wilson lee, campus planning portfolio
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
-
Wilson LeeThe Pennylvania State UniversityLandscape Architecture 2016Portfolio
-
Wilson Lee924 Bellaire AvenueAPT: W218State College, PA 16801
The Pennsylvania State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Minor in Architectural Studies Minor in Geographical Information Sciences (GIS) [Class of 2016]
-
C o n t e n t
The Unbroken Circle
Stepping Stone Park
West Campus Commons
Street Harmonics
01
02
03
04Models05Technical Work06
Wilson Lee
[Implementation]
[Competition] [Conceptual]
[Competition]
[Diagrammatic] [Implementation] [Process]
[Planting Design] [Conceptual]
[Planting Design] [Process]
-
West Campus Commons01The mixed garden planting over at West Campus is the perfect destination for those wanting to get away. The plantings are comprised mostly of herbaceous perennials with a couple of deciduous trees and shrubs for ornamentation and screening. The perennials are all pleasantly fragrant and attract wildlife to their flowers, making the pallet of yellows, blues, oranges, whites, and purple attractive not only to sight, but to smell and texture as well.
-
West Campus Commons SemesterSpring 2014
Type Planting Scheme
Software Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator,AutoCad
-
Play On The Go
Play Together
Play For All
Americans use walking as a regular mode of transportation on average
of 3 days a week.
51%of the travelling public.
3,291,401In 2005, an estimated
=
45.1%
25%of these walking trips
are used for recreational and social purposes, not work.
people used walking as their primary mode of travel for their
journey to work each week
Street Harmonics02Life is moving. Pedestrians in cities are readily in movement. Whether walking to work, to school, to anywhere - play is rarely a commodity experienced for those on-the-go. But no longer. Through manipulative play and melodies, Street Harmonics incorporates play on-the-go and activates fun within dense urban centers. Located on the street-scape, a place rarely recognized for play, Street Harmonics allows for musical play along sidewalks.
-
Rain Garden DemonstrationAs users play with the musical harp, its almost impossible not to notice the luxurious rain garden that the harp inhabits. With the rain garden, Street Harmonics not only improves aesthetics to city streets, but also promotes sustainable storm water management. Rain gardens allows for the inltration of water from street into the soil. Trees and native plants add greenery and aesthetics which contrast with the hardscape of the urban environment.
White Birch Rain Garden
Cinnamon Firn Rain Garden
Common Bomafast Rain Garden
Nickel Harp Strings Harp StructureConcrete
Curbing
River Stones Rain garden
Aluminum Tubing Harp Structure
Sandy Loam Top Soil Rain Garden
Pine Bark Mulch Rain Garden
6
3 (Soil Depth)
Street Harmonics Semester Summer 2013Type Design Competition
Team Wilson Lee, Tom Wenner, Julian New, Jeff Holzer
Sketchup, Photoshop, IllustratorSoftware
-
The Unbroken Circle
Slant High Honors Award
03After the Korean War ended in 1953, thousands of families were separated by the Demilitarized Zone. This zone which seperates North and South Korea stretches many hundreds of miles and is laden with mines, making it impossible to cross. Over 40,000 families sign up each each year in hopes to be reunitied with their families, while 3,000 family members pass away each year.
Between the towns of Daesong-dong (South Korea) and Kijong-dong (North Korea) is the place where the Unbro-ken Circle lies. This location is one of the last beacons of hope for Koreans as each town has a view of the other. This area between these towns is one of the only places along the DMZ where this is possible. The Unbroken Circle evokes memories of those missed, lost, and no longer in our lives. Through a contrast of unity and separation, the absence of human presence in this site helps remember those missing and why they were special.
2nd In Peoples Choice
-
The Unbroken Circle Semester Summer 2013Type Design Competition
Slant High Honors Award
Team Wilson Lee, Tom Wenner
Software Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator
Seeing my mom in my dreams is not a happy MEMORY, but Im happy I can at least see her in my dreams
-Yoon Hee, North Korean Refugee
-
North Korea
South Korea
DMZ Border
Location
Daeseong-dongKijong-dong
NOr
ient
atio
nSo
il Co
nditi
onEx
istin
g Vi
ews
Solar movement does not distract from the contemplative experience but enhances the figure of the inaccessible space.
