week 13 thursday (4/7) - purdue engineering · 8:40 courtney mcmanus pm 1 8:45 devon parkos aero 2...
TRANSCRIPT
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Today’s Schedule
Turn in Final Report!!!
Group Roll Call
Section 2 Presents
C. McManus Project Manager 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
4/7/2011
8:40 Courtney McManus PM
1 8:45 Devon Parkos Aero
2 8:51 Trey Fortunato Att/Con
3 8:57 Chris Luken Att/Con
4 9:03 Justin Axsom Comm
5 9:09 Tony D'Mello Comm
BREAK for 1 hour (meet downstairs)
6 10:35 Sonia Teran MisDes
7 10:41 Evan Helmeid MisDes
8 10:47 Graham Johnson MisDes
9 10:53 Matthew Hill Power
BREAK
10 11:10 Alex Park Power
11 11:16 Joel Lau Power
12 11:22 Kyle Svejcar Prop
13 11:28 Jillian Roberts HF
BREAK
14 11:45 Brendon White HF
15 11:51 Leonard Jackson StrcThrm
16 11:57 Alex Kreul StrcThrm
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Courtney McManus
450 Presentation – Week 9
Project Manager Schedule, Logistics, CDR preparation
Mass to Ceres cost analysis
Rapid Cost Assessment
Advanced Mission Cost Model
Top-Level Risk Analysis
Event trees and Fault Trees by mission phase
Future work Finalize cost model
Complete risk analysis (include quiescent ops)
Organize final report
4/7/2011 McManus, Courtney Project Manager
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Final Cost Estimate
4/7/2011 McManus, Courtney Project Manager
* Measured in year 2011 dollars
Total Cost: $172.7 Billion USD*
Cost/Kilogram (dry mass) = $ 0.66 Million USD
$15.66 Billion USD per year
$136.3 Million USD/page of the report
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Risk Analysis
4/7/2011 McManus, Courtney Project Manager
Mission Success Probability*:
91.6%
* Probability is only Loss of Crew
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Devon Parkos AAE 450: Week 13 Presentations Aerodynamics Group, CTV Group, Capsule Group, Launch
Vehicle Group
Tasks Accomplished:
Finalize CTV and Capsule trajectories
Finalize CTV and Capsule heat shield sizing
Finalize CTV and Capsule tether coating sizing
Parkos, Devon Aerodynamics 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 CTV Trajectories
Parkos, Devon Aerodynamics
Assumptions • CD,HS = 0.025
• CD,B = 1.37
• CL,B = 0.11
• AHS = 60.8 m2
• AB,EFF = 75,200 m2
• ± 2.5σ Uncertainty
• v∞ = 7.89 km/s
Without Heat Shields
• mCTV = 123.7 t
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 CTV Trajectories
Parkos, Devon Aerodynamics
Max Values
a = 9.10 g’s
Δv1 = 3.75 km/s
Δt = 7.40 days
Without Structure
mHS = 327 kg
VHS = 0.64 m3
Ballute System
mB = 2350 kg
mTETH = 990 kg
Success Rate
98.8%
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Capsule Trajectories
Parkos, Devon Aerodynamics
Assumptions • CD,HS = 0.025
• CD,B = 1.37
• CD,PAR = 0.75
• CL,CAP = 0.42
• CL,B = 0.11
• AHS = 25.0 m2
• AB,EFF = 5800 m2
• APAR = 2350 m2
• ± 2.5σ Uncertainty
• v∞ = 7.89 km/s
Without Heat Shields
• mCAP = 9.56 t
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Capsule Trajectories
Parkos, Devon Aerodynamics
Max Values
a = 9.05 g’s
Δv1 = 3.75 km/s
Δt = 7.58 days
Without Structure
mHS = 19.2 kg
VHS = 0.038 m3
Ballute System
mB = 181.4 kg
mTETH = 75.9 kg
Success Rate
98.8%
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
AAE 450: Week 12
Fortunato, Trey (ADCS Lead, CTV Lead, Graphic Design) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
Tasks:
Finalized Spin Values
IonRail Error and Feasibility Analysis
Possible New CTV Configuration
IonRail Movie
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Attitude Determination and Control Systems Fortunato, Trey
CTV IonRail:
Burn Arc Half Angle 90 deg
Total Rotation in Orbit 164.0 deg
Transfer Time 1.38 yrs
Max Turn Per ½ Revolution 4.34 µrad
Wobble Angle 0.46 µrad
Total Propellant Loss 7.8 g
Spin Axis
H A_B ΔH
A_B
Δψ
F _z
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Fortunato, Trey
CTV A-Grav:
Attitude Determination and Control Systems
1 Kwan is 84.983 meters, the
necessary radius to achieve
Martian gravity at 2 rpm.
