+wkly g~~c ply~
TRANSCRIPT
Jo: +~~v-~ Cra~~~&A+~~'Q ~IJg~ +Wkly plgs'plOA
c/~ ( N, g~~c R I(c'+q
+~Ica~ 6t ~ G Q Q 'p eL I/
gr. -. g krf. @dd&47-mrs~~2 D~ Mr ~a ~8- ++~ ™&
gg.~-~ ~ Ap~Pg l .~Q wSW
I1 i~cQc Vlcc Q~4 '(Sn~ Ply~ fl one'
$c, Q. 'F ccrg„
5 & (e7TEg. err+ We. A7lAc4C+W ~~&+~~ +A&C ~~~5&rrI ~g~&gaerr~W»Eiw ~p ~~+@'~7~~+r~p~g~pc5~~
847cdAI CJP(r P(c~ C~ +~)aN r~ W r=+A~~E&&~p~gg~prup+w
jg +4l~z.~7 ~ ~ 7$p Q( Qb / + c~ Q ~ ~g~)p5c/l l ~+lgg CPa &+Mcs/~MN~M + Qc BNp4 pma~g+ ~gJ+Iz+g~~ rp sent ~gp gc. m~-s~~a~dr~ ~gucmP tfi~v"y~u Mcn~
4 Il Az A 8+~~4r 6 s 7N 7k' Z ~vc 26~~ C u 1/C c(gaga m .' ~g &CVA'
gc c~rc4E ejgda~9Po~ +c&c( ~ r ~ AE'&gglcS ogiPef~ (A &gee
$cc vzcqg Pygmy)+ &&ST s Cz Jc A pjX 2s&r- r38'~~dPps+laic(gQ.
C~ ~~ )%A &~A& ~p ~lcm/ IH 7o 7%lS~~Zj&M
sN g~~ use +KAp6s ~ gg Q @&5'$ ~QN + 'g& ~cW/~Q ~p/
A~r~ ~p 4 2r (& a. Py wpgr~s FNjU, ~A .WQ&~p le I(
~P&s &5%5 Ag gun~ ~AI~Z(c 4~&cA- w Dz Zr's. g~AAy k~—0/u7i eA ru +ay ~rI K~ mrs MP!J ~~Pr~g~ '~Wa~~4&
++.ppp&(c &~j'(Ep 4 P~~r /~ g~ ~/we+-warm &rrA7~~&cf
/ k' Apd'i8d ~&~~K&A c=+Znwc~CA/ if%.&~a~/& W4i 4i P5'/n&C(uckJ A 1/5 Pap gd-re Artcc'. ~p~r~ ~77A&A+d.
p~c7/~fry A'Z~ ~~ +FIST mC D~~ issic,a0'up$snd ey'e/~r~ ~p pfPI a.m. 7'p ~wrm~Q ~P&~~+y~re~5'~cc carom -c m&C'R &~P+~r~r my r& &poco pere Jw ~
"_---_ E-_ k-.cUA _- _
7$C' 4"%4~&c~~Cld.4 4faP ~~KM~ c~wpaPZ~~
~Ap WS' A'QcKc z~~ +&tS~p/4 s'w~ 1~ i i~ma gg H~JC
Age ~g&7i~o w~ ~g ~~X E&g~/ Zc~s&~zfSinai'Wzc.
z Zg W~& ~Av-Af +~ E.rifi op MgL Mw ~~~i~~ lM P4MWmmgs 54'~mS'
C&ffQP, .C. (~a ) ball CO@'S)
l ycupv a&\~ +pg jvg/c 5cwv ac& Q~ acypi~4 ~FR ~wgr ~
~gzcm ~Mr c5~~ca~g~ (g ((-(~ apc~f g9p-7~4~y
z& p,p c ~cl~~iu~+N r~/ ~Ã
A«wc. l mew i ~ +- ~ ~&~~C.L ~me ~ a ~md i - ( «(~ C (~ «k ~vc3
g) Qge g g @('85 4 n.c.; u~p n~u ~/ ~~6.(&~~
Q g Q~ p~/C
g) Qg ~1~4 L'toa I4.: s.~cp sos&~ p&+~p ) Qfga 7 lz g C /'p Af 5 lA' Vo [ C CC ) C 4~~&~ &qpc 4o al~Wui~~Af-f ) L& scram d 4d r [l 'f f c"I / jm~ Ln/ P U ~PC&~~'f
T) L~kc~ m~C4R, ~MA ~ ~ Y & +~~p~5[, g ~viCC. GmwceSro~ A '' C ~ ™~g
g pgp 5'y g +at 9 Jn Wp l$ grt/ C6 kc A
~p $g p~ ~ v4.e. G' pic g. ~g 'tU & '5 C 7~4 l i ~~( Q ~ Q ~~ gy p l ~W C3C~+ Z
~z+ MWNw Wd; t~7-lZS~L~ew a,3, f Z, ra, lC, ~V ~c ~~-
• 7j
_f
t4)L=_,_a+_ ,1,<_/<_7/,,.<.,.,.w _,.,,,,,_>,-,,,-<_
"_,_: a.3, %,v,/sq/:-,.,/, ,_d_.o.
OfBcc ofRegulatory StaKThe Consumer Services Division1441 Main StreetColumbia, SC 29201
October 16, 2006
Subject: An application by Wyboo UtiTities, Inc. for approval of a New Schedule ofCharges for Water and Sewer Rates, i.e. Docket No. 2005-13-WS,
I am submitting this letter to notify the Once of Regulatory Services (ORS) of two (2)speci5c problems that I have encountered withWyboo Plantation Utilities, lnc. (WPU)within the last few months, Both problems are service re1ated and are described brieflybelow as Incident No. 1 and Incident No.2:
Incident No. l occurred on May 30-31 of this year, after I was alerted by the alarm
system ot our (gray water) septic tanks that they were full a»d that their pote»tiallyimminent overflow would cause e81uent to back up into the ground level room of ourhome. Shortly thereafter, I was able to reach Mr. Mark Wrigley by telephone aud, aftersome dif5culty with him on the telephone, he agreed to come to my home to assess theproblem. Immediately upon his arrival, I took him to the site ofour septi: system tanks,which are located 24" to30" under the center ofa smaH grassy plot that is surrounded bya patio and a unique Charleston Garden at the rear ofour home. I cxplaumi to Mr.Wrigley that his instant proposal to bring in a piece of heavy equipment (backhoe) toexcavate the covers ofthe septic tanks was a totally unsatisfactory solution to ourproblem. I also explained to him, in detail, the reason why the introduction ofa largebackhoe to excavate in a small area —one that was interlaced extensively with an intricatematrix underground of drainage and sprinkler systems —would cause extensive damageto that infrastructure in w'hich we had invested many thousands of dollars, over a periodof5-6 years ofplanning and implementation. To my complete surprise IIQ greatdisappointment, Mr. Wrigley proved to be utterly intransigent to my counterproposal thatthe septic, tank covers be uncovered by hand-digging them —in the same manner as hadbeen done previously over the years at Wyboo Plantation —and that I would pay for anyadditional expense he might incur in doing so. To my consternation, Mr. Wrigley wasadamant that he wouhi neither 1.) have the area hand dug nor 2.) would he repair thedamage caused by using the backhoe to dig what amounted to three holes (using a sledgehammer to swat a Qy) in our yard. Despite my best e8brts, I was unable to persuade him
to assist us in protecting our property and our investraents in it including:
two (2) 4" Schedule 40 PYC pipes that connect gutters and downspout at the fourcorners of our house to carry rain water away &om the foundation ofour house,enabling us to maintain the integrity of our completely dry finished ground levelinterior space of approximately 1400 sq. 5.
