what you heard we were doing · 2/5/2015 1 what does the changing landscape of provider networks...
TRANSCRIPT
2/5/2015
1
WHAT DOES THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF
PROVIDER NETWORKS MEAN FOR YOUR
COMPLIANCE TOOLSHED?
Managed Care Compliance Conference
February 15–18, 2015
WHAT YOU HEARD WE WERE DOING . . .
BEFORE AFTER
2/5/2015
2
WHAT WE WERE TRYING TO DO . . .
BEFORE AFTER
TOPICS WE WILL COVER
�Why care provider networks are changing
�Media, regulator and other stakeholder
reactions to provider network changes
� Business and compliance strategies and tools
to help manage this evolving risk area
2/5/2015
3
HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION
Quality
Cost
Medical Associations Medical Associations Medical Associations Medical Associations
and Other Stakeholdersand Other Stakeholdersand Other Stakeholdersand Other Stakeholders
2/5/2015
4
News Media CoverageNews Media CoverageNews Media CoverageNews Media Coverage
2/5/2015
5
“EXAMINING ACCESS TO CARE TAKES ON HEIGHTENED IMPORTANCE AS “EXAMINING ACCESS TO CARE TAKES ON HEIGHTENED IMPORTANCE AS “EXAMINING ACCESS TO CARE TAKES ON HEIGHTENED IMPORTANCE AS “EXAMINING ACCESS TO CARE TAKES ON HEIGHTENED IMPORTANCE AS
ENROLLMENT GROWS IN MEDICAID MANAGED CARE PROGRAMSENROLLMENT GROWS IN MEDICAID MANAGED CARE PROGRAMSENROLLMENT GROWS IN MEDICAID MANAGED CARE PROGRAMSENROLLMENT GROWS IN MEDICAID MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS.”.”.”.”
OIG Report OIG Report OIG Report OIG Report ---- Access to Care in Medicaid Access to Care in Medicaid Access to Care in Medicaid Access to Care in Medicaid
Managed Care PlansManaged Care PlansManaged Care PlansManaged Care Plans
• Medicaid health plan provider network
directory accuracy
• Availability of provider appointments
• 51% of plan providers contacted
were not able to offer appointments
•not available at the location listed
•not accepting new Medicaid patients
•not participating in the plan
CMS ANNOUNCED NEW AUDIT PROTOCOLS IT WILL PILOT IN CY 2015 AUDITCMS ANNOUNCED NEW AUDIT PROTOCOLS IT WILL PILOT IN CY 2015 AUDITCMS ANNOUNCED NEW AUDIT PROTOCOLS IT WILL PILOT IN CY 2015 AUDITCMS ANNOUNCED NEW AUDIT PROTOCOLS IT WILL PILOT IN CY 2015 AUDITS S S S
RELATED TO MA NETWORK ACCESS / ADEQUACY AND PROVIDER NETWORK DATRELATED TO MA NETWORK ACCESS / ADEQUACY AND PROVIDER NETWORK DATRELATED TO MA NETWORK ACCESS / ADEQUACY AND PROVIDER NETWORK DATRELATED TO MA NETWORK ACCESS / ADEQUACY AND PROVIDER NETWORK DATAAAA
CMS MA Provider Network CMS MA Provider Network CMS MA Provider Network CMS MA Provider Network
Guidance and StandardsGuidance and StandardsGuidance and StandardsGuidance and Standards
• CY2015 Call Letter
Provider Contract
Termination Guidelines
• MMCM, Ch.4, Provider
Network Standards,
Significant Changes to
Networks
• MA Health Services
Delivery (HSD) Criteria
2/5/2015
6
KEY CHANGES IN CMS GUIDANCE
� Requirement to notify CMS 90 days in advance of ‘significant’ plan-initiated network changes
� Explain how access, notice and continuity of care requirements will be met
� Special Election Period (SEP)
� Existing SEP for exceptional circumstances
� Plan-initiated, mid-year, ‘significant’ changes
� Enrollee must demonstrate they’ve been affected
� SEPs will not be granted for changes effective 1/1 if enrollees notified prior to Annual Enrollment Period
KEY CHANGES IN CMS GUIDANCE
� Recommendation (best practice) to give affected providers more than 60 days advance notice
� Recommendation to give affected enrollees more than 30 days advance notice
� Recommendations for enrollee notice content� Contact information for alternative providers in network
� How to request continuity of care exception
� How to contact customer service for assistance
� Recommendations for call center talking points and FAQs for responding to inquiries from enrollees, provider and other stakeholders
2/5/2015
7
CMS CMS CMS CMS STATED STATED STATED STATED IT WILL REVISE ITS OWN NETWORK ADEQUACY IT WILL REVISE ITS OWN NETWORK ADEQUACY IT WILL REVISE ITS OWN NETWORK ADEQUACY IT WILL REVISE ITS OWN NETWORK ADEQUACY STANDARDS FOR STANDARDS FOR STANDARDS FOR STANDARDS FOR
EXCHANGES BASED EXCHANGES BASED EXCHANGES BASED EXCHANGES BASED ON WHAT ON WHAT ON WHAT ON WHAT NAIC RECOMMENDSNAIC RECOMMENDSNAIC RECOMMENDSNAIC RECOMMENDS
