whistleblower mitchell asks disqualifications teknosis application for disqualifications 28 usc...
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
TeknosisKNOWLEDGE AS-A-WHOLE
A B O U T
Email Me
Taking action for andin Liberty each andevery day. Pleaseconsider supporting afree, open press as wellas extensional lines ofcommunication andsharing. Teknosis'continued operationgreatly depends onyour donation, joiningor purchase of itemsadvertised here. Thankyou!
+++++++++++++++++ Pay forwardw/PayPal +++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++ We accept Bitcoins++++++++++++++++++
H I G H Q U A L I T Y I O D I N E
S U P P L E M E N T -
« Federal Corruption Case Moves Forward As Media Fails To Investigate/Report | Main | PaulAndrew Mitchell (political prisoner in the USA) letter writing campaign »
APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containingAFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL aswell as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill et al. & NOTICE OFERRORS re: Harris & Harris, P.C.) - from Paul Andrew MitchellUSMCFP/Springfield
10/27/2014: Newest updates have been added and are to be found here and at the bottom ofthis post: Sample Letter to United States District Judge, Honorable Douglas M. Harpool (if everit was time for anyone to take action it is here [as this goes towards all of our human, civil aswell as natural rights] as well as helping raise the funds for the attorney Paul needs to proceedin his Que Tam lawsuits,.), communications to Senator Barrasso's office, House Committee onGovernment Oversight and Reform, as well as further information from Paul, political prisoner#1 in the USA. Also, I wonder if these fraudulent and criminal public officials perpetrating thison Paul have ever heard of elder abuse (his DOB: 6-21-48). Let's see, we have various publicofficials [a goodly portion of whom can not produce their credentials- therefore they shouldn'teven be getting paid because they aren't even a public official, they are just parading aroundas if they are] from various states and the District of Columbia, causing an elderly person to beimprisoned. They tortured him by illegally detaining him, putting him in solitary confinement,refused him a speedy trial or a trial by jury, kept him incarcerated and moved him to otherdetention facilties in various states (diesel therapy which causes him to lose his handwrittenlegal papers he is making in his defense, by confiscation), then sent him off to the UnitedStates Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, saying he is incompetent (when he actually has aphotographic memory and knows a whole lot about very important aspects of the history of theUnited States, its government, Constitution and laws). On top of that on his first day inUSMCFP/Springfield, MO they threaten him immediately with putting him on brain damagingand life-threatening psychotropic drugs in violation of Supreme Court rulings (U.S. v. Sell)!
___
From: MODELESKI MITCHELL PAUL (44202086)Sent Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:34 AMTo: [email protected]: FAIR WARNING/ACTUAL NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST
INMATE REQUEST TO STAFFU.S. DOJ/BOPTO: Staff Psychologists / PsychiatristDATE: 9/26/2014FROM: Modeleski, M.P. (given name)*REG. NO.: 44202-086UNIT: 10-GWORK ASSIGNMENT: (n/a)FAIR WARNING / ACTUAL NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESISTTO: Whom It May ConcernThreatening a federal witness is a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513(a), (c),(e), and (f). Statements made by USMCFP staff psychologists to me to dateimply a probable threat, and specific intent to cause serious brain damages,and to impair my ability to testify and otherwise prepare and participatein my own defense, and in the defense of certain named Co-Defendants.These Co-Defendants have a Fundamental Right to compel my unimpaired testimonyas a key defense witness. I have expressly reserved my Right to proceedIn Propria Persona i.e. "personally" under 28 U.S.C. 1654. FORMAL DEMAND IS HEREBYMADE OF YOU TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM ANY AND ALL THREATS OR ATTEMPTSTO "FORCEFULLY MEDICATE" ME AGAINST MY EXPRESSED DESIRE THAT YOU NOT DO SO.ALL SUCH MEDICATIONS VIOLATE MY RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS. Cf. "pharmakeia"(sorcery, witchcraft) in the Revelation (last Book of the New Testament).Respectfully,
C E L E B R I T Y S H I N D I G -
Y O U N G E V I T Y
S I M P L E , E A S Y , D E T O X
- B O D Y C L E A N S E
S T A R T E R K I T - L E A R N
M O R E
G E T A N D S T A Y F I T
W I T H B E Y O N D T A N G Y
T A N G E R I N E !
O R G A N I C A L O E V E R A
J U I C E - 1 8 X
C O N C E N T R A T E -
L E A R N M O R E
R E C E N T P O S T S
Paul Andrew Mitchell (politicalprisoner in the USA) letter writingcampaign
APPLICATION FORDISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144(containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS ANDPREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
D E T O X I D I N E - L E A R N
M O R E
D E A D D O C T O R S D O N ' T
L I E R A D I O P O D C A S T &
S T O R E , S E E B U S I N E S S
O P P O R T U N I T Y T A B T O
G E T Y O U R S
B R E A T H E E A S Y -
H I M A L A Y A N C R Y S T A L
S A L T I N H A L E R -
L E A R N M O R E
H O W Y O U N G E V I T Y
W O R K S
N A T U R A L H E L P F O R
M O O D S W I N G S -
L I T H I U M O R O T A T E -
L E A R N M O R E
/s/ Paul Andrew MitchellPaul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)*Qualified Federal Witness, 18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513* Doe v. Dunning, 549 P.2d 1All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
___
Notes:
Paul must pay-per-minute to use the email system there andthe only way to print is at $0.15 per page on the laser printer.
It will probably happen that he will need to hire a licensed
attorney to prosecute his "Qui Tam" false claim actionsat USDC/WDMO/Southern Division/Springfield, Missouri:
Courts have ruled that such cases cannot be prosecuted "Pro Se"hence one of the REMEDIES REQUESTED is the appointment of aCJA lawyer to represent the United States ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell.(CJA = Criminal Justice Act).
See case law under 31 USC 3729 et seq.
Thus an initial goal of $10,000 to retain a capable law firm to go the distance.
Contact Larry Saccato <[email protected]>
Also, the INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OFQUO WARRANTO AND HABEAS CORPUS is no secret:
Paul invites as many as possible to apply for leaveto appear Amicus Curiae and/or write support lettersto Judge Harpool.
Paul is doing his final thinking on a MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENTjudicially declaring the "not self-executing" Declaration UNconstitutional in theSenate's ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights("ICCPR"):
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/treaty/ (see "Reservations")
Then see "not self-executing" in the Declarations.
See also Paul's recent NOTICE OF INTENT to Justice Scalia:that Declaration violates the Petition Clause,per Thomas v. Collins etc.
... and brilliant dissents in the Igartua cases, 1st Circuite.g. Judges Howard and Torruella:
Senate cannot create domestic legislation in "uncameral" mode: such legislation requiresapproval by the House of Representatives too: 1 USC 101:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.html
Treaties are also supreme Law, and they can ONLY be ratified "under the authority of the United States".
See 6:2, 3:2:1, 28 USC 1331 and 28 USC 2241(c)(3)(all cite Constitution, laws and treaties).
