water quality dynamics in semiarid regions with temporary
TRANSCRIPT
Palermo - 2004 Water Quality Protection and ManagementProf. Dr.-Ing. habil. Herwig LehmannUniversity of Hannover
Jochen Froebrich
Water quality dynamics in semiarid regions with temporary streams
Water quality dynamics in semiarid regions with temporary streams
Jochen Froebrich
Water quality protection and management group,University Hannover, Germany
specialized in water management problemsfor semi-arid regions (MENA, Central Asia)
Co-ordinator of tempQsim
Domain leader water availability, AQUASTRESS
availability of safe water resources by combined water quality and quantity management
introduction
•to introduce the project tempQsim
•typical water quality dynamics intemporary streams
•outline of future mitigation options
•conclusions for modelling strategies
structure
Rational
In many water stressed regions world wide: • water use from reservoirs at risk due to
eutrophication and toxic algae blooms
• reservoir capacity losses by sedimentation
adapted quality mangement needs knowledgeon pollution pathways and adapted management tools
EU-WFD & EU-WIMC adresses improvement of water quality in the framework of IWRM
tempQsim in brief
water quality dynamics
Intermittent streams:are dry part of the year, but contain flow when the groundwater is high enough as well as during and after a storm event.
Ephemeral streams:contain water during and immediately after a storm event but are dry the rest of the year.
tempQsim in brief
temporary watersforms a major part of the catchments
about 40% of all catchments in Greece(after Nikolaidis et al. 2004), much higher with consideration of dry tributaries
despite this fact, very vew knowledge on water quality dyanmics, ecosystem functioning and available modelling tools
about 100% in the southern part of Sardinia
large number of ramblas in Spain
tempQsim in brief
objectives:
I N S T IT U T D E R E C H ER C H E P O U RL E D E VE L O P P E M E N T
•to test a number of catchment models in study sites with temporary waters
•to develop detailed conceptual models for each study sites (sediment and water phase)
•to improve modelling tools for its applicability in semi-arid basins
tempQsimtemptempQQsimsim
Dry Months (rf / pet < 0.3)
dry_monthsValue
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Degebe
El Albujon
Véne
Mulargia
Tagliamento Iskar
Krathis
(Irvine, 2004)
Dry Months (rf / pet < 0.3)
dry_monthsValue
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Degebe
El Albujon
Véne
Mulargia
Tagliamento Iskar
Krathis
(Irvine, 2004)
Vallecebre
tempQsim in brief
water quality dynamics
Seasonal sequence
time
wat
er le
vel
sediment
transport
evaporationinfiltration
resuspensiontransport
micriobiological transformations
accumulation
first flush effectfirst flood event
water quality dynamics
00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
22. October 2003
Wat
er le
vel,
cm
Water level
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
PN
PN, m
g/l N
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
PP
PP, m
g/l P
first flush effects
Mulargia, SITE B
Diliberto, Botti, 2004
22.10.2003 21.11.2003 28.01.2004 29.02.2004 17.04.2004 05.05.2004
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Date
Wat
er le
vel,
cm
Water level
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
PN
, mg/
l N
PN
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
PP
, mg/
l P
PP
imortance of first flood events
Mulargia, SITE B
Diliberto, Botti, 2004
water quality dynamics
water quality dynamics
OUTLET
karstic areas agricultural areas urban areas
springs urbandrainage system
RIVER
ACCUMULATION REACHES
WWTP
naturaldrainage system
ACCUMULATION RATESduring drying period1 kg-TP/day - 6 kg-TN/dayin the pools3 kg-TP/day - 8.5 kg-TN/day
DENITRIFICATION RATES25 µg-N-NO3/dayOM in sediments1 – 6 %
Marie George Tournoud, Jean-Louis Perrin, 2004
Dry period
water quality dynamics
OUTLET
karstic areas agricultural areas urban areas
springs urban²drainage system
RIVER
naturaldrainage system
1st FLOOD
3 % runoff coefficient
36 % runoff coefficient3-6 hours duration
Marie George Tournoud, Jean-Louis Perrin, 2004
OUTLET
karstic areas agricultural areas urban areas
springs urbandrainage system
RIVER
naturaldrainage system