Parameter Value Unit
Tether Length 178.84 m
Tether Length 2.1 Kwan
Tether Diameter 4.7 cm
Tether Mass 918.2 kg
Parameter Outbound
Spin-Up
Outbound
De-Spin
Return
Spin-Up
Return
De-Spin
Unit
Maneuver Time 2195 2014 1298 1087 s
0.609 0.559 0.361 0.302 hr
Propellant Mass 381.62 375.6 324.1 288.7 kg
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
Analysis Characteristics Outbound Return Units
Transverse Inertia 7.248x108 1.029x109 [kg-m2]
Axial Inertia 3.876x106 1.455x106 [kg-m2]
Vehicle Mass 333,078 189,107 [kg]
Attitude Thrust 100 [N]
Outbound Transfer Trajectory Return Transfer Trajectory
Trajectories by: Trieste Signorino
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
ω = 2 rpm
Jupiter
Sun Gravitational Moment about the Spin Axis at Ceres
Outbound Torques
Sun, [AU] Max Torque, [kNm]
1 42.7
2.658 2.27
Return Torques
2.766 2.48
1.035 48.99
Required Counter-Moment Propellant Transfer Propellant Mass, [kg]
Outbound (Earth to Ceres) 1,938
Return (Ceres to Earth) 1,924
Total 3,862
Graphics by: Chris Luken
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
Environmental Source Force, [N] Outbound Propellant, [kg] Return Propellant, [kg]
Solar Radiation 9.02x10-6A(t) 34.2 33.9
Solar Wind 2.3x10-9A(t) Negligible Negligible
Micrometeorites 8x10-10A(t) Negligible Negligible
Analysis Characteristic Value Units Vehicle Mass (Outbound) 333,078 [kg]
Vehicle Mass (Return) 189,107 [kg]
Maximum Surface Area 1500 [m2]
Minimum Surface Area 500 [m2]
kelm 2 --
fo 1353 [W/m2]
c 3x108 [m/s]
ρa (3 AU) 2.44x10-18 [kg/m3]
Va (3 AU) 17.98x103 [m/s]
Graphic by: Chris Luken
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
Ceres
Earth
Sun
Major Turning Maneuvers
CATIA Models by: Alex Roth
Ceres Operations
Configuration
Maneuver Angle, [deg] Propellant, [kg]
Earth Departure Re-Orientation 94.4 27.18
Heliocentric Transfer Re-
Orientation 96.5 12.76
Ceres Arrival Re-Orientation 98.4 12.09
Ceres Operations General Stabilization 1290.7
Ceres Return Kick Re-
Orientation 94.4 7.43
Heliocentric Transfer Re-
Orientation 82.9 13.79
Earth Aerocapture Re-
Orientation 79.0 5.38
Total Propellant Required 1369.33
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Luken, Chris (Web Developer) Attitude Determination and Control Systems
Outbound, [kg] Ceres Operations, [kg] Return, [kg]
Propellant Requirements
Environmental Torques 1,973 -- 1,958
Spin-up/De-spin Events 758 -- 613
Re-orientation Maneuvers 53 -- 26.6
Ceres Operations 78.5 551 50.1
Total Propellant 2,863 551 2,649
Attitude Hardware
Attitude Thrusters 5.6 5.6 5.6
Alternate Control Devices 64 64 64
Total Attitude Hardware 69.6 69.6 69.6
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Justin Axsom
Communication
Group Lead
Human Launch Vehicle
Crew Transfer Vehicle
Earth Decent/Reentry Vehicle
Communication Satellites
Optical System Logistics
Axsom, Justin Communication 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Optical vs. RF Tradeoff
Axsom, Justin Communication
Justin
Axsom
• Used the upper bound of the Ka band at 40 GHz
• Iterated to find a ballpark solution for the furthest link
• 9 HDTV signals, ~5.98x108 km
• Ceres Orbiting Halo Satellites
• Earth – Trailing Relay Satellite
Mass, kg Power, kW Dr, m Dt, m Volume, m3
RF 387 150 15.0 11.0 331
Optical 124 37.0 4.00 0.20 9.62
Table 1: Optical and RF comparison
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Optical vs. RF Tradeoff Continued
Axsom, Justin Communication
• The table summarizes only 1 link
• Could not find a solution to converge for the optical power of 37 kW
• Radiator adds mass for optical (~0.5 T worst case scenario), but
significantly saves on power and volume
• To reduce dish size comparable to optical, need 3.9 MW of power!
