WATO SECKtT " ~ sentes HËÎBÇTMRTStS AtiaEetyPO'Bas

PJias -IRAHCX EIBtOK

3DBIXCX t Planning Futurs Construction ?roernas and Subolsslon of Beocmwndatioiis for HAIO Cotmon Infrastructure.

TO , -t Conanitar-in-'%isf, AlUad Air Forças Central Buropa . Coanander-In-Cblef, Allied Land Forces Central Surope

, Klagj-ÇJifleer, Central Siropo _ ; Gognender-in-Chlef, Allied Forces Bortbem JSnropo

H Çomwior-in-ChiGf, Allled Foroas S uthnrn Europa OtmmaDdvr--In-Cbieif, Hedlterrauean

Ii' Ibe purpose of this directive is to furnish planning end policy guidance to major subordinate coimands idth respect to their responsi-bilities for t

a» Determining, in conjunction "ith nations concerned, «hieb ^ l i tary eonatrutrtton recfuirenenta for the support of Allied Codnand Buropof « i l l be recosnended as 11HATO oom-on infrastructure • end which should be'programmed as nHatlonal Infrastructure".

b. Prsiparlng and submitting recommendations for fFifth Slice* HARi onuon oonstractlon projects required to be initiated in 19K and tentative estimates of total remaining NATO common 'requirements ( f ina l Paqoiremente") T-Mch would complete the "!MPO conson Infraetruotaratt DtogrM for total currently »rejected SACED!; force requirements. -

Zm In the absence of Fbrco goal dc^sicns y the NATO council in llsoeobpr 1952, there presently exists no fl_ni basis for datoloping the Fifth Slloa VATO oonoon pro^ron for construction which must be initiated In calendar pear 1954 for tbe actruaulated bnild-np of SKCEnR Farces through 195;. It i s deer, however, that Initiation of progrsai Dimming cannot enwit tha provision »I reeOlatic planning figures for 1955 force (seals »hich SHAPE has urgently requested be developed at the %rlog Haetliiig of tho Nurth Atlantic Coon oi l . If no program at all i s prepared until after tills meeting, It Tdll be iapooslbla for SHAPE to tttesnt a fully aupoorted end coordinated program to the Standing Group by old-1953, as will inevitably be required. Failure to fumlah a f l m program in tine to alio- for the lengthy NATO processing required could result in the loss of a costjilzti .ir.:v.iu! plica of Infraotructure. It Is therefore desired that subordinate ccmandera complete and autadt, as oraeoribed ID attached Arnums n aad I l : , cot later than 11 Ssy 1953. their initial reocnoendatlone for the "Fifth Slice* end tentative esti-mates of requirements for the total remaining ("Slnal lie uirenents*) KiIO «anon projects, including initial coordination H l t h host and user nations. This request is nede ^dth-the full realisation that i t Fill bo nociwaary f<rBttbordin-to Binnn'; 'x- .fj - l> , --3 c- ' furthor ooordl-' notion '.rith the nit 1...,- ,i- — -,1T • -- u TrEilt of Forco ponl .decisions omenotinn fixn th<- :-.: *-. - <-f ths iVi-r-il, or other instructions from higher authority.

3, It la EEAPE planning policy that recommendations for UW com-mon programs s h e l l be lirltod strictly to essentiel » i Litary requirements whioh fe l l unquestionably H i t h i n the concept of multiple-nation, aommon-UBe installations, and conform to the definitions and categories of 1VUTO coram Infrastructuren set forth in Araax I attached. A large Bhare of the rwalwlng nan constraotion required in suoport of SACBDK forces falls a-pwroriately under 1Uie clnsaiffoatiotf of "fintiODel Infrm-otrueture1 under the hasta KAfO principle that each nation l o responsible for providing for tho logistic and tdnlniatretive support of WiTftii force«.

H a r o . s K » . . , . ^ DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

NATO SECKET Vtiless construction projects bave e «eil established basis ov overriding Justification for classification as "NATO ' coM»n infrastructure11 ) i t is a waste of tine am effort to propose their inclusion in NATO ccanon pro-grans, since the ultimate result ia failure to obtain their comton finan-

•olnf« The consequence is prolonged delà/ vhlch-might bare been Avoldad by directing efforts initially toward ensuring that essential construction projects «blüh cannot qualify- for B-IC cannon program are Incorporated by the nstione concerned in their own Metlonal progrns.

At It is essential that proper Ihtegratlan be achieved between National and KATO common programs to ensure adequate support of HATO forces of Allied Comend Europe, Conaoqucntlyt i t is desired that infrastructure planning staffs of Allied Shibordlnate Camaods also Increasingly direct their attention towards the examination, in conjunction with the nntlon* concerned, of "fïation/il infrastructure* requirements as well aa hNUSO co<mon Infrastracturea requirements, pursuant to the planning guidera» set forth In attached Annex I . The responsibilities of Suhordlnate Connrln Involve » review of the requirements for tba installerons needed to train, house and support the H.TO forces of Allied Connand Europe! evaluation of the extent to T:hich existing and programmed InstallatlonB are adequate to Bpet requireaents I and finally, the Titlcing of reconaendatlena to nations and to SBAm as to the additional construction required. Tbeee steps should he applied in developing requirements for lnstallationa which should be programed ea national infrastructure" aa well aa those to be reoaunen-ded as kHATO common infrastructure".

5* It Is particularly desired that subordinate eomanâs accompUah* fu l l coordination with host and user nations, as Indicated In paragraph 4 of Annex II1 Irtth respect to the recommendations for the initial Tlfth SJice* pre gran, to be submitted 11 Hay 1953, and for the final program resulting fron any necessary adju&tmsnts, Ao a result of thorough and early coordination try subordinate commanda with nations, the pro grail re-eoimotoisd by SfL'Jfi to the Standing Group 3111 have the benefit of doss Integration with Hationcl tiens and programs, thereby expediting decisions of higher HATO agencies.

FOR TOE SWKSlE ALLIED COMtjBlKR EUROPE:

L BncIat 1 - Annex I Quidanca fbr Developing Re-

quirements far "National Infrastructure" andfL'iTO

Chief of Staff

Comon Infrastructure" 2 «- Annex II - Guidance for Preparation of

f irr ReconitandaHon for Vlftii Slice H.VIO Gannon Infrastructure e Progrom «

3 - Annex III - Quldance for submitting Tentative Sstlmatee o f Total ReflCtaining Reqnlra-oents for Nj1TO Coimon Infrastructure ( Tinal Requirements.» ) .

U - Annex IT Beforances DjSTfJB^IPH > See' following page

2

NATO SECRET DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O NATO SECRET

PiaTKIBTOIOH

Etuaiah Prgneh

dKCAIBCEKX CIHOUHDOMT FLAGCHH OIHQHOBTH CIHOSOOTrH OXHOMED STDa OP NASO SBC GBJ NAC SGLO PARIS HGD ABKASA J(C® AIHHlS MOD BRUSSELS HOD COÏËHHAOB* MOD LISBON MCffl LCfflDCN KOD LUZBIBOUfifi HOD OSIiO NGD OW AHA. MOD PUBIS MOfD RCHE HOD THE HAOUS SSC DEF WASH IHTEflSMVICES LIAI30Ö SBCEBfARIAI POBTAIBKBLEAD HASLAHS OSANNEL OtSHITTEE BtOOO PT.T.fl

SEOHESlARtAS COS D3A.CÏ0E DEPAIB DEKtAT EC03 P f t O DOOS L f c A SKftOOS HtOQRAHHUIQ OPFICE PPAHDO SET OAHDT DIV SIff WV BUDPIH IOH DIT CEHTKAL FISES

15 15 5

20 15 15 21 40 5

10 10 10 10 5

1 1 Î

10 5 to 10 10 10

1 2 2 5 5

' 5 2 5 1

20 50

10 15 %

15

9 15 3

10 10 10

5

5

10 10

2 1 5 10

MOTB Oopies In Preiioli w i l l he forwarded as soon as possible .

- 3 -HftIO JMTfff D

EC

LASS

IFIE

D -

PUB

LIC

LY D

ISC

LOSE

D -

PD

N(2

012)

0008

- D

ÉC

LASS

IFIÉ

- M

IS E

N L

EC

TU

RE

PU

BLI

QU

E

U 9 rtATO SËCûJÎC .

if® 6100/5/1-111/53 Annex I to

QtfIRAHCE TOR BEyEMPIHO RECIUIBaffiMfS AHP1 KBCOIMByDmG JBbatABS TOit ATIOBAL

IHPRABTWfl.CTOKE'1 AKP *WAM OMaPN KFRAamüCHTia*

1. Tlw effort« of StiAFE and Allied Scbordlnate Commda in tba field of lnfraetrantufe Iiave1 to date, been directed prinarlly toward the development of "HflfrO, P?fT"n IltfmTTMftaTf "i "i^h relatively l i t t le consideration of "Hatiflnal ItfglftT1 n t r j ^ ' «réarme. Coordination «Ith national authorities Id the field of lnfreatruoture likewise has been concerned principally Kith the Jaevr rohötruotion proposed for inclusion In NAfO ccniKHi progrns. In the futute, hoasvsr, as the balk of the Tirograaaing of »NATO oonrnon infrastructure* drams to ^ close, greater V portunity exists for Review of "National infrastructure» requirements fttr HAIO forcée, and, In conjunction with national authorities, detaral* tuition of the extent to ifalch existing facilities meet these require-ments and Whether the'programs planned by National authorities for neu construction are adequate to meet the needs of Ulied Cotnand Europa.

>'. Zt The basic principle governing tbe development of requirements for tho construction of the additional fixed installations needed in SiippMt of NATO forces assigned or esrmsrked for Allied Coanand Surope le the military need. Infrastructure requirements should bs analysed on their merits as to military essentiality, adequacy of existing facilities, and net additional construction required to meet minimal essentiel needs. After requirements have been determined, and their validity and juetlflcation fully established^ the second step should be to exsolne which of the projects ore properly classified as hDATO com-mon infrastructure" and whichtro not eligible for such progress but should be urovided bj respective nations as a part of their responsi-bility (as set forth in nC 36 and JÜC 22/12^ for providing required logistic resources and support for their national contingents assigned or to be sssigned to Allied Comcnd Snrope. After having classified requirements for neu construction as either Hationsl infrastructure* or ttHATO oonnon infrastructure11, or a combination of the tiro, ths next step Is to submit arwopriate rocooaond Htions for the programing of each category.

