what do beef consumers really want?osucowcamp.okstate.edu/sub_page_files/2016-accc... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
6/14/2016
1
What do Beef Consumers Really Want?
Jayson L. LuskRegents Professor and Willard Sparks Endowed Chair
Oklahoma State [email protected]
www.jaysonlusk.com@JaysonLusk
When consumers think about meat production, do they think about
this . . .
or this . . .
6/14/2016
2
An Industry Under Attack
• As if drought, feed prices, disease weren’t enough . . .
• Consider the views of the “cultural elite” on – Environment
– Health
– Animal Welfare
– Food Safety
Environment
“a holocaust of a different kind”‐Mark Bittman, cookbook and NYT
columnist, in a TED Talk, 2008
Environment
Meat has “more of an impact on the
environment than any other food we eat.”
-NPR Morning Edition, 2012
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/06/27/155527365/visualizing-a-nation-of-meat-eaters
”If you concentrate the animals, you also
concentrate their waste. . . It can pollute the water. It can also pollute the air. But the basic problem is just how much land and how many crops it takes to
produce all the meat. And when you add it up, the total impact on the planet is quite huge. A third of all the crops that people grow all across the world go to feeding animals. . . . It's one cause of deforestation,
global warming, water pollution, a lot of environmental problems.”
-Dan Charles, NPR, 2012
6/14/2016
3
Environment
“It's true that giving up that average 176 lb. of meat a year
is one of the greenest lifestyle changes you can make as an individual.”
-Bryan Walsh, TIME Magazine, Meat: Making Global Warming Worse,
2008
Health
“toxic food environment”
Health
“This study provides clear evidence that regular
consumption of red meat, especially processed meat, contributes substantially to
premature death”- Frank Hu, Professor of nutrition and epidemiology
at Harvard School of Public Health
6/14/2016
4
Health
“We can reduce saturated fats and reduce the risk of heart disease by 19 percent . . . While this is a symbolic gesture, it is asking people to think about the food choices they make.
Eating less meat can reverse some of our nation’s most common illnesses.”
- Jan Perry, Los Angeles City Councilwoman
Message Takes Hold
Message Takes Hold
6/14/2016
5
The Response
The Response
Animal Welfare
Join the Pamela Anderson pledge:I want to eat better, feel better, and stop supporting cruelty to chickens, pigs,
cows, fish, and other animals who are raised and killed for food. By signing my name, I pledge to explore veganism/vegetarianism for at least 30 days.
6/14/2016
6
In Sum
“THE industrial production of animal products is nasty business. From mad
cow, E. coli and salmonella to soil erosion, manure runoff and pink
slime, factory farming is the epitome of a broken food system.”
-James McWilliams, New York Times, 2012
Are you depressed yet?
First, some good news
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
Share of At‐Home Food Expenditures
Dairy share Beef share Pork share Poultry Share Egg Share
6/14/2016
7
First, some good news
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Billions of $
Expenditures on Beef (2014 dollars) ‐ US Food at Home
First, some good news
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
Ma
y-1
3
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3
Sep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3
De
c-13
Jan
-14
Feb
-14
Ma
r-14
Ap
r-1
4
Ma
y-1
4
Jun
-14
Jul-
14
Au
g-1
4
Sep
-14
Oct
-14
No
v-1
4
De
c-14
Jan
-15
Feb
-15
Ma
r-15
Ap
r-1
5
Ma
y-1
5
Jun
-15
Jul-
15
Au
g-1
5
Sep
-15
Oct
-15
No
v-1
5
Will
ing
nes
s-tp
-Pay
Steak Chicken Breast Hamburger
First, some good news
6/14/2016
8
First, some good news
How to respond?
• Meat production is bad – compared to what? Need to think on the margin
• Are things getting better or worse?
• Are you prepared to respond to these issues?
• How do you engage on these issues?
Meat is Big Business
• People spend more on meat than any other food category the problems will look large because
the industry is large
US produced 24.4 billion lbs of beef in 2014 (54 lbs per person)
6/14/2016
9
Evolution of the Industry
• Fewer, more productive cows
0.6 cows/person in 1975; Today, its only 0.3 (100% reduction!)
In 1975, 179 lbs/cow ; today, the figure is 288 lbs/cow. We’re getting 109 lbs more from each cow!