~ two 4"-6ss perforated vinyl pipes and associated connectors to a system of in-
ground drain boxes that conduct excess water away f'rom our house and out ofour yard.
October ] 6, 2006
Office of Regulatory StaffThe Consumer Services Division
1441 Main Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Subject: An application by Wyb00 Utilities, Inc. for approval era New Schedule of
Charges for Water and Sewer Rates, i.e. Docket No. 2005-13-WS.
I am submitting this letter to notify the Office of Regulatory Services (ORS) of two (2)
specific problems that I have encouat rcdwith Wyboo Plantation Utiliti_.3, Inc. (WPU)within the last few months. Both problems are service rehted and are described briefly
below as Incident No.1 and Incident No.2:
Incident No.1 occurred on May 30-31 of this year, after I was alerted by the ahrm
system of 0ur-(gray water) septic tanks that they were full and that their potentiallyimminent overflow would cause effluent to back up into the ground level rooms of our
home. Shortly thereafter, I was able to reach Mr. Mark Wrigley by telephone and, after
some difficulty with him on the telephone, he agreed to come to my home to assess the
problem. Immediately upon his arrival, [ took him to the site of our sep_: system tanks,which are located 24" to30" under the center of a small grassy plot that is surrounded by
a patio and a unique Charleston Garden at the rear of our home. I explained to Mr.
Wrigley that his instant proposal to bring in a piece of heavy equipment (backhoe) toexcavate the covers of the septic tanks was a totally unsatisfactory solution to our
problem. I also explained to him, in detail, the reason why the introduction era largobackhoe to excavate in a small area - one that was interlaced extensively with an intricate
matrix underground ot_drainage and sprinkler systems - would cause extensive damageto that infl_structurc in which we had invested many thousands of doUars, over a period
of 5-6 years of planning and implementation. To my complete surpfi_ ee3d great
disappointment, Mr. Wrigley proved to be utterly intmmigent to my counterproposal that
the septic tank covers be uncovered by hand-digging them - in the same manner as had
been done previously over the years at Wyboo Plantation - and that I would pay for any
additional expense he might incur in doing so. To my consternation, Mr. Wrigley was
adamant that he would neither 1.) have the area hand dug nor 2.) would he repair the
damage caused by using the backhoe to dig what amounted to three holes (using a sledgehammer to swat a fly) in our yard. Despite my best efforts, I was unable to persuade him
to assist us in protecting our property and our investments in it including:
• two (2) 4" Schedule 40 PVC pipes that connect gutters and dowmpout at the fourcomers of our house to carry rain water away from the foundation of our house,
enabling us to maintain the integrity of our completely dry finished ground level
interior space of approximately 1400 sq. ft.
• two 4"-6" perforated vinyl pipes and associated connectors to a system of in-
ground drain boxes that conduct excess water away from our house and out of
our yard.
~ a professionally designed, instaUed and maintained imgation system, including
Schedule 40 PVC water pipes and numerous sprinkler heads.
~ two 2"Schedule 40 PVC pipes that are connected to three in4loor/ia carpet d ains
that axe installed in the ground-level floor ofour house, to keep that level Rom
wooding in the unhkely eveat ofa broken water supply line at the point of entry to
our house.
After concluding that an accord to protect our interests could not be reached with Mr.
Wrigley, I noti6ed him that I would make other arrangements to address our problem and
hc leit our property.
Immediately thereafter, I called James Septic Systems and they assured me that they
would come out to our house, pump out our tanks and put us in a position where we
could use water again (w/c's, kitchen, laundry, etc.).They were as good ss their word,
pumping the tanks ahngst immediately and mstalling a new pump within about 72 hours.
It should be noted that when they hand dug three small, neat straight-walled holes (aRer
carefully removing and putting aside the sod over the covers ofthe septic tanks) they did
so without damaging a siingle wire or pipe in our yard. Their mMlerstandng ofour plight
and the service they provided stood in sharp contrast to that ofMr. Wrigley.
g'jy j~ j (. report
Lake
healthI"g T(fi I ~ in our
I (AIp~
ut No.2 began when. approxhnately four months ago (circa May or Junc ofthai
I'M+ theWPU once m Sauhu; no staff were present, so I left
arne
to
a leak water main in)he median of thc roadway opposite . 5 Ridge
Drive. The leak caused a washout in the ground above that has 511ed in
water and xemaicmd ughout the summer .That water-Sled hole is alMmmi bemuse 1).it ls a '
lace for uitoes and 2). it iindicates a leak
water main that, in the event ofa dr essure, would provide an entry toria that couH contaminate the vtslter supp/ o ~boo Plantation. As no visible
actin was taken by WPU, I suhs8quentlynoti6ed the Bo ofDirectors and
Ahninistration hhmayr-of Cyboo Plantatlm of this hcaltht . t is my under-
standing that they-aotiled Mr. Wrigley, personaly, but still no visible appears to
have been. taken, As the "water hole" remained as ofOctober 5, almost two w ago, IMr. J.Petit ofDHEC's KQS; he assured me that he would look mto this miftm.
I hope that tlus and other constructive criticisms will lead soon to a less adversarial and
more constructive relationship between Mr. Wrigley/WPU and the homeowners at
Wyboo Phmtation.
ly,
ames L. Walsh
• a professionally designed, install©d and maintained irrigation system, includingSchedule 40 PVC water pipes and numerous sprinkler heads.
two 2" Schedule 40 PVC pipes that are connected to three in-floor/'m carpet d_mnsthat are installed in _ ground-level floor of our house,, to keep _s_ level _om
flooding in the unh3cely event of a broken water supply line st the point of entry to
our house•
After concluding that an accord to protect our interests could not be reached with Mr.
Wrigley, I notified him that I would make other arrangements to address our problem and
he left our property.
Immediately thereafter, I called James Septic Systems and they asmued r_© that they
would come out to our house, pump out our tanks and put us in a position where we
could use water again (w/c's, kitol_o, lamxlry, etc.). They were as good _s their word,
pumping the _ ahnost in_mcdia_y and installing a new pump within about 72 hours.It should be noted that when they hand dug three small, neat straight-walled holes (aftercarefully removing and putting aside the sod over the cove_s of the septic, tanks) they didso without damaging a single wire or pipe in our yard. Their _ig of our plight
and the service they provided stood in sharp contrast to t_t of Mr. Wrig|cy.
j ,_7---_, _nt No.2 began when. approximately four months ago (circa l_y o_ J_ of_/V / year), Fcall_ the WPU of_.e in S_, no staffwe_ In_..se_ so I le_ a me.to
_{ t_o report a leal_lh_ water ma_ m the median of tb¢ roadway opposite_l 5 Ridge
_ _ _ Lake Drive. The leak_nas..cansed a washout in the ground abo_ t.b_ has filled in
withwater hole a,_,: ._,_ , health hazard because 1). it is a bree_ing place _r_o_iuitoes and 2). it i_li_xtcs a leak
_ _ _ ( _ in our water main that, in the event of a_essure, would provide an en .l_y.to
_" acoon was taken by WPU, 1 is_luently notified the Bo_si_f Director,_ and
[ Adminkslxafion M_., ofWyboo Plantation of this hca_ _t_m my under-
/ -_ -__ standing that _..u6fifted Mr. Wrigley, pecsonally, but still no visible __ .pyars to,_---__.:2:_- have be__ As the "water hole" remained as of October. 5, almost two w-ee_ago, t
__tr. J. Petit ofDHEC'$ EQS; he assured me that he would look into this mat'ft_
_ I hope that flxis and other constructive criticisms--will lead soon to a less adversarial and
more constructive relationship between Mr. Wrigley/WPU and the homeowners at
Wyboo Plantation.