Mass, kg Power, kW Dr, m Dt, m Volume, m3
RF 387 150 15.0 11.0 331
RF (smaller dish size) 35.8 3900 4.00 4.00 2.60
Optical 124 37.0 4.00 0.20 9.62
Table 2: Optical and RF comparison
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Tony D’Mello
AAE 450: Week 13 Presentations Communications Overview
Rover <-> Communications Satellites
Crew Communication Tools
D’Mello, Tony Communications 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Using university
dishes as ground
stations
Ground stations
send RF signal to
Earth Orbiting
Satellites (EOS)
EOS send optical
signal out to
Ceres
Communications: Earth Focused
D’Mello, Tony Communications
36,000 km
To HOS
or ETRS
EOS
EOS
EOS
Ground
Station
Ground
Station
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
*Note: images not to scale
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Blackouts
D’Mello, Tony Communications
Distance from Sun (km)
Dis
tance
from
Sun(k
m)
x108
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 4 5
x108
30
30
Blackout when
Ceres is in
conjunction with
the Earth
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
*Note: images not to scale
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Blackout when
Ceres is in
opposition with
the Earth
Blackouts
D’Mello, Tony Communications
Distance from Sun (km)
Dis
tance
from
Sun(k
m)
x108
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 4 5
x108
30
30
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
*Note: images not to scale
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Communications: Intermediate
D’Mello, Tony Communications
Distance from Sun (km)
Dis
tance
from
Sun(k
m)
x108
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 4 5
x108 Optical signal can
be sent directly to
Halo Orbiting
Satellites (HOS)
Signal sent to
Earth Trailing
Relay Satellite
(ETRS)
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
ETRS model by : Alex Roth
*Note: images not to scale
Max Dist: 5.6e8 km
Max Dist: 2.1e8 km + 5.6e8 km
= 7.7e8 km
EOS
HOS
ETRS
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
HOS sends
optical signal to
CTV
CTV sends RF
signal to ISPP
station
ISPP sends signal
to harvesters
Communications: HOS-CTV-ISPP
Communications
CTV
ISPP Station Harvesters
HOS
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
Models by : Alex Roth
*Note: images not to scale D’Mello, Tony
From EOS
or ETRS
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
HOS sends RF
signal to other
HOS
HOS sends RF
signal to ISPP
station
ISPP sends signal
to harvesters
Communications: HOS-ISPP
D’Mello, Tony Communications
From EOS
or ETRS
ISPP Station Harvesters
HOS HOS
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
Models by : Alex Roth
*Note: images not to scale 4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
HOS sends RF
signals to each
rover
Rovers send RF
signals to one
receiver on HOS
Communications: HOS-Rover
Communications
HOS
Rover 1 Rover 2 Rescue Rover
D’Mello, Tony
Figure created by: Tony D’Mello
Models by : Kim Madden and Alex Roth
*Note: images not to scale
From EOS
or ETRS
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Rover and HOS RF Communication
D’Mello, Tony Communications
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3)
Transmitter 0.33 0.1 0.00043
Receiver 6.35 -- 0.012
Total 6.67 0.1 0.013
Exploration Rover 1 Communication Hardware
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3)
Transmitter 0.37 0.1 0.0012
Receiver 5.92 -- 0.026
Total 6.29 0.1 0.026
Rescue Rover Communication Hardware
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3)
Transmitter 0.67 0.1 0.00080
Receiver 16.35 -- 0.033
Total 17.02 0.1 0.034
Exploration Rover 2 Communication Hardware
Mass
(kg)
Power
(kW)
Volume
(m3)
Transmitter –
Exploration Rover 1 6.76 0.35 0.01
Transmitter –
Exploration Rover 2 16.35 0.35 0.03
Transmitter –
Rescue Rover 6.73 0.1 0.03
Receiver –
Rovers 10.13 -- 0.42
Transmitter –
Halo Satellite 8.89 9 0.01
Receiver –
Halo Satellite 8.89 -- 0.01
Total 57.75 9.8 0.51
Halo Orbiting Satellites Communication Hardware
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Crew Interface
D’Mello, Tony Communications
Ceres Orbit
Mars Orbit
Earth Orbit
C
E R
Sun
Distance (km)
Dis
tance (
km
)
x108
x1
08
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3) 2 TVs 10 0.2 0.016
4 Cell Phones 2.4 0.28 0.002 1 Antenna 1.7e-3 1.5e-3 1.94e-7
Total 12.4 0.48 0.018
Exploration Rover Communication Hardware
Crew uses cell phone-like devices and television monitors to communicate.
Phone communication is through antenna located at the ceiling in the center of the vehicle.
Television is wired.
