falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · web viewit should...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Fatal Error of Present Day Holy Spirit BaptismMichael HatcherINTRODUCTION
For years the church has faced the problem of the Pentecostals and their promotion of
present day Holy Spirit baptism. Faithful preachers met them on the polemic platform and
defeated their doctrines of modern day miracles and Holy Spirit baptism. Sadly, but not
unexpectedly, these same doctrines have now made their way into the church of our Lord. While
some of these brethren are still denying miraculous powers, others are accepting the Pentecostal
view of modern day miracles. Thus, it is of importance that we understand the baptism of the
Holy Spirit.
JOEL’S PROPHECYLet us first turn our attention to the prophecy of Joel. There are some who incorrectly make
the claim that this prophecy is a prophecy of Holy Spirit baptism by trying to equate the pouring
out of the Spirit to baptism of the Spirit. Joel writes, “And it shall come to pass afterward, that I
will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old
men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: And also upon the servants and upon
the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit” (Joel 2:28-29).
Joel is speaking of the Christian age as is evidenced by it shall come to pass afterward. It is
also seen in the last verse of the chapter regarding that salvation that comes in Jerusalem by all
those who call on His name: “And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of
the LORD shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the
LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call” (2:32).
When we are told that the Spirit would be poured out on all flesh, we understand it as a
representative statement. Certainly no one would think that animals would have the Spirit poured
![Page 2: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
out on them, yet animals have flesh. All understand that not even all human flesh is being
referenced as that would include the heathens, atheists, skeptics, infidels, and others. Surely no
one would think that Joel has reference to those types of individuals. Thus we have a
representative statement that the Spirit would be poured out upon some people. He also shows
that the Spirit would be poured out without regard to sex, age, or social distinctions.
JOHN’S PROMISEJohn the Baptist comes on the scene to prepare the way for the Messiah. As he does his
preparatory work, he announces: “I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that
cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you
with the Holy Ghost, and with fire” (Mat. 3:11). This is the first time we are introduced to Holy
Spirit baptism. However, that is not the only baptism to which we are introduced. There is the
baptism in water unto repentance for the remission of sins (Mark 1:4) and the baptism of fire.
The baptism of fire has correctly been pointed out as being eternal punishment as is evidenced by
the context (see verses 10 and 12).
Some see only two baptisms in Matthew 3:11 (Luke 3:16): baptism of the Holy Spirit and
baptism with fire. However, they overlook one. There is also baptism in water. Thus there are
three baptisms, not just two under consideration. However, these brethren often appeal to John’s
use of “you.” They promote a dichotomy that everyone will either receive Holy Spirit baptism or
they will receive baptism in fire. However, the pronoun is simply a generic “you” with the
application and scope to be determined by further revelation. They also face a massive problem
because they fail to take into consideration (according to their own view) that some of those who
would receive Holy Spirit baptism would also receive baptism in fire (unless they take the false
view of the impossibility of apostasy). One last idea is that the baptism of fire is an end-time
event. For their parallel to hold, Holy Spirit baptism must also be an end-time event.
![Page 3: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Brother Roy Deaver wrote regarding this:
It should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who would seek his favor. We must observe carefully the use of the word “you” in verse 11. John said, “I indeed baptize you in water…he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit and in fire.” The pronoun “you” is involved in the statement about John’s baptism in water, and the pronoun “you” is involved in the statement about the Lord’s baptizing in the Holy Spirit. Did all those to whom John was preaching receive John’s baptism? Did John actually baptize all those to whom he was speaking? Obviously, no one could justifiably contend that all these hearers were baptized by John. The Record states plainly that the Pharisees were not baptized by John (Lk. 7:30). Did John baptize “offspring of vipers?” Did he baptize persons who had not demonstrated repentance? Did he baptize persons who were basing their claims to divine favor upon their physical ancestry? We conclude that when John said, “I baptize you in water” that he was using the indefinite “you” and that he was actually saying, “I baptize some of you…” The “you” stands for “some of you”—it could not mean all of you.But, the same word “you” which John uses with regard to himself and the baptizing which he was doing he also uses with regard to the Lord and the baptizing (in the Holy Spirit) which he was to do. If the pronoun “you” with regard to John and his baptizing meant “some of you,” then obviously, the pronoun “you” relating to the Lord and those whom he would baptize in the Holy Spirit likewise means “some of you.” Some of those to whom John spoke upon that occasion would be baptized in water (some already had been), and some to whom John spoke would be baptized by the Lord in the Holy Spirit (30-31).
