why clean label webinar
TRANSCRIPT
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 1/51
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 2/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Outline
• Clean label defined
• Market overview
• Challenges encountered when formulating clean label
• Functional native starches
• Example case studies
• Summary and recommendations
2
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 3/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Clean Label Market
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 4/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
―Clean Label‖ defined:
1. Free from chemical additives
2. Simple ingredient listing thatconsumers understand
3. Foods processed using
traditional techniques orthat are minimally processed
4
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 5/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
MarketInnova: Top 10 Trends—#1, Pure Is the New Natural
• 17% of total global new product launches werepositioned as natural, additive-/preservative-free, or both
• More and more products recently launched use wordslike simple and pure as descriptors
5
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 6/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
MarketMintel: 2012 North American CPG Trend Predictions
Natural now appears at all price points, making it available for everyone.
Delicious yogurt made with just 7 to 9 simple, natural ingredients
(depending on flavor) that are easy to recognize and understand.In Dannon Pure, creamy milk and swirls of fruity flavor are blendedtogether for a smooth taste that will delight both kids and parents.
And savvy moms will love its great low price!
6
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 7/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
MarketSize
• U.S. retail sales of natural and organic foods and beverages estimated atover $47 billion in 2011
• The retail market for natural and organic foods and beverages will grow atan average yearly rate of 13% or more
Source: Packaged Facts: Natural and Organic Foods and Beverages in the U.S., 3rd Edition,July 2011
7
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 8/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Market:Clean Label Positioning in NAM
On average, 30% of all new products launched hada clean label positioning over the past 5 years.
8
Source: Innova, NPL, NAM, Jun 2012
Clean Label Claims
1. Natural
2. No additives/preservatives
3. Organic
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 9/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
MarketConsumer Trends
• To the majority of shoppers, natural is first about what is NOT in the product
• Shoppers want ingredients they recognize on the label
• Most shoppers feel that a product being natural makes it healthier and safer
9
Source: Health Focus International Natural Report, 2011
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 10/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Cleaning Up Labels:Challenges and Opportunities
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 11/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Example Market Product:Seafood Soup
Ingredients
Clam broth, potatoes, clams, soybean oil, water, modified food starch,onions. Contains less than 1% of: soy protein concentrate, sugar, salt,cream, butter, sodium phosphate, potassium chloride, artificial
color , DATEM, lobster powder, natural flavor, shrimp, crab powder,
parsley (dried), celery (dried), fish powder, tuna extract, spice, yeastextract, corn protein (hydrolyzed), whey.
11
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 12/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Example Market Product:Sweet Cake-Type Dessert
Ingredients
Enriched wheat flour [flour, reduced iron, B vitamins (niacin, thiaminemononitrate (B1), riboflavin (B2), folic acid)], corn syrup, sugar, highfructose corn syrup, water, partially hydrogenated vegetable and/or animalshortening (soybean, cottonseed and/or canola oil, beef fat), whole eggs,
dextrose. Contains 2% or less of: modified corn starch, glucose,leavenings (sodium acid pyrophosphate, baking soda, monocalcium
phosphate), sweet dairy whey, soy protein isolate, calcium and sodium
caseinate, salt, mono and diglycerides, polysorbate 60, soy lecithin, soyflour, cornstarch, cellulose gum, sodium stearoyl lactylate, natural andartificial flavors, sorbic acid (to retain freshness), yellow 5, red 40.
12
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 13/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Example Market Product:Tartar Sauce
Ingredients
Soybean oil, distilled vinegar, cucumbers, corn syrup, egg yolks,salt, spice, dried onion, xanthan gum, potassium sorbate andsodium benzoate (preservatives), guar gum, dried red bellpeppers, natural flavors, alum, turmeric and polysorbate 80.
Calcium disodium EDTA added to protect flavor.