3. In determining whether requirements for ns« construction should be programed as "l a t i o a a l infrastructure" or as "NATO coram Mfra-ateuebore*, i t should be recognised t h a t catégorisa of fixed installerions F h i o h do not already h a v e a F e l l established basis or possess over-riding justification for classification de 1WATO conaton infrastructure' fall t> gain acceptance for svtcb programs in the final analysis, The long delays end nested effort T f t l c h result from a*tempting to include iteme under MTO common programs which will n e v e r be accepted as such, end the advantages of processing such itens under Matlonsl programs from Uw beginning, vas pointedly illustrated- during the course of development of the Fourth Slice infrastructure program. Construction projects esti-mated to cest a total of 497 million pounds iters recommended to KUPE by subordinate ctntfiendertt. SBAKB reduced this to a total of 232 million pounds in Its final reoomteodatlons to the Standing Group. To doits, only VS million pounds Use been financed, and only 65 million pounds additional even accepted as eligible for common financing, UaIiy of tbe remaining projects have no prospect of approval as NATO coamon, even though Uie bulk of them are valid military requirements." It Is not the lack of justification of their nilitcry necessity that has caused their delay, but rather their non-acceptsnoe for Inclusion in HATD coMKin programs. Some of Uiose projeeta uere originally reoonoended to S5W5 as long age as 16 months, and no doubt attny .would bave been Initiated long ago, or even completed by now, hod Uiey bean pi one ad

1 NATO SECRET 1 D

EC

LASS

IFIE

D -

PUB

LIC

LY D

ISC

LOSE

D -

PD

N(2

012)

0008

- D

ÉC

LASS

IFIÉ

- M

IS E

N L

EC

TU

RE

PU

BLI

QU

E

NATO SEUütf and IafiLafidnted under Uatipnal pro grans froa the beginning* To avoid the lo Ag delay consequent to ucru. seful attempts to process ltena nhieh do ttot qualify M HATO coano n luffs* tine tare, fh<i criteria far HATO COMMA classification «mât be «pplied strictly and .all projects not IiBquestioiiebly Within this classification most be reoorawrtod fro« the beginning for inclusion in Netloital pro grans»

4. L It la appreciated that ia the past there bas been a laclt of sufficiently exact criteria for determining Aether a project should or should hot be classified as conmon infrastructure » Thia has encouraged the submission of iters, rhiôh bava been unacceptable as NfiTO wmon end thereby delayed their provision; fron HationeX resources. Therefore, the folio Vfinp definitions end. rtiditional guidance are aet forth for the purpose of assisting subordinate cû«nands in developing, in conjunction with National authorities, requirement« for future oohatructionr and for determining the types of project* Bfcich should be classified mat appropriately for inclusion in NatidQal procraua and those relatively limited categories \jhich can qualify *8 eligible for lneluaion in NATO coemon progress«

5* wWational InfraBtructiarag nay be defined aa those fixed static Installations which are required ty respective nations for the opera* ional J logistic, or administrative support of their f o r I n S l u d i n g the national force« assigned to or earmarked for SACBUR* Tba fact that tro nations nay have a joint Interest in en installation ohich Mritally falls nithin the definition end intact of National responsi-bility does not operate in itself to change the classification of the installation from nHationeI infrastructure* to lfELTkTO eoaoon infra* structure "National Infrastrucfeirett include* ell types of fixed installation a required for national forces fctiioh have not been speci-fically established aa J1ATO co**iton categories or nbleh do not clearly conform to eligibility criteria for ftJO oomon programs. Fixed in-stallations falling in tbe classification, of nHationel Infreetructure0 include those squired for the folloninp purposes, nthen required for the use or support of Hfitiooal forces :

a* Tor exercise of cDmand f such aa permanent headquarter» vtA oeftimnicetione S ^cilities »

b* For jaaintenence of forces and material, such ast barracks; hospitals; depots, warehouses and other storage and supply installa* tlons; and maintenance ejid repair lnetalletions,

0, For Hovciont of troops end Itaterlal9 such aa railways, roads, bridges, cannls, pipelines, ports and airport? (other than HATO coram tactical airfields)*

d 4 Pernanent defense installationst auch aat harbor, coastal and frontier defenses} fortified enplacenents; field defensive works* IbcludiDg ulna fields and anti-tank obstacles] radar coverage} ho&e defense airfields; air base s in svnoort of H*JD comton tactical airfields; and national training facilities reqdired to provide trained replace-ments for the ÜÜTO força* of Alliad 1Jomand E*urope»

6» frWl T*fn^atruetufe* may be defined as those fixed installations rhich have been specifically established as HATO cotrcn categories on the basis of nultlple-oation coamon use, or which, by their nature, cannot be considered to be primarily the responsibility of nny one nation to tfrovide* Sormallyt installations concerning only tso nations should zrtt be included in HATD oofmon programs, hut should be provided Hinder National programs throu&i direct bilateral arrang&aants between the too nations concerned* It le SHJiPB planning policy that recojuoendations for NAÏO ooomon programs be IlmLted strictly to minium» essential ailitary construction of the following typas t

HATO' S&3ŒT - -DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O ö

6 M T O SBCKhT Operational airfields required for specifically approved

wd agreed SACEaiE força BPala* not inolwling requirement« for sup-porting BASE« OT installations other them jet fuel facilities which qualify KDder 6b below»

b . J e t f u e l i n s t a l l a t i o n s f o r 3 0 d ^ y s s t o r a g e , a n d f o r w a r d a r e a d i s t r i b u t i o n p i p e l i n e s TJhicb » r © i n t e g r a t e d * i t h a n d s e r v e JUSO c o u p o n a i r f i e l d s ,

¢, Davsl beae irtstallatieaa required for atriutly alllad and tsulti-netional sniHtary ud«*

d» Signals installations ( communications, r a d a r e n d naviga~ tlonal aida) o n l y to t h e e x t e n t n e c e s s a r y to c o m p l e t © the àlnlanw SKgnentatlon of existing and progrsnuoed facilities needed to fie et essentiel military requirements for Allied Coiuiand Europe, not includ-ing strictly national requirements

a« T r a i l i l D g installations for inter-allied training nftder International control not including facilities required by nations for the train! fig odiich is a national responsibiIity»

f* ^ar Headquarters required to complete the minima? essen-tial protected Installations needed for the higher echelons of Allied Cooaand Suropa4

g* Other types of installations only ahen they meet the f o l -io vi tig criteria s

(1) ire clearly not the responsibility of individual nations tojrovida, and are unmistakably for multiple-nation usej

¢2) Or there exista clear cut justification für oomwm financing due to definite and concrete advantages» econoniea, or k Uitery benefits to be derived fron inclusion of the installations In RM1C1 common eon* struction -prograie »

^ATodECKEr DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O $ J M A i O dfiuäif luriex II to

7. . , M G 6100/5/B-111/53

GMIPjtMCE FCK IBEEaRATIQB OP FIRH RECOTOIEHDATIOHS FCB! iwaa 1Iiff «ata < m u m u S M M a r c t e " m b ä k m

1 • r i f l ^ 1 " P o f "Fifth 31 ice" (19¾ trofrsm) : Tiie "Fifth Slice" will consist of only -those addition-

al lteos of required new construction which qualify under the criteria prescribed for "HAïO common infrastructure" and which, must be Initiated in calendar ysar 1954 for support of the ac-cumulated build-up of SAÖEUH*s forces through 1955.

2. Jorog Basia : a. MEO-J2 force goals for 1955 will be used as the

basis for developing "Fifth Slice" requirements, pending re-vision of these force goals.

b. Since MRC-12 force goals for 1955 are incomplete for Greece and Turkey, subordinate commands will Kiake beet pos-sible assumptions as -t) "the portion o-î tha ultimate force re-quirements stated for these nations in 3HA£>E/t215/52 (See para-graph 2, Ânnex III) which will require Initiation of construc-tion in 1954 in order to support the forces which it is esti-mated will actually tie in existence in 1955. These tentative estimates will he furnished as a part of the Fifth Slice re-couraendatians, but will be clearly identified ae over çnd above requirements for MRO-'L foroe goals, and will be supported by a statement of the ass-jt pttons on which they are based.

3. Ileteminatien of "Fifth Slice" Requirements : a. In pi-oj.tiTing "Fifth Slice" requirements, sub-

ordinate eoDia'jiids will take Xull cognizance of the screening and adjustment of previously submitted projects hiciilave taken place in SHuPE and other XATO agencies, as specifically refer-red to in the Appendices attached to this .annex.

b. Subordinate aoanaiids Kill take into account as already programmed the approved projects in the First Incre-ment of the Fourth Slice. Vhese projects, including those in the approved but unfinanced portion of tho Fourth Slice, which are listed in SKai®/t/53 Cf 7 January 1S55 an3 TAB Ii of SHAH!/ 1420/52 of 23 December 1952, "«1J.1 not Toe included again in the recommendations of subordinate commands.

c. The projects in the Second Increment of the Tourth Slice program, recommended lay SHiIE in TAB B of SHAEE/ 1266/52 of 25 November 1952, will be reconsidered by subordi-nate commands, and to the extent that the requirements are still valid, will be included in "Fifth Slice" recommendations. In reconsidering these deferred projects, it will be noted that the Appendices attached hereto list certain adjustments in the Second Increment which were necessitated by the adjustments made by the Standing Group in the First Increment of the Fourth Slice as originally listed in SHAI®/'286/52.

d. !Ehe extent to which latest developments and po-licy deolsions affect the previous tentative "estimates of "Fifth Slice" requirements set forth in SHAPE/706/52 of 2 August 1952, are stated specifically for each category m the Appendices of this Jtnnex. The revisions thus required in original Fifth Slice

- 1 -

NATO SECRET DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

Q O e. estimates will be carefully considered by subordinate commanda.

