webinar - pocqi...webinar roles dr amlin shukla, md assistant professor department of neonatology dr...
TRANSCRIPT
Sharing quality improvement experiences from the WHO SEARO region
Maternal, Newborn and Child Health
Improving hand hygiene practices in the NICU
30th August 2018
WEBINAR
GUIDELINES
• Please use the chat box to:
Introduce yourselves
Ask questions
Contribute throughout the session
All participants are muted currently.
To speak use the Raise ha d utto
• Please be patient with the technology
• Any connection problems – Send Email [email protected]
• Participate, Share and Learn
Webinar Roles
Dr Amlin Shukla, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Neonatology
Dr. R.M.L. Hospital and PGIMER,
New Delhi, India
Dr. Sonali Vaid
Improvement
Advisor,
WHO – CC for
Newborn Care @
AIIMS, New Delhi,
India
Speaker Project Lead Moderators
Dr Arti Maria, DM
Prof. and Head of Department
Department of Neonatology
Dr. R.M.L. Hospital and PGIMER, New Delhi, India
Dr Surender Bisht
Senior Specialist &
In-charge, Neonatal ICU
Swami Dayanand Hospital,
New Delhi, India
Dr. R.M.L. Hospital and PGIMER
New Delhi, India
WEBINAR
Improving hand washing among parent-attendants
entering the NICU in a Family Centered Care Model
Hand washing
• WHO: Clean Care Is Safer Care: Ha ds are main pathways of germ tra s issio
• Hand hygiene – Most important measure to avoid transmission of harmful germs.
• Any caregiver or person involved in direct or indirect patient care (Health Care Providers, Family, Paramedical staff etc.)
Why?
Who?
http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Hand_Hygiene_Why_How_and_When_Brochure.pdf
• Dr. R.M.L Hospital and PGIMER has an
NICU providing tertiary level care
In a Family Centered care Model (FCC) in a
16 bedded unit in an area of about 2500sq ft
• This was the first quality improvement initiative that we
undertook
• We contacted a Quality improvement advisor–A good decision
Setting
• Poor compliance among Parent-Attendants to hand washing
despite of AV training sessions as a part of FCC
• This was the first quality improvement initiative that we
undertook
• We contacted Quality improvement advisor–A good decision
Problem
Step 1: Identifying a problem, forming a team and writing an
aim statement
Step 2: Analyzing the problem and measuring quality of care
Step 3: Developing and testing changes
Step 4: Sustaining improvement
Our steps to improve hand washing practices in
NICU
Poor Compliance (20%) to hand hygiene (6 areas for
30 seconds followed by gowning) by Parent-
Attendant before entering into NICU
To increase compliance towards Hand hygiene (6
areas for 30 seconds followed by gowning) by
Parent or attendants entering NICU from 20% to
80% with in 8 weeks (5thJu e 6 - 5th August
2016)
Step 1: Problem Statement
Step 1: Aim Statement
Team members Numbers
Senior resident 1
Nurse In-charge 1
Staff Nurses 2
Sr. Quality Improvement Advisor 1
Project Coordinator 1
Nurse Coordinator 1
Total 7
Step 1: Forming a quality improvement team
Step 2: Analysis using Fishbone Analysis
PROCEDURE
• Sequential
organization
of place
lacking
Non - compliance by
Parent-attendant
With hand hygiene
POLICY
• No
Regular
training
schedule
Parent-attendant
• Knowledge gap
• Lacking Self Motivation
Doctor-Nurse
• Role designation for
trainings lacking
PEOPLE
• No Regular
Supplies
(Water, Soap,
Gowns) PLACE
• Less interactive
training
• No-onsite
Demonstrations
• Parent-Attendants observed for
– Full Compliance to hand hygiene
– Null compliance to hand hygiene
• 10 observations (4 out of 10 at night) over 24 h
• Indicator:
Observations with full compliance
%Observations with full compliance = ---------------------------------------X 100
Total number of observations
Step 2: Data collection
Definition of Compliance
Coverage of all 6 critical hand areas
Duration of 30 secs
Gowning following handwashing
Six critical
hand areas
requiring
cleaning
Observations
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5 Area 6
Duration
30sec Gown
compliance
1 Yes NO Yes Yes NO Yes NO Yes NO
2 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
3 NO Yes Yes NO Yes Yes Yes Yes NO
4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO Yes Yes NO
5 Yes Yes Yes NO NO Yes NO Yes NO
6 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO Yes Yes NO
8 Yes Yes NO NO Yes Yes Yes Yes NO
9 Yes Yes Yes NO NO NO NO Yes NO
10 Yes Yes NO Yes NO Yes Yes Yes NO
Observations with full compliance
Total number of Observations
% compliance to handwashing
2
10
20%
Baseline Data: Observation Checklist (5/6/17)
Step 3: Developing and Testing Change Ideas
• Team came up with several change ideas for improvement
• Tested each of the ideas one by one with PDSA cycles
• This provision had a positive impact on
hand hygiene compliance
• ADOPT! Sequential arrangements of amenities around NICU continued
• NICU shifted to new premises, Provision of
Lockers, Sequential arrangement of
supplies
• Structural Changes and Sequential Arrangement of the Supplies
Plan Do
Study Act
PDSA Cycle-1 Structural Change(5th to 16th June 2016)
LOCKER & FOOT WEAR CHANGE
AREA
HAND WASHING
AREA
HAND DRYING
GOWNS ENTRY
INTO THE NICU
Nursing
Station
Intensive Care Area
EN
TR
Y
PA
SS
AG
E
Footwear
(inside
and
outside )
Nursing
station
Hand
Drying
Area
Hand
washing
Area Gowning
Area
Intensive Care Area
3
1 4 2
5
Process Flow: BEFORE QI
RANDOM
Sequence at
ENTRY AREA
Remove bangles, watch, rings, etc. tie your hair
Remove footwear; put on NICU slippers kept at
entrance
Washing hands (6 areas) for atleast 30 seconds.
