waynesville r-vi comprehensive school improvement plan€¦ · august 2014 may 2015 12/9- evidence...

Brian Henry WAYNESVILLE R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT | 200 FLEETWOOD DR, WAYNESVILLE, MO 65583

Waynesville R-VI Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Vision: Excel as student-centered community of learners that embraces diversity

and innovation.

Pag

e1

Pag

e2

Vision:

Excel as student-centered community of learners that embraces diversity and

innovation.

Collective Commitments:

● Decisions are based on the best interests of students

● Embrace diversity

● Welcoming environment

● Technology enhanced schools and learning

● Embracing new and innovative strategies for learning

Mission:

Educating individual students for 21st

Century Challenges.

Collective Commitments:

● Project based and critical thinking focus

● Developing students that are college and career ready through rigorous coursework and developing

career interests throughout schooling (K-12)

● A focus on collaboration and communication for students and faculty

Core Values:

● Community of Diversity

● Student- and Stakeholder-driven Quality

● Continuous Improvement and Learning

Pag

e3

Table of Contents:

Student Learning- CCR 1-

Student Learning- CCR 2- Page 6

Student Learning- Instructional Strategies 1- Page 8



Student Learning- Literacy 1- Page 15



Student Learning- Climate- Page 21

Student Learning- High Quality Teachers 1- Page 24

Student Learning- High Quality Teachers 2- Page 25

Student Learning- Training- Page 26

Technology 1- Page 28



Communications 1- Page 34

Communications 2- Page 36

Systems- Page 37

Governance- Page 39

Leadership- Page 41

Facilities- 1- Page 43

Facilities- 2- Page 45

Appendix A- Page 47

Appendix B- Page 49

Appendix C- Page 51

Appendix D- Page 54

Pag

e4

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/College and Career Readiness- 1

CSIP Goal: Optimize student learning through effective school improvement initiatives (curriculum, assessment, instruction, and organizational development).

Strategy: Develop and enhance educational/instructional programs for students to improve the quality of their performance and enable students to meet their personal,

academic, and career goals.

SMART Objective: The number of graduating seniors enrolled in advanced coursework (as determined by MSIP 5) and/or career and technical coursework with a

Technology Skills Assessment TSA) will increase from 40% in 2014 to 70% in 2017.

2014 Baseline:

2014-2015- 40% of Seniors enrolled in Advanced

Coursework/Courses with approved TSA

2015:50% of

graduating seniors

will have taken

advanced

coursework as

determined by MSIP

5.

2016: 60% of

graduating seniors

will have taken

advanced

coursework as

determined by MSIP

5.

2017: 70% of graduating seniors will have taken advanced

coursework as determined by MSIP 5.

Results:

Results: 51.7% Results: Results:

Indicator

Preparing students for college and post-secondary

pursuits.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for

Instructional

Services

MSIP Standard

Standard 3.4

Instruction 6

Instruction 9

AdvancED Standard

Standard 1

Standard 3

21st Century Skill

Learning and Innovation

Life and Career Skills

Building Indicator:

Building SMART Objective:

Action Steps 15-16 Implementation Completion Monitoring

1 An annual career fair including information on the

importance of planning post-secondary education,

military enlistment, or employment will occur and

students from each grade level will be able to attend.

August 2015 May 2016 12/9- Middle School is utilizing “Future You” days, where local

professionals speak with students. There is no evidence of high

school career fair or planning of a fair at this time.

2 Access to higher levels of rigor in coursework will

expand at the 6th-12th grade level and preparatory

coursework will be open to all students.

Ongoing Ongoing 12/9- NMSI has expanded offerings at the high school level but

little sequencing coursework at the middle level has been created

at this time.

Pag

e5

3 Expand the number of career education courses

offering an approved Technical Skills Attainment exam

(or IRC) at WCC.

Ongoing Ongoing

Long-Term Action Steps Implementation Completion Progress Report

Implementation of additional college preparatory

programs (e.g. International Baccalaureate).

Expand AP offerings at the high school level to include

all courses offered through AP.

Ongoing May 2016

Provide a variety of options for students to earn

credits beyond the traditional route to graduation, by

incorporating the following: online learning,

career/workplace learning: Revised at-risk/alternative

school model focused on early intervention and credit

recovery, MSU/OTC/WR6 partnership for criminal

justice degree, other partnerships with post-secondary

institutions.

Ongoing May 2016

Implemented and Monitoring

Students will create a 6 year personal plans of study

(or academic pathway) beginning in Middle School.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Evidence at middle school level and planning to extend the

process to high school has occurred.

Expand AP offerings at the high school level. August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Human Geography, AP Biology, AP Computer Science, AP

Environmental Science and AP Chemistry were added for this

school year.

Deadlines and rationale for dropping advanced courses

will be strictly enforced.

Ongoing Ongoing 12/9- This has been enforced and is ongoing.

Exposure to advanced and career course offerings will

increase at the 6th grade level.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Ongoing and occurring currently being implemented.

Pag

e6

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/College and Career Readiness- 2




SMART Objective: The composite score for ACT will increase from 21.4 in 2014 to 22.4 in 2017.

2014 Baseline:

2015: A composite

ACT score of 21.9

2016: A

composite

ACT score of

22.1

2017: A composite ACT score of 22.4

Results:

Results: Results: Results:

Indicator

Preparing students for college and post-secondary pursuits.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for

Instructional Services

MSIP

Standard

Standard 3.1-

3

Instruction 6

Instruction 9

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 3

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:



1 Create an academic recognition (e.g. Hall of Fame,

distinguished scholars, etc.) program at WHS/WMS and

prominently display names of students receiving high ACT

scores.

August 2015 Ongoing 6/1- Complete; ongoing efforts to recognize student

achievement; Need to initiate program at WMS.

2 Secondary integration of ACT standards to prepare all

students for the ACT exam in all content areas.

August 2015 Ongoing

Pag

e7



Provide ACT prep sessions immediately preceding an ACT

Test date.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Multiple sessions offered during regular school hours this

year. A CCR Preparatory course will be added for the 15-16

school year.

Design and implement an ACT preparatory course for high

school students.

August 2015 Ongoing

Incorporate ACT standards into advanced course curriculum

at the high school level.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- This has been implemented (need artifact such as a course

syllabus).

Pag

e8

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/Instructional Strategies- 1


Strategy: Develop and enhance educational/instructional programs for students to improve the quality of their performance and enable students to meet their personal, academic,

and career goals.