Account Number:
3AMES L WALSH TRUSTEE3AMES L WALSH REVOCaBLE TRUSTH RIDGE LAKE ORMANNING SC 29102-9S11
JAMKS L. WALSM, TRUSTERJAhIES L VfALSH REVOCASLF- YRUST14 RIPE LAKE OR VWQOO O'CANT'ATXXV
',MAl4NlhK'e SO 801&@1 g$- ~
r
.'5~$0 . ~ ~ «i'" ~'i&g c
Front of Item 0
NO gOO~IOrS Sg=sy~s&
aH ~~a~ ag-ag gGO SE l 0 +&cP. 4 "~Q &&~3.
(p ;/ ~ 4 I) g'Q ~-'&
3M M f& ~A R7 -W C~
~ ML4. 4 aAM~
Back of Item 0 , Amount;$175. 00,' Date'. 06&'QI/2006
1Z/11/2006 ank of Clarendon-Accoun Page 1 ot 1
AccountNumber:
3AMES LWALSH TRUSTEE]AMES L WAL_H REVOCABLE TRUST
14 RIDGE LAKEDRMANNING SC 29102-9511
BackofItem #!Amount:_75,00; Oate:.06/(Tt/2006
Page_,of I
lZ111/2006 "--'--'-----_ofClaren_
PfQl i-i'Klg
FA1. EA
FA
i.'. Eil
CQl(l!'f Ef'fT4 r'C 86 ' r23~~1 3 I:="'3c.Vi)SSKBER.'i AL8~38S4948
6 0!KffShf' 80, 9.':!".. Bfff,SHtbNi
0!-".'!3 '"i 'r '!l-' t~' AL'I~&, HER
f=LQRENCE„~C = 9"!~i I(8i!3: GF i='-.5i'-"!5
Bf.FB 80''CB DQLQD REF, f;ft:~"~fjg,f, ~g~.iiuHTt= R
. TE&f DESf f? YP'". ION
INIT BY: i S. Ph~L! IPSf OSLO ARF""3 15FT PUI&f&iCQ!TROL Hbl ~ QGOULIl I'R~Pf roc;,'PPLRS!'&'C LIQUID LCPEi. PLAPl'in'@ULG k!EÃi1".H I HP Bli5 F=."FLUMl' f&UtiP fi&i) i&~J856 I.68BJ- Rf-! l888'238 Ci'lBLf= !JE):Bl-IT@)
EYFERVL~L!"-Ri'.E l- R I CE
Dui!TG'!'A!
i-.;I"r~: Tr';:.rN Cf:l.&WT. Tr-;:~!7 STATE A~"
TOTA' C:-!AAGi.:.
psych' toy
'=.''' 7ow~ ~
fiuSTQlfEf! i%0. J08 !iG.JOB ffAKCflSTOffER NffK J(Pl~lEB SL=.'P I !.!:,' TAPIRS LL.CADDfff:";5 i i(~~"., H4VY '-68
lli-NN:f'll&, SC.- -"eS()ak~"R.VEO 87:
'' "&!- !-!-"-'i'."., '.".IPT,=. '~QlJl&OOIMH BL18KNES'"" f&ITI. txOf AP!6 COi fr-A 4Y '-'" Ql-" L!OXE=
t ~
__OLA_D C;OMP A_-IY
415 NORTH IRBY STR_E'F
FLORENCE_ BC :-'.9501
( 843 :, G6_-,52 ! 6
-- _3_
C
.- ,.:.-. _l,l B'I'O'i"Ai..,.":li_-.;__111 ............................................................................
30B It._E C.:_ "r Y "FA_.'.CIJ_'I'OIIEIINAME JAMES S_.'I:"I"",...., "rANKS LLC ]'N. (_C,LJNTY TAX
._,DDI_F,._ :;.1,331 HWY 2_60 ...... ' " 27 9"I'ATE TAX
I_iANNII'IG, ,SC.-"_9;l.(-'JP.: ..-_-._............ TOTtClI_ I.':HARGFI/C ':--"-_ ......
E_C_vEDB't'r--3. "-:-'3;::;---_:
IWTI WINK
JAMRS SKPTlC TANKS, Lt.C11CIE Highwey 80Mattning, SC RS102
Phone: (NS) 4T54677Fax: (868) 478.5208
Ctt stottt et' 9Ol'de. NO.
Neet
Address
eat. 4..J 5 . m) b4
. IIJ w COSH d.c.d CeJAtJGt OII JCC'I. IJICSI
I
. .l&.I bb . .I
I
I
II
I
I
ck~ '"~
' I'I
II
I
I
I
IJAIW 'I tel eetvteeNJ, Aeedg'4I ~~cytcv, IeSAJy ~,
IIccclvedar
G9CCeSe~pltllVtey IN IIS A
TAX
TOT'A I.
3lm3S93WIZ. Q3BZ
., .....'"
JAMESm'T¢ TANKS,LLC110_ HlghwwMkndng, SG_10=
Phone:(a08)478,,4677Fax: (eo,_)478-52og
Phone_
~anK or uarenaonAccount Number
3AMES L WALSH TRUSTEE3AMES L WALSH REVOCABLE TRUE14 RIDGE LAKE DRMANNING SC 29102-9511
JAILS L MARSH, TRUSTERJAhllaS L WALSH QEVOCAQLF TRUST
SFoRPP
1902N'~32
7'he Bank ef CIarenikig. ~.~;-„~~io» .".. '~pm41 Q~ 4 J 44 pg
Front of Item 0 mount:$1, 7ZT99, Date:OGfi/2006'
4rZE9636 Cpp~~
f;GAL Sank ref' &~C.8P~ 868 \ 4r ~gtR~i «t".'-& ~~. y 6P- -&c,ebAT 8'4 76 ~C 2404 PR ='09
~ ~ &~ZZ ~ W In, ~ ~ Ie ~ ~a ~ W s& ~ g g ~ ~ ee ~ c c ~ c ~ c gr ~
Back of Item Amount:$1, 727.99, Date:06/25/2006
1 11/Z00 Bank of Garendon-Aeeount Nutnber Pageto t
_anK o1"L.larenaon EAccountNumber_m_ll_
JAMES L WALSH TRUSTEEJAMESL WALSH REVOCABLETRUST14 RIDGE LAKE DRMANNING SC 29102-9511
Front of Item #__bAmount:$1,727".gg; Date'O6"fIS/2006
Back ofItem__l_b_ Amount:S1,?27".99,Dat'e:06_5/2006
12/1l)200_ BankofClarendon-AccountNu,_-_ _ Paget of,
From Wayne Peagler
Mannin S. C. 29102
70
Address-
Cily
Terms
STATEMENT
i
Account Number:
)AMES L WALSH TRUSTEECHES L WALSH RB/OCABLE TRUST14 RIDGE lAKE DRNANNING SC 29102-9511
PanRPPJAN 'Cpib"
.~ '
CsmIfgq/Mealy'j;"~7 g 4' ~+M+ ~~ i/eica ~4'~~e~ /
JAMES I WABASH %RUSTREJAMES t WALSH REYDCARLR TRUST~4 RIDGE LAICS DR.WYSOO PLANTAIN' , r
MANNrNC, SC 29102
488 PJZ= Q' AC-
1930
ge ~" cC.
