wireless and mobile computing

8/13/2019 Wireless and Mobile Computing

1/44

Wireless andMobile Computing

Prepared by First Consulting Group

October 2001


2/44

Wireless andMobile Computing

Prepared for:

C ALIFORNIA HEALTHC ARE FOUNDATION

Prepared by: Fran Turisco and Joanna CaseFirst Consulting Group

October 2001


3/44

AcknowledgmentsThis report was written byFran Turisco and Joanna Caseof First Consulting Groups applied research department,Emerging Practices. They would like to acknowledgethe assistance of Hal Gilreath of ArcStream Inc., whocontributed through an interview and review of the draftmanuscript; Bill Marshall and Ralph Clements from FirstConsulting Groups Doghouse Technology Services; and Jane Metzger and Erica Drazen from First Consulting GroupsEmerging Practices for thoughtful review comments incor-porated into the final document.

The California HealthCare Foundation, a private philan-thropy based in Oakland, California, focuses on critical issuesconfronting a changing health care marketplace by supporting innovative research, developing model programs, and initiating meaningful policy recommendations.

The iHealth Reports series focuses on emerging technology trends and applications and related policy and regulatory developments.

Additional copies of this report and other publications in

the iHealth Report series can be obtained by calling theCalifornia HealthCare Foundations publications line at1-888-430-2423 or visiting us online at www.chcf.org .

ISBN 1-929008-72-4Copyright 2001 California HealthCare Foundation


4/44

Contents5 Overview

7 Purpose

8 I. What Is Mobile Computing?Three Data Transfer Options

Mobile Computing Devices

Current Technology Issues and Limitations

Technology Selection ConsiderationsFuture Directions for Wireless Technology

19 II. Applications:What Mobile Computing DoesSeven Applications of Mobile Computing

Inpatient Care Solutions

Outpatient Care Solutions

26 III. Implementation Considerations:Benefits, Issues, Risks, and Tactics

The Benefits of WirelessThe Problem of Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)

HIPAA and Other Regulatory Considerations

Risks with Implementing Mobile Computing

Tactics For Success

32 AppendicesAppendix A: Wireless Landscape Diagram

Appendix B: Mobile Device Operating System Summary

Appendix C: Performance Shortcomings of Wireless LAN,Wireless Internet, and Data Synchronization Technologies

Appendix D: Representative Mobile Computing Vendorsand Products

Appendix E: Reference Web Sites

Appendix F: Glossary

41 Endnotes


5/44

Wireless and Mobile Computing | 5

Overview

MOBILE COMPUTING IS BECOMING AN IMPORTANTpart of health cares information technology (IT) toolbox.Technology advances and the proliferating health care applica-tions indicate that mobile computing will find a secure placein both inpatient and outpatient care. It is not too early fororganizations to investigate the benefits it can offer and how it would fit in with current information systems, workflow, andcare practices.

Mobile computing is not a single technology, but a combin-ation of three components (handheld computing device,connecting technology, and a centralized information system),each with different performance considerations, costs, andrisks. Successful implementation of mobile computing requiresemploying all of these components in the way that best suitsthe work and environment of the end users.

The major benefit of mobile computingconnecting care-givers to clinical data and applications anywhere and any-timeis increasingly attractive in a health care environment where physicians work longer hours and see more patients.They are looking for a more efficient means to enter andretrieve data; they cannot afford the time required to locate

an available desktop, log in, and then enter information intoa system. On the nursing side, with a severe shortage ofpersonnel, technology at the point of care can increase nursesefficiency. Furthermore, new regulatory pressures for com-prehensive clinical documentation point to the value of data recording and retrieval that is portable, accurate, easy touse, and reasonably priced.

Newer mobile computing applications not only provideclinicians with access to medical reference tools but alsohandle patient care and administrative tasks such as basiccharge capture, prescription writing, clinical documentation,

alert messaging, and general communications. Additionally,vendors of hospital information systems (HIS) are using wireless technology and teaming up with mobile computing vendors to provide portable solutions for their systems.


6/44

6 | C ALIFORNIA HEALTHC ARE FOUNDATION

Pilot the application. Mobile computing lendsitself to pilot projects because there are low front-end expenditures for the devices andapplications, and many can be piloted withsimple interfacing requirements. Start smalland build on successes.

Mobile computing and wireless technologysolutions have entered the health care industry and are beginning to prove their worth toproviders and hospitals, as well as patients.Understanding the technology and how it isused in health care are the subjects of a series of timely reports written by First Consulting Group

and published by the California HealthCareFoundation. In addition to this primer, theupcoming series includes:

E-encountersE-disease ManagementE-prescribingDiffusion

These reports, as well as other reports in theiHealth Report series, can be obtained by calling the publications line at 1-888-430-2423 or visit-ing our Web site at www.chcf.org.

Further advancement of the technology is neededto address connectivity, performance, security,integration, and cost issues for more integratedapplications. However, the rapid rate of develop-ment and maturity for wireless technology, com-bined with the appearance and promise of morepowerful handheld devices, is expected to spurapplication development to create solutions thatsupport the work of health care professionals inboth inpatient and outpatient settings.

There are risks of implementing emerging tech-nologies: Vendors and products are immature, with a limited record of success; mobile comput-ing functionality does not currently compare with traditional systems; and integrating mobilecomputing applications with current systems isrisky and expensive. Like any technology, mobilecomputing implementation requires careful plan-ning, user involvement, executive sponsorship,and commitment from the organization.

Pioneering organizations are providing valuablelessons on how to successfully introduce mobilecomputing into the work setting to improvecare delivery and workflow efficiency. Common

themes from these organizations include:Start with the business problem. What canmobile computing do that traditional applica-tions cannot?

Set realistic expectations by understanding technology capabilities and limitations, costs,and risks. Because the applications are imma-ture and many vendors are new to the market,factor additional time and resources into thedecision-making and implementation phases.

Learn from the experiences of others; review case studies and take lessons from their suc-cesses and failures. Be aware that the technolo-gy changes may be easier to integrate than the work process and role changes.


7/44


Purpose

THIS REPORT IS INTENDED TO SERVE AS A GUIDEfor health care clinicians and administrators who want tounderstand mobile computing and wireless technologyconcepts in health care. Geared toward non-technical readers,it provides a snapshot of the current marketplace with a view toward future developments. More technical information oncapabilities, issues, connectivity, and coming developmentsare included in the appendices and referenced in the text forthose interested in more detail. A vendor list and a basicglossary are also included. The following is an outline of themajor areas of this report.

I. What Is Mobile Computing?

This chapter begins with a description of the basic componentsof mobile computing and how they work together to providethe portability that caregivers need. Following the descriptionis a high level overview of the three ways data is transferredfrom the handheld to the patient care information systemdata synchronization, wireless LANs, and the Internet.Information on the mobile devices, technology issues, best-fitscenarios, and future trends is included to give a full under-standing of the components of mobile computing.

2. Applications: What Mobile Computing Does

Building on the understanding of the technology, this nextchapter provides an overview of the major application productsfor both inpatient and outpatient settings. Characteristics of the current marketplace, including acceptance, barriers, trends,and future directions are addressed.

3. Implementation Considerations:Benefits, Issues, Risks, and Tactics

The third section provides some insights into how to addressdecisions on selecting and implementing mobile computing inhealth care. Understanding the problem, expected benefits,technology considerations, HIPAA compliance, and the impacton internal processes are factors that organizations weigh when considering mobile computing. Finally, lessons learnedfrom early mobile computing implementations will helptodays adopters set realistic expectations and glean value fromthis new technology.


8/44


R ECENTLY THE TRADE AND POPULAR PRESS HASbeen full of cover stories touting mobile computing and wire-less technology as the linkage solution for personal communi-cation and business transactions. Given all of the excitementabout mobile computing and the frequent association with theInternet, it is not surprising that there are a number of mis-conceptions about what wireless is and does. Recent items inthe press indicating widespread adoption of wireless include:

The number of wireless Internet users will reach 83 millionby the end of 2005, or 39 percent of total Internet users.1

By the end of 2004 there will be 95 million browser-enabledcellular phones and more than 13 million Web-enabled per-sonal digital assistants (PDAs).2

The wireless LAN market is expected to reach $1 billion in2001; this figure will double by 2004.3

In fact, these items refer to different technologies. The firstrefers to the wireless Internet; the second is about Internet-ready devices, and the last refers to wireless LAN. All of thesetechnologies will be discussed in this report.