The native soil and weather conditions at this site are ideal for growing native plants. Nearby are farming communi-ties that have existed for numerous decades indicating that the soil at this site is fertile.
Looking east a view of the South Korean town, Daeseong-Dong, is visible. Looking out from the glass west lies the North Korean town Kijong-Dong, bring these conflicting nations within the Unbroken Circle.
120,000 Families Seperated40,000 Families Waiting to be Reunited3,000 Family Members Pass Away Each
20,000,000
Families in South Korea
-
Korean Feather Reed Grass
Seibold Magnolia Korean Boxwood Lotus Flower Awabuki Ginkgo Biloba
Rose of Sharon
North Korean National Flower
South Korean National Flower
Symbol of Unity
Stone Wall Glass WeatheredStone Seat
Wood Path
Establishing common connection to Korean
Architecture.
Enables view of Kijong-dong beyond
site.
Standing the test of time waiting for unity.
Contemplative material which casually directs
to unity.
What Defines Memories?
Are they events, activities, or places we have gone? Or are they dominated by something else? Countless memories are shaped by the people with whom weve experienced these moments. Spending time with friends, traveling with family, or letting someone you love go; people define our memoriespeople that we have met, that we have loved, that we have lost. It is their absence which evokes their memory. Their departure from our lives conjures an absence within us, remind-ing us how special they were.
-
Stepping Stone Park04In the center of Bellefonte is a dilapidated parcel of land, void of recreational activities and exploration within the landscape. Stepping Stone Park offers a landscape where the neighborhood integrates the downtown district in order to communicate this fulcrum. Residents of the surrounding area are but a stones throw away from wide lawns, large plazas and a multitude of amenities that offer an atmosphere imbued with exploration and community.
Design Development
-
Semester Fall 2013
Type Conceptual Design
Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator, GIS,Rhino, FormZ, AutoCad, Modeling
Software
Stepping Stone Park
-
Original Site Conceptual Plan
0 100 200 400 800 1200
N
Floating Wetlands
New Bridge
Large open space for mixed use recreation
Pump House and Waterfront Museum
Medium Density Housing
Semi-Private Space
Old Match Factory Frame. Stripped for Pavement and other materials
Mixed use program consisting mostly of retail and high density housing
Mixed use program consisting of industry and offices
Semi-Private Space
Expanded Creek
Lawn Areas Remniscent of River Stone
Community Center Building
New Cafe on the Park
Playground
Existing Bridge
Courtyard space for Mixed Use recreation. Bosque
Community Center Building
Central Courtyard
Central Courtyard Extension
Riparian Buffer
Soil Stabilizing vegetation
-
Buildings: 374,444 sqft
Open Space: 612,861 sqft (36.56% of Site)
Building Percentage: 22.34% of site
Architecture
Spatial Relationship Architectural Program
3rd Fl
oor
2nd F
loor
Grou
nd Fl
oor
Office: 38,900 sqft 7.9% of Program
Community: 74,600 sqft 13.3% of Program
Residential: 217,000 sqft 38.8% of Program
Commercial: 64,900 sqft 11.6% of Program
Other: 144,000 sqft 25.7% of Program
Parking: 19,600 sqft 4.1% of Program
Circulation
Open Space
141,470 sqft36.32%%(bldgs) 8.11%(site)
68,418 sqft17.03%(bldgs) 3.81%(site)
14,422 sqft3.85%(bldgs) .86%(site)
9,543 sqft2.54%(bldgs) .56%(site)
36,019 sqft9.62%(bldgs) 2.15%(site)
2,075 sqft.55%(bldgs) .12%(site)
112,613 sqft30.07%(bldgs) 6.79%(site)
Semi-Private: 217,000 sqft
Central Courtyard: 217,000 sqft
Open Lawn: 217,000 sqft
Playground: 217,000 sqft
Wetland: 217,000 sqft
Primary Pedestrian Crossing
Primary Pedestrian Movement
Secondary Pedestrian Movement
Vehicular Movement
Creek Expansion45% Increase in Stream Size
Program RelationSemi Private
Semi Public
Public
Building
Decrease in Floodplain Zone
-
Models05Semester Fall 2012
Type Conceptual Design
Clay PaperNatural MaterialsManual Manipulation
Medium
A conceptual model of a contemplative space at Penn States Arboretum
Details
-
Semester Spring 2013
Type Site Model
Chip BoardLaser CutterManual Manipulation
Medium
Representative model of City Garden in St. Louis.
