word pro - environmental report 2009 - f. · pdf filethe results form the basis of part 2 -...

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

2009

Rostock, 01. May 2010

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw

Environmental Report 2009

INDEX

Table 6 : Cars supplied by the company - Fuel consumption + EmissionsFigure 6 : Consumption of writing and copy paperTable 5 : Writing and copy paperFigure 5 : Garbage - Quantity and disposal (Category 1 to 6 + specific waste)Table 4 : GarbageFigure 4 : Ballast WaterFigure 3 : SludgeTable 3 : Oily Waters / Sewage / Ballast waterFigure 2 : Development of CO2 emissions (total + relative)Table 2b : Fuel- and engine dependent gas emissionsFigure 1 : Development of spezific fuel consumption 2005 - 2009Table 2a : Specific fuel consumption Table 1 : Basic dataDefinitionsAnhänge

Costs for the realization of the Environmental Objectives in 20093.4Postphoned Environmental Objectives3.3Further too processing Environmental Objectives3.2Environmental Objectives closed in the year 20093.1ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES3.

Environmental Aspects - Shore2.2Details2.1.2Comparision to previous years2.1.1Environmental Aspects - Ship2.1ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS2.

Environmental Accidents1.5Internal Environmental Audits1.4Port State Controls1.3External Environmental Audits1.2Environmental Management Documents1.1GENERAL1.

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 1 -

1. GENERAL REMARKSThe consumption-dependent values are only resticted comparable with those of the previous year.Cause of it was the special situation of the world economy in 2009 (Lay-up of vessels, slow-steamingto saving fuel, great declining cargo transports etc.).

1.1 Environmental Management DocumentsThe environmental report 2008 was published together with the environmental policy on theInternet homepage of the shipping company. The environmental report 2008 was sent to allvessels for evaluation by the Master and their crew. Assistance in quantifying the environmental aspects was provided by the vessels in accordancewith Directive RL NTM 06-01, Annex 2. The results form the basis of part 2 - Environmentalaspects - of this report.The SOPEP Annex 2 was updated by four revisions.All vessels were supplied twice with information on maritime environmental protectionAll vessels were equipped with approved Ballast Water Management Plans in accordance withthe IMO Ballast Water Convention.In accordance with the US regulations regarding the National Pollution Discharge EliminationSystem (NPDES) a record book was developed and introduced aboard of the appropriatevessels.

1.2 External Environmental AuditsIn the year under review no NC was identified during the external shipboard audits.

1.3 Port State ControlsDuring port state controls (total 72) only four violations were determined:

two violations of MARPOL Annex I regulations (Oil Record Book) andone violation of MARPOL Annex V regulations (Garbage Record Book).

All violations were corrected by crew immediately.

1.4 Internal Environmental AuditsIn the year 2009 altogether 43 internal audits were executed. In relation to ISO14001 6 NC's weredetermined on that occasion:

knowledge of the Environmental Management System (1 x), environmental policy and objectives (1 x),Master’s review (2 x) andreporting of evaluation of compliance with environmental regulations (2 x).

The corrective actions were executed within the fixed time limits. Furthermore lacks in the SOPEP (8 x) and Garbage Management Plan (1 x) were determined.

1.5 Environmental AccidentsIn the year under review no incidents with oil or other water pollutants occurred.

Caused by constructive and technical defects aboard of 12 vessels higher quantities (more than 100kg) of refrigerants were exhausted into the atmosphere. It’s global warming potential is equivalent toapprox. 6.700 t carbon dioxide.

During an inspection in the Port of Long Beach one pollution by exhaust gases was determined by theport state administration.

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 2 -

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS2.1 Environmental Aspects - Ship

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 3 -

Slop / Sludge 13.690 m³Oily water (treated with OWS) 15.698 m³

(Sewage+Gray water) (IV)*

Category 1 : 1.120 m³ (Plastics)Category 2 : 63 m³ (Floating dunnage, lining or packing material)Category 3 : 213 m³ (Ground-down paper products, rags, glass, metall, crockery etc.)Category 4 : 491 m³ (Cargo residues, glass, metal, rags, crockery, paper etc.)Category 5 : 347 m³ (Food waste)Category 6 : 66 m³ (Ash)

* Annex to MARPOL

Cargo = 16.747.898 t

Fuel consumption = 608.083 tHFO = 585.403 t / Sulphur content (average value) = 2,52 % MDO = 22.679 t / Sulphur content (average value) = 0,46 %

Cruising radius = 3.326.520 smSO2 NOxCO2COHCCarbon black

= 33.425 t= 50.512 t= 1.892.527 t= 5.450 t= 1.525 t

= 191 t

(6.131.730 km)

33,1 g (Fuel) / 100 t (Cargo) x 1 km

4.550.500 m³

111.185 m³

Specific waste : 2.240 m³ (used chemicals and batteries, oily materials, unsorted waste etc.)

329 l

7,23 l

2.300 m³ (Cat. 1 - 6 total)

4.121 kg

4.593 t

3.787 kg

156 t

Cargo Engine Room Cargo CargoCargo

Ballast water

Oily waters (I)*

Lubricants

Chemicals/Paints

Refrigerants

Writing andCopy Paper

SPEZIFIC FUEL CONSUMPTION

incl. Packed Marine Pollutants (III)*

Funnel exhausts (VI)*

Person related water

Garbage (V)*

Quantity per person and day

and dayQuantity per person

2.1.1 Comparision to previous years

15.69821.13622.90620.41220.891Discharge via OWS (m³)5,84,65,68,710,3amount in %7867921.0241.2041.396Incineration on board94,295,494,491,389,7amount in %

12.90216.76017.16712.55912.131Discharge on shore 13.69017.56718.19113.76313.527Sludge/Slop

Waste water containing oil (m³)191248266269269,5Soot (t)

1.5251.9802.1312.1562.156HC - unburnedhydrocarbons (t)

5.4507.0907.6367.7037.730Carbon monoxide - CO (t)6554656559specific - g/100 TK

1.892.527 1)2.459.033 1)2.647.636 1)2.704.374 1)2.713.769 1)Carbon dioxide - CO2 (t)1,741,441,741,731,56specific - g/100 TK

50.51265.81670.92171.60871.859Nitric oxide - NOx (t)

1,11,11,21,31,2specific - g/100 TK 33.42546.46748.82156.32556.583Sulphur dioxide - SO2 (t)

Gas emissions (t)0,460,560,570,760,69MDO2,522,672,612,802,87HFO

Average sulphur concentration (%)

1334 (into service in the last quarter)

PCTC33,2717,2615,7311,0817,60Ro/Ro vessels49,2221,9424,8724,4721,90Container vessels16,8611,6511,849,6710,39Bulk vessels

33,1 2)18,822,126,025,7Specific fuel consumption(g/100TK)

22.68822.58722.16718.34518.350MDO (t)585.403767.662828.735839.594842.571HFO (t)

Fuel consumption2.8894.5564.0824.1374.595TK * 109 (km * t)

16.747.89824.344.53820.912.09120.629.24221.878.703Cargo (t)6.131.7307.876.5688.386.8497.909.9888.418.927Cruising radius (km)

Basic data

2009(43 vessels)

2008(43 vessels)

2007(44 vessels)

2006(40 vessels)

2005(41 vessels)

Aspect

1) Calculated according MEPC/Circ.4712) without PCTC

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 4 -

2.0772.6622.8752.6142.429Substitutes (R134A, R404A, ...)1.7092.2662.6693.1474.515R22

Refrigerants (kg)9696166,8141,1140,8Quantity per vessel (kg)

4.1214.1207.3405.6455.773Paper consumption (kg)3.6324.5123.820,54.347 5)4.352Quantity per vessel (kg)

156194168,1268,4 4)174,1Chemicals/Paints (t)106,8153,1187,7204195,8Quantity per vessel (kg)

4.5936.5858.2578.1588.028Lubricants (t)4.550.4976.729.5865.532.1517.216.5505.346.939Ballast water (m³)320.000 3)250.000 3)165.000 3)140.000 146.000Waste disposal costs (€)

Other environmental aspects2.2412.3452.324977975Specific waste (kg) - (only shore disposal)1.6301.9141.6431.8251.368Discharge on shore (m³)

670561580626620Discharge into the sea (m³)

2.3002.4752.2232.4512.988Category 1 - 6 (total - m³)Garbage

329315305292329Liter per person and day1.0101.1901.1931.0801.018Persons on board (average)

111.185119.653118.485115.153122.214Sewage (Black water) + Gray waterPerson related waste waters (m³)

2009(43 vessels)

2008(43 vessels)

2007(44 vessels)

2006(40 vessels)

2005(41 vessels)

Aspect

3) Last revision 01.05.2009

4) thereof 94,5 t paint + thinner from MV Chrismir5) without paint + thinner from MV Chrismir

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 5 -

2.1.2 Details

The vessel-specific detail statements as well as the values resultant from it for the total fleet are in thetables situated in the appendices:

Writing and Copy Paper:Table 5

Garbage:Table 4

Water - Oily waters / Sewage / Ballast water:Table 3

Fuel- and engine dependent gas emissions:Table 2b

Specific fuel consumption:Table 2a

Basic Data:Table 1

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 6 -

2.2 Environmental Aspects - Shore

regulated by a service contractnot applicableAir conditionerRefrigerant

yesyesyesyesyesWaste paper collection

3.1463.4103.3184.0963.595Paper consumption (kg)Paper

regulated through contract for servicesCollection and disposalelectronic scrap

30 kg30 kgyesyesyesCollection of used batteries

yesyesyesyesyesGarbage collection andsegregation in the offices

GarbageSee Annex Tab. 6Emissions

10 / 7 1)Consumption on 100 km (l)

16.80118.307,9213.131,0715.216,5611.411,54Diesel (l)

33.86031.526,8624.087,6736.644,9736.475,82Petrol (l)Fuel consumption

578.600576.830428.500584.000528.000Mileage (km)Cars supplied by the company

20092008200720062005Aspect

1) - average consumption petrol / average consumption diesel

Further details to the essential environmental aspects in the shore area of the shipping company arein the tables situated in the appendix:

Table 5 : Writing and copy paper

Table 6 : Cars supplied by the company - Fuel consumption + Emissions

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 7 -

3. ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES

3.1 Environmental Objectives closed in the year 2009

Finished 31.12.2009Implementation of class approved Ballast WaterManagement Plans acc. IMO-Guideline G4

08/Rev.06

RemarksEnvironmental objectiveNo.