I IOStElQIaIN ~
Front of Item 0:241201005000825, Amount:$220. 00, Date;08/08/200|I-
~AD P r.
~ P'Ac~ r yy, r,f-|"J
). r„.t t&e~~~ f)f
9OO8~80i8 TP CSS ~ST TT Ilgwu
Wd Q32lfg ~Q-IJQ Q00' OFZ 5 py
~e~CD~ g$7 & OCI
CD
6ack of Item 4 , Amount:$220. 00, Date:08/08/2006
12/ll/2006 Sank of Oarendon-AccoINt Number: Page1of1
AccountNumber:_
JAMES L WALSH TRUSTEEJAMES L WALSH REVOCABLETRUST14 RIDGE LAKE DRMANNING SC 29102-9511
The Bank of Clare
1930
Front of Item #:241201005000825, Amount:$220,O0, Date:08/0872006 ....
flO 9¢0_/80/8Ha00" OZZ
>roar[3 -_'t-u(] 6
fe _J _'d _;nD LES_3
O
(1_
Back of Item #1_ImmIBi, Amount:$220.O0, Date:08/08/2005
12111/2006 Bankof Oarendon-F,:_Lml:Number:.... _ Pege] of1
EUs:-L ORNEOFFICE OF REGULATORY STAFF
John F. BeachDirect dial: StJ3/343-1269
Qc'2 iVE
JAN 2 2 2OO'I
January 19, 2007 'IJIIISUhtER ~IX& ilEH&rtTfNENT
VIA HAND-DELIVERYMr, Chad Campbe]1Investigator, Consumer Services0ffice of Regulatory Staff1441 Main Street, 3' FloorColumbia SC 29201
RE: Complaint of James Walsh (Your File No. 06-S-3678)Wyboo Plantation Utiliiies, Inc. , ELS File No. 1015-10306
Dear Mr. Campbell:
I am writing on behalf of Wyboo Plantation Utilities, Inc. ("Wyboo") in response to the above-
referenced customer inquiry. This letter mostly appears to be a protest on the rate case.
Mr. Walsh's letters are extrcme)y he)pfu) in graphically demonstrating the cost and difficultyassociated with maintaining the STEP systems within Wyboo.
, , r The first problem Wyboo had with Mr. Walsh's situation is that his step system was not installedin accordance with utility specifications. The major problem is that Mr. Walsh had the systeminstalled in his bacl& yard, rather than his front yard. Mr, Walsh's, decision to locate the STEPsysteni in his back yard actually created most of not all of the problems he experienced.
~Mr. Wa)sh located his STEP system "24" to 30"under the center of a small grassy plot that is
surrounded by a patio and a unique Charleston Garden." While Wyboo makes every effort to
address customer problems in a way that has abso)utely no adverse impact on customer
landscaping, Mr. Walsh's STEP system was located in a p)ace that made it practical)y difficultfor Wyboo to do so here.
Mr. Walsh's located the STEP system in the baclc of his yard, which was about 80 feet farther
away from the Wyboo main than appropriate. This placement added approximately 10 to ) 5
additional head feet pressure to the pump requirements. With the head and additional length ofpipe, Mr. Wa) sh's pump has to worl& extra hard to pump his grey water out. ldis baclcyard is also
soaked with water, which could be a source of water infiltration to the step system and thc
additiona) problems with electrical shortage, due to improper installation.
ElliS, LawhOme 1| Sine, P.A. , Attcn~ at Law
1501 Main Street, 5th FlOOr PO BOX 2255 COlumbia, SOuth CarOlina 29202 503 254 4&90 ~ 803 779 4749 FaX ~ eltralaWhOrne. COm
ELLIS ORNE
JohnF. B=achDirect dial.'803/343-1269Lb.e,acl_,ellislawhorne.com
January 19, 2007
OFFICEOF REGULATORYSTAFF
VIA HAND-DELIVERY
Mr. Chad CampbellInvestigator, Consumer Services
Office of Regulatory Staff1441 Main S_eet, 3r_ Floor
Columbia SC 29201
RE: Complaint of James Walsh (Your FileNo. 06-S-3678)
Wyboo Plm_tationUtilities,Inc.,ELS FileNo. 1015-I0306
Dear Mr. Campbell:
I am writing on behalf of Wyboo Plantation Utilities, Inc. ("Wyboo") in response to the above-
referencedcustomer inquiry,This lettermostlyappearstobe aproteston theratecase.
Mr. Walsh's letters are extremely helpful in graphically demonstrating the cost and difficulty
associated with maintaining the STEP systems within Wyboo.
The first problem Wyboo had with Mr. Walsh's situation is that his step system was not installed
in accordance with utility specifications. The major problem is that Mr. Walsh had the system
installed in his back yard, rather than his front yard. Mr. Walsh's_dccision to locate the STEPsystem in his back yard actually cieated most ofno_ all of the problems he experienced.
{Mr. Walsh located his STEP system "24" to 30" under the center of a small grassy plot that is
/ _ _ ,!_ surrounded by a patio mid a unique Charleston Oardcn." While Wyboo make, s every effort to'¢[ ,_ ....'..:._ _ address customer problems il_ a way that has absolutely no adverse impact on customer
4f• landscaping, Mr. Walsh s STEP system was located in a place that made it practically difficult
forWyboo todo so here.
Mr. Walsh's locatedthe STEP system infileback of hisyard,which was about 80 feet farther
away from theWyboo main than appropriate.Thisplacement added approximately 10 to 15
additionalhead feetpressuretothepump requirements.With the head and additionallengthof
pipe,Mr. Walsh's ptanp has towork extrahardto pump hisgreywater out. His backyardisalso
soakedwithwater,which could be a sourceofwater infiltrationtothe stepsystem and the
additionalproblems with electricalshortage,due to improper installation.
Ellis,Lawhome& Sims, RA., Atlon'leysat Law
1501 Main Street, 5lh Floor ,,= PO Box 2285 =- Columbia, SouthCarolina 29202 ,= 803 254 4190 m 803 779 4749 Fax m ollislawhorne.com
Mr. Chad CampbellJanuary 19, 2007Paa.2
Mr. Wrigley states that when he went to Mr. Walsh's house to look at and check for systembreakdown and probe his front yard for lus system, Mr. Walsh confronted him out in front of hishouse. When Mr. Wrigley asked Mr. Walsh where the tank was located, Mr. Walsh informedhim the taiN was in the back of the house and stated that Wyboo could not bring equipment inhis yard. Mr, Wrigley told Mr. Walsh that he may need to and wouId not be responsible for anytracks that might be leA. Mr. Walsh then reiterated that Wyboo was not to bring any equipmentinto his yard. Mr. Walsh then told Mr. Wrigley that the tank was located only 3"below ground.They both walked around and down the hill to the back of his house.
Mr. Wrigley reports that he was at Mr. Walsh's house approximately tlu ee hours that day,probing and hunting for his tanlc, but never could find the system. Mr. Wiigley could not verifythe depth and therefore, Mr. Walsh said not to worry, that he would find the tank and call Mr,Wrigley. Mr. Walsh then decided he would take care of the problem himself. Mr. Wiigleyreports that he never heard back from Mr. Walsh until receiving the December 2l, 2006 noticefrom the ORS.
Mr. Walsh brought this same issue up in the night hearing. 13e also read the v hole letter to theCoininission and then submitted same.