Details
Fall 2012
Conceptual Design
-
Semester Spring 2013
Type Site Model
MDFAcrylicWire MeshSteel NailsColored Paper
Medium
Diagrammatic model of Bellefonte, Pennsylvania
Details
-
Semester Spring 2013
Type Diagrammatic Model
Colored PaperInsulation FoamBalsa WoodMossFoam Core
Medium
Diagrammatic model of Bellefonte, Pennsylvania
Details
-
Technical Work06Type Hand Renderings
Type
-
Technical Work Type Materials Implementation
1 East WallScale: 38" = 1' Section Elevation
Scale: 38" = 1'
Larch 331Design Implementation
Thomas BuildingSitting Walls
State College, PA 16801
L - 4
Notes
Larch 331Last Revised
9/30/13Wilson Lee
Plan
Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage10'
3"
Fros
t Dep
th1'
0"
3' 2
"8"
Pre-Cast ConcreteCap StoneSmooth Finish(Gray, Width 22")
Railing, Steel
Red Brick7 1/2"x2 1/4" Nx,Type IIIGranite pavers,MortarlessSand-ConcreteSetting BaseCIP Concrete BaseCompactedAggregate BaseCompactedSubgrade
Vertical RebarReinforcement #4
12" Expansion Joint
Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish
Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details
Flush Mortar joint
Capstones flush to brick veneer
No Weepholes
CIP ConcreteStem Wall
CIP ConcreteSpread Footing
1 East WallScale: 38" = 1' Section Elevation
Scale: 38" = 1'
Larch 331Design Implementation
Thomas BuildingSitting Walls
State College, PA 16801
L - 5
Notes
Larch 331Last Revised
9/30/13Wilson Lee
Plan
Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage
Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details
Capstones flush to brick veneer
No Weepholes
10' 3
"
10"
3' 2
"
Fros
t Dep
th
1' 0
"
1' 10"
8' 0"
12' 5"
7' 3"
10' 10" 1' 10" 3' 1"
Steel Pin 6"x12"
Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")
Red brick 4x8,Running Bond
Veneer Anchors,Steel,Every 4 Courses
CMU 12"x8"x16"
Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish
CompactedAggregate Base
Compacted Subgrade
CIP ConcreteStem WallVertical RebarReinforcement #4
CIP ConcreteSpread Footing
Steel Pins 6"x 12"
12" Expansion Joint
Planting Soil
Red brick 4x8,Running Bond
Red brick 4x8,Running Bond
Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")
Railing Steel
Railing Steel
12" Expansion Joint
Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 30")
N
1 Brick and CIP Concrete PavementScale: 38" = 1'
2' 4'1'0'Context Plan
Scale: 38" = 1'
Larch 331Design Implementation
Thomas BuildingSitting Walls
State College, PA 16801
L - 1
Notes
Larch 331Last Revised
9/30/13Wilson Lee
Plan
Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage
33.44
TWBW
TW
BS
TW
BW
BW
TWBW
TS
BS
TW
TS
BS
TS
BS
BW
TW
BWBottomRamp
TopRamp
TS
BS
BS
TS
2L-2
1L-2
1L-3
Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details
3L-6
5L-6
2L-6
4L-6
1L-5
Capstones flush to brick veneer
No Weepholes
1L-4
N
1 West WallScale: 316 " = 1' Plan
Larch 331Design Implementation
Thomas BuildingSitting Walls
State College, PA 16801
L - 2
Notes
Larch 331Last Revised
9/30/13Wilson Lee
Refer to Grading Plan for Drainage
Treads Have 1% Wash. Seegrading plan for details6
.007
3
3' 5
"12
' 11"
2' 0
"
Pre-Cast Concrete Cap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")
