w at er- lv iu d s20 nch go , a ndj s p erqu if com …figure 12. map showing water-level changes in...

1
Figure 12. Map showing water-level changes in the Jasper aquifer, greater Houston area, Texas, 2001–02. OPEN-FILE REPORT 02–134 Water-level changes, Jasper aquifer, 2001–02—SHEET 12 OF 15 Coplin, L.S., and Lanning-Rush, Jennifer, 2002, Water-level altitudes 2002 and water-level changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper aquifers and compaction 1973–2001 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas 94 o 30' 29 o 45' 94 o 45' 30 o 95 o 30 o 15' 95 o 15' 30 o 30' 30 o 45' 95 o 30' 95 o 45' 96 o 30 o 45' 30 o 30' 30 o 15' 29 o 45' 30 o 29 o 30' 96 o 29 o 15' 95 o 45' 95 o 30' 95 o 15' 95 o 29 o 15' 94 o 45' 29 o 30' 94 o 30' 0 5 10 15 20 MILES ROSENBERG RICHMOND RIVERSIDE HUNTSVILLE NEW WAVERLY NAVASOTA MONTGOMERY CONROE KATY DAYTON LIBERTY BAYTOWN LA PORTE PASADENA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ALTA LOMA LA MARQUE GALVESTON HOUSTON Loop 336 Lake WEST RIVER SAN JACINTO FORK Creek Creek Lake LAKE CONROE Caney Creek WEST FORK SAN JACINTO RIVER Spring Creek LAKE HOUSTON SHELDON RESERVOIR Buffalo Bayou TRINITY RIVER Cedar Bayou BRAZOS RIVER BRAZOS RIVER BRAZOS RIVER Clear Creek CLEAR LAKE TRINITY BAY GALVESTON BAY EAST BAY WEST BAY GULF OF MEXICO SAN BERNARD RIVER LIVINGSTON LAKE WALKER COUNTY GRIMES COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY SAN JACINTO COUNTY BRAZOS COUNTY HARRIS COUNTY AUSTIN COUNTY FORT BEND COUNTY LIBERTY CHAMBERS COUNTY COUNTY BRAZORIA COUNTY GALVESTON COUNTY WHARTON COUNTY WALLER COUNTY FM 1696 I–45 State 19 State 30 State State 90 105 FM 1375 State 105 US 59 US 290 I–45 US 59 FM 1960 US 90 State 6 US 90 I–10 I–10 I–610 I–610 US 90A I–10 State 36 US 90A US 59 I–45 I–45 State 6 US 190 State 150 FM 1725 State 6 FM 1960 State 321 US 90 State 146 US 59 Sam Houston Parkway Sam Houston Parkway State Loop 8 State 288 State 36 State 36 FM 360 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital data, 1:100,000 Universal Transverse Mercator projection Zone 15 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754–4733 E-mail: [email protected] WATER-LEVEL ALTITUDES 2002 AND WATER-LEVEL CHANGES IN THE CHICOT, EVANGELINE, AND JASPER AQUIFERS AND COMPACTION 1973–2001 IN THE CHICOT AND EVANGELINE AQUIFERS, HOUSTON-GALVESTON REGION, TEXAS By L.S. Coplin and Jennifer Lanning-Rush 2002 IN COOPERATION WITH THE HARRIS-GALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT, CITY OF HOUSTON, AND FORT BEND SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT Boundary of study area EXPLANATION Updip limit of Jasper aquifer (University of Texas, Bureau of Economic Geology, 1968, 1974) Measured water-level change at wells between 2001 and 2002–Number indicates magnitude of change Decline of more than 50 feet Decline of 21 to 50 feet Decline of 11 to 20 feet Decline of 1 to 10 feet No change Rise of 1 to 10 feet 23 1 14 4 51 1 1 8 10 7 5 9 6 4 2 1 1 12 16 3 15 45 32 19 37 16 43 14 62 51 26 11 23 11 12 25 26 14 31 31 16 26 22 28 36 25 21 43 24 20 25 18 30 13 58 39 21 24 57 38 4

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: W AT ER- LV IU D S20 NCH GO , A NDJ S P ERQU IF COM …Figure 12. Map showing water-level changes in the Jasper aquifer, greater Houston area, Texas, 2001–02. OPEN-FILE REPORT 02–134

Figure 12. Map showing water-level changes in the Jasper aquifer, greaterHouston area, Texas, 2001–02.