(in acc. Annex 3 ofRL GF 06-01)

3.2 Further too processing environmental objectives

Use is a continuous taskELO - Introduction and practical application , inorder to saving photocopying paper

11/Rev.06

Use is a continuous task in thenext years

Voluntary work according IMO-Guideline forCarbondioxide-indexing (MEPC/Circ.471

09/Rev.06

Because of planing- and costreasons postponed until end of2010

Substitution of R22 with environmental friendlyalternatives in the air-conditioning system of MVPOLARSTERN and MV METEOR

07/Rev.06

Continuous taskWaste separation in the shore offices06/Rev.06

Continuous taskPublication of a company EnvironmentalInformation

04/Rev.06

See record sheet No. 01 /Rev.06;Reduction admittedly took place,however, remains continuoustask

Reduction of number and amount of dangerousworking materials used on board

01/Rev.06


(in acc. Annex 3 ofRL-GF 06-01 )

3.3 Postphoned Environmental objectives

Because of personnal resourcespostphoned to end of 2010

Preparation for the introduction of ships register fforhazardous materials acc. IMO ScrappingConvention

13/Rev.06


(in acc. Annex 3 ofRL GF 06-01)

3.4 Costs for the realisation of the Environmental Objectives in 2009

The most cost-intensive positions were:60.000 € for the Ballast Water Management Plans (preparation and approval)

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 8 -

Author : Diplom-Chemist Uwe Hauer Environmental Management Representative

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 9 -

APPENDICES

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw


- 10 -

Cruising radius Transported cargo Crew(sm) (t) incl. Passengers

average on board

BW Havlys 39.725 438.846 20BW Hesiod 78.027 344.938 22BW Herdis 59.413 119.893 22Pasadena 96.445 926.030 22Patagonia 87.850 934.008 25Peene Ore 89.680 1.171.782 28Pequot 86.052 346.585 25Piro 78.773 540.873 25Powhatan 81.094 660.254 21Premnitz 65.964 354.734 21

Pembroke 83.261 387.713 19Pontremoli 87.073 194.635 20Philadelphia 121.761 504.232 21Phoenix 131.043 438.579 21Praha 137.113 587.993 21Pretoria 134.071 557.634 21Potsdam 31.499 115.935 13Pommern 18.704 44.136 13Pona 67.747 169.728 11Posen 102.968 225.175 22Priwall 59.671 201.482 12Pontresina 114.527 523.118 21Port Said 46.629 258.000 20Palermo 90.235 446.496 23Paradip 90.451 535.384 23Peking 71.126 248.463 14Penang 52.952 172.657 14Pohang 28.541 84.912 14Portland 106.001 520.584 22Portugal 115.104 557.771 22Pudong 108.932 682.679 23Pugwash 113.844 539.389 23Punjab 98.540 807.785 25Pusan 121.839 562.506 22

Baltica 66.967 685.556 20Finlandia 72.339 91.604 22Petersburg 275 0 7Transeuropa 84.806 587.558 45Translubeca 74.676 169.031 35

Paganella 24.373 3.596 20Paganino 11.300 5.624 20

Polarstern 49.816 0 86Meteor 45.313 0 64

Total values 3.326.520 16.747.898 1.010

Bulker+Tanker

Container vessels

Ro/Ro vessels

Research vessels

PCTC

Vessels

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpwEnvironmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Table 1 : Basic data

VesselsNautical miles (nm) Kilometer (km) Tons (t) Tons per kilometer (TK = t *

km) Total (t) Specific per vessel

(g /TK)

Bulker + Tanker (total)

763.023 1.413.119 5.837.943 883.945.980.570 110.006 0,1686

BW Havlys 39.725 73.571 438.846 32.286.207.412 3.673 0,1138BWHesiod 78.027 144.506 344.938 49.845.612.008 8.620 0,1729BW Herdis 59.413 110.033 119.893 13.192.171.602 7.421 0,5626Pasadena 96.445 178.616 926.030 165.403.904.124 17.735 0,1072Patagonia 87.850 162.698 934.008 151.961.420.386 15.900 0,1046Peene Ore 89.680 166.087 1.171.782 194.618.178.876 25.050 0,1287Pequot 86.052 159.368 346.585 55.234.663.642 7.768 0,1406Piro 78.773 145.888 540.873 78.906.661.711 8.636 0,1094Powhatan 81.094 150.186 660.254 99.160.965.346 8.064 0,0813Premnitz 65.964 122.165 354.734 43.336.195.463 7.139 0,1647

Container vessels (total)

2.133.632 3.951.486 9.366.986 1.792.460.251.159 442.684 0,4922

Pembroke 83.261 154.199 387.713 59.785.101.116 10.935 0,1829Pontremoli 87.073 161.259 194.635 31.386.683.613 11.854 0,3777Philadelphia 121.761 225.501 504.232 113.705.007.806 29.516 0,2596Phoenix 131.043 242.692 438.579 106.439.455.025 30.535 0,2869Praha 137.113 253.933 587.993 149.310.988.755 32.062 0,2147

Pretoria 134.071 248.299 557.634 138.460.238.922 28.867 0,2085Potsdam 31.499 58.336 115.935 6.763.201.318 5.934 0,8774Pommern 18.704 34.640 44.136 1.528.862.566 4.401 2,8786Pona 67.747 125.467 169.728 21.295.338.335 10.343 0,4857Posen 102.968 190.697 225.175 42.940.137.529 13.506 0,3145Priwall 59.671 110.511 201.482 22.265.915.246 8.833 0,3967Pontresina 114.527 212.104 523.118 110.955.422.364 21.897 0,1974Port Said 46.629 86.357 258.000 22.280.082.264 5.314 0,2385Palermo 90.235 167.115 446.496 74.616.277.269 13.225 0,1772Paradip 90.451 167.515 535.384 89.684.985.677 12.990 0,1448Peking 71.126 131.725 248.463 32.728.876.134 16.706 0,5104Penang 52.952 98.067 172.657 16.931.971.975 14.677 0,8668Pohang 28.541 52.858 84.912 4.488.272.722 8.386 1,8684Portland 106.001 196.314 520.584 102.197.850.330 25.659 0,2511Portugal 115.104 213.173 557.771 118.901.498.737 26.284 0,2211Pudong 108.932 201.742 682.679 137.725.070.509 27.582 0,2003Pugwash 113.844 210.839 539.389 113.724.284.837 27.430 0,2412Punjab 98.540 182.496 807.785 147.417.595.983 23.789 0,1614Pusan 121.839 225.646 562.506 126.927.132.125 31.958 0,2518Ro/Ro vessels (total)