Pre-Cast Concrete Cap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 30")
12" Gap Expansionbetween cap stone
2" Gap Expansionbetween cap stone
Railing, Steel, Diameter: 2"
12" Rubber Expansion JointBetween Stairs
Granite Pavers, Mortarless,Running Bond
Granite Pavers, Mortarless,Running Bond
4' 0
"5"
Fros
t Dep
th1'
0"
1' 10" 2' 6"
2' 1
0"
Steel Pin 6"x12"
Pre-Cast ConcreteCap Stone,Smooth Finish(White, Width: 22")Red brick 4x8,Running BondVeneer Anchors,Steel,Every 4 Courses
Electrical Conduit
CMU 12"x8"x16"Pre-Cast Concrete,Broom Finish
Vertical RebarReinforcement #4
CIP ConcreteSpread Footing
2 West WallScale: 38 " = 1' Section
CompactedAggregate BaseCompactedSubgrade
0' 1' 3' 5'
Flush Mortar JointCapstones flush to brick veneer
No Weepholes
Steel Pin 6"x12"
CIP ConcreteStem Wall
-
Type Plating Schedule
Drain Inlet
Lights
Plug Drift 2
Plug Drift 1
Plug Drift 3
Plug Drift 1
Plug Drift 4
Pliug Drift 5
Drian Inlet
-
Drain Inlet
Lights
Plug Drift 2
Plug Drift 1
Plug Drift 3
Plug Drift 1
Plug Drift 4
Pliug Drift 5
Drian Inlet
Scientific Name Common Name QuantityPlug Drift 1
Aster novae-angliae New England Aster 100Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 150Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe Pye 150Tradescantia ohiensis Ohio Spiderwort 150
Plug Drift 3
Aslepias syriaca Common Milkweed 50Aster laevis Smooth Aster 200
Plug Drift 4
Aster nove-angliae New England Aster 100Baptisia australis Blue False Indigo 100
Plug Drift 5
Cassia fasciculata Partridge Pea 150Rudbeckia hirta Black-Eyed Susan 150
Plug Drift 5Juncus effusus Joe Pye Weed 50Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 100Scutellaria integrifolia Hyssop Skullcap 100Spritanthes odorata Fragrant Ladies'-Tresses 50
Perennial Plug Drift Schedule
Scientific Name Common Name % Total WeightGrasses
Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem 24%Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Hair Grass 21%Sorghastrum natans Indian Grass 19%Tridens flavus Purpletop 18%
Forbs
Aster novae-angliae New England Aster 6%Echinacea purpurea Purple Coneflower 5%Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe Pye 3%Tradescantia ohiensis Ohio Spiderwort 4%
Scientific Name Common Name % Total WeightGrasses
Bouteloua curtipendula Side-oats Grama 30%Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem 24%Sporobolus compositus Tall Dropseed 33%
Forbs
Aslepias syriaca Common Milkweed 1%Aster laevis Smooth Aster 2%Aster nove-angliae New England Aster 4%Baptisia australis Blue False Indigo 3%Cassia fasciculata Partridge Pea 1%Rudbeckia hirta Black-Eyed Susan 2%
Scientific Name Common Name % Total WeightGrasses
Andropogon glomeratus Bushy Bluestem 24%Carex grayi Gray's Sedge 20%Scirpus validus Soft Steemed Bulbrush 42%
Forbs
Juncus effusus Joe Pye Weed 3%Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 3%Scutellaria integrifolia Hyssop Skullcap 4%Spritanthes odorata Fragrant Ladies'-Tresses 4%
1lb. PLS per 1,000 sq.ft
Wet Meadow Mix (#3 Tall Mix)
Short Grass Meadow (#2 Short Mix)
Warm Season Grass Meadow Mix (#1 Tall Mix)
-
Condisderations and Reminders.
