Curriculum Vitae

Personal informationFirst name(s) / Surname(s) Mikhail Antonov

E–mail(s) mantonov@hse.ruNationality Russian

Gender Male

Occupational field Teaching legal theory and comparative law, Practising law as an advocate

Work experience(1) Legal counsel at the Federal Post Office 01 October 1998 – 10 October 2000

(2) Procurator’s advisor in civil cases at the General Procuracy office in Petrogradsky district of Saint

Petersburg

11 October 2000 – 17 April 2003

(3) Deputy director at the Saint Petersburg University Publishing House

18 April 2003 – 14 August 2004

(4) Senior legal counsel at ZIV Financial and auditing services (Saint Petersburg)

09 June 2006 – 29 August 2011

(5) Associate professor of Legal Theory at the Saint Petersburg Branch of the National Research

University “Higher School of Economics”

15 April 2010 →

(6) Advocate at the Saint Petersburg Bar Association

(7) Partner with the ‘Aspektum’ Advocate Bureau

27 June 2011 →

19 April 2016 →

Education and training(1) Lawyer 01 September 1992 – 12 June 1994

Name and type of organisation Social Law College, Saint Petersburg

Level in national or international classification Secondary specialized education

(2) State regulation of economy 01 September 1993 – 06 July 1999

Name and type of organisation North-Western State Academy of Public Service, Saint Petersburg

Level in national or international classification Higher education (Specialist degree)

(3) Lawyer 01/09/1995 – 13/07/2000

Name and type of organisation Saint Petersburg State University

Level in national or international classification Higher education (Specialist degree)

(4) Candidate of legal sciences 01/09/2001 – 28/09/2006

Name and type of organisation Saint Petersburg State University

Level in national or international classification Candidate of sciences (PhD), degree conferred on 27.01.2007

(5) Master of social and humanitarian sciences 01/10/2004 – 12/07/2006

Name and type of organisation Université Paris V René Descartes

Level in national or international classification

(6) PhD in Law

Name and type of organization

Level in national or international classification

Master-2

19.12.2019

Leiden University

PhD

Membership in editorial boards

Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava (Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory)

Pravovedenie (Jurisprudence)

Rechtstheorie

Revista da Faculdade de Dereito da Universidade Federal de Minais Gerais

Review of Central and East European Law

Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia

Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN

Since 2008

Since 2012

Since 2013

Since 2013

Since 2015

Since 2015

Since 2018

Page 2 of 14

Publications

Books

1) Theory of Law and State (Moscow: Iurait, 2018), in Russian.

2) History of Legal Thought in Russia (Saint Petersburg: HSE, 2012), 212 p., in Russian; 2nd edition: Moscow: Iurait, 2017;

3) Law and Society in the Conception of Georges Gurvitch (Moscow: HSE, 2013), 448 p., in Russian;

Articles in Western languages 1) The Russian Constitutional Court as a Mediating Link Between Russian and European Law?, in: European Yearbook on Human Rights (Intersentia, 2019), 547–566.2) Religion, Sexual Minorities, and the Rule of Law in Russia, in: 7(2) Journal of Law, Religion and State (2019), 152–183;3) On Corruption in Russia, in: 38(1) DCPE Online (2019), 216–224.4) Truth in Judicial Interpretation from Positivist and Non-Positivist Perspectives, in: 48 Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science (2019), 173–185;5) Religious Beliefs and the Limits of Their Accommodation in Russia: Some Landmark Cases of the Russia Supreme Court, in: 11(1) Religion and Society in Central and Eastern Europe. 2018), 3–19;6) Die Religionsfreiheit in Russland, in: 64(3) Osteuroparecht (2018), 329–346;7) Estruturação do Direito Russo Sob a Perspectiva de Sistemas Normativos, in: Cesar Antonio Serbena, Natalina Stamile (eds.), Concepções de sistema em direito: estudos em homenagem a Eugenio Bulygin (Curitiba: Jurua Editora, 2018), 55–70;8) Eugen Ehrlich and Leon Petrażycki: Are Emotions a Viable Criterion to Distinguish Between Law and Morality?, in: Bartosz Brożek, Julia Stanek, Jerzy Stelmach (eds.), Russian Legal Realism (Berlin, Springer, 2018), 127–138;9) Legal Realism in Soviet and Russian Jurisprudence, in: (43) Review of Central and East European Law (2018), 483–518;10) Philosophy Behind Human Rights: Valery Zorkin vs. the West?, in: L. Mälksoo, W. Benedek (eds.), Russia and European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017), 150–187;11) Law and Economics, Judicial Pragmatism and Their Limits on Both Sides of the Atlantic , in: (42) Review of Central and East European Law (2017), 73–94.12) The Problem of Religious Freedoms and the Legal Conception of Petrazycki, in: P. Szymaniec (ed.), Dimensions of Religious Freedom in Contemporary Europe (Walbrzych, Wydawnictwo im. Angelusa Silesiusa, 2017), 115–130;13) Russian Legal Realism and Transdisciplinarity in Social Sciences at the Turn of the XXth Century, 10 Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas (2017);14) Conservative Philosophy and Doctrine of Sovereignty: A Necessary Connection?, (153) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (2017), 45–59;15) The legal conceptions of Hans Kelsen and Eugen Ehrlich: weighing human rights and sovereignty, (20) Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia (2016), 39–73; 16) La théorie du droit de Georges Gurvitch et ses origines philosophiques russes, 94(3) Droit et Société (2016), 503–512;17) The Realist and Rhetorical Dimensions of the Protection of Religious Feelings in Russia, 40(3-4) Review of Central and East European Law (2015), 229–284 (with Ekaterina Samokhina); 18) Balancing religious freedoms: some examples from the practice of the Russian Constitutional Court, in: Shymaniec P., et al. (eds.) The principle of proportionality and the protection of the fundamental rights in the European states (Wroclaw, Wydawnictwo im. Angelusa Silesiusa, 2015), 259-268.

