will osha put you in jail? an interactive look at ... legal presentation.pdf · the accident and at...
TRANSCRIPT
www.laborlawyers.com 1
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Will OSHA Put You in Jail? An
Interactive Look at Inspections
and Concerns About Criminal
laborlawyers.com
Atlanta · Baltimore · Boston · Charlotte · Chicago · Cleveland · Columbia · Columbus · Dallas · Denver · Fort Lauderdale · Gulfport
Houston · Irvine · Kansas City · Las Vegas · Los Angeles · Louisville · Memphis · New Jersey · New Orleans
Orlando · Philadelphia · Phoenix · Portland · San Antonio · San Diego · San Francisco · Seattle · Tampa · Washington, DC
Howard A. Mavity |Travis W. Vance
April 21, 2016
www.laborlawyers.com 2
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
www.laborlawyers.com
WHAT MAKES AN EMPLOYEE’S DEATH WORSE?
Few things are as terrible as losing one of your employees.
Guilt is normal and even good. One’s shock and remorse stems from
one’s basic decency.
• Now assume that the local DA and law enforcement are interested …
and perhaps the ATF because an explosion occurred … which means
that the Chemical Safety Board and State and Local Fire Marshalls are
involved.
• Or maybe you lost a tower crane in New York City or Philadelphia, and
now, both law enforcement and other investigators on site looking at
the accident and at your history with the City Inspectors.
• Or maybe a chemical release occurred … and it’s a slow news day.
www.laborlawyers.com 3
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
www.laborlawyers.com
QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF
• When should I worry about criminal exposure?
• What factors raise concerns?
• When should we lawyer up?
– Where is the job?
– What caused the fatality … fall, trenching, explosion, crane
collapse, chemical release?
– OSHA Emphasis areas?
– Local political climate, including elections?
– Number of Federal, State and Local agencies investigating?
– Multiemployer site?
– New Hires Temps, Subs involved?
www.laborlawyers.com 4
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
www.laborlawyers.com
PUT ON YOUR PARANOIA CAP
View your facts in the most negative fashion ….
• Did you or should you have known of the hazard?
• Did your GL insurer audit raise concerns about the dust
collection system?
• Have supervisors cut corners before on Confined Space
Entry?
• Was the project running behind … does it look as if
supervisors or customers were pushing?
• Were lift meetings properly handled, Operator training
and certification, maintenance?
www.laborlawyers.com 5
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
CITATIONS UNDER THE ACT
www.laborlawyers.com 6
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
OSHA HAS THE BURDEN TO PROVE CERTAIN
ELEMENTS
• Existence of a Hazard
• Exposure
• Applicable Standard
• Employer knew of or should have known of the Hazard
with the exercise of Due Diligence
www.laborlawyers.com 7
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
SECTION 5(a)(1) GENERAL DUTY CITATIONS
• Existence of a Hazard
• Exposure
• Employer knew of or should have known of the existence
of the Hazard
• Hazard recognized by the Employer’s Industry
• Recognized Abatement
www.laborlawyers.com 8
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
SUPERVISOR ROLE IN OSHA CITATIONS:
LEARNING OF OSHA VIOLATIONS
“Because employers can only obtain knowledge through
their agents, the actions and knowledge of supervisory
personnel are generally imputed to their employers, and
the Secretary can make a prima facie showing of
knowledge by providing that a supervisory employee knew
of or was responsible for the violation.”
www.laborlawyers.com 9
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
UNPREVENTABLE EMPLOYEE
MISCONDUCT DEFENSE ELEMENTS
• Establish work rules designed to ensure safe work and to avoid
OSHA violations
• Communicate the work rules to employees
• Train the employees as needed
• Take appropriate steps to discover violations
• Effectively enforce the rules and practices when violations are
discovered; and
• Document the above actions
www.laborlawyers.com 10
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
MOST PREVALENT
TYPES OF CITATIONS
•Other than Serious
• Serious
• Repeat
•Willful
•Varies in some State Plans, such as under
Cal-OSHA.
www.laborlawyers.com 11
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
OTHER THAN SERIOUS
A violation that has a direct
relationship to job safety and health,
but is not serious in nature, is
classified as “other-than-serious.”