Mr, Walsh's service has been established and he is continuing to receive sewer service from theutility with no interruptions. It is Wyboo's hope that the explanation set forth in this letter willfully satisfy this customer's concerns. Wyboo is willing to continue these discussions in order tobring this matter to a final resolution.
With kind regains, I am
Yours truly,
cc: Florence Belser, EsquireMr. Mark S. Wrigley
J inF, Beach
Mr. Chad Campbell
January 19, 2007
hg _2
Mr. Wrigley states that when he went to Mr. Walsh's house to look at and check for systembreakdown and probe his front yard for his system, Mr. Walsh confronted him out in front of his
house. When Mr. Wrigley asked Mr. Walsh where the tank was located, Mr. Walsh informed
him the ta,_k was in the back of the house and stated that Wyboo could not bring equipment in
his yard. Mr. Wrigley told Mr. Walsh that he may need to mid would not be rosponsiblc for any
tracks that might be left'. Mr. Walsh then reiterated that Wyboo was not to bring any equipment
into his yard. Mr. Walsh then told Mr. Wrigley that the tank was located only 3" below ground.They both walked around and down the hill to the back of his house.
Mr. Wrigley reports that he was at Mr. Walsh's house approximately tlu'ee horn's that day,
probing and hunting for his tank, but never could find the system. Mr. Wrigley could not verifythe depth and therefore, Mr. Walsh said not to worry, that he would find the tm_k and call Mr.
Wrigley. Mr. Walsh allen decided he would take care of the problem himself. Mr. Wligleyreports that he never heard back from Mr. Walsh until receiving the December 2 ], 2006 noticefrom theORS.
Mr. Walsh brought this same issue up in the night hearing. He also read the whole letter to theCottunission and then submitted same.
Mr. Walsh's service has been established and h¢ is continuing to receive sewer service fTom the
utility with no interruptions. It is Wyboo's hope that the exp)m_ation set forth in fills letter will
fully satisfy this customer's concerns. Wyboo is willing to continue these discussions in order tobring this matter to a final resolution.
With kind regm_Is, I am
CC; Florence Belser, Esquire
Mr. Mark S. Wrigley
Yours truly,
ch
Clarendon CountyPlanning 8 Public Service Commission
Post Office Box 1250, Manning. SC 29102Telephone: (803) 435-8672 / 435-2105 Fax: (803) 435-2208
February 20, 2007
To: Mr. Jim Walsh14 Ridgelake DriveLot¹ 3Manning, S.C. 29102
From: William TaylorClarendon County
Mr. Walsh:On August 29, 1997, A Certificate of Occupancy was issued for this residence.
That indicates, that the residence met the requirements of Clarendon County to be in
compliance the current building codes adopted by the County. This includes the waterand sewer connections.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
Building Official
/ Clarendon County
Plannin_ _ Public Service CommissionPost Office Box 1250, Manning. SC 29102
Telephone: (803) 435-8672/435-2105 Fax: (803) 435-2208
February 20, 2007
To: Mr. Jim Walsh
14 Ridgelake DriveLot# 3
Manning, S.C. 29102
From: William Taylor
Clarendon County
Mr. Waish:
On August 29, 1997, A Certificate of Occupancy was issued for this residence.
That indicates, that the residence met the requirements of Clarendon County to be in
compliance the current building codes adopted by the County. This includes the waterand sewer connections.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
William T_ylor
Building Official
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS —ORDER «'O. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26. 2007
out of time by John C. Bruffcy, Jr. and Deer Creek Plantation Properties, Inc, , but the
Corntnfssion denied this Petition as untimely.
The Commission held a local public hearing in this docket on Monday, October 30
06, at 6 p.m. in the Chrendon County Courthouse in lvfanning, South Carolina. at which
public iestimony relating to the requested rate increase was offered, Thereafter, a hearing
on the merits was held January 22 through January 24, 2007, in the offices of the
Commission. John F. Beach, Esquire appeared on behalf of WPV, Wendy Cartledge,
Esquire and C. Lessie Harnmonds, Esquire appeared on behalf of the Office of Regulatory
Staff ("ORS"). Robert E. Tyson, Jr. , Esquire appeared on behalf of intervenor The Villas
at Wyboo Property Owners Association ("The Villas"), ' Charles H. Cook, Esquire and
Scott Elliott, Esquire appeared on behalf of intervenor Wyboo Plantation Owners
Association, inc, ("Homeowners" ).
SUMMARY OF REQUESTED RELKF
The Commission, in Docket No. 96-227-W, Order No. 1996-757, previously
established a water rate of $1$.00 per month for all of WPU's customers, The Order
further approved a $10.X monthly irrigation charge, but it did not establish n water tap
fee. In Docket No. 97-391-S.Order No. 1998-33, the Commission established a sewer rate
of $20.00 per month for all of WPU's customers and established a sewer tap fee of
$500.00. In the application now before the Commission, WPU seeks to increase its
residential water rate to $67,00 per month and its residential irrigation rate to $25.00 per
' Prior to ihc hearing, counsel for WPU and the Villas advised thc Commission that they hsd reached a
stipuhsion with respect to the rates payable by the Vil!as. Generally, the stipulation provides that the Villss
at Wyboo condominium units, sales office. laundry. pool showers and restrooma would he billed at one
single. family equivalent' thc assembly hall »onld be billed at a rare af one and a half times a single. family
eaulvslen'. Tne snanager's residence would be billed ai a residential rate. The Commission memorializcs thc
s of the stipulation herein for «pp] ication to current and future rates.
DOCKET NO. 2005.13-WS - ORDER NO. 2007-138
FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 2
out of time by John C. Bruffey, Jr. end Deer Creek Plantation Properties, Inc., but ,,he
Commission denied this Petition as untimely,
The Commission hem a local public hearing in this docket on Monday, O¢to_,._30|
_006, at 6 p.m. in the Clarendon County Courthouse in Manning, South Carolina. at whiqh
j)u'oli¢ testimony relating to zhe requested _te increase was offered., Thereafter, a hearing
on the meritswas held January22 thToughJanuary24, 2007, in the officesof the
Commission. John F. Beach,Esquireappearedon behalfof WPU. Wendy Cartledge,
Esquireand C.LessieHarnmonds,E_uirc appemed on behalfoftheO_ce ofRegulatory'
Staff("ORS"). RobertE.Tyson,Jr,,E_uire appearedon behalfofinlervenorThe Villas
atWyboo PropertyOwners Association("TheVillas").t CharlesFL Cook, Esquireand
ScottElliott,Esquireappeared on behalfof imervenorWyboo PlantationOwners
Association,Inc.("Homeowners").
SUMMARY OIFREQUESTED RELIEF
The Commission,in Docket No. 96.227-W, Order No. 1996-757,previously
establisheda waterrateof$18.00per month forallof WPU's customers.The Order
furtherapproveda $10.00monthlyirrigationcharge,butitdidnot establisha watertap
fee.InDocketNo. 97.391-S.OrderNo. 1998-33.theCommission establisheda sewerrate
of $20.00per month forallof WPU's customersand establisheds sewer tap fee of
$500.00. In the applicationnow beforethe Commission,WPU seeksto ittcrcaseits
resldcntlalwaterrateto$67.00permonth and itsresidentialirrigationrateto$25.00per
Priorto _heheating, counsel for WPU and the Villas advbed thQCommission that _y had reachedastlpu_ton with respectto the razespayable bydie Villas. Generally,the stipulationprovidesthatthe Villasat Wybooco_dominiemunits, sales office, laundr/, pool showerserd restrooma would be billed st oneslng|e.faml]yeqtfivalent;the assembly"hall w_3uldbe billed ata rateof one anda ha]ftimes e _i,g]e.familyeauh'alen:._qe menageT'iresidencewould bebilled ala residentialrate. TheCo._mi;sionmemorializesthete_s of the stipulation I_erein for eqTp]icat_n to current _md _tur¢ rates.
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-%S—ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007
3
inonth. In addition, the Company seeks to establish cornrnercial and mobile homes rates
together urith connection fees, a plant impact fee and a disconnection!reconnection fee.
WPU further seeks to increase its sewer service rate to $75.00 a month, establish
corntnercial and/or rnobilc home rates, increase its sewer service connection fec, establish a
plant impact fcc for new sever customers, establish swimming pool water fccs and
establish a disconnection/reccnnection fee. In addition. the Com anv seclcs to establish,
inter alia, fees for maintenance, repair and z.placement of certain of its wastevifater
SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY
itness
At the local public hearing in Manning„South Carolina on Monday, October 30,
2006, tbe Commission heard from a large number of public witnesses in opposition to
WPU's application for rate relief. At the beginning of -.he proceedings on January 22, the
Comtnission heard from two public witnesses, both customers of WPU residing in
Clarendon County. Thereafter, in the course of the hearing held January 22-24s 2007, the
Commission heard from witnesses presented by parties to the case. Mark S. Wrigleyr
President and sole owner of WVPU, testified for thc Company, WPU also called as
witnesses %illie J, Morgan, Christina L. Scale, and Douglas H. Carlisle, Jr. , all of the
ORS. Morgan, Scale, and Carl isle all appeared under compulsion of subpoena, Dwight D.
Samuels, Daniel L. McDonald, and Leo C. Gallagher testified on behalf of the
Homeowners. The ORS presented the testimony of Robert A. Stembcrg. a WPU customer
and a residential building contractor, and Morgan, Program Manag™r for the Water and
Wastewater Department of ORS,
DOCKET NO, 2005-13-WS - ORDER NO. 200%138FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 3
month. Inaddition,theCompany seekstoestablishcommercialand mobilehomes rates
togetbet,x_thconnectivnfees,a plantimpactfeeand a disconnectiortPreconncctlonfee.
WPU furtherseeksto incrumscitssewer scrvlccrateto $75.00 a month, establish
commercialand'ormobilehome rates,increaseitssewerserviceconnectionfee,establisha
plantimpactfee for new sewer customers,establishswimming pool water feesand
establisha di_onnectiort/reccr_ectior_fee.Inaddition,theCompany seekstoestablish,
inter alia, fees for maintenance, reptfir and _placement of certain of its w,astewater&,. ,
treatment facilities.
SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY
Overvi .eyvof Wit.n.essgs
tAt the local public hearing in Manning, South Carolina on Monday, October 30,
2006. the Commission heard from a large number of public witnesses in opposition to
WPU's application for rate relief. At "the beginning of-he proceedings on January 22, the
Commission heard from two publicwlmemes, both customersof WPU residingIn
ClarendonCounty. Thereafter,inthecourseofthehearingheldJanua,5,22-24,2007,the
Commission heardfrom witnessespresentedby partiestothecase. Mark S. Wrigley,
Presidentand soleowner of WPU, testifiedforthe Company. WPU alsocalledas
witnessesWillieJ.Morgan, ChristinaL, Scale,and DouglasH. Carlisle,Jr,,allof the
ORS. Morgan,Seale_ andCarlisle allappearedundercompulsionofsubpoena,DwightD.
Samuels,Daniel L. McDonald, and Leo C. Gallaghertestifiedon behalfof the
Homeowners. The ORS presentedthe_esllmonyofRobertA. Steinberg,a WPU customer
and a residentialbuildingcontractor,and Morgan, Program Manager forthe Water and
Wastewater Department of ORS.
DOCKET NO, 2005-13-WS —ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAG 4
Discnsslo of Wltn s Testimony
The public witness testimony heard at the cominuation of the Commission's
hearmgs on January 22, 2007, was fairly representative of the testimony heard by the
Commission ai the October 30, 2006 hearing. The first public witness, James McBridc,
testified as to his poor customer service experience with WPU. Spcciflcally, McBridc
testified that when he called the Company to fix a malfunctioning sewer pump, it did not
supply the float needed for the repair for over onc month. In the meantime, McBride was
requhed to start and stop his sewer pump manually. After WPU delivered and installed the
part, thc Company rewed to perform the remaining electrical reps'irs required to make the
system fully operational and declined to reimburse McBridc for expenses associated with
finishing the repair to the systcrn and restoring his yard to its original condition. In support
of his assertion that the Com any should have been responsible for bearing all of the repair
costs, McBrtdc presented documentary evidence in the form of the s:ock purchase
greemeni by which the utility was purchased by the present owner. The document
indicated that the utili was to be res nsible for "the iliii $,
elis and lines, and sever lines, lift stations, treatment facilitics, and cv .. th r
corn nant of the systems o crated by 4'yboo Utilitics. " {I/22t07 Transcri
7), The parties declined to cross-examine McBride.
The next public witness, Mi. James Stites, testified that he had also observed poor
customer service by the Company, and suggested that no rate increase should bc perntined
until WPU had irnprovcd customer service and corrected any other deficiencies.
The first witness called by VPU to the stand was Mark wrigley, the President and
owner of the Company. Wrigley testified that he had purchased the utility in March 2001,
DOCKETNO. 2005-13-W8 - ORDER NO. 2007-138
FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 4
/
Discussion of Wimua l"__timony
The public witness testimony he_d at the cominuatiou of the Commission's
hearings on January 22, 2007, was fairly representative of the testimony heard by the
Commission at the Octobgr 30, 2006 hatting. The first l:ubtie witness, James McBride,
testified as to his poor customer service experience with WPU. Speciflcal[y, McBride
testified that when he called the Company to fix a malfunctioning sewer pump, it did not
supply the float needed for the repair for over one month. In the meantime, McBride was
requ_ed to start and stop his sewer pump man_lly. After WPU delivered and installed the
part, the Company refused to perform the remaining electrical repa_.rs requized to make the
system fully operational and declined to reimburse McBride for expenses associated vdth
finishing the repair to the system avd restoring his yard to its original condition. In support
of his assertion that !he Company should have been responsible for bearing all ofth¢ r_air
costs, McBfldc presented documentaD' evidence in the form of the _ook purchaseL
_tgreement by which the utility was purchased by t_ present ow_. r.. The ¢loeumem
indicated that the utility was to be responsible for "the mainten_n__e _f _u ,,,_,.- l_tLrn_,
p_flls and lines, and sew¢r lines, lift stations, treatment facilities, end every other
component of the systems operated by Wyboo Utilities." (1/22/07 Transcript. p. 14: II 1._
7). The parties declined to eross-oxamine McBride.
The next publtc witness, Mr..;ames $tites, testified that he had also observed poor
customer service by the Company. attd st_ggested that no ra_e increase should be permitted
until WPU had improved customer service and corrected any other deficiencies.
The first witness callo:l by WPU to the stand was Mark Wrigley, the President and
owner of the Company. Wrigley tostiflP.d that be had purchased the utility in March 2001,
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS - ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAQE 8
increases, WPU moved to have the Commission admit Maready's prefilcd testimony into
evidence, but in response to the Homeowners' objection. the Conunission ruled that
Maready's testimony was inadmissible hearsay and denied WPU's motion to have it
admitted, To support ita case for a rate increase, WPU then elected to rely upon the
testimony of its owner, Wrigley, and the three ORS witnesses it had placed under
subpoena, rather than to retain a new expert te testify at trial following Maready's death.
The time constraints imposed upon both the parties and the Commission by the six-month
statutory deadline contained in S.C. Code Ann. p8-5-240(C) for issuance of the
Commission's order in the present docket undoubtedly would have hindered WPU's
efforts to retain and prepare a new expert witness for appcaI ce at trial. see S.C. Code
Ann. 5$-5-240(C).
Morgan, ORS' Water and Wastewater Department Program Manager, was called
by WPU to support its request to shi8, the burden of the operation, maintenance, repair and
replacentent of the Company's STEP system from WPU to its customers ~Mor 'rn,
however, testified to the fact that by virtue of its operating permit with the South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), WPLr was responsible for the
operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of all system components of the STEP
s stems at WPU's expense. Morgan's testimony made clear that he and the ORS o sed
shiAin the burden of maintaining and re airi these s stems to the rate a ers refiled
testimon of Mor at Pa e 16, t. 3 —P 17, I. 12. Morgan further offered that the
evidence of record reflects that DHEC has rated WPU's water and wastewater systems as
unsatisfactory, and the Cornrnission finds that this testimony is
DOCKETNO.2005-13-WS - ORDER NO. 2007-138
FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 8
irmmases. WPU moved to have the Commission admit Mamady's prefilcd *¢stimony into
evidence, but in response to the Homeowners' objection, the Commission ruled that
Mexeady's testimony was inadmi_l¢ he_y end denied WPU'z motion to have it
admired. To support its cane for a rote increase, WPU thep. clotted to rely upon the
t_stimony of its owner, Wrigley, and the three ORS witnesses it had placed under
subpoena, rather than to retain a new expert to testify at trial following Maready's death.
The time constraints imposed upon both the parties and the Commission by the six-month
statutory deadline contained in S.C. Code Ann. §58-5-240(C) for issuance of the
Commission's order in the present docket undoubtedly would have hindered WPU's
efforts to retain mad prepare a new ©Xl_rt witness for appearance at trial, see 8.C, Code
_. 5s.s-24o(c_.
Morgan, ORS' Water and Wab-tewamr Department Program Manager, was called
by WPU to support its request to shift the burden ofthe operation, msintenance, repair and
replacement of the Company's STEP system from WPU to its customet_ Mor_lan,
however, testified to the fact that by virtue of its operating permit with the South Carolinai
J
Department of Health and Enviroam_tel C_trol (DHEC), WPU was responsible for theII
operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of ell system ¢omponents of the STEPi I
t
ssvsteme at WPU's expense. Morgan's testimony made clee.r that he and the ORS opposed
-shiftinlilthe burden of maintaining and repaitir_ these systernsto the rate payers (ptefiled ..
Lestimon_, of Mor_m at Paf;e 16, [. 3 - Pase 17, 1. 12). Morgan further offered that the
evidence of record reflects that DHEC has rar.cd WPU's water and waatewater systems t,s
unmtisfactory, mad the Commission fmcb that this testimony is both _,_;hl_ :,,,4 ,,,t ....
J_its evaluation. (preffied testimony of Morg_, page 11, and Exhibit WJM-5).
/
DOCKET YO. 2005-13-WS —ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007PA F1
5, Customer account records ate maintained in both ledger fortns and
Quick3ooks software. ; he two accounting systems do not reconcile.
6, Cotnpla'. nt records do not have a resolution provided on the compla!nt form
as required pursuant to 26 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. l03-516, 103-538, 103-
716 and 103-738.
7. Complaint records ("Work Order System Report" ) show customers being
required to make an unauthorized payment to a Mr. Edd!e Barrett, not
WPU, for repair work on the Septic Tarmac Effluent Pump ("STEP") systems.
Mr. Barrett has been listed as an employee of WPU in its ftlings; however,
he has been treated as an independent contractor by the Company.
8. WPU does not maintain proper procedures to ensure complainants are
notified that O'Ptf is under Commission jurisd]etion as required by
Cornrnlssion regulations.
9. Customer billing format does not include a rate schedule as required by 26
SC Code Ann. Regs. 103-532,1(d) and 103-732.2(d),
10. 'PU has char ed rates e ttot authorized b the Commission.
During the ORS Business Audit, the followin una roved rates and
charges were discovered:
i, Overcharge of the tap fee for establishing sewer service;
ii. Tap fee charged fo. establishing water service;
iii. Cut-on fee;
iv Cut-oA' fee;
v. IHegal water use fee;
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS - ORDI_K NO. 2007-138
FEBRUARY 26,2007
P_A(}F._I5
p
,
_q
9.
Customer azcount r_ords are maintainedin both l_g_ forms and
QuickBookssoftware.The two aocountingsystemsdo notr_onoile.
Compiaintrecordsdo nothavea resolutionprovidedon thecomplaim form
asrequiredpursuantto26 $.C.Code Ann. Regs, 103-516,103-538,103-
716 _d I03-738.
Complaintrecords("Work Order SystemReport")show cus_ome,'sbeing
required to make an unauthorized payment to a Mr. Eddic Barrett, not
WPU, for repair work on t.hc Septic Tank E.ffluc_t Pump ("STEP") systems.
Mr. Barrett hasbeen list_Iasanemploy_ ofWPU initsfilings,however,
he hasbeentreatedasan independentcontra_.torby theCompany.
WPU do_ not mainlainproperp._oc_uresto ensurecomplainantsare
nolifiedthatWPU is under Commission jurisdictionas requiredby
Commissionregulations.
Customerbillingformatdoesnotincludea ratescheduleasrequiredl_y26
SC Code Ann. Regs.I03-532.I(d)and I03-732.2(d).
_TPU has chargedrates_d char__esnot authorizedby the Commission.
During the ORS BusinessAudit,the following_napprovcd rate_and
chargesweredlscov_ed:#,o
i. Oven'chargeoft_hetapfeeforestablishingscw_ _crvicc;
ii. Tap fccchargedfor establishingwater.sea:vice;
iii. Cut-onice;
iv Cm-offf_c;
v. Illegalwater us_f_e;
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS —ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007
6
vi. Water Service for Pool charges;
vii. Impact fee;
viii. DHEC sewer fee;
ix. Charges to customers for repair to sewer STEP system
Charges to customers for repair to utility water system; and
xi. Double charging of DHEC Safe Drinking Water Act ("SDWA") fec
for same location.
11. The SDWA fee authorized by DHEC and collected by WPU is not managed
properly. During the test year, WPU collected over $14,000 in SDWA fees
by bilhng customers at a rate of $3.50 per month per mobile home park
customer and $2.3$ per month per residential customer in the Manning area.
DHEC invoiced WPU in June 2005 for $9,852 for its SDWA fees. WPU
recorded a payment to DHEC in the amount of $9,$52. As set forth in S,C.
Code Ann. Section 44-55-120 (Supp. 2005), SDWA lies collected &om
customers can only bc used to pay DHEC for oversight of the drinking
water system. WPU did not provide support that the remaining balance of
$4, 148 was cscrowcd in a separate account for subscqucnt DHGC billings.
In addition, ORS could not determine if customer fees were subsequently
reduced to offset this ovcrwollcction.
12. Deposits are not refunded pursuant to 26 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 103-531.5
and 103-731,5.
