women in a bind: the decline of marriage, markets and the state - mimi abramovitz

37
1 Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State Mimi Abramovitz Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter, City University of New York &The Graduate Center, CUNY July 19. 2013 The Cabell Brand Center & the Shephard Program at Washington & Lee

Upload: rpesapan

Post on 07-Nov-2014

470 views

Category:

Career


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

1

Women in a Bind:The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the

State

Mimi Abramovitz

Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter,City University of New York &The Graduate Center, CUNY

July 19. 2013

The Cabell Brand Center & the Shephard Program at Washington & Lee

Page 2: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

2

The Three Pillars of Women’s Economic Security

1. Marriage

2. The Market (Labor Market)3. The State (The Welfare State)

Page 3: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

3

Decline of Marriage Adults Married (18 yrs. +) 1960: 72% 2010: 51%

Proportion of Age 18-29: Married1960: 59% 2010: 20%

Proportion of Population: Married 1972: 10.8 per 1000 pop 2000: 8.3 per 1000 pop2011: 6.8 per 1000 pop

Source: U.S. Census (2010) America’s Families and Living Arrangements, Historical Tables Marital Status of the Population, 15 Years and Older by Sex and Race, 1950 to Present

Page 4: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

4

Fewer Marriages

Page 5: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

5

Households Headed by Married Couples

2010: 48% 2005: 51% 2000: 53%1995: 54% 1990: 56%1980: 60%1970: 70%1960: 74%

1950: 78%

Source: Census Bureau, CPS, Social & Economic Supplements

Page 6: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

6

More and More Men and Women Postpone Marriage

Median Age At First Marriage:

Year Men Women 1950 24.8 22.5

1960 22.8 20.31980 24.7 22.01990 26.1 23.92000 26.8 25.12010 29.0 26.0

Source: US Census,CPS, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 2010 and earlier ; US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Vital Statistics of the United States, 1950

Page 7: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

7

MARITAL STATUS of Women by Race

1960 2012

Black Women 60% 26%

White Women 67% 51%

SOURCE: US Census, American Families and Living Arrangements, Detailed Tables for Current Population Report, P20-537 T.A1 2000, 2009

Page 8: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

8

Men in the Labor Force (20 years +)

1948: 88.2%1960: 85.6%

1965: 84.1%

1970: 82.9%

1975: 80.4%1980: 79.4%

1985: 78.1%1990: 78.4%1995: 77.0%

2000: 76.9%

2005:75.6%

2010: 74.3% 2013: 72.7%

Source; U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statists, Household Data . Table A-1. . :

Page 9: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

9

Page 10: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

10

Declining Male Wages and Purchasing Power

Median Weekly Wage

(Male 16 yrs. +)

Year ( Current 2012) (Inflation adjusted )

1979 $ 299 $393 2012 $ 868 $376

Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistic

Page 11: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

11

Dual Earner Couples

1970 2011

Percent of Dual Earner Couples

46% 60%

Wives % of Family Income

27% 40%

Wives Earned More Than Husband

18% (1987) 29%

Source: US Dept .of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Women’s Bureau,Women in the Labor

Force: A Data Book 2012.

Page 12: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

12

Women in the Labor Force(1948-2013)

1948: 31.1% 1960: 36.3.%1970: 43.4%1975: 45.9 %1980: 51.2%1985: 54.8%1990: 58.0%1995: 59.2 %2000: 60.8% ( peak)2005: 60.1%2010: 60.5%2013 58.7.3:

• Source: US Dept of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,, Labor Force Statistics From The Current Population Survey. Labor Force Statistics From The Current Population Survey.1948-2013.

Page 13: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

13

Job Loss Among WomenDuring the Economic Recovery

2009- 20135.8 million jobs

added to the private sector

Gains by GenderWomen gained 2.2 jobs

Men gained 3.6 Jobs

Source : National Women’s Law Center

Page 14: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

14

Declining Values of Women’s Wages and Purchasing Power

Median Weekly Wage (Female 16 yrs. +)

Year (Current) (Inflation adjusted )

1979 $ 185 $251 2012 $ 693 $301

Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistic

Page 15: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

15

June 10, 1963 -President John F. KennedySigns the Equal Pay Act Into Law

Source: Brunner, Borgna, The Wage Gap :A history of Pay Inequity and the Equal pay Act.

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/equalpayact1.html

Page 16: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

16

Gender Wage Gap: Female to Male Wage Ratio (Full time workers)

Year F/M Earnings Ratio

1960 60.71965 59.9

1970 59.41975 58.8

1980 60.21985 64.61990 71.61995 71.42000 73.7

2005 77.02010 77.4

Source: Institute for Women’s Policy Research, #F350 (2012)

Page 17: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

17

Causes of Gender Wage Gap

• Wage Discrimination•

Women’s Near Exclusive Responsibit for Care Work in the Home

•Concentration of Women in Low-Paid

Women’s Jobs

Page 18: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

18

Page 19: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

19

Wages vs Productivity 1950-2010

Source: Economic Policy Institute ,2012

Page 20: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

20

Poverty Rate for Women1966-2011

1966: 16.3%1970: 14.0%

1973: 12.5% ( low)1980: 14.7%1985: 15.6%1990: 15.2%1995: 15.4%2000 :12.6%2005: 14.1%2011: 16.3%

Source: US, Census Historical Poverty Tables

Page 21: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

21

1970s: Slowed Economic Growth Blamed On

“Big Government”: especially the welfare state spending viewed as undercutting Private investment & increasing the debt, deficit and interest rates.