13
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 14/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Key Challenges in Cleaning Up Ingredient Labels
e.g., hydroxypropyl cellulose, propyleneglycol alginate, xanthan gum, modifiedstarch, bleached flour
e.g., mono- or diglycerides, DATEM,
polysorbate 80, hydrogenated vegetable oil
e.g., artificial flavors, yellow 5, red 40,sorbic acid, calcium disodium EDTA
e.g., sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate
14
Flavor/Flavor
Enhancers/Stabilizers
or Color Replacement
Fat or Emulsifier
Replacement
Texturizing System
Replacement
Preservative
Replacement
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 15/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Options for Clean Label Formulations
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 16/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated 16
Function Ingredients Alternatives available Challenge
Structure Bleached and bromated flour Unbleached flour
PreservativesSorbate/ benzoatepreservatives
Fermentates (e.g., cultured dextrose/skim milk):
effective against yeast, mold and gram-positive bacteria
Oxidativestability
EDTA
Green tea extract
Rosemary extract
Oregano extract
Fat source Partially hydrogenated oil Palm oil, vegetable oil
Texture Modified food starch Functional native starch
Leavening agentSodium aluminum sulfate,Sodium aluminum phosphate
Monocalcium phosphate
Color Artificial colors Natural fruit- and vegetable-based colors
Flavor Artificial flavors Natural flavors
Emulsifier/
stabilizer
Mono- and diglycerides,DATEM, sodium and calcium
caseinate, polysorbate 80
Lecithin
Flavor enhancer Monosodium glutamate Natural flavor enhancers
Difficult to meet Works in many situations Works in most/all situations
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 17/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Properties of Native Starches
• Narrow peak viscosity range
• Very limited process tolerance
• Undesirable texture
17
MVAG
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time (min)
B r a b e n
d e r V i s c o s i t y ( B U )
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
T e m p e r a t u r e ( C )
Native Starch
Temp
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 18/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Functional Native StarchesDefined
Starches that possess the functionality of traditional modified starchesand can be labeled according to their base description:
(e.g., ―corn/maize starch‖ or ―tapioca starch‖)
18
Traditional modified starch vs. functional native starch
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 19/51Copyright © 2012 Ingredion IncorporatedCopyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Functional Native StarchesFeatures and Benefits
• Temperature tolerance
• pH tolerance
• Shear tolerance
• Smooth, short texture
• Non-pasty mouthfeel
• Simple label
• Easy to use
19
Traditional modified starch
Functional native starch
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 20/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Process Tolerance
20
Starch Viscosity Comparison
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time
B r a b e n d e r V i s c o s i t y ( B U )
Native Traditional Modified Functional Native
6% solids in pH 3.0 buffer
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 21/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Textural Appeal
21
Native corn starchGelled
Native waxy maizeCohesive
Traditional modified starch
Industry standard
Functional native starchDESIRABLE
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 22/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion IncorporatedCopyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Applications for Functional NativeStarches
• Baby foods
• Bakery fillings, creams and cooking creams
• Cultured dairy
• Chilled ready meals, soups and sauces
• Frozen ready meals or meal solutions
• Fruit preparations
• Processed meat
• Soups, sauces and dressings
22
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 23/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Example Case Studies
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 24/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 1:
Salad Dressing
24
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 25/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 1: Objective
• To develop a clean label version of apourable creamy salad dressingformulation
• Challenges for clean label dressingsand sauces:
– Textural stability (viscosity)over shelf life
– Microbial stability over shelf life
– Sensory (flavor, texture)
25
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 26/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Clean Label Ranch Dressing – Key Formulation Challenges
• Formulation challenge #1: texturizer (starch-based)
– Ingredient typically used: modified corn starch (instant)
– Function:
• Provides thick, heavy-bodied texture
• Maintains viscosity over required shelf life• Prevents syneresis/separation
– Alternative: NOVATION® 5300 functional native starch (instant)
• Formulation challenge #2: antioxidant/chelating agent
– Ingredient typically used: ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)
– Function:
• Prevents oxidation/rancidity (off color, flavor)
– Alternatives (antioxidants): rosemary & green tea extract
26
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 27/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Clean Label Ranch Dressing – Key Formulation Challenges
• Formulation challenge #3: preservative
– Ingredient typically used: potassium sorbate
– Function:
• Prevents bacteria, yeast, mold growth
– Alternative: cultured dextrose• Formulation challenge #4: flavor enhancer
– Ingredient typically used: monosodium glutamate
– Function:
• Enhances ranch flavor, salt perception
– Alternative: natural flavor enhancer
27
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 28/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion IncorporatedCopyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated 28
Salad Dressing Formulation
Ingredients Control Clean label
Oil 41.00% 41.00%
Water 35.99% 34.35%
Buttermilk powder* 7.00% 7.00%
Vinegar (12 % acetic acid) 6.50% 6.50%
Egg yolk (10% salted) 3.63% 3.63%
Sugar 3.11% 3.11%
Salt 1.39% 1.39%
Food starch- modified 0.75%
Garlic powder 0.15% 0.15%
Xanthan Gum 0.15% 0.15%
Black pepper 0.10% 0.10%
MSG 0.10%
Onion powder (fine) 0.07% 0.07%
Potassium Sorbate 0.05%
EDTA 0.01%
NOVATION® 5300 Starch 1.00%
Flavour enhancer 0.75%
Antioxidant 0.10%
Preservative 0.70%
Total 100.00% 100.00%
INGREDIENTS: soybean oil, water,buttermilk, vinegar, egg yolks, sugar,salt, modified food starch, xanthangum, garlic powder, pepper, MSG,onion powder, potassium sorbate,EDTA.