Wearing a Gown
NICU Entry process flow
NICU Entry area pics : After reorganization of space
2 1
3
4
5
6 7
1-3 4 5 7 6
Box depicts Step number to be followed before entering inside the NICU
Breast
Feeding
Room
Step down Area
Intensive Care Area
1st
EN
TR
Y
Do
or
FCC Training Area
Gowning Area
PA
SS
AG
E
Ou
tsid
e
Foo
twe
ar
Hand washing Area
TV
Insi
de
Fo
otw
ea
r
Are
a
Ha
nd
Dry
ing
Are
a
2
Lock
ers
1
3
4
5
6
Locker & Foot Wear
Change Area
Hand Washing
Area
Hand Drying Area
Gowning area
Entry Into NICU
Change idea-1 AFTER reorganizing space(5th to 16th June 2016)
2n
d
EN
TR
Y
Do
or
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Results after PDSA 1(5th to 16th June 2016)
% o
bse
rva
tio
ns
wit
h f
ull
co
mp
lia
nce
Date
• This Intervention had a positive impact and
hand hygiene compliance increased
to 40%
• ADOPT! Daily training sessions rotation wise were undertaken by nurses
• Training roster with rotational duties to be made by the nursing in-charge and trainings to be done accordingly
• To engage staff nurses in FCC training according to Nurses training roster.
Plan Do
Study Act
PDSA Cycle-2 Change Of Trainer (17/6/16-21/6/16)
Results After PDSA 2 (17th to 21st June 2016)
Date
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
% o
bse
rva
tio
ns
wit
h f
ull
co
mp
lia
nce
PDSA Cycle- 3 Peer Learning (22nd to 30th June 2016)
• This Intervention had a positive impact and hand
hygiene compliance increased to about 50%
• ADOPT! Interactive sessions were continued
• Peer to peer learning was encouraged
• Training sessions more interactive.
• Also Peer learning among mothers is encouraged
• Improving communication among trainers and mothers and peer learning
Plan Do
Study Act
Results after PDSA 3 (22nd to 30th June 2016)
Date
% o
bse
rva
tio
ns
wit
h f
ull
co
mp
lia
nce
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
06
/05
/16
06
/06
/16
06
/07
/16
06
/08
/16
06
/09
/16
06
/10
/16
06
/11
/16
06
/12
/16
13
/6/1
6
14
/6/1
6
15
/6/1
6
16
/6/1
6
17
/6/1
6
18
/6/1
6
19
/6/1
6
20
/6/1
6
21
/06
/16
22
/06
/16
23
/06
/16
24
/06
/16
25
/06
/16
26
/6/1
6
27
/6/1
6
28
/6/1
6
29
/6/1
6
30
/6/1
6
PDSA Cycle-4 Use of Glogerm (1st to 7th July 2016)
PDSA Cycle-4 Use of Glogerm (1st to 7th July 2016)
• This had a mixed impact and the
product was expensive
• ABANDONED!Discontinued
• Use of glo germ after training
• To introduce glogerm as a tool to demonstrate the importance of the Hand hygiene.
