water survey summary€¦ · summary prepared by julian eleuterio (brazil), shafi islam...
TRANSCRIPT
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 1
WATER SURVEY SUMMARY
prepared by Julian ELEUTERIO (Brazil), Shafi ISLAM (Bangladesh)
& Camilo MUNOZ-TROCHEZ (Colombia) 1st June 2010 Salle Jean Vilar, Arcueil (France)
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 2
Results of 2009 and 2010 surveys66 cities spread over 4 continents
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 3
City Characteristics
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 4
Total Number Of Cities
• 31 countries• 66 cities• Including 15 new cities for 2010
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 5
Some are cities, some are regions
City area is really variable
22 000 km2
4 km2
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 6
Tunisia - Sfax
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 7
Biggest cities are in Asia. But they are the most scarce in the data collected
Population is also very variable
17 000 inhabitants
500 inhabitants
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 8
Egypt - Cairo
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 9
Water Source
• European cities use basically groundwater and rivers.
• American cities use rivers, lakes and groundwater.
• Asian cities use rivers• African cities use rivers and groundwater
Need for river and groundwater care
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 10
Spain - Zaragoza
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 11
Drinking Water Access
• A trend of using in-house water tap was found
• However the coverage wasn’t 100% for all cities so some cities use combined sources
Need to consider intermittent water systems
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 12
Bangladesh - Dhaka
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 13
Plenty of opportunities for water utilities improvement
Public utilities are the most common all over the world
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 14
A lot of changes from public to private water
utilities or mixed operation
Water utility age (years)
160 years
< 10 years
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 15
United States of America - Chicago
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 16
Presence of Mega cities
Water utility daily production (m3 / day)
5 M m3 / day
500 m3 / day
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 17
Brazil – Sao Paulo & Pirapora
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 18
Water price
ISSUES
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 19
Household water bill (€/month/household)
Household income (€/month/household)
Water Bill / IncomeYounde (Cameroon) 8.9%Chengdu (China) 8.5%Sfax (Tunisia) 8.0%München (Germany) 7.3%Ziguinchor (Senegal) 6.6%Kairouan (Tunisia) 6.0%Agboville (Ivory coast) 6.0%Montes Claros (Brazil) 5.7%Yaoundé (Cameroon) 5.6%Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 5.3%SIE Lillion (France) 4.4%Pirapora (Brazil) 4.2%Douala (Cameroon) 4.0%Obera (Argentina) 3.7%Bogotá (Colombia) 3.5%Cali (Colombia) 3.4%Accra (Ghana) 3.0%Cairo (Egypt) 3.0%Porto Alegre (Brazil) 2.9%São Paulo (Brazil) 2.9%
Paris (France) 2.7%Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 2.5%Nantes (France) 2.3%Abeokuta (Nigeria) 2.1%Magurele (Romania) 1.4%Istanbul (Turkey) 1.3%Walloon Region (Belgium) 1.0%Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 1.0%Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.9%Delhi (India) 0.5%
Water bill = 9% of family income
Water bill = 0.5% of income
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 20
Measures for low income households (2010 survey: 15 cities only)
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 21
Coca Cola price (€/liter)
Water price (€/liter)
Coca Cola price (€/L ) / Water price (€/L)Kairouan (Tunisia) 10000Cali (Colombia) 8500Sfax (Tunisia) 6250Kebili (Tunisia) 5982Chengdu (China) 4067Accra (Ghana) 4000Agboville (Ivory coast) 3995Dakar (Senegal) 3571Libertad (Uruguay) 3333Khouribga (Marocco) 3333Younde (Cameroon) 3333Douala (Cameroon) 3304Cotonou (Bénin) 3300Chicago (U.S.A.) 2500Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 2344Montes Claros (Brazil) 1836Ziguinchor (Senegal) 1652Campinas (Brazil) 1583Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 1500Abeokuta (Nigeria) 1400Zaragoza (Spain) 1322Almada (Portugal) 1290Guadalajara (Mexico) 1280Pirapora (Brazil) 1202Yaoundé (Cameroon) 1200Magurele (Romania) 1108Vespasiano (Brazil) 1033Porto Alegre (Brazil) 1000Tulancingo (Peru) 875Obera (Argentina) 781
