what next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and...

20
What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and GM crops? Or the transformation of global food systems? TWN Third World Network

Upload: others

Post on 04-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and GM crops?

Or the transformation of global food systems?

TWNThird World Network

Page 2: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

ContentsAcronyms 3Glossaryofterms 4Aboutthebriefing 5Keyissues 5Introduction 6GlyphosateandGeneticallyModified(GM)Crops 6 Weed resistance and other pesticides 9 Health and environmental risks 10Glyphosate:IARC/WHOassessmentandtheglobalresponse 12 Understanding the industry’s response 12Realalternatives 13Annexure:NewGMherbicidetolerantvarietiesintheUSA 15GlobalapprovalsforMON87708xMON89788(MON89788) 15References 16

Page 3: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

2A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

On 07 April 2015 the African Centre for Biosafety officially changed its name to the African Centre for Biodiversity (ACB). This name change was agreed by consultation within the ACB to reflect the expanded scope of our work over the past few years. All ACB publications prior to this date will remain under our old name of African Centre for Biosafety and should continue to be referenced as such.

We remain committed to dismantling inequalities in the food and agriculture system in Africa and our belief in peoples’ right to healthy and culturally appropriate food, produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems.

©The African Centre for Biodiversitywww.acbio.org.zaPO Box 29170, Melville 2109, Johannesburg, South Africa. Tel: +27 (0)11 486 1156.

The Network for a GE-Free Latin America (RALLT) was established in January 1999, inspired by the need for communities to develop global strategies to deal with the increase of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the region, and to prevent new introductions into the region.

The objectives of the Network are:• To avoid the introduction of transgenic organisms into new areas, supporting

national and local processes within the region;• To promote the creation of GE Free Zones; and• To support communities facing the impacts of the expansion of GE crops and the

associated technology package in their demands for full reparations.

The Third World Network (TWN) is an independent non-profit international network of organisations and individuals involved in issues relating to development, developing countries and North-South affairs. Its mission is to bring about a greater articulation of the needs and rights of peoples in the South, a fair distribution of world resources, and forms of development which are ecologically sustainable and fulfill human needs.

TWN’s objectives are:• To deepen the understanding of the development dilemmas and challenges

facing developing countries; and• To contribute to policy changes in pursuit of just, equitable and ecologically

sustainable development.

Design and layout: Adam Rumball, Sharkbouys Designs, JohannesburgCover design: Adam Rumball

Cover photograph: Medioambiente. www.paginapopular.net

TWNThird World Network

Page 4: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 3

Acronyms

AMPA AcompoundthatisaspecificagonistfortheAMPAreceptorANVISA NationalHealthSurveillanceAgency(Brazil)APHIS AnimalandPlantHealthInspectionService(APHIS)CA ConservationAgricultureCIMMYT InternationalMaizeandWheatImprovementCentreCSA ClimateSmartAgricultureEC EuropeanCommissionEFSA EuropeanFoodSafetyAuthorityFAO FoodandAgricultureOrganizationFESPROSA FederationofHealthProfessionals(Argentina)GMO GeneticallyModifiedOrganismHa HectaresHT HerbicideTolerantIAASTD InternationalAssessmentofAgriculturalKnowledge,Scienceand TechnologyforDevelopmentIARC InternationalAgencyforCancerResearchIR InsectResistantISAAA InternationalServicefortheAcquisitionofAgri-biotechApplicationsJMPR JointFAO-WHOMeetingonPesticideResiduesMRL MaximumresiduelevelsPAN PesticideActionNetworkRR RoundupReadySIMLESA SustainableIntensificationofMaize-Legumesystemsforfoodsecurityin EasternandSouthernAfricaUN UnitedNationsUNCTAD UNConferenceonTradeandDevelopmentUSA UnitedStatesofAmericaUSDA UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricultureUSEPA UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyWEA DanishWorkingEnvironmentAuthorityWHO WorldHealthOrganization

Page 5: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

4A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

Glossary of termsActiveingredient:Theingredientinapesticidethatisconsideredbiologicallyactive.

Adjuvant:Otherchemicalsaddedtotheactiveingredientincommercialherbicideformulationstoincreasetheirefficacy.Thepreciseformulationsofactiveingredientsandadjuvantsincommercialherbicidesarecloselyguardedcommercialsecrets.Riskassessmentsofherbicidesusuallyconcentrateontheactiveingredientandnottheactualchemicalformulationsused.

Agroecology:Isthestudyofecologicalprocessesthatoperateinagriculturalproductionsystems.Theprefixagro-referstoagriculture.

Biotechnology:Istheuseoflivingsystemsandorganismstodevelopormakeproducts,oranytechnologicalapplicationthatusesbiologicalsystems,livingorganismsorderivativesthereof,tomakeormodifyproductsorprocessesforspecificuse.

Carcinogen:Anysubstancecapableofcausingcancerinlivingtissue.

GeneticallyModifiedOrganism(GMO):Anyorganismwhosegeneticmaterialhasbeenalteredinawaythatdoesnotoccurnaturallybymatingand/ornaturalrecombination.Inagriculture,themajorityofGMOsarecropsthathavehadgenesaddedtothemthatenableanorganismtotoleratecertainchemicals,oraddedgenesfoundinsoilbacteriathatenabletheorganismtoproducecertainproteinsthataretoxictoinsectpests.

Glyphosate:Achemicalthatistheactiveingredientinmanyglyphosate-basedherbicides.Glyphosateisconsideredabroad-spectrumherbicidebecauseitsmodeofactioninhibitsametabolicpathwaythatispresentinallplantlife,aswellasinsomefungiandbacteria.

Glyphosate-basedherbicides:Herbicidesthatcontaintheactiveingredientglyphosate.

Herbicide:Atypeofpesticidespecificallydesignedtokillweeds,i.e.aformulationcontaininganactiveingredientplusadjuvants.

Herbicideresistance:Thisoccurswhenweedsnaturallydevelopresistancetoaherbicideovertimeduetolong-termexposure.Glyphosate-resistantweedsareamajorproblemintheUSA.

Herbicidetolerance(HT):Thisoccurswhenaplanthasbeengeneticallymodifiedtotoleratetheapplicationofcertainchemicalactiveingredients.Thevastmajorityofherbicidetolerantplantsaretolerantofglyphosate.

Modeofaction:Theoverallmannerinwhichaherbicideaffectsaplantatthetissueorcellularlevel.Forexample,glyphosateisanaminoacidinhibitor.Otherherbicides,suchas2,4-D,areauxingrowthregulators,whichactasanartificialgrowthhormone.

Pesticide:Abroadgroupofagriculturalchemicalsthatincludesherbicides(weed-killers),insecticides(forinsectpests),andfungicides(forplantdiseases).

Roundup:Monsanto’sbrandofcommercialglyphosate-basedherbicides.

RoundupReady(RR)crops:Monsanto’svarietiesofgeneticallymodifiedcropsthathavebeenspecificallydesignedtotoleratetheapplicationofglyphosate-basedherbicides.Forexample,RoundupReadymaizeandsoya.

