w. wundtby edmund könig;w. wundt's philosophie und psychologieby rudolf eisler

3
Philosophical Review W. Wundt by Edmund König; W. Wundt's Philosophie und Psychologie by Rudolf Eisler Review by: J. E. C. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Jan., 1903), pp. 101-102 Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2176827 . Accessed: 15/05/2014 08:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Duke University Press and Philosophical Review are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Philosophical Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.78.108.168 on Thu, 15 May 2014 08:22:04 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Upload: review-by-j-e-c

Post on 11-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Philosophical Review

W. Wundt by Edmund König; W. Wundt's Philosophie und Psychologie by Rudolf EislerReview by: J. E. C.The Philosophical Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Jan., 1903), pp. 101-102Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical ReviewStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2176827 .

Accessed: 15/05/2014 08:22

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Duke University Press and Philosophical Review are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to The Philosophical Review.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.78.108.168 on Thu, 15 May 2014 08:22:04 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

No. x.] MOTICES OF NEW BOOKS. I0I

God as the ultimate principle of Christian morality. But how is this will known to men ? Either, it would seem, by a supernatural revelation or by the study of nature, including, of course, human nature. If he declares for the former, he has the difficult task of exhibiting a clear, harmonious, and universally authoritative revelation; if for the latter, he must descend from the clouds and find the divine will in the facts of human experience. As the discussion stands, M. Halleux is left in an ambiguous position be- tween the earth and sky. On the one hand, he declares that II la morale religieuse puise dans la consideration de la vie future un criterium certain de la morality de nos actes" (p. I69); on the other, that "Ila morale th6ologique . . . place le fondement immediate de la loi morale dans les relations naturelles des etres" (p. 175). How can the consideration of a future life furnish a certain criterion of morality, when the very problem of morality is to determine what constitutes a worthful life, whether present or future, short or long ? Indefinite extension or extension to infinity does not answer the question.

W. G. EVERETT. BROWN UNIVERSITY.

A Study of Ethical Principiles. By JAMES SETH, Professor of Moral Phi- losophy in the University of Edinburgh. Sixth edition, revised. Edin- burgh and London, William Blackwood & Sons; New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1902.-Pp. xvi, 470. Advantage has been taken of this opportunity to revise the entire work

once more and to make many minor corrections. There are, however, only two alterations of real importance. These occur (i) in the statement of Butler's theory in terms of Eudacmonism, as well as of Rationalism (Part I, ch. iii, ? I4), and (2) in the discussion of freedom, which is no longer identified with contingency or indetermination, but with self-determination. The latter change of view has led to the alterations of certain statements in Part III, ch. i, ?H 3-5, and to the omission of the criticism of Green's view of the relation of the self to the character (?? 8, 9).

J. S.

W. Wundt. Seine Philosophie und Psychologie. Von EDMUND K6NIG. [Fromanns Klassiker der Philosophie] Stuttgart, Fr. Fromanns Verlag, 1901.-Pp. 207.

W. Wundi's Philosofhie und Psycho/ogle, In ihren Grundlehren darge- stellt. Von RUDOLF EISLER. Leipzig, J. A. Barth, 1902.-pp. Vi, 210.

The scope and purpose of these volumes is in general the same. They both present in a compact form an exposition of Wundt's views on the fundamental questions of philosophy and psychology. Konig's method of treatment was undoubtedly determined largely by the character of the series for which his book was written. The first forty-nine pages deal with Wundt's relation to other current philosophical movements, and with an account of

This content downloaded from 195.78.108.168 on Thu, 15 May 2014 08:22:04 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

102 THE PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW. [VOL. XII.

his scientific history and development. These are followed by an excellent summary of the main results which the Leipzig philosopher has reached in Logic, Psychology, Metaphysics, and Ethics. What we get is thus a broad and general outline of Wundt's many-sided activity, without any attempt to deal in detail even with the fundamental principles. Eisler, on the other hand, has written rather for students of philosophy and psychology than for the general reader. While, therefore, he does not give as full a synopsis of the doctrines as Kbnig, he emphasizes more the main concepts and principles of Wundt's philosophy, and gives numerous references to his writings. The two little volumes supplement each other excellently, K6nig being concerned mainly with a historical outline of the doctrines, while Eisler deals rather with the concepts which constitute the system.

J. E. C.

The Economic Interpiretation of History. By EDWIN R. A. SELIGMAN.

New York (The Columbia University Press), The Macmillan Company, I902.-Pp. iX, I66.

In his Prefatory Note the author tells us that " the present work is sub- stantially a reproduction, with some alterations, additions, and rearrange- ments, of the articles that appeared in Volumes XVI and XVII of the Political Science Quarterly." The book falls into two parts, each com- prising six short chapters. Part I gives the history of the theory of economic interpretation, and Part II furnishes a critical discussion and estimate of the theory. The thesis of the doctrine is stated by the author in the following way: "s The existence of man depends upon his ability to sustain himself; the economic life is, therefore, the fundamental condition of all life. Since human life, however, is the life of man in society, individual existence moves within the framework of the social structure and is modified by it. What the conditions of maintenance are to the individual, the similar relations of production and consumption are to the community. To economic causes, therefore, must be traced in last instances those transformations in the structure of society which themselves condition the relations of social classes and the various manifestations of social life" (p. 3).

The historical portion of the book is mainly devoted to the development of the economic view of history by Marx and his school. Only brief mention is made of Buckle or of any earlier writer. The connection of the German I materialistic' school with Feuerbach and the other adherents of the Hegelian ' Left' is very clearly shown in a chapter entitled " The Philosophical Antecedents of the Theory."

In the critical chapters the author undertakes to answer the main objec- tions that have been brought against the theory, to point out its exaggera- tions, and to furnish a final estimate of it. The objections to which he replies are the following: (I) That the theory of economic interpretation is a fatalistic theory, opposed to the doctrine of free-will and overlooking

This content downloaded from 195.78.108.168 on Thu, 15 May 2014 08:22:04 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions