winterwtruse scott v dec09

Upload: unofelice

Post on 30-May-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    1/32

    Winter Water Use in the

    Scott River Valley

    December 2009

    Produced by KlamBlog (www.KlamBlog.blogspot.com)

    Principle Investigator: Felice Pace

    http://www.klamblog.blogspot.com/http://www.klamblog.blogspot.com/
  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    2/32

    The Klamath River Basin

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    3/32

    The Scott River Sub-basin

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    4/32

    The Scott River basin was once a stronghold for KlamathRiver anadromous fishes including Spring and Fall Chinook,Summer and Winter Steelhead, Coho and Pacific Lamprey

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    5/32

    increased dramatically in the Scott River Basin since the 1970s asfarmers converted from dry farming to irrigation and from growing wheat

    to growing alfalfa. This graph by Robert Van Kirk shows irrigationwithdrawal over time. In 2009 rice was grown for the first time in Scott

    Valley.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    6/32

    By the end of the 1970s, Spring Chinook, Chum Salmon and SummerSteelhead were functionally extinct in the Scott River Basin. Coho are

    close to extinct. Fall Chinook survive at depressed levels; WinterSteelhead are holding their own.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    7/32

    The Shakleford-Mill Creek Watershed contains some of the bestspawning and rearing habitat for Coho Salmon remaining in the

    Scott River Basin. This photo shows some of that habitat onDecember 25th 2009.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    8/32

    On December 25th 2009 Coho Salmon could still not access primespawning grounds in Shakleford-Mill, Kidder, Etna and Patterson

    Creeks. Some claim this is the result of drought. This photo shows themouth of Shakleford-Mill Creek on Christmas Day.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    9/32

    As Shakleford-Mill Creek remained inaccessible to Coho due toinsufficient flow, many irrigation ditches in the watershed were running

    full. The following pages show several of these ditches. This slide showsa ditch on the Tozier Ranch.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    10/32

    Hayden Ranch Ditch in the Shakleford-Mill Watershed. The fieldbeyond the ditch is being flood irrigated.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    11/32

    Emigrant Creek Ditch in the Shakleford-Mill Creek Watershed

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    12/32

    Emigrant Creek in Shakleford-Mill WatershedThis was formerly Coho habitat and could be again.

    But all the waters in the ditch!

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    13/32

    The bed of Kidder Creek near Fort Jones on December 7th 2009.Kidder Creek once provided prime habitat for Coho Salmon. Nowin most years neither Chinook nor Coho Salmon can gain access.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    14/32

    By December 25th Kidder Creek was running but flow appeared toolow for Coho to gain access. Note the prevalent granite sand. Thisis the result of clearcuts and poorly maintained logging roads on

    steep, highly erodible and geologically unstable land .

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    15/32

    These are two of the three Kidder Creek Ditches that were runningfull on December 25th 2009.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    16/32

    Etna Creek Ditch on December 25th 2009.This ditch runs full year around; Etna Creek is dewatered half of the year.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    17/32

    Dewatered Patterson Creek at Eller Lane on Christmas Day 2009.Note the trampled banks and cattle tracks.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    18/32

    Cattle feces in the bed of Patterson Creek. When flows finally come toScott Valley Streams, a flush of animal waste flows down to the KlamathRiver which has impaired water quality as a result of excessive nutrients.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    19/32

    Hanson Ranch in the Scott River Valley part of the Scott ValleyIrrigation District. Is this livestock watering or flood irrigation?

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    20/32

    Moffet Creek near Ft. Jones. The land above was dry farmed untilthe 1970s. Groundwater pumping for irrigation has dewatered this

    creek which once supported a good run of Steelhead trout.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    21/32

    The Scott River Adjudication1980 Superior Court Decree

    Page 8: Water allocated by direct diversion forirrigation use shall be for the season from about

    April 1 to about October 15 of each year.

    Page 9: To provide water at various places of usefor domestic and stockwatering purposes duringthe nonirrigation season from about October 15 to

    about April 1, all claimants are entitled to divert asufficient amount of water in their priority class tooffset reasonable conveyance losses and todeliver 0.01 cfs at the place of use.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    22/32

    The Scott River Adjudication1980 Superior Court Decree

    Page 5: Nothing herein contained shall beconstrued to allot to any claimant a right towaste water, or to divert from the Scott River

    stream system at any time a quantity of waterin excess of the amount reasonablynecessary for his beneficial use under areasonable method of use and a reasonablemethod of diversion, nor to permit him to

    exercise his right in such a manner as tounreasonably impair the quality of the naturalflow.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    23/32

    CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTIONARTICLE 10

    The right to water or to the use or flow of water

    in or from any natural stream or water course in

    this State is and shall be limited to such wateras shall be reasonably required for the

    beneficial use to be served, and such right does

    not and shall not extend to the waste or

    unreasonable use or unreasonable method ofuse or unreasonable method of diversion of

    water.

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    24/32

    Coho Assessment in a portion of the

    Scott River Valley ~ December 25, 2009

    Miles of Stream inaccessible to Coho during the2009 spawning season as a result of agriculturalwater diversions (estimate):

    Shakleford-Mill Creek ... 13-15 miles Kidder Creek .. 8-10 miles Patterson Creek . 5-7 miles

    Etna Creek .. 6-8 miles

    TOTAL STREAM MILES NOT ACCESSIBLE

    TO COHOSALMON SPAWNERS AS A RESULT OFAGRICULTURAL DIVERSIONS:

    33 to 41 miles

    Number of diversion ditches running full on

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    25/32

    Number of diversion ditches running full on

    in a portion of the Scott River Valley

    December 25, 2009

    Shakleford-Mill Creek Watershed 3

    Kidder Creek Watershed .. 3

    Etna Creek Watersheds 1

    TOTAL full-on diversions observed . 7

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    26/32

    Water Trust or Public Trust?

    The Scott River Water Trust is leasing waterfrom irrigators in an attempt to provide thewater Coho and Chinook Salmon need to

    survive in the Scott River Basin. But theCalifornia Constitution, court decisions andthe Public Trust Doctrine tell us that irrigatorsmust allow enough water to pass their dams

    and diversions to keep fish habitat below ingood condition. Does leasing water to whichthe fish already have a right make sense? Isthis practice sustainable?

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    27/32

    The Public Trust Doctrine

    By natural law itself these things are

    the common property of all: air,

    running water, the sea, and with it theshores of the sea.

    - Institutes of Justinian, Book II, c.1, s.1 (circa 530 AD)

    For more on the Public Trust Doctrine seehttp://www.ourstreamsflow.org/documents/public_trust_doctrine.pdf

    andhttp://www.bepress.com/ils/sax/

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    28/32

    The Scott River Valley was once a stronghold for CohoSalmon in the Klamath River Basin. It could be again

    but that would require sharing the water.

    Since 1986 an estimated 25 million dollars from taxpayers has

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    29/32

    Since 1986 an estimated 25 million dollars from taxpayers hasflowed to the Scott River Valley for plans and projects to

    restore the watershed and salmon. Yet Scott River Chinookand Coho salmon continue to slide toward extinction.

    What would Scott River Valley streams look like today if the

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    30/32

    What would Scott River Valley streams look like today if the$25 million from taxpayers had instead been used to

    purchase winter stock watering rights from willing sellers andthat water had been returned to the streams?

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    31/32

    Is winter water use in the ScottRiver Valley reasonable?

  • 8/14/2019 WinterWtrUse Scott v Dec09

    32/32

    For More Information contactFelice Pace

    707-482-0354 [email protected]