who decides: how participatory grantmaking benefits donors, communities and movements
DESCRIPTION
Participatory Grantmaking emerges from a practice of grassroots activism, with assumed belief that decision-making participation of people impacted by the fund’s programs will guarantee that grants are allocated to those most deserving. Participatory Grantmaking models have proliferated over the past several decades. Yet there has been little research or documentation to analyze the assumptions and outcomes of the methodology.The Lafayette Practice conducted research and interviews to analyze and compare the practices of eight premiere international Participatory Grantmaking Funds (PGF). TLP examined existing qualitative and quantitative data regarding the funds and their grantees, including functions, roles, and budgets.The funds included in this report are:Disability Rights FundFRIDA – Young Feminist FundGMT InitiativeHIV Young Leaders FundInternational Treatment Preparedness Coalition (ITPC) HIV Collaborative FundRed Umbrella FundRobert Carr Networks FundUHAI – the East African Sexual Health and Rights Initiative.The 2014 “Who Decides” report was sponsored by the Levi Strauss Foundation“Who Decides: How Participatory Grantmaking Benefits Donors, Communities and Movements” by Matthew Hart is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.TRANSCRIPT
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
-
41
-
42
-
43