If you have the contacts who might help send this info. to them.Also there is the possibility of Wyoming Liberty Law Group?
as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS:USA v. Hill et al. & NOTICE OFERRORS re: Harris & Harris, P.C.) -from Paul Andrew MitchellUSMCFP/Springfield
Federal Corruption Case MovesForward As Media Fails ToInvestigate/Report
Hidden Government Group LinkingJFK Assassination, Watergate, Iran-Contra And 9/11
Jackie Kennedy believed LyndonJohnson killed JFK
Oscar Pistorius Guilty: Verdict -Culpable Homicide in ReevaSteenkamp Murder
Re Lawless Judges and the Doctrineof Unauthorized Deprivation: ScottPractice of Law and Status
NOTICE OF DEFAULT -Communication of Paul AndrewMitchell from 9/12/14 at MedicalCenter for Federal [Political]Prisoners re: Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 226 Filed 10/10/14
Gnosis 284 - Tablet of Union
Milk kefir and suero are simplywonderful and kefir with BeyondTangy Tangerine Citrus Peach Fusion2.0 added is even better
A R C H I V E S
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
Subscribe to this blog's feed
++++++++++++++++++
E S S E N T I A L A N T I -O X I D A N T P R O P E R T I E S
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
B I O M E T I C S
I M O R T A L I U M I S H E R E
Y O U N G E V I T Y B T T 2 . 0
+ H E A L T H Y S T A R T
P A K S 2 . 0
C O F F E E S F R O M
Y O U N G E V I T Y
___
Sample letter United States District Judge, Honorable Douglas M. Harpool:
Hon. Douglas M. HarpoolUnited States District Judgec/o Clerk of Court, USDC/WDMO/Southern Division222 N. John Q. Hammons Parkway, Room 1400Springfield 65806-2515Missouri, USA
Dear Judge Harpool,
I am writing with sincere concern for the plight of political prisonerPaul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., now detained at USMCFP inSpringfield, Missouri, under highly suspicious circumstances.
On good authority we are now told that the Federal District Courtin Cheyenne, Wyoming, never perfected jurisdiction in personam,chiefly because of missing -and- defective credentials e.g. Oaths of Officefor Nancy D. Freudenthal and Stephan Harris, among several others.
Consequently, it appears your Court now has jurisdiction in personam,by virtue of U.S. ex rel. Mitchell v. Freudenthal et al., as mailed toyour Clerk of Court on October 9, 2014, from the USMCFP Mail Room.See, for example, 31 U.S.C. 3730(h) (relief from retaliatory actions).
We are also extremely interested to learn recently that Paul now intendsto challenge the "not self-executing" Declaration in the U.S. Senate'sratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ("ICCPR")for violating the Petition Clause in the First Amendment (read "the Right conservative of all other rights"). On the Internet, please see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/treaty/
A favorable ruling by your Court on that challenge has the real potentialto open flood gates of valuable and beneficial human rights litigation --not only in America, but in other States Party to that important Treaty.
America needs and deserves a private right of action to enforce the ICCPRi.e. effective judicial remedies for violations of our Fundamental Rightsnotwithstanding that the violations were committed by persons actingin some official capacity.
Such a wise precedent may also begin to reverse the steady decline we observe in the reputation of the Federal Judiciary across the board.
Please reply with the correct Docket number, so that we may filecorrespondence in support of the REMEDIES REQUESTED by Paul'sINITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS e.g. Amicus Curiae Briefs,"Qui Tam" Joinders, etc.
Thank you for your time and attention, Judge Harpool.
p.s. We do not need any repeats of Dr. Sell's ordeal!See Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990).
Sincerely yours,
- Z I N C O R O T A T E -L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
T H E T A S T Y W A Y T OI M P R O V E Y O U R D I E T !- O R G A N I C G O J IB E R R I E S - L E A R NM O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H EB E N E F I T S -H I M A L A Y A N C R Y S T A LS A L T - L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H EB E N E F I T S -H I M A L A Y A N C R Y S T A LS A L T - C O U R S EG R A N U L A T E D - L E A R NM O R E
++++++++++++++++++
F O R R A D I A N T S K I N -A Q U A S P I R I T - L E A R NM O R E
++++++++++++++++++
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Y O U N G E V I T Y B E T H E
C H A N G E
Y O U N G E V I T Y H E A L T H Y
C H O C O L A T E
G O F O O D S Y O U N G E V I T Y
J O I N O R C R E A T E A
R O N P A U L M E E T U P , .
R O N P A U L F O R U M S
W E T H E P E O P L E
R A D I O N E T W O R K
A R C H I V E
___
All on one line, to facilitate copying and pasting:
[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
i.e.
"Amnesty International" <[email protected]>
"Cato" <[email protected]>
Families Against Mandatory Minimums:"FAMM" <[email protected]>
"Heritage Foundation" <[email protected]>
"Sentencing Project" <[email protected]>
At this moment, we need to emphasize the ABSENCE OF JURISDICTION IN PERSONAMat the USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming, and the PRESENCE OF JURISDICTION IN PERSONAMat the USDC in Springfield, Missouri.
APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144is a good starter, to avoid overloading prospectswith too much reading.
THANKS!
In His Holy Name,
/s/ Paul
___
I will be gathering all the various states where Paul has been and put the information to theabuse hotlines, etc. on this page. Right now Nancy D. Freudenthal of Wyoming is the principalin this - elder abuser #1,. Note: I will link back to whomever gives this coverage.
MO: Adult Abuse and Neglect Hotline: 1-800-392-0210 [Elder Abuse- It is a Crime. Make adifference. Make the call. Paul is located in the system via: Modeleski, M. P. (given name) | #44202-086 | Medical Center for Federal Prisoners | Springfield, Missouri 65801-4000]
National Adult Protective Services Association: 217-523-4431
Update! Via Cryptome http://cryptome.org
2014-00742 Whistleblower Mitchell Asks Disqualifications October
24, 2014
If you care about your country and justice, you will spread this like wildfire to all of yourcontacts, newsgroups, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Paul could use some help. Here is the latest info re: sending funds to Paul's commisary account[money order or postal money order]:
Federal Bureau of PrisonsMITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI
D I S C O V E R T H E P O W E RO F I N F R A R E D H E A T -F A R I N F R A R E D S A U N A- O N E P E R S O N U N I T -L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H E P O W E RO F I N F R A R E D H E A T -F A R I N F R A R E D S A U N A- T W O P E R S O N U N I T -L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H E P O W E RO F I N F R A R E D H E A T -F A R I N F R A R E D S A U N A- F O U R P E R S O N U N I T- L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H E P O W E RO F I N F R A R E D H E A T -F A R I N F R A R E D S A U N A- C O R N E R U N I T -L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
D I S C O V E R T H E P O W E RO F I N F R A R E D H E A T -F A R I N F R A R E D S A U N A- O P P O S I T E F A C I N G
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
A P F N M E S S A G E B O A R D
L E O E M I L W A N T A /
W A N T A G A T E L I N K S
44202086Post Office Box 474701Des Moines, Iowa 50947-0001
___
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: 444202086
TO: Brown, Thomas; Saccato, Larry
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS [1 of 2]
DATE: 10/03/2014 10:20:28 AM
Docket No. 2:14-CR-00027-NDF
TO:
U.S. District Court
2120 Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
Cheyenne 82001
Wyoming, USA
Subject: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144
Greetings Your Honor:
Comes now Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (“Mitchell”), to apply for
mandatory disqualifications of Nancy D. Freudenthal and possibly also
Scott W. Skavdahl and Alan B. Johnson from the instant criminal case,
pursuant to 28 USC 144, for good causes showing as follows:
AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE
Notably, at the hearing on 3/21/2014, Ms. Freudenthal clearly
attempted to characterize Mitchell’s ongoing credential
investigation as some sort of pathological obsession
(or similar words to that same effect).
Mitchell promptly objected by emphasizing that the credential
investigation was being performed on behalf of private clients
who paid fair professional fees for that service.
U N I T - L E A R N M O R E
++++++++++++++++++
^v^v^v^v^v^^v^
B E C O M E AB I T B I L L I O N S C O -F O U N D E R T O D A Y !