Page 6: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 5

About this briefingThisbriefinghasbeenpromptedbytherecentconclusionoftheInternationalAgencyforCancerResearch(IARC),oftheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO),thatglyphosate,theworld’smost-usedchemicalingredientforweedcontrol,isa“probablehumancarcinogen”.

Inrecentyears,theuseofglyphosatehascometobeassociatedwithherbicide-tolerant(HT)geneticallymodified(GM)crops,withglyphosateuseincreasingdramaticallyinallmajorGMHTcrop-producingcountries.Theconsequencesforhumanhealthandtheenvironmenthavebeendisastrousinmanycommunities.AnumberofcountrieshavealreadytakenactiontoreduceorhalttheuseofglyphosateinresponsetotheIARCassessment.

WhileglyphosateisstillinuseandisheavilyrelieduponforGMsoyaproductioninparticular,Monsantoandotherbiotechnologyandagro-chemicalcompaniesarealreadyplanningforbusinessafterglyphosate.AplethoraofGMcropsthataretoleranttomultipleherbicidesarealreadyapprovedforthemarket,whileMonsantohasrecentlysoughtthepotentialacquisitionofSyngenta,theworld’slargestproducerofherbicides.

ItisimperativethattheIARC’sfindingstakethedebatefurther—beyondsimplyreplacingglyphosatewithothertoxicchemicalherbicides—intodeeperconversationsaboutthecharacteristicsofourfoodandagriculturesystemsandhowtheyinteractwithandimpactuponpeopleandtheenvironment.

Key Issues• Theintroductionofgeneticallymodified

(GM)herbicide-tolerant(HT)crops,suchasMonsanto’sRoundupReady(RR)varieties,hasledtodramaticincreasesintheuseofglyphosate.Between1997and2014theglobalareaexploitedbytheseHTcropsincreasedfrom6.9millionhato154millionha.IntheUSAoverallherbicideuseincreasedby237millionkgfrom1996to2011;RRsoyaalone

accountedfor70%ofthisincrease.InSouthAmerica,theintroductionofRRsoyahasseenglyphosateuseinArgentinaandUruguayincreasetenfold,whileBrazilisnowtheworld’slargestpesticidemarket.

• Thishugeincreaseinglyphosateusehasresultedinmassoutbreaksofglyphosate-resistantweeds,totheextentthatin2013glyphosate-resistantweedscoveredapproximately28millionhaintheUSA.BywayofresponsebiotechnologyandagrochemicalcompanieshavebegundevelopingGMcropswithresistancetomultipleherbicides,manyofwhichareolderandevenmoretoxicthanglyphosate.MonsantoisonthevergeofreleasinganewGMsoyavarietythatisresistanttoglyphosateanddicamba,suggestingthatthecompanyintendstoekeasmuchprofitfromglyphosateaspossible.(Dicambaisanotherherbicide;itisachemicalcompoundcomprisinganorganochloride(acompoundcontainingcarbon,chlorineandhydrogen)andaderivativeofbenzoicacid.)AtthetimeofwritingMonsantoisalsointhemiddleofatakeoverbidfortheworld’slargestherbicideproducer,Syngenta.

• Theimpactsofthismassiveincreaseinglyphosateuse,forbothhumanhealthandtheenvironment,havebeencatastrophic.RRsoyagrowingareasinArgentinahavewitnessedfourfoldincreasesintheratesofbirthdefectsandchildhoodcancers.SimilarrelationshipsbetweenglyphosateuseandnegativehealthimpactshavebeenfoundinCanadaandParaguay.Highlevelsofglyphosatehavealsobeenfoundasresiduesinharvestedsoybeansandinwatersources.Inaddition,theexpansionofRRsoyainSouthAmericahasproducedmassivedeforestation,

JavieraRulli.BASEIS.Presentation:LatinoamericaSojera.Socio&enviroimpactsofsoymonocultureinParaguay&Argentina.www.lasojamata.net

Page 7: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

6A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

lossofbiodiversityandland-lossforindigenouscommunities.

• TheIARC’sfindingthatglyphosateisa“probablehumancarcinogen”hasbeenrejectedbybiotechnologyandpesticidecorporations,whocitefindingsof‘safety’fromanumberofregulatorybodies.However,thesesamecompanieshavebeenintimatelyinvolvedintheassessmentsconductedbytheregulatingagencies.

• TheIARC,ontheotherhand,haslookedatallavailablestudies,includingthosethatexamineformulatedproducts,anditsassessmentisup-to-date.Inresponse,severerestrictionsontheuseofglyphosate,oroutrightbans,havebeenputinplaceinnumerouscountries.InArgentinaandBrazilthefederationofpublichealthprofessionalsandthepublicprosecutorrespectivelyhavecalledforthebanningofglyphosate.

• Whilethebansonglyphosatearetimelyandappropriate,giventheevidence,othertoxicherbicides,suchas2,4-Dichlorophenoxyaceticacid(2,4-D)anddicamba,similarlymustcomeunderurgentreview.(2,4-Disacommonsystemicherbicide,asyntheticauxin(planthormone)).TheIARCitselfhasrecentlyclassified2,4-Das‘possiblycarcinogenictohumans’.Comprehensiveindependentassessmentsoftheseherbicidesandtheirimpactsonhumanhealthandtheenvironmentmustbeconducted.

• Appropriateinternationalbodiesmustinitiateaprogrammeoffairandequitablereparationstoaffectedpeoples,togetherwiththerestorationandremediationofcontaminatedenvironments.

• Ashiftfromchemicalinput-intensiveweedmanagementandchemicalinputagricultureingeneral,toagroecologicalmethodologiesisurgentlyneeded.

IntroductionGlyphosateistheactiveingredientinmanychemicallybasedherbicides.Glyphosate’smodeofactivity(howitworks)isbasedontheinactivationofanenzymeoftheshikimatemetabolicpathway(theEPSPSenzyme).Thisenzymeiscriticalfortheproductionofthreedifferentaminoacidsessentialforplantgrowth,

aswellasseveralothermetabolitesthatplayacriticalroleinprotectingorganismsatdifferentstagesofdevelopment.Becausetheshikimatepathwayispresentinallplantlife,aswellassomefungiandbacteria,glyphosateisreferredtoasa‘non-selective’or‘broad-spectrum’herbicide.1Otherchemicalsknownasadjuvantsorsurfactantsareaddedtoglyphosateincommerciallyavailableherbicideformulations,suchasMonsanto’sRoundupbrand.2

Glyphosatewasfirstsynthesisedin1950butitwasnotuntil1974thatascientistworkingforMonsantoidentifiedthechemical’spotentialforuseinagriculture.Ithassubsequentlybecometheworld’stopsellingherbicide.Monsanto’spatentonglyphosateexpiredin2000,leadingtodramaticincreasesingenericproduction,particularlyinChina.Monsantostillholdspatentsandtrademarksoveranumberofglyphosate-basedherbicideformulationsandcontinuestomakebillionsofdollarsevery-yearfromglyphosate,thankstotherapidspreadofgeneticallymodified(GM)glyphosate-tolerantcrops(forwhichMonsanto’sRoundupReady(RR)varietiesarebyfarthemostcommon).3

