whot-qcd collaborationwhot-qcd collaboration1 格子qcdによるqgp物質の性質の解明...
TRANSCRIPT
1
格子QCDによるQGP物質の性質の解明
ポリヤコフ・ループの虚部相関によるポリヤコフ・ループの虚部相関によるデバイ遮蔽質量の解析デバイ遮蔽質量の解析
前沢祐前沢祐 (東京大学)(東京大学)
in collaboration within collaboration with
青木慎也、金谷和至、梅田貴士青木慎也、金谷和至、梅田貴士 (筑波大物理)(筑波大物理)
石井理修、浮田尚哉石井理修、浮田尚哉 (筑波大計算セ)(筑波大計算セ)
初田哲男初田哲男 (東京大学)(東京大学)江尻信司江尻信司 ((BNLBNL))
WHOT-QCD CollaborationWHOT-QCD Collaboration
熱場の量子論とその応用熱場の量子論とその応用 @ @ 基研基研, Sep. 5, Sep. 5--7, 20077, 2007
2
Definition of Debye screening mass
In QED
In QCD (gauge fixing)
Polyakov loop correlation
?
)(4 nUtStatic
charged Polyakov loop:quark
3
True Debye mass?
4A4A
Dm ~One gluonexchange
two gluonexchange
0→grmrm DM ee −− >
4A4A
4A4A+
4A4A 4A
~4A4A A
r
+ ~
rmDe 2−
Tgm
gTm
M
D2~
~
mM becomes dominant at r → ∞
4
Exclution of magnetic gluonArnold and Yaffe, PRD 52 (1995) 7208
TC or TE reflection
Operator O which is odd under TE reflection
O( gT ) screening
for example, ○
×
under TE reflection:
Debye mass can be obtained fromIm-Im correlation of Polyakov loop.
5
Imaginary correlation for color singlet channel
Separation of Q-Q correlation after Coulomb gauge fixing
Q-Q correlation:
Color-singlet correlation:
Real and Imaginary part of Polyakov loop
TE reflection:
Im-Im correlation for color-singlet channel
6
In perturbation theory (weak coupling limit)
~Re-Re and Im-Im correlations
~2~ g
Comparison with “potential” (normalized free energy)
WHOT-QCD Coll. PRD 75 (2007) 074501
7
Numerical SimulationsTwo-flavor full QCD simulationTwo-flavor full QCD simulation
Lattice size:
Action: RG-improved gauge action + Clover improved Wilson quark action
Quark mass & Temperature (Line of constant physics)
# of Configurations: 500-600 confs. (5000-6000 traj.)by Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm
Lattice spacing (a) near Tc
41633 ×=× ts NN
points) (12 points) (13
cc
cc
TTTmmTTTmm
0.30.1:80.0/0.40.1:65.0/
~
~
==
==
ρπ
ρπ
fm 25.0~ ,/1 aaNT t=
7
8
Numerical SimulationsColor-singlet correlation
65.0/2.3=
=
ρπ mmTT c
9
Results of screening mass
5.182.0 ≤≤ rTFit range
65.0/ =ρπ mm 80.0/ =ρπ mm
There is little discrepancy between V(r) and CIm(r) for mD
Contribution of magnetic gluon is small.
10
Results of screening massmM becomes dominant at r → ∞ TgmgTm MD
2~,~
Fit range dependencerTR ≤ini5.182.0 ≤≤ rT
65.0/2.4=
=
ρπ mmTT c
80.0/0.3=
=
ρπ mmTT c
iniR iniR
potential ≠ Im-Im correlation?
large statistics are necessary
11
SummaryPolyakov loop correlation
include contribution of magnetic screening mass
Due to TE reflection, A contribution are excludedArnold and Yaffe, PRD 52 (1995) 7208
For color-singlet correlation after Coulomb gauge fixing,
Comparison of mD between potential and Im-Im correlation on lattice
There is no obvious discrepancy.
Contribution of magnetic screening mass is littleat the r and/or T .
Large volumeand/or high T Contribution of magnetic gluon?
12
Effective running coupling
Comparison between V(r) and C(r)
)( ∞→T
13
Effective running coupling
Comparison between V(r) and C(r)
65.0/ =ρπ mm 80.0/ =ρπ mm
CVL αα ~2 ×
14
Comparison with thermal perturbation theory
2-loop running coupling
2
0
1
2
02 lnlnln)( ⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
Λ+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
Λ=−
−SMSM
Tg µββµβloop2
MeV 2612 ≈Λ =fNSM
TTT πππµ 3,2,=
πα
4~)(
2Im gT
65.0/ =ρπ mm 80.0/ =ρπ mm
π3
π
)(4
)(2
Im Tg
T Vp απ
α << −loo2