Page 3 of 14

19) Thinking Law as Communication, 40(2) Review of Central and East European Law (2015), 189–201 (with Vladislav Denisenko); 20) Some Remarks about Legal Systems Integrity, (2) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2015), 148–165;21) Soberania sob a perspectiva juridico-filosofica russa, 60(3) Revista da Faculdade de Direito – UFPR (2015), 39-58; 22) Systemacity of Law: A Phantasm?, 3(3) Russian Law Journal (2015), 110–125;23) Russian Legal Philosophy in the 20th Century, in: E. Pattaro, C. Roversi (eds.) A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, Volume 12(1), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2015), 587–612;24) Communicative Approach and Legal Theory, 45 Rechtstheorie (2014), 1–18 (with Ilya Chestnov & Andrey Polyakov);25) Some Reflections about Unity of Law and of Normative Systems, 5(2) Arts and Social Sciences Journal (2014);26) Algunas Reflexiones sobre la Unidad del Derecho y los Systemas Normativos, in: E. Bulygin, J. Pablo Alonso (eds.) Philisophy of Law International Symposium "Rationality in Law" (Buenos Aires: Faculty of Law of Buenos Aires University, 2014), 21-34;27) Beyond Formalism: Sociological Argumentation in the “Pussy Riot” Case, (1) Revista Critica de Derecho Canonico Pluriconfesional (2014), 15–25.28) Conservatism in Russia and Sovereignty in Human Rights, 39(1) Review of Central and East European Law (2014), 1–40; 29) In the Quest of Global Legal Pluralism, in: A. Aarnio et alt. (eds.) Positivität, Normativität und Institutionalität des Rechts. Festschrift für Werner Krawietz zum 80. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker–Humblot, 2013), 15–30;30) Eugen Ehrlich – State Law and Law Enforcement in Societal Systems, 44(3) Rechtstheorie (2013), 287–313;31) Foreign Court Decisions, Arbitral Awards and Sovereignty in Russia, 38(4) Review of Central and East European Law (2013), 317–340; 32) Normativity and Facticity of Law in the Legal Sociology of Eugen Ehrlich, (4) Law of Ukraine (2013), 263-272.33) Du droit byzantin aux pandectistes allemands: convergences de l'Europe occidentale et de la Russie, in: Identita del Mediterraneo: elementi russi (Cagliari: AM&D Edizioni, 2012), 253–263; 34) Leon Petrazycki’s Legal Theory and Contemporary Problems of Law, in: B. Melkevik (ed.) Standing tall: Hommages à Chaba Varga (Budapest: Pazmany Press, 2012), 371–381 (with Andrey Polyakov);35) Theoretical Issues of Sovereignty in Russia, (37) Review of Central and East European Law (2012), 95–113;36) History of Schism: The Debates between Hans Kelsen and Eugen Ehrlich, 5(1) International Constitutional Law (2011), 5–21; 37) Philosophie du droit et défense de la démocratie. L’activité de Georges Gurvitch au sein de l’Institut de Philosophie du Droit et de Sociologie juridique, in: A. Stora–Lamarre (ed.) La République et son Droit (1870–1930) (Besançon: Presses universitaires de Besançon, 2010), 221–235;38) La raisonnement dialectique de Georges Gourvitch et la philosophie russe, in: F. Lesourd (ed.) La raison: études sur la pensée russe (Lyon: Lume, 2009), 337–356;39) Le fait normatif dans la conception de Georges Davy, (3) Anamnèse (2007), 159–168;40) Unser schwerer Weg zum Recht: Grundprobleme der modernen theoretischen Rechtswissenschaft in Russland, 38(1) Rechtstheorie (2007), 1–12;41) Sources russes de la pensée de Georges Gurvitch: écrits de jeunesse dans les Annales Сontemporaines (1924–1931), (121) Cahiers internationaux de sociologie (2006), 197–226 (with Etienne Berthold).

Articles in Russian and Ukrainian

1) The Problem of Exception and Rule in the Aspect of Application of the Principle of Legality in the Sphere of Religious Freedoms, in: M.A. Belyaev, V.V. Denisenko, A.A. Malinovsky (eds.), The Principle of Legality: Contemporary Interpretations (Moscow: Prospekt, 2019), 134–159, in Russian; Проблематика правила и исключения

Page 4 of 14

при реализации режима законности в области религиозных свобод // Принцип законности: современные интерпретации / под ред. М.А. Беляева, В.В. Денисенко, А.А. Малиновского. М.: Проспект, 2019. С. 134–159. 2) Value of Law in the Aspect of Economic Analysis: the Example of Legal Conception of Evgeny Pashukanis, in: V.I. Pavlov, A.L. Savienok (eds.), Man and Law: Problems of Axiological Bases of Legal Regulation (Minsk: MVD Academy, 2019), 23–32, in Russian; Ценность права в аспекте экономического анализа (на примере правовой теории Е.Б. Пашуканиса) // Человек и право: проблема ценностных оснований правового регулирования / под ред. В.И. Павлова, А.Л. Савёнка. Минск: Академия МВД, 2019. С. 23–32;3) Reflections on Teaching of Theoretical Jurisprudence in the Post-Soviet Russia, in: Problems of the Post-Soviet Theory and Philosophy of Law: Perspectives of Free Society (Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2018), 4–23, in Russian; «Размышления о преподавании теоретической юриспруденции в постсоветской России» // Проблемы постсоветской теории и философии права: перспективы свободного общества. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2018. С. 4–23;4) Legitimacy, Recognition, Validity, and Defeasibility of Legal Norms in the Juridical Vocabulary, 15(2) Russian Journal of Legal Research (2018), 118–124, in Russian; «Легитимность, признание, действительность и отмена правовых норм в юридическом словоупотреблении» // Российский журнал правовых исследований. 2018. Т. 15. № 2. С. 118–124;5) Normativity and Facticity in Defending Religious Freedoms, (3) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2018), 24–49, in Russian; «Нормативность и фактичность в защите религиозных свобод» // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2018. № 3. С. 24–49;6) Formalism and Argumentation in Russian Court Practice, in: E.N. Lisanuyk (ed.), Argumentation in Law and Morality (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2018), 138–158, in Russian; «Формализм и аргументация в российской судебной практике» // Аргументация в праве и морали / под ред. Е.Н. Лисанюк. СПб: Алеф-Пресс, 2018. С. 138–158;7) Legitimacy and Validity of Law, (3) Journal of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2018), 48–81, in Russian; «Легитимность и действие права» // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2016. Т. 13. № 3. С. 48–81;8) Philosophical Justification of Limitation of Religious Freedoms in the Practice of the Russian Constitutional Court and the ECtHR, in: E.L. Potseluev (ed.), Law, Religion and Social Transformations in the XX-XXI centuries (Ivanovo: IvGU, 2018), 360–374, in Russian; «Философское обоснование ограничения религиозных свобод в практике Конституционного Суда РФ и ЕСПЧ» // Право, религия и социальные трансформации в XX-XXI вв. / под ред. Е.Л. Поцелуева. Иваново: ИвГУ, 2018. С. 360–374;9) Methods of Legal Theory in the Context of Transnationalisation of Legal Regulation, in: M.V. Nemytina (ed.), Tendencies of Legal Development in the Sociocultural Space (Moscow: RUDN, 2018), 335–341, in Russian; «Методы теоретического правоведения в контексте транснационализации правового регулирования» // Тенденции развития права в социокультурном пространстве / под ред. М.В. Немытиной. М.: РУДН, 2018. С. 335–341;10) Legal Realism and the Birth of Economic Analysis of Law, in: V.I. Pavlov, A.L. Savienok (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to the Law and Their Influence on Development of Applied Legal Science, Legislation and Law-Application Practice (Minsk: MVD Academy, 2017), 7–15, in Russian; «Правовой реализм и становление экономического анализа права» // Современные подходы к праву и их влияние на развитие отраслевой юридической науки, законодательства и правоприменительной практики / под ред. В.И. Павлова, А.Л. Савёнка. Минск: Академия МВД, 2017;11) Understanding and Interpreting Law in the Light of Various Doctrines of Sovereignty, in: E.N. Tonkov, I.L. Chestnov (eds.), Paradigms of Legal Hermeneutics (Saint Petersburg: Aleteia, 2017), 402–417, in Russian; «Понимание и толкование права в свете различных представлений о суверенитете» // Парадигмы юридической герменевтики / под ред. Е.Н. Тонкова и И.Л. Честнова. СПб.: Алетейя, 2017. С. 402–417;12) Some Introductory Words on «Efficacy of Law» by Eugenio Bulygin, (4) Jurisprudence (2016), 6–15, in Russian; «Несколько вводных слов о «Действенности права» Е.В. Булыгина // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2016. № 4. С. 6–15;13) Interpretation and Application of Law as a Creative Activity, (4) Journal of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2016), 74–86, in Russian; «Толкование и применение права как творческий процесс» // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2016. Т. 56. № 4. С. 74–86;