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
1000s of lbs of beef produced per cow
cows per person
1000s of lbs of beef produced per cow
Evolution of the Industry
• Consumers pay lower prices
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
cents per dozen (eggs)
$ / cwt (cattle, hogs)
cattle hogs eggs
Environmental Impacts
• Fewer, more efficient animals (at least per capita) means fewer greenhouse gasses, less land use, and possibly reduced environmental impacts
6/14/2016
10
Environmental Impacts
1977 2007 % changeAnimals Supporting population (1000s) 9,106 6,243 ‐45.9%Stockers (1000s) 2,896 1,767 ‐63.9%Feedlot animals (1000s) 2,776 2,322 ‐19.6%Cull animals (1000s) 941 523 ‐79.9%Total animals slaughtered (1000s) 3,656 2,831 ‐29.1%Total population (1000s) 14,778 10,332 ‐43.0%Nutrition resources Total energy requirement, MJ × 106 251,090 230,898 ‐8.7%Feedstuffs, kg × 106 72,883 59,320 ‐22.9%Land, ha (1000s) 9,116 6,106 ‐49.3%Water, L × 109 2,006 1,763 ‐13.8%Fossil fuel energy, BTU × 109 9,996 9,139 ‐9.4%Waste output Manure, kg (millions) 50,636 41,076 ‐23.3%N excretion, kg (1000s) 500,162 438,858 ‐14.0%P excretion, kg (1000s) 48,055 43,088 ‐11.5%Greenhouse gas emissions CH4, kg (1000s) 680,995 553,978 ‐22.9%N2O,5 kg (1000s) 9,157 8,153 ‐12.3%C footprint,6 kg of CO2 (millions) 21,445 17,945 ‐19.5%
To produce 1 billion kg beef . . .
Source: Capper, Journal of Animal Science, 2011
Environmental Impacts
• Meat and climate change– Dr. Henning Steinfeld, UN FAO: the meat industry is
“one of the most significant contributors to today’s most serious environmental problems” and that “urgent action is required to remedy the situation.”
– livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions
• BUT . . .– Frank Mitloehner has shown the FAO report
overestimates livestock impacts (a fact they admit)
– EPA estimated all agriculture only responsible for 8% of emissions (livestock is 3%)
Caloric Efficiency
• A lot of focus energy (or corn) used to product a pound of beef− “respected environmental scientists have
pointed out the tremendous inefficiencies and resulting costs to our planet of animal agriculture. For example, animals consume more protein than they produce. For every kilogram (2.2 pounds) of animal protein produced, animals consume an average of almost 6 kilograms . . . of plant protein from grains and forage.”(Francione 2004)
6/14/2016
11
Caloric Efficiency
− “Although crops used for animal feed ultimately produce human food in the form of meat and dairy products, they do so with a substantial loss of caloric efficiency. If current crop production used for animal feed and other nonfood uses (including biofuels) were targeted for direct consumption, ~70% more calories would become available, potentially providing enough calories to meet the basic needs of an additional 4 billion people”West et al.,
Science 2014)
− Do we consistently apply this to other industries? Should we?
An Analogy
• A food producing machine
An Analogy
• A food producing machine
6/14/2016
12
Caloric Efficiency
• Inaccurate assumptions− people can eat grass
− people will gladly eat efficiently produced grains (corn and soy) directly
− there are tasty-edible crops that can be widely grown instead of corn and soy which can produce human calories as efficiently as corn and soy
Caloric Efficiency
• It is improper to only look at amount of energy (or crops) expended to get beef, pork, or poultry – We also have to look at what we get in return
– Most people really like the taste of meat (and won’t eat grass or forage)
• Almost no one looks at their iPad and asks, "how much more energy went into producing this than my old Apple II.”– The iPad is so much better than the Apple II.
– We'd be willing to accept more energy use to have a better computer
– Likewise a nice T-bone is so much better than a head of broccoli. I'm willing to accept more energy use to have a T-bone than a head of broccoli
Caloric Efficiency
• Let’s compare across foods
Costs 0.4¢ to produce 1 kcal energyCosts 6.9¢ to produce 1 gram protein
Costs 0.1¢ to produce 1 kcal energyCosts 1.7¢ to produce 1 gram protein
Costs 4.24 times more to produce 1 kcal energy from lettuce than beefCosts 3.95 times more to produce 1 gram protein from lettuce than beef
6/14/2016
13
Environmental Impacts
“Let us also not gloss over what is beef's most obvious benefit: Livestock take inedible grasses and untasty grains and convert them into a protein-packed food most humans love to eat. We may be able to reduce our impact on the environment by eating less meat, but we can also do the same by using science to make livestock more productive and environmentally friendly.”