($0-7,000)
www.laborlawyers.com 12
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
SERIOUS
A serious violation exists when the
workplace hazard could cause an accident or
illness that would most likely result in
death or serious physical harm, unless the
employer did not know or could not have
known of the violation.
($0-7,000) ($12,500?)
www.laborlawyers.com 13
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
REPEAT
An employer may be cited for a repeated
violation if the employer has been cited
previously for the same or a substantially
similar condition and, for a serious violation,
OSHA's inspection history for the employer
lists a previous OSHA Citation issued within
the past three years.
($0-70,000) ($125,000??)
www.laborlawyers.com 14
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
WILLFUL
A willful violation is a violation in which
the employer either knowingly failed
to comply with a legal requirement
(purposeful disregard) or acted with
plain indifference to employee safety.($0-70,000) ($125,000??)
www.laborlawyers.com 15
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
PENALTIES – CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS
• Willful violation & employee death:
$10,000 or 6 months or both
• Second conviction:
$20,000 or 12 months or both
• Advance notice of inspection
$1,000 or 6 months or both
• Falsification of required records, etc.
$10,000 or 6 months or both
• Murder or attempted murder of CO
Term of years to life
www.laborlawyers.com 16
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
ADMINISTRATION’S FOCUS ON CRIMINAL
ENFORCEMENT OF WORKPLACE SAFETY
• The Administration’s supporters genuinely want to put employers in jail.
• Appointed Leadership believes that more prosecutions should occur and should focus on individuals; not just companies.
• Criminal focus is more common in non-safety settings, such as finance and environmental claims.
• Bad facts make bad law – as in the case of the OSHA Temporary Employee Initiative, a few egregious cases support the effort.
• The OSH Act has limited provisions for criminal action and limited teeth.
• Most high profile Fed cases and many State cases involved false testimony and evidence issues.
www.laborlawyers.com 17
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
ADMINISTRATION’S FOCUS ON CRIMINAL
ENFORCEMENT OF WORKPLACE SAFETY
• For all of the talk and periodic pronouncements, OSHA criminal prosecution have never been a big priority to OSHA leadership.
• Career leadership, especially at the Regional level, which has the biggest role, have been wary of Fed criminal actions.
• Same for Solicitors to some extent.
• With their large workload and constant demands from D.C., US Attorneys have never had much interest in Fed OSHA prosecution.
www.laborlawyers.com 18
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Elements of the Crime
• Defendant was the employer;
• Defendant violated an OSHA Standard;
• The violation directly caused an employee’s death; and
• Defendant willfully committed the violation.
www.laborlawyers.com 19
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
New Developments – Not Just Smoke
• New York and Philadelphia local prosecutions
• Cal-OSHA Bumble Bee Tuna
• 27 year sentence to Peanut Company CEO for salmonella
• Allman Biopic Criminal case
• Late 2015 – Regional Administrators approach US Attorneys and
some AGs;
• Yates Memo
• U.S. v. Gordon Smith
• Atlantic States Steel Pipe
www.laborlawyers.com 20
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Corporate Liability• If there are grounds to criminally prosecute a corporation, the
corporation may be held vicariously liable for acts/omissions
committed by an agent of the corporation if the act is committed:
• within the scope of the agent’s employment, and
• with some intention of benefitting the corporation.
Corporations may also be held vicariously liable for acts committed by an
agent of the corporation’s subsidiary.
Officers and directors of a corporation may be held liable for corporate
actions even if they are unaware of the misconduct.
www.laborlawyers.com 21
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Know the Law : Fatality Cases
www.laborlawyers.com 22
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Obstruction of Justice
18 USC § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments,
agencies, and committees
– Corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or
communication
– Influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence,
obstruct, or impede
– The due and proper administration of the law under which any
pending proceeding is being had before any U.S. department or
agency
– Penalty: Fine and/or 5 years imprisonment.
www.laborlawyers.com 23
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Obstruction of Justice18 USC § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy
– Knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry
– In any record, document, or tangible object
– With the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any U.S. dept or agency. . . or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case.