Free David R Hinkson,political pri…
more info petition is now closed
start a petition
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
The credential investigation has also been actively assisted by
Federal officers in DOJ’s Office of Information Policy (“OIP”) and
the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (“EOUSA”) in Washington, D.C.,
with actual knowledge of Deputy U.S. Marshals in San Diego, Spokane
and Seattle.
Such official assistance consisted mainly of timely and untimely
replies and production of partial documents responsive to
Mitchell’s numerous Requests, properly submitted under the
Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 USC 552, in addition to
in-person meetings with Deputy U.S. Marshals in San Diego and Seattle.
To date, Mitchell has had five (5) in-person meetings with
one or more Deputy U.S. Marshals stationed in Seattle, and two (2)
in-person meetings with Deputy U.S. Marshals stationed in San Diego.
Near the conclusion of the 3/21/2014 hearing, Freudenthal
actually apologized to Mitchell for her attempt to characterize
the credential investigation, and its cumulative results to date,
as the obsession of someone suffering from a mental illness
of some kind.
Mitchell continues to regard that attempt as defamatory,
and defamation violates two (2) Human Rights Treaties –
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 2 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (See VCC5 infra.)
Then, without Mitchell’s actual knowledge, Mr. L. Robert Murray
dba Assistant U.S. Attorney, commenced to file a “secret motion”
-- ex parte -- for a second psychological evaluation of Mitchell at FDC/SeaTac.
That ex parte motion was never timely served upon Mitchell; no notice of any
hearing on that ex parte motion was ever served upon Mitchell; and, no
hearing on that ex parte motion was ever conducted at which Mitchell
was allowed to appear. (See Code of Conduct, Canon 3(A)(4) infra.)
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Mitchell has always proceeded In Propria Persona i.e. “personally”
under 28 USC 1654, notwithstanding any and all appearances
to the contrary.
In point of fact, Mr. Mark Hardee as initial “standby counsel” failed
completely to forward or even to mention said ex parte motion to Mitchell;
and, Docket records were erroneously modified – by person(s) unknown –
so as to list Mr. Hardee as Mitchell’s formal legal “representative”,
directly contradicting Mitchell’s decision to proceed always
In Propria Persona.
Freudenthal summarily “granted” said ex parte motion, but
Mitchell was not allowed to see any “order” granting that ex parte motion
until after he arrived at FDC/SeaTac for a second period of detention
and more solitary confinement.
In point of fact, Hardee also failed completely to forward or even
to mention to Mitchell said “order” granting that ex parte motion.
Mitchell has also confirmed a Federal law which prohibits Federal Judges
from engaging in the practice of law, and defines that violation as a
high misdemeanor (See 28 USC 454.)
All psychological interviews of Mitchell by one Cynthia A. Low,
dba Forensic Psychologist, were conducted at FDC/SeaTac at all times
without the assistance of Counsel present during those interviews, and
over Mitchell’s multiple written objections to the total absence of Counsel,
and to all missing credentials for one Stephan Harris whose name
appeared in the conforming stamp displayed on Freudenthal’s “order”.
Relying upon information provided by the U.S. Supreme Court in
Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468 (1938), Mitchell believes
the complete absence of counsel during all of Low’s interviews
resulted in ousting this Court of jurisdiction (cf. “jurisdictional bar”,
“court no longer has jurisdiction to proceed”).
Mitchell has never competently and never intelligently waived his
Fundamental right to meaningful technical assistance of “standby” counsel.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Here, Mitchell relies upon U.S. v. Coupez, 603 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1979)
(re: “meaningful technical assistance”), and upon similar case law
under 28 USC 1654. Near the end of the 3/21/2014 hearing,
Mitchell expressly reserved his Right to change his mind about
formal legal representation, and Freudenthal acknowledged same
on the record.
Mitchell has previously filed a DEMAND FOR RECUSAL which expanded
substantially upon the several reasons why he believes Freudenthal’s bias
and prejudice do warrant her immediate disqualification.
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 3 of 1
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Said DEMAND FOR RECUSAL is hereby incorporated by reference, as if set forth
fully here.
(See Docket records for the particulars of that DEMAND FOR RECUSAL.)
Chiefly, while being detained unlawfully in Gering, Nebraska,
Mitchell submitted a proper FOIA Request to OIP for the four (4)
credentials required of Freudenthal, Skavdahl and Johnson.
All three (3) of said Court personnel turned up with missing and/or
defective credentials: OIP produced no SENATE CONFIRMATIONS
or OATH OF OFFICE for Johnson. (See 28 U.S.C. 453 and
5 USC 2104, 2902, 2903, 3331, 3332, 3333, 5507.)
Also, on information Mitchell concluded the APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
for Freudenthal and Skavdahl were visibly counterfeit forms; and, the
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS for Freudenthal and Skavdahl were incomplete
because of the visibly counterfeit APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS executed by
one Eric Holder, Jr., formerly dba U.S. Attorney General. (See 44 USC 3512.)
Mitchell has confirmed that the Federal statute at 5 USC 2902(c) requires
the U.S. Attorney General to countersign all PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS
of judicial officers e.g. district judges, also U.S. attorneys and U.S. marshals.
Mitchell has also diligently studied the Appointments Clause and
the Recess Appointments Clause in the U.S. Constitution.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
He concluded therefrom that a SENATE CONFIRMATION is absolutely
required of Freudenthal, Skavdahl and Johnson: the absence of that
key mandatory credential also invalidates any and all other credentials,
such as the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION, APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
and OATH OFFICE, chiefly because the SENATE CONFIRMATION
cannot be bypassed or circumvented indefinitely.
Even for recess appointments under Article II, Section 2,
Clause 3 in the U.S. Constitution (“2:2:3”), Mitchell found case law
holding that the U.S. Senate’s formal advice and consent must follow
during the next ensuing Senate session. Here, Mitchell relies upon
the decision in Noel Canning v. NLRB, 705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
Prior to his FOIA Request for her four (4) credentials, Mitchell
did mail to Freudenthal a proper DEMAND for disclosing a copy
of her APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS. A copy of that DEMAND should
be filed in this Court’s Docket records. Freudenthal never answered
that DEMAND (see further discussion of “demand” infra).
Mitchell also believes Freudenthal suffers from a severe
conflict of interest that results from her failure to exercise
adequate administrative supervision of Court subordinates
such as Stephan Harris, Zachary Fisher and Tammy Hilliker dba
Clerk and Deputy Clerks of Court, respectively (to name a few).
(See Code of Conduct, Canon 3(B) infra.) Here, Mitchell believes
probable cause exists for application of the theory of vicarious
liability aka “respondeat superior” in Latin (let superiors answer
for the misconduct of their subordinates).
All three of the latter personnel of this Court have either failed or refused
to produce their APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by 5 USC 3331 et seq.,
and their OATH OF OFFICE required by 28 USC 951 (duties),
after receiving Mitchell’s proper DEMANDs for disclosure of same.
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 4 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
In this context, after finding it Mitchell has been relying upon a statement
in 63C AmJur 2d, to wit: “The public have a right to demand that public officials
perform all of their duties faithfully.”
Also, by studying the FOIA, Mitchell confirmed the Federal law at
5 USC 551(1)(B) presently exempts the entire Judicial Branch
from the Freedom of Information Act, thus necessitating a
DEMAND instead of a proper FOIA Request for disclosure of
credentials required of this Court’s inferior officers
i.e. magistrates, clerks and deputy clerks.
Mitchell has now formerly charged Stephan Harris with concealing
Court records in violation of 18 USC 1519 (a Federal felony).
(See the Court Docket for that “VCC” infra, and in pari materia
compare 18 USC 2071 where it mentions “custody” of court records.)
The Court is the legal custodian of all APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS of
all Court officers, designated as such by the Federal law at 5 USC 2906
(“the court to which the office pertains”), NOT the Administrative Office
of the U.S. Courts in Washington, D.C.
Mitchell sincerely believes the instant case can and should be correctly
and promptly dismissed as a direct consequence of the well documented
failure by Stephan Harris to produce 2 required credentials; without both
credentials, neither he nor any of his subordinates can lawfully sign, or seal,
any “subpoenas” issued by the Court. See 28 USCS 1691 and 28 USCA 1691
for extensive case law upon which Mitchell has often relied during the period
in question.
Mitchell concluded that delegation of authority by Stephen Harris is
legally impossible, as long as he cannot or will not produce proof of
all credentials required of all Clerks of Court and all Deputy Clerks of Court by
applicable Federal statutes and Constitutional provisions. (See 6:3, U.S. Const.)
Mitchell has also concluded that the Paperwork Reduction Act effectively
created a “right to inspect” all U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for the required display
of a valid OMB control number at the upper right-hand corner of page one.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Mitchell therefore believes the net effects of all these missing
and defective credentials is a clear and painfully obvious violation
of FRCrP Rule 2, at a minimum, in addition to many far-reaching
violations of criminal statutes dutifully cited in Mitchell’s several
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTs, ON INFORMATION (“VCC”),
as now filed in the Court’s official Docket records in the instant case.
For the record, Rule 2 currently reads: “Interpretation. These rules
are to be interpreted to provide for the just determination of every
criminal proceeding, to secure simplicity in procedure and fairness
in administration, and to eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay.
(As amended April 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002.)”
On information found in the Federal court decision in U.S. v. Gregory,
508 F.Supp. 1218 (USDC/SDAL 1980), Mitchell also relies now upon
the following abstract of that decision, to wit: “Pursuant to Rule 2,
party who objects to Court’s ruling on motion to recuse should be
able to obtain review of that ruling before being put to burden and
expense of lengthy trial.”
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 5 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, Mitchell has also lodged four (4) separate “Qui Tam” Complaints
under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) at 31 USC 3729 et seq. Each contained
a PROOF OF SERVICE identifying recipients of hard copy originals
transmitted by Mitchell via U.S. Mail.
Mitchell has also studied case law under the FCA which properly classifies
qui tam relators as “agents of the United States” (see United States
ex. Rel. Madden v. General Dynamics Corp., 4 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1993)).
As such, Mitchell believes that he is thereby entitled to all authorized
awards and all protections afforded to all FCA “whistleblowers”
(see 31 USC 3730(h), expressly authorizing relief from retaliation
against “agents” for efforts to stop false claims against the Treasury
of the United States.)
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Mitchell also relies consistently upon the statute at 5 USC 5507
(a Federal officer cannot get paid before executing a valid 5 USC 3332
affidavit).
[continue at 2 of 2]
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 6 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: 44202086
TO: Brown, Thomas; Saccato, Larry
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS [2 of 2]
DATE: 10/03/2014 10:20:51 AM
[continued from 1 of 2]
On further information and belief, Mitchell has studied the Code of Conduct
for United States Judges, and thereby inferred probable demonstrable
violations of Canons 2(A), 3(A)(4), 3(B)(1) and 3(B)(2) from all facts, laws
and court decisions mentioned heretofore.
On information found in the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case
of U.S. v. Mason, 412 U.S. 391 (1973), Mitchell also relies upon the following
text in that decision, to wit: “If the doctrine of stare decisis has any meaning
at all, it requires that people in their everyday affairs be able to rely upon
our [U.S. Supreme Court] decisions and not be needlessly penalized for such
reliance.”
On information found in the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case
of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), Mitchell also relies upon the
following principle established in that historic decision, to wit:
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be
no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
On all information discussed heretofore, Mitchell sincerely believes that
sufficient probable cause already exists to justify the conclusion that
Freudenthal lacks even minimal authority to determine the legal
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
sufficiency of this AFFIDAVIT under 28 USC 144.
This concludes Mitchell’s AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE.
INCORPORATION OF ATTACHMENTS
Mitchell hereby incorporates by reference two Attachments:
“NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill et al. (dated 9/20/2014)” and
“NOTICE OF ERRORS by Harris & Harris, P.C. (dated 10/1/2014)”
as if both were set forth fully here.
VERIFICATION / CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris, hereby verify
under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States
of America, without the “United States” (Federal government),
that the instant APPLICATION is made in good faith, and
the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct,
according to the best of my current information, knowledge
and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 USC 1746(1).
See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties
of the United States are all the supreme Law of the Land).
Dated: 10/1/2014
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell [Signed Paul Mitchell]
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 7 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 USC 1964,
Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
(objectives of Civil RICO);
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator,
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
False Claims Act: 31 USC 3729 et seq. (4X)
* See Doe v. Dunning, 549 P.2d 1
(Washington State Supreme Court)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
Attachments: NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill et al. (dated 9/20/2014)
NOTICE OF ERRORS by Harris & Harris, P.C. (dated 10/1/2014)
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 8 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: 44202086
TO: Brown, Thomas; Guenette, Edward; Mullen, Jack; Saccato, Larry
SUBJECT: Notice to Counsels: USA v. Hill et al.
DATE: 09/20/2014 12:08:56 PM
Greetings Ladies and Gentlemen:
I am writing to you for the primary purpose
of making each of you aware of certain laws and
facts which may not, and probably won’t,
come to your attention by any other means.
As you may already know, I have continued
to reserve all Rights (cf. UCC 1-308),
with emphasis on all of my Fundamental Rights,
and to appear In Propria Persona i.e. “personally”
under 28 USC 1654. Cf. “In Propria Persona”
in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition,
particularly where that definition addresses
the issue of Court jurisdiction.
I have now survived two (2) Faretta hearings –
one in Seattle and one in Cheyenne. The hearing
on 3/21/2014 in Cheyenne was noteworthy for
repeated attempts by one Nancy Dell Freudenthal
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
(“NDF”) to change my mind about formal legal
representation: I reserved my right to change my mind,
and I continued to proceed In Propria Persona.
The other noteworthy event at that 3/21/2014
hearing was NDF’s obvious attempt to characterize the
credential investigation as some kind of “pathological
obsession”. A transcript should show that
I opposed her vain attempt, and I actually
succeeded in eliciting a spoken apology from NDF.
For reasons like the latter, I have properly demanded
her immediate recusal, but she stubbornly refuses
to do so.
The case law I have studied requires recusal
even if there is the mere appearance of bias.
I believe that your several clients are, therefore,
now at serious risk of continuing bias and
prejudice by NDF, and by her several accomplices,
in our case(s) -- chiefly Stephan Harris and
L. Robert Murray.
More to the merits of our Fundamental Rights,
DOJ’s Office of Information Policy (“OIP”)
promptly replied to my proper FOIA Request
while I was being detained unlawfully in Gering,
Nebraska. OIP’s timely reply contained a cover
letter, and responsive documents, calling for the
following logical conclusions of law:
(1) no SENATE CONFIRMATION required of NDF by
5 USC 2902(c), and by either 2:2:2 or 2:2:3 in the
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 9 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
U.S. Constitution (Article:Section:Clause);
(2) incomplete PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION also required
of NDF by 5 USC 2902(c), and by either 2:2:2 or 2:2:3,
due in part to defective U.S. OPM Standard Form 61
(“SF-61”) APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for one Eric Holder, Jr.;
see also 44 USC 3512 here;
(3) NDF’s SF-61 is also a counterfeit form because:
(a) it lacks a valid OMB control number at the
upper right-hand corner, as required by 44 USC 3501 et seq.;
(cf. OMB control number 50-R0118 i.e. five zero dash
R zero one one eight);
(b) it lacks the paragraph citing 5 USC 2903
(Authority to administer); and,
(c) the electronic SF-61 published at www.opm.gov
was not reviewed or approved by OMB as required by
5 CFR 1320.5, the Federal Regulation implementing the
Paperwork Reduction Act (“PRA”): again, see 44 USC 3512;
Under the Appointments Clause at 2:2:2, a
SENATE CONFIRMATION must precede the other 3
Credentials required of all U.S. District Judges.
