w. morse may 15, 20071 colliding 5nm beams at the international linear collider william morse...
TRANSCRIPT
W. Morse May 15, 2007 1
Colliding 5nm Beams at the International Linear Collider
William Morse
Brookhaven National Lab
W. Morse May 15, 2007 2
Outline of the Talk• International Linear Collider• See: “Physics Opportunities with a TeV Linear
Collider”, Sally Dawson and Mark Oreglia, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54:269 (2004),
• “Linear Collider Physics in the New Millennium”, A. Soni et al., World Sci. (2005)
• Colliding 5nm e+e- beams
W. Morse May 15, 2007 3
High Energy Colliders
Collider Particle Ecm (TeV)
Years Lum (cm-2s-1)
Tevatron
(Fermi, US)
P-P+ 2 - 2009 1032
2 fb-1/sy
LHC
(CERN, SW)
PP 14 2008 - 6 1033
120 fb-1
ILC (?) e+e- .5 - 1 2019 - 2 1034
200 fb-1
W. Morse May 15, 2007 4
Recent e+e- Colliders
Collider SLAC B
(USA)
KEK B
(Japan)
SLC
(USA)
LEP 1-2
(CERN)
Ecm
(TeV)
0.01 0.01 0.1
polarized
0.1-0.2
Years - 2008 - ? - 1998 - 2000
W. Morse May 15, 2007 6
Exploring the TeraVolt Scale
• Protons are made up of quarks and gluons• Average quark or gluon carries 10% of the
proton’s energy• LHC: 1B uninteresting events/s, ie. need a
trigger• e+e- converts all the beam energy into the
collision energy• ILC: No uninteresting events/s, ie. no trigger!• Polarized electron positron beams• ILC dL/L 310-4 LHC dL/L 0.1
W. Morse May 15, 2007 7
JoAnne Hewett’s Slide
• Common feature of many models is a contact interaction type signature new gauge bosons,
large extra dimensions, compositeness, leptoquarks, string excitations, ….
-
W. Morse May 15, 2007 9
International Linear Collider
• International from the start!• New paradigm for HEP• Global Design Effort of Asia, Europe, America• 2007 Reference Design Report – done!• 2009 Engineering Design Report• 2010 Tevatron/LHC Higgs physics results, ILC
site selection, International funding agreement ?• 2011-2018 Construction??• 2019 First Run ???
W. Morse May 15, 2007 13
Physics - Higgs Mechanism
• Proposed by Peter Higgs almost fifty years ago• Spontaneous symmetry breaking to give particles mass• LEP direct search limit: MH>0.115TeV• Precision Electro-Weak Measurements at Tevatron
/LEP/SLC: MH < 0.2 TeV from virtual processes• Does nature give mass through Peter Higg’s
mechanism?• Only fundamental particle in the standard model with
spin zero!• Only particle in the standard model where the coupling
constant is proportional to mass.
W. Morse May 15, 2007 14
LHC2ILC Fermilab Apr 12-14• Reconstruct Higgs mass with collinear approximation
30 fb-1
H(ll) +2jets (VBF)
H(lh) +2jets (VBF)
W. Morse May 15, 2007 19
Hints of SUSY?
• BNL measurement of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon (2004):
• aexp = 0.0011659208 (6)• aSM = 0.0011659179 (6)• SUSY theorists relieved!• asusy tan/M2
• 0.13TeV < Msusy < 0.47TeV• J. Miller, E. De Rafael, B. Roberts, hep-ph 0703049
(2007) Review Article.
W. Morse May 15, 2007 21
Nominal ILC Parameters
Parameter ILC (0.5TeV) SLC (0.09TeV)
Luminosity 21034 cm-2s-1 21030 cm-2s-1
BX/s 15K .12K
y 5nm 500nm
x 500nm 1500nm
e/BX 21010 41010
W. Morse May 15, 2007 22
Feedback
• SLC found they needed feedback to optimize the luminosity with 1m beams – mainly beam position monitors (BPM).
• What detectors do we need to stabilize the beams at the 5nm level to achieve the design luminosity?
• 100V kicker.
W. Morse May 15, 2007 24
Achieving the ILC Luminosity Will Be a Challenge
• Bunch P- (t) {N, E, x, y, z, x, y, z, xy, x, y}• Bunch P+(t) {N, E, x, y, z, x, y, z, xy, x, y}• Beam motion >> 5nm!• Instantaneous Luminosity:
oy
ox
oo NNtL
)(
x
y
W. Morse May 15, 2007 25
Beam-strahlung Gammas
• F = e(E + cB)• E = 0, Bmax 1KT• P 3% Pe 0.4MW• N 1.5Ne 31010 /BX
mc
FrP
3
2 220
yzx
x
ycNeB
0
W. Morse May 15, 2007 26
Beam-strahlung Pairs
• Bethe-Heitler: e → e e+e-
BH 38 mb• <E> 1GeV• Landau-Lifshitz: ee → ee e+e-
LL 19 mb• <E> 0.15GeV• Breit-Wheeler: e+e-
BW 1 mb 104 e+e- /BX Maximum PT = 0.1 GeV/c
W. Morse May 15, 2007 28
Bethe-Heitler Pairs
e → e e+e-
oy
ox
oe
oBH
ee
NNN
oy
ox
oeBHee N
N
N
oy
ox
oeee N
E
E
For left and right detectors separately: N+/xy and N-/xy.
