white and pharoah-chapter 5

113
chapter 5 Film Imaging

Upload: zohre-rafi

Post on 12-Apr-2017

110 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

chapter 5Film Imaging

Page 2: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

X-RAY FILM

Page 3: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

COMPOSITION• (1) emulsion and • (2) base

Page 4: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Emulsion• The two principal components of • 1)silver halide grains,

• which are sensitive to x radiation and visible light • composed primarily of

crystals of silver bromide

Page 5: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

•are flat, tabular crystals •are oriented parallel with

the film surface to offer a large cross-sectional area to the x-ray beam

Page 6: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• • INSIGHT film has about twice the number of silver grains so that it requires only half the exposure of Ultra-speed film.

Page 7: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• 2)matrix »in which the crystals are suspended. »absorbs processing solutions, allowing the chemicals to reach

and react with the silver halide grains .

Page 8: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

overcoatAn additional layer of vehicle is added to the film emulsion

helps protect the film from damage by scratching, contamination , or pressure from rollers when an automatic processor

Page 9: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Base• function:

» support the emulsion. • Composition:

» polyester polyethylene terephthalate

•provides the proper degree of flexibility

•withstand exposure to processing solutions without becoming distorted

•uniformly translucent and casts no pattern on the resultant radiograph

Page 10: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

INTRAORAL X-RAY FILM

Page 11: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

dot• One corner of each dental film has a

small, raised dot that is used for film orientation.

Page 12: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• After the film has been exposed and processed, the dot is used to orient the patient’s right and left side images properly.

Page 13: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

lead foil• A thin lead foil backing with an

embossed pattern is between the wrappers in the film packet.

• It shields the film from backscatter (secondary) radiation, which fogs the film and reduces subject contrast (image quality).

Page 14: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• It also reduces patient exposure by absorbing some of the residual x-ray beam.

• Most importantly, if the film packet is placed backward in the patient’s mouth so that the tube side of the film is facing away from the x-ray machine, the lead foil will be positioned between the subject and the film.

Page 15: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• In this circumstance, most of the radiation is absorbed by the lead foil, and the resulting radiograph is light and shows the embossed pattern in the lead foil

Page 16: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Periapical View• are used to record the crowns, roots,

and surrounding bone. • three sizes: • (1) size 0 for small children • (2) size 1, which is relatively narrow

and used for views of the anterior teeth

• (3) size 2, the standard film size used for adults

Page 17: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

  various sizes of Dental x-ray film

Page 18: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Bitewing View

Page 19: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Bitewings are useful for detecting interproximal caries and evaluating the height of alveolar bone.

• Size 2 film is normally used in adults; the smaller size 1 is preferred in children. In small children, size 0 may be used. A relatively long size 3 is also available.

Page 20: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Occlusal View• Occlusal film, size 4, is more than

three times larger than size 2

Page 21: white and pharoah-Chapter 5
Page 22: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• It is used to• 1) show larger areas of the maxilla or

mandible than may be seen on a periapical film.

• 2) obtain right-angle views to the usual periapical view.

Page 23: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

SCREEN FILM• film is used with intensifying screens

to reduce patient exposure• The intensifying screens absorb x

rays and emit visible light, which exposes the film.

• film. It is designed to be sensitive to visible light b

Page 24: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Crystal type: tabular-shaped (flat) grains of silver halide to capture the image. flat surfaces facing the radiation source, providing a larger cross section (target) and resulting in increased speed without loss of sharpness.

Page 25: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

INTENSIFYING SCREENS

Page 26: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

FUNCTION• The presence of intensifying screens

creates an image receptor system that is 10 to 60 times more sensitive to x rays than the film alone.

• are used with films for extraoral radiography, including panoramic, Cephalometric, and skull projections.

Page 27: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• are not used intraorally with periapical or occlusal films

• because their use would reduce the resolution of the resulting image below that necessary for diagnosis of much dental disease.

Page 28: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• resolving power of screens is related to their speed:

• the slower the speed of a screen, the greater its resolving power, and vice versa.

Page 29: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

COMPOSITION

Page 30: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

1) Base

Page 31: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

2 )Phosphor Layer

Page 32: white and pharoah-Chapter 5
Page 33: white and pharoah-Chapter 5
Page 34: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

3 )Protective Coat

Page 35: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

FORMATION OF THE LATENT IMAGE

• Before exposure, film emulsion consists of photosensitive crystals containing primarily silver bromide

Page 36: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• When the silver halide crystals are irradiated, x-ray photons release electrons from the bromide ions

Page 37: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• The negatively charged sensitivity site

• attracts positively charged free interstitial silver ions

Page 38: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• When a silver ion reaches the negatively charged sensitivity site, it is reduced and forms a neutral atom of metallic silver

Page 39: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

PROCESSING SOLUTIONS• Film processing involves the following

procedures:• 1. Immerse exposed film in

developer.• 2. Rinse developer off film in water

bath.• 3. Immerse film in fixer.• 4. Wash film in water bath to remove

fixer.

Page 40: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

DEVELOPING SOLUTION• Before exposure, many silver 

bromide crystals (gray) are present  in  the emulsion.

Page 41: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

•  After exposure,  the exposed crystals 

• containing neutral silver atoms at latent image sites (orange dots within some crystals) constitute the latent image. 

Page 42: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

•  The developer converts the exposed crystals containing neutral silver atoms at the latent image sites into solid grains of metallic silver (black).  

Page 43: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• The fixer dissolves the unexposed, undeveloped silver bromide crystals, leaving only the solid silver grains that form the radiographic image.

Page 44: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

DEVELOPING SOLUTION• The developing solution contains four

components, all dissolved in water: (1) developer, (2) activator, (3) preservative, and (4) restrainer.

Page 45: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Developer

Page 46: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

ActivatorHydroquinone

provides an electron to reduce the oxidized phenidone back to its original active state so that it can continue to reduce silver halide grains to metallic silver.

Page 47: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Preservative• phenidone and hydroquinone• Phenidone the first electron donor converts silver ions to metallic silver

Page 48: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

DEVELOPER REPLENISHER• 8 ounces of fresh developer

(replenisher) per gallon of developing solution.

• This assumes the development of an average of 30 periapical or 5 panoramic films per day

Page 49: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

RINSING• the films are rinsed in water for 30

seconds

• Rinsing dilutes the developer, slowing the development process. It also removes the alkali activator, preventing neutralization of the acid fixer.

Page 50: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

FIXING SOLUTION• fixer has removed the unexposed

silver bromide crystals.

• Fixer also hardens and shrinks the film emulsion.

• As with developer, fixer should be replenished daily at the rate of 8 ounces per gallon.

Page 51: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Fixing solution also contains four components, all dissolved in water:

• (1) clearing agent, (2) acidifier, (3) preservative, and (4) hardener.

Page 52: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Clearing Agent• ammonium thiosulfate (“hypo”) • dissolves the unexposed silver halide

grains. • Excessive fixation (hours) results in a

gradual loss of film density because the grains of silver slowly dissolve in the acetic acid of the fixing solution.

Page 53: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Acidifier• contains an acetic acid buffer

system (pH 4 to 4.5) to keep the fixer pH constant.

• The acidic pH is required to promote good diffusion of thiosulfate into the emulsion and of silver thiosulfate complex out of the emulsion. The a

Page 54: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Preservative• Ammonium sulfite is the preservative

in the fixing solution, as it is in the developer.

• It prevents oxidation of the thiosulfate clearing agent, which is unstable in the acid environment of the fixing solution.

Page 55: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Hardener usually aluminum sulfatecomplexes with the gelatin during fixing and prevents damage to the gelatin during subsequent handling. This reduction of swelling lessens mechanical damage to the emulsion and shortens drying time.

Page 56: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

WASHING• to remove all thiosulfate ions and

silver thiosulfate complexes. • Any silver compound or thiosulfate

that remains because of improper washing discolors and causes stains, which are most apparent in the radiopaque (light) areas.

Page 57: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

IMAGE CHARACTERISTICS

Page 58: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

1 -RADIOGRAPHIC DENSITY• The degree of darkening or opacity of

an exposed film is referred to as optical density.

• The optical density of an area of an x-ray film can be measured as follows:

Page 59: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

characteristic curve

Page 60: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

characteristic curve• A plot of the relationship between film

optical density and exposure• As exposure of the film increases, its

optical density increases.• A film is of greatest diagnostic value

when the structures of interest are imaged on the relatively straight portion of the graph, between 0.6 and 3.0 optical density units.