– Penalty: Fine and/or 20 years imprisonment.
www.laborlawyers.com 24
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Mail Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1341—Elements of Mail Fraud
– Having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud
(or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and
– Use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting
to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).
www.laborlawyers.com 25
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Conspiracy
18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
– Two or more persons conspire
– Either to commit any offense against the U.S., or to defraud the U.S., or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,
– And one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy…
– Penalty: Fine and 5 years imprisonment or both, unlessthe object offense is a misdemeanor (penalty cannot exceed the max penalty for the misdemeanor).
www.laborlawyers.com 26
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
CASE STUDY
How does the threat of criminal investigation affect
the OSHA Inspection and Enforcement Process?
www.laborlawyers.com 27
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
In April 2013, your Raleigh facility was cited
for one serious violation of a fall protection
standard and a serious violation of a
personal protective equipment (PPE)
standard. Both citations carry a proposed
penalty of $7,000.
www.laborlawyers.com 28
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
At the informal conference NC OSHA offers you the
following proposal:
- Reduce the PPE violation to Other than Serious and
$3,500
- Reduce the fall protection violation to Other than
Serious and $0
Do you accept NC OSHA’s deal?
• A. Yes
• B. No
28
www.laborlawyers.com 29
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Three Years Later – April 21, 2016 . . .
An OSHA Inspector (CSHO) is at the door, demanding to
conduct an inspection of your Gastonia facility.
Q. Do you have to allow this inspection?
A. Yes
B. No
C. Maybe
www.laborlawyers.com 30
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
SHOULD YOU DEMAND A WARRANT?
• A policy call
• Few employers routinely require warrants
• May be necessary to gain time, such as when a manager
or counsel genuinely needs to be present
• An “ex parte” procedure
• What if you have concerns about criminal exposure?
www.laborlawyers.com 31
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE INSPECTION
ALWAYS REMEMBER
• It is your site!• You have rights. . .
– Inspection conducted in a reasonable manner
– Inspection conducted during a reasonable time
• Completion of inspection within 6 months
• Be cooperative and responsive but maintain control of the inspection
• Fatalities present issues due to urgency;• Law Enforcement often involved in fatality,
but not investigating a “crime scene.”
www.laborlawyers.com 32
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
OPENING CONFERENCE
• Ascertain purpose of the inspection– May affect scope, attitude and importance!
• Establish “scope” of the Inspection – get copy of complaint if applicable
• Set ground rules for inspection
• Don’t volunteer information – that’s the investigator’s job.
• Treat the Inspector in a professional fashion
• Notification of corporate officials and counsel
• Coordination with on-site contractors and vendors
• Trade secret issues
• Documents- Next Question!
www.laborlawyers.com 33
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
During the Opening Conference, the CSHO asks for the following documents.
1. Your entire LOTO policy;
2. All new hire/orientation safety training for last five years;
3. Your OSHA 300 Logs;
4. The operator’s manual for your powered industrial trucks; and
5. Your MSDS (now SDS) sheets.
Do you give him all of these documents?
A. Yes
B. No
www.laborlawyers.com 34
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
MAINTAINING CONTROL
• Includes determining before an inspection...
– What OSHA standards are applicable – do you comply?
– Know OSHA Emphasis areas
– Assure support staff (receptionists, secretaries, guards) are trained.
– Know what to say when government is at your door.
– Who is the right company person to contact, including your counsel?
– Have a written OSHA response plan in place.
– MUST have Catastrophe Response or Critical Incident Team in place BEFORE Fatalities, including advice on Criminal considerations.
www.laborlawyers.com 35
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
PRE-INSPECTION ACTION PLAN
• OSHA Poster
• Assignment of responsibilities
• Training (documented, including OJT and temps)
• Recordkeeping
• Housekeeping
• Hazard Assessment and abatement
• PPE needed during inspection
• Review of previous citations
• Review of insurance and third-party audits
• Periodic self-audits and reviews
• If using temporary employees, check 300 logs and training
www.laborlawyers.com 36
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
THE WALKAROUND
• Inspection may last several hours or several months; the CSHO may come back
• Employer – right to accompany Compliance Officer (“CSHO”)
• An Employee Representative, if any, must be permitted to attend entire inspection
• Limit the area seen by the CSHO –OSHA expects this action – require reason to expand scope and preserve evidence.
www.laborlawyers.com 37
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Keep All Requests within the
Scope of the Inspection
• “Please provide names of all temporary
workers.”
• “Please provide name of all contractors working
on site while I was present.”
