web viewthe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Directions:
1. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
2. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
3. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 4. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.5. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.6. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 2: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
GENERAL RULES1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.2. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.3. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
4. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: LAISABEL BAYOAsst. Lead Researcher: GERALYN MAE LISTONResearch Associate: SHEENA MAY RAMALLOZAResearch Associate: ROSELIO BORRESResearch Associate: JAMAICA BURROResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 3: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Directions:
7. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
8. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
9. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 10. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.11. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.12. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 4: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
GENERAL RULES5. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: CLOIE VIDALAsst. Lead Researcher: MARY VIER HEMPESOResearch Associate: YAN ASIGNARResearch Associate: GENEROSO ATON JR.Research Associate: CRISAYA LEMORINResearch Associate: JOSHUA ZORILLA
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 5: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Directions:
13. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
14. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
15. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 16. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.17. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.18. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 6: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
GENERAL RULES9. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.10. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.11. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
12. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: JASMINE CABANASAsst. Lead Researcher: ANNA MAE MARZONResearch Associate: SAMERAH ANDANGResearch Associate: WENDY MARIE TORCENOResearch Associate: RHEA MAE TAYASANOResearch Associate: SIR ROLAND STANLEY LEPITEN
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 7: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Directions:
19. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
20. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
21. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 22. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.23. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.24. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 8: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
GENERAL RULES13. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.14. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.15. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
16. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: ZENAIDA CANEDOAsst. Lead Researcher: JAMAICA COCAResearch Associate: RALION AMENResearch Associate: ALGEN QUINDAOResearch Associate: ARIZA OUANOResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 9: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Directions:
25. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
26. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
27. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 28. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.29. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.30. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 10: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
GENERAL RULES17. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.18. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.19. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
20. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: RUNALYN ARNAIZAsst. Lead Researcher: REYNALIE MOMOResearch Associate: RHEALYN GARBOResearch Associate: AL BRIAN MONTEBONResearch Associate: ZOSIM LARANJOResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 11: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Directions:
31. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
32. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
33. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 34. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.35. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.36. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 12: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
GENERAL RULES21. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.22. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.23. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
24. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: MANUEL TUDTUDAsst. Lead Researcher: MARIE LUZ BORDADORAResearch Associate: MAYBELLE NABLEResearch Associate: EDGEL COCAResearch Associate: JULIE ANN DIRONResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 13: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Directions:
37. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
38. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
39. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 40. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.41. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.42. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 14: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
GENERAL RULES25. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.26. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.27. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
28. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: SARAH MAE PENANUEVAAsst. Lead Researcher: SHIELA MARIE RUCASResearch Associate: LOUIE MAYOLResearch Associate: SHEILA MAE ISOKResearch Associate: JOHN CARLO ECHAUREResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 15: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Directions:
43. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.
44. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
45. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 46. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.47. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.48. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.
RESEARCH TITLE
MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT
SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004
RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
![Page 16: Web viewThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022100819/5ab5483a7f8b9adc638cd5ec/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
GENERAL RULES29. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –
OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.30. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.31. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
32. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (less than 17 points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).
Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.
Area 3. Sub-problems/questions
The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.
The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.
The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.
General Comments: _______/90
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score
Lead Researcher: JOSIE DELA VICTORIAAsst. Lead Researcher: IZZA MARIE PONCEResearch Associate: DEMBERTHON LONGAKITResearch Associate: CHIBERLY ARDIENTEResearch Associate: MILDRED REQUINTOSAResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-D12-816-004