SMART Objective:

1. A maximum of three identified instructional strategies will be identified for each school building and ongoing training for these strategies will occur during each district

professional development day.

2. An action research/data teams process will be implemented for one of the identified building instructional strategies and student progress toward an this strategy will be

monitored utilizing local common pre- and post-assessment to determine effectiveness.

3. A minimum of 50% growth (or .5 on the standards-based scale) will occur for 80% of students from pre- to post-assessment.

2014 Baseline:

Baseline monitoring of district common

assessment data at the building level.

2015:

80% of our students will

score 70% or better (2.5

or better) on district

common post-

assessments.

2016:

80% of our students

will score 75% or

better (3.0 or better)

on district common

post-assessments.

2017:

80% of our students will score 80% or better (3.0 or better) on district

common post-assessments.

Results: Results: 79.75 at a 3 or

better

Results: Results:

Indicator

The district will promote and enhance

effective instructional strategies to improve

student learning.

District/Building Person

Accountable

Assistant Superintendent

for Instructional Services

MSIP Standard

Standard 1

Standard 2

Standard 3

Teaching/Learning 2

Instruction 1

AdvancE

D

Standar

d

Standar

d 1

Standar

d 3

Standar

d 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:



Pag

e9

1 Peer observation and descriptive feedback will

be utilized in all buildings to disseminate

identified effective practices.

August 2014 Ongoing 12/9- Evidence in several sites (Williams, Wood, Thayer)

2 Peer observation, reflection, and feedback will

become an expectation for all faculty.

August 2014 May 2016

3 Focus on utilizing data to inform instruction. August 2015 May 2016

4 As part of the RTI process, each building will

fully integrate a flex-grouping model through

systemic intervention time where students

receive support from identified effective

teachers aligned to a specific learning

standard.

Ongoing May 2016 12/9- Implemented at the elementary level but not fully at the secondary

level.

5 Action research based on effective

instructional strategies will be embedded in

all buildings. Possible move to action step?


6 Local common pre- and post-assessment data

will be utilized to monitor student learning

toward a standard and an identified

instructional strategy.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Much higher implementation across district; however, a few buildings

continue to rely almost exclusively on STAR data.



Each building will identify a maximum of three

instructional strategies to develop, support,

and monitor.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Yes, throughout district.

Pag

e10





SMART Objective: 1. Student super subgroup performance on state assessments will increase from 347 MPI in ELA and 345 MPI in Math in 2014 to 385.7 MPI in ELA and

392.8MPI in Math in 2017. *Note- Each building will be required to address areas of largest subgroup performance gap

2014 Baseline:

ELA- 347

MATH- 345

2015:

ELA- 379.7

MATH- 386

2016:

ELA- 382.7

MATH- 389

2017:

ELA- 385.7

MATH- 392.8

Results:

Results:

ELA- 345.3

Results: Results:

Indicator

The district will identify instructional strategies

and effective Response to Intervention strategies

to address achievement gaps in identifiable

student subgroups, specifically special needs

students.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for

Instructional

Services

MSIP Standard

Standard 2

Instruction 1

Instruction 2

Instruction 3

Governance 6

AdvancED Standard

Standard 1

Standard 3

Standard 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:


Action Steps 15-16 Implementati

on

Completion Monitoring

1 Expand research and investigation of strategies to

positively impact learning for various subgroups.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Not fully implemented. Several buildings are looking at the SPED

subgroup; however, few strategies or plans have been submitted.

2 Establish community focus groups to determine specific

needs of our various subgroups.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Not complete.

3 Each building will disaggregate state performance data,

identify subgroups needing the greatest assistance, and

design a building action plan to address the needs of

this group.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Not complete, limited evidence at the building level.

4 Each building will fully integrate a flex-grouping model

through systemic intervention time where students

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- In the process of full implementation at the elementary, some evidence at

the secondary level mostly in content area tutorials and homework support.

Pag

e11

receive support from identified effective teachers

aligned to a specific learning standard.

5 Locally developed common assessments will be a key

indicator in monitoring growth of students in the

intervention process.

May 2016

Long-Term Action Steps Implementati

on

Completion Progress Report

Co-teaching and other models to expose students with

specific learning disabilities will be embedded in all

buildings.

May 2017


Pag

e12





SMART Objective:

1. Student performance in English Language Arts will improve from 363.2 MPI in 2014 to the Top 10 by 2020 target of 385.7 MPI in 2017.

2. Student performance in Mathematics will improve from 360.1 MPI in 2014 to the Top 10 by 2020 target of 392.8 MPI in 2017.

3. Student performance in Science will improve from 345.5 MPI in 2014 to the Top 10 by 2020 target of 352.8 MPI in 2017.

4. Student performance in Social Studies will improve from 365.8 MPI in 2014 to the Top 10 by 2020 target of 375 MPI in 2017.

2014 Baseline:

ELA MPI- 363.2

Math MPI- 360.1

Science MPI- 345.5

Social Studies MPI- 365.8

2015:

ELA MPI

Math MPI-

Science MPI

Social Studies

2016:

ELA MPI-

Math MPI-

Science MPI-

Social Studies MPI-

2017:

ELA MPI-

Math MPI-

Science MPI-

Social Studies MPI-

Results:

Results:

ELA MPI- 366.7

Math MPI- 324.4

Science MPI- 368.6

Social Studies- 390.1

Results: Results:

Indicator

Monitor the implementation of school

and instructional improvement

strategies.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for


MSIP Standard

Standard 1

Teaching/Learning

2

Instruction 1

Instruction 5

AdvancE

D

Standar

d

Standar

d 1

Standar

d 3

Standar

d 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:


Pag

e13


1 District curriculum for core content

teams will be aligned to identified power

standards with scoring templates and

common pre- and post-assessments.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- K-6, alignment and common assessment is taking place, limited at the 7-12

level.

2 Standards-based grading will continue to

be utilized to communicate progress

toward meeting expectations to students

and parents (K-6). Secondary teams (7-

12) will be identified to research and

analyze the application of standards-

based grading at the secondary level.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- K-6, standards-based fully implemented. Pilot teams have not been officially

established at the secondary level, but some unofficial groups are working at the

secondary level.

3 Each building will design a building school

improvement plan through collaboration

with the building faculty that includes

clear objectives for student performance

and growth in literacy (at the grade

level), Algebra (or Algebra strands at the

elementary level), and Science

(specifically Biology at the high school

level).