• “If you don’t provide the lock-out tag-out
program by today at 5:00 p.m., I will note that it
does not exist.”
www.laborlawyers.com 38
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
2016- What’s New with OSHA Inspections
1. First penalty increases since 1990
- Serious- increase from $7,000 to $12,500
- Willful/repeat- increase from $70,000 to $125,000
2. Weight-based inspections
- Fewer, more complex inspections
3. Company-wide abatement initiative
- Sec. of Labor v. Central Transport, LLC
4. New reporting requirements- Amputations/in-patient hospitalization, loss of eye
5. Expanding Complaint-Based Inspections (Why?)
5. Be aware of State Plan differences.
www.laborlawyers.com 39
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Back to the Inspection . . .
You take the CSHO to your three story lobby where you
find 2 employees of a subcontractor working to install
equipment about 25 feet above the ground, without fall
protection.
The CSHO takes a video of the work being done
and asks you whether you think the workers should
have fall protection.
www.laborlawyers.com 40
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Q. Do you have to allow the CSHO to
videotape or take photographs?
A. Yes
B. No
www.laborlawyers.com 41
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
THE INSPECTION
• CSHO will usually take photographs– Video equipment – Right to protect proprietary trade secrets
• CSHO may perform relevant tests– e.g., air sampling, noise monitoring
• Advise CSHO that only side-by-side sampling or monitoring will be allowed (problems with Salt Lake OSHA Lab)
• Have your IH specialist watch the calibration process
• We’re developing our defenses throughout the inspection
www.laborlawyers.com 42
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Do you answer the CSHO’s question about
whether the workers should have fall protection?
A. Yes
B. No
www.laborlawyers.com 43
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
As you talk near where the work is being conducted,
one of your supervisors and an hourly worker walks by
discussing whether the subcontractor employees should
be wearing fall protection. The CSHO wants to
interview the hourly worker and the supervisor.
Q. Do you have to permit these interviews?
A. Yes
B. No
C. It depends
www.laborlawyers.com 44
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Q. Can you (or someone else) sit
in on these interviews?
A. Yes
B. No
C. It depends
www.laborlawyers.com 45
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Q: Should you sign a witness statement?
A. Yes
B. No
www.laborlawyers.com 46
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
• Interviews
– Schedule away from production floor or work area
– Normally in company conference room
• Signed statement
• Deposition
THE INSPECTION
www.laborlawyers.com 47
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
THE INSPECTION
• Hourly employee interviews
– OSHA takes position no management present
– Up to employee – can have Employee Representative
– Advise employee of his/her rights, appreciation of cooperation, and to tell the truth
• Warning: Employees have whistleblower rights. Be sensitive to not appear to OSHA or the employee to be coercing the employee or soliciting misrepresentations.
• What if a criminal investigation is open?
– Individual counsel? Obstruction? Conspiracy? Evidence?
www.laborlawyers.com 48
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Assume that two employees were crushed after
the walls of a trench collapsed.
www.laborlawyers.com 49
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
During the Inspection, your internal investigation quickly reveals that
the supervisor overseeing the work knew that the trench was unstable
but told the workers to enter the area without a trench box.
Q: Do you fire the supervisor?
A: Yes
B: No
Q: Do you hire counsel for the supervisor?
A: Yes
B: No
www.laborlawyers.com 50
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
How to Handle These Facts?
• Boxes were available.
• Supervisor was an older employee but a new hire. He worked for another contractor for many years and you assumed that he was well trained. In safety walkarounds, your site safety professional mentioned that he was a bit rigid and “did things like he had always done the work.”
• Unbeknown to you, the supervisor was involved at a trenching fatality and a Fed-OSHA inspection in Illinois years before and fired.
• He and the customer engineer had talked at length that morning about being behind and how to catch up the work.
• One of the employees was well trained and the other was new, and while he received training, his language and literacy skills were weak.
• Regular safety walkarounds occur at your jobs, as well as periodic visits by the regional safety manager.
• A sub complained to one of your project engineers that your employees “not working safely” a few days before, but provided no facts.
• It’s been a rainy month.
www.laborlawyers.com 51
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
How do you handle the investigation of the fatality?
Do you take written witness statements?
A. Yes
B. No
Do you have counsel on site?