Victories of Social Movements: Empowered workers, women and persons of color which led to increased labor costs.

“Personal Irresponsibility”: Welfare State programs uncut the work ethic, heterosexual marriage and family formation.Source: Abramovitz, M. (2004)

Page 22: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

22

The U- Turn in Public Pollcy

Beginning in the mid -1970s the main or overriding goal goal of U.S social

welfare policy has been to> Redistribute income upward from the have

nots ( the 99%) to the haves ( the 1%) The era of cuts backs began with President Reagan in 1980 (Reaganomics) and has persisted in varying degrees furing every Presidential Administration since then/

Page 23: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

23

Main Cutback Tactics-Tax Cuts

-Reduced Social Spending

-Privatization of Public Services

-Shift Federal Responsibility for social Welfare to the State

-Weaken Social Movements-Penalize “Personally Irresponsible

Behavior”Source: Abramovitz, M (2004)

Page 24: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

24

Spending Cuts : #1

Entitlement Spending ( % of GDP)

1983: 9.5% of GDP ( high)

2012: 8.4% of GDP

Page 25: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

25

Page 26: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

26

Spending Cuts: #2 Discretionary Spending ( Non Defense)

Share of all Federal Spending 1962: 68% 2012: 36%

Share of GDP 1962-2012Average: 3.9%

Never Below 3.2%Projected for 2022: 2.8%

( 14% lower than lowest point in last 50 yrs)

Page 27: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

27

Discretionary( non Defense) Spending Levels as a Share of GDP. 1962-2022

Page 28: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

28

Wider Impact of Shrinking the State Strategy

• Higher Poverty Rates• Relationship Between wages & profits • Increased Inequality

Page 29: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

29

Higher Poverty Rates for Women 1966-2011

1966: 16.3%1970: 14.0%1973: 12.5% ( low)1980: 14.7%1985: 15.6%1990: 15.2%1995: 15.4%2000 :12.6%2005: 14.1%2011: 16.3% ( same as in 1966)

Source: US, Census Historical Poverty Tables

Page 30: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

30

Wages & Profits: Percentage of National Income• Year Wages Wages /Benefits Profits• 1932 59.5% 60.6% -0.4%• 1950 55.7% 58.7% 13.6%• 1965 55.7% 61.1% 13.4%• 1970 59.3% 66.3% 9.0%• 1975 56.4% 65. 6% 9.3%• 1980 56.5% 67.7% 8.2%• 1985 53.6% 65.2% 8.9%• 1990 54.1% 65.6% 8.6%• 1995 53.2% 65.0% 10.8%• 2000 54.9% 65.7% 9.3%• 2005 52.4% 65.0% 12.3%• 2010 49.8 % 62.2% 12.9%• Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. & The Economist

Page 31: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

31

Wages and Profits: Share of National Income 1957-2009

Source: Dept of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Affairs

Page 32: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

32

Income Inequality: 1967-2012

YearLowest Fifth

Second Fifth

Third Fifth

Fourth Fifth

Highest Fifth Top 5 %

2011 3.2 8.4 14.3 23 49.7 21.72005 3.4 8.6 14.6 23 50.5 22.22000 3.6 8.9 14.8 23 49.8 22.11995 3.7 9.1 15.2 23.3 48.7 211990 3.8 9.6 15.9 24 46.6 18.51985 3.9 9.8 16.2 24.4 45.6 17.61980 4.2 10.2 16.8 24.7 44.1 16.51975 4.3 10.4 17 24.7 43.6 16.51970 4.1 10.8 17.4 24.5 43.3 16.61967 4 10.8 17.3 24.2 43.6 17.2

Source : US Census

Page 33: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

33

Tripple Jeopardy

Women are the majority of those

1. who use government program 2. who work in government jobs

3. belong to public sector unins

Page 34: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

34

Women as Public Sector Workers: 2011

•Women as a % Government Workers All Government: 48%

• Federal: 43.0% State: 51.7% Local: 61.4%

Page 35: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

35

Job Loss by Women in Public Sector2009-2013

Jobs lost in public sector: 737,000 Jobs lost by women: 435,000*Jobs lost by men: 305, 000**

* wiped out 20% of women’s private sector job gains** wipes out 8.4% of men’s private sector job gains

• Source: National Women’s Law Center

Page 36: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

36

Union Membership(% of of all employed)

Public and Private Private Public 1954 :35% ( peak) 1983: 20.1% -- -- 1985: 18.0% -- -- 1990: 16.0% -- -- 1995: 14.9% -- -- 2000: 13.4% 9.0% 36.9% 2005: 12.5% 7.8% 36.5% 2010: 11.9% 6.9% 36.2%2012: 10.5% 6.6% 35.9%

Source : Bureau of Labor Statistics

Page 37: Women in a Bind: The Decline of Marriage, Markets and the State - Mimi Abramovitz

37

“First they Ignore you.

Then they laugh at you.

Then they fight you

Then you win.”

….Mahatma Ghandi 1869-1948