Thus, we need to look for further revelation as to who will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.
JESUS’ CONFERENCE WITH THE APOSTLESIn John 14-16 Jesus meets with his apostles. During this meeting, He promises to them
another Comforter, the Holy Spirit, upon their love for Him: “If ye love me, keep my
commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he
may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it
seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in
you” (14:15-17). He tells them the Spirit’s work (16:7-15): to reprove or convict the world of sin,
righteousness, and judgment (for a more detailed discussion regarding this see this author’s
chapter “Christ Confronted Error About the Holy Spirit” in the 2013 Spring/CFTF Lectureship
book, Christ—The Great Controversialist, pages 210-221).
![Page 4: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Jesus also reveals to them how the Spirit would accomplish this work. Jesus tells the
apostles:
These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you…. But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me… I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come (John 14:25-26; 15:26; 16:12-13).
The Spirit would come to the apostles (not promised to anyone else here) to: (1) guide them
into all truth, (2) show them things to come, and (3) bring to their remembrance all that Jesus had
said. We are now finding through further revelation the generic “you” of Matthew 3:11 (“he shall
baptize you with the Holy Ghost”) is being limited to the apostles.
AFTER HIS RESURRECTIONJohn records one of the meetings Jesus had with His apostles after His death and
resurrection: “Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even
so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye
the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins
ye retain, they are retained” (John 20:21-23). Jesus was sending His apostles into the world and
to that end He imparted the Holy Spirit to them.
Just prior to His ascension, Luke records:
And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high (Luke 24:46-49).
Several things need to be considered regarding this passage. First, Jesus is speaking to His
apostles. The apostles would be witnesses (no one today qualifies to be a witness). As a witness,
![Page 5: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Jesus would send the promise of the Father to the apostles (not to anyone today). The apostles
were to wait in Jerusalem (where the Law of God would go forth—Isa. 2:2-3) till they were
endued or clothed with power from God. The promise of the Father and the power from on high
are connected together. You cannot have one without the other.
Acts 1 gives another account of Jesus speaking to His chosen ones (the apostles) just prior to
His ascension.
And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence…. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:4-5, 8).
Jesus was assembled with His apostles (“after that he through the Holy Ghost had given
commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen” 1:2). He commands them to wait in
Jerusalem (where the Law of God would go forth—Isa. 2:2-3) for the promise of the Father. He
now identifies the promise of the Father by appealing to John and his baptism (recorded in Mat.
3:11; Luke 3:16). We now know that the promise of the Father (Luke 24:49) is Holy Spirit
baptism. Jesus again ties together inseparably Holy Spirit baptism and the receiving power. The
apostles (not anyone else is under consideration) would receive power when the Spirit came
upon them. Thus, again we see the apostles receiving power connected with the Holy Spirit
coming upon the apostles. You cannot have one without the other. The baptism of the Holy
Spirit, the promise of the Father, and the receiving of power are then connected to being a
witness. When we study through Acts we learn who the witnesses are: we learn they are the
apostles (Acts 1:22-24; 10:39-42). Thus, we again learn the ones who will receive the baptism of
the Spirit are the apostles.
![Page 6: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WHO RECEIVED THE BAPTISM OF THE HOLY SPIRITFrom the preceding, we learned that it was the apostles that were promised Holy Spirit
baptism, and that it was not promised to others. Are we correct in this understanding? One way
to determine such is to see who actually received it. When the baptism of the Spirit was
promised, Jesus instructed the apostles to wait in Jerusalem for it (Luke 24:46-49; Acts 1:4-8).
Thus, it is only sensible to go to Jerusalem and see what happened.
They were waiting in Jerusalem, “And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were
all with one accord in one place” (Acts 2:1). The next few verses show the Holy Spirit coming
upon the “they.” “And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind,
and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues
like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and
began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance” (2:2-4). Who are the “they”
who were filled with the Holy Spirit and thus received Holy Spirit baptism?