August 2014 May 2015 2016 12/9- BSIPs have been created in each building. Literacy is covered in all BSIP plans,

specific Algebra Strands have not been covered in all plans, and specific Science

Strands have not been identified in all plans.

4 At the secondary level, targeted

improvements/interventions will be

designed for the Algebra content area.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Attempt to realign Algebra course sequencing is occurring.

Pag

e14


Elective/encore teams will engage in the

curriculum design process.



Each building will fully implement the

Professional Learning Community model

and engage in frequent/ongoing

collaboration.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Yes and ongoing.

District officials will conduct quarterly

reviews of building school improvement

plans and student progress data.


Structured support will be provided to

buildings that are struggling to meet

targets.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Yes and ongoing.

Pag

e15

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/Literacy- 1




SMART Objective: Based on student survey data, interest in reading will improve by the following targets:

● 3-5th- from 75% favorable in 2014 to 90% in 2017.



2014 Baseline:

3-5TH- 75%

6-8TH- 52%

9-12TH- 48%

2015:

3-5th- 80%

6-8th- 62%

9-12th- 53%

2016: *Each

building will

give a reading

survey.

3-5th- 85%

6-8th- 70%

9-12th- 60%

2017:

3-5th- 90%

6-8th- 75%

9-12th- 65%

Results:


Indicator

The district will design programming to support student

interest and desire to read.

District/Building

Person

Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent

for Instructional

Services

MSIP

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 2

Instruction 1

Advanc

ED

Standar

d

Standar

d 1

Standar

d 3

Standar

d 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:



Pag

e16

1 Provide time for recreational reading during the school

day that does not require quizzing or assessment.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- This is occurring in many buildings (HS, MS, 6th Grade, Wood); however,

it is not universal.

2 Utilizing an interest inventory, increase personal interest

materials for students through the Library Media

Centers.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- This has occurred in most buildings.

3 Reading incentives not tied to Reading Counts

Accelerated Reader quizzes. Examples include: Book it,

Six Flags Reward Trip, and Pizza Hut Reading Coupons for

work outside of the AR program.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Limited evidence.

4 Develop a user-friendly tracking system to monitor this

area.

August 2015 Ongoing


Team/school based incentives for reading that

encourage reading outside of computerized quizzes will

be designed (i.e. students will read material of interest,

respond in writing, and random writing responses will be

pulled for reward or whole grade levels/buildings will

have friendly competitions on the number of books

read).

Ongoing


Faculty will model a love for reading by reading and/or

discussing books with students of all ages.

Pag

e17





SMART Objective:

1. 80% of students will read on or above grade level (as determined by scaled score range) by the end of the school year in grades K-6. The district will utilize the STAR

assessment to determine reading level.

2. 70% of students 7-12 will be reading on grade level (as determined by scaled score range) by the end of the school year.

2014 Baseline:

2015:

Elementary- 70%

Secondary- 60%

2016:

Elementary- 75%

Secondary- 65%

2017:

Elementary- 80%

Secondary- 70%

Results:

Results:

Elementary 78%

HS- 57%

MS- 59%

Results: Results:

Indicator

The district will design programming

to improve student reading levels.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for

Instructional

Services

MSIP Standard

Standard 1

Standard 2

Instruction 1

Teacher/Leader 2

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 3

Standard 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:



1 Fully implement the balanced literacy

model in elementary classrooms.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Not fully implemented.

2 Fully implement new reading series

to support balanced literacy.


3 Provide teacher training to support

the balanced literacy process.

August 2015 Ongoing

Pag

e18



Provide reading support through

district coaching and/or external

experts.


Pag

e19





SMART Objective:

1. 80% of students will score proficient or better on the final district constructed-response assignment.

2014 Baseline:

2015: 80% 2016: 80% 2017: 80%

Results:

Results: Not met Results: Results:

Indicator

The district will design and implement a

consistent writing process.

District/Building

Person

Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent

for Instructional

Services

MSIP Standard

Standard 1

Standard

Teacher/Leader

2

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 3

Standard 5

21st Century Skill



Building Indicator:



1 Students will be assigned a grade-

appropriate performance event scored by

the district performance event rubric each

semester.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Not completed but will begin work 2nd Semester.

2 Reading and writing standards within the

Missouri Learning Standards will be

integrated into Science, Social Studies, and

the Technical Subjects. Cross curricular

teaching will be emphasized during PLC

collaboration time.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Not complete. This has occurred at the 6th grade center in Science and Social

Studies

Pag

e20

3 District level extended response rubric will

this be addressed through the 6 Traits

process used in the new language series.

January 2015 May 2016


Identify a consistent writing program to be

administered K-12 that sequences necessary

writing skills from Kindergarten through the

12th grade.

August 2014


District-wide collaborative scoring

opportunities will be implemented based on

a common rubric aligned to the level of rigor

required by the Missouri Learning

Standards.


Elementary buildings will administer a

minimum of 1 writing assignment per

quarter utilizing the district constructed-

response rubric for all students.


Secondary buildings will administer a

minimum of 1 writing assignment per

quarter utilizing the district constructed-

response rubric for all students. One

department will be responsible for each

quarter (e.g. 1st quarter language arts, 2nd

quarter mathematics).

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Yes (with the exception of high school students, the CR is being given by content

area with the most recent).

Pag

e21

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/Climate- 1




SMART Objective: Each building will monitor climate through routine student surveys resulting in a 70% favorable rating on the district survey by 2017 (climate related survey

questions are as follows: Elementary- I like this school; Students are friendly; Secondary- My opinion is valued; There is a feeling of belonging at my school; Teachers care about

me; Teachers treat me with respect;

2014 Baseline:

Elementary- I like this school 68%

2015: 2016: 2017:

Elementary- Students are friendly 60%

Secondary- My opinion is valued MS-37%, HS-

26%

Secondary- There is a feeling of belonging at my

school 45%, 38%

Secondary- Teachers care about me 51%, 31%

Secondary- Teachers treat me with respect 60%,

45%

Results:

Results:

Results:

Results:

Pag

e22

Elementary- Students

are friendly 84%

Elementary-

Students are

friendly

Elementary- Students are friendly

Secondary- My opinion

is valued 37% 52%

Secondary- My

opinion is valued

Secondary- My opinion is valued

Secondary- Teachers

care about me 46%

52%

Secondary-

Teachers care

about me

Secondary- Teachers care about me

Secondary- Teachers

treat me with respect

30% 37%

Secondary-

Teachers treat me

with respect

Secondary- Teachers treat me with respect

Indicator

Each building in the Waynesville R-VI School

District will create a system to recognize and

support positive student behavior.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent for


MSIP Standard

Instruction 3

Instruction 7

Instruction 8

Instruction 9

AdvancED

Standard

Standard

1

Standard

3

21st Century Skill


Building Indicator:



1 At the secondary level, positive incentive system

will be established to recognize positive behavior

and will be communicated on a consistent basis

to the student body (e.g. a privilege system that

addresses each class at the high school level).