Probably the most common misconception is thatwireless

means the Internet. Actually, wireless refers to the underlying technology that supports the transport of data between themobile handheld computing device and the main computersystem without a wired connection between them. TheInternet is a global network that provides access to informationand applications using a browser or Web navigating applica-tion. Most mobile computing applications today in health caredo not interact at all with the Internet.

To unravel these misconceptions and understand what mobilecomputing can offer, it is important to recognize that mobilecomputing is not one technology. It is a range of solutionsthat enable user mobility by providing access to data anytime,from any location. For health care managers and caregivers, a high level understanding of wireless technology and mobilecomputing options is fundamental to sound decision-making on whether and in what ways to use them.

Most mobile computingapplications today in health care do not interact at allwith the Internet.

I. What Is Mobile Computing?


9/44

As shown in Figure 1, mobile computing hasthree components:

1. Handheld, mobile computing device2. Connecting technology that allows infor-

mation to pass back and forth between thesites centralized information system andthe handheld device and back

3. Centralized information system

Here is how mobile computing works:The user enters or accesses data (such as vitalsigns, charge information, clinical notes, ormedication orders) using the application onthe handheld computing device.Using one of several connecting technologies,the new data are transmitted from the hand-held to the sites information system wheresystem files are updated and the new data areaccessible to other system users, such as thebilling department.Now both systems (the handheld and thesites computer) have the same informationand are in sync.

The process works the same way starting fromthe other direction. For example, a physician may want to have access to all new laboratory resultsfor todays clinic patients. This information isstored in the sites information system and now needs to be transmitted to the handheld device. Again, the connecting technology delivers thedata to the handheld and the physician can roamaround, accessing the appropriate informationfrom the handheld device.

The process is similar to the way a workers desk-top PC accesses the organizations applications,except that the users device is not physicallyconnected to the organizations systems.The communication between the users deviceand the sites information systems uses differentmethods for transferring and synchronizingdata, some involving the use of radio frequency

(RF) technology.


Figure 1. Mobile Computing Components

Handheld ComputingDevice Component

In f o rmation Sys temComponent

Data CommunicationTechnolog y Component

W irele ss Connection

W iredConnection


10/44

Three Data Transfer Options

In todays market, the three most commonlyused wireless data transfer methods are:1. Wireless local area network (Wireless LAN)2. Wireless Internet or wireless Web3. Data syncing or hot syncing. This is not

a wireless data transfer method, although it isoften referenced as wireless. Data syncing uses docking cradles or docking stationsthat are connected to a LAN to transfer data from the device to the organizationsinformation system.

(For a complete picture of the mobile computing landscape, refer to the diagram in Appendix A.)

Wireless LAN Wireless LAN is a flexible data and communica-tions system used in addition to, or insteadof, a wired LAN. Using radio frequency (RF)technology, wireless LANs transmit and receive

data over the air, minimizing the need for wiredconnections and enabling user mobility. Unlikesome technologies such as infrared, wireless LANis not a line-of-sight technology. Therefore thehandheld device can operate anywhere withinthe coverage area.

In a wireless LAN, as shown in Figure 2, thecaregiver enters data into a handheld device suchas a personal digital assistant (PDA), laptop, ortablet (see Table 1 and Figure 5 for descriptions)that has a special wireless LAN card. This cardhas an antenna that transmits the data in realtime using radio frequency technology to anaccess terminal, usually connected to a ceiling or wall. The access terminal is connected to thelocal area network and sends the data receivedor requests for datafrom the handheld to thepatient care information system. Conversely, data from the sites information system can be sentto the handheld using the same technology.


Figure 2. Wireless LAN Diagram

Clinician Uses PDA, Laptopor Tablet to Access/Record/SendPatient Information

Information S y stem

Local Area N et w or k Sends/Recei v es Data

AccessTerminal

Information is sent real timeto th e access terminal . Th e access terminal sends t h e datato th e H IS v ia th e LAN .

W ireless

W ired LA N

W iredLAN


11/44

Currently wireless LANs work best in health caresettings where (1) the area of mobility is confinedto a campus or building; and (2) the need forup-to-date patient information is immediate.If the caregiver is using a small handheld devicelike a PDA, the small screen size is suited to only limited data viewing and data collection func-tions such as lab order entry, single resultsdisplay, and clinical notes entry. Laptops andtablets provide more processing capabilities, moredata storage, and larger displays so users canaccess entire patient records and view results ina number of graphical formats. Ambulatory andinpatient medical record applications work very well in a wireless LAN environment with largeruser devices. (See Table 1 and Figure 5 for morespecifics about devices.)

Case in Point: The Childrens HealthFund Mobile Clinics

Medical staff working from The ChildrensHealth Fund mobile health van now haveaccess to the organizations electronic medicalrecord (EMR) system while traveling to home-less shelters and inner-city areas. The organiza-tion, which is affiliated with MontefioreMedical Center in the Bronx, did carefulresearch before introducing (in January 2000)wireless LAN technology using handheld pentablets for recording and displaying patientinformation. The tablets are equipped withwireless LAN card antennae to communicatewith computers mounted in the van.

Unlike the old paper-based process, the tabletsprovide immediate access to patient informa-tion including medical concerns during previ-ous visits and all the details from past interac-

tions, regardless of the location. If a childshows up in one shelter at one time and thenin another years later, the caregivers have all ofthe patients information. And they can printout any information during the visit so patientscan leave with printed prescriptions andinstructions. 4

Wireless Internet Wireless Internet, also known as the wireless Web, provides mobile computing access to data using the Internet and specially equipped hand-held devices as depicted in Figure 3.

Using a Web phone or the latest PDA phone(see Figure 5) with a micro Web browser, theuser can display data accessible from the Internet.Technically speaking, the mobile device con-nected to the cellular system sends the request toa computer link server. This server acts as agateway that translates signals from the handhelddevice into language the Web can understand,

using an access and communication protocol.One of the leading protocols is called WAP(Wireless Application Protocol). The server alsoforwards the request over the Internet to a Website, such as Yahoo or AOL or the organizationssite information system.

The Web site responds to the request andforwards the information back through the link server. Again the response is translated intoa Wireless Markup Language (WML) so itis viewable on the small cell phone screen. This

translated response is then sent to the cellularsystem and finally to the Web-enabled mobilecomputing device.

Examples of the current uses of wireless Internetinclude accessing short emails, quick look-upcapabilities (stocks, weather, flights, directions,movies, restaurants), retail transactions, and alertmessaging in health care.

Wireless Internet has not been widely used inhealth care at this point. Some pioneering sites

are beginning to pilot solutions aimed only atreading emails, alert messaging, and viewing very limited patient data such as an admission notice.These users have found that wireless Internet works best in health care settings where (1) theaccess area for mobile users is wide, usually out-side of traditional care delivery settings; and (2)the need for current information is immediate.



12/44

Case in Point: Partners Healthcare SystemPilots PDAs on the Internet

One of the first pilots of the wireless Internetin health care enables Partners (Boston,Massachusetts) physicians to access patientinformation via the Internet using a Palm Pilotor other PDA device. The physician opens asecure Partners URL, authenticates his or heridentity, and then can navigate through a fewsimple screens to view clinical results fromthe HIS; get information from other physiciansthrough the online paging system; send orreceive email; or perform other functions onthe health system network. Because Partnersphysicians are constantly moving betweenfacilities, wireless has become more of a

necessity than a luxury. Decisions about wideradoption will be based on the pilot experiences. 5

Data synchronizationData synchronization (data syncing) providesmany of the benefits of mobile computing without the cost of installing wireless LANequipment or needing access to the Internet.Information is periodically downloaded from thehospital information system (HIS) to thehandheld device and then uploaded from thedevice to the HIS. The major drawback of data synchronization is that it does not providereal-time access to data.

Data syncing is not awireless data transfermethod because data are transferred from themobile computing device to the sites infor-

mation system through a docking (or syncing)cradle wired to the LAN. It is commonly grouped under the general term of wireless,because the users device is physically attached tothe LAN only during the batch data transfers.


Figure 3. Wireless Internet Diagram

Caregiver CheckingMessages Using a Web Phone

Ce llul ar Sy s te m

Link S erver / G a te w a y S erver

Information System W e b Ser v er


13/44

As an example to illustrate the process, considera caregiver who uses a handheld device to recordbrief clinic notes.

The caregiver downloads the patient infor-mation for todays outpatient visits intothe device by placing it in a docking cradleconnected to the sites local area network (LAN), then pressing a sync button.

For each patient visit, the caregiver selectsthe correct patient name and enters the clinicnotes into the handheld device.

At the end of the day, the caregiver uploadsthe notes into the HIS by again placing thedevice in the docking cradle and pressing thesync button.

Figure 4. Data Synchronization Diagram

This process and the supporting technologycomponents are illustrated in Figure 4.

Data synchronization solutions have been used widely in health care and are typically the firstuse of wireless because of the low cost to imple-ment and the wide range of applications thatdeliver real value to the organization. Theseinclude point-of-care charge entry, notes entry,ordering, prescribing, and formulary reference.Generally, data syncing solutions work best inhealth care settings where (1) mobile users haveaccess to the LAN for periodic data updates; and(2) the work being performed does not requireaccess to the most current information.


User placeshandheld devicein cradle

User d ow nl o ads / receives in fo rm a t io nto/f rom t he In fo rm a t io n Sy s te mvia a PDA cradle c o nnec ted to the LAN

Clinician Uses PDA , Lap to po r Ta b le t to A ccess / Rec o rd / S endP a t ien t In fo rm a t io n

In fo rm a t io n Sy s te m

L o cal A rea N e two rk S ends / Receives D a ta

W ired LAN

W iredLAN


14/44

Case in Point: Banner Health SystemCharge Capture

In June 2000, Banner Health System in Phoenix,Arizona replaced its paper-based chargingsystem in Respiratory Therapy with PDAdevices that collect charge and service codinginformation at the point of care.

By using data syncing between the inpatientadmission system and the handheld chargecapture application, the latest inpatient infor-mation is loaded into the PDA device. Duringeach patient visit, the therapist identifiesthe patient from the list on the PDA displayand then selects the appropriate charge andvisit code information. Periodically during theday, or at the end of the shift, the chargeinformation is uploaded to the billing system,again using data synchronization.

Besides eliminating data keying errors andlost charges, the charge capture system hassignificantly improved workflow and reducedthe time to get charge information to thebilling system. 6


Some of the mobile computing devices havealready been mentioned in order to describe thedifferent wireless data transfer options. Following is a closer look at the range of products, func-tions, and uses in health care. Although there aremany products on the market, handheld devicesfall into several categories, each with specificcapabilities and options. Because the handhelddevice is the link between the caregiver andthe data, it is important to understand its func-

tionality, limitations, and expected enhancementsto set current expectations and plan for futuregrowth.

Table 1 and Figure 5 provide high-level summary data on each device type. Current differentiating characteristics are in bold.

Several distinctions about devices and their usesin health care can be drawn:

Web phones and smart phones provide gener-al-use functions but have not yet played a rolein health care mobile computing applications.

PDAs and handheld PCs are the devices of choice for single-function applications, as wellas browser-based applications when portability is critical. These applications run on eitherthe Palm or Microsofts Windows CE (now Pocket PC OS) operating system. While PalmOS is far more widely used for todays applica-tions, it is designed for basic text storage andretrieval. Microsofts operating system hasmore powerful processing capabilities and iseasier to integrate with Microsofts desktopapplications. For more information on the twooperating systems and when an organizationneeds to make a selection decision, please referto Appendix B.

Tablets and laptops are capable of handling multiple integrated data functions with morecomplicated processing capabilities.

Future application development using thelatest PDA phones could provide solutions thatblend the best features of Web phones andPDA health care application functionality,but currently no commercial solutionsare available.



15/44

Figure 5. Mobile Computing Devices


Table 1. Comparison of Mobile Computing Devices

Device Type

Web Phone:

Cellular phone with Internet access

PDA Phone:Combination of a Web phone

with PDA functionality

Personal Digital Assistant(PDA) or Pocket PC:Handheld computerized infor-mation organizer; examples includePalm Pilot, Handspring Visor,Compaq iPaq

Handheld PC:Small hand size personal computer

with a keyboard

Tablet/Laptop:Tablet is a flat paneled PC; laptopis also known as PC notebook

Product Features

Internet browser functions

Limited email, calendar,appointment scheduling,and directories

Internet browser functions Email, calendar, appointment

scheduling, and directories

Email, calendar, appointmentscheduling, and directories

Some desktop applicationfunctions; e.g., Wordand Excel

Pen-based system fordata entry

Bar coding

More powerful than a PDA device

Some desktop applicationfunctions; e.g., Wordand Excel

Keyboard for data entry Voice recognition and

recording options Bar coding

All desktop functionality Tablets use pen or touch-

screen technology

Health Care Application Support Examples

No health care specific applications

but email and alert messaging

Single functions; e.g., charge entry,prescription writing plus Internetaccess

Single functions; one or morebasic functions; e.g., charge capture,prescription writing, lab results.

Multiple functions using browsertechnology with wireless LAN.

Single functions; one or more basicfunctions; e.g., charge capture,prescription writing, lab results.

Multiple functions using browser tech-nology with wireless LAN.

Multiple integrated functions; e.g.,full Electronic Medical Record (EMR)capabilities.

Laptop Tablet Handheld PC PDA PDA Phone Two wayPager

Web Phone

Meets MostRequirements

Meets FewRequirements

Processor PowerScreen Resolution

Ability to Support Business Application


16/44

Current Technology Issuesand Limitations

Although wireless technology is maturingrapidly, several limitations stand in the way of widespread adoption. Good decisions abouttechnology need to be based on a realistic under-standing of current performance and howlimitations can be addressed.

Technology SelectionConsiderations

Three important technical aspects to consider whenselecting a mobile computing application are:1. Infrastructure requirements2. Mobile computing device capabilities3. Integration with existing systems

Infrastructure requirementsData access and the area of mobility are the twoinfrastructure factors to consider. Real-timeaccess to updated data can only be supported by wireless data transfer technologies;near real-timeaccess can be accomplished through wireddata synchronization using the LAN. The otherimportant factor is the mobility range of theend user while using the application; depending on the technology used, the range can encompassone department, a single building, a campus,or the world.

Key questions to consider are:

1. What is the expectation for access to data?Real time? Near real time? Batch?

2. Is there an existing LAN or wireless LAN?3. What connectivity protocols are used?4. How good is the network coverage?5. How fast is the transmission speed?6. What support staff skills are needed?


Table 2. Current Technology Issues and Limitations

Technology


Wireless LANs

Wireless Internet

Data Synchronization

Current Issues and Limitations

Handheld devices such as PDAs and Pocket PCs have small screens,short battery life, limited processing power, and rudimentary dataintegration capabilities.Laptops and tablets provide greater processing, battery life, and dataviewing power, but are considerably larger and heavier, with limited data interfacing capabilities.

Data transfer speed (throughput) is currently slower than traditional LANs.Real time interfaces between mobile computing and LAN-basedapplications are custom developed for each site and therefore expensiveto create and maintain.Use of wireless LANs with some medical equipment may cause electro-magnetic interference. (See page 27.)

Wireless Internet technology faces similar issues with data transfer speedand medical equipment interference.

Additional problem of multiple connectivity standards.

Same device limitations as described above plus the need for application-specific cradles wired throughout the service area.Supports only batch data updates.


17/44

Mobile computing device capabilities With mobile computing devices, the selectiondecisions are limited. In many cases, the vendor will have already made the device decision, withonly a small range of customer-specific options.However, it is important for new users to under-stand what they are getting in terms of currentand add-on capabilities. Two considerations are:

Expandability. Most users do not want tocarry several devices; i.e., one for charge entry,one for ordering, and one for notes. Can thehandheld device support todays applicationneeds as well as plans for the future?

Special features. Having a color display orvoice recognition capabilities may be very important for some caregivers but not others,depending on what they must use the deviceto accomplish. What are the special functionsneeded for the handheld to support the appli-cation and enhance ease of use? Is it availablenow? What are expected changes for next year?

Key questions to consider are:1. What device(s) and operating system(s) does

the application use?2. What is the screen resolution of the device?3. What are the general specifications for battery

life, weight, processing power, and potentialadd-ons?

4. What is the capability of the handheld applica-tion itself? What is the future direction fordevelopment?

Integration with existing systemsThe integration of a new application with theexisting systems is always a challenge. Besidesidentifying the data, it is necessary to considerdata formatting, coded data value, updatecapabilities, ownership, and access rights for allusers in the process. Careful examination of the workflow, end-user data needs, and functionality of the systems will require technical resources(both vendor and IS) and process experts (bothvendor and end user) to create a workable,effective solution.