6. Projects for field defensive worts and EMail ports improvement which, were originally recommended ^or in-clusion in Fourth and Fifth Slice programs will not be inclu-ded in future programs, pursuant to ihe decision of the Mili-tary Committee that such projects are »ore properly national responsibilities. Construction of roads, r ai lioads, and air depots, previously recommended bv aa''.ordinat9 commanda, are likewise considered ineligible for ; AfO CMPII programs.

f. AttachW- Appendices A throurfj & provide specific guidance with respect to each of the str.t.V.shcd categories of BWO cooBon infrastructure. H 3 0 in< - .dci • convenience in reference are pertinent listings of prf- o>_ .'y submitted pro-jects. These projects should not nra w e : -r'i-.iy be regarded aa TTalid HATO common requirements, nc ^ 1'oKld oe carefully re-considered hy subordinate cemmands to r.i'ii„- ths essentiality of the military requirements end t fc^r ej_-<;?nJility for clas-sification as "NATO caTmon in-frastmvairv"' ' accordance with the criteria set forth in Annei J aVjve.

4. Coordinatic . with Host Mati sr.* : a. Subordinate commands i.lli level op requirements

in conjunction with host and user nation- C-J wilJ accomplish full coordination with them prîcr to recommendations to SHAIE. Such coordination shall InjLi'ä 3 .

(1) Thorough exploration Cf »hether require-ments should ac-e prGperly "be jüet "by Natio-nal programs ratl.er ^h-n KA70 craenon pro-grams. Uiiier bho i ; I J . C Iset ior~h in the basic letter ~ :r An'IOY I above.

(2) Agreement as to .site T.t ittior.s in all ap-plicable CASOL -

¢3) Agrsamen; siv i.} -^ops of required new C o n e t i 1 U C t i C n , s t i n g - r j c jmr j ca u s e of exis-ting facilities -

(4) Obtaining soun;. cos ; antidates from host r. at ions, b&^eJ en V.'.».;'. Ji.pari01108 data as to average <,f ; t-mdard projects of the pane -V ? ^ • . .o the speoific sites proposed W-e new Txrojects. Host nation cost etti-ü? should be based where possible on '.r.j-nh -n.-; opinion which has taken into accowri* a> a raad preli-ifiinary survey of the ai'.e, ahd has given ;o] is liberation to locp.l conditions affec-ting costs, inclUQiT.3 2C'j.)frJient of existing faollititt:. Fitiiaates should show the major el ientr.' Oi" wori which malte up the total cost (as example, each se-rial of approved airfields standards), and should be sufficient!;' detailed to efnable subordinate comiaidG. SHASB and NATO mili-tary agencies +•-•> vi,';*! colts against mili-tary henefita. ELÜ! to enable other IfATO agencies to évaluée the validity of the estimates. Any contingency factor Included

- 2 -

NATO S E C W DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

--is

3. WATO ^ C S E T • in cost estimates .will be stated spe-cifically' All cost estimates will be given * ia pctmäB sterling'.

.- b. Whenever requirements are revised or adjusted as a result of chahges in force goals or new instructions of higher authority, subordinate commands will effect.the neces-. sary 'further coordination Kith nations.

5. Justification : a. Kio importance of adequate supporting justifica-

tion is tBjgha&ized, since the program recommended by SEIAPS must utilize the justification submitted by subordinate commaiiäs to substantiate the military necessity for the requested projects and their eligibility for inclusion in ITATO coranon programs. Furthermore, SHAIE will call upon subordinate commands to assist ia the'justification-of programs before other HATO agencies. The Supporting data submitted must be seIf-sufficient end will in- . elude detailed statements substantiating the following :

. • (1) 1Ehat the project is a military necessity, . . • • i s so looated .as to. satisfy operational , . ,

. ; -. - requirements, .'and provides military benefits which justify the proposed expenditure.

{2) That the project is eligible for ITATO com-mon programming in accordance with the po-licy set forth in- -paragraph 2 of the cover letter and in Annex I above.

(5) That existing facilities have been taten fully into account in meeting requirements, and that cost estimates have taken full ac-count of all existing installations.

(4) That formal coordination, including site location, bas been effected with host aïid user nations. Where substantive agreement h^s not been rsaohed, explanatory details as to specific points of differences will be furnished.

b. A gcnoral justification for each category as a whole as well as speoifio justification fçr the projects recom-mended in each country will be included under the format pres-cribed in the following paragraph.

6. Foriaat for Submission : a. Recommendations will be submitted in the format

prescribed in the attached Appendices, showing the projects for each host country. ïhe designated "TAB letter" identification will be preserved for each category, although all categories may not be recommended by each conmand.

b. Recommendations will be submitted by subordinate commands to SIAfE in 30 copies.

7. Priorities ; Fifth Slice Program recommendations will be accompa-

nied by a tabulation with brief explanations giving priorities of projects within each category. No overall program priority • listing as a whole need he furnished at this time.

M j o à m DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

0 O 1 0 - iMAXU 3£(JKi£I

8. Stenajj Itena i Separate technical instructions will be furnished su-

bordinate Goiomands for the determination of requirements for signals communications, radar naming Installations, and radio navigational aid installations to be included In the "Fifth Slice" program. Recommendations of subordinate commands for these items will he submitted to.SHAPE separately. Upon com-pletion of the development of requirements for signals Itensf the projects approved by SHAPE «rill be integrated Into the overall program and coordination will be accomplished with subordinate commands with respect to relative priorities and other aspects of the relation of these items with other caté-gories of the "Fifth Slice" program.

9. Meetings : These meetings will be held at SHAPE for the purpose

of resolving problems which may have arisen in implementing this directive and to review orogrvsa made to date in developing program recommendations. Additional meetings will be held with JCotisands as uay be required with rosnoct to the adjustment of programs based on force goal revisions or other decisions emana-ting froo the .»pril ooeting of the Herth Atlantic Council.

COriiIflHD ATTEMDDffi DATE

2 April

7 April

ALFCE AAFCS FOCE CIHC&OUTH CINClED

AFME 9 April 10. pnclflsuyes : Planning Quldqpce for NATO Conynoq

Infrastructure Categories : Appendix A - Tactical Air Forces airfields Append Ix B - Haval Airfields Appendix C - Jet Fuel Installations Appendix D - Naval Bases Append Ix E - Training Installations for Air Forses AppendIx F - Training Installations for Land Forces Appendix O - War Headquarters

. 4 -

JlATO SECRET

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

NATO SECRET ^ a T^An»efc II

LOC 6100/5/^-111/53 FLA'f TH? GgXPAT PCR

HATQ IflraASERtTgnj g

CAfaxggf- T* enCjt4 rJ ITCTÛ C S MEFnrjBS .,

1« Dcflpitjoti of Category - Tecticel operational airfield» required fop »peeificallyâpprt^ved arid a g r d S'CTrR force foale not including re qui resent* for Mrpcxrtiug tases or instelletiona.

2» Barta f o r eomaiting Requlreaents

-- - ^ r The following- criteria will be used in developing NATO *OOV» j&on require« int» - for airfield» for tactical airforcess " "*

(1} Except Tihere tactical depl<r*ent requinrenente' require an * 1 cScpeptii i to be made, «t least the nons*l operational unit

c^' eaCh1 nation's airforce will be deployed mi a aingle - - field, ïUis assumption means that Ir general- bafrffsan §0 - -

and 75 aircraft will pomally bc located on each airfield« ¢2) Consideration will fce given to national deployment plana,

and irtiere t&ese plan» can bc utilised, they will be in-corporated in SACEUR' * defence plana.

(3) All weather fighter aircraft will be deployed as Indivi-. „ _ ... jjfcJ&l- squadron» operating on airfield*-assigned prinarüy-

tn other type units. Because the similarity « f mtMijos, All-Leather Fightera will normally be deployed on later-oeptor Dey ipIghter fields,

(¾.) All Btftin airfields (fields planned for permanent uccupafion in peacetimeï wMofc ere developed to «irtimmi atan-dards r*ut of ^ntemfrtionel infrastructure fund» mat bc suitable TTertifii Iocr tion^ .ten for national reasons this i» not Do^siblc -nd s nation decide a th*t in peacetime its forces shound be at a base not suitable for its wartlike utilisation, t-?ia base nit be ten s trusted at national ex-pend rHlFB être-. is tue -Itcm^te deployment -mly provilFd th-t, in th- r-i^t of ïo rfiïitiés, the unit can be ro splayed r^idlv ciourh to T>sra>it the fulfillment of SACEUP1 ï mission.

(5) Redeployment airfields (fluid,* not occupied in their enti-rety in peecetlnc, but • -hi eh bo available for upçupa-tion immediately npon the outbreak of hostilities) mat be provided for ttoae units which are deployed in peacetime at lr^çàtiona not considered acceptable in tinte of war.

(6) In appropriate number of alternate airfields to permit tactical flexibility in the deployment of SfcCEIJR1 a air-forces after tbe outbreak of hostilities will bc irtcer» prrated in programs,

(7) Ixisting facilities will be utilised to the mmrltwai extent that they are suitable for or adaptable to required deploy-ment et taotioal airforce a,

( 8) Facilities re^uireuente for new projects will bs based un ths approved airfields standards as stated in document SfîAH/LOG 616V3V-2&/52 dated 2V March 1952, and the eu»* auniostloha electronics construction standards contained in

- SSAPB message 3Ï-2748Ç (SH11JTO 597) dated 7 Fehruary 1953.

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

iE- w A i o ^ B c m . . . . . . , . 3. PrevlmalT Beeom^ndad Progra i'

¢1. 2nd Iiicro-iont. Fourth S ica recoaasndgtlona t FDT background information SA to tfBrviooa planning, THE

Xollonlng taWletions show details of the 1Secoad iBCresent" portion of that progrn after adjustaents oro node by the Standitig Group during its review Iti Decenber 1952. No costs are ghoro nine« these figures require oonplete revislona by host nations,

(1) FRflTOE

Serial location ; Type 1

Planned j RemairJcs Uaer Dation >

îbT 1 (o }df (el

1 2 3 U

5 6

i SOUl ! Main JUV3MC0BHI '< Haio OKAÏ WM ' Ksln EAGDMiftI Xftin MDDRMBUm ' Alt. JWMILLT ARBi Bain

FR I rrogrîtTïod in Appendix B 1 to Aroiax A of AAFCE/4Û3/52

FR 'and TAB B, Second Inoroienl j of SHAÏB 1266/52.

FR I

FB j

FR j ¢2) NmERLtlHDS

1 I ' ! 1VHHtO < Itedap ; QEEl , prograndtted in Appandix B J : to Anns* A, ii CE Jft3/53,

1 : ' and TAB B, Seoood Increnait ! ; 'of SlUPE 1286/52.