In1995,whenthefirstglyphosate-tolerantcropswereapproved,theglobalmarketforglyphosatewaswortharoundUS$1.2billion.4By2012thishadincreasedtoapproximatelyUS$5.5billionanditisexpectedtoincreasetoUS$8.8billionby2019.5

Glyphosate and Genetically Modified (GM) CropsDespitethepromiseofnumerousbenefitssuchasenhancednutritionandclimatechangeresilience,nearlyallGMcropsgrowntodayhavebeenengineeredtosurviveexposuretochemicallybasedherbicides(herbicide-tolerant(HT)varieties),ortoproducetheirowninternaltoxinstokillinsectpests(insect-resistant(IR)varieties).Manycropscombinebothofthesetraitsandareknownas‘stacked’varieties.AmongtheHTvarieties,thosetoleranttoglyphosate-basedherbicides,such

Page 8: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 7

asMonsanto’sbrandedRoundupherbicides,arebyfarthemostcommon.ItmustbenotedthatwhiletheexactfiguresonglyphosatetoleranthectaresplantedarehardtocomebyasindustryfiguresrefertooverallHThectaresplanted,whichcouldincludevarietiestoleranttootherchemicalssuchasglufosinate.However,itisfairtosaythatglyphosatetoleranceaccountsforthevastmajorityofoverallHTvarietycultivation.

Theadoptionofherbicide-tolerantGMcrops,thoughconfinedtoahandfulofcountries,hasbeenspectacular.In1997theywereplantedon6.9millionhectares(ha)worldwide,accountingfor54%ofthetotalglobalareaofGMcrops.By2014thishadincreasedto154.3millionha,accountingfor85%ofGMcropsplantedglobally(eitherassingletraitherbicidetoleranceor‘stacked’withinsect-resistantvarieties).6

Over86%oftheworld’sGMcropsaregrowninNorthandSouthAmerica.ThemaindriverbehindthewidespreadgrowingofGMcropsinSouthAmericahasbeentheuseofglyphosate-tolerant(orRoundupReady)soya,whichisnowplantedonover55millionha.BrazilandArgentinaarethemajorHTsoyaproducersinSouthAmerica,havinggrown29millionand20.8millionharespectively,in2014.In

Argentinathisareahasmorethandoubledsincetheturnofthecentury,whileinBraziltheareaunderHTsoyahasincreasedbyastaggering778%overthesameperiod.7

SimilartrendshavebeenobservedinotherHTsoyagrowingcountriesinSouthAmerica.InParaguay,thesoyaareahastrebledsincethemid-1990sto3.2millionha,covering80%ofthecountry’sagriculturalland;95%ofthissoyaisoneofMonsanto’sRoundupReadyvarieties.8InBoliviaover1millionhaofHTsoyawerecultivatedin2014/15,whichisa400,000haincreasesinceHTsoyawasfirstgrowntherein2008.9Between2003/14and2014/15theHTsoyaareainUruguayincreasedfrom77,000hatoover1.35millionha.10

Glyphosatewasalreadytheworld’sbest-sellingherbicidebythetimethefirstHTcropsweregrowninthemid-1990s,buttherapidadoptionofHTcropshasresultedinhugeincreasesinglyphosateuseitself.IntheUSA,overallherbicideuseincreasedby237millionkgfrom1996to2011,withHTsoyaaloneaccountingfor70%ofthisincrease.Canadasawathreefoldincreaseinglyphosateusefrom2005to2011,from34millionlitresto102millionlitres.11

InArgentinaglyphosateusehasincreasedfrom20–26millionlitresperyearin1996to

GlobalGMandGMHTcropplantings(millionsHa),1996–2014

Source:InternationalServicefortheAcquisitionofAgri-biotechApplications(ISAAA).

Page 9: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

8A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

Glyphosate, Climate Change and No-Till Agriculture

Climatechangeandpredictionsoverpopulationgrowthhavemadesustainability(itselfamuchdisputedterm)afundamentalcomponentofcurrentagriculturaldebate.Mechanicaltillageofthesoil,whetherbyhand,draughtanimalortractor-power,hasbeenastandardagriculturalpracticesinceancienttimes.However,inmorerecenttimesthishasbeenacknowledgedasacauseofsoildegradationanderosionandalsoasalargesourceofgreenhousegasemissions—asignificantamountofcarbondioxideisheldintheworld’sagriculturalsoils.14

Inano-tillsystem,minimalsoildisturbanceshouldpreventsoilerosionandallowthebuild-upoforganicmatterinthesoil.Thereiscurrentlysomedebateregardingprecisedefinitionsofwhatconstitutesno-tillagriculture.TheFoodandAgricultureOrganisation(FAO)oftheUnitedNations(UN)statesthatsoildisturbancesshouldbe“reducedtoanabsoluteminimumoravoided”.Bydefaultthisrulesoutthemajorityofmanualweedingmethodswhichwouldneedtobereplacedwithalternatives;thesecouldincludetheuseofherbicidesorothermethods(suchasbio-pesticides,cropcoverorcroprotation).

TheFAOisambiguousovertheroleofherbicidesinno-tillsystems,sayingonlythat,alongwithotherexternalinputstheyshouldbe“appliedoptimally”,thoughitdoesemphasisethatforbestresultsno-tillshouldbepracticedinconjunctionwithothermethods.15Naturallythebiotechnologyandagrochemicalindustrieshavebeenquicktopromotetheuseofherbicides(suchasglyphosate)andthepotentialforHTcrops,claimingthatthesearetailor-madetofitintono-tillagesystemsandthattheywillthereforemakeacontributiontosustainablepractices.16

ConservationAgriculture(CA)holdszeroorminimumtillageasoneofitsthreecentralprinciples(alongwithleavingcropresiduesinfieldsandinter-croppingorcroprotation).ManyprojectspromotingCAinSub-SaharanAfrica,suchastheSustainableIntensificationofMaize-LegumesystemsforFoodSecurityinEasternandSouthernAfrica(SIMLESA),whichismanagedbytheInternationalMaizeandWheatImprovementCentre(CIMMYT),havebeenactivelypromotingtheuseofherbicides,includingglyphosateasaminimumtillagepractice.17

ClimateSmartAgriculture(CSA),acontroversialconceptoriginatingfromtheUNFAOandsubsequentlytakenonbytheWorldBankandthegovernmentsoftheUSAandtheNetherlands,hascitedHTcanolainCanadaasbeingaCSAbestpracticeduetoitsminimumtillageaspect.18However,tillingisalsonowrecommendedasatooltodealwiththeevolutionandspreadofherbicide-resistantweeds,particularlyinmaizeandsoya,resultingfromtheoveruseofherbicideswithHTcrops.