Key questions to consider are:

1. Will the application integrate with legacysystems?

2. What data needs to be received, updated,and sent?

3. How does the system distribute and synchro-nize files?

4. How is data ownership established?5. What methods are used to maintain data

security?See Appendix C for more information onthe prevailing issues and technical considerations with each data transfer technology.



18/44

Future Directionsfor Wireless Technology

Over time the distinction between the wirelessInternet and wireless LAN will blur as currentlimitations are overcome. Bringing access toboth data and voice communication through thesame technologythe industry calls this conver-genceis the direction of the future. However,data synchronization solutions will remain inpractice as a logical entry point for mobile com-puting and as a low-cost solution when immedi-ate access to updated data is not required.

Devices are becoming much more robust and

multi-functional. For example, voice has come tohandhelds, including speech recognition applica-tions. Other emerging device capabilities thatmay be useful include:

Video conferencing Imaging Voice browsersDigital camera attachmentLanguage translatorsLocation based services; i.e., the abilityto track location of user

Expect to see continued growth in wirelesstechnology, device capabilities, and applicationdevelopment that takes advantage of both wire-less Internet and wireless LAN.In health care there will also be growth in thenumber of products and in their usage. Althoughserious mobile computing development withsmart phones or PDA phones using the wirelessInternet is unlikely in the near future, somein-house-developed niche functionality pilots willbe testing the limits of the latest technology advances coupled with Internet access. On thecommercial vendor side, the number and com-plexity of applications supported by handheldPCs, tablets, and PDAs using wireless LAN anddata synchronization technologies will continueto increase. There will be significant growthin browser-based computing applications using wireless LAN technology because this solutionmeets the data access, response time, and data security requirements for health care providers.



19/44


Seven Applications of Mobile ComputingMobile computing applications for health care began withreference tools that allowed clinicians easy access to guidelines,medical literature, and drug information databases. Thencame transaction-based systems, which automate specific clin-ical and business tasks. The next evolutionary stepcurrently underwayis to provide multiple integrated applicationson a single device.

The other avenue of development is use of mobile computing as an extension of a hospital information system (HIS) orpractice management system, with the mobile device providing both HIS access and specific functionality. For purposes ofthis report, the application descriptions are focused on mobilecomputing functionality, but examples and case studies high-light uses as both single-function applications and extensionsof HIS solutions.

Given the immature application market and continuallyadvancing technology components, todays most effectiveapplications are those focused on tasks that require data accessat the point of care but do not require sophisticated infrastruc-tures to transfer data between the device and the organizations

computer system. These include prescription writing, chargecapture and coding, clinical documentation, and lab orderentry and results viewing. (See Appendix D for representativevendors in each application category.) The versions currently on the market are discussed below.

Prescription writing Using a PDA or pocket PC instead of a prescription pad,physicians generate prescriptions by clicking on the patient,medication, and dose. Many e-prescribing tools can alsocheck prescriptions for drug interactions and potential allergicreactions and transmit completed prescriptions directly tothe pharmacy. Products on the market today differ in almostevery step of the process, from how patient data are obtained,to where processing occurs, to how scripts are sent to thepharmacy, making this a crowded and confusing vendor field. Advancements for e-prescribing tools are likely to developrapidly as problems of integration with patient data and data transmission are overcome.

The time we save is...more in reducing pharmacy call- backs about illegible writing or a formulary problem.One call-back used to tie up three or four people for 10to 15 minutes.

physician who participated in

Medical Economics evaluation ofe-prescribing systems.17

II. Applications: What MobileComputing Does

Some reported numberson prescription writing:

22.2 percent of handhelddevices being used today areused for prescriptions. 7

4 percent to 7 percent ofonline physicians are electron-ically prescribing medications;25 percent are interested ine-prescribing in the future. 8


20/44

Charge capture and coding These popular tools for both inpatient and out-patient care enable caregivers to record informa-tion at the point of care instead of after the fact.The handheld computing application replacesthe antiquated index card system for recording charges. It includes coding tools for translating increasingly complex payer rules, especially in theambulatory setting. These applications can have a positive financial impact by capturing more accu-rate and complete information about diagnoses,procedures, and other care-related services. In thefuture, charge and coding functions will likelybe integrated with other clinical computing tools,thus capturing financial information as part of the automated care documentation process.

Lab order entry and results reporting Most often found in the inpatient setting, theseapplications allow users to order lab tests andview results at the point of care. Most focus firston one aspect of the process and then move tothe other. For example, one vendor decided tostart with result-viewing because of the limited

handheld processing and customization required,and then moved toward a total ordering andresult viewing application. Lab order entry streamlines the ordering process; results reporting allows access to often-critical patient informationanytime and anywhere. Because these functionsrequire real-time interface with existing ordering and results systems, success has been limitedto a few vendors who have either partnered with well-known traditional vendors or added inte-grating tools to their products. As the technology

advances, allowing for better integration of appli-cations, lab order entry, and results reporting tools will likely become common.

Clinical documentationLitigation, accreditation, payment requirements,and regulatory compliance are increasing theneed for clinical documentation systems. Tools with a wide range of functionality from basicnotes templates on PDAs to images that can bedisplayed on a laptop help clinicians quickly doc-ument clinical activities, as well as organize andtrack patient information from one encounterto the next. Most products supporting inpatientcare are focused on nursing documentation;applications for physicians in the ambulatory set-ting are currently supported by only a fewvendors. As more physicians and other providersbegin to participate in disease management, which requires increased data collection andmonitoring, tools that enable providers to cope with the volume of data at the point of care will become increasingly valuable and willbe accessible through mobile computing.

Alert messaging and communication

Gaining ground in inpatient care are toolsthat go beyond the pagers long used by on-call

physicians, often allowing them to receive testresults and send messages. The biggest challengefor these products is the ability to deliversecure, non-interrupted messages. As electronicinteractions between ambulatory physiciansand patients become more common, devices may be able to deliver messages and alerts to physi-cians in that setting as well.



21/44

Case in Point

At one site, multi-line alphanumeric pagers

were used with a rules engine to automaticallygenerate messages concerning exceptionalclinical events, such as critical lab value alertsor medication interaction alerts. The clinicianreceiving the alert was often the first person tobecome aware of the patients condition,although the message was also posted to thepatients electronic chart. 9

Clinical decision support These capabilities assist the clinician in determin-ing the correct intervention for a given patientbased on a combination of patient-specific infor-mation and knowledge bases. Common offeringsare stand-alone reference tools, such as medicalcomputations or drug databases, which havegained popularity on mobile devices. The realpower is when access to clinical knowledge isintegrated with other functions and patient data and can generate alerts and reminders as clini-cians perform routine tasks such as orderingand note writing. Decision support on mobilecomputing applications is expected to increase,although it will not be as common as on appli-cations that can better integrate with multipledata sources and process multiple functions.

Medication administrationMobile computing to support patient medicationprocesses can be found in both the outpatientand inpatient settings. In the inpatient setting, wireless LAN-based applications provide real

time medication alerts, as well as documenting medication administration information. Someapplications have incorporated bar coding tech-nology for positive patient and medicationidentification prior to medication administration.

Inpatient Care Solutions Although generally applications can be usedin both the inpatient and outpatient settings,most are designed initially for one environmentand then modified as needed to be useful inthe other.In hospitals, mobile computing is used in oneof two ways:

Multi-function wireless LAN solutions areimplemented throughout the campus, usually with pocket PC, tablet, or laptop devices.Single functions are automated via handhelddevices used by caregivers and administrativestaff.