BOMt The field DSKCUIUf, previously programmed in Second Increnant of SHJUFS 1 2 8 6 / 5 2 , vas moved to the approved and financed First Incranant (SHAPE L42O/52).

(1> UENHARK

1 i f NORTH JUTLAND Sedep DE Ppogrsnaied in TAB B1

AREA I j Sseond Laersiient j j SHAPE/I286/52.

(A) JBfW^

1 LISTA ' Hadep

I i I t

UK PrograJiosd in Appendix A of .'.FSB éioo/îs/ioi and TAB B1 First Incranont of SHAPE 1286/52 but defer«« to Second Incranent aa a remit of aotion by Stoft-dlng GiHnip là Decanber 1952

HATO SECRET ^ DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

üQLTO SECKET 0

Serial Iocatlm fnl W 1 KIÏOETO

2 RHONI

AVIANO II 4 CAFttA

5 CSlIGNOLft 6 GIOIA DEL

COLLB 7 HAHDURtA

8 PRATIGA PI HARE

? - • AraHDOU

Typb

:(=1: - E s s t

Haln îfelB i «in Italn >*ain

Hain - - t Kaln Hoic

TléûbwT?^

Uain j- IT

, < Baiarka

Progro.iuQQd in Taii I-A of HAFSE/906/52 qnâ TAB B', Second Increnent of SHAPE 12S6/52

I1TOgraimed itrTAB I-A f of HiPSE/4f7/52 and I TAB B, Second Increneat ' of SHAPB 1286/52.

(6) SREBCE

TOIKALA Main Gll Programmed In TAB I-A < of HAFSE/90 /52 and TAB , B, Second Increment of

SHAPE 1286/52. 1 -

(7) QERHMTC - C.K. SDWB fAAFCK)

RHBIH TEST HIHSIiBB

HANDQRF M0K7ENICH IDTSfSUKRF DELHOVEÄ

Main Main Main Radap Main

GEB ) GEB ) UK ) GER )

DK

i Frogramned in Appendix ! B to Annex A of AAFCS I 403/½ and in TAB B1 ' Second Increment of " , SHAPE 1286/52.

' Prcgranrod in TAB Bt 1 First liicranent of j SHAPE 128¾¾ hut de-ferred to Second Inc-

' reasnt aa a result of action by Standing

! Group in Deqenbar 1952

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

X U .

O . V L .

>;ÏATO S E C » -(S)1 GEffiIflWY - U.S. aoro .teâFCE)

O

j Serial Location L_ ' 1Vpe œ riicrSErsHz::

j CHEBELSMET"

I RHEIN HflItr I ! WIESBADEN

Plsntied' Uaair h'M.inn

Uomuka

E Kaln I < I I UaiD j US

Prograracd in .Appendix B to AntBic A of ààFCa 403/«

ad TiB B1 second inurement ol SHAFB 1286/52.

(9) GBaMiWI - KtITISH BOME tCDICWORTHl

1 sosiEsnmra) Main ojc Z siur a i t .

Theae fields were progran-ted in Amsibiix JL of Wtlg ¢200/53/401 and TAB B,

second increnieirt. SHAPE 1286/52.

b. Tentatjve Fma Slica Ksc^mnqi atlgnq - In SRAPE 706/52 the Collswing additional airfields »ere listed to meet planned build-up through 1955«

j 1 j FEtANCB ; Koin"J I « ] j

j 2 j BELCimi t Redeuj i !

BOTEt Thie tentative progrès ivas developer before the finalisation of tho Fourtli SIiee Trogram SHAPE 1286/52.

4. Cost Eatiaatee Coat estimates submitted on the Bomat tolow will to« developed

In accordance vlth jUie instructions given in Paragraph T (2), (3), {£) of Annex I l end auch instructions as ney be issued to Host Matlono by the Korth Atlantlo Council. Thay Hill he supported by attached detailed schedules showing line iton qiiaEtitl=u t i vait oosts as furnished by host nations.

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

15. M T O SECJshT 5. Eoraat - Recomsnaeä Fifth Slice programs for airfields for

tactical sirforces ï*lli be sultnitted in the fdloniikg fornAti

TiB A

(Cowuusdl (File Hof' RBCOIMKHDSP FIFTH SLICE KAIO COWDM

( Conaard )

'53

IBFitASimcnmE PROQUB

TACTICAL AIRFORCfiS AIRnmDa

1. PBnnBtM AiHUtBT

Serial

(a) 1 2

ate.

Govintriea Sumbar of Airfields

W

J T O T A L

! i

4 - -

Eatljcgated Cost (Pounds)

(d)

2. PROJECTS BI OQUfTCRIBSt

"(Country)

Serial

U b C LocatiDD

Z w ALPHA

BBTA

OffltLple- P Eatlaated j Typa 1 PlEtnned ! . User Hattos I tion Data [ Ooat (Pounds)

TOTAL

j w r r ^ T . ; Redepl IX FB-4S (MAIN IKKTH FB-7Ï

1 Ilaiti Ï 1 Radeploymeiit

1954

1954

(f)

3 . 6 2

0 . 9 9

Reoarfes

Z3sr

4-.61

Hew field

Develop-ment of existing 3rd SBae field fron Itatap to Uftltt

PROGRAM AM) FTOJECT JUSTIFICATION - (This xd.Il be et general atateneat covering tha basis for developing tbe mnber of airfields required for the oountry concerned. There Trill be attached a Project Justification for each airfield containing the data called for in Paragraph 5 of time« II as «e i l as detailed eetlnatea giving the Iteo quantities and u&lt costs*) (See para 4 abfrve)«

b. (Ommtry)

(Continue with «ueeessive tabulations for eaoh additional Country)

i < A T O S E C R E T

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

Ö 16. KATO SÊCRhT

to Turme* I. LOG 61Q0/5/E-1M/53

PIAWHiaG CTITD AMCE FflR WftIO COJffliaW J FRAËTRU^UKE

CATEGORY - »AVAL AIRFIELDS

_ I. Dcflaltloti of Gategarv Naval operational airfields required for specifically ap-

proved and agreed SACEUR foroe goals not inoludlng requirements for supporting bases or installations.

2. Basis for Commitjnp Pptiui1 ramant s .a. The Naval airfield Standards as recommended in HMffBE

190 dated 1!? December 1952 will be used as a basis for preparing. KATO Common Programs with the following revisions.;

- Item I1 h, 1, - Cloared and rough graded area - width -, 500 f t

- Item 2 - Taxlways - Flexible pavement optional ' ' - Item 2 - Tsxlways - Remarks changoS to read: "So that the runway can be cleared with dispatch there shall be exit taxitracks located at the ends and third points in the runway loagth on at least ono side.

Tho four exits from tho runway on one side shall be connected into a circulating taxi system between runway ends anfl if feasible should bo constructed as a parallel fcaxiway and shall have connections to maintenance aprons, dispersals und technical areas depending on their loca-tion. Any taxitrack connecting to the other side of the runway shall he an extension to either the end or third point or both. Each dispersal area can have a maximum of two taxiway outlets to the runway. A single taxiway to each group of dispersals will be acceptable depending tm the typo of dispersal grouping planned, however, there must always be a ainiraum of four outlets, those at the ends and third points on one side of the runway".

- Item 9 - Aircraft Fuel underground storage total'quanti-ties to remain the same but will be dispersed In not less than three locations for a primary field and two on a secondary field.

Add - Headquarters building approximately 4,000 eq feet, b. In developing reoommendations for naval airfields con-sideration will be given to Joint provision of facilities for both naval

air and air for ces bombing and gunnery training bases as a single facility. ; Tfhere suoh recommendations can be made, only the cost of facilities for tho naval airfields portion of the installation, will bo shown under this category, with appropriate cross referonce to the Traliiing Installa- ; tions for Air Forces oategiry. 1

- Item 1, a, 2, - Tire pressure 1$0 pounds per square^ inch

JlftIO SECKEf1 J DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

ö imäDÜ ofcGW,"

O 17.

3. Prerlo1Ig f i f t h ^ii fi'mflpifo« • •••' ' - •• 1 For information, only the following tabulation lists the naval airfield projects which ware previousIy included In tentative Fifth Slice estimates.

Heference ]*" Country . SHAFE ; FRAiICE 706/52 1 ITtEHCH KCftm. AFRICA

i H1LÏ , j t

I location t I

GT RAPHAEL i -ORAtT(THIERSVIttE) ! GB OTTAOLIE > CROTOBB _ ]

4. Cost a s tics te s s.*bn?. S ',sd on1 th'? formst below will be deve-loped in accordance vP t ' given in paragraphs 4a, (2) (3) (4) of Annex II, am: suet, Instruotinus as may be issued to Host Rations by the Horth Atlantic (Jounc'l. They will be supported by attaohed detailed schedules showing line item quantities and unit cost as furnished by the Host Mations.

5. CIHCMEB and C IffCSOUTH »fill collaborate in developing their inf*astructure programs to ensure that there are no duplicating or conflicting recomraeadationa. However, 3Iuoe CIBCïED's Allied Staff may not be activated in Sine to accomplish tfce preparation of the programs by the required date, and for the purpose of this directive only, and without prejudice to future assignment of responsibility, CINCSODTn is requested to submit the entire naval airfields program. CI9C1ŒD Diust however, be prepared to undertake the defense of his own requirements, i f required nefore the Council. In any instance in WhlctL the full agreement 3annot be reached, tha matter will be referred to SHAPE for resolution,

6. Format FlTtfc Slice r e c o m i D a n â e d programs for naval airfields will

be submitted in the following format-Tab B

Cockrand . / 5 3

SLIQE Command ' "

NATO ÇOa^OH INFRASTRUCTURE IOTAL AIRFIELD^

i . FftOGRAif smmm

Serial Countries Number of 1 Estimated Airfields: i Coat Pounds

' X i l

i 2

Etc

L - - £b r~; j—r:Ts>:_ -„mr

T O T A t B * SiV 1^ jtfÄTO SECRET D

EC

LASS

IFIE

D -

PUB

LIC

LY D

ISC

LOSE

D -

PD

N(2

012)

0008

- D

ÉC

LASS

IFIÉ

- M

IS E

N L

EC

TU

RE

PU

BLI

QU

E

O ö 1 6 ' X M A i O Ü f â j f c b ï

2. PROGRAM JtTST IFICATION (Include a general statement on the overall justification

for tbe nuober and location of the naval airfields required, and also a statement regarding joint use for both naval air and air training when' contemplated«)

3. PROJECTS BY COUHTRIEg

(CountryJ

Serial { LocatiiHi

1 S

Stc T O T A L

b.

j Planned User I Nations

T . . JSi-.: v.:.