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Limited evidence at high school level, MS has made gains through the

positive referral system. In addition, WCC has added a student of the month

program.

Pag

e23

2 Strategies to increase student motivation in core

academic areas will be identified (e.g. student

self-monitoring and feedback).

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- In some building sites (list examples?).

3 Consistent behavior management system and

reduction in referrals in Special Education and

African American population


4 District level training behavior management and

discipline policy training for administrators


5 During DLT meetings, frequent monitoring of

disciplinary data by subgroup



Develop a culture that supports positive support

and school wellness.

August 2014


At the elementary level, PBIS will continue with

an additional focus on student involvement in

classroom procedures and school advisory.


Student attendance will be closely monitored and

the benefits of regular student attendance will be

emphasized throughout the district.


Interventions designed to assist students

struggling to meet behavioral expectations will be

developed in all buildings.


Pag

e24

Strategic Focus Area:

Student Learning

Action Plan: Student Learning/High Quality Teachers-1


Strategy: Recruit, attract, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to carry out the district mission, goals, and objectives.

SMART Objective: Each building in the Waynesville R-VI School District will create a pilot team to begin implementation of the new evaluation system with the target of full

implementation during the 2015-2016 school year.

2014 Baseline:

Implementation of 2 Indicators

2015:

Continue 2

indicators and

pilot SLO process

2016:

Design and

implementation

of additional 14

indicators

2017:

Completion of all indicators

Results:

Results:

Met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Pilot and begin full implementation of the

model evaluation system.

District/Building

Person

Accountable

Assistant

Superintendent

for Personnel

Services

MSIP Standard

Teacher/Leader

1

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 4

21st Century Skill



1 Revise the number of rubrics


Develop rubrics and ‘look fors” for the

eleven high quality indicators.


Develop rubrics and “look fors” for the

remaining 25 indicators.



Pag

e25

Strategic Focus Area: Student

Learning

Action Plan: Student Learning/High Quality Teachers- 2



SMART Objective: Implement a universal screening tool for certified staff and monitor performance of teachers given the highest rating to determine the effectiveness of

the system.

2014 Baseline:

Implement screener

2015:

Based on multiple criteria (TBD), 80% of the highest screened candidates are considered to be highly effective teachers.

Results:

Results:

Not met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Design and implement a screening

tool to identify the most highly

qualified applicants to the

Waynesville R-VI School District.


Accountable

Assistant Superintendent for

Personnel Services

MSIP Standard

Teacher/Leader 1

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 1

Standard 4

21st Century Skill



1 Implement rubric system for

screening candidates.

August 2014 May 2016 12/9- Not complete but looking at a new system.


Develop collaboration with local

colleges involved in teacher

education.


Monitor interview process. August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Ongoing.

Pag

e26

Strategic Focus Area: Student Learning Action Plan: Student Learning/Training- 1


Strategy: District Staff will be trained on best practice in their respective lines of work.

SMART Objective: The percentage of personnel reporting satisfaction on the district perceptual survey with the job specific training will increase to 80% by the year 2017.

2014 Baseline:

The in-service training activities I have

attended have helped me to a better

job- Classified- 66%

2015:

72%

2016:

75%

2017:

80%

Results:

Results:

Met- 85.3%

Results: Results:

Indicator

The Personnel Department will ensure

the development of quality training

programs that apply directly to the

primary job function of employees.


Accountable


Personnel Services/Assistant

Superintendent for Operational

Services/Assistant

Superintendent for


MSIP Standard

Teacher/Leade

r 1

AdvancED Standard

Standard 1

Standard 4

21st Century Skill


Building Indicator:



1 Utilizing directors/supervisors of district

classified employees, develop a training

schedule for each classified group that

applies directly to core job

responsibilities. Assistant

Superintendent for Operational Services

will collaborate with directors to

determine the necessary training.

August 2014 May 2015 2016 12/9- Classified staff interviewed have not expressed concern with current

training; however, this step continues to be monitored.

2 Survey classified faculty to identify

specific core job related needs.

August 2014 May 2015 2016 12/9- Discussed in on-site reviews.

Pag

e27

3 Through evaluation surveys, determine

the level of effectiveness of a particular

training.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- On district survey.



Pag

e28

Strategic Focus Area: Technology Action Plan: Technology- 1

CSIP Goal: Leverage technology as a strategic tool

Strategy: Develop and enhance quality educational/instructional programs to improve and enable students to meet their personal, academic, and career goals.

SMART Objective: The district technology curriculum will incorporate the requisite skills for online assessment.

2014 Baseline:

Identify all necessary skills and

create vertical alignment of

these skills for assessment

purposes.

2015:

Target 3 English

Language

Arts/Mathematics

Common Assessments to

be implemented in an

online form.

2016:

Target 6 English

Language

Arts/Mathematics

Assessments to be

implemented in an

online format.

2017:

Results: Results:

HS- Met

MS- Not met

Elementary- Not met

Results: Results:

Indicator

District technology curriculum

standards will be aligned to the

ISTE and revised to align with

the skills necessary for on-line

state assessment PK-12.


Accountable

Director of Instructional

and Media Technology

MSIP Standard

Instruction 10

Instruction 11

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 4

21st Century Skill

Information, Media and Technology Skills

Building Indicator:



1 Technology checklist based on

ISTE for students will be

developed and implemented

into the curriculum at all grade

levels.

August 2014 May 2016 12/17-Checklists are currently posted on District Web Page. They will be review

and updated as needed. Grades 7-12 proficiency scales need developed for

technology or does technology develop these?

Pag

e29

2 Technology curriculum will be

aligned to encompass the

necessary skills for online

assessment.

August 2014 May 2015 12/17-Reporting Topics for grades K-6 have been updated on Report Cards.