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3) 2 TVs 10 0.2 0.016
6 Cell Phones 3.6 0.42 0.003 1 Antenna 1.7e-3 1.6e-3 1.94e-7
Total 13.6 0.64 0.019
Rescue Rover Communication Hardware
Mass
(kg) Power
(kW) Volume
(m3)
6 TVs 30 0.6 0.048
6 Cell Phones 3.6 0.42 0.003 3 Antennas 5.1e-3 6.3e-3 5.82e-7
Total 33.61 1.03 0.051
CTV Communication Hardware
4/7/2011
AAE 450
Spring 2011
36
Cepheus and Cassiopeia
Terán, Sonia Mission Design
Cassiopeia
APES 2
3.5years Consumables
ECCO 1*
ECCO 2*
Cephus
APES 1
3.5years Consumables
Castor
Pollux
SPRINT
*ECCO 1 and ECCO 2 are transferred only for interplanetary trajectory
Who’s along for the ride?
AAE 450
Spring 2011
37
Cepheus and Cassiopeia
Terán, Sonia Mission Design
Low Thrust Spiral Values
TOF
(years)
Thrust (N) Low Thrust
Power1
(MW)
mprop,LT
(T)
finert
Cepheus 1.411 25 1.225 23.04 0.529
Cassiopeia 1.466 25 1.225 23.37 0.519
Kick Values2
∆vEarth
(km/s)
∆vCeres
(km/s)
mprop,Earth
(T)
mprop,Ceres
(T)
finert Earth Kick
finert Ceres Kick
Cepheus 5.00 2.37 724.9 134.7 0.043 0.143
Cassiopeia 5.01 2.19 728.7 127.2 0.042 0.149
1 Power required only for the MPD motors 2 A 15% mass of propellant cost was added for burn arcs
How much is propellant?
AAE 450
Spring 2011
38
Cepheus and Cassiopeia
Teran, Sonia Mission Design
Should we ask for directions?
By: Sonia Teran
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Evan R. Helmeid
AAE 450: Presentations Mission Design Accomplishments:
Rescue Rover Hopping analysis Ballistic trajectory
Transfer orbit trajectory
Final Report and Appendices
Report Involvement:
Quick specs, Acronyms, Vehicle names, Propulsion sizing, Landing with STV, Landing-surface-take-off for CTV, Hohmann transfer, Rescue rover trajectories
Helmeid, Evan Mission Design
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Rescue Rover:
Trajectory based on distance
Helmeid, Evan Mission Design
Method Distance, km mpropellant, kg Total time, min
Optimal to ULCO 207.5-765.4 2155 31.33-88.87
Ballistic trajectory 7.2-207.5 319-2025 11.13-60.53
Driving 0.0-7.2 ~0 0.0-60
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Crew Transfer Vehicle:
Maneuver summary
Helmeid, Evan Mission Design
Maneuver Engine Wet mass, T Prop. mass, T Total time, min
Landing Ceres regime 169.0 14.20 12.22
ISPP transfer Ceres regime 187.3 24.24 85.66
Launch Kick engine @ 30% 465.1 46.81 468.0
0 5 10 15
x 104
0
1
2
3
4
5x 10
4
Evan Helmeid
Trajectory of Spacecraft
X-position (m)
Y-p
ositio
n (
m)
Final altitude
Final trajectory
0 200 400 600 800-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Evan Helmeid
Steering Angle, , vs Time
time (s)
Ste
ering A
ngle
,
(deg)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Evan Helmeid
Y-Velocity vs X-Velocity
Velocity x-component (m/s)
Velo
city y
-com
ponent
(m/s
)
0 200 400 600 800-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
Evan Helmeid
Velocity Components vs Time
time (s)
Velo
city (
m/s
)
Velocity: x-direction
Velocity: y-direction
0 2 4 6 8 10
x 104
0
1
2
3
4
5x 10
4
Evan Helmeid
Trajectory of Spacecraft
X-position (m)
Y-p
ositio
n (
m)
Final altitude
Final trajectory
0 100 200 300 400 500-100
-50
0
50
100
Evan Helmeid
Steering Angle, , vs Time
time (s)
Ste
ering A
ngle
,
(deg)
50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
50
100
150
200
Evan Helmeid
Y-Velocity vs X-Velocity
Velocity x-component (m/s)
Velo
city y
-com
ponent
(m/s
)
0 100 200 300 400 5000
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Evan Helmeid
Velocity Components vs Time
time (s)V
elo
city (
m/s
)
Velocity: x-direction
Velocity: y-direction
Descent
Ascent
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Supply Transfer Vehicle:
Landing summary
Helmeid, Evan Mission Design
Vehicle Engine thrust, kN Wet mass, T Prop. mass, T Total time, min
STV 1 100.0 140.1 12.82 10.65
STV 2 80.0 107.9 10.04 10.38
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
x 104
0
1
2
3
4
5x 10
4
Evan Helmeid
Trajectory of Spacecraft
X-position (m)
Y-p
ositio
n (
m)
Final altitude
Final trajectory
0 100 200 300 400 500 600-100
-50
0
50
100
Evan Helmeid
Steering Angle, , vs Time
time (s)
Ste
ering A
ngle
,
(deg)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350-150
-100