A. Yes
B. No
What documents are most important for defenses and challenges to
OSHA making out the elements ?
A. What about willful concerns?
B. Criminal concerns?
www.laborlawyers.com 52
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
CLOSING CONFERENCE
• Employer’s opportunity for free discovery
• Advise of observed unsafe conditions
• Usually, brief description as to possible violations – no discussion of penalties,
classification and abatement dates
• Note any abatement made during the inspection
• Suggest possible corrections
• Request photos and monitoring results
• Discuss appeal rights
• Not a time for debate
• Take good notes and attempt to better understand any possible citations
www.laborlawyers.com 53
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Citation 1 Item 1 Type of Violation: REPEAT
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Employees working on a walking/working surface with
an unprotected side more than 6 feet above the lower level were not protected
from falling:
(a) On or about April 21, 2016 and at times prior, the employer did not
ensure that workers were protected from fall hazards. The crew was exposed to
falls of over 25 feet when they were not wearing fall protection at the employer’s
construction site.
This is a repeat of an earlier citation for violation of 29 CFR
§1926.501(b)(1), Inspection No. 12345678, of employer’s Pittsburgh facility,
which became a final order on January 30, 2013.
Date By Which Violation Must be Abated: 5/31/2016
Proposed Penalty: $70,000.00
www.laborlawyers.com 54
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Citation 2 Item 1 Type of Violation: WILLFUL
29 CFR 1926.651(k) Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems shall be made
by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could result in possible cave-ins, indications of failure
of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions. An inspection shall be
conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift.
Inspections shall also be made after every rainstorm or other hazard increasing occurrence. These inspections
are only required when employee exposure can be reasonably anticipated.
(a) On or about April 21, 2016 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that workers were
protected from collapse hazards while working in a trench. Two members of the employers crew were killed
when the trench they were working in was not protected with a trench box that was readily accessible. The
employer was aware of this recognized hazard but deliberately subjected its employees to these conditions.
Date By Which Violation Must be Abated: 5/31/2016
Proposed Penalty: $70,000.00
This matter will also be forwarded to the NC Department of Justice for criminal prosecution of Manager
John Smith and Supervisor Gary Doe.
www.laborlawyers.com 55
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
CITATION OPTIONS
• Agree to citations, pay full penalty
• Informal conference/informal settlement
• Notice of Contest – 15 working days (Federal); some state plan states different time period
• Formal settlement
• Hearing
www.laborlawyers.com 56
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Q. Are there any considerations other than
the amount of fines/penalties?
A. Yes
B. No
www.laborlawyers.com 57
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Some of the Additional Costs of
Accepting OSHA Violations
1. Abatement costs- How much will it cost to make the changes/repairs OSHA requires? Is it still feasible to do your work?
2. Repeat/willful costs (3-5 years)
3. Increased insurance/bond premiums
4. Opportunity Costs (Has your company ever been cited for an OSHA violation?); new federal regulations/black list
5. Public perception
6. Use of OSHA citation as evidence of negligence in companion liability case
7. Referral to other agencies, leading to additional penalties (e.g., EPA)
8. Circumventing Exclusive Remedy provisions? Criminal? Individual liability?
www.laborlawyers.com 58
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Q. The informal conference is our last chance
to resolve the matter on favorable terms before
“going to war” with OSHA by contesting the
Citations and having a hearing/trial.
A. True
B. False
www.laborlawyers.com 59
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
HEARINGS
• Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
• Formal complaint and answer
• Discovery similar to Federal Court
• Hearing before Administrative Law Judge
• ALJ issues written opinion
• Appeal to three-member Review Commission
• Other options – expedited proceedings
www.laborlawyers.com 60
© Copyright 2015All Rights Reserved
Thank You
Atlanta · Baltimore · Boston · Charlotte · Chicago · Cleveland · Columbia · Columbus · Dallas · Denver · Fort Lauderdale · Gulfport
Houston · Irvine · Kansas City · Las Vegas · Los Angeles · Louisville · Memphis · New England · New Jersey · New Orleans
Orlando · Philadelphia · Phoenix · Portland · San Antonio · San Diego · San Francisco · Tampa · Washington, DC
www.laborlawyers.com
Howard A. Mavity | Travis W. Vance