Under the Recess Appointments Clause at 2:2:3, a
SENATE CONFIRMATION must issue during the next
ensuing Senate session i.e. after those other 3
credentials.
Accordingly, I have recently requested the law firm
of Harris & Harris, P.C., to confirm the exact dates
of NDF’s alleged appointment, and of the vacancy
she claimed to fill. To date, Harris & Harris, P.C.,
have not disclosed those exact dates to me.
Nevertheless, it is not likely that she was initially
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
appointed as “Chief Judge”; and, enough time has
now elapsed to compel a conclusion that NDF surely
needed a SENATE CONFIRMATION under one or the
other option: 2:2:2 or 2:2:3. See also the definition
of “officer” at 5 USC 2104, 3332 and 5507.
The legal (and moral) consequences of NDF’s
missing and defective credentials are quite far-
reaching e.g. by necessarily rendering null and void:
(a) all her “orders” and “rulings” to date;
(b) all hearings on which she attempted to preside; and,
(c) the original “arrest warrant” executed upon my
Person on 1/28/2014.
As such, the USDC/DWY lacked jurisdiction in personam
(over my proper Person) ab initio (at least beginning 1/28/2014).
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 10 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, NDF’s attempt to appoint Mr. Terry J. Harris
as my formal legal representative was also void ab initio,
for the very same reasons.
At another hearing on 7/10/2014, I again appeared
under protest and In Propria Persona; and, I gave
at least 2 hours of testimony under direct examination
by Terry J. Harris -- chiefly because no one else was
qualified, or prepared, to conduct such a direct examination
of me.
You should also be informed, via filed Docket records,
that several other Federal personnel have also failed or
refused to disclose their mandatory credentials e.g.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
see RELATOR’S FIFTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
ON INFORMATION (“VCC”), and all other VCCs previously
filed in the Docket records, in timely compliance with 18 USC 4
(misprison of felony).
Notably, Dr. Cynthia A. Low has now failed or refused
to answer my proper FOIA Request for her own SF-61.
My first attempt to address that Request to the
“Disclosure Officer” at FDC/SeaTac was returned
by the U.S. Postal Service with the annotation
“no such addressee” (or words to that effect).
For that reason, I promptly re-mailed that FOIA Request
directly to Dr. Low, but no reply has been forthcoming
from her, nor from any of her superiors nor anyone else
at FDC/SeaTac.
I also wish to take this opportunity to make you
aware that I have now authored approximately
30 CONFIDENTIAL Journal entries consisting of
50+ pages; and, I mailed all of those Journal entries
to Harris & Harris, P.C.
Please accept this communication as my formal
authorization for all defense counsel to obtain
photocopies of all such handwritten Journal entries.
I wrote those Journal entries also to focus
the attention of each defense Counsel on the key
issues (e.g. the heart of the matter), and to prevent
invasions of my privacy Rights that would otherwise
result from what are often described as “fishing
expeditions” -- assembling enormous quantities
of questionable and irrelevant data, at great and
unnecessary expense to government treasuries
(e.g. 20,000 pages and still counting).
Kindly allow me briefly to demonstrate to you why
it is not appropriate or necessary to label my case
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
as “complex”: Stephan Harris has refused to
produce any valid credentials, in blatant violation
of 18 USC 1519 (a felony). Therefore, he could
not have signed or sealed any subpoena(s) issued
by any Federal grand jury(s); he could not have
selected or summoned any Federal grand jury(s); and,
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 11 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
he could not have delegated any authority(s) to any
subordinate deputy clerk(s) whatsoever.
See my essay “Clerks or Jerks? The Pivotal Duties
of Federal Court Clerks” for further pertinent details.
In my professional opinion, any and all efforts to
expand the scope of my case beyond those simple
issues is a direct and blatant violation of FRCrP Rule 2;
and, those efforts also constitute probable cause that
barratry has already occurred, and continues to occur
even as I write this.
(Barratry is an offense similar to “churning” by a
stock broker i.e. for purposes of maximizing fee
generation; “Esquire” is an office under the
Crown of England. Cf. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856).)
If any of you need further clarification of any points
made above, please consult the relevant Docket entries
first, then reply via email to my trusted legal assistant
[email protected] who will forward your terse
reply(s) to me at his earliest convenience
(no email attachments, please).
Thank you for your professional consideration.
Sincerely yours, [signed Paul Mitchell]
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 USC 1964,
Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
(objectives of Civil RICO);
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator,
False Claims Act: 31 USC 3729 et seq. (4X)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
Copies forwarded to:
Gay Woodhouse
1912 Capitol Avenue, Suite 500
Cheyenne 82001
Wyoming, USA
Thomas A. Fleener
Fleener & Vang, LCC
P.O. Box 1186
Laramie 82073
Wyoming, USA
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 12 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: 44202086
TO: Brown, Thomas; Guenette, Edward; Mullen, Jack; Saccato, Larry
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF ERRORS by Harris & Harris, P.C.
DATE: 10/01/2014 04:54:51 PM
TO:
Hon. Warden
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
USMCFP
P.O. Box 4000
Springfield 65801-4000
Missouri, USA
RE: August 6, 2014 letter from Terry J. Harris
Greetings Hon. Warden:
Please allow me to explain to you, and to all your subordinates
who may have a need to know, several serious errors that are
evident in the written correspondence you recently received
from Harris & Harris, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming.
On the first page of his cover letter to you dated August 6, 2014,
Mr. Terry J. Harris makes the following serious errors in the
first paragraph:
* “I represent Paul Mitchell” [NOT correct]
* “Nancy Freudenthal’s Order appointing me” [NOT correct]
* “her more recent Order declaring Paul Mitchell incompetent” [NOT correct]
As admitted in their written reply to my proper Request under the
Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), DOJ’s Office of Information Policy
(“OIP”) did not find any SENATE CONFIRMATION in their appointment file
for Nancy Dell Freudenthal.
Moreover, her U.S. Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”)
Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS (“SF-61”)
are a counterfeit form because:
(a) no OMB control number is displayed at the upper right-hand corner;
(b) there is no paragraph citing 5 USC 2903 (Authority to administer); and,
(c) the electronic form at www.opm.gov was never reviewed or approved
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”).
Also, Freudenthal’s PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION is incomplete because
of the counterfeit SF-61 executed by one Eric Holder, Jr. Here, see
5 USC 2902(c), which mandates the Attorney General’s signature
on all such PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS.
OIP’s cover letter and responsive documents were mailed by me
to the P.O. Box of Harris & Harris, P.C. in Cheyenne, Wyoming,
while I was unlawfully detained at a county jail in Gering, Nebraska.
I also requested OIP to forward to that P.O. Box OIP’s timely
reply to my proper FOIA Appeal.
Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF Document 227 Filed 10/14/14 Page 13 of 15
TRULINCS 44202086 - MODELESKI, MITCHELL PAUL - Unit: SPG-G-P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freudenthal’s missing -and- defective credentials do violate at least
two Clauses in the U.S. Constitution (cf. 6:3, and either 2:2:2 or 2:2:3),
and a distinct group of other Federal laws which implement those Clauses.