In the first case, these solutions support complex processing, a high level of integration, and real-time access to data from multiple sources. They are mobile extensions of the traditional HIS.Some of the most popular inpatient applicationsare bedside charting, emergency room documen-tation, and remote access to data for physicians.10

Case in Point: Medical Center

Pilots Wireless LAN SystemClinician access to inpatient data was oneof the motivations behind the deployment ofa wireless LAN system at one large medicalcenter. The end-user device has a full-sizescreen and keyboard, as well as pen-baseddata entry. Besides improving patient care andprovider productivity, the organization hopesto gain competitive advantage in the region.After a successful pilot in the cardiac unit, theyinvested $2 million for the devices, PC NICcards for their laptops, and 250 access pointsto the wireless LAN. 11



22/44

Case in Point:Residents Track Activities

OB-Gyn residents at the University of Wash-ington use handhelds to track their activities.The program has eliminated the cumbersomepaper tracking system and maintains accuratestatistics on the residents. 12 According tothe American Academy of Family Physicians,one in four programs gives handheld devicesto its family practice residents. 13

Barriers and outlookfor inpatient solutionsThis kind of extensive wireless technology canbe complex and expensive to implement.Transmitters connected to the HIS must beplaced all around the building to send andreceive signals from the mobile clinicians.Some applications require further investmentsbeyond the wireless technology. For example,medication administration systems that usebar-coding technology require the caregiver touse a portable scanner to read a bar code onthe medication and patient ID bracelet. Thesystem checks to ensure that the correct patientis receiving the proper medication, dose, time,and route. In order for the system to work, hos-pitals must not only be able to generate bar codesfor patient bracelets and unit doses of medica-tions, it must also have a system to track themand integrate order information and patient data.

For many hospitals costs are too high to jumpright into a high-end wireless solution. Many optfor mobile computing applications that supportsingle functionality (such as charge entry orreference data access that have little integration with the HIS), which usually only require a PDA and periodic synchronization. An importantdrawback is the proliferation of devices supporting unique functions and the lack of data-sharing;

providers do not want to carry a different devicefor each of the applications they need to use.Therefore these applications are best viewed asintroductory or pilot solutions that build accept-ance and provide value if implemented as part of a plan to migrate toward a more integratedapproach.

Mobile solutions for inpatient clinical computing are likely to be offered by traditional HIS ven-dors who will partner with wireless technology providers and mobile computing vendors. Wire-less LANs will become common as the cost of deploying them decreases and integration acrossapplications improves. Adoption will be drivenby increased documentation requirements,concern over patient safety, and the proliferationof wireless LAN technology in general. Organ-izations such as the Medical Center at Ohio StateUniversity will become the norm. The big winners in this field will be the applications thatallow mobile clinicians to enter, view, and takeaction on cross-continuum patient data.

Case in Point:

Ohio State University Medical CenterOSU has a wireless LAN spanning six build-ings, which it uses for various clinical andadministrative functions including order entry,patient registration, and outpatient prescriptionwriting. The IS department can even monitorthe system itself remotely. Access pointstotal 240, with 400 wirelessly connected lap-tops in use. 14



23/44

Outpatient Care Solutions

Physician use is the primary focus of mobilecomputing in the outpatient setting. Mobilecomputing devices are well-suited to the physi-cian practice because physicians often spendtheir whole day moving among exam rooms andoffices, and need continuous access to clinicaldata. Mobile computing also avoids the cost of hardwiring many physician offices and examrooms. Other mobile health professionals, suchas home health nurses, are poised to takeadvantage of handheld computing devices fordocumentation and charge capture.

Physician Use of Handhelds

One survey estimates that 15 percent ofphysicians use handhelds. 15

In another survey, about one quarter (26.2percent) of physicians said that they usehandheld devices.

Of the handheld devices being used by thatquarter of physicians, most are used for asingle function, with scheduling, prescriptions,and patient records being the most common. 16

In the physician office, mobile devices that usebatch synchronization of data are most common. As mobile computing catches on, physiciansparticularly those in large practicesarebeginning to invest in wireless LANs. A snapshotof the current market reveals the following:

Mobile computing applications to automatespecific point-of-care processes such asprescription writing and charge capture.

Basic functionality and little integration withother systems.Partnerships and acquisitions among mobilecomputing and traditional vendors.

New business relationships among softwarevendors, pharmaceutical firms, health plans,and other health care organizations to sponsormobile or handheld computing for physicians.Low but increasing adoption rates amongclinicians.

In addition to reference tools, handheld applica-tions are focused largely on high-stake individualprocesses such as charge capture or prescriptionmanagement. Besides mobility, potential benefitsinclude decreased paperwork, increased revenueand collections, less rework, easier communica-tions, and access to administrative (for example,

formularies and schedules) and medical informa-tion. (See also Table 3.)

Adoption of current mobile computing productofferings is difficult to gauge, given the limitedresearch and rapid growth of the market. Onemedication reference application vendor, how-ever, says more than 350,000 health care profes-sionals have downloaded its current product.To persuade more physicians to use theirproducts, many vendors are sponsoring studiesto prove the value of the applications. Oneelectronic prescribing vendor showed savingsof as much as $3.20 per prescription when com-paring paper and electronic prescriptions.18 Inanother instance, an orthopedic practice showeda 577 percent return on investment by using a charge capture application.19



24/44

Spending on IT

Physicians often cite cost as one of the

biggest barriers to bringing more IT into theirpractices: 61.4 percent of physician practicessurveyed have IT budgets of less than 4 per-cent of their operating expenses, and withinthat percentage, 15.2 percent spend lessthan 1 percent. Large group practices take thelead in IT investments. 20

Vendors are also teaming up with other playersin the health care industry to offset the initialcost of these solutions for physicians. Established

vendors are partnering with start-ups to offermobile solutions to existing clients. Morecomplicated relationships exist among mobilecomputing vendors and other sponsors such ashealth plans, pharmaceutical companies, andpharmacy benefits management concerns.(Figure 6 shows the various relationships thatare forming.) The difficulty with some of thesemodels relates to the uneasy relationship physi-cians traditionally have had with managed careorganizations and pharmaceutical companies.Many of the prescription-writing vendors arelooking for sponsorship from the pharmaceuticalindustry, which is enthusiastic about gaining access to the physician and aggregated prescribing data. However, some models require physiciansto accept advertising and messages from pharma-ceutical companies on their devices and possibly share aggregated patient data with a third party.

Theoretically, physicians would have to carry multiple devices, each with a different formulary and pricing structure, if each plan offered thema tool for their covered patients. It remains to beseen which models will be durable and sustain-able and to what extent physicians themselves will invest in these tools.


Figure 6. A Growing Networkof Business Relationships

Third Parties

Eli Lilly

Express Scripts

General Motors

Glaxo Wellcome

Johnson & Johnson

Merck-Medco

Parke-Davis

Pfizer

MobileComputingVendors

Allscripts MasterChart

Cerner Data Critical

Physix ElixisePhysician ePocrates iScribe MDeverywhere Medscape Meditech MicroMed ParkStone PatientKeeper PenChart PocketScript WirelessMD


25/44

Barriers and outlookfor outpatient solutionsCost and lack of integration with legacy systemsare major barriers to widespread adoption of advanced forms of mobile computing in ambu-latory care. Other factors include confusionover the large number of products on the market;impact on the work environment; worry aboutthe learning curve associated with new technology;concerns over data security and confidentiality;and reluctance to invest in leading-edge solutions.

Despite the barriers, the number of clinicianusers is increasing and is expected to grow. Ven-

dors will address integration issues and increasefunctionality through internal development andby building business alignments with strong part-ners from among more traditional ambulatory medical record vendors who have establishedclients. Thus wireless technology will provide themobile extension of electronic records, providing physicians with documentation and access topatient data at the point of care.

Because acceptance of clinical computing toolshas been relatively low in ambulatory care, withonly about 20 percent of physicians keeping any kind of electronic records, single-function andstand-alone mobile solutions are not expected tofade out.22 In fact, studies from e-health vendor WebMD suggest that many of the physiciansusing handheld devices to support patient caredo not have access to good practice managementsystems or electronic patient records.23

The other area that shows high potentialfor outpatient mobile computing is home health, where visiting nurses could use mobile com-puting applications to record patient charges,document clinical findings, and get access tomedical reference information.



26/44


CURRENTLY , THE MAJOR ADVANTAGE OF MOBILEcomputing over traditional systems is the mobility it affordsaccess to data and functions anywhere. Mobile computingcannot duplicate all of the functionality of traditional systems.It is not a solution that supports the entire care process; ratherit targets one or more tasks within the process. Therefore,if the workflow and the information requirements dictate theneed for this type of targeted processing portability, thenmobile computing may make sense.

These limitations of currently available technology shouldfactor into decisions about whether and how to adoptand implement wireless solutions. The first question to ask is: What can mobile computing applications do that traditionalapplicationscannot do to solve a particular business problem?