INGREDIENTS: soybean oil, water,buttermilk, vinegar, egg yolks, sugar,salt, corn starch, xanthan gum, naturalflavor enhancer, cultured dextrose,garlic powder, pepper, rosemaryextract, onion powder.
Control Clean Label
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 29/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Salad Dressing Formulation Ingredient Listing
29
INGREDIENTS: soybean oil, water, buttermilk, vinegar, egg
yolks, sugar, salt, modified food starch, xanthan gum, garlicpowder, pepper, MSG, onion powder, potassium sorbate, EDTA.
INGREDIENTS: soybean oil, water, buttermilk, vinegar, eggyolks, sugar, salt, corn starch, xanthan gum, natural flavor
enhancer , cultured dextrose, garlic powder, pepper, rosemary
extract, onion powder.
Control
Clean Label
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 30/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Comparison of Control vs. Clean Label Samples
• Attributes tested:
– Texture
– Flavor
– Color
– Texture stability (6 months) – Flavor stability (6 months)
– Color stability (6 months)
– Microbial stability (6months)
• All attributes were similaror identical for control andclean label
30
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 31/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Analysis: Microscopy
Control Functional Native Starch
31
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 32/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Descriptive Sensory Analysis of TextureControl vs. Clean Label Salad Dressing
32
Comparable Texture
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 33/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 1: Conclusions
• NOVATION 5300 functional native starch can be used to provide texture and stability comparable to modified food starch
• Rosemary and green tea extracts canbe used to replace the functionality of EDTA
in the current formulation• Cultured dextrose –based product can
be used to replace the functionality ofpotassium sorbate in this formulation
• The natural flavor enhancer used is effective
in mimicking the flavor enhancement role ofMSG
The combination of ingredients above can be used toproduce a clean label pourable creamy salad dressing
33
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 34/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 2:
Greek Yogurt
34
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 35/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Wholesome Greek Yogurt, Made on aConventional Stirred Yogurt Production Line
35
Objective
• Develop a clean label yogurt produce on a conventional yogurtline with the texture, eating experience and nutritional profile of astrained Greek-style yogurt.
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 36/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Greek Yogurt—Key Challenges
• Formulation challenge #1: texturizer
– Ingredient typically used: modified starch or hydrocolloids
– Function:
• Prevents syneresis/separation
• Provides desired texture
• Maintains viscosity over required shelf life
– Alternative: NOVATION® Indulge 3320
• Formulation challenge #2: fruit preparation texturizer
– Ingredient typically used: modified starch, hydrocolloids
– Function:• Provides desired texture
• Maintains viscosity over required shelf life
• Prevents syneresis/separation
– Alternative: NOVATION® Prima 300 functional native starch
36
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 37/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Texture
37
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Surface Shine (in Container)
Surface Grain (in Container)
Cracking / Breaking **
Spoon Indentation (in Cup)
Jiggle
Surface Grain (on Spoon)
Firmness (Before Stir)
Viscosity (Stir)
Rate of FlowFirmness (After Stir)
Thickness in the Mouth
Cohesiveness
Evenness of Mouthcoating
Slipperiness
Meltaway
Residual Mouthcoatings
Residual Chalky Mouthcoating
Wholesome prototype
MFS containing prototype
Greek yogurt market leading product
Using existing process, ingredient innovation enables developmentof clean label products with optimized taste and texture
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 38/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Wholesome Greek Yogurt Formulation
Formulation: Wholesome Greek Yogurt WhiteMass, 0% Fat
Skim milk 92.64%
Milk protein concentrate (MPC) 85 4.85%
NOVATION Indulge 3320 2.51%
TOTAL 100.00%
INGREDIENTS: cultured skim milk, milk proteinconcentrate, maltodextrin, tapioca starch
38
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 39/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Fruit Filling Formulation
• Concentration 40 –42° Brix
• Stability tested: – Ambient
– Refrigerated
– Freeze/thaw
*Starch level for modified starch is 4.5%,for functional native starch will be 5%
Ingredient %
Apple Juice 45.77Cherry
Concentrate 14.36Grape Juice 6.68Salt 0.19
Starch* 4.5
Water 8.5
Granulated Sugar 20
Total 100.00
39
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 40/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Weeks
S c o r e
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Weeks
S c o r e
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Weeks
S c o r e
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Weeks
S c o r e
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Cycles
S c o r e
0
3
6
9
12
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Number of Cycles
S c o r e
MFS
FunctionalNative
Ambient Refrigerated Freeze/thaw
Fruit Filling Stability Evaluation
• Scores below 9 are acceptable; 0 is best
• Stability tested for 18 weeks (ambient or refrigerated) or 18cycles (freeze/thaw)