299.063 553.865 1.533.749 212.956.244.603 38.180 0,3327

Baltica 66.967 124.023 685.556 85.024.632.264 7.945 0,0934Finlandia 72.339 133.972 91.604 12.272.355.332 9.119 0,7431Petersburg 2) 275 509 0 0 1.241 n.a.Transeuropa 84.806 157.061 587.558 92.282.277.821 12.805 0,1388Translubeca 74.676 138.300 169.031 23.376.979.187 8.311 0,3555PCTC (total) 35.673 66.066 9.220 280.015.933 3.821 13,3466Paganella 24.373 45.139 3.596 162.319.110 2.470 15,2188Paganino 11.300 20.928 5.624 117.696.822 1.351 11,4744

Polarstern 1) 2) 49.816 83.957 0 0 9.349 n.a.Meteor 1) 2) 45.313 63.237 0 0 2.802 n.a.

Total values 3.326.520 6.131.730 16.747.898 2.889.642.492.265 608.083 1,04

Legende: 3)

1) - only MDO

3) - withou research vessels + MV Petersburg

3.231.116,00 5.984.027 16.747.898 2.889.642.492.265 594.691

2) - no cargo transported, therefor reference value for specific consumption = Fuel per driven route unit (kg/km)


Table 2a: Specific fuel consumption

Cruising radius Transported cargoes Fuel consumption

Research vessels

======obbabobf==cK==i^bfpw Environmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Figure 1 : Development of the specific fuel consumption 2005 - 2009

Year specific consumption (g/100TK)

2005 18,52006 222007 22,12008 18,8

2009 (1) 33,1 (1) - without PCTC

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 (1)10

15

20

25

30

35

40

spec

ific

cons

umpt

ion

(g/1

00 T

K)

Vessels Total (in t)

HFO (in t)

Sulphur content (in %)

MDO (in t)

Sulphur content (in %) SO2 NOx CO2 CO HC Soot

BW Havlys 3.673,00 3.019,00 1,46 654,00 0,10 93,94 292,18 11.462,27 32,40 9,31 1,16BW Hesiod 8.620,00 8.552,00 2,40 68,00 0,60 431,88 722,38 26.812,28 77,51 21,56 2,70BW Herdis 7.421,30 7.376,30 3,00 45,00 0,09 464,79 622,26 23.082,94 66,75 18,56 2,32Pasadena 17.735,00 17.727,00 2,03 8,00 0,90 755,85 1.489,54 55.156,33 159,61 44,34 5,54Patagonia 15.899,90 15.893,90 2,64 6,00 0,16 881,18 1.335,44 49.449,05 143,09 39,75 4,97Peene Ore 25.050,00 24.999,00 2,65 51,00 1,50 1.392,80 2.102,93 77.908,56 225,40 62,64 7,83Pequot 7.768,00 7.739,00 2,87 29,00 0,64 466,82 651,79 24.160,22 69,88 19,43 2,43Piro 8.635,60 8.621,60 2,70 14,00 1,00 489,14 725,04 26.857,56 77,71 21,59 2,70Powhatan 8.064,10 7.843,00 2,90 221,00 0,80 481,35 671,85 25.092,30 72,36 20,20 2,53Premnitz 7.139,00 7.115,00 2,84 24,00 0,42 424,55 599,08 22.203,73 64,23 17,85 2,23

Pembroke 10.935,00 10.636,00 2,30 299,00 0,33 515,79 911,07 34.025,79 98,12 27,40 3,42Pontremoli 11.854,00 11.794,00 2,29 60,00 0,06 567,25 994,24 36.869,54 106,63 29,65 3,71Philadelphia 29.516,00 28.915,30 3,43 600,70 0,45 2.088,45 2.464,33 91.830,80 265,04 73,91 9,24Phoenix 30.535,00 29.963,00 3,24 572,00 0,29 2.042,17 2.550,64 94.998,17 274,24 76,45 9,56Praha 32.062,00 31.424,60 3,49 637,40 0,66 2.311,94 2.677,27 99.751,06 287,92 80,28 10,04Pretoria 28.867,00 28.266,00 3,40 601,00 0,40 2.023,24 2.409,80 89.812,43 259,20 72,29 9,04Potsdam 5.934,20 5.881,40 2,89 52,80 0,26 357,23 497,15 18.458,53 53,36 14,85 1,86Pommern 4.401,00 4.298,00 2,86 103,00 0,30 258,79 367,11 13.693,29 39,51 11,02 1,38Pona 10.343,00 10.341,00 2,10 10,90 1,50 456,38 869,29 32.195,06 93,16 25,88 3,24Posen 13.506,00 13.494,00 2,74 12,00 1,89 776,92 1.134,20 42.004,38 121,54 33,77 4,22Priwall 8.833,00 8.572,00 1,73 261,00 0,05 311,69 735,45 27.486,29 79,24 22,13 2,77Pontresina 21.897,30 21.890,00 2,54 7,30 0,57 1.167,70 1.839,19 68.101,04 197,07 54,74 6,84Port Said 5.313,90 5.296,30 2,36 17,60 0,18 262,55 445,93 16.527,29 47,81 13,29 1,66Palermo 13.225,00 13.140,00 2,50 85,00 1,00 691,64 1.108,78 41.134,85 118,94 33,08 4,13Paradip 12.990,00 12.944,00 2,60 46,00 0,10 706,84 1.090,01 40.401,66 116,86 32,48 4,06Peking 16.706,00 16.569,00 2,59 137,00 0,21 901,79 1.399,88 51.963,88 150,22 41,79 5,22Penang 14.677,00 14.655,00 3,56 22,00 0,38 1.095,78 1.232,32 45.646,79 132,07 36,70 4,59Pohang 8.386,00 8.318,30 2,51 67,70 0,87 439,69 702,73 26.084,52 75,41 20,98 2,62Portland 25.659,40 25.588,40 2,77 71,00 0,20 1.488,78 2.153,61 79.804,99 230,86 64,16 8,02Portugal 26.284,00 26.243,00 2,90 41,00 0,30 1.598,46 2.206,83 81.745,70 236,52 65,72 8,21Pudong 27.582,00 27.518,00 1,96 64,00 1,06 1.134,07 2.315,29 85.783,86 248,17 68,97 8,62Pugwash 27.430,30 27.410,00 2,82 20,30 0,25 1.623,33 2.303,64 85.309,45 246,85 68,58 8,57Punjab 23.789,00 23.733,80 3,20 55,20 0,35 1.595,32 1.996,90 73.987,10 214,05 59,48 7,44Pusan 31.958,10 31.921,10 2,38 37,00 0,20 1.595,57 2.683,56 99.391,91 287,59 79,90 9,99