Those teaching present-day Holy Spirit baptism, try and make the “they” refer back to Acts
1:15: “And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of
names together were about an hundred and twenty,)” and the 120 mentioned there. However,
grammatically it simply does not fit. “They” is a pronoun and whether a discussion of the Greek
or the English, a pronoun must refer back to an antecedent that agrees in number with it. The
antecedent of “they” would not go back to the 120 of Acts 1:15, but of the apostles. Peter is
speaking of the death of Judas (1:16-20) and the need to have someone take that office (1:20).
Then two individuals (Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias) are
appointed (1:21-23) and after prayer the Lord chooses Matthias (1:24-26). Then it records, “And
they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven
![Page 7: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
apostles. And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one
place” (1:26-2:1).
Some think the grammar is all that we rest our case upon regarding this. The grammar alone
is sufficient, but there is additional evidence—the rest of Acts 2. After the Spirit falls on “them,”
and the gathering of the crowd hearing them speak in the various languages of men, the people
asked, “Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?” (2:7). It would be unlikely that the
entire 120 were Galileans, but all the apostles were (1:11). After the listing of the various people
who were there and hearing “them” speak, some mocked saying they were drunk while others
asked, “What meaneth this?” (2:12-13). We are then told, “But Peter, standing up with the
eleven” (2:14). It was not Peter with the 120 but only the apostles. As Peter was preaching and
proving that God raised Jesus from the dead, he states, “This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof
we all are witnesses” (2:32). We have previously noted that the baptism of the Spirit was directly
connected with being a witness (1:4-8). Thus, again, we observe that the ones who received
Spirit baptism were the apostles, not the 120 (they were not witnesses). He continued, “Therefore
being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the
Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear” (2:33). Receiving of the Father
and the promise of the Spirit goes back to the promise made to the apostles in Luke 24:48-49 and
Acts 1:4-5. Those who were “pricked in their heart” asked “Peter and the rest of the apostles”
(2:37) what they needed to do. They did not ask the 120. The entire context of Acts 2 and the
baptism of the Spirit shows that only the apostles received such—not the 120 of Acts 1:15.
However, a study on who received Holy Spirit baptism would not be complete without a
consideration of Cornelius. I, personally, do not believe that Cornelius and those with him
received Holy Spirit baptism. However, consider some facts. The Holy Spirit fell on them as
![Page 8: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Peter began speaking (Acts 11:15). We have correctly pointed out that the Spirit’s coming upon
them had nothing to do with their salvation but was to give confirmation to the Jews that “God
also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life” (11:18). It was only after their reception of the
Spirit that they were commanded to be baptized in water (10:44, 48). Those who advocate Spirit
baptism today always place the reception of it with baptism. However, this case does not fit their
order of events and thus presents a problem for them.
Those who hold that this is a case of Spirit baptism appeal to Peter’s rehearsing the events:
“And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning. Then
remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye
shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did
unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?” (11:15-
17). When Peter states that it “fell on them, as on us at the beginning,” he continues to show that
he is discussing Holy Spirit baptism. Notice though that this situation was so unusual it caused
Peter to think back to John’s statement regarding the baptism of the Holy Spirit. If everyone
receives Holy Spirit baptism, then this would not have been unusual but the common occurrence.
However, this does not harmonize with what we read.
DESIGN OR PURPOSE OF HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISMThere are two main reasons for Holy Spirit baptism. Once these are understood, we quickly
realize there is no purpose for Spirit baptism today. The first purpose is to effect revelation. We
learn this during Jesus’ conference with His apostles as recorded in John 14-16.
These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you…. I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come (14:25-26; 16:12-13).
![Page 9: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
These two passages teach us four things the Spirit would do for the apostles: (1) He would
teach the apostles all things, (2) He would bring to their remembrance all that Jesus had said,
(3) He would guide them into all truth, and (4) the Spirit would show them things to come. All
four of these things concern revelation. They are necessary for the inerrant, infallible recording
of God’s message to man.
Additionally, it would be most improper to take these things that Jesus stated to His apostles
and make them applicable to all men or all Christians. Christianity is a teaching religion, but if
these applied to Christians today, then there would be no need to teach anyone anything because
the Spirit would be teaching them all things and guiding them into all truth. Nor would there be
the need to edify one another as the Spirit would do it all for us. It is bad hermeneutics to take
statements made to a certain individual or individuals and make it applicable to all. The
exception to this rule would be unless there is something contextually that would indicate a
general application or something elsewhere to show it was applicable to all. There is neither in
relationship to what Jesus tells His apostles on this occasion.