-50
0
Evan Helmeid
Y-Velocity vs X-Velocity
Velocity x-component (m/s)
Velo
city y
-com
ponent
(m/s
)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
Evan Helmeid
Velocity Components vs Time
time (s)
Velo
city (
m/s
)
Velocity: x-direction
Velocity: y-direction
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
x 104
0
1
2
3
4
5x 10
4
Evan Helmeid
Trajectory of Spacecraft
X-position (m)
Y-p
ositio
n (
m)
Final altitude
Final trajectory
0 100 200 300 400 500 600-100
-50
0
50
100
Evan Helmeid
Steering Angle, , vs Time
time (s)
Ste
ering A
ngle
,
(deg)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
Evan Helmeid
Y-Velocity vs X-Velocity
Velocity x-component (m/s)
Velo
city y
-com
ponent
(m/s
)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
Evan Helmeid
Velocity Components vs Time
time (s)
Velo
city (
m/s
)
Velocity: x-direction
Velocity: y-direction
STV 1
STV 2
AAE 450
Spring 2011 The report:
Page count summary (unofficial)
Helmeid, Evan Mission Design
Appendix # Pages
A 470
B 36
C 28
D 54
E 16
F 56
G 30
H 14
I 36
TOTAL 740
http://www.ehow.com/how_6144796_many-lines-file.html
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Mission Timeline
Johnson, Graham Mission Design
Assumptions for
model:
-Circular, Co-planar
Planetary Orbits
-Mars will not
influence trajectory
Mission Timeline
Dates: Duration(years):
Project Begins 1/1/2020 N/A
STV Launches/Construction 1/1/2020 - 1/1/2023 4
CTV Launches/Construction 2/11/2027 - 8/11/2028 1.5
STV 1 Departure 10/7/2024 1.411
STV 2 Departure 10/7/2024 1.466
STV 1 Arrival 3/6/2025 N/A
STV 2 Arrival 3/27/2025 N/A
ECCO(1,2) Dept 3/27/2025 1.856
ECCO(1,2) Arrive 2/8/2027 N/A
ISPP1 Production Complete 6/10/2027 2.256
ISPP2 Production Complete 6/30/2027 2.256
CTV Departure LEO 8/19/2028 1.38
CTV Arrival LCO 1/17/2030 N/A
Ceres Stay 1/18/2030 - 2/13/2031 392 DAYS
CTV Ceres Departure 2/13/2031 1.24
CTV Aerocapture at Earth 5/12/2031 7.58 DAYS
Capsule Aero-entry 5/18/2031
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Recap on ECCO1 and ECCO2
Johnson, Graham Mission Design
0.9995
0.9996
0.9997
0.9998
0.9999
1
1.0001
1.0002
1.0003
1.0004
1.0005
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
x 10-4
-1
0
1
2
x 10-4
Nondimensional X-Direction
Transfer Manifolds to L1 & L2
Nondimensional Y-Direction
Nondim
ensio
nal Z
-Direction
Transfer to
L1
Transfer to
L2
ΔV, km/s 0.604 0.251
mprop, kg 2897.5 1137.8
Transfer Manifold Costs
Station-keeping Costs
L1 L2
ΔV, km/s 0.2991 0.2995
mprop, kg 1246.6 1248.3 Courtesy: Christopher Spreen
•Where ΔV was calculated for a 5 year duration time.
•Perturbation force caused by Jupiter’s Influence.
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Matt Hill
Power Group/ISPP
AAE 450: Week 11 Presentations
Tasks Accomplished:
Created Images for Report Section
Completed Final Report
Mission Accomplished! (almost)
Hill, Matt Mission Power/ISPP Stations 47
AAE 450
Spring 2011
1. Reactor (without shielding) 2. Oven
3. Condensor 4. Electrolyzer
5. Stirling Engine 6. Turboalternator
7. LOX, LH2 Collection
Hill, Matt Mission Power;/ISPP Stations
Component Power Draw
(kWe)
Oven/Kiln 260
Condensor 15.1
Electrolyzer 500
RF Comms 0.05
Electronics/Sensor
s
0.5
LOX Tanks 4.2
LH2 Tanks 9.8
Water Tanks 150 (once only)
Harvester
Operations
0.026
Total 940 kWe 48
Alex Roth
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Radiation Protection Cross Section
Hill, Matt Mission Power/ISPP Stations
From center out: Core Vessel (Hafnium),
LiH, Tungsten, LiH, Boron Carbide (B4C),
Insulation
Total Shielding Thickness: 95cm
51
Matt Hill
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Using heat bled from reactor for the oven allows
us to reduce reactor yield to 2.3 MWth
52
New Revised Power Demand
Hill, Matt Mission Power/ISPP Stations
Component Power Draw (kWe)
Oven/Kiln 260 Thermal
Condensor 15.1
Electrolyzer 500
RF Comms 0.05
Electronics/Sensors 0.5
LOX Tanks 4.2
LH2 Tanks 9.8
Water Tanks 150 (once only)
Harvester Operations 0.026
Total 680 kWe, 260 kWth
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Study on reactor and radiator sizing for space
applications:
Mason, L. S. (2003). A Power Conversion Concept for
the Jupiter Icy Moons. Hanover, MD: NCIA.