- Driveway opening is fixed. Cannot be moved.
- There must be back porches behind the residents.
- The FFEs of the top floor must be 9 feet higher than the bottom floor.
- Consider putting an entry plaza for a focal point as well as an area that can collect runoff/ direct it.
- There has to be walkways con-necting the buildings to the park-ing lot. These might have to be stepped in order to walk with the contous.
- The round turn could get wet, causing dangerous conditions around the turn. Do not want Tokyo Drifting.
- Must have at least one retaining wall.
- Trees must be preserved.
- We do not want an engineer on site, so do not make retaining walls more than 4 feet tall.
- All slopes should be Desirable.
- Parking and entry must have 3 inch crown.
- Drain inlets can be useful possi-bly in spots where the contours become tight.
Type Grading
42
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
45
50
51
52
51
50
49
50
53
49
50
51
52
53
52
51
5049
52
51
50
49
48
51
52
50
49
48
47
46
45
5352
51 50
49
48
47
46
45
48
47
48
47
46
45
50
51
5253
54
TC 48.84BC 46.34
(48.64)
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 52.73BC 52.23
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 51.15BC 50.65
TC 48.99BC 48.49
TC 53.21BC 52.71
TC 53.03BC 52.53
TC 50.97BC 50.47
TC 51.39BC 50.89
TC 52.15BC 51.65
TC 48.78BC 48.28
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 50.18BC 50.68
TC 52.91BC 52.41
TC 53.06BC 52.56
TC 53.08BC 52.58
TC 52.13BC 51.63
TC 51.72BC 51.22
TC 50.14BC 49.74
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 53.28BC 52.78
TC 50.99BC 50.49
TC 51.44BC 50.94
TC 51.98BC 51.58
TC 50.79BC 50.29
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 51.51BC 51.01
TC 52.97BC 52.47
TC 53.07BC 52.57
TC 51.86BC 51.36
TC 50.49BC 49.99
49.90
51.03
TC 52.35BC 51.85
53.10
47.518
51.65
51.96
52.27
52.45
51.58
51.75
7.00%
51.9651.56
51.79
51.46
51.67
51.57
52.34
53.43
51.55
53.33
52.27
53.0352.92
54.66
53.33
54.66
53.23
50.65
53.84
TS 54.0054.00
52.43
50.56
52.1551.95
52.87
50.7150.91
52.13
51.11
50.36
50.81
50.26
BS 50.56TS 53.76
54.00
53.07
53.03
53.94
54.6654.66
BS 52.5
TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.0054.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
45.0045.00
45.0045.00
45.00
BS 50.65
54.00TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
BS 53.19TS 53.69
BS 53.1952.76
TS 53.69
54.0054.0054.00
54.00
54.6654.00
BS 52.14
TS 54.00
TS 54.00BS 52.14
BS 51.69
TS 54.00
BS 51.69TS 54.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
51.69
54.66
54.00
BS 52.5
51.85
2.10%
3.90%
4.08%
5.43
%
7.19
%
Project 2: Grading Plan forMultiple Structures, Walls,Parking and Access
Wilson LeeLarch 231Project 2
Existing Contour
Proposed Contour
Property Line
Parking Center Line
Slope Percentage
Spot Elevation
FFE
TW
BW
TS
BS
Tree
Finished Floor Elevation
Top of Wall
Bottom of Wall
Top of Stair
Bottom of Ramp
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
42
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
45
50
51
52
51
50
49
50
53
49
50
51
52
53
52
51
5049
52
51
50
49
48
51
52
50
49
48
47
46
45
5352
51 50
49
48
47
46
45
48
47
48
47
46
45
50
51
5253
54
TC 48.84BC 46.34
(48.64)
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 52.73BC 52.23