Proficiency scales will be developed.

5/6-Proficiency scales have been developed for K-6 and are located in District

Share Point scales will be developed.

3 Purchase interactive assessment

tools to support online

assessment.


Provide opportunities to practice

online assessments.

Evidence of online assessments at some grade/course levels


Technology curriculum will be

reviewed yearly to adjust for

technology change.

Ongoing Ongoing 12/17-Ongoing

Pag

e30

Strategic Focus Areas: Technology Action Plan: Technology 2

CSIP Goal: Leverage technology as a strategic tool Strategy: Provide and maintain appropriate instructional resources, support services, and safe facilities.

SMART Objective: By 2017, all teachers will implement a technology enhanced lesson (at the progressive or advanced levels) a minimum of 4 times in a school year.

2014 Baseline: Through administrative walk through observation and monitoring of lesson plans, determine the number of lessons utilizing technology to the progressive/advanced levels are occurring.

2015: All faculty will implement a minimum of 2 progressive/advanced lessons.



Results:


Indicator The district will promote the effective use of technology during instruction and provide the necessary tools to enhance technology instruction.

District/Building Person Accountable

Director of Instructional and Media Technology

MSIP Standard Instruction 10 Instruction 11

AdvancED Standard Standard 4

21st Century Skill Information, Media and

Technology Skills

Building Indicator:



1 Building principals will require frequent use of student centered technology as appropriate and aligned to the district curriculum.

August 2014 May 2016 12/17- This step could be utilized in the new evaluation process. 5/6-Written into BSIP Plans...Need to develop plan to monitor progress.

Pag

e31

2 Secondary technology proficiency scales will be developed and utilized in technology courses.


3 Expand wireless access in buildings.



The district will move towards “cloud based” collaboration for storage of materials. The district will provide or allow file storage and application sharing to be carried outside of our local network.

August 2014 May 2017 12/17-Teachers have access to parts of Google Drive for file sharing/storage. 5/6-All Admin/Teachers have a District Google Drive Account. All students at WHS also have an account.

Increase student access to devices in the regular classroom.

August 2015


The district will continue to offer advanced (Level III) technology training for teachers.

August 2014 May 2015 12/17-Yes and Ongoing

Pag

e32


Technology

Action Plan: Technology- 3

CSIP Goal: Leverage technology as a strategic tool

Strategy: Provide and maintain appropriate instructional resources, support services, and safe facilities.

SMART Objective: Identify cost associated with technology upgrades and forecast this cost for 5 years ensuring the district remains at the forefront of technology.

2014 Baseline:

Conduct a detailed analysis of technology

upgrade needs as well as a needs

assessment to determine future

technology demands.

2015:

Completed

replacement cycle

and preliminary long-

range needs plan.

2016:

Monitor and provide feedback

regarding the district’s ability to

meet replacement and long-

range indicators.

2017:

Monitor and provide feedback regarding the district’s ability

to meet replacement and long-range indicators.

Results:

Results:

Met

Results: Results:

Indicator

The district will create a long-range

technology plan and replacement cycle to

support the integration of current

technology.

District/Building

Person Accountable

Director of

Instructional and

Media Technology

MSIP Standard

Instruction 10

Instruction 11

AdvancED Standard

Standard 4

21st Century Skill

Information, Media and Technology

Skills

Building Indicator:



1 A timeline and replacement cycle for

current district equipment will be

developed and distributed to necessary

personnel and district advisory teams.

August 2014 August 2016 12/17-In process, a draft document has been created.

5/6-A draft document has been developed and been shared

with Asst. Supt. of Operational Services and Coordinator of

Tech. System.

2 A long-range strategy for technology

integration will be developed.

August 2014 December 2016 12/17-In process

5/6-In process

Pag

e33



Equitable access to necessary technology

will be guaranteed across the district.

Ongoing Ongoing 12/17-Yes and ongoing

The district will ensure necessary

bandwidth/technology infrastructure to

support online testing and other necessary

educational activities.

August 2014 December 2014 12/17-Completed. We are currently at 500mb, which should

support online assessments.

5/6-Our 500mb of Bandwidth did support online testing.

Pag

e34

Strategic Focus Area: Communication Action Plan: Communications- 1

CSIP Goal: Improve communication to enhance the effectiveness and satisfaction of stakeholders

Strategy: Implement internal communication strategies, which support continuous school improvement.

SMART Objective: 90% of district patrons will receive written communication from the district a minimum of twice a school year.

2014 Baseline:

Pilot initial district magazine.

2015:

90% of patrons

receive one

written

communication

2016:

90%/receive one written

communication

2017:

90%/receive two written communications

Results:

Results:

Met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Improve, expand, and enhance the internal and

external communication and marketing

strategies to meet the needs of stakeholders.

District/Building

Person

Accountable

Director of

Communication

s and Marketing

MSIP Standard

Governance 8

Governance 9

AdvancED Standard

Standard 2

21st Century Skill

Building Indicator:



1 Maintain and update a key communicator and

frequent voter list and send monthly updates.

Ongoing

2 Open external communication subscription

option for updates to anyone interested.

August 2015 Ongoing

3 Magazine to be distributed to all stakeholders. Ongoing

4 Frequently communicate emergency parent

contact options/updates.

August 2015 Ongoing

Pag

e35


Research new automated parent message

systems.

Mr. Henson and Mrs. Ward evaluated an automated parent

system through Schoolwires in January 2015. Mr. Henson is

evaluating the cost and services compared to current system.


Develop a mobile app for the district website. 12/9- Completed.

Develop, maintain and update a key

communicator and frequent voter list and send

monthly updates.

Ongoing 12/9- Key communicator has been utilized, frequent voter

survey distributed in February and completed March 31, 2015

Pilot magazine to be distributed to all

stakeholders.

Ongoing Completed. Printed and distributed in March 2015 12/9-

Scheduled for 2nd Semester.

Develop and implement an emergency parent

communication protocol for educational

stakeholders.

Completed February 2015 .

Contract with outside vendor to develop survey

of stakeholders and parents attitudes related

to the school district.

Completed using in-house resources

Pag

e36

Strategic Focus Area: Communication Action Plan: Communications- 2

CSIP Goal: Communicate effectively to enhance the effectiveness and satisfaction of stakeholders

Strategy: Implement internal communication strategies, which support continuous school improvement.

SMART Objective: Increase external communication of news and other critical school information.

