WELCOME TO ASSESSING A SKILL OR PERFORMANCE

FOL Part 1 2012

Sandy Odrowski

Durham College

AGENDA1. Getting started

Welcome and session outcomes

Story Time (Connection Activity)

Identifying best assessment practices

2. Reviewing key concepts (Content Activity)

What, Why, How, When and Who of Performance Assessment

3. Exploring – small group work (Practice Activity)

Creating, administering and evaluating checklists, grading scales and rubrics

4. Summarizing and sharing (Summary Activity)

SESSION OUTCOMES During this workshop you will identify tools that can be used

with performance assessments,

Distinguish between rubrics, checklists and rating scales,

explore and share tips to guide the assessment of performances.

STORY TIMEONCE UPON A TIME…

WILMA AND BETTY HAD DIFFERENT CLINICIANS

ASSESSING THEIR PERFORMANCE

WILMA ROCKS

5/5

BETTY DIDN’T DO SO WELL

Wilma was very surprised! They compared impressions…

3/5

Wilma gave Betty some advice…

BETTY PHONED THE DEAN!

BARNEY WAS IN BIG TROUBLE…..

Acknowledgement

ASSESSING A SKILL OR PERFORMANCE

THINK PAIR SHARE

On your own think of an assessment method (for a practical skill) you have used with students or that you have encountered in your past that left you feeling satisfied with the outcome.

Record on the paper provided

1 minute

THINK PAIR SHARE

Pair with a person beside you and share your answer.

Be sure to include WHY you found it a valuable assessment tool

2 minutes

GROUP BRAINSTORMING EXERCISE

In your group

Further discuss what you believe are characteristics of “best assessment practices” and record individually on post-it notes provided

When you are finished, place post it notes on the flip chart provided at the front of the class

5 minutes

WHAT DID YOU COME UP WITH?

Brilliant!

HOW HAVE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES CHANGED?

THE WAY WE WERE!

Knowledge in the hands of the experts (Behaviorist paradigm)

Teacher - centered Focus on assessment of

discrete, isolated knowledge and skills

Traditional f-2-f delivery Norm-referenced testing Emphasis on summative

assessments Limited perspectives (e.g.

teacher) Product based

THE WAY WE ARE! Knowledge collaboration,

cooperation and community (Constructivist paradigm)

Immersive environments - Learning IN Technology - learning anytime any where – distributive learning

Student centered – outcome based (complex, integrated learning)real-world context

Criterion-referenced Assessment as learning

(Formative) Multiple perspectives (self, peer,

teacher) Product and process based

(authentic assessments)

REVIEWING KEY CONCEPTS DEFINITIONS

Turn to page 8 of your handout. Complete the mix and match

with a partner Assessment

Evaluation

Performance/Authentic Assessment

Validity

Reliability

Assessment Task Attributes

Learning Outcome

Diagnostic, Summative and Formative Evaluation

Rubric

Performance Scale

Performance Check list

Performance criteria (descriptors)

5 minutes

ANSWERS!

WHAT IS PERFORMANCE/AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT?

Performance Assessment – close proximity to “actual criterion situation”. Usually measures complex skills, cognitive processes and communication important in real world (contextualized tasks) (Palm, 2008).

Authentic Assessments –defining features are the specific cognitive processes (disciplined inquiry) and products (knowledge beyond the mere reproduction of presented knowledge) considered important in the perspective of life beyond school (Newman & Archibald, 1992).

HTTP://JOLT.MERLOT.ORG/DOCUMENTS/VOL1_NO1_MUELLER_001.PDF

DEFINITION FOR TODAY

Performance assessment, also known as alternative or authentic assessment, is a form of testing that requires students to perform a real life task rather than select an answer from a ready-made list.

HTTP://ABCRESOURCE.LOYALISTCOLLEGE.CA/LEARNINGASSESSMENT.HTM#PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT VS. EVALUATION

Lots of controversy/confusion over these terms

Definitions

Assessment = feedback on practice; supports learning but may or may not generate marks/grades

Evaluation= summary measurement providing some kind of grade/mark/final feedback

WHY AND WHEN? THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT:

ASSESSMENT FOR, AS AND OF LEARNING (EARL, 2003)

Assessment FOR Learning

Assessment AS Learning

Assessment OF Learning

Diagnostic (before) Formative (during) Summative (after)Identifies level of knowledge and skill prior to instruction

Provides feedback aimed at understanding expected learning and improving performance

Summarizes student attainment of expected learning

Enables instruction to adapt to learner needs (individualized)

Self and peer assessment are a key component (multiple perspectives)

Conducted at the end of the instructional period e.g. determination of final grade

Enables focus on required instruction (efficient)

Motivates student to improved performance (Crooks, 2001)

Test scores and grades monitor learning but do little to motivate learning (Huba & Freed, 2000)

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY

Validity

Validity refers to the degree to which an assessment measures the intended learning outcome.

i.e. Does the test measure what it is intended to measure? (the learning outcome?)