Page 61: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

base plus fog• An unexposed film, when processed,

shows some density. This appearance is caused by the inherent density of the base and added tint and the development of a few unexposed silver halide crystals.

• typically is 0.2 to 0.3.

Page 62: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

a- Exposure• Increasing the milliamperage (mA),

peak kilovoltage (kVp), or exposure time increases the number of photons reaching the film and thus increases the density of the radiograph. Reducing the distance between the focal spot and film also increases film density.

Page 63: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

b- Subject Thickness• The thicker the subject, the more the

beam is attenuated, and the lighter the resultant image.

• If exposure factors intended for adults are used on children or edentulous patients, the resultant films are dark because a smaller amount of absorbing tissue is in

• the path of the x-ray beam. The dentist should vary exposure time

Page 64: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Aluminum step wedge .

Page 65: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

c- Subject Density• The greater the density of a structure

within the subject, the greater the attenuation of the x-ray beam directed through that subject or area

• radiopaque object• radiolucent object.

Page 66: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

2- RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST• the range of densities on a

radiograph.

• An image that shows both light areas and dark areas has high contrast; this also is referred to as a short gray scale of contrast because few shades

Page 67: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

low contrast high contrast

Page 68: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

a-subject contrast• Subject contrast is the range of

characteristics of the subject that influences radiographic contrast.

• It is influenced largely by the subject’s thickness, density, and atomic number. The subject con-

Page 69: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

The energy of the x-ray beam, selected by the kVp, influences image contrast.

Page 70: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Changing the time or mA of the exposure (and holding the kVp constant) also influences subject contrast. If the film is excessively light or dark, contrast of anatomic structures is diminished.

Page 71: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

b- film contrast• Film contrast describes the inherent

capacity of radiographic films to display differences in subject contrast—that is, variations in the intensity of the remnant beam.

• A high-contrast film reveals areas of small difference in subject contrast more clearly than a low-contrast film.

Page 72: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Film contrast usually is measured as the average slope of the diagnostically useful portion of the characteristic curve.

Page 73: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

C) scattered radiation• results from photons that have

interacted with the subject by Compton or coherent interactions.

• This scattered radiation causes fogging of a radiograph—an overall darkening of the image—and results in loss of radiographic contrast.

Page 74: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• In most dental applications, • the best means of reducing scattered

radiation are to use a relatively • low kVp and to collimate the beam to

the size of the film to • prevent scatter from an area outside

the region of the image.

Page 75: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

3- RADIOGRAPHIC SPEED• Radiographic speed refers to the

amount of radiation required to produce an image of a standard density.

• Film speed frequently is expressed as the reciprocal of the exposure (in roentgens) required to produce an optical density of 1 above base plus fog

Page 76: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• A fast film requires a relatively low exposure to produce a density of 1, whereas a slower film requires a longer exposure for the processed film to have the same density.

• Film speed is controlled largely by

the size of the silver halide grains and their silver content.

Page 77: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Characteristic curves for two films demonstrating greater inherent latitude of film B compared with film A.

Page 78: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

4- FILM LATITUDE• Film latitude is a measure of the

range of exposures that can be recorded as distinguishable densities on a film.

• A film optimized to display wide latitude can record a subject with a wide range of subject contrast.

Page 79: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

A film with a characteristic curve that has a long straight-line portion and a shallow slope has wide latitude

Page 80: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

5- RADIOGRAPHIC NOISE• On intraoral dental film, mottle may

be seen as film graininess, which is caused by the visibility of silver grains in the film emulsion, especially when magnification is used to examine an image. Film graininess is most evident when high-temperature processing is used.

Page 81: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Radiographic mottle is also evident when the film is used with fast intensifying screens.

• Two important causes of the phenomenon are quantum mottle and screen structure mottle.

Page 82: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Quantum mottle is caused by a fluctuation in the number of photons per unit of the beam cross-sectional area absorbed by the intensifying screen.

• Screen structure mottle is graininess caused by screen phosphors.

• Quantum mottle and screen structure mottle are each most evident when fast film-screen combinations are used.

Page 83: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

6- RADIOGRAPHIC SHARPNESS AND RESOLUTION• Sharpness is the ability of a

radiograph to define an edge precisely(e.g., the dentin-enamel junction, or a thin trabecular plate).