13. Interest payments on deposits are not made to customers pursuant to 26 S.C.
Code Ann. Regs. 103-531.2(B) and 103-731.2(8).
DOCKET NO. 2005- !3-WS - ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 16
II.
12.
13.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
X.
xi.
Water Service for Pool charges;
Impact fee;
DHEC sewer fee;
t Charges to customers for repair to sewer STEP sy_mi, r
Charges to customers for repair to utility water system; and
Double charging of DHEC Safe Drinking Water Act (**SDWA") fe¢
for same location.
The SDWA fee authorized by DHEC and collected by WPU is not managed
properly. During the test year, WPU collected over $14,000 in SDWA fees
by billing customers at a rate of $3.50 per month per mobile home perk
customer and $2.38 per month per residential customer in the Manning area.
DHEC invoiced WPU in June 2005 for $9,852 for its SDWA fees. WPU
recorded a payment to DHEC in the amount of $9,852. As set forth in S.C.
Code Ann. Section 44-55-120 (Supp. 2005), SDWA fees collected from
customers can only be used to pay DHEC for oversight of the drinking
water system. WPU did not provide support that the remaining balance of
54,148 was escrowed in a separate account for subsequent DHEC billings,
In addition, ORS could not determine if customer fees were subsequently
reduced to offset this over-collection.
Deposits are not refunded pursuant to 26 S.C. Code Ann. Kegs. 103-531.5
and 103-731.5.
Interest payments on deposits are not made to customers pursuemt to 26 S.C.
Code Ann. Regs. 103-531.2(B) and 103-731.2(B).
.o
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS —ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007
customer service; Wrigley offers little or no rebuttal to the customers' complaints. Due to
a lack of credible evidence to support a rate increase and insufficient credible data from
which we can calculate a true operating margin, the Commission readopts the operating
margins established in the prior rate proceeding and denies the requested rate increase.
Our decision in this proceeding does not in any way preclude WPU from again
seeking rate relief at a future time. However, it is imperative that WPU come into
compliance with all applicable regulations and correct any and all other deficiencies, and
such compliance would be of significant importance to the Commission in consideration of
any future request for rate relief.
The Commission takes notice, however, that no water tap fee has been previously
established for the Company. The Commission adopts in %is Order water tap fees as
follows: $825 for a '/i inch connecuon, $965 for a 1 inch connection, and $1,145 for a 2
inch connection. This tap fee shall cover all costs of material and cquiptnont, labor and
boring. The Commission further approves an increase in the authorize sewer connection
fce from the previously authorized $500 to $825. Thcsc fccs may only bc charged when
the Company physically connects a customer or developer to its water or wastewater
system. Tap fccs may only be collected once for each property, and either the builder or
the resident of the home may bc charged a tap fee, but not both, The Commission
emphasizes that these are the only fees associated with water or sewer connection which
are authorized. Similarly, with regard to WPU's request that it be rmitted to ass on the
costs of repairing STEP systems to the affected individual homeowners, the Commission
lines to authorize such a charge.
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-WS - ORDER NO. 2007-138
FEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 19
customer service; Wrigley offers liule or no rebutud to the customers' complaints. Due to
a lack of credible evidence to support a rate increase and insufficient credible data from
which wc can calculate a tru¢ operatin_ margin, the Commission readopts the operating
margins established in the prior rate proceeding and dei_ies the requested rate increa._.
Our decision in this proceeding does not in any way preclude WPU from again
seeking rate relief ax a furore time. However, it is imperaXive that WPU come into
compliance with all applicable regulations and correct any and all other deficiencies, and
such compliance would be of significant importance to the Commission in consideration of
any future request for rate relief.
The Commission takes notice, however, that no water tap fee has been previously
established for the Company. The Commission adopts in this Order water tap fees as
follows: $g25 for a ¾ inch connection, $965 for a 1 inch connection, and $1,145 for a 2
inch conneclion. This tap fee shall cover all costs of materlal and equipment, labor and
boring. The Commission further approves an increase in the authorized sewer connection
fee from the previously authorized $500 to $825. These fees may only be charged when
the Company physically connects a customer or developer to its water or wastewater
system. Tap fees may only be collected once for each propcr_y, and either the builder or
the resident of the home may be charged amp fee, but nox both. The Commission
emphasizes thal these are the only fees associated with water or sewer connection which
are authorized. Similarly, with regard to WPU's request that it be pertained Io pass on the ,
costs of repairing STEP systems to the affected individual homeowners, the CommissionW" _s
__leclines to authorize such a charge.
DOCKET NO. 2005-13-%S—ORDER NO. 2007-138FEBRUARY 26, 2007
IT IS THRREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The application of WPU for an increase in rates and charges for water and
wastewater services and for an extension of its service area is hereby denied and the
application dismissed.
2. The applicant WPU shall correct all violations of the statutes, rules and
regulations pertaining to water and sewer utilitics and shall bring itself into full compliance
with all applicablc statutes, rules and regulations.
3. The Commission adopts water tap fees as follows: $825 for a '/i inch
connection, $965 for a 1 inch connection, and $1,145 for a 2 inch connection. This tap fec
shall cover all costs of material and equipment, labor and boring. The Commission further
approves an increase in the authorized sewer connection fee from the previously authorized
$500 to $825. These fees may only be charged when the Company physically connects a
customer or developer to its water or wastewater system. Tap fees may only be collected
once for each property, and either thc builder or the resident of the home may be charged a
tap fee, but not both. The Commission emphasizes that these are the only fees associated
with water or sewer connection which are authorized.
4. The applicant WPU shall continue to owir, operate, maintain and repair all
STEP systems and all of its water and wastewater trcanncnt facilities at its o~~ cx use as
required herein.
5 As stipulated by the parties, thc Villas at Wyboo condominium units, sales
office, laundry, pool showers and restrooms shall be billed at one single-family equivalent;
the assembly hall shall be billed at a rate of one-and~half-times a single-family
equivalent; and the manager's residence shall be billed at a residential rate.
DOCKET Nro. 2005-13-WS - ORDER. NO. 2007.13gFEBRUARY 26, 2007PAGE 20,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
l. The application of WPU for an increase in rates and charges for water and
wastewater services and for an extension of its service area is hereby denied and the
applicmion dismissed.
2. The applicant WPU shall correct all violations of the statutes, rules and
regulations pertaining to water and sewer utilities and shall bring itself into full compliance
with all applicable statutes, rules and regulations.
3. The Commission adopts water tap fees as follows: $825 for a 3/, inch
connection, $965 fora 1 inch connection, and $1,145 for a 2 inch connection. This tap fee
shall cover all costs of material and equipment, labor and boring. The Commission further
approves an increase in the authorized sewer connection fee from the previously authorized
$500 to $825. These fees may only be charged when the Company physically connects a
customer or developer to im water or wastewater system. Tap fees may only be collected
once for each property, and either the builder or the resident of the home may be charged a
tap fee, but not both. The Commission emphasizes thatthese are the only fe_ associated
with water or sewer connection which are authorized.
4. The applicant WPU shall continue to own, operate, maintain and repair all
STEP systems and all of its water and wastewater _reatrnem facilities at its o_a exj_en_ei
_quired hexein..
5 As stipulated by the parties, the Villas at Wyboo condominium units, sales
office, laundry, pool showers and restrooms shall be billed at one single-family equivalent;
the assembly hall shall be billed at a rate of one-and-one-half-times a single-family
equivalent; and the manager's residence shall be billed al a residential rote.
/