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 51.15BC 50.65
TC 48.99BC 48.49
TC 53.21BC 52.71
TC 53.03BC 52.53
TC 50.97BC 50.47
TC 51.39BC 50.89
TC 52.15BC 51.65
TC 48.78BC 48.28
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 50.18BC 50.68
TC 52.91BC 52.41
TC 53.06BC 52.56
TC 53.08BC 52.58
TC 52.13BC 51.63
TC 51.72BC 51.22
TC 50.14BC 49.74
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 53.28BC 52.78
TC 50.99BC 50.49
TC 51.44BC 50.94
TC 51.98BC 51.58
TC 50.79BC 50.29
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 51.51BC 51.01
TC 52.97BC 52.47
TC 53.07BC 52.57
TC 51.86BC 51.36
TC 50.49BC 49.99
49.90
51.03
TC 52.35BC 51.85
53.10
47.518
51.65
51.96
52.27
52.45
51.58
51.75
7.00%
51.9651.56
51.79
51.46
51.67
51.57
52.34
53.43
51.55
53.33
52.27
53.0352.92
54.66
53.33
54.66
53.23
50.65
53.84
TS 54.0054.00
52.43
50.56
52.1551.95
52.87
50.7150.91
52.13
51.11
50.36
50.81
50.26
BS 50.56TS 53.76
54.00
53.07
53.03
53.94
54.6654.66
BS 52.5
TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.0054.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
45.0045.00
45.0045.00
45.00
BS 50.65
54.00TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
BS 53.19TS 53.69
BS 53.1952.76
TS 53.69
54.0054.0054.00
54.00
54.6654.00
BS 52.14
TS 54.00
TS 54.00BS 52.14
BS 51.69
TS 54.00
BS 51.69TS 54.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
51.69
54.66
54.00
BS 52.5
51.85
2.10%
3.90%
4.08%
5.43
%
7.19
%
Project 2: Grading Plan forMultiple Structures, Walls,Parking and Access
Wilson LeeLarch 231Project 2
Existing Contour
Proposed Contour
Property Line
Parking Center Line
Slope Percentage
Spot Elevation
FFE
TW
BW
TS
BS
Tree
Finished Floor Elevation
Top of Wall
Bottom of Wall
Top of Stair
Bottom of Ramp
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
-
42
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
45
50
51
52
51
50
49
50
53
49
50
51
52
53
52
51
5049
52
51
50
49
48
51
52
50
49
48
47
46
45
5352
51 50
49
48
47
46
45
48
47
48
47
46
45
50
51
5253
54
TC 48.84BC 46.34
(48.64)
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 52.73BC 52.23
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 51.15BC 50.65
TC 48.99BC 48.49
TC 53.21BC 52.71
TC 53.03BC 52.53
TC 50.97BC 50.47
TC 51.39BC 50.89
TC 52.15BC 51.65
TC 48.78BC 48.28
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 50.18BC 50.68
TC 52.91BC 52.41
TC 53.06BC 52.56
TC 53.08BC 52.58
TC 52.13BC 51.63
TC 51.72BC 51.22
TC 50.14BC 49.74
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 53.28BC 52.78
TC 50.99BC 50.49
TC 51.44BC 50.94
TC 51.98BC 51.58
TC 50.79BC 50.29
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 51.51BC 51.01
TC 52.97BC 52.47
TC 53.07BC 52.57
TC 51.86BC 51.36
TC 50.49BC 49.99
49.90
51.03
TC 52.35BC 51.85
53.10
47.518
51.65
51.96
52.27
52.45
51.58
51.75
7.00%
51.9651.56
51.79
51.46
51.67
51.57
52.34
53.43
51.55
53.33
52.27
53.0352.92
54.66
53.33
54.66
53.23
50.65
53.84
TS 54.0054.00
52.43
50.56
52.1551.95
52.87
50.7150.91
52.13
51.11
50.36
50.81
50.26
BS 50.56TS 53.76
54.00
53.07
53.03
53.94
54.6654.66
BS 52.5
TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.0054.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
45.0045.00
45.0045.00
45.00
BS 50.65