These four things that Jesus mentions to His apostles apply solely to them and not to others.
They apply themselves to the process of revelation. Thus, if people are baptized with the Holy
Spirit today, then revelation continues today. If revelation has ended, and it has, then Holy Spirit
baptism has also ended.
A second purpose of Holy Spirit baptism was to effect confirmation. After giving the Great
Commission to the apostles, Mark records for us: “So then after the Lord had spoken unto them,
he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. And they went forth, and
preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs
following. Amen” (Mark 16:19-20). As the apostles went out preaching God’s Word, the hearers
![Page 10: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
would not know if their message was from God or not. The way the hearers could be assured was
by the confirmatory signs (miracles) they performed. Thus the Hebrews’ writer states, “How
shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the
Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him; God also bearing them witness, both
with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his
own will?” (Heb. 2:3-4). The word of salvation was first spoken by Christ and then by the
apostles (“them that heard him”). God was confirming the spoken word by the “signs and
wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost.” The miracles gave confirmation
that their message came from God.
The apostles by virtue of their baptism of the Spirit had the power to pass the ability to work
miracles to others to confirm the message they preached as being from God. However, since
revelation is not taking place today (God finished His revelation during the first century; Jude 3)
there is no need for Holy Spirit baptism or miraculous powers today.
ONE BAPTISM OF TODAYWhile Paul was in prison in Rome (about AD 60-62), he wrote, “One Lord, one faith, one
baptism” (Eph. 4:5). Thus, at this time there was only one baptism. While there are several
baptisms mentioned in the New Testament, it is generally agreed that all of them were ended at
this time. However, some hold onto Holy Spirit baptism along with water baptism. The
Pentecostals wish the one baptism here is Holy Spirit baptism while our apostate brethren want
to combine the two baptisms (Spirit baptism and water baptism) into one baptism.
When one considers Spirit baptism, it was never related to salvation, a condition of
salvation, or evidence of salvation. However, when one considers water baptism, it was related to
salvation (1 Pet. 3:20-21) and a condition of salvation (Mark 16:16). Brother Guy N. Woods
wrote regarding this:
![Page 11: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
There is no room for equivocation. The element in which we are baptized into Christ is either water or Spirit. If Spirit, then baptism which puts us into Christ is not water baptism. On this hypothesis it would indeed be difficult to see any reason, relating to salvation, why one should be baptized at all. Question: Does baptism in the Holy Spirit, alleged to be available to all believers today, precede or follow water baptism? If it comes before, and in it one is baptized into Christ, in whom are all spiritual blessings, including the forgiveness of sins (Eph. 1:3, 7), it follows that one is in possession of salvation before and without water baptism; if baptism in the Holy Spirit follows water baptism, and in the element of the Spirit one is baptized into Christ, then in spite of the fact that one has been baptized in water, such a one is neither saved nor in Christ! Which horn of this dilemma is preferable? (374).
When one understands that water baptism is the one baptism of Ephesians 4:5, there is no
dilemma. However, can we really know that the one baptism is water baptism? Paul wrote
Ephesians while he was in prison in Rome between 60-62. Thus, at this time Paul by inspiration
of God states there is only one baptism. Prior to this time, there had been other baptisms
(including Spirit baptism). A. T. Robertson writes, “Assuming the genuineness of the Epistle and
the death of Peter about A.D. 67 or 68, and the persecution to be not that under Domitian or
Trajan, but under Nero, the date can be assumed to be about A.D. 65” (72). Thus, we can
confidently affirm that 1 Peter was written after Ephesians. When we go over to 1 Peter 3:20-21,
Peter records, “Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in
the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by
water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the
filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus
Christ.” The baptism Peter discusses is water baptism. Thus since Peter wrote after Paul and
Paul said there was one baptism (not two), the one baptism of Ephesians 4:5 is water baptism,
not Holy Spirit baptism.
ADDITIONAL PASSAGESTwo passages that are often called upon to prove Holy Spirit baptism are John 3:3, 5 and
1 Corinthians 12:13. Let us briefly consider these passages. When Nicodemus came to Jesus by
![Page 12: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
night, Jesus informed him, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he
cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3). Nicodemus did not understand so he asked, “How
can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be
born?” (3:4). So Jesus explained:
Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit. (3:5-8).