2014 Baseline:

A praise section for Tiger Tales will be

created and each building will be required

to publish one teacher story per quarter

and one principal story per quarter on the

district website.

2015:

Two teacher and

principal stories will be

published on the building

webpage per quarter.

2016:

Place news releases

on building website.

2017:

Place news releases on building website.

Results:

Results:

Not met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Increase, expand, and improve

opportunities for increasing parents and

students’ sense of belonging, engagement,

and communication.


Accountable

Director of

Communications and

Marketing

MSIP Standard

Governance 8

Governance 9

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 2

21st Century Skill

Building Indicator:



1 Promote positive aspects of attendance

with parents.

August 2014 Ongoing 12/9- Positive reinforcement for attendance occurring at Wood, Thayer,

Partridge, Freedom, and MS.

2 Teacher written stories displayed on the

website.

August 2014 August 2017 Progress is being made

3 Principals will place news releases on their

school website.

August 2014 August 2017 Done at all but WCC



Develop a praise feature for Tiger Tales. August 2014 August 2017 12/9- Yes and ongoing.

Pag

e37

Strategic Focus Area: Systems Action Plan: Systems- 1

CSIP Goal: Use a systems approach to management and measurement of the organization

Strategy: Adopt, implement, and assess a measurement, management, and communication tool, which supports continuous school improvement.

SMART Objective: The district will meet 80% of the CSIP SMART objectives.

2014 Baseline:

Establish baseline for the number of district SMART

objectives met.

2015:

60% of SMART

objectives will be

met.

2016:

70% of SMART objectives

will be met.

2017:

80% of SMART objectives will be met.

Results:

Results:

23 total

Currently- 8 met,

10- not met, 5-

waiting for data

*Objective will be

to reach 14/23 for

this year

Results: Results:

Indicator

Monitor, through the use of a scoring instrument,

building review process, and on-going data

(perceptual and performance, the growth of the

Waynesville R-VI School District toward a system of

interrelated and highly performing schools.

District/Building

Person

Accountable

Superintendent or

Designee

MSIP Standard

Governance 2

Governance 3

Governance 4

Governance 8

AdvancED Standard

Standard 2

Standard 4

21st Century Skill


1 Fully implement a scorecard for district tracking of

identified performance objectives.

August 2014 Ongoing 12/9- Template created and will be utilized at the end of the 2014-

2015 school year.

2 Provide a yearly overview of performance with

narrative for the general public.

May 2015 Ongoing 12/9- This will be included in the scorecard at the conclusion of the

school year.

3 Create a BSIP monitoring dashboard that aligns to

the district CSIP model.


Pag

e38



Review school-based performance toward district

performance objectives with building

administration.

August 2014 12/9- Yes and ongoing.

Provide supports as necessary for building and/or

system improvements to increase student

performance.

August 2014 12/9- Yes and ongoing.

Pag

e39

Strategic Focus Area: Governance Action Plan: Governance- 1

CSIP Goal: Support governance infrastructure

Indicator: Ensure a quality and efficient educational system through effective evaluation of personnel and programs, as well as recognizing teams and individuals

meeting district and building SMART Objectives.

SMART Objective: The Waynesville R-VI School District will reach 90% on the DESE Annual Performance Report.

2014 Baseline:

(2013- 82.1%)

(Preliminary 87.1%)

2015:

89%

2016:

90%

2017:

Results:


Indicator


Accountable

Superintendent and Board of

Education

MSIP Standard AdvancED Standard

Standard 2


1 Improving contact with

administration/teachers in a structured

design and positive manner (e.g. building

presentations to students, board members

reading to students, invitations to science

fairs).

August 2014 Ongoing- Review

June 2015

2 Review appropriate communication

channels for Board Members and

administration (e.g. Chain of

Communication/Command).


3 Publish and frequently communicate Board

norms (i.e. Board meeting agendas).

4 Communicate Board goals.

5 Provide more frequent Board professional

development.

Pag

e40



Support and develop personnel evaluation

system and modify to address district

needs.

August 2014 Ongoing- Review

June 2015

Create a meaningful program evaluation

process and utilize this process to identify

inefficiencies and allocate resources

effectively.

Design- August 2014

Implement- December 2014

Ongoing- Review

June 2015

Pag

e41

Strategic Focus Area: Leadership Action Plan: Leadership- 1

CSIP Goal: Leadership development and sustainment


SMART Objective: Perceptual evaluation surveys will indicate 80% satisfaction with professional development and leadership development activities.

2014 Baseline:

Perceptual surveys will be administered to all

faculty taking part in professional

development or leadership development

opportunities.

2015: 65% satisfaction

*Utilize PLC observation process to

measure data activities. On 60% of

Central Admin observations, some form

of collaborative activity will be based on

student performance data.


On 70% of Central Admin

observations, some form of

collaborative activity will be based

on student performance data.


On 80% of Central Admin observations, some

form of collaborative activity will be based on

student performance data.

Results:

Results:

Met- 85.3%

Results: Results:

Indicator


Superintendent/Assistant

Superintendent for Personnel Services

MSIP Standard AdvancED

Standard

Standard 2

21st Century Skill


1 Administrative PD focused on utilization of

data to inform instruction (book study and

discussion)

August 2015 June 2016

2 Administrative PD focused on providing

quality feedback during the evaluation

process (external provider 4 X throughout the

year)


3 Continue Aspiring Administrators Program

(have administrative assist during

investigation and assessing consequences for

serious offenses)


4 Increase activity supervision for aspiring

administrator.


5 Implement the designed evaluation process

for aspiring administrators with fidelity.


Pag

e42

6 Involve district assistant principals in the

district leadership team professional

development session as well as the

elementary/secondary principal meetings.


7 Develop and implement a PLC collaboration

rubric to be used in the observation of

building level collaboration. Share results with

building administrators, who will share with

their faculties.


The district will design a general leadership

program for faculty members interested in

opportunities other than building leadership.

August 2015

A new principal induction program will be

designed to support new leaders in the school

district.

August 2015


Certified staff will participate in leadership

training and professional development

through district instructional coaches and

external providers.

August 2014 Ongoing 12/9- Yes, aspiring administrators, various

training sessions through district coaches, and

the use of RPDC and Tim Brown (Solution

Tree). In addition, faculty members are

attending satellite leadership training.

Maintain and grow the Aspiring

Administrators Program

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Yes and ongoing (provide examples?).