Baltica 7.945,40 7.888,50 1,46 56,90 0,09 241,97 665,99 24.713,61 71,45 19,87 2,48Finlandia 9.119,00 8.117,00 2,70 1.002,00 0,07 461,71 740,95 28.420,21 81,07 23,00 2,87Petersburg 1.241,00 51,00 1,35 1.190,00 0,03 2,20 74,49 3.930,91 9,98 3,34 0,42Transeuropa 12.805,00 11.212,00 1,34 1.593,00 0,06 317,51 1.035,80 39.919,13 113,65 32,33 4,04Translubeca 8.310,80 6.653,70 1,36 1.657,10 0,08 192,64 656,68 25.946,01 73,14 21,11 2,64

Paganella 2.470,30 2.454,30 2,09 16,00 0,20 107,79 207,11 7.683,59 22,22 6,18 0,77Paganino 1.350,50 1.328,50 2,20 22,00 0,20 61,47 112,89 4.201,38 12,13 3,38 0,42

Polarstern 9.349,00 0 0 9.349,00 0,63 123,69 551,59 29.636,33 74,79 25,24 3,16Meteor 2.802,00 0 0 2.802,00 0,39 22,95 165,32 8.882,34 22,42 7,57 0,95

Total values 608.083,10 585.403,00 2,516 22.688,90 0,461 33.425,57 50.512,50 1.892.527,14 5.450,14 1.524,77 190,60

Ro/Ro vessels

Research vessels

Container vessels

Bulker + Tanker

PCTC

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw

Environmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Table 2b: Fuel and engine dependent gas emissions

Fuel consumption Gas emission - kind and quantity (t)

obbabobf==cK==i^bfpwEnvironmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Figure 2 : Development of CO2-Emissions 2005 - 2009 (total + relativ)

Year CO2 - total (t) CO2 - relativ (g/TK) Tons per Kilometer (TK*10^9)2005 2.713.769 0,65 45952006 2.704.374 0,59 41372007 2.647.636 0,64 40832008 2.459.033 0,54 45562009 1.892.527 0,65 2889

2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

3.000

CO

2-Q

uant

ity (t

otal

in 1

000

t)

0,50

0,60

0,70

0,80

0,90

1,00

CO

2 - r

elat

iv (

g/TK

)

Crew

Vessels Sludge/ Slop (m³) %-Fuel content incinerated (m³) Disposal-Shore (m³) Disposal OWS (m³) incl. Passengers Sewage (Black water) Gray water Sum Sewage + Gray Water

Litre per person and day (l) Ballast water (m³)

BW Havlys 330,0 8,98 0 330,0 372,0 20 2.928 2.000 4.928 675,07 342.676

BW Hesiod 128,0 1,48 114,6 13,4 344,0 22 157 2.090 2.247 279,83 138.006

BW Herdis 92,9 1,25 88,3 4,6 483,5 22 160 1.800 1.960 244,08 180.000

Pasadena 206,6 1,16 165,5 41,1 547,3 22 197 2.590 2.787 347,07 420.196

Patagonia 203,0 1,28 78,7 122,3 617,3 25 1.165 2.850 4.015 440,00 347.195

Peene Ore 288,4 1,15 29,8 258,6 998,7 28 150 2.900 3.050 298,43 655.704

Pequot 89,1 1,15 89,1 0,0 148,4 25 790 2.830 3.620 396,71 241.481

Piro 91,0 1,05 81 10,0 183,2 25 550 2.500 3.050 334,25 151.101Powhatan 158,0 1,96 19 139,0 113,7 21 200 3.000 3.200 417,48 234.273