• Resolution, or resolving power, is the ability of a radiograph to record separate structures that are close together.

Page 84: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• The groups of lines and spaces are arranged in the test target in order of increasing numbers of lines and spaces per millimeter.

Page 85: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

a) Image Receptor Blurring• With intraoral dental x-ray film, the

size and number of the silver grains in the film emulsion determines image sharpness:

• the finer the grain size, the finer the sharpness.

• In general, slow-speed films have fine grains, and faster films have larger grains.

Page 86: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Use of intensifying screens in extraoral radiography has an adverse effect on image sharpness. The spreading light causes a blurring of fine detail on the radiograph.

Intensifying screens with large crystals are relatively fast, but image sharpness is diminished.

Page 87: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• The presence of an image on each side of a double-emulsion film also causes a loss of image sharpness through parallax.

• When intensifying screens are used, parallax distortion contributes to image unsharpness because light from one screen may cross the film base and reach the emulsion on the opposite side.

Page 88: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

Parallax unsharpness  results when double-emulsion film  is used

Page 89: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

b) Motion Blurring• Image sharpness also can be lost

through movement of the film, subject, or x-ray source during exposure.

• Movement of the x-ray source in effect enlarges the focal spot and diminishes image sharpness. Patient movement can be minimized by stabilizing the

Page 90: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

c) Geometric Blurring• The larger the focal spot, the greater

the loss of image sharpness.

• Image sharpness is improved by increasing the distance between the focal spot and the object and reducing the distance between the object and the image receptor.

Page 91: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

7- IMAGE QUALITY• It combines the features of density,

contrast, latitude, sharpness, resolution, and perhaps other parameters.

• Often a system can be optimized for one of these parameters, but this usually is achieved at the expense of others.

Page 92: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

COMMON CAUSES OF FAULTY RADIOGRAPHS

Page 93: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

LIGHT RADIOGRAPHS

Page 94: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Processing Errors• Underdevelopment (temperature too low; 

time too short; thermometer inaccurate)• Depleted developer solution• Diluted or contaminated developer• Excessive fixation• Underexposure• Insufficient mA• Insufficient kVp• Insufficient time• Film-source distance too great• Film packet reversed in mouth 

Page 95: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

DARK RADIOGRAPHS

Page 96: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Processing Errors• Overdevelopment (temperature too 

high; time too long)• Developer concentration too high• Inadequate time in fixer• Accidental exposure to light• Improper safelighting• Storage of films without shielding, at 

too high a temperature, or past expiration date

Page 97: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Overexposure• Excessive mA• Excessive kVp• Excessive time• Film-source distance too short

Page 98: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

INSUFFICIENT CONTRAST

Page 99: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Underdevelopment• Underexposure• Excessive kVp• Excessive film fog

Page 100: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

FILM FOG

Page 101: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Improper safelighting (improper filter; excessive bulb wattage; inadequate distance between safelight and work surface; prolonged exposure to safelight)

• Light leaks (cracked safelight filter; light from doors, vents, or other sources)

• Overdevelopment• Contaminated solutions• Deteriorated film (stored at high 

temperature; stored at high humidity; exposed to radiation; outdated)

Page 102: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

DARK SPOTS OR LINES

Page 103: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Fingerprint contamination• Protective wrapping paper sticking to film 

surface• Film in contact with tank or another film 

during fixation• Film contaminated with developer before 

processing• Excessive bending of film• Static discharge to film before processing• Excessive roller pressure during automatic 

processing• Dirty rollers in automatic processing

Page 104: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

LIGHT SPOTS

Page 105: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Film contaminated with fixer before processing

• Film in contact with tank or another film during development

• Excessive bending of film

Page 106: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

YELLOW OR BROWN STAINS

Page 107: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Depleted developer• Depleted fixer• Insufficient washing• Contaminated solutions

Page 108: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

BLURRING

Page 109: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Movement of patient• Movement of x-ray tube head• Double exposure

Page 110: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

PARTIAL IMAGES

Page 111: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

• Top of film not immersed in developing solution

• Misalignment of x-ray tube head (“cone cut”)

Page 112: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

EMULSION PEEL• Abrasion of image during 

processing• Excessive time in wash water

Page 113: white and pharoah-Chapter 5

thanks