Reliability

Reliability refers to the consistency of test scores. Reliability affected by testing conditions, rater variability.

i.e. Does the test produce consistent results?

…IS VALID AND RELIABLE

Measures what it is supposed to measure (valid)

Measures the same information consistently (reliable)

Recognizes that some aspects of learning are hard to measure or may be unplanned

WHO IS THE “ASSESSOR”?

Multiple perspectives

Self

Peer

Teacher

SELECTING AN ASSESSMENT TOOL

Assessment Tool

Attributes Sample

Checklist • the least complex form of scoring• looking for the presence/absence

of specific elements in the product of a performance

Rating Scale • unlike the typical checklist, it allows for attaching quality to elements in the process or product

• ratings can be numeric or descriptive

Rubric • multiple criteria are applied to the assessment

• quality of the performance & product are typically transparent in the assessment criteria

• appropriate for complex tasks rather than discrete activities

CHECKLIST

SAMPLE PERFORMANCE/RATING SCALE

Participates in group problem solving:

4 (Outstanding)

3 (Satisfactory)

2 (Tolerable)

1 (Unsatisfactory)

SAMPLE RUBRIC

SELECTING THE PERFORMANCE/SKILL TASK

Assessment task (performance, product or process) determined to reflect learning outcome.

Assessment task attributes – essential elements or characteristics of a good performance of an assessment task

Performance criteria (descriptors) – specific behavioral descriptions of performance at each level of performance

PARTS OF A RUBRIC

Assessment task attribute

Descriptors

GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Assessment taskGroup#1

• Checklist

• Rating Scale

Group#2

• Checklist

• Rating Scale

Group#3

• Rubric

Group#4

• Rubric

Group#5

• Checklist

• Rating Scale

Group#6

• Rubric

Group#7

• Checklist

• Rating Scale

Group#8

• Rubric

Page 6

LEARNING ACTIVITY: COLLABORATIVELY CREATE,

ADMINISTER AND EVALUATE A PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

TOOL.

Assign group roles as follows:

Performance expert _________________

Student ___________________________

Peer (reporter)_____________________

Teacher (timekeeper)________________

Page 6

INSTRUCTIONS In consultation with the performance expert,

determine performance attributes and criteria (what you feel is essential to achieve the learning outcome) for the identified task.

Learning Outcome: Accurately measure and report a radial pulse.

OR

Learning Outcome: Design, construct and fly a paper airplane.

COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING STEPS

In consultation with the performance expert, determine performance attributes and criteria (what you feel is essential to achieve the learning outcome) for the identified task.

Collaboratively develop the assessment tool (checklist, rating scale or rubric) using template provided.

The performance expert instructs the student on the performance task using the assessment tool as a guide.

The student completes a “return demonstration” of the performance task.

STEPS CONTINUED

The teacher and peer complete the developed assessment tool based on the observed student’s performance. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the developed assessment tool from a variety of perspectives (student, peer and teacher). You can record on your handout. Be prepared to share your group’s finding with the larger group.

YOUR FINDINGS

Assessment Advantages Disadvantages

Checklists

Performance Scales

Rubrics

FINAL TIPS

Review the learning outcome and purpose of the assessment tool (validity)

Collect samples of student work that exemplify levels of performance (validity)

Consult with experts in fields to develop “authentic performance tests” and to validate task attributes and performance descriptors (validity, authenticity)

Develop performance scoring instruments collaboratively with colleagues

FINAL TIPS CONTINUED

Gather multiple perspectives on scoring of same performance (rater reliability)

Share scoring rubric with students in advance of the performance task (equity, transparency, accountability)

Share performance exemplars (sample projects, assignments, video depictions) with students in advance of performance task (transparency, accountability)

Be prepared to review and revise assessment tool (accountability, validity)

A CHECKLIST FOR CHOOSING PERFORMANCE TASKS

Adapted from Checklist for Choosing Performance Assessment Tasks. Algonquin College, Professors Resource Site

Yes

No

Does the task match the expected learning (learning outcome or course learning requirement)?

Does the task adequately represent and elicit the content and skills you expect the student to attain?

Does the task enable students to demonstrate their capabilities and progress?

Does the assessment use “authentic”, real world tasks?

Does the task require the learner to integrate their learning?

Can the task be structured to provide a measure of several outcomes?

Does the task match an important outcome which reflects complex thinking skills?

Does the task pose an enduring problem type-- the type the learner is likely to encounter in the future?

Is the task fair and free of bias?

Will the task be seen as meaningful by important stakeholders?

Will the task be meaningful and engaging to students so that they will be motivated to show their capabilities?

IN CONCLUSION

Did we achieve the learning outcomes of this session?

identify tools that can be used with performance assessments,

Distinguish between rubrics, checklists and rating scales,

explore and share tips to guide the assessment of Performances.