welcome to the 6th annual leadership academy administrator roles for increased rigor in instruction...
TRANSCRIPT
Welcometo the
6th Annual Leadership Academy
Administrator Roles for
Increased Rigor in Instruction
We hope you enjoy the day!
What is the message?
• If your plan is for a year, plant rice. If your plan is for a decade, plant trees. If our plan is for a lifetime, educate children.
- Confucius
Agenda
Moral Imperative for Standards
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Reading Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Math Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Science Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-1130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MEAP Social Studies Proficiency (all grades)
Region
State
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Math Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Reading Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Science Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Social Studies Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2007 2008 2009 2010 201130
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MME Writing Proficiency
RegionState
Test Year
% p
rofi
cien
t
2010 MEAP READINGLevel vs. % Correct 2010 (2009)
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct (2009)
Word Study Narrative TextInformational
TextComprehension
1 4109 88 86 83 86
2 4253 65 64 56 64
3 773 39 37 32 37
4 273 27 23 21 24
2010 MEAP MATH:Levels vs. % Correct 2010 (2009)
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct (2009)
FP 1 FP 2 FP 3 FP 4 FP 5 FP 6 FP 7
1 4351 73 72 66 64 66 66 65
2 3934 46 48 42 40 42 43 43
3 1000 27 31 30 26 26 22 29
4 114 15 21 21 19 18 8 18
2010 MEAP Science: Levels vs. % Correct
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct
Processes Physical Science Life Science Earth Science
1 1373 82 73 78 76
2 1418 61 50 57 53
3 360 37 33 39 34
4 88 24 20 26 24
2010 MEAP Social Studies: Levels vs. % Correct
Performance Level Count
Fall 2010 % Correct
Historical Geographic Civics Economic
1 1429 71 78 80 74
2 1349 51 56 61 54
3 426 34 38 35 30
4 96 22 24 23 20
“..stop lying to parents about how well their children are prepared for the challenges of
living and working in the 21st century.”
Becoming a Leader in Education: An Agenda for Michigan
Impact of New Cut Scores (proposed)
Grade
Reading Math
% Proficient Old
% Proficient New
% Proficient Old
% Proficient New
3 92% 51% 98% 33%
4 88% 49% 92% 33%
5 89% 55% 81% 39%
6 90% 52% 86% 30%
7 86% 49% 88% 34%
8 88% 47% 85% 44%
11 72% 44% 57% 36%
Boehm Kindergarten Readiness
Year % of students “ready”(at level 1 or 2)
2010 52
2011 57
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 3rd 4th 5th20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AIMSweb Spring: % of Students Above Target
2010
2011
% o
f st
uden
ts
R-CBM MAZEPSF
2009 2010 20110%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
College Readiness Indicators% of students meeting all EPAS CRBs
Explore (8th)
Plan (10th)
ACT (11th)
Linear (ACT (11th))
ACT Performance (11th grade MME)Graduation Cohort ACT Composite % meeting all 4 CRB
2008 19.36 13.31
2009 19.43 16.56
2010 19.69 16.75
2011 20.10 18.73
2012 20.32 20.41
2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Work-Keys% of students scoring level 5 (or above)
on Applied Math & Reading
Test Year
% o
f st
ud
ents
Next Generation Assessments:21st Century Skills (right now!)
• Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
• Collaboration Across Networks• Agility and Adaptability• Initiative/Entrepreneurship• Oral and Written
communication• Accessing and Analyzing
information• Curiosity and Imagination
College and Work Readiness Assessment (CWRA)
• Critical thinking• Problem Solving• Written Expression• Writing Mechanics• 90 minute
constructed response• Fixed
references/resources
CWRA – Regional Results
CWRA-Writing
CWRA: Analysis and Problem Solving
Where do we go from here?• How have we improved?
– More deliberate assessment calendar;
– More commonality;– Increased participation;– More PD related to assessment:– Improved data management;– Improved access to information;
• What needs to be developed?– Time to analyze;– An instructional response!
“Will the circle be unbroken?”
Curriculum
Assessment
Instruction
Will it impact our lesson plans?
Who needs the most help?
– Cindy: 97– Bobby: 85– Jan: 56– Peter: 82– Marcia: 100– Greg: 91
Do we know what our assessments expect of students?
• “What Do Our Assessments Measure?”
• Samples
Carpe Diem the CCSS!
• Interested Students
• Energized Teachers
• Exceptional Future
• If…
4 Requirements of Effective Instructional Leadership
Ensure that all personal are engaged in CCSS implementation through rigorous lesson design;
Provide high quality professional development and support;
Monitor progress toward implementation through walkthroughs, meetings, feedback, etc;
Publicly communicate your status in implementing the CCSS to your stakeholders monthly.