Page 5 of 14

14) On Positivist Approaches to Understanding of Formal Equality and on the Constitutive Role of Social Recognition, in: V.V. Lapaeva, A.V. Polyakov, V.V. Denisenko (eds.), The Principle of Formal Equality and Mutual Recognition in Law (Moscow: Prospekt, 2016), 86–95, in Russian; «О позитивистских подходах к пониманию формального равенства и конститутивной роли социального признания» // Принцип формального равенства и взаимное признание в праве / под ред. В.В. Лапаевой, А.В. Полякова, В.В. Денисенко. М.: Проспект, 2016. С. 86–95;15) The Ideas of Eugen Ehrlich About Legal Texts as an Object of Interpretation, in: E.E. Tonkov, Yu.Yu. Vetyutnev (eds.), Legal Hermeneutics in the XXI Century (Saint Petersburg: Aleteia, 2016), 208–230, in Russian; «Учение Ойгена Эрлиха о правовых текстах как об объекте толкования» // Юридическая герменевтика в XX веке / под ред.: Е.Н. Тонкова, Ю. Ю. Ветютнева. СПб.: Алетейя, 2016. С. 208–230;16) Binding Force of Law as a Collective and Psychologic Phenomenon?, in: S.N. Kasatkin (ed.), Problems of Methodology and of Philosophy of Law (Samara: Samarskaia gumanitarnaia akademiia, 2016), 56–67, in Russian; «Обязывающая сила права как коллективно-психологическое явление?» // Проблемы методологии и философии права / под ред. С.Н. Касаткина. Самара: Самарская гуманитарная академия, 2016. С. 56–67;17) The Problem of Legal Regulation in the Perspective of Legal Positivism, in: M.A. Beliaev, V.V. Denisenko (eds.), Legal Regulation: Problems of Efficiency, Legitimacy and Justice (Voronezh: Nauka-Unipress, 2016), 151–159, in Russian; «Проблематика правового регулирования в перспективе юридического позитивизма» // Правовое регулирование: проблемы эффективности, легитимности, справедливости / под ред. М.А. Беляева, В.В. Денисенко. Воронеж: Наука-Юнипресс, 2016. С. 151–159;18) About Systemacity of Law, in: I.L. Chestnov, A.G. Cherniavsky (eds.), System of Law in Classical and Post-Classical Dimensions (Moscow: Ruscience, 2016), 32–43, in Russian; «О системности права» // Система права в классическом и постклассическом измерениях / под ред. И.Л. Честнова, А.Г. Чернявского. М.: Русайнс, 2016. С. 32–43;19) Collective and Psychological Reality of Law According to Nicholas Timasheff, (1) Jurisprudence (2016), 182–188, in Russian; «Коллективно-психологическая реальность права Н.С. Тимашева» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2016. № 1. С. 182–188;20) To the Question About “Systemic” Character of Law, (3) Siberian Law Review (2015), 3–9, in Russian; «К вопросу о «системном» характере права» // Сибирский юридический вестник. 2015. № 3. С. 3–9;21) The Neorealist Conception of Michel Troper and the Debates About Legal Judgments in French Legal Doctrine, in: S.N. Kasatkin (ed.), Problems of Methodology and of Philosophy of Law (Samara: Samarskaia gumanitarnaia akademiia, 2015), 116–130, in Russian; «Неореалистическая концепция М. Тропера и спор о правовых суждениях во французской правовой доктрине» // Проблемы методологии и философии права / под ред. С.Н. Касаткина. Самара: Самарская гуманитарная академия, 2015. С. 116–130;22) Formal equality and recognition in law from the standpoint of normative and sociological approaches to law, in: V.V. Denisenko, M.A. Beliaev (eds.), Recognition of Law and the Principle of Formal Equality (Moscow: Sovremennaia ekonomika i pravo, 2015), 137–145, in Russian; «Формальное равенство и признание права с точки зрения нормативистского и социологического подходов к праву» // Признание права и принцип формального равенства: Сборник трудов международной научной конференции (Воронеж, 10-11 июня 2015 г.) / под ред. В.В. Денисенко, М.А. Беляева. М.: Современная экономика и право, 2015. С. 137–145;23) The Doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’ in the Russian legal order: perspectives of application, (3) Law and Economics (2015), 36–43, in Russian; «Перспективы применения доктрины "снятия корпоративной вуали" в российском правопорядке» // Право и экономика. 2015. № 3. С. 36–43;24) Some Reflections About ‘Interdisciplinarity’ of the Legal Science, in: V.G. Grafsky, L.E. Lapteva (eds.), Actual Trends in Analysis of Law: the Problem of an Interdisciplinary Understanding and Cooperation (Moscow: Norma, 2015), 126–135, in Russian; «Некоторые размышления о "междисциплинарности" правоведения» // Актуальные направления анализа права: проблема междисциплинарного понимания и сотрудничества / под ред.: В.Г. Графского, Л.Е. Лаптевой. М.: НОРМА, 2015. С. 126–135;25) The Concept of Legal Communication in the French Legal Doctrine, in: M.V. Nemytina, G.I. Muromtsev (eds.), Law and Society: Evolution in Interaction (Moscow: RUDN, 2015), 81–87, in Russian; «Концепт правового общения во французской правовой доктрине» // Право и общество: эволюция во взаимодействии. Жидковские чтения:

