 12.0 12.0

13 13.0 13.0 25.0

7 7.0 7.0 32.0

11 11.0 11.0 43.0

12 12.0 12.0 55.0

8 8.0 8.0 63.0

10 10.0 10.0 73.0

3 3.0 3.0 76.0

2 2.0 2.0 78.0

13 13.0 13.0 91.0

2 2.0 2.0 93.0

4 4.0 4.0 97.0

2 2.0 2.0 99.0

1 1.0 1.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

12th rank

13th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

uni$ersit

16th rank

15th rank

13th rank

12th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (12%), 2ndrank (1%), rdrank (!%), "thrank(11%), $thrank (12%), thrank (8%), !thrank (10%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (2%), 10th

rank (1%), 12thrank (2%), 1thrank ("%), 1$thrank ( 2%), 1thrank (1%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 2ndand 10thrank to university.


7/17

fee structure

6 6.0 6.0 6.0

9 9.0 9.0 15.0

13 13.0 13.0 28.0

10 10.0 10.0 38.0

6 6.0 6.0 44.0

7 7.0 7.0 51.0

14 14.0 14.0 65.0

2 2.0 2.0 67.0

12 12.0 12.0 79.0

6 6.0 6.0 85.0

9 9.0 9.0 94.0

1 1.0 1.0 95.0

2 2.0 2.0 97.0

3 3.0 3.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

14th rank

15th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

%ee structure

15th rank

14th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank (#%), rdrank (1%), "thrank (10%),$thrank (%), thrank (!%), !thrank (1"%), 8thrank (2%), #thrank (12%), 10thrank (%),

11thrank (#%), 12thrank (1%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave !thrank toffee structure.


8/17

infrastructure

2 2.0 2.0 2.0

10 10.0 10.0 12.0

9 9.0 9.0 21.0

11 11.0 11.0 32.0

11 11.0 11.0 43.0

14 14.0 14.0 57.0

7 7.0 7.0 64.0

6 6.0 6.0 70.0

7 7.0 7.0 77.0

3 3.0 3.0 80.0

6 6.0 6.0 86.0

2 2.0 2.0 88.0

7 7.0 7.0 95.0

5 5.0 5.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

in%rastructure

16th rank

15th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank (10%), "thrank (#%), $thrank(11%), thrank (11%), !thrank (1"%), 8thrank (!%), #thrank (%), 10thrank (!%), 11th

rank (%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank (2%), 1$thrank ( !%), 1thrank ($%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave !thrank to infrastructure.


9/17

faculty

28 28.0 28.0 28.0

5 5.0 5.0 33.0

4 4.0 4.0 37.0

8 8.0 8.0 45.0

4 4.0 4.0 49.0

10 10.0 10.0 59.0

10 10.0 10.0 69.0

2 2.0 2.0 71.0

9 9.0 9.0 80.0

3 3.0 3.0 83.0

1 1.0 1.0 84.0

8 8.0 8.0 92.0

3 3.0 3.0 95.0

3 3.0 3.0 98.0

2 2.0 2.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1th rank

2th rank

3th rank

4th rank

5th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

%acult

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank5th rank

4th rank

3th rank

2th rank

1th rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (28%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank ("%), "thrank (8%),

$thrank ("%), !thrank (10%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (2%), 10thrank (#%), 11thrank

(%), 12thrank (1%), 1thrank (8%), 1thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%), 1thrank (2%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1st rank to faculty.


10/17

collegereputation

6 6.0 6.0 6.0

5 5.0 5.0 11.0

7 7.0 7.0 18.0

4 4.0 4.0 22.0

2 2.0 2.0 24.0

13 13.0 13.0 37.0

3 3.0 3.0 40.0

10 10.0 10.0 50.0

2 2.0 2.0 52.0

8 8.0 8.0 60.0

4 4.0 4.0 64.0

7 7.0 7.0 71.0

5 5.0 5.0 76.0

6 6.0 6.0 82.0

11 11.0 11.0 93.0

7 7.0 7.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1th rank

2th rank

3th rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

colle'ere(utation

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3th rank

2th rank

1th rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (!%), "thrank ("%),

$thrank (2%), thrank (1%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (2%), 10thrank (8%),11thrank ("%), 12thrank (!%), 1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( %), 1$thrank (11%), 1thrank

(!%)&&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1$thrank to college reputation.


11/17

extracurricularactivities

2 2.0 2.0 2.0

3 3.0 3.0 5.0

2 2.0 2.0 7.0

4 4.0 4.0 11.0

4 4.0 4.0 15.0

2 2.0 2.0 17.0

10 10.0 10.0 27.0

9 9.0 9.0 36.0

6 6.0 6.0 42.0

7 7.0 7.0 49.0

15 15.0 15.0 64.0

12 12.0 12.0 76.0

12 12.0 12.0 88.0

12 12.0 12.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

2th rank

3th rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

e*tracurricularacti$ities

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank 11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3th rank

2th rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 2ndrank (2%), rdrank (%), "thrank (2%), $thrank ("%),thrank ("%), !thrank (2%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (#%), 10thrank (%), 11thrank (!%),

12thrank (1$%), 1thrank (12%), 1"thrank ( 12%), 1$thrank (12%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1"th and 1$th rank to e+tracurricular activities.