ItishugelyironicthatGMcrops,whichatpresentarefurtherentrenchingsystemicallyunsustainableagriculturalproductionmethods,arenowbeingtoutedasasolutiontotheclimatecrisis.Herbicide-tolerantcropsmaywellreducesoildisturbancesintheshortterm,butarethepracticesthatarecomplementarytono-till—suchascropcoverorinter-cropping—feasibleinthelarge-scale,mono-croppedsystemswithinwhichHTcropsarecurrentlygrown?

Page 10: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 9

200millionlitresby2013.InBraziltheoverallsalesofpesticidesincreasedby360%from2000–2009,andthecountrysurpassedtheUSAastheworld’slargestpesticidemarket.Overthesameperiod,salesofglyphosateincreasedfromjustunder50,000tonsto300,000tonsandin2010soybeanfieldsaccountedfor44%ofallpesticidesappliedinBrazilianagriculture.12Uruguay’sglyphosateconsumptionincreasedtenfoldfrom1998–2010,from1.22millionkgto12.29millionkg,whileinBoliviatheuseofglyphosateincreasedfrom3.18millionlitresin2004to11.19millionin2008.13

Weed resistance and other pesticides

Despiterepeatedwarningsfromweedscientistsandenvironmentaliststhatglyphosate-tolerantcropswouldleadtotheemergenceofglyphosate-resistantweeds,thesefearsweredismissedbythebiotechnologyandagrochemicalindustries.In1997,shortlyafterthefirstHTcropswereplantedglobally,Monsantostatedthat‘theprobabilityofglyphosate-resistantweedsevolvingwillnotincreasesignificantly’.19

However,accordingtoadatabaserunbytheWeedScienceSocietyofAmerica,32speciesofweedaroundtheworldhavedevelopedresistancetoglyphosate.Intheearly2000smostofthesedocumentedcasespertainedtofieldsofGMglyphosate-tolerantcrops,andmostcasesoverallareincountrieswhereGMglyphosate-tolerantcropsaregrown:14intheUSA,10inAustralia,7inArgentina,5inCanadaand6inBrazil.IntheUnitedStatesthesituationhasreachedepidemicproportions,withtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)estimatingthat28.3millionhaofUSfarmlandswereinfestedwithglyphosate-resistantweedsin2013.This,inturn,hasdrivenupoverallherbicideusebybetween25%and50%.20

Inresponsetothis,thebiotechnologyandagrochemicalindustrieshavebeenencouragingfarmerstouseotherherbicidesandaredevelopingnewGMHTcropsthataretoleranttoothertoxicherbicides,suchasglufosinate,2,4-D,dicambaandIsoxaflutole(seeAnnexure).21ManyofthesenewGMvarietieswillbestackedformultipleherbicidetolerance,resultinginhugeoverallincreases

inherbicideuseandwidespreadcombinationsoftoxicchemicalsnotpreviouslyseen.DowChemical,forexample,planstoreleaseits‘Enlist’GMsoybeanvarietiesin2016.Thesewillbestackedwithtolerancetoglyphosateand2,4-D,achemicalthathasbeenlinkedwithvariousformsofcancerforanumberofyears.222,4-DhasbeenrecentlyclassifiedbytheIARCas‘possiblycarcinogenictohumans’,whichisonelevellowerthanthatofglyphosate(‘probablycarcinogenictohumans’).Nonetheless,a‘substantialminority’oftheIARCworkinggroup(whichalsoincludedmembersoftheindustry-sponsored2,4-Dworkinggroup)consideredtheretobelimitedevidenceofcarcinogenicityinhumansandsufficientevidenceofcarcinogenicityinanimals,whichwouldplace2,4-Dinthecategoryofa‘probable’humancarcinogen,thesamelevelasglyphosate.23DowhopesitsEnlistsystemwillgenerateuptoUS$1billioninextrarevenuesby2018,andplanstomarketinbothNorthandSouthAmerica.24

ForMonsantoinparticular,thesedevelopmentscouldhavesevereramificationsforitsbusinessmodel.In2014thecompanymadeoverUS$5billionfromagrochemicals,thebulkofwhichcamefromitsRoundupherbicides.25InJanuary2015MonsantoreceivedregulatoryapprovalintheUSAforanewGMcottonvarietythatistoleranttoglyphosate,glufosinateanddicamba,andanewGMsoyavarietythatistoleranttodicamba.Dicamba,like2,4-D,isasynthetic‘auxin’herbicidethatactsasanartificialgrowthhormoneinvirtuallyallbroadleafplants,causingdeformitiesandultimatelyplantdeath.ThePesticideActionNetwork(PAN)haslisteddicambaasadevelopmentalorreproductivetoxinandasa

PhotograohcontributedbyElizabethBravo,andtakeninParaguay.Sourceunknown.

Page 11: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

10A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

possibleendocrine(hormone)disruptor.26Incommonwith2,4-D,dicambaishighlydriftprone,beingresponsibleforthethirdhighestincidentsofcropdamageintheUSA.AccordingtoprojectionsfromMonsantoandtheUSDA,dicamba-tolerantsoybeansareexpectedtoresultina500-foldincreaseingeneraldicambauseinsoyacultivation.27Monsantoissetonincreasingproductionofdicambaandplansoninvestingawhopping$1billioninadicambaproductionfacilityinLuling,Louisiana.i

However,farfromreplacingglyphosate,itappearsthatdicambawillbeusedasacomplementaryherbicidetokilltheweedsthatarenowresistanttoglyphosate.Monsanto’soriginalapplicationforitsdicamba-tolerantsoyavariety,MON87708,statesthatit“willbecombinedwithMON89788(RoundupReady2Yield)”andthat“thecombinationofdicambaandglyphosatetoleranceinsoybeanswillalsoprovidethebasisfordelayingorpreventingtheevolutionoffurtherweed[s]resistancetoglyphosate,dicambaandherbicidesingeneral”.28ThisstackedGMsoyavarietyisexpectedtobereleasedduring2016,whileMonsantointendsalsotointroduceanaccompanyingdicambaandglyphosatebasedherbicidemixture.29NowthatPioneerHi-BredhasconfirmeditwillbelicensingMonsanto’snewstackedGMsoybeanvariety,industryanalystspredictitcouldbegrownonapproximately90%oftheUSsoybeanarea.30

ThoughthebiotechnologyindustryinsiststhatapprovalsofGMOsshouldbepurely‘science-based’,regulatoryapprovalofaGMcropforimportpurposesisoftensoughtbyamajorGMgrainimportertostrengthenapplicationsforcommercialcultivation.Monsantohasalreadygainedimportapprovalforitsdicamba-tolerantsoyavariety(asfoodorfeed)intheEuropeanUnion(EU),thePhilippines,TaiwanandSouthKorea.Thoughitsstackeddicambaandglyphosate-tolerantvarietywillnotbeavailableuntil2016,ittoohasbeengrantedimportapprovalinJapanandSouthKorea(seeAnnexure).31