Page 6 of 14

материалы Международной научной конференции. Москва, 28-29 марта 2014 г. / под ред. М.В. Немытиной, Г.И. Муромцева. М.: Российский университет дружбы народов, 2015. С. 81–87;26) On Sufficiency of the Normative Jurisprudence (On the Example of the Question About Validity of Law), in: V.I. Pavlov and A.L. Savenok (eds.). Ethical and Anthropological Characteristics of the Contemporary Law in the Situation of Methodological Pluralism (Minsk: MVD Institute, 2013), 93–100, in Russian; «О самодостаточности нормативной юриспруденции (на примере вопроса о действительности права)» // Этические и антропологические характеристики современного права в ситуации методологического плюрализма / под ред. В.И. Павлова и А.Л. Савенка. Минск: Академия МВД Республики Беларусь, 2015. С. 93–100;27) On Michel Troper’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation and His Debates with Otto Pfersmann, 3(1) Scientific Research (2015), 17–22, in Russian; «О теории конституционного толкования Мишеля Тропера и о его споре с Отто Пферсманном» // Научный поиск. 2015. Т. 1. № 3. С. 17–22;28) The Fundamentals of the Theory of Law and of State, in: V.N. Sinel’nikova (ed.), Jurisprudence. A Textbook (Moscow: Iurait, 2015), 23–47, in Russian; «Основы теории права и государства» // Правоведение. Учебник для академического бакалавриата / под ред. В.В. Синельниковой и др. М.: Юрайт, 2015. C. 23–47;29) Legal Science and Legal Education in the Conditions of Globalization and Integration, (9) State and Law (2015), 112–119, in Russian (with Evgenii Potseluev and Olga Kuzmina); «Юридическая наука и юридическое образование в условиях глобализации и интеграции» // Государство и право. 2015. № 9. С. 112–119 (в соавторстве с Е.Л. Поцелуевым и О.В. Кузьминой);30) Rationality In Law, (3) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2014), 198–208, in Russian; «Pациональность в праве» // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. № 3. С. 198–208;31) Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence: Concurrence or Reciprocity, in: E.L. Potseluev (ed.), The Normative Theory or Law and Development of Jurisprudence in Europe and the USA (Ivanovo : IvGU Publishing House, 2015), 134–153, in Russian; «Чистое учение о праве и аналитическая юриспруденция: конкуренция или взаимодополнение?» // Нормативная теория Ганса Кельзена и развитие юриспруденции в Европе и США / под ред. Е.Л. Поцелуева. Иваново: Издательство ИвГУ, 2015. С. 134–153;32) Pure Theory of Law against Natural Law?, in: Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, Justice and Natural Law. Selected papers (1928–1965) (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2015), 7–107, in Russian; «Чистое учение о праве против естественного права?» // Ганс Кельзен: Чистое учение о праве, справедливость и естественное право / Перев. и сост. М.В. Антонов; СПб.: Алеф-Пресс, 2014. С. 7–107;33) Understanding of Law Through Arts and Literature: Contemporary Interpretations, in: V.G. Grafsky (ed.), Law and Literature (Moscow : Norma, 2014), 129–135, in Russian; «Литературно-художественное восприятие права в его современных толкованиях» // Право и литература / под ред. В.Г. Графского. М.: НОРМА, 2014. С. 129–136;34) Georges Gurvitch: A Project of Legal Sociology, (4) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2014), 63–74, in Russian; «Г.Д. Гурвич: проект социологии права» // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. № 4. С. 63–74;35) On Systemacity in Law and “Systemic” Concepts in Legal Science, (1) Jurisprudence (2014), 24–42, in Russian; «О системности права и «системных» понятиях в правоведении» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2014. № 1. С. 24–42;36) Do Lawyers Need a Legal Theory?, in: M.V. Antonov, I.L. Chestnov (eds.), Theory of Legal Communication and Problems of Contemporary Jurisprudence (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2014), 306–320, in Russian; «Нужна ли юристам теория права?» // Коммуникативная теория права и современные проблемы юриспруденции / под ред. М.В. Антонова и И.Л. Честнова. Т. 2: Актуальные проблемы философии права и юридической науки в связи с коммуникативной теорией права. СПб.: Алеф-Пресс, 2014. С. 306–320;37) Theoretical Alternatives to Systematization of Law (About the Logic of Normative Systems), in: S.N. Kasatkin (ed.) Problems of Philosophy and Methodology of Law (Samara: SGU, 2014), 47–57, in Russian; «Teoретические альтернативы систематизации права (к логике нормативных систем)» // Проблемы философии и методологии права / под. ред. С.Н. Касаткина. Самара: Самарская гуманитарная академия, 2014. С. 47–57;38) Theoretical Questions of the Neorealist Approach to Law: About the Theory of Interpretation by Michel Troper and His Debates with Otto Pfersmann, (1-2) Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law (2014), 91–99, in

