web usage and learning styles in an academic course moshe leiba rafi nachmias knowledge technology...

21
WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of Education Tel-Aviv University Israel

Upload: erik-harrison

Post on 12-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE

Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias

Knowledge Technology LabScience and Technology Education Center

School of EducationTel-Aviv University

Israel

Page 2: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

• Introductory Biology courses contain massive amount

of new concepts and information.

• Many students do poorly or drop out (Belzer, Miller, &

Shoemake, 2003).

The Problem

Purpose• To asses students’ usage of E-learning components

in an academic course.

• To explore the relationship between learning styles

and students’ web usage.

Page 3: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

• Web servers record and accumulate data about user

activities.

• There is a large variance among students in viewing

E-learning components, most students used only a

small percentage of the available items, whilst few

students viewed all of them (Nachmias & Shany, 2002;

Nachmias & Segev, 2003).

Web Usage

Page 4: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

• Learning styles are defined as “characteristic

cognitive, affective, and psychological behaviors that

serve as relatively stable indicators of how learners

perceive, interact with, and respond to the learning

environment” (Keefe, 1979).

• One learning style is neither preferable nor inferior to

another: these are simply different approaches, with

different characteristic strengths and weaknesses

(Felder & Brent, 2005).

Learning Styles

Page 5: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Felder and Silverman (1988) categorized students into

four dimensions which relate to different aspects of the

learning process:

Visual

Verbal

Sensory

Intuitive

Active

Reflective

Sequential

Global

Input

Perception

Processing

Understanding

Page 6: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Method

• Quantitative methodology.

• Web Mining: process of extracting information

concerning the usage behavior of the users - an

objective and noninvasive research method (Pahl,

2004).

• Participants: 71 bio-medical engineering,

undergraduate students 37 participants (52.1%) were

men and 34 (47.9%) were women.

Page 7: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Data Collection Tools• Log Files

The fields of the log format are: Student’s ID, Content

Item accessed, Time of Access, Posting a Message

and Viewing a Message.

Page 8: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

• Index of Learning Styles (ILS)

The ILS questionnaire (Felder & Solomon, 1994)

consists of 44 ‘‘choose A or B’’ items with 11 items

corresponding to each dimension. The score on a

dimension would be an odd number between -11 and

+11.

Data Collection Tools

Page 9: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

The CourseAn introductory biology course at Tel-AvivUniversity, Israel in the year 2005.

The students were offered several E-learningcomponents which they were not required to use:

• Presentations • Simulations• Video lectures• Virtual laboratories• E-journals and E-books (E- Resources)• E-papers• E-games• Discussion groups

Page 10: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of
Page 11: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

ResultsWeb usage of E-learning components

Frequency Distribution of Usage

Page 12: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Results

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

stu

de

nts

Number of simulations

Frequency Usage of Simulations (26)

Page 13: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Results

Number of presentations

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

stu

de

nts

Frequency Usage of Presentations (16)

Page 14: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Asynchronous discourse

• 60% of the students participated passively.

Results

Types of Activity in the Forums

Forum activity

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

stu

de

nts

Page 15: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Students' learning style preferences

• The individual learning preferences of the students

were Visual, Sensing, Active and Sequential.

Results

Page 16: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

SensoryIntuitive

VisualVerbal

ActiveReflective

SequentialGlobal

Page 17: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Correlations between Web usage and learning stylesResults

Page 18: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Conclusions• Students preferred Power Point Presentations by far.

• Large Variability among students in using E-learning

components (Peled & Rashty, 1999).

• The individual learning preferences of the students were

Visual, Sensing, Active and Sequential (Felder & Brent,

2005).

Page 19: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

• Students with a Visual preference tended to use more

multimedia items (Zywno, 2003).

• Students categorized as having a Sensing learning

style were more active participants in the online

forums and visited the course Web site more often.

• These findings are not surprising, and are consistent

with the Felder Model construct (Felder & Silverman,

1988).

• Learning Styles explain less than 10% of the Variance.

Conclusions

Page 20: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

“I’m an Abstract-Sequential learner. Please conduct yourself accordingly!”

Page 21: WEB USAGE AND LEARNING STYLES IN AN ACADEMIC COURSE Moshe Leiba Rafi Nachmias Knowledge Technology Lab Science and Technology Education Center School of

Thank You!

Moshe Leiba [email protected]

Rafi Nachmias [email protected]