Premnitz 93,4 1,31 12,4 81,0 128,3 21 120 1.800 1.920 250,49 183.866

Pembroke 304,0 2,78 0 304,0 192,8 19 183 1.820 2.003 288,75 57.193

Pontremoli 334,0 2,82 0 334,0 345,3 20 80 1.700 1.780 243,84 119.773

Philadelphia 261,7 0,89 0 261,7 597,2 21 345 2.375 2.720 354,86 64.131

Phoenix 382,1 1,25 0 382,1 404,9 21 267 3.715 3.982 519,50 59.170

Praha 313,0 0,98 0 313,0 292,1 21 130 2.940 3.070 400,52 79.285

Pretoria 278,8 0,97 0 278,8 285,6 21 265 1.850 2.115 275,93 22.016

Potsdam 219,0 3,69 0 219,0 81,2 13 250 860 1.110 233,93 81.158

Pommern 203,0 4,61 0 203,0 211,1 13 600 903 1.503 316,75 19.587

Pona 61,5 0,59 54,45 7,0 176,6 11 269 760 1.029 256,29 35.617

Posen 199,5 1,48 0 199,5 87,4 22 800 1.777 2.577 320,92 13.839

Priwall 260,4 2,95 2 258,4 250,1 12 1.000 2.500 3.500 799,09 71.507

Pontresina 390,4 1,78 0 390,4 474,0 21 475 1.025 1.500 195,69 43.154

Port Said 206,0 3,88 0 206,0 165,8 20 185 1.500 1.685 230,82 59.117

Palermo 393,0 2,97 0 393,0 363,5 23 365 3.505 3.870 460,99 19.590

Paradip 229,2 1,76 0 229,2 283,7 23 304 2.065 2.369 282,19 45.867

Peking 295,7 1,77 0 295,7 306,5 14 2.073 1.555 3.628 709,98 7.293

Penang 303,1 2,07 0 303,1 507,3 14 0 1.672 1.672 327,20 13.819

Pohang 329,2 3,93 0 329,2 92,1 14 251 1.450 1.701 332,88 14.489

Portland 426,0 1,66 0 426,0 700,4 22 300 2.700 3.000 373,60 69.909

Portugal 589,4 2,24 0 589,4 623,0 22 240 2.409 2.649 329,89 71.757

Pudong 804,0 2,91 0 804,0 849,0 23 350 2.060 2.410 287,08 41.813

Pugwash 552,7 2,01 0 552,7 582,2 23 201 1.405 1.606 191,30 138.102Punjab 522,0 2,19 0 522,0 594,0 25 730 2.105 2.835 310,68 76.583

Pusan 323,4 1,01 0 323,4 706,9 22 498 2.578 3.076 383,06 37.906

Baltica 963,0 12,12 0 963,0 0,0 20 400 2.000 2.400 328,77 312.460

Finlandia 876,0 9,61 0 876,0 364,6 22 845 1.975 2.820 351,18 50.912

Petersburg 151,0 12,17 0 151,0 357,0 7 160 1.100 1.260 493,15 500

Transeuropa 525,0 4,10 0 525,0 687,0 45 1.200 2.500 3.700 225,27 0

Translubeca 1074,0 12,92 0 1074,0 129,6 35 483 2.284 2.767 216,59 0

Paganella 38,6 1,56 3,25 35,3 114,7 20 45 407 452 61,92 4.361Paganino 19,2 1,42 0 19,2 30,4 20 28 252 280 38,36 9.848

Polarstern 130,0 1,39 0 130,0 440,4 86 0 6.947 6.947 221,31 13.561

Meteor 52,0 1,86 48 4,0 465,2 64 598 1.794 2.392 102,40 1.682

Total values 13.690,20 3,05 786,10 12.902,10 15.698,00 1.010 20.337 90.848 111.185 329,03 4.550.497

Research vessels

Ro/Ro vessels

Container vessels

Bulker + Tanker

PCTC


Table 3 : Oily water / Sewage / Ballast water

Oily water Person related sewage (m³)


Figure 3 : Oily water - Sludge

Year Sludge quantity total (m³) Shore disposal (m³) Percentage incinerated on board (%)2005 13.527 12.132 89,7 10,32006 13.763 12.559 91,3 8,72007 18.191 17.167 94,4 5,62008 17.567 16.760 95,4 4,62009 13.690 12.902 94,2 5,8

2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

5000

10000

15000

20000Sl

udge

- To

tal q

uant

ity (t

)

Total quantity Shore disposal

Sludge - Total quantity and shore disposal

2005 2006 2007 2008 200980

85

90

95

100

Perc

enta

ge s

hore

dis

posa

l (%

)

0

5

10

15

inci

nera

ted

on b

oard

(%)

Sludge - Percentage shore disposal

============================obbabobf==cK==i^bfpw Environmental Aspects -Year : 2009

Figure 4 : Ballast water

Year Quantity (Mio. t) Bulk vessels VCS Other2005 5,35 3,23 2,06 0,052006 7,22 3,65 3,53 0,042007 5,53 2,85 2,26 0,422008 6,73 4,27 2,06 0,42009 4,55 2,89 1,26 0,39

2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Qua

ntity

(Mio

. Ton

s)

Development quantity of exchanged ballast water

Crew

Vessels incl. passengers Cat.1 Quantity 1-6 per Person + day (l) Specific waste

BW Havlys 20 11,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1,40 0,40 0,00 0,00 12,8 0,40 1,75 64,00

BW Hesiod 22 35,00 0,70 0,70 14,02 8,32 5,00 0,00 21,34 10,96 4,78 4,38 80,84 24,36 10,07 13,42

BW Herdis 22 34,60 2,00 2,00 0,00 0,00 4,24 4,24 8,30 8,30 9,40 0,04 58,54 14,58 7,29 19,15

Pasadena 22 15,30 4,50 3,00 3,80 0,00 62,58 57,68 11,65 10,30 1,00 0,00 98,83 70,98 12,31 0,72

Patagonia 25 18,60 11,80 11,80 1,10 0,00 45,42 45,42 60,97 60,09 0,60 0,00 138,49 117,31 15,18 0,30