Estimated Cost Pounds

. t- ... . . .

(CountryJ

HOTEi A project Justification for oach rkival airfield will be attached containing the data called for in paragraph 5 of Annex II, as well as a detailed estimate giving line item quantities and unit costs. Also an indication of Joint use when contemplated.

(Country) (Continue with successive paragraphs for each additional country. French North Africa should be listed separately.)

B - 3

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O o • "-'t, LD-JTM*

MÏOSBCm^ : • • *• ••- * to Année; II

WG 6IOO/5/E-HI/53 • ^ , PLflMH IHGl faftIPAHCÉ fOB pj fcnIj^P P j ^ C T U f l E •

i - CiSSCXELY - Jgr ^r- T ^ f ^ f i r H

1* DefinltlOB Qf Category Jat fuel installations for 30 days storage, and; forward area dis-

tribution pipelines which AR« integrated «Ith and serve IUTO OODÜÜG airfield«.

24 ln^agtaKfaaa a* POL installation* other than those provided for in NATO comon

airfield standards, eod those nhich qoalify as KATO common under paragraph 1 above, are considered fundamentally- to be a Kationnl responsibility« Any e&eeptlons must reet the criteria eat forth in paragraph 7g of Annex I above?

are clearly not the responsibility of individual nations to provid« end are tixaiatekably for aultiple-tiatioa use j or there exists clea#~ctit Juatififtation for common financing? due to definite advantages, economies, or military benefits to be derived fron inclusion la KATO oounoa construction

b# ^he aere fact that twa nations rii^t discharge their national responsibilities for logistic support were efficiently by joint construction of a POL pipeline , or any other facility, is not sufficient Justificntion in itself for classification as HATO couraon.

Ck It is of the utmost importance that adequate pipelines . mrt t¢- forward areas, to the extent required to supplement road, rail and oApal facilities, be provided at the earliest p-seible date* An overall study o f the total net SACSOR requireiits for FOL installations is now being «ade under SHAPE a»ni tor ship, taking into account gross SAG3ÜR require-sente for all types of ro^ f<?r land, air acid naval forces, and existing end planned facilities for the storage and movement of SAOHfR FOL* This study has the objective of do vole ping a fully ccrdiaated plan for POL storage and distribution of POL for Allied Ocmnand Eurepo, and to enstzre that the various Kational programs and the NATO common program are properly Inte-grated» If in the course of this Study9 i t develcps that any segment of the remaining requirements for additional construction of POL installation«

. olearly qualifies for NATO common pr graioBiing, such requirements will be given due consideration as possible exceptions to tho basic policy that such logistic soppcrt is normally provided by each notion.

d. If at any time subordinate contend* neach a stage in their •studies of FOL requirements «hare i t ia clearly evident that specific installations are ribt properly classified as Kationol infrastructure t and clearly meet the exacting criteria for consideration for NATO comon pre* grscooting appropriate recocmendatioas should be submitted to SHAPE» Kov-evdr» no POL construction other than 3et fuel Installations as defined in 1 abovet should unilaterally or independently be included in Fifth Slice recowDendations withrut f irst having been coordinated vith SUjhFB in con-nection with tha overall study no? In process, and having been accepted for consideration as an exception to the normal classification as Kationd

infrastructure + Any such recommendations will be submitted under a new category 11IOL Installations"-, rather than under the vJet Fuel Installations* category* The format for submission « i l l be the a&mo as prescribed for jet fuel installations in para. following»

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

so , J J^TQ SEQkKf ° ! '' ' " *

3 . PRFLT cualT SUhnltted I M M I B

Tba follotiing tabulation shoos tba jet fuel installations portion of the Sewod Incluant of SHAPE 1286/52, sa adjusted te conform to Standing Groop decisions 111 Decattber 1952 regarding- changes in the First Inoranentt (Jill figures in Mlllon peunda sterling) Connand CoimtrT

CIWCMOKTH BORBAl (I) CIHCIOiTH DENMilKK (a)

CIHCLÜHDCEHT PETHEHLflHDS (3) (CIMCAIRaaW) CIHCLiUœŒtH BELGIUM (CIIfCAIRCEtIT)

CIHGLiNDCBlT

0.11

0,07

Flpallqea Total 0.11 0,07

No Second Inorenant

Ho Second Increoent

(CIHCAIRCetn) ERAHCE W) 0.46 0 .as 0.76

CIHCSOUTH ITALT (5) 0.77 2,14 2.W CIHCSCtTCH GREECE (6) 0.02 0*46 O^S CIHCSOUTIt TOHKET No Second Inoronnnt

1.45 2.38 4-33

HOIESt (l) 7500 otibic neters et LISTA (transferred by Standing Group

I'ron Iat to 2nd Tncrcnotit)

(a) 5000 cnbic eeters at MLBORC fbr unlooatsd redeployment airfield.

(3) faere l'a now no Second Incroeent fcT the Netherlands as the original 0*14 (representing 26 kilometres of /,• pipeline fron VJOffiNHIRC to IPEHBDRO) Bas mcvad Into First Ineranent vfcen the Standing Group transferred THEHBORG from the Second to tba Wrat Inurement.

(4) - SiaiassLi 10,000 cubic metres at CHALCHS and IO1OC1O cubic metres .

at CHJXWNT in supoort of airfields at JUVIMCOOHT, HAGUEHAU, KOKITiY, MPKRtELOH, DOLE AHD ORftI 0.21.

15,^0 cubic metres at CHJSLOMS and 10,r00 cubic metres * at C'.MPRj'iI in support of assumed shortfall in aircraft for German Air Units 0,27 "ipelins :

51 Kilometres of line from VE301TL to GRAÏ. (5) storage :

5000 cubic wätrea at RIHIHI 0.07 5OOO oubic Jietres at CJ-nUA — O.O7 500(1 ciibic autres at AKZIO in support of the airfield at

mmcA DI ItARE {the remaining 5ÛP0 cubic metres at AHZIO nas Krved to LATIKA) 0.07,

5000 cubic metres at 7REVIS0 in support of airfields at KIVOLT.'. and AVIATO II 0.07.

M i o W^r DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

. j r o c r cubic meters at TJRiHtf end 15, , 'C cubic Kstera a t JlIGHiyK. In s t i e r t o f the cdrf ie lds ' £ t jMEHDCJ , KiMDOr.l.'., C E a i a f t i and GITli DEL à L t E (the'5'SS~ tublc notera a t OIClA ü£L CTllS .1/; moved to Siiif SSVEEtC.)

^ .49 i

rlnollnea l

50 kilometers o f p ipe l ine f ron KIVrIiTo to AVItiHC1 I

—22- fc i ioneters -o f -4" - l in ( j f ron TLtSVISr t o VEKEKIA-BESH® 0 , 1 2 (due to deferaent of construction nt TENEZIA tESTKB)

38 WiloEete1M -of-4" line from TAR.MWO to MHBURIâ 0.21 218 kilometers o f 6" l i n e from T.'iAHTO to JEBDCUl 1 .53 .

(6) Stornpe t

125^ cubic meters at LAKISSA f o r tba a i r f i e l d at TÜTE/ILA.

Pipeline i

71 kolnaatara o l 4* l i n e from LARISSA to 1¾IKALA. to. Ia TBOMieitiBrinp the tentat ive aotioatea o f requirements s e t

f o r t h in SRATB Té/52 f o r SttiiPE F i f t h Jj 11 css , the fo l lowing w i l l govern 1

(1) Jet Jnal fornnrd storage f a c i l i t i e s f o r 30 days orerat lonal stocks and forward distrtbut lon p ipe l ines f o r HATO coiimon air f ie lds ! above that a-proved f o r Pcitirth S l i c e (SHATE 1420/52 plus 3Hùi"E I/53), must bo d i r e c t l y re lated to recommended a i r f i e l d s thr.ur-:h the F i f t h S l i c e ,

(2) Storage f a c i l i t y requirements f o r the remaining ÖT days reserve stocks " f j e t f\iel n i l l not be proposed aa HATO

4 . COST ESTHifflftS

The "Report by the Itoriting Croup o f Jet Fuel Experts*, NATC AO/i-D/118 ( rev i sed ) , dated 4 Kecanbar 1952, • par t i cu l s r ly A^end ix VII {Unit Trices of Storapa end P ipe l ines ) , m i l be useful i n evaluating the v a l i d i t y o f coat estimates famished by Host nat ions .

5 . GINCLAKDCERT « i l l be rasrwtiaible f o r submitting the coordinated re co t » widetiono of CINCLAHDCIHT and CIHCAIKCBHT.

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O

6. FTJIAT isAi'o sfîutusi:. /i •• •

-O

KacoBcrended Fifth Slics prograoa for Jet Pual installations will be salàlitad In the following format:

. . - TiB C

LECKHEHDED FIFHi SLICft ( GoniMUid J

MAy QfaiPM IKFnJSmTCMILE "R-lC-MI JET FBBL IS3IJ.L.'JI M3

1. TOflAH SBHiitijr

! Serita Country- t Total TaoiIitias

W a» Storajya b. ripelities c. Total

a*. Storape b* finalities c » Total

BstiAated Cost Ji 'J+ (pounds)

: ï > i ~ t .

Bto.

- )

• t - - -T r." TAL

2, racc-iua JBSTIFICfflfSPH ( m i te a general statement on the scope and basis for tha recounendetions}

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

2 3 0 imo.sEcm °

3 . HtDJBCTS BT CMJHTFTF-I

a, (Couatry)

(1) storage

Serial Location Capacity (Ccbic meters)

Estimated Cost (pounds)

(«> (¾) tc) (d) 1 2

Ktc T O T Jl L

_ __ _ __ (2) Pipelines

! i

(3) ItyvnBCT JQgrirlCMCjB ( See paragraph 5, annex 11« Justlfiaation Qill tnolnde 30sumptions p Tequiraaents computations, and a tabulation of unit costs«) *

(Country) (Continue with successive oareçrapfas for each additional country).

