what might an archive know

40
Elisa Beshero Bondar (Project Director), University of Pittsburgh Greensburg (@ epyllia ) Mary Erica Zimmer, The Editorial Institute, Boston University (@ athenerica ) Molly O’Donnell, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Upload: keystone-dh-2016

Post on 15-Apr-2017

109 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

-­‐-­‐Elisa  Beshero-­‐Bondar (Project  Director),University  of  Pittsburgh-­‐Greensburg  (@epyllia)

-­‐-­‐Mary  Erica  Zimmer,  The  Editorial  Institute,  Boston  University    (@athenerica)  -­‐-­‐Molly  O’Donnell,  University  of  Nevada,  Las  Vegas

http://www.digitalmitford.org/

Earlier  Editions…Henry

Ed.  Rev.  A.  G.  L’Estrange,  3  vols.,  1870

2nd series,  ed.  Henry  Chorley,  1872

Mitfordian  “Connections”?

-­‐-­‐Mitford  to  Sir  William  Elford,  3  April  1815  (ed.  L’Estrange,  vol.  1  [1870]),  p.  306

“…her  family  connections  must  render  her  disagreeable  to  Miss  Austen,  since  she  is  the  sister-­‐in-­‐law  of  a  gentleman  who  is  at  law  with  Miss  A’s  brother  forthe  greater  part  of  his  fortune.*”

“You  must  have  remarked  how  much  her  stories  hinge  upon  entailed  estates;doubtless   she  has  learned  to  dislike  entails.”

Editor’s  Note:“*  Every  other  account  of  Jane  Austen,from  whatever  quarter,   represents  her  as  handsome,  graceful,  amiable,  and  shy.”

Annotation:  Creating  Communities

• “The  annotator,  if  [s]he's  a  good  one,  presents  a  reading  that  will  create  the  acceptable  range  of  conversation  within  the  group  [s]he  supposedly  serves.”

• “This  leads  me  to  suggest  that  questions  of  annotation  always  come  back  to  issues  of  communities  and  institutions  .  .  .”

-­‐-­‐Hanna,  “Annotation  as  Social  Practice,”  184

About  Digital  Mitford

http://digitalmitford.org/about.html

Digital  Mitford

• “That  no  such  edition  yet  exists  almost  certainly  reflects  the  challenging  extent  of  a  task  that  could  not  be  completed  without  the  assistance  of  a  large  and  diversely  specialized  team  of  scholars.”

-­‐-­‐Digital  Mitford,  “Methods  and  

Practice”  (mitford.pitt.edu)

“-­‐ographies”:Digital  Mitford’s  site  index

Site  Index  entry:  Sir  William  Elford(sample:  draft  form)

Interpretive  Grounds,  via  Granularity?

– Hanna  notes  “the  fear  that  the  annotator  will  in  fact  become  an  interpreter,  impose  his  being,  in  a  double  attack,  on  the  reader  and  on  the  text.”• Hence,  “twentieth-­‐century  annotators  .  .  .  are  required  to  fragment  their  activities  into  tasks  presented  as  rhetorically  discrete,  so  they  can  never  appear  whole  consciousnesses  in  touch  with  the  text”  (Hanna  180).• Yet  “this  rhetorical  prescription  seems  .  .  .  a  way  of  allowing  annotation  to  proceed  as  a  form  of  benignmeditation,  a  service  profession,  which  it  is  not”  (181).  

Annotation-­‐>Aggregation-­‐>  Interpretation

-­‐-­‐from  The  Digital  Mitford  Coding  Guidelines,  “Contextual  Annotation”

“Known  Unknowns”:  finding  “Miss  James”

Are  You  Being  Served?• “The  annotator,  if  [s]he's  a  good  one,  presents  a  reading  that  will  create  the  acceptable  range  of  conversation  within  the  group  [s]he  supposedly  serves.”

• “This  leads  me  to  suggest  that  questions  of  annotation  always  come  back  to  issues  of  communities  and  institutions,  and  consequently  questions  of  power.”

• “At  least  one  question  one  should  ponder  at  length  .  .  .  is  precisely  that  of  power:  who  or  what  is  being  served  by  this  activity?”

-­‐-­‐Hanna,  “Annotation  as  Social  Practice,”  184

Mobilizing  Markup?

-­‐-­‐from  The  Digital  Mitford  Codebook,   “Contextual  Annotation”

Supporting  Principles  and  Praxis

Annotation  Tool:  XQuery

Editing  “Miss  James”

-­‐-­‐”Miss  James”  site  index  entry,  May  2015,  Digital  Mitford  

For  “Known  Unknowns”:  Initial  Results

For  “Unknown  Knowns”:  Annotation  as  Iteration

Byronic  Influences?

“Oh!  renowned  committeemen!  From  all  the  selected  fruits  of  all  the  poetical  costermongers  of  Great  Britain,  Ireland,  and  Berwick-­‐upon-­‐Tweed,   could  ye  choose  nothing  more  promising  than  this  green  sour  apple?  I  am  really  astonished  that  Lord  Byron  could  write  anything  sostamped  with  the  curse  of  mediocrity,  that  even  the  strong  shadow  of  Dr.  Busby  fails  to  throw  it  out  with  anything  like  effect.”

-­‐-­‐MRM  to  Sir  William  Elford,  18  October  1812

Seeking  Out  “Shakespeare”

A  Mitfordian  Model…

—MRM  site  index  entry,  May  2015,  Digital  Mitford project

…for  managing  “more.”

Recalibration,  Redux

• Re:  “what  an  annotator  is  doing”:– “My  practice  suggests  to  me  that  he  is  in  fact  creating  himself  as  reader—and  thus  creating  the  reader  of  his  work.”

– “When  my  reading  runs  into  blocks,  I  have  to  dissociate  myself  momentarily  and  become  a  researcher.”

– “But  eventually,  this  split  within  myself  is  healed,  since  I  return  to  write  in  the  most  helpful  fashion  my  reading  as  note  or  gloss  .  .  .”  

-­‐-­‐Hanna,  “Annotation  as  Social  Practice,”  181