12/17

playground

5 5.0 5.0 5.0

2 2.0 2.0 7.0

6 6.0 6.0 13.0

3 3.0 3.0 16.0

7 7.0 7.0 23.0

8 8.0 8.0 31.0

8 8.0 8.0 39.0

19 19.0 19.0 58.0

12 12.0 12.0 70.0

15 15.0 15.0 85.0

15 15.0 15.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

4th rank

6th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

(la'round

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank

6th rank

4th rank


gave ranks to internet facility, "thrank ($%), thrank (2%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (%),

10thrank (!%), 11thrank (8%), 12thrank (8%), 1thrank (1#%), 1"thrank (12%), 1$thrank

(1$%), 1thrank (1$%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1thrank to playground.


13/17

canteen

2 2.0 2.0 2.0

1 1.0 1.0 3.0

4 4.0 4.0 7.0

2 2.0 2.0 9.0

5 5.0 5.0 14.0

5 5.0 5.0 19.0

7 7.0 7.0 26.0

6 6.0 6.0 32.0

10 10.0 10.0 42.0

8 8.0 8.0 50.0

26 26.0 26.0 76.0

6 6.0 6.0 82.0

18 18.0 18.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

6th rank

7th rank

9th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

canteen

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

9th rank

7th rank

6th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank (1%), rdrank ("%), thrank (2%),

!thrank ($%), 8thrank ($%), #thrank (!%), 10thrank (!%), 11thrank (%), 12thrank(10%), 1thrank (8%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%), 1thrank (18%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1"thrank to canteen.


14/17

hostel facility

7 7.0 7.0 7.0

3 3.0 3.0 10.0

1 1.0 1.0 11.0

4 4.0 4.0 15.0

2 2.0 2.0 17.0

8 8.0 8.0 25.0

9 9.0 9.0 34.0

4 4.0 4.0 38.0

9 9.0 9.0 47.0

11 11.0 11.0 58.0

4 4.0 4.0 62.0

21 21.0 21.0 83.0

17 17.0 17.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

8th rank

10th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

hostel %acilit

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank12th rank

11th rank

10th rank

8th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (!%), 2ndrank (%), rdrank (1%), "thrank ("%),

$thrank (2%), 8thrank (8%), #thrank (#%), 10thrank (#%), 11thrank ("%), 12thrank (#%),1thrank (11%), 1"thrank ( "%), 1$thrank (21%), 1thrank (1!%)&&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1$thrank to hostel facility.


15/17

brand of the college

6 6.0 6.0 6.0

12 12.0 12.0 18.0

8 8.0 8.0 26.0

2 2.0 2.0 28.0

4 4.0 4.0 32.0

8 8.0 8.0 40.0

3 3.0 3.0 43.0

13 13.0 13.0 56.0

1 1.0 1.0 57.0

18 18.0 18.0 75.0

5 5.0 5.0 80.0

3 3.0 3.0 83.0

5 5.0 5.0 88.0

12 12.0 12.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

2nd rank

3rd rank

4th rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

9th rank

10thn rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

+rand o% the colle'e

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank

10thn rank

9th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

4th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank


gave ranks to internet facility, 2ndrank (%), rdrank (12%), "thrank (8%), $thrank (2%),thrank ("%), !thrank (8%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (1%), 10thrank (18%), 12thrank ($%),

1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( %), 1$thrank ($%), 1thrank (&12%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 10thrank to brand of the college.


16/17

foreign tour or local visit by flight

2 2.0 2.0 2.0

5 5.0 5.0 7.0

6 6.0 6.0 13.0

4 4.0 4.0 17.0

6 6.0 6.0 23.0

3 3.0 3.0 26.0

11 11.0 11.0 37.0

15 15.0 15.0 52.0

6 6.0 6.0 58.0

7 7.0 7.0 65.0

20 20.0 20.0 85.0

3 3.0 3.0 88.0

12 12.0 12.0 100.0

100 100.0 100.0

1st rank

2nd rank

3rd rank

5th rank

6th rank

7th rank

8th rank

11th rank

12th rank

13th rank

14th rank

15th rank

16th rank

Total

Valid


"u#ulati$e

!ercent

%orei'n tour or local $isit + %li'ht

16th rank

15th rank

14th rank

13th rank

12th rank 11th rank

8th rank

7th rank

6th rank

5th rank

3rd rank

2nd rank

1st rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, theygave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (%), $thrank ("%),

thrank (%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (11%), 11thrank (1$%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank

(!%), 1"

th

rank ( 20%), 1$

th

rank (%), 1

th

rank (12%)&

Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 20thrank to foreign tour or local visit by

flight&a.


17/17

wordfile of q.25

Documents