Morerecently,Monsanto’shighprofileattempttoacquireSyngenta,theglobalmarketleader

inagrochemicals,suggeststhatMonsantostillseesalucrativefutureinchemicalherbicidesandpesticidesandalonger-termshiftawayfromglyphosate.Atthetimeofwriting(June2015)SyngentahadjustrejectedasecondofferofapproximatelyUS$45billion;itsaidthatMonsanto’sofferundervaluedthecompanyandcitedconcernsthatsuchadealwouldnotpassmusterwithvariousanti-trustauthoritiesaroundtheworld,includingintheUS.Industryanalystspredictthat,inordertoappeaseanti-trustregulators,MonsantowillhavetosellpartsofSyngenta’sbusiness,includingitsseedand(possibly)glyphosateunits.TherewouldbenoshortageofpotentialsuitorsforSyngenta’sseedbusinessshouldthishappen,withallthemajorseedandagrochemicalcompanieslinkedtothis.32

ShouldMonsantobesuccessfulinitsacquisitionofSyngenta,thenewentitywouldcontrolalmostone-thirdoftheglobalagrochemicalmarket(worthUS$57billionin2014).ItwouldalsodramaticallyexpandMonsanto’sglobalfootprint,asabout50%ofSyngenta’srevenuescomefrom“fast-growingemergingmarkets”.33InthemajorGMproducingregionsofNorthandSouthAmerica,Monsanto’snewpesticidemarketshareswouldbe42%and28%respectively.34ReportshaveemergedthatMonsantowillalsoseektoincorporatethenewlycombinedcompanyintheUnitedKingdom,amovethatcouldreduceMonsanto’sannualtaxbillbymorethanUS$500million.35

Health and environmental risks

Industry-linkedsourcesclaimthatglyphosateandcommercialherbicideformulations,suchasMonsanto’sRoundup,aresafe.Buttheseclaimsarebasedonoutdatedandlargelyunpublishedstudiescommissionedbypesticidecompaniesinsupportoftheproduct’sregistration.Further,thesestudiestestonlyglyphosate,theactiveingredient,andnotthecommerciallysoldherbicideformulations.Independentlaboratorystudieswithmammalsandhumancellshavefoundtheseformulations,andtheadjuvantchemicalsinthem,tobeevenmoretoxicthanglyphosateitself.36

i. Gillam,C.June2014.Reuters.Monsantotoinvestmorethan$1blnindicambaherbicideproduction. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/monsanto-invest-more-1-bln-203825246.html

Page 12: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 11

InArgentinatheimpactsofsprayingglyphosateusedinconjunctionwithRRsoyahavebeendevastating.AreportcommissionedbytheprovincialgovernmentofChacofoundthattherateofbirthdefectshadincreasedfourfoldandthatrateofchildhoodcancershadtripledwithinadecadeoftheadoptionofGMHTcrops,singlingoutglyphosateinparticular.AgroupofArgentinephysiciansandscientists,usingclinicaldata,foundincreasedincidencesoftoxicliverdisease,neurologicaldevelopmentalproblemsinchildren,kidneyfailureandrespiratoryproblems.37

Similarly,epidemiologicalstudiescarriedoutinParaguayandCanadahaveshownarelationshipbetweenexposuretoglyphosate-basedherbicidesandbirthdefectsandmiscarriages.38ExposuretoRounduphasalsobeenlinkedtoanepidemicofchronickidneydiseaseinfarmingregionsofSriLanka.39

Inadditiontodirectexposurefromspraying,theconsumptionofRRmaizeandsoyacontainingpesticideresiduesisanotherlong-termandlargelyun-investigatedsourceofhealthrisk.In2014anindependent,peer-reviewedstudycomparedcompositionaldifferencesinRRsoybeanswiththosegrownunderaconventionalagriculturalsystem(non-GMbutstillusingchemicalinputs)andanorganicsystem(i.e.nochemicalinputs).AllindividualsamplesofGMsoyacontainedresiduesofbothglyphosateanditsbreakdownproduct,AMPA(acompoundthatisaspecificagonistfortheAMPAreceptorandwhichmimicstheeffectsoftheneurotransmitterglutamate)withaverageconcentrationsof3.26mg/kgand5.74mg/kgrespectively.40Thisiswellabovelevelsofglyphosatethathavebeenfoundtoinducetheproliferationofcancercellsinvitro.41Bycomparison,nosamplesofconventionalororganicsoybeansshowedanyresiduesofglyphosateorAMPA.Theauthorsconcludedthat“lackofdataonpesticideresiduesinmajorcropplantsisaseriousgapofknowledgewithpotentialconsequencesforhumanandanimalhealth”.42

Thereareregulationsinplacethatgovernthemaximumresiduelevels(MRLs)ofpesticidesinfood,butthereissomecontroversyoverhowthesearecalculatedandwhoactuallysetstheselimits.Forexample,afterthecommercialisation

ofHTsoyain1996,theEuropeanUnionMRLforimportedsoyaincreased200-fold,from0.1mg/kgto20mg/kg.43ThoughthemajorityofRRsoyagrownworldwideisusedforanimalfeed,thisisnotthecasewithallGMcrops.InSouthAfrica,forexample,wheremaizeisastaplefood,HTmaizeaccountedforover60%oftheentiremaizecropin2013/14.44

Therearealsoconsiderableenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwithglyphosateuse.Theserangefromimpactsonsoilbiodiversityandplantnutrientintake,todecliningbirdpopulations(thewildplantsandweedsthatglyphosateandotherherbicideseradicateareanimportantfoodsourceformanyspeciesofbird).45InNorthAmerica,MonarchButterflypopulationshavefallenby90%,chieflybecausehugeincreasesinglyphosateuseintheUSmaizebelthaseradicatedmillionsofhaofmilkweedinthebreedinggroundsoftheMonarchButterfly.46InArgentinaandParaguay,theexpansionofRRsoyahasresultedinmassivedeforestationandlossofnaturalvegetation,aswellaslossofthetraditionalterritoriesofindigenouscommunities.

Agriculturalpesticidessuchasglyphosateareamajorsourceofwaterpollutionandcanenterriversandstreamsviasoilrun-offorleaching,ordirectlywhenappliedaerially.47Onceinwaterglyphosateishighlysolubleandthereforemobileinwatersystems.Studieshaverevealedglyphosate-basedherbicideformulationstobehighlytoxictoaquaticlifeandamphibians.48From2008–2010thegovernmentofQuebec,Canada,testedfourriversinmaizeandsoyagrowingareasforpesticides;glyphosatewasfoundin86%ofthesamples.49AUSgeologicalsurveyfrom2001–2006detectedglyphosate

http://horizontesur.org/radio/index.php/paren-de-fumigar.html.Sourceunknown.