Health and Meat
• Red meat eating is correlated with some bad health outcomes− Correlation ≠ causation
− Heavier meat eaters tend to− be men, less educated, less physically active,
heavier smokers, heavier beer drinkers, and eat fewer fruits and veggies
− “Except for diabetes, [cardio vascular disease] risk factors have declined considerably over the past 40 years in all [body mass index] groups.” - Gregg et al. JAMA, 2005
Health and Meat
Scien fic Certainty ≠ Size of Risk
Ed Yong, The Atlantic:
6/14/2016
14
Health and Meat
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
Per‐Cap
ita Beef Consumption (lbs/person)
Average
Body Weight 40
‐49 year olds (lbs)
Body Weight
Beef Consumption
What to Do?
Source: OSU Food Demand Survey (FooDS)
What consumers know
6/14/2016
15
What about hormone use?− Estrogen content of different foods
Implanted = 10 ngNon‐implanted = 7 ng
Source: Stewart. “Implanting Beef Cattle.” University of Georgia Cooperative Extension . Bulletin 1302, Feb. 2010.
908,000 ng10,896 ng ??
What consumers know
What consumers know
What consumers knowPrime Choice Select
Fat Content% indicated grade is leanest 57.1% 19.3% 23.6%% giving with correct ranking 14.4%
Juiciness% indicated grade is juiciest 55.6% 24.6% 19.8% % giving with correct ranking 32.6%
Source: OSU Food Demand Survey (FooDS), Journal of Animal Science
Prime Choice SelectQuality Grade Test% indicated picture is Prime 22.5% 24.0% 53.5% % indicated picture is Choice 23.0% 54.6% 22.4% % indicated picture is Select 54.4% 21.4% 24.2%% giving with correct ranking 14.5%
Price Test% indicated picture is $4/lb 54.8% 9.9% 35.3% % indicated picture is $8/lb 16.0% 68.8% 15.2% % indicated picture is $12/lb 29.2% 21.3% 49.5% % giving with correct ranking 24.4%
6/14/2016
16
What Consumers Want
What Consumers Are Willing to Trade
47%
10%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Cost of Food (% of income)
Cost of Food
Worse Tasting Better TastingFood Food
37%
80
60
50
60
70
80
90
Age
Life Expectancy
Worse Tasting Better TastingFood Food
20 years
1.0
3.5
0
1
2
3
4
Number of Foodborne Illnesses
Food Borne Illness
Worse Tasting Better TastingFood Food
2.5 sick‐nesses
Source: OSU Food Demand Survey (FooDS), November 2015
Will people pay what they say?
• Pay attention to what people do, not what they say
• Avoid unfunded mandates
MilkBacon
6/14/2016
17
Customers not Enemies
• Not helpful to bemoan “lack of knowledge” or “connection to agriculture”
• Sometimes you have to change because that’s what your customer wants
• The good news is that people want to know more about how food is produced− An opportunity!
Understand the Consumer
• Easy to demonize people you don’t know
• Risks seem greater when you can’t see the benefits
• Risks perceived as “uncontrollable” are more threatening
• Science and statistics often aren’t as persuasive as stories
So . . .
• Rethink your job duties
• Get in the game – tell your story
• Defend without being defensive
• Create shared values
• Talk about tangible benefits of technology to you
• Make tradeoffs salient and available higher prices, more hunger, more imports vs. less technology
advocate policies that expand the size of the pie
6/14/2016
18
How?
• Adopt a blogger
• Give tours to schools and media
• Social media
• Write an editorial
• Visit a college or university Example food classes at Harvard in 2013
Food writing (JOUR S-170) Gender, Food and Culture in American History Freshman Seminar 25k – You Are What you Eat History and Politics of the American Obesity Epidemic Food Law and Policy From Farm to Fork: Why What You Eat Matters
It works
• NYT Food for Tomorrow conference in Nov 2014• Bittman started by saying: “There is a war here!” . . . the
current food system “pollutes, sickens, exploits, and robs.”
• But USFRA hosted a session where
• Illinois hog farmer Julie Maschhoff said “I grew up on a corporate farm, and my grandfather had a corporate farm before it was bad.” She talked about her farm, biotechnology, and foodie friends
• Nebraska cattle producer Joan Ruskamp said, "Please let us be involved in the conversation about food!" She added, "I don't want it to be a war."
• By the end, Bittman’s tone change. He said, “We’ve learned that everyone wants to be sustainable . . . We all want the same thing” and "We have much more in common than not."
My take
• Need an optimistic, forward looking vision for the future of food