Provide quality professional development for

district leaders.

August 2014 Ongoing 12/9- Yes, book study, monthly DLT meetings,

weekly updates.

Pag

e43

Strategic Focus Area: Facilities/Resources Action Plan: Facilities/Resources/Facilities- 1

CSIP Goal: Ensure optimum utilization of facilities

Strategy: Develop and implement a comprehensive and long-range facilities utilization plan.

SMART Objective: Completion of a long-range facilities plan, prioritized projects, and list of predictable outlay.

2014 Baseline:

2015: Completion of required

documents

2016: Monitor and

feedback

2017: Monitor and feedback

Results:

Results:

Met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Revise district long-range plan to address

continued improvements to district facilities

and maintaining the positive perception of

current district facilities.


Accountable


Operational Services

MSIP Standard

Governance 5

Governance 8

AdvancED Standard

Standard 4

21st Century Skill


1 Through the Operations Committee, explore

and implement methods to maximize energy

efficiency.


2 Implement utility usage reimbursement

program per building and in district

departments.


3 Develop written contingencies for facilities in

the event of further decline or increase in

enrollment (consolidation/expansion

possibilities).


4 Through the Operations Committee, develop

and review (yearly) a list of efficiencies in each

facility throughout the district (e.g. paper

usage, supplies, facility remodels and repairs,

etc.), as well as a timeline for capitalizing on

these efficiencies.


5 Develop a master plan for vacated facilities. August 2015 May 2016

Pag

e44

6 Establish a comprehensive maintenance plan

for all facilities and infrastructure.



Convene facility advisory committee. August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Completed.

Solicit input for a master plan for facilities and

prioritize need.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Completed and approved by BOE in Fall 2014.

Create a listing of predictable capital outlay

items that may be considered for budgeting

and/or replacement before failure.

August 2014 May 2015 12/9- Completed (need facilities plan and worksheet)

Pag

e45


Facilities/Resources

Action Plan: Facilities/Resources/Resources- 2

CSIP Goal: Closely monitor and support district status as a “heavily impacted” school district.

Strategy: Through involvement in state and national organizations, district officials will monitor and make necessary revisions to school data in an attempt to ensure district

status as a heavily impacted school district.

SMART Objective: Annual report of the district’s B2 status will be created and provided to district administration, Board of Education, and other applicable constituent

groups.

2014 Baseline:

Design and complete initial report

2015:

Annual reporting

2016:

Annual reporting

2017:

Annual reporting

Results:

Results:

Met

Results: Results:

Indicator

Monitor fluctuation in Fort Leonard Wood work

force to inform financial and personnel decision

making.



Operational Services/Superintendent

MSIP Standard

Governance 5

Resource 4

Resource 5

Resource 6

Resource 7

AdvancED

Standard

Standard 4

21st Century Skill

2014-2015 Action Steps Implementation Completion Monitoring

1 In conjunction with district communication

department, develop a series of informational

materials/presentations to explain district funding

and the potential need for increased local effort.

The information will be concise, focused on clear

points, and designed for public consumption.


2 Schedule meetings with key groups in the

community, including Fort Leonard Wood to

explain our revenue streams.

August 2015 Ongoing

3 Develop a small team of key communicators to

discuss aspects of the funding system and the

potential need for increased local effort.

August 2015 Ongoing

4 Expand efforts to monitor students moving from

the community to Fort Leonard Wood and verify

August 2015 Ongoing

Pag

e46

their status is corrected in the system to ensure a

higher Impact Aid weight.

5 Add National Guard/Reserve to registration form

to capture these numbers for Impact Aid

purposes.

August 2015 Ongoing



Engage in local civic groups that work for the

sustainability of FLW and the district’s B2 status.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Yes and ongoing. SOP, LWI, Chamber.

Engage in state and national professional

organizations and opportunities that monitor and

support FLW and the district’s B2 status.

August 2014 ongoing 12/9- Yes and ongoing. NAFIS, MIC3, MISA, MMPEC.

Pag

e47

Appendix A

Terminology Utilized on Action Plans

Each district action plan includes the following elements:

Strategic Focus Area: Improvement areas identified through strategic planning process.

CSIP Goal: Goal for improvement in Strategic Focus Area.

Strategy: Broad strategy for achieving CSIP Goal.

SMART Objective: A measureable indicator of progress (Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely) toward the CSIP

Goal.

Annual Target and Results: Benchmarks utilized to gauge annual progress.

Indicator: A succinct description of why the proposed actions/activities are appropriate/relevant

District Person(s) Accountable: The district-level person responsible for implementation and deployment of the strategy

MSIP Standard(s): The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education implements the Missouri School

Improvement Program as a roadmap to school improvement. The MSIP and associated achievement, program, and resource

standards is currently administered in its fifth revision. An overview of the MSIP 5 Standards can be found at

http://www.dese.mo.gov/qs/documents/MSIP-5-comprehensive-guide-3-13.pdf

AdvancED Standards: The AdvancEd Standards for Quality School Systems are comprehensive statements of quality practices

and conditions that research and best practice indicate are necessary for school districts to achieve quality student performance

and organizational effectiveness. By reaching higher levels of implementation of the standards, greater capacity to support

ever-increasing student performance and organizational effectiveness is developed. Each of the standards are described more



Pag

e48

fully in the CSIP appendix and have been cross-referenced with objectives throughout the CSIP to maintain focus on each

standard over the next three years.

21st Century Challenges: The Partnership for 21st Century Skills has created a Framework for 21st Century Learning which

describes the knowledge, skills and expertise students must master to succeed in work and life. It presents a vision for 21st

century student outcomes (blending of content knowledge, specific skills, expertise and literacies) and the support systems that

are needed to produce these outcomes. The Comprehensive School Improvement Plan cross-references improvement

strategies to these outcomes and support systems which are identified in the CSIP as 21st Century Challenges. The Framework

for 21st Century Learning is described more fully in the appendix of this document.

Implementation Date: The date the action/activity will be implemented.

Completion Date: The date the action/activity will be completed.

Description of Action/Activity (Long & Short-Term): A succinct statement of an action/activity used to achieve the

identified SMART Objective.

Pag

e49

Appendix B

AdvancED Standards for Quality School Systems

Standard 1: Purpose and Direction

The system maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous

improvement that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and

learning.