Example of design selection and reactor, radiator
sizing for Mars surface:
Bushman, A., Carpenter, T., & Ellis, S. e. (2003). The
Mars Surface Reactor (MIT-NSA-TR-003). MIT.
References
Matt “The Iceman” Hill Atomic Space Prospector Extraordinaire 53
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Alex Park
Group Lead
AAE 450: Power Group
Tasks Accomplished:
- Overview/Summary
- STV Power System
- More Detailed CATIA Models
- Compilation / Appendix (Final Report)
Park, Alex Power Group
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Park, Alex Power Group
STV 1 & STV 2 Specs.
2 MW Power
Requirement
STV Masses [kg]
Reactor Core 235
Armor Mass 1954.57
Shielding 18008.7
TPV 100
Radiator 1393.33
Molten Sodium 875.72
Total 22288.5
Total Volume 318.3 m3
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Joel Lau
AAE 450: Week 13 Presentation Tasks:
Rescue Rover Power Solution
Exploration Rover Power Solution
Crew Capsule Power Solution
Groups:
Power
Rovers
Crew Capsule
Lau, Joel Power 59
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Rescue Rover Power Solution
Lau, Joel Power
Component Mass
(kg)
Volume
(m3)
TRL
10 kW Hydrogen Fuel Cell 102.04 0.17 9
3x 2092 Watt-hour
Sodium-Sulfur Batteries
41.82 0.09 6
Tanks and Fuel 7.90 0.01 9
Total Mass: 151.71 kg
Total Volume: 0.27m3
60
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Exploration Rover Power Solution
Lau, Joel Power
Component Mass
(kg)
Volume
(m3)
TRL
36 kW H2/O2 ICE 98.00 0.62 3
Electric Generator 50.00 0.17 9
3x 2092 W-hr Na-S
Batteries
41.82 0.09 6
Tanks and Propellant 312.48 0.66 9
Total Wet Mass: 502.30 kg
Total IMLEO: 223.93kg
Total Volume: 1.28 m3
61
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Rescue Rover Power Solution
Lau, Joel Power
Component Mass
(kg)
Volume
(m3)
TRL
2x 10 Kilowatt-hour
Sodium-Sulfur Batteries
41.82 0.28 6
Total Mass: 129.03kg
Total Volume: 0.28m3
62
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Kyle Svejcar
AAE 450: April 7, 2011
Technical Group: Propulsion
Vehicles: ISPP, satellites
Propulsion for ISPP harvesters
Propulsion Satellite Trailing Earth
Svejcar, Kyle Propulsion
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Earth Trailing Satellite
Svejcar, Kyle Propulsion
2 Thrusters with Thurst of 50398 N to 10079 N each
Vacuum Isp of 460 s
Expansion Ratio 150.9
Component Mass, kg Volume, m3
LH2 5116.8 --
LOX 26,300 --
2 Nozzles 233 31.7
2 LH2 tanks 60 72
2 LOX tanks 37.6 23
Pump system 29.5 --
Support Structure 33.1 --
Total 31,810 126.7
CAD model
By: Alex Roth
AAE 450
Spring 2011
ECCO 1
Svejcar, Kyle Propulsion
Thrust is 1447 N
Vacuum Isp of 330s
Expansion Ratio of 58.12
Component Mass, kg Volume, m3
MMH 756.7 --
N2O4 1650.6 --
Helium Pressurant 40.4 --
Nozzle 10.3 7.7
MMH tank 5.4 0.86
N2O4 tank 6.6 1.4
Pressurant tank 5.9 1.1
Feed system 17.0 --
Support Structure 2.8 --
Total 2495.7 11.06
By: Kyle
Svejcar
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Attitude Control
Svejcar, Kyle Propulsion
Component Mass, kg Volume, m3
H2O2 1248 --
H2O2 tank 5.1 0.73
Feed system 4.4 --
Nozzle 0.69 0.06
Support Structure 0.58 --
Total 1258.77 0.79
Vacuum Isp of 200 s
Expansion Ratio of 15.1
By: Kyle
Svejcar
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Backup Slide 1: ECCO 2
Svejcar, Kyle Propulsion
Component Mass, kg Volume, m3
MMH 297.1 --
N2O4 648.1 --
Helium Pressurant 40.4 --
Nozzle 10.3 7.7
MMH tank 3.9 0.33
N2O4 tank 4.7 0.56
Pressurant tank 5.9 1.1
Feed system 17.0 --
Support Structure 2.4 --
Total 1027.4 9.69
Same Nozzle
Dimensions
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Jillian Roberts
AAE 450: Week 5 Presentations