2nd FLOOD
3 % runoff coefficientat the outlet
duration: less than 1 daypeak flow: 0.5 – 10 m3/s
velocity: 0.6 – 1.1 m/s⇒ 45 to 50 mn time transfert
high initial losses
Marie George Tournoud, Jean-Louis Perrin, 2004
water quality dynamics
water quality dynamics
Relatively smallcompared to 2nd
flood,significant increase for NH4 , particulate nutrients
Significant30% of annual TSS,10% of total Discharge
Urban stormwater, remobilisation of mass, no discharge at the outlet
Significant for Ptot compared to other floods
KrathisMulargiaVeneAlbujon
major contribution of 1st flood to total load &runoff
water quality dynamics
Significant for all particulate nutrients, increase in NH4NO2, DON & DOP
Only for an exceptional spring flood
The 2nd flood produces the first discharge that reaches the catchment outlet
Indication of high NO3-Nrelease
KrathisMulargiaVeneAlbujon
major contribution of 2nd or later flood
Conclusions
Storms are dominant drivers causing pollution remobilisation and transport
• erosion and washing pollutants from land surfaceare important pathways in sloping areas
• instream resuspension of waste wateroriginated organic matters and nutrients
Conclusions
Accumulation during dry period
contribute to resuspension of waste water originated organic matters and nutrients
Accumulation of sewage water discharge
Accumulation on land side manure, animal faecals, plant residues,nutrient enriched topsoil
Spatial and temporal variability of loads and fluxes
•most important constraint for existing modelling tools
•attractive starting points for practical measures
Conclusions
simulation of purification processes, short time consideration of pollution variability
identification of potential events
settling pondspre-dams
simulation of impact, evaluation of investment efficiency
significance ofpollution pointsources
sewage water treatment
simulation of measure efficiency
identification oferosion hot spots
erosion control
consideration of actual practice and response of the watershed
long term reactionlanduse change
model requirementsrelevant aspects to be considered
Option
simulation of purification processes, short time consideration of pollution variability
identification of potential events
settling pondspre-dams
simulation of impact, evaluation of investment efficiency
significance ofpollution pointsources
sewage water treatment
simulation of measure efficiency
identification oferosion hot spots
erosion control
consideration of actual practice and response of the watershed
long term reactionlanduse change
model requirementsrelevant aspects to be considered
Option
Conclusions
Hydrology:•spatial rainfall distribution •interruption of flow due to transmission losses•sufficiently short time steps during flood events
Water quality: missing capabilities •Linkage of erosive nutrient leaching to rainfall distribution and run-off generation
•mass accumulation between significant floods
Conclusions
PescasPescas HSPFHSPFSWATSWAT Athys-PolTopmodel
Athys-PolTopmodel
europeanscale
large basins, long term simulation
Specialized land phase modelsmore detailedhydrology
distributed hydrological model
Interface: provision of time series for run-off/pollution from land phase
CascadeCascadePescasPescas stream network/pool module
stream network/pool module
european scale adapted routing detailed pool ecologyGW-interaction
Specialized network models:
processingsubdaily
information
processingsubdaily
information
spatial variability in run-off generation,
sediment delivery ratio
spatial variability in run-off generation,
sediment delivery ratio
Additional procedures:
the tempQsim tools
Conclusions
water quality dynamics
variable
technical soil conservationmeasures
rural development policyand land use management
operation of diversion structures, weirs,
flooding of sedimentation areas
operation of diversion structures, weirs,
flooding of sedimentation areas
Increased availability of safe water resources in main rivers and reservoirs
adapted consideration of highly hydrology and poullution dynamic
tempQsimtemptempQQsimsim
improved modelling tools
identification of controlable flow
intervals for diverting higher polluted flows
localisation of highest pollution sources, prioritise of actions
Improvedriver water quality