Peene Ore 28 30,00 0,00 0,00 19,00 14,00 4,20 4,20 4,35 4,30 14,40 0,00 71,95 22,50 7,04 9,20

Pequot 25 10,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8,00 8,00 7,00 7,00 3,00 0,00 28 15,00 3,07 1,00

Piro 25 17,50 3,75 3,75 0,00 0,00 20,99 20,99 5,52 5,52 0,00 0,00 47,76 30,26 5,23 5,14

Powhatan 21 33,10 5,10 1,90 10,42 6,72 22,99 20,69 11,78 9,68 0,85 0,15 84,24 39,14 10,99 5,30

Premnitz 21 17,18 0,63 0,63 1,22 1,22 29,24 29,24 2,45 2,45 0,00 0,00 50,72 33,54 6,62 11,82

Pembroke 19 18,90 20,50 0,20 6,10 0,10 25,28 0,65 14,32 5,81 1,12 0,00 86,22 6,76 12,43 6,89

Pontremoli 20 33,20 4,25 0,20 4,20 0,00 28,64 7,84 4,53 3,29 0,20 0,00 75,02 11,33 10,28 15,47

Philadelphia 21 24,70 2,50 0,00 26,30 0,00 2,00 0,50 6,26 6,26 11,60 0,00 73,36 6,76 9,57 1,46

Phoenix 21 16,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 18,60 18,60 3,70 3,70 0,00 0,00 38,7 22,30 5,05 41,00

Praha 21 18,80 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2,60 2,60 6,20 6,20 0,00 0,00 27,6 8,80 3,60 22,30

Pretoria 21 25,78 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5,20 5,20 8,17 8,17 0,00 0,00 39,15 13,37 5,11 37,47

Potsdam 13 91,20 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2,00 2,00 0,00 0,00 93,2 2,00 19,64 125,20

Pommern 13 24,00 0,00 0,00 11,50 0,00 0,00 0,00 2,58 0,00 0,00 0,00 38,08 0,00 8,03 17,85

Pona 11 2,09 1,40 1,00 0,00 0,00 6,25 2,65 3,47 2,27 2,00 0,00 15,21 5,92 3,79 0,80

Posen 22 19,40 1,20 1,20 2,80 2,80 10,70 0,00 13,40 5,80 4,30 0,00 51,8 9,80 6,45 1,00

Priwall 12 28,89 0,00 0,00 0,50 0,50 0,00 0,00 4,85 0,00 0,00 0,00 34,24 0,50 7,82 24,05

Pontresina 21 16,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 19,10 7,05 14,90 14,50 0,00 0,00 50 21,55 6,52 6,35

Port Said 20 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2,50 2,50 3,34 3,34 0,00 0,00 5,84 5,84 0,80 64,38

Palermo 23 29,00 0,00 0,00 0,11 0,11 8,70 8,70 3,75 3,75 0,00 0,00 41,56 12,56 4,95 32,50

Paradip 23 38,20 0,00 0,00 7,90 7,90 3,90 3,90 3,31 3,31 0,00 0,00 53,31 15,11 6,35 13,57

Peking 14 23,90 0,00 0,00 27,72 27,75 69,12 0,00 6,20 5,80 0,21 0,00 127,15 33,55 24,88 69,52

Penang 14 26,63 0,30 0,10 33,60 0,00 6,56 4,76 3,36 2,88 0,09 0,00 70,54 7,74 13,80 9,67

Pohang 14 28,00 0,00 0,00 0,30 0,30 0,90 0,90 5,05 5,05 0,10 0,00 34,35 6,25 6,72 31,91

Portland 22 30,80 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 4,00 4,00 2,58 2,58 0,00 0,00 37,38 6,58 4,66 44,30

Portugal 22 31,00 0,40 0,00 3,30 3,30 20,40 4,10 5,76 4,74 0,70 0,00 61,56 12,14 7,67 10,26

Pudong 23 54,00 0,00 0,00 2,60 2,60 5,00 5,00 6,60 6,60 0,06 0,06 68,26 14,26 8,13 29,51

Pugwash 23 41,50 2,70 0,00 5,90 1,70 4,90 0,10 5,59 2,26 0,45 0,00 61,04 4,06 7,27 3,10

Punjab 25 51,74 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 13,96 13,96 5,25 5,25 0,20 0,20 71,15 19,41 7,80 36,67

Pusan 22 22,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 11,20 11,20 6,42 6,42 0,00 0,00 39,62 17,62 4,93 12,40

Baltica 20 27,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 3,80 0,00 0,00 0,00 31,2 0,00 4,27 53,80

Finlandia 22 27,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 27,4 0,00 3,41 220,10

Petersburg 7 4,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 27,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 31 0,00 12,13 80,00

Transeuropa 45 21,70 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 21,7 0,00 1,32 280,00

Translubeca 35 55,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 55 0,00 4,31 739,00

Paganella 20 10,80 0,00 0,00 7,15 4,64 0,95 0,95 2,59 1,99 0,30 0,00 21,79 7,58 2,98 3,30

Paganino 20 3,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 7,55 0,80 0,67 0,67 0,00 0,00 11,22 1,47 1,54 2,85

Polarstern 86 20,70 0,00 0,00 12,20 12,00 9,20 0,00 14,90 14,90 2,60 0,00 59,6 26,90 1,90 5,00Meteor 64 31,00 1,70 0,00 11,80 2,50 1,10 0,00 22,00 0,00 7,80 0,00 75,4 2,50 3,23 69,00

