why are we reviewing the evidence on hpv immunization of

15
Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of adolescent girls & what are the questions for SAGE today? Prof Claire-Anne Siegrist SAGE Member 1

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization

of adolescent girls &

what are the questions for SAGE today?

Prof Claire-Anne Siegrist

SAGE Member

1

Page 2: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Estimated cervical cancer incidence worldwide

Data Source: International Agency for Research on

Cancer

2012: 528,000 new cases 266,000 deaths due to cervical cancer. > 85 % of cervical cancer deaths are in developing countries

Page 3: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Bases for the introduction of HPV vaccines

Two available vaccines : bivalent (bHPV, Cervarix®) and quadrivalent (qHPV, GARDASIL®).

Both are prepared from purified L1 protein, the major capsid protein, and contain HPV VLPs adjuvanted on aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate (qHPV) or AS04 (bHPV).

3

Page 4: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Bases for the introduction of HPV vaccines

• Both licensed based upon the demonstration of clinical efficacy against CIN2-3 lesions in young adult women (16-25 years) ↔ assumed efficacy against cervical cancer.

• Mechanism of protection: assumed to be neutralizing antibody-mediated (supported by animal models in which

passive transfer of hyperimmune serum from donors immunized with L1 VLPs is protective).

• The age-based license extension for adolescent girls, in whom efficacy trials would not be feasible, was granted through “immunological bridging”.

4

Page 5: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

5

Anti-HPV6 GMTs by Age at Vaccination (Gardasil®) Immunogenicity Bridge

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Age (Years)

500

700

900

1100

1300 1500 1600

Seru

m G

MT

wit

h 9

5%

CI,

mM

U/m

L

Efficacy Program

Merck, unpublished data, ACIP presentation by Eliav Barr, February 2006

Bases for the introduction of HPV vaccines

• Phase III immunogenicity study (qHPV) in male and female adolescents and young adult women (Block SL, Pediatrics 2006)

• Non-inferiority of antibody titers ↔ 1.7 – 2.7 times higher in adolescents elicited by the same 3 dose (0-2-6 months) schedule

Page 6: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

SAGE April 2014 6 |

0 1,700 3,400850 Kilometers

The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on

this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on

the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal

status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or

concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted

lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there

may not yet be full agreement.

WHO 2014. All rights reserved

Countries with HPV immunization in the national immunization programme; and planned introductions, 2014

Data Source: WHO/IVB Database, as at 23 January

2014

Map production: Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals,

(IVB), World Health Organization

Date of slide: 24 January 2014

Not Available, Not Introduced /No

Plans (142 countries or 73%)

Not applicable

Introduced* to date (52 countries or 27%)

* Includes partial introduction

More than 50 countries

Yet few developing

countries (3)

Page 7: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Main challenge for HPV immunization

WANTED: increased implementation and increased coverage !

7

FIGURE. Estimated vaccination coverage with selected vaccines and doses among adolescents aged 13–17 years, by survey year — National Immunization Survey–Teen, United States, 2006–2012 MMWR August 30, 2013 / 62(34);685-693

1 dose

3 doses

Page 8: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Today's Questions

May the HPV immunization schedule for adolescent girls be reduced from 3 to 2 doses ?

If yes, with which schedule ?

If yes: does this apply to both qHPV and bHPV vaccines ?

8

cost savings reduced vaccine and delivery costs

simpler logistics increased flexibility of the intervals

annual doses easier for school-based delivery

Page 9: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Protection: assumed as only antibody-mediated

Protective threshold undefined - markedly below (100x ?) detection levels of current assays (no failure despite apparent “Ab loss”)

Correlates of protection against HPV

Page 10: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Vaccine-induced antibodies • much higher (10 – 100x) • of higher “potency” than infection-induced antibodies

Protection is expected as similar if antibodies are non inferior (titers, neutralizing capacity / avidity)

(Scherpenisse M, Plos One 2013)

Correlates of protection against HPV

Page 11: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Duration of protection ↔ duration of antibody persistence

• long-lived plasma cells ↔ Ab plateau (12 mo) ↔ slow decay ↔ slow waning

Immunological correlates of long term protection:

• First 1(-2) dose(s): generate memory cells to trigger their affinity maturation

• Last dose (≥ 6 mo): reactivate memory cells to differentiate into plasma cells

Duration of protection against HPV

Prime Prime Boost

Page 12: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Duration of protection ↔ duration of antibody persistence

• long-lived plasma cells ↔ Ab plateau (12 mo) ↔ slow decay ↔ slow waning

Immunological correlates of long term protection:

• First 1(-2) dose(s): generate memory cells to trigger their affinity maturation ↔ 100% adol. primed after 1 dose

• Last dose (≥ 6 mo): reactivate memory cells to differentiate into plasma cells ↔ 2x higher peak titers in adolescents ↔ antibody plateau ↔ slow decline

Duration of protection against HPV

Prime Prime Boost

Page 13: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

PROCESS

Ad hoc Expert Consultation

Review of evidence

Review background document

Report to SAGE

Page 14: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

HPV Vaccine Schedules Ad-hoc Expert Consultation

• Andrew Hall, UK

• Julia Brotherton, Australia

• Maddalena D'Addario, Swizterland

• Simon Dobson, Canada

• Dorota Gertig, Australia

• Vladimir Gilca, Canada

• Mark Jit, UK

• Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Mexico

• Amy Leval, Sweden

• Lauri Markowitz, USA

• Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan, France

• Chantal Sauvageau, Canada

• John Schiller, USA

• Claire-Anne Siegrist, Swizterland

• Margaret Stanley, USA

14

Industry representatives Attila Mihayi Alfred Saah WHO Secretariat Paul Bloem Philippe Duclos Tracy Goodman Sami Gottlieb Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo Olivier Lapujade Drew Meek Ximena Riveros Susan Wang

Page 15: Why are we reviewing the evidence on HPV immunization of

Today's Questions May the HPV immunization schedule for adolescent girls be reduced from 3 to 2 doses ?

If yes, with which schedule ?

If yes: does this apply to both qHPV and bHPV vaccines ? 15

Are antibody responses after 2 adolescent doses non inferior to 3 doses in women (efficacy demonstrated) and/or adolescents

• peak titers

• plateau “immunological bridging”

• prime – prime (0 – 2 months) • prime – bost (0 - ≥ 6 months)