The Benefits of Mobile Computing

To answer this and the many questions that must be addressedin the decision-making process, it is important to understandhow the mobile technology solution solves a particularbusiness problem and fits into the workplace. In fact, address-ing the how determines the people, process, and technology

changes that will make the introduction of mobile comput-ing successful. And, like any other technology, mobile comput-ing requires careful planning, executive sponsorship, andend-user commitment.

Here is an example of a busy family practice clinic that isconsidering mobile computing. This clinic is having problems with timely charge capture, high volume of lost charges, andclaim denials based on inaccurate visit coding. Physiciansuse pre-printed check-off forms to indicate visit services andhandwrite in anything that is not on the sheet. The forms aredropped into a box at the front desk and then keyed into thebilling system by the administrative staff at the end of theday or whenever there is free time. In reality, the charge formsmay not get entered for days.

Physicians are not techno- phobes, but they are looking for perfect solutions.

Bernd Wollshlaegerof the University of MiamiSchool of Medicine21

III. Implementation Considerations:Benefits, Issues, Risks, and Tactics


27/44

A potential solution for this clinic would bea charge capture application on a PDA or pocketPC device. Physicians would enter informationduring their patient visits, eliminating the needfor paper and administrative support for chargeentry and checking for coding accuracy andcompleteness. The system would alert the user when charges have not been entered. Whilethe physicians workflow would not change, theclinic would stand to benefit financially.

Other benefits have been identified in recentmobile computing implementations in the areasof improved workflow, decreased manual tasks,shorter patient and clinician wait times, and betterclinical documentation. (See Table 3 for details.)

Once a business case for mobile computing hasbeen made, specific technology and risk consider-ations must be addressed and integrated into theimplementation plan.

The Problem of ElectromagneticInterference (EMI)

Now that more clinicians, other staff, and visitorsto the hospital are using wireless devices, thereis concern that the signals from these devices may interfere with those of telemetry equipment thatuses radio frequency (RF) technology to transmitinformation from the portable monitor to the

central display station.24

Interference could causemalfunction of devices and potentially harmpatients.


Table 3. Potential Benefits from Health Care Mobile Computing ApplicationsDecreased Decreased

Positive Improved Decreased Decreased Number of Improved Variation/Mobile Financial Documentation Wait Times Wait Time Improved Manual MD ImprovedComput ing Appl icat ion Impact and Coding for Pat ients for MDs Workflow Tasks/Phone Sat isfact ion CareQual ity

Alert Messaging /Communication

Charge Captureand Coding

ClinicalDocumentation

Decision Support

Lab Order Entryand Results Reporting

Medication Administration

Prescription Writer


28/44

While different radio frequency devices used inthe same areacan cause interference and mal-function; the likelihood of interference is basedon the closeness of the two frequency ranges andthe physical distance between the devices. Forexample, many wireless LAN-supported devices(such as wireless laptops supporting an electronicmedical record) operate in the 2.4 GHz frequency range as shown in Figure 7. Cellular and smartphones operate in the 800 MHz and 1800-1900MHz frequency ranges. Finally, telemetry andmonitoring devices operate anywhere in therange set aside for medical equipment, but mostoperate in the lower end. Therefore, the most

likely problem with EMI is between cellularphones and medical equipment, but thereis always a potential for interference betweenmonitors and wireless LAN access points that arein very close proximity.

Currently, the best way to address the EMI prob-lem is for an organizations biomedical engineer-ing department to conduct controlled tests withthe specific devices and RF medical equipment ina lab setting. These tests can measure the level of interference and determine the safe distancesbetween the devices. One study from the Mayo

Clinic in Rochester, New York, for example, indi-cated that EMI in this case is only a problem when cellular telephones are within 60 inches of their monitors.25

The longer-term solution to the EMI problem isto separate the frequency ranges for the differentdevices and have guidelines for electromagneticcompatibility (EMC). The FDA and FCC are working with vendors to set up such frequency use standards. Last year the FCC set asideparticular frequencies for primary or co-primary use by wireless medical telemetry systems.Once these standards are adopted as shown inFigure 7, patient care monitors, telemetryequipment, wireless LAN devices, and cellularphones will operate in different portions of theradio frequency spectrum and will be less likely to cause interference. It will take some time,however, for vendors to migrate their telemetry products to the new frequencies, so organizationsshould always test for interference in a lab setting and establish written policies to cross-check any new RF devices before they can be used in areassupportedby telemetry equipment.


Figure 7. Future Radio Frequencies to Mitigate EMI in Health Care Facilities

RF Spectrum

800 MHz, 1800-1900 MHz:W e b Phon e s, Sm a rt Phon e s

2.4 G Hz:W LAN s

608- 61 4 MHz, 139 5 -1 4 00 MHz,142 9-1 4 32 MHz:

N e w M e di ca l Te lemetr y


29/44

HIPAA and Other RegulatoryConsiderations

Organizations adopting mobile computing mustaddress the security and patient privacy require-ments of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 in a way that is consistent with the technology, policy, andprocedures for patient-identifiable informationdelivered electronically by any other device. Thebiggest HIPAA-related issue for mobile comput-ing is also its biggest advantageportability.Unlike fixed desktop workstations, small wirelessdevices are at high risk for theft and losstaking with them confidential patient data. Whilevendors are responsible for requirements relatedto code sets, encryption, privacy, and audittrails, user organizations need to manage thedevices. Appropriate property management con-trols and turning off device storage cache settingsare current measures used to manage mobiledevices. Many vendors are solving the patientdata security issue by using only browser-basedapplications on the mobile computing device. Inthis approach, the data reside only on the serverand cannot be accessed by the mobile computing device once it is outside the wireless LANcoverage area.

Key HIPAA questions to ask Privacy: What measures does the system take toensure that only appropriate users can view patient information? Are there gradations of accessprivileges for different types of users? Is the systemcapable of recording audit trails of user edits andaccess to patient information?

Security: What level of encryption can theapplication support for wireless transmission? Where does the data reside? What securitymeasures are guarding it? How is access tocomputing devices handled?

Other: Will the system be able to accommodatethe provider, employer, and health plan identi-fiers? Will the vendor commit to accommodating the patient identifier? Does the system comply with the HIPAA standards for EDI transactionsand code sets?

There may be other regulatory requirements toconsider. Because HIPAA does not preempt morestringent state laws governing medical privacy,organizations must take into account theselaws as well. For information on HIPAA admin-

istrative simplification rules, see the U.S. Depart-ment of Health and Human Services Web page(http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/Index.htm).



30/44

Risks with ImplementingMobile Computing

Because implementation risks with newer tech-nologies and first-generation applications fromnew vendors can be substantial, organizationsshould document potential problems and create a risk management plan to minimize impact.The following are some risks specific to mobilecomputing and wireless technology.

Impact on user productivity and workflow. A concern often voiced by physicians is loss of productivity. Therefore, solutions designed forease of use and adaptability to workflow are gen-

erally the most successful. To insure the impactof a particular solution on productivity is apositive one, it is important to learn as muchas possible about the flexibility of the screen flow,user-definable data fields, implementation tim-ing, and training requirements. It is likely thatmobile computing helps to improve only certaintasks within the workflow; it is not the wholesolution. Improvements in productivity and workflow will be incremental, as these tasks areautomated using mobile computing.

Technology support required. Implementing a mobile computing application, especially onesupported by a wireless LAN, will most likely require additional technical support, considerableimplementation time, and close involvement with the vendor technical support staff. Imple-menting newer technology will often uncoverproblems never seen before and on which thevendor and information services (IS) staff must work together to solve. Once implemented, sup-porting these newer technologies requires highly skilled, and currently scarce, technical resources.These factors will impact both the selectionprocess and implementation timelines.

Vendor stability . Because mobile technology isan emerging market, the viability of vendorsmust be considered. Vendors have been affectedby the limited capital funding that providershave for IT investments, and few have achievedprofitability or gained a critical mass of users(although some are testing different pricing andbusiness partnership models with health plans,pharmaceutical firms, and other softwarevendors). As the recent dot-com fallout illustrates,the promise of new technology is no substitutefor a solid market share, a large number of installed products, and, of course, profitability.The prospect of mergers and acquisitions in themobile computing market increases the necessity of ensuring long-term product support. Organ-izations will also want to consider the rapiddevelopment cycle of this technology and planthe duration of the contract accordingly.