54.00TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
BS 53.19TS 53.69
BS 53.1952.76
TS 53.69
54.0054.0054.00
54.00
54.6654.00
BS 52.14
TS 54.00
TS 54.00BS 52.14
BS 51.69
TS 54.00
BS 51.69TS 54.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
51.69
54.66
54.00
BS 52.5
51.85
2.10%
3.90%
4.08%
5.43
%
7.19
%
Project 2: Grading Plan forMultiple Structures, Walls,Parking and Access
Wilson LeeLarch 231Project 2
Existing Contour
Proposed Contour
Property Line
Parking Center Line
Slope Percentage
Spot Elevation
FFE
TW
BW
TS
BS
Tree
Finished Floor Elevation
Top of Wall
Bottom of Wall
Top of Stair
Bottom of Ramp
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
42
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
47
46
45
50
51
52
51
50
49
50
53
49
50
51
52
53
52
51
5049
52
51
50
49
48
51
52
50
49
48
47
46
45
5352
51 50
49
48
47
46
45
48
47
48
47
46
45
50
51
5253
54
TC 48.84BC 46.34
(48.64)
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 52.73BC 52.23
TC 52.89BC 52.39
TC 51.15BC 50.65
TC 48.99BC 48.49
TC 53.21BC 52.71
TC 53.03BC 52.53
TC 50.97BC 50.47
TC 51.39BC 50.89
TC 52.15BC 51.65
TC 48.78BC 48.28
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 50.18BC 50.68
TC 52.91BC 52.41
TC 53.06BC 52.56
TC 53.08BC 52.58
TC 52.13BC 51.63
TC 51.72BC 51.22
TC 50.14BC 49.74
TC 50.55BC 50.05
TC 53.28BC 52.78
TC 50.99BC 50.49
TC 51.44BC 50.94
TC 51.98BC 51.58
TC 50.79BC 50.29
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 53.47BC 52.97
TC 51.51BC 51.01
TC 52.97BC 52.47
TC 53.07BC 52.57
TC 51.86BC 51.36
TC 50.49BC 49.99
49.90
51.03
TC 52.35BC 51.85
53.10
47.518
51.65
51.96
52.27
52.45
51.58
51.75
7.00%
51.9651.56
51.79
51.46
51.67
51.57
52.34
53.43
51.55
53.33
52.27
53.0352.92
54.66
53.33
54.66
53.23
50.65
53.84
TS 54.0054.00
52.43
50.56
52.1551.95
52.87
50.7150.91
52.13
51.11
50.36
50.81
50.26
BS 50.56TS 53.76
54.00
53.07
53.03
53.94
54.6654.66
BS 52.5
TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.0054.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
54.00
45.0045.00
45.0045.00
45.00
BS 50.65
54.00TS 54.00
54.00
54.00
BS 53.19TS 53.69
BS 53.1952.76
TS 53.69
54.0054.0054.00
54.00
54.6654.00
BS 52.14
TS 54.00
TS 54.00BS 52.14
BS 51.69
TS 54.00
BS 51.69TS 54.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
BW 45.66TW 48.00BW 45.00
BW 45.00TW 48.00BW 45.66
51.69
54.66
54.00
BS 52.5
51.85
2.10%
3.90%
4.08%
5.43
%
7.19
%
Project 2: Grading Plan forMultiple Structures, Walls,Parking and Access
Wilson LeeLarch 231Project 2
Existing Contour
Proposed Contour
Property Line
Parking Center Line
Slope Percentage
Spot Elevation
FFE
TW
BW
TS
BS
Tree
Finished Floor Elevation
Top of Wall
Bottom of Wall
Top of Stair
Bottom of Ramp
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY
AN
AU
TOD
ESK
ED
UC
ATI
ON
AL
PRO
DU
CT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRO
DU
CED
BY A
N A
UTO
DESK
EDU
CA
TION
AL PR
OD
UC
T
-
Wilson Lee924 Bellaire AvenueAPT: W218State College, PA 16801
The Pennsylvania State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Minor in Architectural Studies Minor in Geographical Information Sciences (GIS) [Class of 2016]
-
T H A N K Y O U Wilson Lee
modelpageContent pagesOthermoreWilsonLeeotherPortfolio 85x11HQ
Portfolio 85x11HQcampusplanning