68
Human Factors and Science
7 April 2011
Duties:
Crew Capsule Group Lead
Launch Vehicle Group
Crew Transfer Vehicle
Water and Waste Management Systems
Spacesuit
Radiation Shielding and Dosimeters
Illumination
Fire Suppression and Detection
Noise Suppression
Crew Capsule Sizing
Topics:
Overview
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Crew Capsule
Roberts, Jillian Human Factors and Science 69
Key Features: 1. Ballute & parachute
cap with tunnel
2. Crew compartment,
instruments and
controls, consumables
and life support for 10
days
3. Side hatch and
windows
4. Ceres regolith storage
5. Curved heat shield
structure
Sketch: Jillian Roberts
Mass: 9834 kg
Power: 1.89 W
Volume: 43.7 m^3
Capsule Totals
CAD by Alex Roth
AAE 450
Spring 2011
70
Human Factors Issues
Roberts, Jillian Human Factors and Science
Problem Solution
Water Supply -Recycling (CTV, Exploration Rovers)
-Stored (Capsule, Rescue Rover)
Noise Suppression Acoustic blankets
Fire Detection and
Suppression
-Portable Fire Extinguishers
-Smoke Detectors
-Portable Breathing Apparatus
Radiation -Extensive shielding
-Dosimeters for continuous monitoring
Lighting -Solid State Light Modules
-Flashlights
Exposure to High G-
Forces
-Mission design and aerodynamic constraints
-Well-trained astronauts at peak fitness
Contingency Situations -Spacesuits
-High safety factor built in for consumables
Waste Generation Dump it!
AAE 450
Spring 2011
71
Maximum G-Forces
Roberts, Jillian Human Factors and Science
-Worst case scenario:
above 4g (peak 9g) for
~45 seconds
-Astronauts could
withstand twice as much
time above 4g as
currently
-However, can’t predict
how they will react when
accustomed to only 0.38g
-Effects:
-Difficulty breathing
-Difficulty reaching
for switches
For accelerations in the +Gx “Eyeballs In” direction
Graphs: Devon Parkos
Figure: Jillian Roberts
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Brendon White
AAE 450: Final Presentation
Tasks Accomplished:
MATLAB artificial atmosphere code
Robonaut/air recycling research
CTV cabin design/spreadsheets
CATIA models
White, Brendon Human Factors and Science
AAE 450
Spring 2011
MATLAB Code
White, Brendon Human Factors and Science
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 8000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
time (days)
mass o
f O
2 (
kg)
Mass of O2 Needed with 6 Crew Members (STP)0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4x 10
6
time (days)
Am
ount of O
2 n
eeded (
liters
)
Amount of Oxygen Needed With 6 Crew Members (Assumes standard pressure)
Without Recycling
With Recycling
With Exercise (no recycle)
With Exercise (recycle)
Computes air
needed for:
• CTV
• Rovers
• Crew Capsule
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Research
White, Brendon Human Factors and Science
Robonaut 1 2
Processors
(i.e. speed)
3 PowerPC
processors
38 PowerPC
processors
Approximate
Power
42 Watts 532 Watts
Total DOF 43 (14 in
each hand)
42 (12 in
each hand)
By: Brendon White and
Ben Stirgwolt
AAE 450
Spring 2011
CTV Crew Cabin Design
White, Brendon Human Factors and Science
Assembly by: Brendon White
Parts by: Brendon White,
Jared Dietrich and Austin
Hasse
CATIA by: Brendon White
Concept by: Jill Roberts
AAE 450
Spring 2011
CTV Spreadsheets
White, Brendon Human Factors and Science
Gases Needed for
Artificial
Atmosphere
Oxygen (O2)
O2 stored at about 3000psi or 200bar
Vehicle/System
Mass
(kg)
Volume
(m3)
Storage Tank Mass
(kg)
Crew Launch Vehicle 5.01 3.3 1.82364
Crew Transfer Vehicle 3507 2.31E+03 1276.548
ISPP 1 5832 2.31E+03 2122.848
ISPP 2 5832 2.31E+03 2122.848
Exploration Rovers 239.7 157.9 87.2508