31/44

Tactics for Success

After the selection decision for a particularmobile computing application has been made,implementing the system just as carefully will help to ensure that the end-users are satisfiedand full value is realized. The following imple-mentation tactics, based on the most recentmobile computing project experiences, shouldhelp projects move smoothly.

Understand the integration of workflow,information flow, and technology. Mobilecomputing is not the entire solution; it addressesspecific tasks within the care delivery process.

Understanding the points where technologyis provided and the information collectedor displayed for the end user will lead to a clearmap of the necessary changes in the currentprocess and roles. In many projects, implement-ing the process, roles, and responsibility changesis far more challenging than installing thenew technology.

Set user expectations. Take the time to under-stand, document, and set expectations related toeach functionality and technology that will beinstalled. Many device manufacturers and appli-cation vendors claim incredible functionality andaccess to information. Remember that mobiledoes not necessarily mean wireless, real-timeaccess to data. Make sure that end users are notled to believe that the application is going to givethem access to the same services and function-ality that they have on their PCs with wired con-nections. Mobile computing will give them basicfunctions with the added benefit of mobility.

Learn from experience. Comb the health indus-try trade press, network with contacts, andperform a literature search to get valuable insightinto how the technology works on the ground.Useful starting points include product, vendor,and organization Web sites. These often providedetailed information on the application or tech-nology and typically include case studies andlinks to related sources. (Refer to Appendix Dand E for more information.)

Pilot the application. A great implementationadvantage with mobile computing is that piloting is possible. The cost for the handheld devices,software, and basic data synchronization interfac-ing is very low, especially if the vendor is willing to partner with the organization to gain experi-ence with implementations and have referencesites. By starting small, users get a clear under-standing of how mobile computing impacts their work environment. Pilot implementations iden-tify process and technology adjustments that willimprove user acceptance and the overall successof the project when it is rolled out.



32/44


AppendicesAppendix A: Wireless Landscape Diagram


Appendix C: Performance Shortcomings of Wireless LAN, WirelessInternet, and Data Synchronization Technologies

Appendix D: Representative Mobile Computing Vendorsand Products

Appendix E: Reference Web Sites



33/44

W i r e l e s s a n d M o b i l e C o m p u t i n g |

3 3

Voice Systems

W e b Serv e r

M o b ileA ppl ic a tio n

Se rv e r s

D a ta G a te w a y

W ir e lessLA N P oi n to f A ccess

Sy n c

In te r n et

G a te w a y

A ppl ica tio n Se rv e r s

Le g a cy D a ta Systems

ApplicationSystems Integration M ob ile Integration W ireless N et w or k

F I R

E W A L L

Source: ArcStream, Inc.


34/44

One of the most publicized debates in the worldof handheld computing is the ongoing discussionabout the best operating system for PDA devices. Is it the first and widely accepted Palmoperating system developed by Palm or the newerentrant Windows CE, now called Pocket PC OS,created by Microsoft? Although there are others,these two garner the majority of market forcurrent health care applications.

The Palm system operates a small touch screenthat is manipulated with a stylus; data can beentered using menus or a simple character-recognition language. Pocket PC OS GUI moreclosely resembles the standard Microsoft PCdesktop and is manipulated by a small keyboardand/or touch screen. The Palm system drivessmaller devices and is somewhat simpler to use;but not as function rich as Pocket PC OS.

Why is it important to know about mobile deviceoperating systems? For many organizations, itis not. However, it is important for organizationsto look at operating system capabilities for tworeasons. First, there are a growing numberof caregivers who are making individual PDA

purchases for a variety of personal and profes-sional uses. To help set standards for ongoing support, volume contracting, and future applica-tion and data integration, it is wise to investigatethe capabilities of both operating systems anddecide on a preferred standard up front.

The second reason is for internal applicationdevelopment. For those sites that anticipate thatcommercial applications will not be able to fulfilltheir requirements, they will need to determinethe best platform for development. For appli-cations that are focused on lists, text storage andretrieval, and basic computations, Palm is wellsuited to complete these functions. If integration with desktop applications, SQL support, Win-dows look and feel, and enhanced screen resolu-tion for more complicated displays is needed,then Pocket PC OS may be the best choice.

However, upgraded capabilities, new functions,and add-on enhancements are announced ona regular basis, so refer to the Palm and Microsoft Web sites as well as consumer Web sites such as www.handheldmed.com for the latest productinformation.



Table B1. Key Differentiatiors between Palm and Microsoft Operating Systems

Palm OS

Designed for text storage retrieval: calendar,address book, scheduler

Simpler to use Used in smaller, lighter PDA devices that easily

fit into lab coat pockets Lower memory requirements

Uses a touch screen with a stylus

More vendors use it for application development On the market for a longer time and viewed

as more stable Currently less expensive

Windows CE (now Pocket PC OS)

Scaled-down version of Microsoft Office applicationsincluding Word and Excel

GUI has the familiar Windows user interfacelook and feel

Screen resolution is much better for PocketPC devices

Uses touch screen or keyboard for data entry with

superior handwriting capability Better integration with Microsoft Office desktop

application suite Greater functionality; e.g., supports MP3, multi-

media, advanced graphics, and SQL


35/44


Wireless Internet

Current: 14,400 bps (bitsper second), much slower

than modem Internet con-nections (56,000 bps).Impact: Can send or receiveonly a few lines of text orfew data points.

Resolutions: 3G technology will significantly improvetransfer speeds withincreased speeds rangingfrom 144 kilobits per second(Kbps) in 2001, 384 Kbpsin 2002 and 2Mbps in2003+. Not expected in theU.S. until early 2002.

Current: Not an issue asfew data are exchangedbetween device and server,mostly messages.Impact: Not a factor withcurrent use, but mayincrease if more data aresent via this technology.Resolution: Not an issue

at this time.

Current: Multiple prev-alent connectivity standardsin place.Impact: A device designedto work with one technology cannot be used on a net-

work that employs anotherunless special programmingis included to translate thedifferent formats.Resolutions: Inter-systemconnectivity products now available but overhead de-creases transfer speeds. Giventhe wide use of the differentconnectivity standards by AT&T, Sprint, Pacific Bell,and Verizon, convergence ona single standard in the nearfuture is not likely.

Data Synchronization

Current: Not an issue.

Impact: N/A

Resolutions: N/A

Current: Point-to-pointcustomized batch interfacesbetween handheld devicesand server applications.Impact: Costly custominterfaces inhibit rapiddeployment of applications.

Resolution: Not seen as a

big issue at this time giventhe limited functionality of the handheld applications.

Current: Not an issue

Impact: N/A

Resolutions: N/A

Issue

Slow DataTransfer Speed

Lack of Data Interfacing Standards

Lack of Connectivity Standard

Wireless LAN

Current: Data transferspeed is 7 Mbps (mega bits

per second) versus 10 to 100Mbps for wired LANs.Impact: Cannot sendimages (e.g., radiology images) or large amounts of data (e.g., entire electronicpatient clinical record).Resolutions: Many tech-nology vendors are promis-ing improvements in speedthat are expected to beavailable in the 2002 timeframe. Application vendorsare building browser basedapplications to minimizedata transfer between thehandheld device and theapplication server.

Current: Point-to-pointcustomized data interfacesbetween handheld devicesand server applications.Impact: Costly, custominterfaces inhibit the rapiddeployment of applications

Resolutions: Development

of wireless LAN inter-facing middleware. Mobilecomputing vendors andtraditional vendors are devel-oping standard interfaces.

Current: : IEEE 802.11standard is the emerging leader.Impact: Not a major issuebecause many vendorsadhere to IEEE 802.11.

Resolutions: N/A

Appendix C: Performance Shortcomings of Wireless LAN, WirelessInternet, and Data Synchronization Technologies


36/44


Appendix D:Representative Mobile Computing Vendors and Products*

Vendor/Product

Allscripts Healthcare SolutionsFirst Fill

TouchWorks Professional EnterpriseMaster Chart

AUTROS HealthcareSolutions, Inc.