Page 13: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

12A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

anditsbreakdownproduct,AMPA,in32%of608watersamplescollected.Inareaswithnearcontinualapplications(commoninareaswithHTcrops),glyphosateandAMPAweredetectedinnearlyeverysample.50

Glyphosate: IARC/WHO assessment and the global responseAgainstthisbackdrop,inMarch2015theIARC,thebodytaskedwithprovidingevidencetoguidethecancercontrolpoliciesoftheWHO,announcedthatglyphosateisa“probablehumancarcinogen”.TheIARChaddrawnthisconclusionfollowingayear-longreviewofthescientificliteratureontheherbicide,inwhichitfound“convincingevidence”thatglyphosatecausescancerinlaboratoryanimals,“limitedevidence”thatitdoessoinagriculturalworkers,andevidencethatitcausesDNAandchromosomaldamageinhumancells.51

InternationalreactiontotheIARC’sfindingshasbeenswift,andisnotmerelyconfinedtotheglobalnorth.Colombiahassuspendedaerialsprayingofglyphosateoncocaplantations,whileBermudaandSriLankahavebothbannedglyphosateimports.InEuropetheDanishWorkingEnvironmentAuthority(WEA)concurredwiththefindingsoftheIARC,whileGermany’sstateconsumerprotectionministerscalledfor“thesupplytoandusebyprivatepersonstobebannedforprecautionaryreasons”;52andtheFrenchenvironmentandenergyministerhasaskedgardencentrestostopself-servicesalesofRoundup.53InArgentinatheFederationofHealthProfessionals(FESPROSA),whichrepresentsmorethan30,000doctorsandhealthprofessionals,hascalledforthebanningofglyphosate.54TheBrazilianpublicprosecutorhaswrittentothecountry’sNationalHealthSurveillanceAgency(ANVISA)askingtheagencytoperformanurgenttoxicologicalre-evaluationofglyphosatewiththeexpectationofadomesticbanonherbicidesbasedonthechemical.

Understanding the industry’s response

Predictably,theIARC’sfindingshavebeenmetwithafiercebacklashfromtheagrochemicalindustry.Monsantoclaimedtobe“outraged”bytheassessmentandaccusedtheIARCof“cherry-picking”dataandhavingaclear“agenda-drivenbias”.55Acommonresponsehasbeentocitenumerousregulatoryagenciesaroundtheworldthathavefoundglyphosatesafe,includingtheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA),theEuropeanFoodSafetyAuthority(EFSA)andtherecentGermangovernment’sassessmentofglyphosate,conductedonbehalfoftheEuropeanCommission(EC).

However,unliketheseandotherregulatorybodies,theIARChaslookedatallavailableandup-to-datestudiesinthescientificliterature,includingstudiesperformedontheformulatedproduct.56LargepartsofthemuchrecentlycitedGermangovernmentreviewofglyphosatewereactuallycarriedoutbytheEuropeanGlyphosateTaskForce,anagrochemicalindustrygroup.57Inaddition,in1985theUSEPAhadoriginallyclassifiedglyphosateas“possiblycarcinogenictohumans”,basedontumoursfoundinmice;afindingwhichwasdowngradedto“non-carcinogenicityinhumans”in1991.Thisre-interpretationreportedlyfollowedinputfromMonsanto.58TheEuropeanFoodSafetyAuthority(EFSA),whosefindingsonglyphosatecontradictthoseoftheIARC’s,foryearshasbeenaccusedofconflictsofinterestandalackoftransparency.59

Interestingly,twooftheotherpesticidesreviewedbytheIARCatthesametimeasglyphosate,i.e.tetrachlorvinphosandparathion,werebothclassifiedas“possiblycarcinogenictohumans”,whichisalevelbelowglyphosate,butbotharesubjecttorestricteduse,unlikeglyphosate.TetrachlorvinphosisbannedintheEuropeanUnionwhiletheuseofparathionhasbeenseverelyrestrictedsincethe1980s.AllauthorisedusesinboththeEUandUSAwerecancelledby2003.60

ItisworryingtonotethatinresponsetotheIARCclassificationtheJointFAO-WHOMeetingonPesticideResidues(JMPR),abodywhoseprimaryfunctionistoadviseonpesticideMRLs

Page 14: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 13

infood,hasdecidedtoundertakeareviewofthedatathattheIARCusedinreachingthisnewclassification.Asnotedinarecentletter,signedbynineNGOs61,thetaskforcesetupbytheJMPRtothisendcontains‘severalmemberswithactualorapparentconflictsofinterest,includingtiestoglyphosateusersandproducersincludingMonsanto’.ThelettercalledupontheJMPRtoaccepttheIARC’sclassificationand‘notestablishaprocesstosecond-guesstherecentworkofIARC’.62

Real AlternativesInlightoftheaccelerateduseofglyphosatewiththeuseofGMherbicide-tolerantcrops,andthedevelopmentofGMcropstoleranttotheherbicides2,4-Danddicamba,includingincombinationwithglyphosate,theIARC’sconclusionthatglyphosateisa“probablehumancarcinogen”indicatesthatseriousactionisneededtoprotecttheenvironmentandhumanhealth.Thisshouldstartwith:

1. Animmediatebanonallusesofglyphosate.2. Adequatemeasuresshouldbeputinplace

toensureothermoretoxicchemicalsdonotreplaceglyphosate.

3. Animmediatesuspensionoftheuseof2,4-Danddicamba-tolerantcropsandahalttoanynewapprovalsforGMherbicidetolerantcrops.

4. AcomprehensiveassessmentoftheimpactsanduseofGMherbicide-tolerantcropsandaccompanyingherbicidesonhumanhealthandtheenvironment,inparticularinallRRsoyaproducingareas.Theassessmentshouldincludefullparticipationbytheaffectedpeoplesandlocalcommunities.

5. Subjecttotheoutcomesoftheseassessments,measuresshouldbetakentoinitiateathoroughprogrammeofreparationstoaffectedpeoplesandthecomprehensiverestorationandremediationofcontaminatedecosystems.

6.Ashiftfromchemicalinput-intensiveweedmanagement,andagricultureingeneral,toagroecologicalmethodologies.

Biotechnologyandagrochemicalcompaniesarealreadyinvestingsignificantlyinthe

developmentofnewGMHTcropsandtheuseofotherchemicalherbicidesinadditiontoglyphosate.TheintroductionofnewGMHTcropswillinevitablyleadtoaviciouscycleofincreasingtheuseofchemicalssuchas2,4-Danddicamba,andtheevolutionandspreadofresistantweeds,increasingtherisktohumanandenvironmentalhealth.