As such, Ms. Freudenthal lacked the required authority to appoint
Mr. Harris legally to represent me; and, she lacked the required authority
to issue any order(s) whatsoever, least of all one that blatantly defames
me for being “incompetent” [sic]. Defamation is criminal.
Contrary to appearances (and pretenses) fostered by Mr. Harris et al.,
he does not and cannot legally “represent” me as long as I continue
to proceed In Propria Persona. I have always appeared In Propria Persona
i.e. “personally”, which is my right under 28 USC 1654.
I have now survived two (2) Faretta hearings, which can be confirmed by
consulting the Court records in Docket #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 (USDC/Cheyenne).
If you still harbor any reasons why you may doubt or question what
I have written above, please feel free to “go to the source” and
contact OIP directly. That Office is also part of the same Department
(“DOJ”) of which you are presently an officer.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
See 5 USC 3331, 3332, 3333, and 5507.
The real reason why I am presently incarcerated at USMCFP/Springfield
is our credential investigation.
If you wish to receive more information about that investigation,
I will be happy to answer your questions as promptly as humanly possible,
given the limited resources and severe restrictions which I am now
compelled to endure in violation of the Constitution, laws and treaties
of the United States.
Here, see the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution
and also the Act of Congress at 28 USC 2241(c)(3) in chief.
Thank you, Warden, for your continuing professional consideration.
Sincerely yours, [signed: Paul Mitchell]
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name)*
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 USC 1964,
Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
(objectives of Civil RICO);
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator,
False Claims Act: 31 USC 3729 et seq. (4X)
* See Doe v. Dunning, 549 P.2d 1 (Washington State Supreme Court)
(fundamental principle and common-law right to change one’s name)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIASAND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR...
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
SHOW ME MORE LIKE APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28
Download Share of 15
Related:
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the US Governmenthttp://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html
___
Further communications to, with and relating to Paul, political prisoner #1 in the USA:
from: Juan Schoch <[email protected]>
date: Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM
subject: Re: Paul Andrew Mitchell | U.S. Gov. (executive and judicial), IRS targeted
individual
mailed-
by: gmail.com
: Important according to our magic sauce.
As per our conversation on the phone, in re: Paul Andrew Mitchell.
Paul Andrew Mitchell, a Citizen of the State of Washington, has been doing a credentialsinvestigation since the year 2000 [Teknosis ed. note 10/25/14: 1996] of U.S. Federal Judgesand other U.S. Government Officials via FOIA and has been documenting this information viahis website of www.supremelaw.org and via various postings on the internet, etc.
On 1/15/14 he was indicted for obstructing a grand jury investigation and detained in the case(PACER info. below):
U.S. District CourtDistrict of Wyoming (Cheyenne)CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cr-00027-NDF-2
PACER advanced search criteria to bring up docket report in re: Mr. Mitchell:
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Case Number: 14-cr-00027
Case title: USA v. Hill et al
Date Filed: 01/15/2014
3 USA v. Hill et al - Paul Andrew Mitchell wydce 2:2014-cr-00027 01/15/2014
Documentation on his supremelaw.org website in re: FOIA credentials investigation that relatesto what is happening before he was indicted is here:
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/
Paul has done extensive studies in the area of Constitutional issues and legal matters and hasrepresented himself In Propria Persona, has not accepted to be represented by anyone but hadidentified U.S. related law via the Constitution and federal law that he could avail himself oftechnical legal assistance while at the same time representing himself but the courts have notgiven him that opportunity and have ignored his representing himself as shown in the Courtdocket records. In that Paul has asserted that the indictment was not legitimate and has shownin the court record why this is the case he has been ignored, illegally incarcerated and notallowed to mount a proper defense by being released from detainment (he has never previouslycommitted any crimes, nor is he a flight risk), has been moved over 42 times between variousstates since January 15, 2014 and has now been silenced by Judge Nancy Freudenthal rulingthat he is to be sent to a federal medical facility for restore him to competency (whatever thatmeans – forced medication, etc. of a sane person who knows the law?) for 4 months after whichtime, a status conference is set for 11/10/14 at 1:30pm. [Teknosis: Now moved to January2015?]
Another whom I am in communication with predicted that this would happen and that they willjust keep doing the same thing to him to keep him permanently silenced. This is unacceptable.Paul is being punished for knowing the Constitution, the law and for asserting his inalienablerights, and has not been availed a speedy trial and has being given diesel therapy. I have beenmaking information from the docket available via the internet via my blog Teknosis(tekgnosis.typepad.com). The last docket entries in which his competency hearing happened,and the judge gave ruling on 7/10/14 have not been typed up yet so that info. would have tobe gleaned from the docket until such time.
It not surprising to me that the U.S. government, federal court system, in collusion with theIRS is doing this to Paul but it is outrageous to anyone who has a conscience. I hold out hopethat something can be done to help Paul to gain his freedom but I will not hold my breath. Mywife believes that there are those in government with a conscience who can put in motionsomething to help Paul therefore this communication. Below find my posts from my blogTeknosis.
Paul is perfectly sane and can be heard in this interview to prove such is the case:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS0CvvVH-yk
Sincerely,
Juan Schoch
Casselberry, FL
407-925-4141
Paul Andrew Mitchell has been bundled away by the USGovernment
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/02/paul-andrew-mitchell-has-been-bundled-away-by-the-us-government.html
...
from: Danielson, Caroline (Barrasso) <[email protected]>
to: Juan Schoch <[email protected]>
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
date: Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:36 PM
subject: RE: Paul Andrew Mitchell | U.S. Gov. (executive and judicial), IRS targeted
individual
mailed-
by: barrasso.senate.gov
signed-by: senate.gov
: Important mainly because of your interaction with messages in the conversation.
Juan,
Thank you for the information. I have just been informed, however, that because you are athird party we will not be able to help Paul in this matter; we would need to hear from Paulhimself due to confidentiality and privacy restrictions. I am sorry for this inconvenience and Ihope that you are able to find help elsewhere.
Regards,
Caroline Danielson
Caroline Danielson
Intern
Office of Senator John Barrasso
P.O. Box 22201
Casper, WY 82602
(307) 261-6413
---
from: Juan Schoch <[email protected]>
to: [email protected],
date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM
subject: Re: Paul Andrew Mitchell | U.S. Gov. (executive and judicial), IRS targeted
individual
mailed-
by: gmail.com
Caroline,
Sorry but torture and continued on-going attempts to torture and/or kill an agent of the United
States (Paul had four Que Tam lawsuits in process before being illegally kidnapped, which
makes him an agent of the United States) is not a third-party affair. You, Senator Barrasso or
an appropriate member of his staff can easily get into contact with Paul, a citizen of the State
of Washington being held political prisoner, illegally detained (no speedy trial, nor trial by jury
afforded him since February), essentially kidnapped, at United States Medical Center For
Federal Prisoners (USMCFP) Springfield, MIssouri.
Consider yourself given notice:
18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felonyhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge
or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Paul confirms what I suspected would happen, that at the federal medical facility where he
was illegally sent, there would be an attempt to administer him drugs in an attempt to damage
his brain and/or kill him.
___
APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND
PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill et al. &
NOTICE OF ERRORS re: Harris & Harris, P.C.) - from Paul Andrew Mitchell USMCFP/Springfield
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-
containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html
___
from: Larry Saccato <[email protected]>
date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:51 AM
subject: From Paul
mailed-by: gmail.com
signed-by: gmail.com
: Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Larry Saccato 1:51 AM (5 hours ago)
to me
Please express my deepest appreciation to Juan
for his support, concern, and activism.
It means a great deal to me.
Juan has my permission to receive a full and
complete copy of my INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS
IN THE NATURE OF QUO WARRANTO AND HABEAS CORPUS
with all Attachments.