Plan Do
Study Act
Results after PDSA 4 (1/7/16-7/7/16)
Date
% o
bse
rva
tio
ns
wit
h f
ull
co
mp
lia
nce
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
PDSA Cycle-5 Peer Monitoring (8th to 15th July 2016)
• Had a negative impact lead to disharmony among attendants
• Abandoned!Discontinued
• experienced mothers were asked to check the compliance of new mothers
• To ask competent mothers to check on compliance towards hand washing of new mothers. (Peer Monitoring)
Plan Do
Study Act
Results after PDSA 5 (8th to 15th July 2016) %
ob
serv
ati
on
s w
ith
fu
ll c
om
pli
an
ce
Date
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
06
/05
/16
06
/07
/16
06
/09
/16
06
/11
/16
13
/6/1
6
15
/6/1
6
17
/6/1
6
19
/6/1
6
21
/06
/16
23
/06
/16
25
/06
/16
27
/6/1
6
29
/6/1
6
07
/01
/16
07
/03
/16
07
/05
/16
07
/07
/16
07
/09
/16
07
/11
/16
13
/07
/16
15
/7/1
6
PDSA Cycle-6 Selected CCTV footage (16th to 18th July 2016)
• Had a negative impact , lead to naming and shaming
• Abandoned!
• Discontinued
• Shown selected CCTV footage of correct and incorrect hand washing to a group of mothers.
• To show selected CCTV footage to a group of mothers doing 1)correct hand washing 2)Incorrect hand-washing Plan Do
Study Act
Result after PDSA 6(16th to 18th July 2016)
Date
% o
bse
rva
tio
ns
wit
h f
ull
co
mp
lia
nce
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%0
6/0
5/1
6
06
/07
/16
06
/09
/16
06
/11
/16
13
/6/1
6
15
/6/1
6
17
/6/1
6
19
/6/1
6
21
/06
/16
23
/06
/16
25
/06
/16
27
/6/1
6
29
/6/1
6
07
/01
/16
07
/03
/16
07
/05
/16
07
/07
/16
07
/09
/16
07
/11
/16
13
/07
/16
15
/7/1
6
17
/7/1
6
PDSA Cycle-7 Random CCTV footage (19th July to 15th August 2016)
• Positive impact
• Adopted! This method was continued
• Shown random CCTV footage to a group.
• To show random CCTV footage to a group from a past date
Plan Do
Study Act
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
06
/05
/16
06
/08
/16
06
/11
/16
14
/6/1
6
17
/6/1
6
20
/6/1
6
23
/06
/16
26
/6/1
6
29
/6/1
6
07
/02
/16
07
/05
/16
07
/08
/16
07
/11
/16
14
/7/1
6
17
/7/1
6
20
/7/1
6
23
/7/1
6
26
/7/1
6
29
/7/1
6
08
/01
/16
08
/04
/16
08
/07
/16
10
/08
/16
13
/08
/16
Results after PDSA 7 (19th July to 15th August 2016) %
ob
serv
ati
on
s w
ith
fu
ll c
om
pli
an
ce
Date
Run Chart(Weekly)
Results:
The compliance to all six steps of hand washing for
30 sec followed by gowning among
parents/attendants of newborns admitted in the
NICU improved from 20% to 80% over a period of 9
weeks
PDSA 1: Structural changes and sequential arrangement of supplies Adopted
PDSA 2: Regular training with more of demonstrations and practice
sessions at real site
Adopted
PDSA 3: change in training methodology by ensuring a dedicated trainer
and reinforcement by peer learning
Adopted
PDSA 4: cross checking among mothers , but this lead to negative impact on
compliance
Abandoned
PDSA 5: Use of Glo Ger , did t have u h of i pa t Abandoned
PDSA 6: Use of CCTV footage where we identified a mother who is non
compliant, this bought negative impact on compliance
Abandoned
PDSA 7: Use of CCTV footage , where random footage of any attendant is
shown , made huge impact
Adopted
Conclusion
Key messages • Achieving hand hygiene compliance among parent-attendant is
Challenging yet Achievable
• Sequential reorganisation of entry area is important & effective
• Capacity building by healthcare providers is central but peer group
learning should be encouraged: is empowering
• Compliance is enhanced by encouragement & Impeded by punitive
methods
• Contacting QI coach or mentor is essential
• Continuing interventions that yield positive results lead to
sustenance of achievements
Acknowledgement
• USAID-ASSIST
• Our unit staff
/doctors and RML
Hospital
• Babies and their
families for
participation
Thank you!
Open for Questions now!
Please use the chat box to:
Ask questions
Contribute
All participants are muted currently.
To speak message in chat box!
Next Steps
Contact your Coach and schedule a call with your coach.
Share your project in a webinar. Contact us!
Start / Continue QI work and document
Get your POCQI certificate (workbook.pocqi.org)
Email [email protected] to share your QI projects