Rescue Rover 55.92 36.83 20.35488
Earth Descent/Re-entry
Vehicle 5.01 3.3 1.82364
Used Space
(m3) % of Free
Free Space
(m3)
Total Space
(m3)
Kitchen/Dining/Conference Room 5.575 0.261675663 17.97580967 23.55080967
Bathroom 5.54 0.260032856 17.86295705 23.40295705
Cockpit 2 0.093874677 6.448720958 8.448720958
Laundry/Exercise Room 1.69 0.079324102 5.449169209 7.139169209
Medical Suite 6.5 0.305092701 20.95834311 27.45834311
Storage Space 44.303 - 10 54.303
Total Common Area Space (m3) 90
Used Common Space (m3) 21.305
Free Space (m3) 68.695
To Right: Artificial
atmosphere spreadsheet
Below: CTV sizing
spreadsheet
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Other CATIA Models
By: Brendon White
Assembly by: Brendon White
Parts by: Brendon White and
Jared Dietrich
By: Brendon White
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Leonard Jackson
AAE 450: Week 13 Presentations Structures and Thermal Control
ISPP and Comm. Satellites
Satellite Structure
Boom
Array
Bus
Jackson, Leonard Structures and Thermal Control 4/7/2011 80
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Satellite Boom Structure
Coilable Boom Technology Uses Carbon Fiber
Structure Longeron (Black)
Batten (Green)
Diagonals (Red)
4/7/2011 81 Jackson, Leonard Structures and Thermal Control
Volume (m³) Mass (kg)
ECCO 1&2 0.49 152.22
ECCO Base 0.008 26.64
By: Leonard Jackson
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Solar Array Structure
Ultraflex Solar Array
Structure
Radial Spars (grey)
Flexible Vectran Open Weave Mesh (blue)
4/7/2011 82 Jackson, Leonard Structures and Thermal Control
Mass (kg) Volume (m3)
ECCO 1&2 709.6 8.4
ECCO Base 80.6 0.96
Source: Next Generation Ultraflex Solar Array for NASA’s New Millennium Program Space Technology 8
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Mass (kg) Volume (m3)
ECCO 1&2 956.9 193.5
ECCO Base 1364.1 270.75
4/7/2011 83
Bus Structure
Jackson, Leonard Structures and Thermal Control
Honeycomb Structure
Al Alloy (4.4% Cu)
Structure
Big Bus
Little Bus
AAE 450
Spring 2011 Alex Kreul
AAE 450: Week 13 Presentations
Structures & Thermal group
Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) group
Crew Transfer Vehicle (CTV) group
Major tasks accomplished:
CTV Chassis sizing
CTV Primary & Earth Departure Tank sizing
Kreul, Alex Structures & Thermal
AAE 450
Spring 2011
CTV Chassis sizing
Kreul, Alex Structures & Thermal
Alex Roth
Component Material mass
(kg)
Axial members CFRP 3044
Tank support structure Al 250
Hoop members Al 3388
Capsule docking structure Al 905
Landing legs (Andrew Curtiss) CFRP, steel 288
TOTAL 7,875 kg
pictured, axial members, hoop
members, capsule support structure
not pictured: tank support structure,
landing legs
AAE 450
Spring 2011
CTV Tank sizing
Kreul, Alex Structures & Thermal
Tank number
of tanks
V per tank
(m3)
V total
(m3)
M per tank
(kg)
M total
(kg)
Primary (LH2) 3 380 1139 884 2653
Primary (Lox) 3 93 280 487 1460
Earth Departure (LH2) 3 519 1557 1106 3317
Earth Departure (Lox) 3 145 436 806 2419
TOTAL 3,412 m3 9,849 kg
pictured, left: Primary Tanks w/ support structure, kick motor, Ceres regime motor, landing leg
pictured, right: Earth Departure Tanks w/ support structure, kick motor
Alex Roth
AAE 450
Spring 2011
CTV Tank launch
Kreul, Alex Structures & Thermal
Launch type # of
launches
V
per launch
(m3)
V
total
(m3)
M
per launch
(kg)
M
total
(kg)
Primary Tanks (1-3) 3 497 1491 123950 371850
Earth Depart. Tanks (4-6) 3 689 2067 187044 561132
TOTAL 6 3,558 m3 932,982 kg
Alex Roth
1 2 3 4 5 6
AAE 450
Spring 2011
Primary Tank names
Kreul, Alex Structures & Thermal
Alex Roth
Alex Kreul
bigten.org