Many of those who hold to Holy Spirit baptism when reading this automatically assume that
their case is made for them. They equate being born with baptism, thus they have born of water
as being baptized in water and born of the Spirit as being baptized in the Holy Spirit. There is
one immediate problem with this view: there is only one baptism (Eph. 4:5) and this ends up
with two baptisms (one in water and one in the Spirit). However, the truth of the subject is that
there are two elements that make up the one birth. Those two elements are not two baptisms (as
demanded by those advocating Holy Spirit baptism), but water and Spirit. While baptism is part
of the new birth, baptism alone is not the new birth.
As is true of so many subjects, one must consider the totality of the Bible’s teaching to come
to an understanding of these two elements. In considering water, we learn that it involves
baptism in water as is seen in Acts 8:36-39 and 1 Peter 3:20-21. This is one element of the new
birth while the other element, Spirit is also seen when we look at other passages of Scripture.
Paul told the Corinthian brethren: “For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet
have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel” (1 Cor.
4:15). The way they had been born again was through the Gospel (while not within the purview
of this manuscript, consider they were begotton “in Christ” and we get into Christ through
![Page 13: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
baptism in water—Rom. 6:3-4—where we have newness of life; Gal. 3:26-27—where we
become children of God through the faith or Gospel because we have been born again which
takes place when we are baptized in water). Peter reveals the same when he states, “Seeing ye
have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the
brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently: Being born again, not of
corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever”
(1 Pet. 1:22-23). We are born of incorruptible seed or the Word of God in verse 23 that is
equated with “the truth through the Spirit” in verse 22. By our obedience to the truth that has
been revealed by the Spirit we are born again. Notice also that “being born again” is a perfect
tense verb showing action that has been completed. When was it completed? When they obeyed
the truth. Then James writes, “Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should
be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures” (Jam. 1:18). God begat us with the Gospel or the Word of
Truth. Thus, the instrument by which God effects the new birth is the Word of Truth; it is the
seed or germ. When we believe through the Gospel a conception takes place and the birth
process is completed when we obey the Gospel in being baptized in water for the remission of
our sins.
The other passage that must be considered is Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 12:13. Paul is
in the midst of discussing spiritual (miraculous) gifts, a discussion that began at the start of
chapter 12 and goes through chapter 14. As he begins showing the need and importance of all
members as we are one body, he states, “For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body,
whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink
into one Spirit” (12:13). They take the first phrase of this verse to mean that we are baptized in
the Holy Spirit. They take “by one Spirit” to be the element of the Spirit into that which is one is
![Page 14: falsedoctrinesofman.comfalsedoctrinesofman.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · Web viewIt should be noted first of all that John did not say the Lord would baptize all persons who](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072602/5e98995a068503718f297ab4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
baptized. By is the translation of the Greek en (ἐν). This Greek word is used several times in the
chapter but never with the force of element, it is always used with the force of agency. In fact,
Paul never uses “en Spirit” with reference to element, he is always dealing with agency and thus
properly translated “by Spirit” and not “in Spirit.” Please go back and reread brother Guy N.
Woods’ statement (quoted previously) regarding the dilemma regarding Spirit baptism and water
baptism. You simply cannot have both (water and Spirit baptism) and this passage has nothing to
do with Spirit baptism.
CONCLUSIONThere are several today in the church who are advocating present day Holy Spirit baptism.
While those who initially have advocated this have not gone into Pentecostalism, subsequent
generations will end up in the Pentecostal camp. They are not honest enough to leave the Lord’s
church, instead they stick around and try to infest as many as possible with their heresy.
Jesus gave us a Great Commission (Mat. 28:18-20; Mark 16:15-16; Luke 24:46-47) to go
baptize the believer for the salvation of his soul. That baptism is the one baptism of Ephesians
4:5 and is water baptism. Let us be about our Father’s business.
WORKS CITED:Deaver, Roy. “Matthew 3:11 and Neo-Pentecostalism.” Spiritual Sword 4:4 (1973): 29-33.
Robertson, A.T. Word Pictures in the New Testament. Vol. 6. Nashville, TN: Broadman, 1933. 6 vols.
Woods, Guy N. “The Baptism of the Holy Spirit.” Gospel Advocate, 108:24 (June 16, 1966): 373-75.