Total values 1.010 1.119,81 63,43 26,48 213,54 96,46 490,97 296,42 347,31 246,54 65,76 4,83 2.300,82 670,73 7,23 2.240,73

Garbage nach MARPOL Annex V (m³)

Environmental Aspects - Year : 2009obbabobf=cK=i^bfpw=

Table 4 : Garbage

Cat.6 / therfrom into the sea Sum Cat 1-6 / therefrom into the seaCat.2 / therefrom into the sea Cat.3 / therefrom into the sea Cat.4 / therefrom into the sea Cat.5 / therefrom into the sea

Bulker + Tanker

Container vessels

Ro/Ro vessels

Research vessels

PCTC

======obbabobf==cK==i^bfpw Environmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Figure 5 : Garbage - Quantity and disposal (Category 1 to 6 + Specific waste)

Year Quantity (total - m³) therefrom shore disposal or incinerated on board (m³) Quantity per vessel (m³) Shore disposal or incinerated (%) Quantity into the sea (m³) into the sea per vesself (m³)2005 2.964 2.344 72 79,0 620 15,12006 3.429 2.803 85 81,3 626 15,62007 4.547 3.967 103 87,0 580 13,22008 4.820 4.259 112 88,4 561 13,02009 4.541 3.930 106 86,5 670 15,6

2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

1

2

3

4

5

Qua

ntity

in m

³ (x1

000)

Garbage - Total quantity

2005 2006 2007 2008 200970

80

90

100

110

120

Qua

ntity

in m

³

Garbage - Quantity per vessel

2005 2006 2007 2008 200912,513,013,514,014,515,015,516,0

Qua

ntity

in m

³

Garbage - Quantity per vessel into the sea

Table 5 : Writing and copy paper

Shore

672.500DIN A4 sheets annual1.345Packages (500 sheets DIN A4 per package)

Ship

881.000DIN A4 sheets annual1.762Packages (500 sheets DIN A4 per package)

Calculation of the total consumption

Quality : SB 75 g/m² // Dimensions : 0,21 x 0,297 m // Area per sheet : 0,06237 m² Bleached without Chloro, Manufactures according ISO 14001 certified or alternatively withenvironmental marking FSC

Total area :41.944 m² (Shore) + 54.948 m² (Ship) = 96.892 m² (approximately 18 Soccer fields)

Total mass : 3.146 kg (Shore) + 4.121 kg (Ship) = 7.267 kg

(Sources: Shore: monthly office materials orders / Ship: Purchasing department)

obbabobf====cK===i^bfpwEnvironmental Aspect - Year : 2009


Figure 6 : Paper consumption

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Vessels 41 44 44 43 43

Quantity (kg)total 9528 9742 10658 8230 7267

per vessel 228,5 221,4 242,2 191,4 169at shore per vessel 91,6 93,1 75,4 79,3 73,2

at shore total 3755 4096 3318 3410 3146

2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

2

4

6

8

10

12

Qua

ntity

(in

1000

kg)

Total paper consumption

2005 2006 2007 2008 200970

75

80

85

90

95

Qua

ntity

(kg)

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

Quantity per vessel

Quantity per vessel at shore

Quantity per vessel

Table 6 : Cars supplied by the company - Fuel consumption + Emissions

50.661Total quantity16.80133.860Quantity - Year

Consumption Diesel (l)

Consumption Petrol(l)

Sources: monthly tank settlements

Calculation of emissions

4416213,5121156.980576.8302008 total4416213,5113,9162.110578.6002009 total

n.a.93,6 (253.760240.0007Diesel 4

416213,520,3 (1108.350338.60010Petrol

Benzene(kg)

Soot(kg)

HC(kg)

CO(kg)

NOx

(kg)CO2

(kg)Consumption

l / 100 kmKind

Emissions (approx.)Mileage 2009

(km)

Fel

(1) - per km emissions of approx. 0,06 g NOx

(2) - per km emissions of approx. 0,39 g NOx

obbabobf====cK===i^bfpwEnvironmental Aspects - Year : 2009

Specific waste (used batteries and chemicals, solvent and paintresidues, oil filters, empty oil drums etc.)

otherIncinerator ashCat. 6Food wasteCat. 5

Cargo residues,paper products, rags, glass, metal, bottles, crockeryetc.

Cat. 4Ground paper products, rags, glass, metal, bottles, crockery etc.Cat. 3Floating dunnage, lining and packing materialsCat. 2PlasticsCat. 1Garbage

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from ShipsMARPOL

Each person, who doesn’t belong the crew

Passengers

parts per million - Concentration statment without dimensionppm

Oily Water SeparatorOWS

nautical miles; 1 nm = 1,852 kmnm

Ton-Kilometer = Size of the transportation performance(Cargo weight times distance)

TK

Statement which amount of fuel to the transportation of a certain freightquantity over a certain distance is required

Specific FuelConsumption

Sewage from galley, laundry, showers, wash-basins etc.Gray water

Sewage from the toilet installations and the medicated treatment roomSewage („Black water”)

Tri- Butyl-Tin - Biozid in the underwater Antifouling-Paints for ships

TBT

Unburned hydrocarbons; Cause is the incomplete combustion of the fuel

HC

Carbon monoxide; Cause is the incomplete combustion of the fuelCO

Carbon dioxide

CO2

Nitric oxides

NOx

Sulohur dioxide;Formed through the oxidation in the fuel contained sulphur

SO2

Marine Diesel OilMDO

Heavy Fuel OilHFO

Non-ConformityNC

Germanischer Lloyd Certification GmbHGLC

Appendix : Definitions / Abbreviations

obbabobf=cK=i^bfpwEnvironmental Report 2009