Paris (France) 692München (Germany) 685Istanbul (Turkey) 667SIE Lillion (France) 628Tromsø (Norway) 625Nantes (France) 598Bogotá (Colombia) 575São Paulo (Brazil) 533Ferrara (Italy) 314Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 300Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 298Walloon Region (Belgium) 225Saint Maur des Fossés (France) 204
Coke = 10,000 water price
Coke = 204 water price
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 22
Service quality
ISSUES
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 23
Delivery problemsBeyrouth (Lebanon) 2.8Nairobi (Kenya) 2.8Accra (Ghana) 2.8Douala (Cameroon) 2.3Younde (Cameroon) 2.3Ziguinchor (Senegal) 2.2Dakar (Senegal) 2.0Tulancingo (Peru) 2.0Dhaka (Bangladesh) 2.0São Paulo (Brazil) 1.8Cotonou (Bénin) 1.8Delhi (India) 1.8Obera (Argentina) 1.5Yaoundé (Cameroon) 1.3Kairouan (Tunisia) 1.3Cali (Colombia) 1.3Cairo (Egypt) 1.0Athens (Greece) 1.0Khouribga (Marocco) 0.8Abeokuta (Nigeria) 0.8Agboville ((Ivory coast)) 0.8Guadalajara (Mexico) 0.8Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 0.8Istanbul (Turkey) 0.8SIE Lillion (France) 0.8Sfax (Tunisia) 0.6Pirapora (Brazil) 0.6Kebili (Tunisia) 0.5Vespasiano (Brazil) 0.5San José (Costa Rica) 0.5Magurele (Romania) 0.5Chicago (U.S.A.) 0.4Campinas (Brazil) 0.3Porto Alegre (Brazil) 0.3Libertad (Uruguay) 0.3Chengdu (China) 0.3Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 0.3Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 0.2Zaragoza (Spain) 0.2Tromsø (Norway) 0.2Bogotá (Colombia) 0.0Montes Claros (Brazil) 0.0Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.0München (Germany) 0.0Nantes (France) 0.0
Paris (France) 0.0Walloon Region (Belgium) 0.0Ferrara (Italy) 0.0Almada (Portugal) 0.0Saint Maur des Fossés (France) 0.0
Price problemsNairobi (Kenya) 3.0Abeokuta (Nigeria) 3.0Accra (Ghana) 2.5Yaoundé (Cameroon) 2.5Vespasiano (Brazil) 2.5Beyrouth (Lebanon) 2.5Douala (Cameroon) 2.0Ziguinchor (Senegal) 2.0Dakar (Senegal) 2.0Cotonou (Bénin) 2.0Bogotá (Colombia) 2.0Montes Claros (Brazil) 2.0Dhaka (Bangladesh) 2.0Nantes (France) 2.0
Paris (France) 2.0Walloon Region (Belgium) 2.0Khouribga (Marocco) 1.5Agboville ((Ivory coast)) 1.5Sfax (Tunisia) 1.5Kebili (Tunisia) 1.5Tulancingo (Peru) 1.5Pirapora (Brazil) 1.5San José (Costa Rica) 1.5Younde (Cameroon) 1.0Kairouan (Tunisia) 1.0Cairo (Egypt) 1.0São Paulo (Brazil) 1.0Obera (Argentina) 1.0Cali (Colombia) 1.0Porto Alegre (Brazil) 1.0Magurele (Romania) 1.0Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 1.0München (Germany) 1.0Ferrara (Italy) 1.0Almada (Portugal) 1.0Guadalajara (Mexico) 0.5Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 0.5Campinas (Brazil) 0.5Libertad (Uruguay) 0.5Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.5Chengdu (China) 0.5Athens (Greece) 0.5SIE Lillion (France) 0.5Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 0.5Zaragoza (Spain) 0.5Chicago (U.S.A.) 0.0Delhi (India) 0.0Istanbul (Turkey) 0.0Tromsø (Norway) 0.0Saint Maur des Fossés (France) 0.0
Water sanity problemsDouala (Cameroon) 3.0Khouribga (Marocco) 3.0Younde (Cameroon) 3.0Cairo (Egypt) 3.0Tulancingo (Peru) 3.0Guadalajara (Mexico) 3.0Beyrouth (Lebanon) 3.0München (Germany) 3.0Ziguinchor (Senegal) 2.0Agboville ((Ivory coast)) 2.0Sfax (Tunisia) 2.0São Paulo (Brazil) 2.0Dhaka (Bangladesh) 2.0SIE Lillion (France) 2.0Vespasiano (Brazil) 1.5Ferrara (Italy) 1.5Dakar (Senegal) 1.0Kebili (Tunisia) 1.0Bogotá (Colombia) 1.0Montes Claros (Brazil) 1.0San José (Costa Rica) 1.0Cali (Colombia) 1.0Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 1.0Campinas (Brazil) 1.0Chicago (U.S.A.) 1.0Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 1.0Athens (Greece) 1.0Nairobi (Kenya) 0.7Abeokuta (Nigeria) 0.7Yaoundé (Cameroon) 0.7Cotonou (Bénin) 0.7Chengdu (China) 0.7Delhi (India) 0.7Istanbul (Turkey) 0.7Nantes (France) 0.7
Paris (France) 0.7Walloon Region (Belgium) 0.7Libertad (Uruguay) 0.5Accra (Ghana) 0.0Kairouan (Tunisia) 0.0Pirapora (Brazil) 0.0Obera (Argentina) 0.0Porto Alegre (Brazil) 0.0Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.0Magurele (Romania) 0.0Almada (Portugal) 0.0Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 0.0Zaragoza (Spain) 0.0Tromsø (Norway) 0.0Saint Maur des Fossés (France) 0.0
Max.