NAIC revisions to Managed Care Plan NAIC revisions to Managed Care Plan NAIC revisions to Managed Care Plan NAIC revisions to Managed Care Plan
Network Adequacy Model Act (#74)Network Adequacy Model Act (#74)Network Adequacy Model Act (#74)Network Adequacy Model Act (#74)
Proposed new requirements include
• submit “access plans” to state
regulators (filing or approval)
• access / adequacy criteria
• provider directory requirements
• continuity of care requirements
2/5/2015
8
TOOLS FOR YOUR TOOLSHED, AND HOW TO USE THEM
PROVIDER NETWORK PROVIDER NETWORK PROVIDER NETWORK PROVIDER NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYCHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYCHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYCHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACY
• Prevention:
• Compassion
• Communication
• Coordination
• Detection:
• Increase frequency / scope
of network monitoring
• Monitor member and
provider calls, complaints
and appeals
• Listen to other stakeholders
• Correction
• Rapid response
• Feedback loops
Frequent, proactive communication helps – A LOT
OTHER BEST PRACTICES FOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYOTHER BEST PRACTICES FOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYOTHER BEST PRACTICES FOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYOTHER BEST PRACTICES FOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACY
Communication PlanCommunication PlanCommunication PlanCommunication Plan
Consider not just providers, enrollees but
also those groups that advocate for them
• Medical Associations / Societies
• State Health Insurance Assistance
Programs (SHIP) offices
Consider not just your primary regulator
(CMS / Medicaid Agency) but also others
that may receive complaints / inquiries
• State Departments of Health
• State Departments of Insurance
• State Attorney General
Be ready with a media response plan
2/5/2015
9
OTHER BEST OTHER BEST OTHER BEST OTHER BEST PRACTICES PRACTICES PRACTICES PRACTICES FOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYFOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYFOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACYFOR NETWORK CHANGES / ACCESS & ADEQUACY
What’s what, who’s who, where are they located, what do they do?
TOOLS FOR YOUR TOOLSHED, AND HOW TO USE THEM
PROVIDER NETWORK DATA / DIRECTORY ACCURACYPROVIDER NETWORK DATA / DIRECTORY ACCURACYPROVIDER NETWORK DATA / DIRECTORY ACCURACYPROVIDER NETWORK DATA / DIRECTORY ACCURACY
• Prevention:• Educate providers on
importance of updating data
• Simplify provider update process (e.g., portals, CAQH)
• Detection:• Contact providers for updates
if many office locations listed, multiple specialties listed, no recent claims history, recent acquisition, etc.
• Compare plan network data to other sources of data (CAQH, Medicare, USPS, etc.)
• Correction• Rapid response
• Education / feedback loop with providers (importance of updating data)
2/5/2015
10
WHAT ELSE? OTHER QUESTIONS?
We covered
� Why managed care provider networks
are changing
� What we can learn from media,
regulator and other stakeholder
reactions to these changes
� How you can use business and
compliance strategies / tools to help
manage this evolving risk area
� Focused on network access &
adequacy, provider directory data
accuracy
REFERENCE MATERIALS / RESOURCES
� OIG Report: Access to Care – Provider Availability in Medicaid Managed Carehttp://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-13-00670.asp
� CMS 2015 Call Letter, Part C Provider Contract Termination Guidancehttp://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/downloads/Announcement2015.pdf
� Medicare Managed Care Manual, Ch.4, Section 110 – Access to and
Availability of Services (includes ‘Significant Changes to Networks’)http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/mc86c04.pdf
� CY2016 MA HSD Provider and Facility Specialties and Network Adequacy
Criteria Guidance (issued by CMS annually)http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-
Advantage/MedicareAdvantageApps/Downloads/CY2016_MA_HSD_Network_Criteria_Guidance.pdf
� National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) – Draft Revisions
to Network Adequacy Model Act, Comments in Responsehttp://www.naic.org/committees_b_rftf_namr_sg.htm