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

SU. : , ^ T O SBCKtr ; Appehdlx D

""J1-"' - •-• — ... 'to Anhex II .s • r ,. , . A " MS -6400/548--1¾^

_ ''"Cpj ifeBfe. -GfrlDAffCE Ffe 1 .

MATa COMMOII- IWnhASTRtrCTtiRE ' -' ' ^ " \ ^ *

CATSQORY - ,WAYAL BASES . *

" I V Itef Initier or' Category. .- • . _ _ * Raval Base Installations required for atriotly allied and

multi-national nilitary use. fca ... ^ „

2. Baals f o r SofipfltiiSPRspuli-emafli;^-^ ^ , ^ ïhfi facilities recommended ovist b» the minimum required to

carry out VASO fleet Glissions and to assure tho necessary sea sqppçrt of HATO Commands. It is particularly important that the facilities recommended most have been, determined to he over and above those re-quired," solely for the National forces of the countries concerned.

37 Ppevioasly ftralttyi proeitaiag Por Information only, tho tabulation shown below lists csr^

tain pertinent, previously submitted naval fleet hase projects. The faii-ft»lng pntot.s Jiould be noted in connection with this tabulation«

a. The projects submitted to SHiURE Bs-SIiowrfiUfcdeF column (d) were deferred by SHZfB since! "In view of the lack of IfATO opera-tional plana for naval forces in the Eastern Ilsditerraneanf It-Ia--Jiat now possible to justify the naval bases and I1OL facilities as to oootaon use."

- b. A comparison of columns (b) and (f), shews that, based upon CINCSODTH's recommendation, oerts&L"pri>-jaatg aoij jjprtione Pf projects were deferred in favour of higher priority work at other bases.

c. Iti reviewing projects listed in column (c), cognisance should be taken of the adjustments made In columns (e) and (f).

d. For heir pSrejeöta-shower in-.tlje tabulation. the costs must be carefully reviewed and revised by the host ns ferons. '

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

e. 'tabulation: , (F,lguçe(s In Billion pounds sterling)

f - ' I3-HAPir-j sï&pg-i . Country : 5 9 1 / 5 2 - ? o é / 5 2 ' ; 25 June g fine

MFBE - 906/52---1 10 SeDt

aFNE -IO38/61OO 29 Oot

SHAPE 12S6/52 25 Mov

I m n r r ! V c i • M ) - - " ff) !HOBIHAPRIRa 1 • --!-1Oran 5.31 ' JJ izerte f +.51 • IAlgers 2.29 i 0.30 Bone 1 . 1 4 ,

5.3I 4 .51

FRAMCE . Toulon ' 'i 1,50 1 1

0.20 0.40' 0.0+ I.30

' I -•La Spezla • 0.31 ! ftugusta < 0.15 ' 0.25 -iEçieria 0.12 : Cagliarl 0.74 | Palerao - 0.14 Maples 1 0.08 j 0.25 Saranto 0.02 1 ;ï,ivemo 0.06 ' iAncona 0.04 1 0.05 ûaata „ 0.26 !

1 1

• -

0.20 0.40' 0.0+ I.30

- r— 1 CREKCE 1

£caramange ! Soaramanga (.IÇyra), leros 7

Souda Bay

0.114 O.O25 0.043 0.070

— ; • •i

URKEY ^ Slregli llfenaris I Iamir .

O.II5 0.097

' 0.205 -

DEHMftRK ! Predarikshavn 0.47 . 0,80 Korsoe 0,12 : 0.60

0.51 0,22

0.51 0.22

(

D - 2.

WATO i j r f r . DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

26. NATO SBCRBf[ ° 4-. Cost estimates submitted in tha format below* will be deve-

loped In accordance with the instruction given In paragraphs 4a, (2) ¢3)(4-) of Annex IX. They will be supported by attached detailed 'schedules showing line Itej) quantities and unit cost as furnished! by the host nations.

5. CÏHCMED and CIHCSOiItH will collaborate in developing their Infrastructure program to ensure that there are no ûUDlloatliîg or tjanflieting"ïecâcmerflatians. However, since CUfCIED"s Ailied Staff may not be activated In time to accomplish the preparation or the programs by the required date, and for the purpose of this directive only, and without prejudice to future assignment of responsibility, CIHCÊ0DTH is requested to subdit the entire Naval Base program. CINCHED must however, be prepared to under take the defense of his own requirements, if required before the Council. In any instance in which full agreement cannot be reached, the matter will be referred to SHAIS for resolution.

6 . EffplHfr

Fifth Slice recommended programs for Naval Bases will be submitted in the following format:

TAB D

KECOMEKDBD FIFftft SJ1ICE HAftO ÇpMUOH INFftASftKUÇftORE HtOGRAM

WAVAL BASES

1. StTMimRY

Serial Country Estimated Cost (Pounds)

(a) ( b ) ( c T p

1 3

Etc

j TOTAL ! „ _, L . -

t I

2. PBOGBAM JUSTIFICATION (Include a general stateoent on the overall Justification of the number and locatims of the recommended naval bases.)

D - 3

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

W omm.mm ? k o . 3« • PROJECTS BY.COTJHTRIES :

( CotmtpyJ

Serial " , ' • > : Planned TTser

Location j Hatiwi EatioatEXl Cost

(Pounds) • <a> • 1 . fbl i - M - • = • fal

1 2

Etc

j V

i • i

• .

•

I T O T i L j ! BQgE; A project Justification for each naval base will be attaches containing the data called for in paragraph 5 of Annex II, as well as a detailed estimate giving line Iten quantities and unifc";cost.-

- -(-country-J •• -(Continue with suece-ssivè paragraphs fbr each additional country) French North Africa should bo listed separately.)

h - 4

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O \ ... O • ' ., 2^ M S O SECRET

• - LOO 6100/5/B-111/53

ruasiHg goMAHCE raft . RMlO CCMHOM IIIFRASIBOgttlBE

CATEOCKY - TBAJ-H^ FaCTT.TTIES FCB AIB FCRCE3 K PEFtEITIOK OP OAtEgQRY -

Training installations f o r interallied training under international control , not Including f a c i l i t i e s required by nations f o r the training which i s a national responsibility.

2. HffiVIOUgLY SUBMITTED IROSKAMS -The following require reconsideration in determining

Fifth Slice recommandations :

a. Second Increment of Fourth Slica (TAB B of SHAEE/12Ô6/52) : THO bombing and gunnery bases at £ 3.98 mi l -l ion each, location undetermined.

b. Tentative estimates of previous Fifth Slice recommendation ( SHAPE/706/52) :

(1) BORWAI - One range at £ 0.02 mill ion (2) BEHMABK - One range at 4.0.02 million (3) Location undetermined - Two bombing and

gunnery bases at £ 5 million each. I t should be noted that the f a c i l i t i e s contemplated in (1) and (2) above were rangea only and that the coet estimate f o r (3) above was proposed j r i o r to the repricing of such f a c i l i t i e s as shown in SHAPE/)236/52.

J. BASIS FOR OOKHITIMg REQUIREMENTS -Fifth Slice recommended programs should be based upon

the f a c i l i t i e s needed f o r 1955 Air Force goals leas existing f a c i l i t i e s (See para 3 .8 . (1 ) below) and less the f a c i l i t i e s in SHAPE/I/53 taking into account that :

a. For AAFCE and AAF&B : (1) Existing f a c i l i t i e s in Central and Southern

Europe wi l l permit training f o r 800 a i r -craft crewa per year.

(2) Air training bases are designed to have a training capacity for 625 f ighter type air- -craft crews per year.

(3) Crews of reconnaissance aircraft require only half the number of hcrçjrs of bombing and gunnery training required by crews of other types of f ighter a i r cra f t .

b. For AFNS : (J) The great distance between Northern and

Southern Europe makes i t yndesireable

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

, . , », operationally to ' noire a i r units from Horway and Penmark t o Southoro Europe, regularly , f o r a ir training.

(2) - ; -JTBrway and Denmàrk have extensiv« coast -l ines which may provide sat i s fac tory s i t e s for a i r bombing and gunnery ranges, There-f o r e , Iy usiiag exist ing a i r bases i t i s

" considered thai it'ftouiarbè" necessary to provide only a i ? t o a ir sad a ir t o ground renges anfl no-fc ooopIete a ir training* bases.

4; COST B3TDUffE3 -Recommended a ir training base standards, to Ire used

in developing preliminary cost estimates, w i l l be forwarded t o major subordinate commands by HSAPE prior to 3-5 March 1953-. Eeading reaeipt o f these standards, commands should

: uàe the fo l lowing general guidance as à basis f o r s i t e locat ions and discussions with nations' :

a . Air Bombing and Sunnery Hahgas- : (1) Length of Twntc.7 - 8000 feet. -' (2) Approximate area of a i r f i e l d - Area r e -

quired f o r main t a c t i c a l - a i r f i e l d lees dispersals .

(3) Approximate area for a ir t o a ir rangea -Rectangular area 25 kilometers by 80 k i l o -meters (normally over sea) .

¢4) Approximate " Ja f o r aii ' to ground ranges -Rectrngula:- 5 '"i. -.nei-jr j by 7 k i l o -meters Ir-JQtcd p t o a i r f i e l d as pos -s i b l e , biri lis L^rt ilisj-. 50 kilometers d i s -

, tant. » ,

b . The fol lowing m at ^ifji-iBLi m-re used in Fourth S l i ce , but w i l l require detailed recousitere.tipn by host coun-t r i e s : - , - - - . - ... . . . : .

( 1 ) An a ir tra -i^-'V.' base Tflithc^Tt. any ex is t ing f a c i l i t i e s - ' Ï.913 n i l l i o a .

(2) - Jiir training f a c i l i t i e s portion of i Joint a ir trainJflç ar.u cr^al °.ir ins ta l la t ion -£ t .15 isülioa.-

(? ) Air t o air an'1. ; ;'.r to ground range f a c i l -i t i e s ConteLipl^ietI 1 ' cSorway and Denmark, t o include prt:CiC 1 <.—'. space f o r control cen-

; tre an<2 az^z ' . oz? , asorir-gs f o r targets and boat B1 arid, tv misr;- target revetments -£ 0,02 J r t l l i i - .