Min.
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 24
Global problemsBeyrouth (Lebanon) 2.8Douala (Cameroon) 2.4Tulancingo (Peru) 2.2Nairobi (Kenya) 2.1Younde (Cameroon) 2.1Ziguinchor (Senegal) 2.1Dhaka (Bangladesh) 2.0Khouribga (Marocco) 1.8Accra (Ghana) 1.8Dakar (Senegal) 1.7Cairo (Egypt) 1.7São Paulo (Brazil) 1.6Vespasiano (Brazil) 1.5Cotonou (Bénin) 1.5Yaoundé (Cameroon) 1.5Abeokuta (Nigeria) 1.5Agboville ((Ivory coast)) 1.4Guadalajara (Mexico) 1.4Sfax (Tunisia) 1.4München (Germany) 1.3Cali (Colombia) 1.1SIE Lillion (France) 1.1Kebili (Tunisia) 1.0San José (Costa Rica) 1.0Bogotá (Colombia) 1.0Montes Claros (Brazil) 1.0Nantes (France) 0.9
Paris (France) 0.9Walloon Region (Belgium) 0.9Obera (Argentina) 0.8Athens (Greece) 0.8Ferrara (Italy) 0.8Delhi (India) 0.8Kairouan (Tunisia) 0.8Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 0.8Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 0.8Pirapora (Brazil) 0.7Campinas (Brazil) 0.6Magurele (Romania) 0.5Istanbul (Turkey) 0.5Chengdu (China) 0.5Chicago (U.S.A.) 0.5Porto Alegre (Brazil) 0.4Libertad (Uruguay) 0.4Almada (Portugal) 0.3Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 0.2Zaragoza (Spain) 0.2Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.2Tromsø (Norway) 0.1Saint Maur des Fossés (France) 0.0
Water household priceSaint Maur des Fossés (France) 3.93Ferrara (Italy) 3.50Urban Community of Strasbourg (France) 3.12Neuilly-sur-Marne (France) 3.00Walloon Region (Belgium) 2.93
Paris (France) 2.89Nantes (France) 2.51SIE Lillion (France) 2.23São Paulo (Brazil) 1.50Istanbul (Turkey) 1.50München (Germany) 1.46Tromsø (Norway) 1.28Vespasiano (Brazil) 0.92Tulancingo (Peru) 0.80Porto Alegre (Brazil) 0.74Zaragoza (Spain) 0.73Bogotá (Colombia) 0.73Almada (Portugal) 0.69Magurele (Romania) 0.65Obera (Argentina) 0.64Pirapora (Brazil) 0.52Yaoundé (Cameroon) 0.50Campinas (Brazil) 0.48Ziguinchor (Senegal) 0.46Douala (Cameroon) 0.46Younde (Cameroon) 0.45Caraguatatuba (Brazil) 0.40Chicago (U.S.A.) 0.40Accra (Ghana) 0.40Agboville (Ivory coast) 0.39Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 0.32Abeokuta (Nigeria) 0.30Cotonou (Bénin) 0.30Libertad (Uruguay) 0.30Montes Claros (Brazil) 0.29Dakar (Senegal) 0.28Guadalajara (Mexico) 0.25Khouribga (Marocco) 0.15Chengdu (China) 0.15Cali (Colombia) 0.12Sfax (Tunisia) 0.08Kebili (Tunisia) 0.08Kairouan (Tunisia) 0.07Dhaka (Bangladesh) 0.03
Max.
Min.
3.9 €/m3
0.03 €/m3
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 25
OUR PERSONAL OPINION
49 participants
2009 & 2010 WWW-YES workshops
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 26
Water production and/or distribution should be public or private? Why?
• 39 participants: it should be PUBLIC– Control of financial profit– Control of water price
• 10 participants : it should be PRIVATE– Ability to meet rising water demands– Good examples of private management
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 27
Citizens should be involved in the water management?
• 44 participants: YES• 5 participants: NO
• How should citizens be involved?– 40% - consumer organisation– 19% - NGO
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 28
Should drinking water be for free?
• 13 participants: YES• 36 participants: NO
• For whom?– 67% - Depending on household income– 33% - Depending on consumed volume
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 29
Gender
ISSUES
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 30
• Role of woman in housework (or in providing drinking water)– Average: 77%
• Proportion of woman in user committee– Average: 38%
• Water production or distribution director– Man: 100%
• Local water service director– Man: 100%
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 31
Conclusions
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 32
• Through 3 sessions of the WWW- YES workshop– 66 cites have been surveyed for their
drinking water system and its operation– 49 participants expressed their
personal opinion– Survey results have been presented to
and discussed with the public• Significant involvement of young
scientists for world water problems
1 June 2010 WWW-YES-2010 water survey summary 33
Any questions or comments?