• NOVATION Prima 300 functional native starch showedstability, texture and flavor comparable to modified food starch
40
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 41/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 2: Conclusions
• NOVATION Indulge 3320 starch canbe used to provide texture and stabilitycomparable to modified food starch
• Formulated Greek-style yogurtsmade with clean label starches have
the texture and eating experience ofcommercial benchmark
• NOVATION Prima 300 functional nativestarch is an effective and functionaltexturizer for natural fruit preparations
• Functional native starches offer ambient,refrigerated and freeze/thaw stabilitycomparable to modified food starches
• Functional native starches maintaindesirable texture and flavor
41
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 42/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Case Study 3:
Blueberry Muffins
42
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 43/51
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 44/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Blueberry Muffin—Key FormulationChallenges
• Formulation challenge #1: flour
– Ingredient typically used: bleached flour
– Function: base texture
– Alternative: unbleached flour
• Formulation challenge #2: fat
– Ingredient typically used: shorteningpowder (partially hydrogenated soybean oil)
– Function: source of fat—texture, flavor,nutrition
– Alternative: palm oil powder
• Formulation challenge #3: leavening
– Ingredient typically used: sodiumaluminum phosphate
– Function: provide leavened air-cell structure
– Alternative: baking soda andmonocalcium phosphate
• Formulation challenge #4: texturizer
– Ingredient typically used:
INSTANT PURE-FLO® F (modifiedcorn starch)
– Function: provide leavened air-cellstructure
– Alternative: NOVATION® 4600(corn starch)
• Formulation challenge #5: flavor
– Ingredient typically used: naturaland artificial blueberry flavors
– Function: provide pleasant flavor
– Alternative: natural blueberry flavor
44
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 45/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Formulation
• Muffins are prepared by mixing dry mix with milk,vegetable oil, eggs and blueberries
• The same amount of milk, vegetable oil, eggs and blueberriesand the same baking condition are used for both formulas
45
Control Clean LabelIngredient True % Ingredient True %
All-purpose bleached flour 47.93 All-purpose unbleached flour 49.59
Extra fine sugar 32.56 Extra fine sugar 33.06
Shortening powder 7.76 Corn syrup solid 6.61
Corn syrup solid 6.61 Palm oil powder 5.50
INSTANT PURE-FLO F 1.80 NOVATION 4600 2.00
Baking soda 1.20 Baking soda 1.20
Monocalcium phosphate 0.70 Monocalcium phosphate 1.20
Sodium aluminum phosphate 0.60 Salt 0.55
Salt 0.55 Natural blueberry flavor 0.17
Natural and artificial blueberry flavor 0.17 Xanthan gum 0.12
Xanthan gum 0.12 Total 100.00
Total 100.00
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 46/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Ingredient Statement and Nutritional Panel
46
Clean Label
Ingredients: enriched flour bleached (wheat flour,niacin, iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folicacid), sugar, corn syrup, partially hydrogenatedsoybean oil, modified corn starch, nonfat milk,leavening (baking soda, monocalcium phosphate,sodium aluminum phosphate), salt, mono- anddiglycerides, natural and artificial flavor, xanthangum.
Ingredients: wheat flour, sugar, corn syrup, palm oil,corn starch, leavening (baking soda, monocalciumphosphate), salt, natural flavor, xanthan gum.
Control
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 47/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion IncorporatedCopyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Comparable Textureand Flavor
• Similar crust and crumb color, shape,symmetry, openness of crumb,hardness and adhesiveness to palate
• Control muffin has higher mouthcoating (1 point higher) and bakedflavor note (1 point higher)
• Clean label muffin has highercohesiveness (2 points higher),moisture absorption (1 point higher),sweetness (1 point higher) andblueberry flavor note (1 point higher)
Each attribute is evaluated on 15-point scale.
Clean LabelControl
47
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 48/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
Summary and Recommendations
• NOVATION functional native starches are an effective and easy-to-useingredient option in developing clean label formulations
• Many additional ingredient options are available today to develop cleanlabel or ―all-natural‖ formulations
• Food formulating know-how as well as the ability to evaluate texture,
flavor and stability are important tools to ensure success
• In-depth understanding of the mechanisms of instability and the functionof formulation options can provide valuable insight and success
48
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 49/51
Copyright © 2012 Ingredion IncorporatedCopyright © 2012 Ingredion Incorporated
www.cleanlabelinsights.com
• Clean label consumer trends and insights
• Clean label case studies and applicationsadvice
• Clean label events and news
• Critical regulatory facts and updates
• Formulation expertise
• Pioneering clean label starch ingredients
49
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 50/51
Formulating Clean Label Foods: Opportunities and Challenges
8/12/2019 Why Clean Label Webinar
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/why-clean-label-webinar 51/51
Visit foodproductdesign.com to register for future events and to view
Thank you for attending today’s Webinar sponsored by: