we call g stthan - cuhk mathematics · 2020. 9. 30. · def let d andg ke 2 metrics definedon e c...

6
Def let d and g ke 2 metrics defined on E c We call g is stthan d or d is neater than if if I 0 Sit dex y E C g Cx y F x y c I They are equivalent if g is stronger and weaker than d ie 7 Cs Cz o set dex y E C pay E C du y F X y c I 2 or c dex y E g ex y E a daisy7 My c E Prof d If f is stronger than d then Haig converges in CE g vinplies Hag converges in E d and hence the same bin it 2 If f is equivalent to d then Kris converges in g if and only if I ing conoerges in C E d 3 equivalent of metrics defined above b an equivalent relation Pf Easy ex

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Def let d and g ke2 metrics defined on E

    c We call g is stthan d or d is neaterthan if if I 0 Sit

    dexy E CgCxy F x yc I

    They are equivalent if g is stronger andweaker than d ie 7 Cs Cz o set

    dex y E C pay E C duy F X yc I

    2

    or c dex y E gex y E a daisy7 MycE

    Prof d If f is stronger than d then

    Haig converges in CE g vinplies

    Hag converges in E dand hence

    the same bin it2 If f isequivalent to d then Krisconverges in g if and only if I ingconoerges in C E d

    3 equivalent ofmetrics defined aboveb an equivalent relation

    Pf Easy ex

  • Cf Oa IR d y ElXi Yi

    dux y El Xi yayJkmqxlxiyildcocx.gs

    Checkc's day sin day Ern ddY9

    cis's diary E n day End c b

    Therefore di da do are equivalent metrics

    on IR

    ef E Cta b d Cf g S If 91

    discs g megaby If 91

    Then clearly

    diff S E b a duct S3 Ffg C Cta bJ

    dos is stronger than dis

    However it is airpossible to find C o set

    d Csg E Cd Cf g V fgtc a.br

  • If Before fa on Fa b 10,1

    fa x e fMX th X CEoat

    h

    To X Ent B

    o 1

    Then d Cfu D f lfat In 70 as n too

    dasCfn 0 EggHonkyn

    i n d Cfn O E C d Hn o Ean th

    which is utopasibled is not stronger than da

    Therefore di ados are not equivalent

    Def let fi CE d CF g be a mapping between

    2 metric spaces and X E E We call f

    is continuity at x if

    f Ha fix in CT fwhenever Xu x in Ed

    It a continuous on a set E CE f it is continuous

    at every pointof E

  • Proper let filk d T g be a mapping between 2metric spaces and XoC E Then

    f 5 continuous at Xo

    t E so I 870 such that

    I f Cfcs fexo s E F Xwith dasXo Ef

    Pf Ex

    Propes i let f tx d CFge

    g e CFp Z m

    are mappings between metric spaces

    9 If f is continuous atx e gis centaicas atfag

    then go f I d Z mis contineous at x

    If f is Is in E and g is ctsin'T

    then gof is is in E

    Pf Easy

  • Eg let fE d be a metricspace ACE AFORefire PA I R by

    Saks imf dayx

    YEAdistance from X to the subset A

    Clad I faks pacy I E da y tx YEE

    PIifclain For fixed ye E

    Bydefn of PATH

    HE 0 I 2C A set PA t E de y

    Hence fax s de X E du y digitday Pacy E

    faced facy s dcx.gsE

    Interchanging therolesof X y

    fab PAIDs dasyste

    Therefore 1pA paly I s d ItE

    Sina E 0 is arbitrary IPAID falystEdgy

  • By claim dan x o fauns Paks

    is dR b cts

    In fact Pa is Lipschitzcontinuous

    The example shows that there are many cts

    functions on a metric space

    Notation Usually we use the following notations

    das F tuff dayy y EF

    dCE F infldcyy X EE DEF

    for subsets Ee F