Becton, Dickinson and Company BD Rx System

Bridge Medical, Inc.MedPoint

Cerner CorporationMillennium

Data Critical AlarmView StatView FlexView PocketChart (by Physix)

WebChart (by Elixis)UniwiredDr

DynaMedix CorporationPocketCode

ePhysicianePhysician Practice

ePocratesePocrates Rx ePocrates IDDocAlert

iScribei3000i5000

Functionality

E-prescribing Charge capture/coding

Lab orders and results Clinical documentation Clinical decision support

Medication administration



Adapted Cerner HNAMillennium applications

Alert messaging Charge capture/coding Clinical documentation Lab orders and results E-prescribing

Charge capture/coding

E-prescribing Charge capture/coding Drug reference Clinical decision support

Drug reference Alert messaging and clinical

decision support

E-prescribing Clinical decision support

Contact Information

2401 Commerce AvenueLibertyville, IL 60048-4464

www.allscripts.com(800) 654-0889

One Yorkdale Road, Suite 310Toronto, Canada M6A 3A1

www.autros.com(800) 537-2255

1 Becton DriveFranklin Lakes, NJ 07417

www.bd.com(201) 847-6800

120 South Sierra Solana Beach, CA 92075

www.bridgemedical.com(858) 350-0100

2800 Rockcreek Parkway Kansas City, MO 64117

www.cerner.com(816) 221-1024

19820 North Creek Parkway,Suite 100Bothell, WA 98011

www.datacritical.com www.unwireddr.com(425) 482-7000

222 West Las Colinas Blvd.,North TowerIrving, TX 75039

www.dynamedix.com(800) 522-3692

1390 Shorebird Way Mountain View, CA 94043

www.ephysician.com(650) 314-2000

120 Industrial RoadSan Carlos, CA 94070

www.epocrates.com(650) 592-7900

1400 Industrial Way Redwood City, CA 94063 www.iscribe.com(877) 771-4900


37/44

Vendor/Product(s)

Mdeverywhere, Inc.EveryCharge

EveryNoteClearCoderEveryReferenceEveryOrder

Meditech

Medscape, Inc.Medscape Mobile

MicroMed Healthcare Systems

NextGen EMR

PatientKeeper Corporation(formerly Virtmed)PatientKeeper PersonalPatientKeeper Enterprise

PenChart PenChart System


Contact Information

PO Box 14669Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

www.mdeverywhere.com(919) 484-9002

MEDITECH Circle Westwood, MA 02090 www.meditech.com(781) 821-3000

20500 NW Evergreen Parkway Hillsboro, OR 97124

www.medicalogic.com(503) 531-7000

200 Welsh Road

Horsham, PA 19044 www.micromed.com(215) 657-7010

Brighton Landing East20 Guest Street, Suite 500Brighton, MA 02135

www.patientkeeper.com(617) 987-0300

2389 Main Street, Suite 101Glastonbury, CT 06033

www.penchart.com(800) 568-1528

Functionality

Charge capture/coding Clinical documentation

Reference Order entry

Clinical documentation

Drug reference

Electronic medical record

Clinical decision support

Charge capture/coding Lab orders and results Clinical documentation Patient tracking

Electronic medical record


38/44


Web Site

M O B I L E C O M P U T I N G A N D W I R E L E S S N E W S S I T E S

www.cewindows.net

www.cewire.com

www.ft.com/wap/

www.mbizcentral.com

www.mobilevillage.com

www.pencomputing.com

www.thinkmobile.com

www.wirelessweek.com

www.wlana.org

www.wow-com.com

Name

Chris De Herreras WindowsCE Web site

CE Wire news Web site

Financial Times WAP Web site

M-Business Magazine

Market development company formobile computing

Pen Computing Magazine

Internet.coms mobilecomputing portal

Web site for wireless news items

Wireless LAN Association(a nonprofit vendor consortium)

World of Wireless Communication

Description

Information and comparisons on Windows CE and Palm OS

Windows CE News andInformation source

Understanding WAP and othernumerous articles, key players,

Web links, glossary of terms

News and articles as well as links toresources and data

News and limited case studies onmobile computing, conferenceinformation, hardware and softwarestores, and consulting services

Full spectrum of wireless articles andproduct information

News, articles, links, product infor-mation, and vendor and serviceprovider information

Content Web site for wirelesstechnologies

Introduction/overview of wirelessLANs, events, suggested reading,related Web sites, user stories(including health care)

Sites sponsored by the Cellular Tele-communication Industry Association

with news, regulatory, and consumerinformation on wireless

Appendix E. Reference Web Sites


39/44


Web Site

H E A L T H C A R E S I T E S

aspe.os.dhhs.gov/admnsimp

www.fcc.gov/healthnet

www.fda.gov/cdrh/index.html

www.handheldmed.com

www.mohca.org

www.pdamd.com

C O M P A N Y S I T E S

www.arcstreamsolutions.com

www.724.com

www.microsoft.com/mobile

www.palm.com

www.wirelessknowledge.com

Name

HIPAA Web site

Health care and the FCC

Center for Devices andRadiological Health

Clinical handheld computing

Mobile Healthcare Alliance

Medical PDA Web site

ArcStream Inc.

Interconnectivity software vendor

MS Mobile Device Web site

Palm Handheld ComputingSolutions

Web site for WirelessKnowledge Inc

Description

Information on HIPAA regulationssponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services

News and links related to tele-communications in health care

Information on federal programsand alerts relating to the safety andeffectiveness of medical devices andlimiting the exposure to radiation

News, product reviews, vendor pressreleases, articles (Palm vs. WinCE),user forum, glossary, applications fordownloading

Open forum for exchanging ideas,promoting learning, and sharingsolutions for managing and securing health information

News, product reviews, tutorials(Choosing the Right PDA), exten-sive discussion board/chat room

Wireless systems integration firm

Gateway technologies for WirelessLAN interconnectivity with disparatetransmission standards

Product, news, and support informa-tion related to Windows CE

Company Web site. Product informa-tion, solutions, support, and resources

Company formed by Microsoft andQUALCOMM. Develops core tech-nology in enabling wireless accessto the enterprise environment

* Compiled March 2001


40/44

Access pointRadio-based two-port network bridge that interconnects a wired local area network to a wireless LAN.

Ambulatory medical record (AMR) Genericname for a computer system that automates thecare delivery processes and stores patient clinicaldata in support of outpatient care services (some-times called electronic medical record or EMR).

Application service provider (ASP) A vendorthat deploys, hosts, and manages access to a packaged application for multiple parties from a central facility, charging a subscription use fee.

Browser A software program that interpretsdocuments written in HTML, the primary pro-gramming language of the World Wide Web. A browser such as Netscape or Microsoft Exploreris required to experience the photos, video, andsound elements on a Web page and assists inquick, easy travel around the Web.

Data synchronization/data syncing Theprocess of sending updates between the mobilecomputing device and the application server in a batch mode to keep both sets of files in sync.

Sometimes called hot syncing.Electronic medical record (EMR) Genericterm describing a computer system that auto-mates the care delivery processes and storespatient clinical data in support of inpatient careservices.

Firewall A security device situated between a private network and outside networks. The firewall screens user names and all information thatattempts to enter or leave the private network,

allowing or denying access or exchange based onpre-set access rules. Also see encryption.

Global Positioning System (GPS) A series of satellites that continuously transmit their posi-tion. Used in personal tracking, navigation, andvehicle location technologies.Handheld device See mobile computing device.

Handheld PC Small hand-size personal com-puter that uses a keyboard.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 Federalregulatory requirements to protect the security,confidentiality, and privacy of patient data.

Hospital information system (HIS): Genericterm used to describe computer systems thatsupport the administrative and care delivery processes for a hospital.

Hypertext markup language (HTML) Theprimary programming language for sites on the World Wide Web. This skeleton of codes sur-rounds blocks of text and/or images and containsall the display commands. A browser program isneeded to interpret HTML and turn it into a graphical display on a computer screen.

Institute of Electrical and ElectronicsEngineering (IEEE) A professional association with multiple organization groups that developsand promotes standards. The IEEE 802 stan-dards are focused on the communication proto-cols for wireless LANs.

Internet A global network of computers thatoperates on a backbone system without a truecentral host computer. It links thousands of uni-versities, government institutions, and compa-nies. The World Wide Web is an integral part of the Internet; its ease of use has made it muchmore popular than its less graphical parent.

Local area network (LAN) A group of clientcomputers connected to a server.




41/44


42/44

Wireless Internet Wireless mobile computing that uses the Internet as part of the underlying network communications infrastructure.Sometimes called wireless Web.

Wireless LAN A local area network that usesradio frequency technology to transmit data though the air for relatively short distances. Itcan serve as a replacement for or extension to a wired LAN.

Wireless LAN adapter Component attachedor integrated into the handheld device thatt

wireless and mobile computing

Documents