Alignment to Waynesville R-VI School Improvement Plan:

● Vision and Mission Statements

● Collective Commitments

● Student Learning Focus Area

Standard 2: Governance and Leadership

The system operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school

effectiveness.



● Governance Focus Area

● Leadership Focus Area

● Systems Focus Area

Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning

The system’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and

student learning across all grades and courses.

Pag

e50




Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems

The system has resources and provides services in all schools that support its purpose and direction to ensure

success for all students.


● Facilities/Resources Focus Area

Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement

The system implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning

and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.




Pag

e51

Appendix C

Framework for 21st Century Learning

Core Subjects and 21st Century Themes

Mastery of core subjects and 21st century themes is essential to student success. Core subjects include English, reading or

language arts, world languages, arts, mathematics, economics, science, geography, history, government and civics.

In addition, schools must promote an understanding of academic content at much higher levels by weaving 21st century

interdisciplinary themes into core subjects:

• Global Awareness

• Financial, Economic, Business and Entrepreneurial Literacy

Pag

e52

• Civic Literacy

• Health Literacy

• Environmental Literacy

Learning and Innovation Skills

Learning and innovation skills are what separate students who are prepared for increasingly complex life and work

environments in today’s world and those who are not. They include:

• Creativity and Innovation

• Critical Thinking and Problem Solving

• Communication and Collaboration

Information, Media and Technology Skills

Today, we live in a technology and media-driven environment, marked by access to an abundance of information, rapid changes

in technology tools and the ability to collaborate and make individual contributions on an unprecedented scale. Effective citizens

and workers must be able to exhibit a range of functional and critical thinking skills, such as:

• Information Literacy

• Media Literacy

• ICT (Information, Communications and Technology) Literacy


Today’s life and work environments require far more than thinking skills and content knowledge. The ability to navigate the

complex life and work environments in the globally competitive information age requires students to pay rigorous attention to

developing adequate life and career skills, such as:

• Flexibility and Adaptability

• Initiative and Self-Direction

• Social and Cross-Cultural Skills

Pag

e53

• Productivity and Accountability

• Leadership and Responsibility

21st Century Support Systems

Developing a comprehensive framework for 21st century learning requires more than identifying specific skills, content

knowledge, expertise and literacies. An innovative support system must be created to help students master the multi-

dimensional abilities that will be required of them. The Partnership has identified five critical support systems to ensure student

mastery of 21st century skills:

• 21st Century Standards

• Assessments of 21st Century Skills

• 21st Century Curriculum and Instruction

• 21st Century Professional Development

• 21st Century Learning Environments

Pag

e54

Appendix D

WAYNESVILLE R-VI SCHOOL DISTRICT

Comprehensive Program Evaluation Schedule

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

JULY

Homeless

Migrant

Federal

Programs Homeless

Migrant

Federal

Programs Summer School

Special Ed.

Homeless

Migrant

AUGUST

Grant Funded

Programs Grant Funded

Programs

SEPTEMBER

Facilities/

Grounds

Early

Childhood

Programs

Facilities/

Grounds

Early

Childhood

Programs

Facilities/

Grounds

OCTOBER

Transportation Library Media Transportation Library Media Transportation

NOVEMBER

Health Special Ed. Health Special Ed. Health

DECEMBER

Volunteer

Program

Wellness

Wellness Volunteer

Program

Wellness

Wellness Wellness

Pag

e55

JANUARY

Career Tech Ed. Technology

Library Media

Career Tech Ed. Technology

Library Media

Career Tech Ed.

FEBRUARY

Community

Involvement Crisis

Management Community

Involvement Crisis

Management Community

Involvement

MARCH

Gifted ESL Gifted ESL Gifted

APRIL

Food Service Remedial

Reading Food Service Remedial

Reading Food Service

MAY

School Climate PD

SOS

School Climate PD

SOS

School Climate

JUNE

Guidance Alternative

Program

At risk

Guidance Alternative

Program

At risk

Guidance

Pag

e56

Waynesville R-VI School District Programs Evaluation, Reports, and Business Schedule

Program/Business Responsible Month Comp. School Improvement Plan Summer School Program Annual Discipline Report

Superintendent Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

July

Advisory Committees Tax Rate Tuition Rate Prelim MAP Results

Superintendent Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

August

Enrollment Data Facilities Program APR Early Childhood/PAT

Superintendent Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

September

Audit Approval Transportation Route Approval Progress Report/CA and Rdg.

Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

October

Board Candidate Filing Dates MSBA Policy Service Renewal

Superintendent Superintendent

November

Fall Sports MUSIC Renewal/Claims Course Description HS Volunteer Program

Athletic Director Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Community Resource Coordin.

December

MSBA Board Recognition School Year Calendar Budget Revision Election Ballot Certification Mid-year Progress

Superintendent Superintendent Asst. Supt. Operational Services Superintendent Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

January

Summer School Program Textbook Adoption Staffing Plan 1st Rdg Employee Handbook Rev 1st Rdg

Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Asst. Supt. Personnel Services Asst. Supt. Personnel Services

February

Pag

e57

CSIP Monitor Superintendent

Staffing Plan Approval Employee Handbooks District Safety/Crisis Mgmt Salary Schedule Recommend

Asst. Supt. Personnel Services Asst. Supt. Personnel Services Superintendent Superintendent

March

Winter Sports Program Student Handbooks Impact Aid Update Employee Insurance Program District Assessment Plan

Athletic Director Superintendent Superintendent Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services

April

Transportation Employee Hndbk. Curriculum Guides Professional Learning Plan Student Discipline

Asst. Supt. Operational Services Dir. Of Instruct Media/Tech Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Superintendent

May

Proposed Budget Board Meeting Schedule Spring Sports Program Transportation Route Approval Food Services/Price Setting Achievement Report/Reading Special Education Report/ Assurance Statement

Asst. Supt. Operational Services Superintendent Athletic Director Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Operational Services Asst. Supt. Instructional Services Special Services Director

June

Annual Personnel

Superintendent

Board of Education

January

Central Office Level Assistant

Superintendent s, Directors and

Coordinators

Superintendent and Asst.

Superintendents

February

Pag

e58

Building Level Directors and

Principals and Asst. Principals

Superintendent and Building

Principals

March

Other Certified Staff Directors and Principals March or April

Support Staff Superintendent, Asst. Supts.,

Directors, Coordinators,

Building Principals and Directors

May

waynesville r-vi comprehensive school improvement plan€¦ · august 2014 may 2015 12/9- evidence...

Documents