Page 7 of 14

Ukrainian; «Теоретичні проблеми неореалістичного розуміння права: про теорію тлумачення Мішеля Тропера та його дискусія з Отто Пферсманном» // Філософія права і загальна теорія права. 2014. № 1-2. С. 91-99; 39) A Precedential Law in Russia: a Myth or Reality?, in: G.I. Muromtsev, M.V. Nemytina (eds.) Legal Traditions (Moscow: RUDN, 2014), 446–453, in Russian; «Прецедентное право в России - миф или реальность» // Правовые традиции. Жидковские чтения: Материалы Международной научной конференции. 29-30 марта 2013 г. / под ред. Г.И. Муромцева и М.В. Немытиной. М.: Издательство РУДН, 2014. С. 446-453;40) Communication and Theory of Law, (6) Jurisprudence (2013), 78–95, in Russian (with Andrei Polyakov & Ilya Chestnov); «Коммуникативный подход и теория права» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 6. С. 78-95 (в соавторстве с А.В. Поляковым и И.Л. Честновым);41) Human Rights, Democracy, Rule of Law and Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies, (6) Jurisprudence (2013), 8–16, in Russian (with Sergei Maksimov); «Права человека, демократия, верховенство права и современные социальные вызовы в комплексных обществах» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 6. С. 8-16 (в соавторстве с С.И. Максимовым);42) Jubilee of Werner Krawietz, (6) Jurisprudence (2013), 257–261, in Russian (with Andrei Polyakov & Sergei Korolev); «Юбилей Вернера Кравица» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 6. С. 257-261 (в соавторстве с А.В. Поляковым и С.В. Королевым);43) Philosophy and the Contemporary International Law, (4) Jurisprudence (2013), 194–207, in Russian (with Vadim Perov, Elena Lisanuyk, Larisa Demina); Философия и современное международное право // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 4. С. 194-207 (в соавторстве с В.Ю. Перовым, Л.А. Деминой, Е.Н. Лисанюк);44) Hans Kelsen (1881–1973): the Basic Facts about His Intellectual Itinerary, (1) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2013), 3–15, in Russian; «Ганс Кельзен (1881–1973): основные вехи интеллектуального пути» // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. № 1. С. 3-15;45) The Idea of Democracy according to Pure Theory of Law, 88(1) Russian Juridical Journal (2013), 45–55, in Russian; «Концепция демократии в контексте чистого учения о праве (к 40-летней годовщине смерти Ганса Кельзена (1881-1973))» // Российский юридический журнал. 2013. Т. 88. № 1. С. 45-55;46) Natural Law in the Prism of Pure Theory of Law, (4) Law of Ukraine (2013), 189–211, in Russian; «Естественное право в призме чистого учения о праве» // Право Украины. 2013. Т. 4. № 2013. С. 189-211;47) Normative Systems in Legal Theory and Logic of Norms, in: ‘Normative Systems’ and other Works In Legal Philosophy and Logic of Norms by Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin (Saint Petersburg: SBbGU Publishing House, 2013), 4–43, in Russian (with Elena Lisanyuk); «Нормативные системы в теории права и логике норм» // "Нормативные системы" и другие работы по философии права и логике норм / под ред. Е.Н. Лисанюк. СПб.: Издательский дом СПбГУ, 2013. С. 4-43 (в соавторстве с Е.Н. Лисанюк);48) The Path of Life and the Legal Conception of Hans Kelsen, (1) Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law (2013), 345–353, in Ukrainian; «Творчний шлях та правове вчення Ганса Кельзена» // Філософія права і загальна теорія права. 2013. № 1. С. 345-353;49) Theoretical Alternatives to Systematization of Law, (2) Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law (2013), 240–252, in Ukrainian; «Теоретичні альтернативи систематизації права» // Філософія права і загальна теорія права. 2013. № 2. С. 240-252;50) On Some Questions Connected with the ‘Precedential Revolution’ in Russia, 34(4) Journal of Constitutional Justice, 9–14, in Russian; «О некоторых теоретических вопросах прецедентной революции в России» // Журнал конституционного правосудия. 2013. Т. 34. № 4. С. 9-14;51) Integral Jurisprudence or Encyclopedia of Law?, in: V. Grafsky (ed.) Encyclopedia of Law or Integral Jurisprudence: the Problems of their Analysis and Teaching (Moscow: Norma, 2013), 88–98, in Russian; «Об интегральной юриспруденции и энциклопедии правоведения» // Энциклопедия правоведения или интегральная юриспруденция? Проблемы изучения и преподавания / под ред. В.Г. Графского. М.: Норма, 2013. С. 88-98;52) The Basic Elements of Pure Theory of Law, (4) Journal of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2013), 172–195, in Russian; «Об основных элементах чистого учения о праве Ганса Кельзена» // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2013. № 4. С. 172-195;

Page 8 of 14

53) The Methodological Foundations of Pure Theory of Law, in: N. Nizhnik (ed.) History and Modernity: 210 Years of Ministry of Internal Affairs (Saint Petersburg: MVD University, 2013), 30–35, in Russian; «О методологических основаниях чистого учения о праве Ганса Кельзена» // 210 лет МВД России: история и современность: Материалы всероссийской научно-практической конференции 21.09.2012 / под ред. Н.С. Нижник. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский университет МВД России, 2013. С. 30-35;54) Eugen Ehrlich: Living Law versus Legal Pluralism?, (1) Jurisprudence (2013), 151–175, in Russian; «Ойген Эрлих: живое право против правового плюрализма?» // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 1. С. 151-175;55) Rationality and Economical Choice in Law: the Genesis and the Context of the Problem, in: I. Nevazzhai (ed.) The Human World – a Normative Dimension. Vol. 3 (Saratov: SGU, 2013), 245–254, in Russian; «Рациональность и экономический выбор в праве: генезис и контекст проблемы» // Мир человека: нормативное измерение – 3. Рациональность и легитимность / под ред. И.Д. Неважжая. Саратов: Саратовская государственная юридическая академия, 2013. С. 245-254;56) Systematization of Law: in the Quest of Effectiveness, in: V.I. Pavlov and A.L. Savenok (eds.). Classical and Post–Classical Methodologies of Development of Jurisprudence (Minsk: MVD Institute, 2013), 64–76, in Russian; «Систематизация в праве: в поиске эффективности» // Классическая и постклассическая методологии развития правоведения / под ред. В.И. Павлова и А.Л. Савенок. Минск: Институт МВД, 2013. С. 64–76;57) The Vocabulary of Legal Doctrine (According to Hans Kelsen’s Conception), in: I.L. Chestnov (ed.) Being of Law in Signs and Symbols (Saint Petersburg: IVESEP, 2013), 181–199, in Russian; 58) European Academy of Legal Science, (4) Jurisprudence (2012), 267–271, in Russian (with Ekaterina Samokhina);59) Law and the Global Legal Community, (1) Jurisprudence (2012), 242–253, in Russian (with Ekaterina Samokhina); 60) Eugen Ehrlich about Laws and Justice, (2) Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law (2012), 356–368, in Ukrainian;61) The Sociological Conception of Law by Eugen Ehrlich in the Context of the Contemporary Debates About Legal Pluralism, in: (6) Ehrlich’s Collection (2012), 8–13, in Russian;62) The Method and the Perspectives of the Legal Conception of Eugen Ehrlich, (4) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2012), 39–50, in Russian;63) Sociology of Law and Pure Theory of Law: А Complicated Interconnection, (1) Philosophy of Law and General Theory of Law (2012), 250–255, in Ukrainian;64) Sociological Elements in Hans Kelsen’s Conception, in: O.V. Kuz’mina, E.L. Potseluev (eds.) Legal Positivism and Concurrence of Theories of Law (Ivanovo: IvGU, 2012), 184–198, in Russian;65) The Integration of Knowledge about Law and about Society in the Work of Eugen Ehrlich, (1) State and Law (2011), 79–87, in Russian;66) Rule of Law in the Contemporary Jurisprudence, (2) Civil Society in Russia and Abroad (2011), 2–4, in Russian;67) Norms and Normative Systems in Philosophy, Law and Informatics, (5) Jurisprudence (2011), 237–247, in Russian (with Elena Lisanyuk and Vadim Perov); 68) On Some Theoretical Questions Connected with Applicability of Economical Analysis of Law in Russia, (3) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2011), 10–25, in Russian;69) Development of Legal Science and the Principles of Science, in: V. Grafsky (ed.) Standards of Science and Homo Juridicus in the Light of Legal Philosophy (Moscow: Norma, 2013), 143–153, in Russian;70) System of Law and System of Legislation, (3) Law and Economics (2011), 53–58, in Russian;71) The Problem of Systemacity in ‘Normative Systems’, (4) Conflictology (2011), 109–117, in Russian; 72) The Concept of Legal Subject in the System of Theoretical Concepts: from Terminological Debates to Methodological Reinterpretation, in: T. Zamotaeva et alt. (eds.) Problems of Legal Subjectivity: the Contemporary Interpretations (Samara: SGA, 2011), 31–40, in Russian;73) Legal Communication and the Contemporary State, (6) Jurisprudence (2011), 214–220, in Russian (with Andrey Polyakov);

Page 9 of 14

74) The Contemporary Legal Theory in France: the Realist Approach to Law according to Michel Troper and the Debates about Neo–Realism in Interpretation, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 321–345, in Russian;75) Pure Theory of Law: Variants for Translation and Interpretation, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 499–510, in Russian; 76) Sociology of Law: the Birth of a New Scientific Discipline, in: Eugen Ehrlich, Grundlage der Soziologie des Rechts (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2011), 9–63, in Russian;77) About the Content of the Concept ‘Rule of Law’, (1) Questions of Law and Economics (2010), 14–18, in Russian; 78) About Defining the Concept ‘Rule of Law’, (3) Law: Journal of Higher School of Economics (2010), 128–143, in Russian;79) On Intellectual Sources of the Legal Conception of Georges Gurvitch, (3) Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 667–689, in Russian; «Об интеллектуальный истоках правовой концепции Г.Д. Гурвича» // Российский ежегодник теории права. 2010. № 3. С. 667–689;80) Law in the Aspect of ‘Normative Systems’, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 297–308, in Russian; 81) Georges Gurvitch as a Sociologist, in: A. Kirpichnikov (ed.) Cultural Heritage of the Russian State, Vol. 2, Part 5 (Saint Petersburg: Vesti, 2010), 132–141, in Russian; 82) William Twining about the Problems of the Contemporary Jurisprudence, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 229–231, in Russian; 83) Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Fifty Years, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 812–824, in Russian; 84) Economic Analysis of Law and the Problems of Methodology of Comparative Law, in: T. Alekseeva, M. Antonov (eds.), Comparative Approach to Analysis of Sources of Law (Saint Petersburg, 2010), 7–30, in Russian;85) A Belated Reply: On One of the Last Works of Eugen Ehrlich, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 320–331, in Russian;86) Exclusive Positivism and Theory of Legal Argumentation: the Debates between Eugenio Bulygin and Manuel Atienza, (1) Jurisprudence (2010), 224–235, in Russian;87) Alf Ross about the Problem of Validity of Law, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 454–457, in Russian;88) Neutrality and Legal Theory, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 683–703, in Russian;89) Perspectives for Studying Natural Law from the Standpoint of Brian Bix’s Theory, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 63–68, in Russian (with Sergey Kasatkin);90) The Polemics between R. Alexy and E. Bulygin about a Necessary Connection between Law and Morality, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 34–41, in Russian; 91) The Sociology of Law by Eugen Ehrlich, (6) Jurisprudence (2008), 128–137, in Russian; 92) The Sources of Sociological Jurisprudence: Eugen Ehrlich, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 565–592, in Russian; 93) The Aspects of the Contemporary Jurisprudence: if there is a Room for Normative Positivism?, (3) Jurisprudence (2008), 176–179, in Russian (with Andrey Polyakov); 94) Law and Legal Cultures in the XXI Century: Similarities and Divergences, (2) Jurisprudence (2008), 124–146, in Russian (with Andrey Polyakov); 95) Differences and Similarities of Legal Cultures in the XXI Century, (6) Problems of Legal Philosophy (2008), 7–17, in Russian (with Andrey Polyakov and Sergey Maksimov);96) Scandinavian Legal Realism, Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 645–668, in Russian; 97) Georges Gurvitch and the Russian Post–Classic Legal Thought at the Turn of XX Century, (4) Jurisprudence (2005), 131–137, in Russian (with Andrey Polyakov); 98) Sociology of Law According to Georges Gurvitch, (2) Jurisprudence (2003), 218–234, in Russian.

Reviews1) Review of : Feldbrugge F. A History of Russian Law. From Ancient Times to the Council Code (Ulozhenie) of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich of 1649. Boston; Leiden: Brill, 2018. 1097 р. in: 14(3) Journal of the Institute of State and

Page 10 of 14

Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2019), 217–229, in Russian; Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2019. № 3. С. 217–229;2) Review of : Cercel C.S. Towards a Jurisprudence of State Communism. Law and the Failure of Revolution. London: Routledge, 2018. 240 р. in: 14(1) Journal of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2019), 199–214, in Russian; Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2019. № 1. С. 199–214;3) Review of: Kathryn Hendley. Everyday Law in Russia. Cornell University Press, 2017, 285 pp., in: (43) Review of Central and East European Law (2018), 87–98; 4) Review of: Anton Mikhailov. Aktualnye voprovy teorii pravovoi ideologii i iuridicheskoi metodologii. Moscow: Iurlitinform, 2016. 451 p., in: (3-4) Law and State (2017), 208–218, in Russian; Право и государство. 2017. № 3-4. С. 201–218;5) Review of: Athanase Giocas. Le bien justifié: une lecture contemporaine de la synthèse philosophico-juridique de Vladimir S. Soloviev. Québec: Presse de l’Université Laval, 2016. 241 p., in: (2) Journal of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2017), 211–221, in Russian; Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2017. № 2. С. 211–221;6) Review of: Mary MacAuley, Human Rights in Russia: Citizens and the State from Perestroika to Putin. I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., London, New York, 2015, 353 pp., in: (41) Review of Central and East European Law (2016), 27–36; 7) Review of: Eric Posner, The Twilights of Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 185 pp., in: (41) Review of Central and East European Law (2016), 49–53; 8) Review of: Bjarne Meklevik, Philosophie du Droit. Vol. 2. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2014, 592 pp., in: (6) Jurisprudence (2015), 220–229, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2015. № 6. С. 220–229; 9) Review of: Carel Stolker, Rethinking the Law School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 454 pp., in: (5) Jurisprudence (2015), 220–226, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2015. № 5; С. 220–226;10) Review of: Richard Nobles and David Schiff (eds.). Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014, 361 pp., in: (4) Jurisprudence (2015), 217–227, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2015. № 4; С. 217–227;11) Review of: Lauri Mälksoo, Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 240 pp., in: 40(2) Review of Central and East European Law (2015), 205–211; 12) Review of: Bill Bowring, Law, Rights and Ideology in Russia: Landmarks in the Destiny of a Great Power. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, 2013, 238 pp., in: 40(2) Review of Central and East European Law (2015), 213–218; 13) Review of: Provencher G. Droit et communication: Liaisons constatées. Réflexions sur la relation entre la communication et le droit. Bruxelles: E. M. E., 2013. 204 p., in: (4) Jurisprudence (2014), 270–276, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2014. № 4; С. 270–276;14) Review of: Bjarne Melkevik. Epistémologie juridique et déjà-droit. Paris: Buenos Books International, 2014. 121 p., in: (2) Jurisprudence (2014), 252–259, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2014. № 2; С. 252–259;15) Review of: Jaakko Husa, Mark Van Hoecke (eds.) Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2013. 268 p., (1) Jurisprudence (2014), 252–266, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2014. № 1. С. 252-266;16) Review of: Jacques Le Goff. Georges Gurvitch: Le pluralisme createur. Paris: Michalon, 2012, 126 p., in: (2) Jurisprudence (2013), 263–270, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 2; С. 263–270;17) Review of: Csaba Varga. Codification as a socio–historical phenomenon. 2nd ed. Budapest: Szent Istvan Tarsulat, 2011, 431 p., in: (4) Jurisprudence (2013), 254–263, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2013. № 4; С. 254–263;

Page 11 of 14

18) Review of: Bjarne Melkevik, Philosophie du droit, t. l, Quebec, Les Presses de l'Universite Laval, 2010. 649 p., ISBN 978–2–7637–8952–1, in: (54) Les Cahiers du Droit (2013), 1029–1035;19) Review of: Anna Taitslina, Controversies in Natural Law: from Zenon to Grotius. Saarbrucken, 2012, in: (6) Jurisprudence (2012), 250–257, in Russian; Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2012. № 6; С. 250–257; 20) Reviews of: Matthew Parish, Mirages of International Justice: The Elusive Pursuit of a Transnational Order. Cheltenham, 2011, 261 p.; Oresto Pollicino et alt. (eds.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws. Groningen, 2010, 511 p., in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 842–848, in Russian; Российский ежегодник теории права. 2010. С. 842–848; 21) Reviews of: Roger Cotterrell, Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory . Aldershot, 2007, 199 p.; Frederic Schauer, Thinking as a Lawyer: a New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Cambridge Mass., 2009, 239 p.; Manfred Rehbinder, Rechtssoziologie. Munich, 2009, 207 p.; Bjarne Melkevik, Marxisme et Philosophie du Droit: Le cas Pasukanis. Paris, 2010, 132 p.; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 726–737, in Russian; Российский ежегодник теории права. 2009. С. 726–737;

Translations (books)1) Hans Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre (1960), from German to Russian (Saint Petersburg, Alef-Press, 2015), 542 p. (with Sergei Loesov);2) Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, Justice and Natural Law. Selected papers (1928–1965), from German and English to Russian (Saint Petersburg, Alef-Press, 2015), 704 p.;3) Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin, Normative Systems (1971), from English to Russian; in: ‘Normative Systems’ and other Works in Legal Philosophy and Logic of Norms by Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin (Saint Petersburg, 2013), 380 p.;4) Georges Gurvitch, Rechtssoziologie (1958), from German to Russian; in: Mikhail Antonov, Law and Society in the Conception of Georges Gurvitch (Moscow: HSE, 2013), 362–410;5) Mark Van Hoecke, Law as Communication (2002), from English to Russian (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2012), 292 p. (with Andrey Polyakov);6) Eugen Ehrlich, Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts (1913), from German to Russian (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2011), 704 p.; 7) Georges Gurvitch, Ecrits russes (ecrits de jeunesse), from Russian to French (Paris: L'Harmattan, 2006), 314 p. (with Cecil Rol);8) Georges Gurvitch, L’expérience juridique et la philosophie pluraliste du droit (1935), from French to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004, 848 p.), P. 213–459; 9) Georges Gurvitch, L’idée du droit social (1932), from French to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004, 848 p.), P. 41–459; 10) Georges Gurvitch, Magie et Droit (1955), from French to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004, 848 p.), P. 471–556;11) Georges Gurvitch, Sociology of Law (1942), from English to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004, 848 p.), P. 565–780 (with Larisa Voronina).