You -- Larry Saccato -- of course have my permission to share
a true and complete copy of same with Juan.
Ideally, it should be scanned and merged into a single .pdf file
including all Attachments etc.
Many thanks, again, Larry.
p.s. Harris & Harris, P.C. have all 30 Journal entries
I wrote and mailed to their P.O. Box -- ~50 pages:
all defense Counsels are now authorized to receive copies of same,
but don't be at all surprised if Terry J. Harris refuses
to release any of those Journal entries. One of those
Journal entries goes into detail about the IRS targeting
scandal, Lois Lerner, and the historical connection
to alcohol Prohibition, for starters see:
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/cooper/ ("The Cooper File")
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/luxford/ (see .pdf files)
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm (verified in several Courts)
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Briefly, the Women's Christian Temperance Union was
secretly financed by the petroleum cartel, in order to
perfect a monopoly in automotive fuel; once that monopoly
was in place, Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol
high and dry as the preferred fuel for cars and trucks,
and leaving a Federal police force inside the several States --
to continue extorting money from the American People.
IRS is now what was left over of that Federal Alcohol Administration
after the Eighteenth Amendment was repealed by the
Twenty-First Amendment. See U.S. v. Constantine for
the key decision outlawing that FAA inside the several,
now 50, States of the Union: one must read all the way
to the end to see the result (i.e. read it BACKWARDS :-)
For shocking proof, see 27 CFR 26.11 definitions of
"Revenue Agent", "Secretary" and "Secretary or his delegate":
http://www.supremelaw.org/cfr/27/
Also, Google site: supremelaw.org "used tire international" "secretary of the treasury'
I hope this helps.
/s/ Paul
___
from: Larry Saccato <[email protected]>
to: Juan Schoch <[email protected]>
date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM
subject: More From Paul
mailed-by: gmail.com
signed-by: gmail.com
: Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Larry Saccato 1:53 AM (5 hours ago)
to me
Thanks, Larry: BETTER IDEA -- since this antiquated email system
will NOT allow forwards, it would help if you could forward to Juan
some of the email you have already received from me e.g.
"Clerks or Jerks?", "Blowing Whistles at Hurricanes" and anything
else you think he would like to read.
THE ISSUE, as far as I can tell, is THE CREDENTIAL INVESTIGATION
so you could get him started browsing the SLL for that subset
e.g.
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
etc.
He can see how we applied THE CREDENTIAL INVESTIGATION
in Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/ (cf. all SUBPOENAs)
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aouscourts/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/
See also SUBPOENA to Paul H. O'Neill here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/ (SUBPOENA to Secretary of the Treasury)
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm (I believe)
http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.gif (I believe)
KEY CASE is Commissioner v. Acker:
IRS cannot create a tax liability with a Federal Regulation,
EVEN IF they were a de jure service, bureau, office or
other subdivision of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Case-related files should be here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/spd/
Google site: supremelaw.org "Case against William M. McCool"
Can you confirm this next URL too, please:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm
If that is not the correct URL, please advise, because I predict
that I'm going to need confirmation of the correct URL very soon.
p.s. Juan should also be given all URLs for all four (4) Qui Tam Complaints.
/s/ Paul
___
from: Larry Saccato <[email protected]>
to: Juan Schoch <[email protected]>
date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:00 AM
subject: More info from Paul
mailed-by: gmail.com
signed-by: gmail.com
: Important mainly because of the people in the conversation.
Larry Saccato 2:00 AM (5 hours ago)
to me
Please inform Juan et al. that U.S. DOJ, Office of Information Policy, Washington, D.C.,promptly replied to my FOIA Request for Freudenthal's four (4) credentialswhile I was unlawfully detained at the county jail in Gering, Nebraska.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
OIP did NOT have any SENATE CONFIRMATION for Freudenthal,even though DOJ is the designated legal custodian per 5 USC 2902(c):
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2902.html (c)(U.S. Attorney General must countersign and seal)
Her U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS are acounterfeit form; and, her PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION is alsoincomplete because Eric Holder's APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITSare also a counterfeit form:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/ (see "NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS")(see also admissions by OPM and OMB !!):http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/
I already checked out Holder's SF-61 here:http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/holder/ (counterfeit Standard Form 61 !)
... in addition to several other Cabinet Officers under O'Bummer:http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/
Freudenthal earlier ignored my DEMAND for her SF-61:http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/freudenthal.nancy/ (NAD = PAST DUE and INDEFAULT)
Therefore, Freudenthal's lack of authority directly affects ALLcases on which Terry J. Harris has acted as defense counsele.g. all sentences she imposed were FRAUDULENT ab initio;all "orders" and "rulings" she has signed were FRAUDULENT ab initio;all hearings on which she "presided" need to be vacated ab initio:
http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm
"[All] acts as such are VOID!"
Soooooo, Terry J. Harris has a HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOW ;-(
And, as "Chief Judge" Freudenthal has failed to exercise adequateadministrative supervision of her subordinates in the Clerk's Office:see Code of Conduct for United States Judges, and foldersfor Clerk's Office personnel Stephan Harris, Tammy Hilliker and Zachary Fisher:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/harris/ (I believe)http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/hilliker/ (I believe)http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/fisher/ (I believe)http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/spd/ (Seattle Police Department)
See in particularArticle VI, Clause 3; Article II, Section 2, Clause 2; and,Article II, Section 2, Clause 3, in the U.S. Constitution:
In the Supreme Law Library, try:http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#6:3 (Oath of Office Clause)http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#2:2:2 (Appointments Clause)http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#2:2:3 (Recess Appointments Clause)
An excellent read on 2:2:2 and 2:2:3 is Noel Canning v. NLRB,D.C. Circuit (2013): holding is correct, imho: vacancies must ARISE during a Senate recess.
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Moreover, withOUT a SENATE CONFIRMATION, all othercredentials for Freudenthal are necessarily VOID becausea SENATE CONFIRMATION must either PRECEDE those other 3,or FOLLOW during the next ensuing Senate session (for the specialcase of recess appointments under 2:2:3 -- the Recess AppointmentsClause in the U.S. Constitution).
All of the above are fully documented in my APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144, which should now be filedin Docket #2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 aka 14-CR-27-F (USDC/DWY).
Larry, you also have a hard copy of that APPLICATION FORDISQUALIFICATIONS because it is an ATTACHMENT incorporatedinto my INITIAL APPLICATION FOR WRITS IN THE NATURE OFQUO WARRANTO AND HABEAS CORPUS.
Try PACER for the full Docket listing at USDC/DWY (Cheyenne, Wyoming).
VERY LATEST is that the STATUS CONFERENCE scheduled for 11/10/2014has now been VACATED, but no reason was given (to me):
I strongly suspect that my APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 was the MAIN REASON, most probably because Freudenthal did NOT see it coming(when she should have expected it!)
Finally, 2 defense Counsels have now identified me as a "crucial witness"and "essential witness" for their respective clients. Case now has a totalof six (6) Co-Defendants, thus 6 total defense Counsels.
(You have the full list of defense Counsels and their contact information.)
A NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST has now been served on high-level officers at USMCFP/Springfield, because a "psychologist" here threatened me, verbally and in writing, with FORCED MEDICATION (using psychotropic drugs) as soon as I arrived here.
See Washington v. Harper (U.S. S.Ct.) for shocking discussions of theeffects of these drugs e.g. death, permanent disability, brain damages,uncontrollable muscle spasms, permanently changing brain chemistry etc. etc.
That psychologist told me, my first day here, that Terry J. Harris"agreed" with Dr. Cynthia Low's "diagnosis" but Low has alsofailed to answer my FOIA Request for her credentials!!