Itisvitalatthisjuncturethatthestormofcontroversyaroundglyphosatebecomesacatalystfordeeperconversationsaboutthefuturedirectionsofagriculturalpolicyandfoodproduction.Thereisagrowingrecognitionthatthestatusquoofhighchemicalinputsandmass-producedmonocultures,isuntenable—inboththeirenvironmentalandsocialcosts—andwillnotbeabletofeedagrowingglobalpopulationintheeraofclimatechange.ThiswasaconclusionreachedbythegroundbreakingInternationalAssessmentofAgriculturalKnowledge,ScienceandTechnologyforDevelopment(IAASTD),thelargeststudyonagricultureundertakentodate,whichcalledfora“thoroughandradical”overhaulofagriculturalpoliciesinthe21stcentury.63

Instead,theIAASTDcalledforgovernmentstostrengthentheirfocusonagroecologicalsciences.Agroecology,whichusesecologicalprinciplesforthedesignandmanagementofsustainableagriculturalsystems,hasconsistentlyprovencapableofincreasingproductivitysustainablyandhasfargreaterpotentialforfightinghunger,particularlyduringeconomicandclimaticallyuncertaintimes.Thiscalltofocusonagroecologyhassincebeentakenupforexample,bythethenUN

JuanBertola

Page 15: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

14A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

SpecialRapporteurontherighttofood64andtheUNConferenceonTradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD)initsTradeandEnvironmentReview2013.65

Therearenosilverbulletstoendthisstruggleandcircumstanceswilldifferdependingonparticularagroecologicalandsocio-economiccontexts.However,alternativefarmingandfoodsystems,encompassedbyagroecology,food

sovereigntyandsustainablefoodsystems66offerasetofprinciplesthatcanguideusforward.Chiefamongsttheseareprinciplesaroundenvironmentalsustainability,socialequity,democraticparticipationindecision-making,andaccountability.Thesearealongwayfromwhatiscurrentlybeingofferedbythekeyarchitectsofglobalfoodsystems,whowillnotgiveuptheirprivilegedpositionslightly.Thereismuchworkstilltobedone.

Page 16: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 15

Annexure: New GM herbicide-tolerant varieties in the USA

Company Crop Event Herbicides Approved

Dow Cotton DAS-8191Ø-7 2,4-D,glufosinate Underassessment

Monsanto Soybean MON87708 Dicamba 2015

Monsanto Cotton MON-887Ø1-3 Dicamba,glufosinate

2014

Bayer/Syngenta Soybean SYHT0H2 Glufosinate,HPPD 2014

Dow Soybean DAS-444Ø6-6 2,4-D,glufosinate,glyphosate

2014

Dow Soybean DAS-68416-4 2,4-D,glufosinate 2014

Dow Maize DAS-40278-9 2,4-D,ACCase-Inhibitor

2014

BASF Soybean BPS-CV127-9 Imidazolinone 2014

Bayer&M.S.Technologies

Soybean FG72 Glyphosate,Isoxaflutole

2013

Source:AnimalandPlantHealthInspectionService(APHIS)oftheUSDA.

Global approvals for MON 87708 x MON89788 (MON89788)

Country Food Feed Cultivation

Australia (2012)

Brazil 2010 2010

Canada (2012) (2012) (2012)

Colombia 2012 2012 2012

EuropeanUnion (2015) (2015)

Japan 2014 2013(2012)

Mexico 2013(2012)

NewZealand (2012)

Philippines (2014) (2014)

SouthKorea 2012 2012(2012)

Taiwan (2013)

Uruguay 2012

USA (2011) (2011) (2015)Source:InternationalServicefortheAcquisitionofAgri-biotechApplications(ISAAA).

Page 17: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

16A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

References

1 HelanderM.,SaloniemiI.andSaikkonenK.2012.Glyphosateinnorthernecosystems.TrendsinPlantScience,Vol.17,No.10.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.05.008.

2 ACB.2012.Howmuchglyphosateisonyourdinnerplate?SA’sfoodsafetycompromisedbylackoftesting.Johannesburg:AfricanCentreforBiosafety.http://acbio.org.za/images/stories/dmdocuments/ACB_Glyphosate_Food_Safety_in_SA_July2012.pdf

3 Ibid.4 Glyphosatefact-sheet.PesticideActionNetwork.http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/Actives/glyphosa.htm5 GlobalglyphosatemarketisexpectedtoreachUSD8.79billionby2019:TransparencyMarketResearch.11

February2014.PRNewswire.http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-glyphosate-market-is-expected-to-reach-usd-879-billion-by-2019-transparency-market-research-244861481.html

6 ISAAA.Globalstatusofcommercializedbiotech/GMcrops:1997–2014.See:http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/default.asp

7 Soystats.International:Adoptionofbiotechenhancedseed-stock. http://soystats.com/international-adoption-of-biotech-enhanced-seedstock/.8 CBAN.2015.AreGMcropsbetterfortheEnvironment?Ottawa:CanadianBiotechnologyActionNetwork(CBAN).9 ISAAA2008,2014.10 MarkleyB.2014.Uruguay—Oilseedsandproductsannual.USDAGAINreport.Montevideo:USDAForeign

AgriculturalService.11 CBAN,2015.12 Catacora-VargasG.,GaleanoP.,AgapitoS.Z.,ArandaD.,Palau,T.andNodari,R.O.2012.Soybeanproductioninthe

SouthernconeoftheAmericas:Updateonlandandpesticideuse.13 CBAN,2015.14 FriedrichT.andKassamA.2012.No-tillfarmingandtheenvironment:Dono-tillsystemsrequiremorechemicals?

Outlooksonpestmanagement.August2012. http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/CA-Publications/outlook_Pestidices_No_till_and_inputs.pdf15 Ibid.16 GianessiL.2014.ImportanceofherbicidesforconservationagricultureinSub-SaharanAfrica.International

pesticidebenefitscasestudyNo.102.CropLifeInternational.https://croplife.org/case-study/importance-of-herbicides-for-conservation-agriculture-in-sub-saharan-africa/.

17 PercyR.,KimenyeL.,PoundB.,PhiriA.andMillsA.2013.Facilitatingscalingoutandspilloversofagriculturaltechnologiesandknowledge:StudytoinformSIMLESA.Volume1:Mainreport.Entebbe:ASARECA(AssociationforStrengtheningAgriculturalResearchinEasternandCentralAfrica).

http://www.asareca.org/sites/default/files/SIMLESA%20REPORT%20VOL%201%20PDF%20(for%20web).pdf18 NeateP.2013.Climate-smartagriculture:Successstoriesfromfarmingcommunitiesaroundtheworld.CGIAR

ResearchProgrammeonClimateChange.19 CBAN,2015.20 Ibid.21 USDA.Biotechnology:petitionsfordeterminationofnon-regulatedstatus.http://www.aphis.usda.gov/

biotechnology/petitions_table_pending.shtml.22 ReevesM.2,4-Dcorn?Badidea,andhere’swhy.27January,2012.PesticideActionNetwork. http://www.panna.org/blog/24-d-corn-bad-idea-and-heres-why.23 Loomis,D.,Guyton,K.,Grosse,Y.,ElGhissasi,F.,Bouvard,V.,Benbrahim-Tallaa,L.,Guha,N.,Mattock,H.,Straif,K.2015.

Carcinogenicityoflindane,DDT,and2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacid.LancetOncol. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(15)00081-9/fulltext24 KaskeyJ.DowlosingtoMonsantoinbattleovermodifiedsoybeans.02February,2015.Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-02/dow-losing-to-monsanto-in-battle-over-modified-

soybeans.25 MonsantoAnnualReport2014.http://www.monsanto.com/investors/documents/annual%20report/2014/2014_

monsanto_annualreport.pdf26 http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Summary_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC32871

Page 18: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

What next after a ban on glyphosate 17

27 Ishii-EitemanM.The‘Big6’driftingtoafarmnearyou.21January,2015.PesticideActionNetworkNorthAmerica. http://www.panna.org/blog/big-6-drifting-farm-near-you.28 Monsanto.2012.Petitionfordeterminationofnon-regulatedstatesforDicamba-tolerantsoybean.http://www.

aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/10_18801p.pdf.29 http://www.roundupreadyplus.com.30 KaskeyJ.DowlosingtoMonsantoinbattleovermodifiedsoybeans.02February,2015.Bloomberg.31 https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/event/default.asp?EventID=253.32 SutherlandB.Monsanto-Syngentamega-mergerwoulddrivemoredeals:RealM&A.04May2015.Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-01/monsanto-syngenta-mega-merger-would-drive-more-

deals-real-m-a.33 TerazonoE.HerbicidediversitydrivesMonsanto’sbidforSyngenta.02June2015.Financial Times.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9bcdaa3c-0604-11e5-b676-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3cTFkkUO3.34 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-farmers-fear-possible-monsanto-syngenta-deal-2015-06-07?page=2.35 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-08/monsanto-pursues-500-million-u-s-tax-cut-with-

syngenta-deal.36 AntoniouM,HabibM.E.M.,HowardC.V.,JenningsR.C.,LeifertC.,et al.2012.TeratogenicEffectsofGlyphosate-

BasedHerbicides:DivergenceofRegulatoryDecisionsfromScientificEvidence.JEnvironAnalToxicolS4:006.doi:10.4172/2161-0525.S4-006

37 FaganJ.,AntoniouM.,andRobinsonC.2014.GMOMythsandTruths:Anevidencebasedexaminationoftheclaimsmadeforthesafetyandefficacyofgeneticallymodifiedcropsandfoods.London:EarthOpenSource.

38 Antoniouet al.,2012.39 Faganet al.,2014.40 Bøh,T.,Cuhr,M.,Traavi,T.,Sande,M.,Faga,J.andPrimicerio,R.2014.Compositionaldifferencesinsoybeansonthe

market:GlyphosateaccumulatesinRoundupReadyGMsoybeans.FoodChemistry,153,pp.207–215.41 Faganet al.,2014.42 Bøhnet al.,2014.43 Faganet al.,2014.44 EsterhuizenD.2014.SouthAfricaagriculturalbiotechnologyannual.Pretoria:USDAForeignAgriculturalService.45 TappeserB.,ReichenbecherW.andTeichmannH.2014.Agronomicandenvironmentalaspectsofthecultivationof

geneticallymodifiedherbicideresistantplants.GermanFederalAgencyforNatureConservation/SwissOfficefortheEnvironment.

46 CBAN,2015.47 ACB.2012.GlyphosateinSA:Riskypesticideatlargeandunregulatedinoursoilandwater.Johannesburg:African

CentreforBiosafety. http://acbio.org.za/images/stories/dmdocuments/Roundup-Environmental-impacts-SA.pdf.48 Antoniouet al.2012.49 CBAN,2015.50 CoupeR.H.,KalkhoffS.J.,Capel,P.D.andGregoireC.2011.Fateandtransportofglyphosateand

aminomethylphosphonicacidinsurfacewatersofagriculturalbasins.Pest management science.51 IARCMonographsvolume112:Evaluationoffiveorganophosphateinsecticidesandherbicides.20March2015.

InternationalAgencyforResearchonCancer(IARC). http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/iarcnews/pdf/MonographVolume112.pdf.52 HansenM.Monsanto,Roundupandjunkscience.29/05/2015.HuffingtonPost.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

michael-hansen-phd/monsanto-roundup-and-junk-science_b_7473736.html.53 http://rt.com/news/267139-monsanto-roundup-france-ban/.54 SarichC.30,000doctorsinArgentinademandthatglyphosatebebanned.27April2015.NaturalSociety.http://

naturalsociety.com/30000-doctors-in-argentina-demand-that-glyphosate-be-banned/.55 Monsantoreinforcesdecadesofdataandregulatoryreviewsclearlydocumentsafetyofglyphosate.23March

2015.StLouis.MonsantoCompanymediaadvisory.http://news.monsanto.com/press-release/research-and-development/monsanto-reinforces-decades-data-and-regulatory-review-clearly.

56 Hansen,2014.57 VanZwanenburgP.Chemicalreactions:glyphosateandthepoliticsofchemicalsafety.13May2015.TheGuardian.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/may/13/chemical-reactions-glyphosate-and-the-politics-of-chemical-safety.

Page 19: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

18A F R I C A N C E N T R E F O R B I O D I V E R S I T Y

58 CentreforFoodSafety.Glyphosateandcancerrisk:Frequentlyaskedquestions.May2015FactSheet.http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/glyphosate-faq_64013.pdf;(accessed22/06/2015)

59 Towardsa‘transparentEFSA’?JointsubmissiontoEFSA’spublicconsultationonitstransparencypolicy.27October2014.CorporateEuropeObservatory.http://corporateeurope.org/food-and-agriculture-efsa/2014/10/towards-transparent-efsa.

60 IARCMonographsvolume112:Evaluationoffiveorganophosphateinsecticidesandherbicides.20March2015.InternationalAgencyforResearchonCancer(IARC).

61 Thesignatorieswere:NaturalResourcesDefenseCouncil(NDRC),CentreforBiologicalDiversity,CentreforFoodSafety,FoodandWaterWatch,FriendsoftheEarthEurope,FriendsoftheEarthUS,PesticideActionNetworkNorthAmerica,PesticideActionUK,ToxicFreeNorthCarolina.

62 GroupsurgeWHOtosetsafetystandardsforherbicideglyphosateitclassifiedascarcinogenic.16thJune2015.PressreleasebyNaturalResourcesDefenseCouncil(NDRC).http://www.nrdc.org/media/2015/150616a.asp;(accessed23/06/2015).

63 http://www.globalagriculture.org/report-topics/about-the-iaastd-report/about-iaastd.html;(Accessed12/06/2015).

64 DeSchutterO.2010.ReportsubmittedbytheSpecialRapporteurontherighttofood.A/HRD/16/49.UnitedNationsHumanRightsCouncil,Geneva.

65 UnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD).TradeandEnvironmentReview2013:WakeUpBeforeItIsTooLate.MakeAgricultureTrulySustainableNowforFoodSecurityinaChangingClimate(UnitedNationspublicationUNCTAD/DITC/TED/2012/3,2013).

66 Thenewscienceofsustainablefoodsystems:Overcomingbarrierstosystemsreform.InternationalPanelofExpertsonSustainableFoodSystems(IPESFOOD).May2015.

Page 20: What next after a ban on glyphosate – more toxic chemicals and …acbio.org.za/.../uploads/2015/06/Glyphosate-report-2015.pdf · 2015-06-30 · What next after a ban on glyphosate

PO Box 29170, Melville 2109, South Africawww.acbio.org.za