W. Morse May 15, 2007 29
Vertical offset
0
50
100
150
200
-200 -100 0 100 200
offset/2 (nm)
ener
gy
in g
amm
as (
MT
eV)
0
5
10
gammas
pairs
E BeamCal (TeV)
W. Morse May 15, 2007 30
Vertical Offset
0
5
10
15
20
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
offset/2 (nm)
Lu
min
osi
ty (
10^
33 c
m^
-2/s
)
0
0.05
0.1
Lum
R
R (10-6)
W. Morse May 15, 2007 31
Bunch Height
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
3 5 7 9 11
Bunch height (nm)
Energ
y in g
amma
s (MT
eV)
0
4
8
12
16
gammas
pairs
0
2
46
8
10
1214
16
18
3 5 7 9 11
Bunch height (nm)
Lum
inos
ity (1
0^33
cm^-
2/s)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Lum
R
W. Morse May 15, 2007 32
Bunch Length
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
150 200 250 300 350 400
Bunch Length (um)
gam
ma e
nerg
y (MT
eV)
0
5
10
15
20
25
gammas
pairs
0
2
46
8
10
1214
16
18
150 200 250 300 350 400
Bunch length (um)
Lum
(10^
33 cm
^-2/s
)0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Lum
R
W. Morse May 15, 2007 33
Forward Calorimeters
• LumiCal – forward Bhabhas for precision integrated luminosity measurement
• BeamCal – beam-strahlung pairs for instantaneous luminosity
• GamCal - beam-strahlung gammas for instantaneous luminosity
W. Morse May 15, 2007 34
International FCAL R&D Coll.
• W. Lohmann (DESY Zeuthen) spokesman• W. Morse (BNL) beam diagnostics
(BeamCal/GamCal) coordinator• B. Pawlik (Cracow) simulations
coordinator• W. Lange (DESY) sensors coordinator• TBD electronics coordinator• W. Wierba (Cracow) LumiCal laser
alignment coordinator
W. Morse May 15, 2007 35
U.S. Forward (SiD)
• W. Morse (BNL): Coordinator• G. Haller, A. Abusleme, M. Breidenbach, D.
Freytag (SLAC): BeamCal readout design• Z. Li (BNL): BeamCal radiation damage issues• B. Parker (BNL): machine interface issues• M. Zeller, G. Atoian, V. Issakov, A. Poblaguev
(Yale): GamCal design• Y. Nosochkov (SLAC): Extraction line issues• U. Nauenberg (Colorado): SUSY studies
W. Morse May 15, 2007 36
BeamCal
• .003 < < .02 rad3.5m from IR
• Measure the 104 beam-strahlung e+e- pairs/BX for beam diagnostics
• 2-10MGy/year
• Beam diagnostics and hermeticity for SUSY searches.
W. Morse May 15, 2007 38
GamCal Detector
180m from IR 10-4 X0 to convert beam-strahlung gammas into
e+e- pairs• Converter could be gas jet or a thin solid
converter• Magnet to separate pairs from beam electrons! 3 1010 beamstrahlung gammas (2 GeV) 2 1010 beam electrons (0.2 TeV)• Evaluate the effect of beam electrons going
through conveter
W. Morse May 15, 2007 40
GamCal Backgrounds
Gammas
1.E+04
1.E+05
1.E+06
1.E+07
1.E+08
1.E+09
-2 -1 0 1 2
log(E)
dN/d
log(
E)
Beamst
Brem
1
10
100
1000
-2 -1 0 1 2
log(E)
dN/d
log(
E) Delta Rays
Beamst e
W. Morse May 15, 2007 41
ZeeZ vs. eZ eZee
• Electron carries virtual gammas
• Landau Lifshitz conversion of virtual gammas
2
11.1ln
12
minb
c
d
dN
W. Morse May 15, 2007 43
Production Compared to ee
p eep 10 mbp N 0.5 mb in Δ resonance
regionp N 0.1 mb E > 4GeV
• ep e N 10-3 mb
• Thus ep e N is negligible
W. Morse May 15, 2007 46
Feed-back with Luminosity Detectors
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06
Intra-train y + y’ IP feedback simulations
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
1
2
3x 10
34
Bunch #
Lu
min
os
ity
/ c
m-2s
-1
y position FB:
restore collisions
within 100 bunches1 seed:
post-BBA
+ GM
+ wakes
y position scan:
optimise signal
in pair monitor
y angle scan
OPTIMAL
LUMINOSITY
W. Morse May 15, 2007 47
Conclusions
• We have designs for beam-strahlung pair and gamma detectors.
• Studies, simulations continuing.• Ratio of the beamstrahlung pairs
(BeamCal) to gammas (GamCal) is largely proportional to the instantaneous luminosity.
• Use feedback to bring 5nm beams into collision at maximum luminosity
W. Morse May 15, 2007 49
ILC Timeline
• Reference Design 2007
• Engineering Design 2009
• Site selection, LHC Physics results, International Funding Agreement 2010
• Construction Starts 2011
• Construction Ends 2018
• First Run 2019
W. Morse May 15, 2007 52
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900
Bunch width (nm)
En
erg
y in
gam
mas
(M
TeV
)O
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
gammas
pairs