5 . JOIMT USE OP FACILITIES -In developing reoCfcnaendatioiia for a i r training f a c i l -

i t i e s , wherever possible a s ingle s i t e w i l l be used t o provide Joint f a c i l i t i e s f o r sncii t r a i n i t j œ d f o r naval a ir purposes. In such oases the cost of the a i t -training portion of the I n s -ta l la t i on w i l l be shown under tlii-j .category with appropriate

^cross referetioe t o the Saval Ais Tields Qagetory.

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O tfÂÏÔ'SEGKÈT o 6. Proposals for facilities needed for joint use of

AAPCE and APSE air forces «ill be made by CIHCSOOHi, in füll Coordination with CIHCAIRCEBTRaL.

7 . FCBMAT -Pifth Slice recommended programs for air training

facilities will be submitted in the following format ; TAB E

(Command)(Pile No.!

BjSOCMMEMDEP FIPTH SUgE (Command}

MJMO Come« IBFRA3TRÖCTUBB PROGRAM

ERAjmms FACILITIES TOR AIR FPBOES

1. HtOCBAM 3UMMARY -

Serial Country Estimated Cost (Pounds) M (C)

1 2 etc

TOTAl

2. PROQRaM JUSTIFICAiTIQH -(Shoulâ INCITE"^t^&äpient OIL joint use for both air

training and naval air when contemplated. The additional facil-ities required should be justified by showing tlie computations of total aircraft crews to be trained versus the capacity of existing or alxeady programed facilities).

J. ^PROJECTS BY COUNTRIES -a.

(Country )

Serial Type of Facility location Planned User Nation

Estimated Cost

(Pounds) U ) tb) to) Id) (e)

t 2 etc

TOTAl

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

< M T O s e c r e t . , o IB QJEOT JUSTinCAJICif

(This should include for each base or range an attached detailed estimate giving quantities and unit costs ) .

(Country)

(Continue with successive paragraphs for each additional country, showing North jifrica separately).

E - 4

JUUD SBCKET

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

3a i l A i O O t t J t t & l Appendix F , to Annex H

-- - ' LOG 6100/5/E-1It/53

FLAEHiaQ GUIDAROE FOH MAIg OOMBCM ItmjAS1ERBffrURE

CATEGORY - .TRAINIHG FACILITIES FCR IAITD IOHOES

1 . DEFIHI1PIOFL OF CAJBTKBY

Training insta l lat ions f o r i n t e r - a l l i e d training under international contro l , not ' inc luding- ' fac i l i t ies r e -quired by nations f o r the training which i s a' national r e s -pons ib i l i ty .

2 . HigylCXJS FIFTH SLIOE ESTIMATES a . Tentative estimates of F i f th Sl ice requirements

f o r training f a c i l i t i e s f o r Osnd forces , aa submitted i n SHAPE/ 706/52, ware : ,

( l ) One 'divisional training area - 2 .6 mil l ion pounds

(£) One medium and heavy tank range - 0.6 mi l -l ion pounds

(3) One ant i -a i r c rà f t range - 0 .8 mi l l i on pounds. 1 •, i

b . The above costs were rough approximations sup-porting the SHAEB Tentative F i f th S l i ce Infrastructure Require-ments, which require detai led revision by J»ost nation or by appropriate authorit ies f o r projects located in Germany.

3. BASIS MM OOMHTTINfl RFQmREtOM1S The recommended.Fifth Sl ice program should take ac -

oount o f the f a c i l i t i e s needed f o r 1955 land force goals , l ess exist ing f a c i l i t i e s and less f a c i l i t i e s in iJHaPE/1420/52 and in SHAPE/1/53, u t i l i z i n g the fol lowing planning fac tors !

a. One d iv is ional training area w i l l permit t ra in-ing per year of about s ix divis ions plus corps troops from two corps ; • - ..

b . One ant i -a i r c ra f t a r t i l l e r y battalion range w i l l permit training of about tÄälve battal ions per year ;

c . One medium and heavy tank battalion range w i l l permit training of about ten battalions per year.

4» POST ESTIMATES Standards governing construction of land f o r c e s t ra in-

ing f a c i l i t i e s based upon recommendations made by ALFCE (ALFCE/ 2695/B3/S

dated 12 Lecanber 193^) are being developed within 3HAEB. Pending receipt of SHAFE recommended standards, those de -veloped by AIfCE w i l l be used in costing Fi f th Sl ice recommend-ations and estimating remaining requirements. In tills connection,

F - 1 JflATO SHCKET

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

33 O i>tATO.£ECiütf O particular care -will be taten to exclude f a c i l i t i e s for indi-vidual or small unit trsiining, which are national- responsibil -i t i e s and are not e l ig ib le f o r inclusion in JHA d Öonmon programs.

5. FOBMaJ ' AtPCE Pifta -Slice reeOHmended programs f o r land forces

training f a c i l i t i e s w i l l be submitted in the following format i

- • - - ••TAB 5

(CammanaMtfiIe Ho.)

EBCCWMBEKKD PIFiPB SLICE (Command)

HJjTO mmwCM INFRASTRUCTURE HiOgiAH

TRAIBIHg PAOILIfIES - FOR IAKD FOBOB3

1, HtOGBAM. SUMMARY

Serial Country Estimated Cost (Pounds) "(a)' ' (¾ ,, ,, (O)

f 2

etc j

TOTAL ...J

2. HtQgRjtM JBgDIFiqATIOK (BhoulS include justificationJCor additional f a c i l -

i t i e s required by showing the computations of t o ta l units to be trained versus the capacity of existing or already pro-grammed f a c i l i t i e s ) .

% FRQ JEfifB BY OOttTORIBS

a. (Country)

Type of Faci l i ty Location Planned User

Kations

Estimated Cost

(Pounds) (a) (b) (C) (d) , (a), 1 2

etc TMAÎ,

NATO SECRET i

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

34 O IM/ÛO SfiCKiil O HtOJECTS JUSTIPICATI0¾

(This should Include for each training facility, an at-tached detailed estimate giving quantities and unit costs).

b. (Country)

(Continue with successive paragraphs for each additional country)-

F - 3 NATO SECRET

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

3$ i l M O SECKBr O n JLppendli C t o Annax--II

LOG 6t00/5/E-111/53

PLAHNMG CtIIDAMGg POR BATO CCiralOW IHTEAgCHtICTORE

CATEGORY - WAK HEADQUARTERS

1, DEFIHITIgS OP CATEGOEY -War Headquarters required t o complète the minimum

essential protected insta l lat ions needed f o r the higher echelons of Al l ied Command Europe.

2 . BASIS PCR CCMPOTIgG REQOIflBlEMTS -War Headquarters pro jects recommended' under the

de f in i t i on given in paragraph t , above, w i l l be computed in accordance with the c r i t e r i a set forth, in LOG 6123/12/E-92/53 dated 7 February 1953.

3. • OBVIOUSLY SUBMITTED RECQMMENDAJIQMS -For information only, the fo l lowing tabulation

l i s ts - certain pertinent, previously submitted War HeaSquartera pro jects ;

fA l l f igures in mil l ion pounds s ter l ing ) Ser-i a l Country and Items

Second Incre-ment SHAPE/

1286/52 SHAPE/706/52

U> . (b) ( C ) (d) t FRAHOE :

a . Alternate VHP connection to general network f o r combined War HQ Central Army Group/4 ASAP b . Combined War Headquarters Southern Army Group/1 ATAP. (Bot required u n t i l a f t e r D-Day). c . Completion of b . above.

0.10

0.4-9 0.10

2 HEftCfjmn = Oable connection t o VHP system and supplementary connection to general network f o r combined War HQ Northern Army Oroup/3 AT AP. 0.1t»

aS jgrmm^umn • Oable connection t o VHF system and supplementary connection to general network f o r Ccmbined War HQ Korthem Army Group/2 ATAP (on the assumption that the headquarters concerned are to be constructed in the He-therlands). 0.01

-

0 - 1

NATO SECKET DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

36 o m s Q s m o <a) • - fh) | fc) (d) 4 HOBWflY :

a. Tactical Air Pivision War , HQ MortK Horway * 0,15 b. ïactical Air Division War = HQ South Norway ; ; 0.08 c. Tentative requirement for War HQ Allied Land Forces ; Northern Eurone - • •..- ' 0,10

5 TURKEY : . War HQ OOML^NDSOUTHEAST l J 0.75

i

KC Efr : a. In serial 5* above, the amount shown in

column Cd> is the tentative estimate for Fifth Slice as contained, on, paee_J.-10 of SHAPE/1286/52.

b. Serials X.b. and I.e.. above, tf resubmitted, will be completely rejustified as to military necessity,

c. The eligibility of serials 4.a, and b. as .•Common, infrastructure has been strongly questioned by the Military Committee. They therefore will not be resubmitted without compelling justification.

4, The exact location of war headquarters trill not be specified in writing, but will be given verbally at the SHAPE meetings.

EQBJ-At - ' Fifth Slice reconmanded programs for War Head-

quarters will tie submitted in the following format : TAB G J /53 (Command)(File No.)

RECOiftENDED FIFTH SLICE ( Command) !

NATO C OJ JtlOW IHFR ASTRUCTPRB PROgRAIt WAR HEADOmtftTBpS

1. HtOtSt AH SUHMftRY -

Serial Country , — • . — '.Estimated cost Pounds

fa) .. (Ji)1 (c)_. _ 1 2 etc I

1 TOTAL ;

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O ,. O 37 i*ÄTO SEÇJ^iT.

2. iROGRAM just i f i ca t ion -

3. HtOJECTS BT OOUMIRIEa - -.

(Country)

Serial Type of Facil ity User Hation

Sstimated Cost (Founds)

(S) (b) (d) 1 War Headquarters 1 War Headquarters

a. Engineer Works b. Signals

(1) Internal communication (2) Connections to the

transmitter and r e c e i -ver s i tes . (Cable of quads}

(3) Cable connections to the general network (Cable of quads}

(4) VHF connections to the general network (Number of channels...)

(5) 2

EROJBCT JUSTIFICATION -The detailed Justifioatioiiis for each spec i f i c war head-

quarters project wi l l include the following information : a. Evidence that in selecting the s i te f u l l cogniz-

ance was taken of the combined engineer works and signal costs and that the most economical solution, consistent with the mil -itary requirements was selected.

b . Extent to which existing f a c i l i t i e s are used and degree of protection proposed.

c . Extent to which construction and équipent pro-vided under the International Budget have been taken into ac -count in o f fsett ing requirements.

d. Justif ication of the number of c i rcui ts required t o connect the war headquarters to the general network.

e. Attached detailed estimates gisiig quantities and unit costs.

NATO SEGKET -DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

r - f " O O

iNÄIO SEGREf,. f. War Headquarters criteria ..bisse .f>eeu_utilizêd in developing the project.

b. -I1 Country.) .. „ .

(Continue with successive paragraphs for eaoh additional country). - -

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O O V ^ 39 i ^ Ä T O .£ECKH.T <

Annex I I I t o LOG 6100/5/B-111/53

GPIDAHCgl FOR SPE,OTTiaQ TEHTA1TIVE EfaTIilftTES

MATO COLUMN INFRASTRUCTURE C"FIFJSL ItBOPIKSENTS1")

1. peflnfttjon of Total Regaining "Final Requirements"; The "Final Requirements" estlnate w i l l consist of only

those additional items of new construction which qualify under the c r i t e r ia prescribed for b MATD common infrastructure" and which are required over and above a l l NATO common projects already programmed under the f i r s t four Sl ices and those being recommended for the F i f th Sl l ce i In order to complete HB NATO common orogram in auopcrt of to ta l SACEOR force requireuents as currently projected. Although designated f o r convenience in reference as "Final Requirements", i t i s recognized that these may not be programed In a single year.

2. Force Basis; j The f o rce requirements furnished f o r broad futute planning J

pur D ose s in SHAPE/1215/52 of 8 Novenber 1952) «fill be used as a basis for these estimates, Suoplemental naval force requireuents wi l l be furnished subsequently.

3. Hature Effld Puyppse of Estluates; jj Estliiatos of "Final Requirements" wi l l be aDproxloate, |

rough estlaates which wi l l provide the order of oagnitude of the r: t o ta l remaining "NATO ccjmon infrastructure", for the purpose of providing NATO agencies with information for long range planning, and to enable a general assessment of total goals in order to place 1 F i f t h Slice recommendations and other planning f igures in proper \ perspective against the back-ground of to ta l requirements. •

The same oriterla w i l l be followed in determining the ; e l i g i b i l i t y of requirements for inclusion in the "Final Requirements" J estlaates as have been prescribed f o r the Fi f th S l i c e . ,{

S. Coordination; ^ General coordination wi l l be achieved with host and user

nations, and approxioate cost estimates w i l l be obtained from host nations.

SMngAs. J teog :

Bemalnlng requirements for signals communications w i l l be fi estimated by SHAljE, based unon total c i r cu i t requirements furnished by subordinate commands in response to SHAPE AG 6106/B-5 SIG/TI dated6 February 1953» I t ""Hl be assumed that the Fi f th Slice completes a l l radar warning and radio navigational requirements for Allied command Europe which wi l l be included in NATO common programs.

- 1 -NATO iSECRET- • • D

EC

LASS

IFIE

D -

PUB

LIC

LY D

ISC

LOSE

D -

PD

N(2

012)

0008

- D

ÉC

LASS

IFIÉ

- M

IS E

N L

EC

TU

RE

PU

BLI

QU

E

'<>"'". • 0 ^ATO SEcmr .,.

7« Vfer Hgfift^py»oi...

Pleted by ^ e r e I u l r e ^ 1 1 t 3 «>* assumed to be com-

8i Portât ;

aus t o two I j e e S l p la ies ! S h 0 u l d b e i a n i l l l o n oound s sterl ln«

- 2 -

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

AX O O i M A ' l U SECiUiT

Enclosure to Annex III LOG 6lOO/5 /E- l l l /53^ (Command/ (Fi le HoJ

TENTATIVE EST IlMTES OF TOTAL REltArilIWG HEOtTIBEHBWTS FOfl IjfflO CQjffiTON IBFK ASTR ÏÏCTPRE

("flHAfr REOUIFJjENTgn)

1. JROGRAËt StEilIAKY

I Serial •

I Country 1 Estimated Cost in

i.JilHon Pounds Sterling (

<<,) I M t (<•)

L ! 1 j

2 I !

Etc. ' 1

; T O T A L j

2. ESTI.lATEfc BT COtMTRIES

(Country)

Serial j Category 1 Estimated Cost in . t i l l ion Pounds Sterling

! "Ta1I 1 " ' (b) I ( c )

1 i j 2 j i

Etc. ) i ! i j T O T A L ;

3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION Of CArEGOE^ES: (For each oategory of Infrastructure shown, give as .inch aa -oossible of the sue porting detai ls prescribed for the F i f th Sl ice submissions).

(Country) (Continue with successive subparagraphs for each addition, ' a l country).

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

O . - - (> - iMÄlU SECtoSi Airnex IV t o

100 6100/5/E-111 /53 11.

Ugr OP REFERENCES

1. 8 Hoveober 1951 - M0-36 : "Division of Responsibilities in wartime between National Territorial Oomiianders and Su-preme and Subordinate Allied Comaanders".

. 2, 19 February 1952 - MC 22/12 (PEf Ai) : -Revision of the-Terms of Reference of the Supreme Allied Commander Europe".

3- 18 March 1952 - Standing Oroup Message STAUS 303 which states :

"The Standing Group requests appropriate national authorities to furnish on request of ÎTATO Command-ées the details of purely national force build-up programs and existing and planned infrastructure to enable the DATO Commands to formulate without duplication and with maximum economy their NATO Common uae infrastructure programs".

4. 24 March 1952 - SHAPE IOG 6)61/SV/284/52 : "SHAPE Criteria and Standards for Tactical Airfields'1 ,

5. 25 May 1952 - AAFCE/403/52 : "Proposed Allied Air Forces Central Europe Infrastructure Program for 1953, 1954 and later" .

6 . 30 May 1952 - HAFSE/457/52 ; "HAFSE Infrastructure Programs Southern Europe".

7. 5 June 1952 - AENE 6100/52/401 : "Fourth and'Fifth Slice Infrastructure Programs, Northern Europe".

8. 25 June 1952 - SHAEB/591/52 : "SHAPE Eeoommended 'Fourth Slice' Infrastructure Programs*,

9 . 2 August 1952 - SHAPE/706/52 : "Estimated tentative Requlrenients for 3HAIΠ1Piftb and later Sl ice ' of KATO Common Infrastructure".

10. 14 August 1952 - SHAPB IOG 6100/10/1-440/52 to OIKO- . NORTH i "Estimated Tentative Requirements for SHAEB 'Fifth* and ' later ' Slices of NATO Common Infrastructure - SHAPE Screening Action on Proposals of Subordinate Commands",

11. 5 September (952 - SHAPE LOG 6)00/1-463/52 to CINOLAWD-CEWT : "Betlmated Tentative Requirements f o r SHAIE 'Pifth1 and . ' later ' Slices of NATO Common Infrastructure - SHAEE Screening Action on Proposals of Subordinate Command's".

12. 11 September 1952 - SHAPE LOG 61 OO/IOA-471 /52 to CINO-SOUTH : "Estimated Requirements for SHAEE 'Fi fth ' artd 'Later' Slices of NATO Common Infrastructure - SHAPE Screening Aotion on Proposals of Subordinate Commands".

13. 30 September 1952 - HAJSE 906/52 : "HAFSE Fourth and Later Slice Infrastructure Programs for SlEECE and TÜRKEI".

- 1 -

NATO SECRET DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE

M ï o SECKET o

14. )6 October 1952 - SHAE^ KW- 6100/1-603/52 : "Eeapons-, - i b i i i t l e e f o r HJlSO Common Inf'raatÄctiiM'*-.

15- 20 October 1952 - APKH 1038/6100 t "Review and Screen-ing of Fourth Sl ice Infrastructure Program - Northern Eu-rope" .

16. 21 October 1952 - SHAfB AS 6100 310 : "SHAEE Signals Infrastructure*.

17. 5 Hovmber 1952 - HAFSS 1045/52 : 'HAFSBReVised Fourth Slice Naval Infrastructure Program and Cost Estimates".

10. S November 1952 - SHAPB/l215/52 : "SACEUR's Havised Force Requirements*,

19, 10 November 1952 - SRASE Message SH 26)72, implementing SHAEE LOO 6100/1-603/52 dated 16 October 1952 - "Respons-i b i l i t i e s f o r NATO Common Infrastructure".

21 November 1952 - EKAPE/1267/52 ; "Fourth Sl ice In f ra -structure Program - Further Details of Signal Communica-t ions , Badar and Navigational Aid f a c i l i t i e s " .

21. 24 November 1952 - HAFSE Message ES 73647 : "Naval Air f ie ld Estimates*.

25 Novanber 1952 - aiAEE/t2B6/52 : "SHAEE Eeoommended * Fourth Slice Infrastructure Program".

23. 4 December 1952 - HATO AC/4-D/l 18. (Revised) "Report by the Working Group of Jet Fuel Experts".

1 2 C a c e n b e r 1 9 5 2 - A L F C E / 2 6 9 5 / B 3 / S 1 » c r i t e r i a a n d p l a n n i n g S t a n d a r d s t o G d v e r n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f W T O Common L a n d F o r c e s T r s i n i T i g F a c i l i t i e s « .

25. 15 December 1952 - HANFSE 190 : -"Criteria and planning Standards f o r StLAfE Naval A i r f i e l d s " .

26. 23 December 1952 - SHAIE/1420/52 : "Implementation of i> Approved Portion of Fourth Slice Infrastructure Progra«*.

27. 7 January 1953 - SHAPE/1/53 : "Annual Review Con- ' sideratioii of Remining Fourth S l i ce Infrastructure" .

28. 6 February 1953 - SHAPE AG 6106/B-5 SIG/PI : " t e l e -communications Infrastructure" .

29. 7 February 1953 - LOO 6123/12/E-92/53 : »Criteria for J t Var Headquarters Construction".

50. February 1953 - SHAPE Message SH 27489 {SHAPTO 397) 1OOBtnunlcatiOils - Blectronios Construction Standards for

" " " ' J HATO Airfields".

fc^iiSf - 2 ,

DE

CLA

SSIF

IED

- PU

BLI

CLY

DIS

CLO

SED

- P

DN

(201

2)00

08 -

DÉ

CLA

SSIF

IÉ -

MIS

EN

LE

CT

UR

E P

UB

LIQ

UE