/s/ Paul
___
Please forward ASAP to:
<[email protected]><[email protected]>
TO:Senator John Barrassoc/o Caroline Danielson, InternP.O. Box 22201Casper 82602Wyoming, USA
Email: <[email protected]>
Greetings Senator Barrasso:
Caroline Danielson, your Intern, was kind enough to respond via email
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
to Mr. Juan Schoch in Florida concerning my plight as an Americanpolitical prisoner.
I am presently detained at USMCFP in Springfield, Missouri,after forty-nine (49) discrete moves since my false arrest onJanuary 28, 2014 A.D. See 18 USC 1114, 1201, 1513, 1961 et seq.
AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize your good Offices to communicate directly withMr. Larry Saccato, my trusted Legal Assistant, "Next Friend"(under 28 USC 1654), and Interim Trustee of my private estate,until further Notice.
Mr. Saccato can be reached via email to: <[email protected]>or U.S. Mail to: 1224 N.E. Walnut #257, Roseburg 97470, Oregon, USA.
Two (2) summary documents should be particularly informative to youand to your staff, for starters: "Blowing Whistles at Hurricanes"(written by me, using a pen name); and, my APPLICATION FORDISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144, as recently filed in Docket number#2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2 aka 14-CR-27-F (USDC/Cheyenne, Wyoming).
My 2+hours of testimony on July 10, 2014 were given during aclosed door hearing, but a faithful audio recording should be readilyproduced in response to a proper SUBPOENA and/or civil investigativedemand. I was told, indirectly, that Deputy U.S. Marshals presentduring that hearing were very impressed with my testimony.
One of the more sensitive issues I addressed was the ~7 yearsof pro bono work I did for U.S. Coast Guard Investigationsat San Diego Harbor, California (forensic digital photo analysis).I am a published author in computer graphics (Harvard 1977).
If the USDC/DWY Docket is not open to your staff, Larry Saccatoshould be able to forward a few electronic and/or printed hard copiesto your Office(s), without much delay. The APPLICATION FORDISQUALIFICATIONS comes with two (2) Attachments, and I willremind Larry to forward those Attachments as well to Ms. Danielson'semail address.
(The email system here at USMCFP is very primitive and does notallow message forwarding.)
Another original essay is "Clerks of Jerks? The Pivotal Dutiesof Federal Court Clerks," also authored by me while being detainedfor a second "psychological evaluation" [sic] at FDC/SeaTac(Federal Detention Center, Seattle/Tacoma). Almost immediatelyafter arriving at USMCFP/Springfield, I was threatened verbally,and in writing, with "forced medication". Here, see the decision ofthe U.S. Supreme Court in Washington v. Harper re: psychotropic drugs.
Thank you for your professional consideration, Senator Barrasso.
p.s. I will attempt to print and mail a hard copy of this AUTHORIZATIONto you, but USMCFP staff are recently making it more difficult for me to printhard copies: they are refusing to refill the paper tray in the laser printerin our "Ward". Wait! I see Nurse Rached approaching:
Gotta hide my papers :-)
Sincerely yours,/s/ Paul Andrew MitchellPaul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (chosen name) *Private Attorney General, 18 USC 1964,Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549 (2000)(objectives of Civil RICO);Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator,False Claims Act: 31 USC 3729 et seq. (4X);
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Qualified Federal Witness: 18 USC 1512, 1513;Instructor, Inventor and Systems Development Consultant,utility patent pending, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office;Webmaster, Supreme Law Library: www.supremelaw.org
Bio: www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/resume.htm
* See Doe v. Dunning, 549 P.2d 1 (Washington State Supreme Court)(fundamental principle and common-law right to change one's name)
___
MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI (44202086)10/25/2014 2:34:30 PMRE: Lieber code revisited
Resolutions are not Acts of Congress:compare 1 USC 101 and 1 USC 102:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/101.htmlhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/102.html
Resolutions are merely the opinions of lawmakers,but they are NOT Acts of Congress i.e. "Be it enactedby the Senate and the House of Representatives ...."
See also Dyett v. Turner, Utah Supreme Court (1968),also State v. Phillips (also Utah Supreme Court):
27 < 28, always has been, always will be !
"We do NOT make law by force or by fraud."-- Glass v. The Sloop Betsey (U.S. S.Ct.)
The United States has formally declared insolvencyas to obligations allegedly owed to the Federal Reserve Banks:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/
... thus activating the AUTOMATIC STAY expressly authorizedby U.S. bankruptcy laws: see 11 U.S.C. 368 (I think).
/s/ Paul-----Schoch, Juan on 10/25/2014 11:21 AM wrote:
>
The reason why I brought up Lieber code was because of some people starting a movement ofpeaceful inhabitants. They are tying in the Lieber code:
Lieber Code, General Orders No. 100 by Abraham Lincoln (04/24/1863)
___
MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI (44202086)RE: Lieber etc. (,.) debt and debt collection - money creation
$6.9 TRILLION USD + interest is now payable to the Treasury of the United Statesby the State of Israel and their agent, Dov S. Zakheim:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/zakheim/ (see INVOICEs)http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gwbush/vcc.htm (see all Exhibits)
(See Donald Rumsfeld's press conference on 9/10/2001 + 1 = 9/11;should be on www.youtube.com )
Another $1.8 TRILLION USD + interest is now payable to the Treasury of the United Statesby 200,000+ past and present "members" of The State Bar of California:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]
Those "members" can pay their debt of $9 Million each by charging their attorney malpractice insurance underwriters;
if they don't have malpractice insurance, they can pay their debtsout of their private estates -- or go to prison.
HOW MANY $100 MILLION NEW HOSPITALS CAN BE BUILT WITH $8.7 TRILLION USD?
Somewhere in the Supreme Law Library is my proposal to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to implement a full-scale FRN Recall -- by printing United States Notesinstead: piece o' cake.
/s/ Paul-----Schoch, Juan on 10/25/2014 11:36 AM wrote:
>
___
MITCHELL PAUL MODELESKI (44202086)10/25/2014 2:51:50 PMRE: Question of import
June 21, 1948, high noon at Worcester, Commonwealth of Massachusetts,the first day of Summer, longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm(the day on which God's intense burning sun would shine the longest)
Mom said I was late, and hungry too :-)
Worcester is situated where the intellectual originsof the American Revolution were born too -- in that vicinityof New England.
p.s. I've already raised elder abuse in my pleadings.
IRS is terrified they'll get exposed for keeping PMRSin their Delegations of Authority, after PMRS wasrepealed in 1993:
http://www.supremelaw.org/irm/
($25,000 per award and $35,000 to the President through Treasury)
http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/kickback.htm(see results of my FOIA Request: IRS had no records becauseall awards were paid in CASH or in-step upgrades :-)
/s/ Paul-----Schoch, Juan on 10/25/2014 11:51 AM wrote:
>
What is your date of birth, etc. how old are you? Basically I need to know because you areconsidered an elder and I am convinced you are being abused.
Related:
APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 from Paul Andrew MitchellUSMCFP/Springfield http://t.co/G5R9zD5u6N
— CelebrityPaul (@Celebs4Paul) October 23, 2014
More related:
Lawman: IRS: Chuck Conces' Legacy Lives On - Thanks Chuck!http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2008/08/lawman-irs-chuc.html
October 23, 2014 in Current Affairs | Permalink
Teknosis: APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATIONS: 28 USC 144 (containing AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS AND PREJUDICE & DEMAND FOR RECUSAL as well as NOTICE TO COUNSELS: USA v. Hill...
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2014/10/application-for-disqualifications-28-usc-144-containing-affidavit-of-bias-and-prejudice-demand-for-r.html[10/29/2014 6:40:04 PM]