Translations (articles)1) Ralf Poscher, “Die erfolglose Suche der Prinzipientheorie nach ihrem Gegenstand”, from German to Russian, in: (5) Jurisprudence (2015), 135–158;2) Eugenio Bulygin, “My Vision of Rationality of Law”, from English to Russian, in: (5) Jurisprudence (2015), 17–23;3) Bjarne Melkevik, “Juges et démocratie”, from French to Russian, in: Bjarne Melkevik, Legal Practice in the Mirror of Philosophy of Law (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2015), 191–207 (with Vladislav Denisenko); 4) François Ost, “Le droit dans le mirroir de la literature”, from French to Russian; in: V.G. Grafsky (ed.), Law and Literature (Moscow : Norma, 2014), 229–243;

Page 12 of 14

5) Michel Troper, “Responsabilité politique et fonction gouvernementale” (2008), from French to Russian; in: (4) Jurisprudence (2014), 196–212;6) Roger Cotterrell, “Jurists and Philosophers: Radbruch and Dworkin” (2013), from English to Russian; in: (2) Jurisprudence (2014), 227–241;7) Eugenio Bulygin, “My Vision of Rationality of Law” (2013), from English to Russian; in: M.V. Antonov, I.L. Chestnov (ed.), Theory of Legal Communication and Problems of Contemporary Jurisprudence (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2014), 33–39;8) Athanasios Gromitsaris, Werner Krawietz, Klaus Veddeler, „Rechtskommunikation im modernen Rechtssystem“ (2012), from German to Russian; in: (6) Jurisprudence (2013), 58–77;9) Eugenio Bulygin, “Gott, Freiheit und Determinismus” (1977), from German to Russian; in: ‘Normative Systems’ and other Works In Legal Philosophy and Logic of Norms by Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2013), 223–233;10) Eugenio Bulygin, “Der Problem der Geltung bei Kelsen” (2005), from German to Russian; in: ‘Normative Systems’ and other Works In Legal Philosophy and Logic of Norms by Carlos E. Alchourron and Eugenio Bulygin (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2013: 344–357);11) Georges Gurvitch, “Mon itinéraire intellectuel” (1958), from French to Russian; in: Mikhail Antonov, Law and Society in the Conception of Georges Gurvitch (Moscow: HSE, 2013), 311–323;12) Georges Gurvitch, “Hyper–Empirisme Dialectique. Ses Applications en Sociologie” (1953), from French to Russian; in: Mikhail Antonov, Law and Society in the Conception of Georges Gurvitch (Moscow: HSE, 2013), 343–361;13) Bjarne Melkevik, “Parlez «Novdroit»! Ou comment le politiquement correct se légitime juridiquement”, from French to Russian; in : (1) Jurisprudence (2012), 37–56 (with Elena Patrikeeva);14) Stanley Paulson, “Normativismus Hans Kelsens” (2006), from German to Russian; in: (6) Jurisprudence (2012), 158–175;15) Mattias Iestaedt, “Hans Kelsens Reine Rechtslehre. Eine Einführung” (2008), from German to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 531–552;16) Olivier Jouanjan, “A Philological Turn in Philosophy of Law”, from English to Russian; in: (4) Jurisprudence (2011), 221–235 (with Ekaterina Samokhina);17) Michel Troper, “Kelsen, la théorie de l’interprétation et la structure de l’ordre juridique” (1994), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 196–204;18) Otto Pfersmann, “Le sophisme onomastique. A propos de l’interprétation de la constitution” (2005), from French to Russian; in: (4) Jurisprudence (2012), 104–132;19) Michel Troper, “Réplique à Otto Phersmann” (2002), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 273–291;20) Michel Troper, “La liberté d’interprétation du juge constitutionel”(1995), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 184–195;21) Otto Pfersmann, “Contre le néo–réalisme juridique: Pour un débat sur l’interprétation” (2002), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 218–272;22) Otto Pfersmann, “Une théorie sans objet, une dogmatique sans théorie. En réponse à Michel Troper” (2002), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 292–320;23) Georges Gurvitch, “La théorie des sources du droit d’Eugene Ehrlich et l’idée du droit social” (1931), from French to Russian; in: Eugen Ehrlich, Grundlage der Soziologie des Rechts (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2011), 653–666;24) Stanley Paulson, “The Very Idea of Positivism” (2011), from English to Russian; in: (4) Jurisprudence (2011), 32–49;25) Hans Kelsen, “Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik” (1934), from German to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2011), 418–498;26) Werner Krawietz, “Juridische Kommunikation im modernen Rechtssystem in rechtstheoretischer Perspektive” (2008), from German to Russian; in: (5) Jurisprudence (2011), 8–26;

Page 13 of 14

27) William Twining, “General Jurisprudence” (2005), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 232–279; 28) Alf Ross, “Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law” (1961), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 458–473;29) Brian Bix, “On the Dividing Line between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism” (2001), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 68–80 (with Sergey Kasatkin);30) Eugenio Bulygin, “Is Legal Philosophy Based on a Mistake?”, from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2010), 53–62;31) Eugen Ehrlich, “Die richterliche Rechtsfindung auf Grund des Rechtssatzes: Vier Stücke aus dem in Vorbereitung begriffenen Werke: Theorie der richterlichen Rechtsfindung” (1917), from German to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2009), 332–375;32) Eugen Ehrlich, Hans Kelsen: Discussion (1915–1916), from German to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 604–644;33) Joseph Raz, “Reasoning with Rules” (2007), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 457–472;34) Werner Krawietz, “The Concept of Law Revised” (2001), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 433–445 (with Andrey Polyakov);35) Csaba Varga, “Nature of Law and Legal Reasoning” (2008), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 343–356;36) Roger Cotterrell, “Ehrlich at the Edge of Empire: Centres and Peripheries in Legal Studies” (2009), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 546–564;37) Robert Alexy, “Die juristische Argumentation als rationales Diskurs” (1995), from German to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 446–456;38) Eugen Ehrlich, “Sociology of Law” (1916), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 593–603;39) Bjarne Melkevik, “La philosophie du droit dans le tourbillon de la modernité” (2005), from French to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 527–546 (with Assya Ostroukh);40) Frederic Schauer, “Is There a Concept of Law?” (2007), from English to Russian; in: Russian Yearbook of Legal Theory (2008), 510–526;41) Georges Gurvitch, “Die Zwei Grössten Russischen Rechtsphilosophen: Boris Tschitscherin und Wladimir Solowiew” (1922–1923), from German to Russian, (4) Jurisprudence (2005), 138–164 (with Andrey Polyakov);42) Trigéaud J.–M. “L’idée du droit social de Georges Gurvitch“ (1993), from French to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004), 805–809;43) Roscoe Pound, “Sociology of Law“ (1942), from English to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004), 828–834; 44) François Terré, “Magie et Droit” (2003), from French to Russian, in: Georges Gurvitch, The Collected Works (Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of SPbGU, 2004), 819–828.

Edited books

1) Theory of Legal Communication and Problems of Contemporary Jurisprudence (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2014), in two volumes (with Ilia Chestnov), in Russian;2) Bjarne Melkevik, Legal Practice in the Mirror of Philosophy of Law (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2015), in Russian (translation);3) Csaba Varga, The Enigma of Law and of Legal Mentality (Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press, 2015), in Russian (translation).

Page 14 of 14