OPEN-FILE REPORT 02–134Water-level changes, Jasper aquifer, 2001–02—SHEET 12 OF 15

Coplin, L.S., and Lanning-Rush, Jennifer, 2002, Water-level altitudes 2002 and water-level changes in the Chicot, Evangeline,and Jasper aquifers and compaction 1973–2001 in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galveston region, Texas

94o30'

29o45'

94o45'

30o

95o

30o15'

95o15'

30o30'

30o45'

95o30'

95o45'

96o

30o45'

30o30'

30o15'

29o45'

30o

29o30'

96o

29o15'

95o45'

95o30'

95o15'

95o

29o15'94o45'

29o30'

94o30'

0 5 10 15 20 MILES

ROSENBERG

RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

HUNTSVILLE

NEW WAVERLY

NAVASOTA MONTGOMERYCONROE

KATY

DAYTON

LIBERTY

BAYTOWN

LA PORTEPASADENA

JOHNSON SPACE CENTER

ALTA LOMA

LA MARQUE

GALVESTON

HOUSTON

Loop 336

Lake

WEST

RIVER

SAN

JACIN

TO

FORK

Creek

CreekLake

LAK

EC

ON

ROE

Caney

Creek

WEST FORK

SAN

JACIN

TO

RIVER

SpringCree

k

LAKE

HO

UST

ON

SHELDON RESERVOIR

Buffalo Bayou

TRINITY

RIVER

Cedar

Bayou

BRAZOSRIVER

BRAZOS

RIV

ER

BRAZOS

RIV

ER

Clear

Creek

CLEAR LAKE

TRIN

ITY

BAY

GALVESTO

N BAY

EAST BAY

WEST BAY

GULF OF M

EXICO

SAN

BERNARD

RIVER

LIVINGSTON

LAKE

WALKER COUNTY

GRIMES COUNTY

MONTGOMERY

COUNTY

SAN

JAC

INTO

CO

UN

TY

BRA

ZO

S CO

UN

TY

HARRIS

COUNTY

AU

STIN

CO

UN

TY

FORT BEND COUNTY

LIBERTYCHAMBERS COUNTY

COUNTY

BRAZORIA COUNTY

GALVESTON COUNTY

WH

ARTON

COUNTY

WA

LLER C

OU

NTY

FM 1696

I–45 State 1

9

State 30

Stat

e

State

90

105

FM 1375

State 105

US

59

US 290

I–45

US

59

FM 1960

US 90

Sta

te 6

US 90

I–10I–10

I–610

I–610

US 90A

I–10

State 36

US 90A

US 59

I–45

I–45

State 6

US190

State150

FM

1725

Sta

te 6

FM 1960

State 321

US 90

State 146

US 59

Sam Houston Parkway

Sam

Hou

ston

Par

kway

State Loop 8

State 288

State 36

Sta

te 3

6

FM 360

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital data, 1:100,000Universal Transverse Mercator projectionZone 15

For additional information write to:District Chief

U.S. Geological Survey8027 Exchange Dr.

Austin, TX 78754–4733E-mail: [email protected]

WATER-LEVEL ALTITUDES 2002 AND WATER-LEVEL CHANGES IN THE CHICOT, EVANGELINE,AND JASPER AQUIFERS AND COMPACTION 1973–2001 IN THE CHICOT AND EVANGELINE

AQUIFERS, HOUSTON-GALVESTON REGION, TEXASBy

L.S. Coplin and Jennifer Lanning-Rush2002

IN COOPERATION WITH THEHARRIS-GALVESTON COASTAL SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT,

CITY OF HOUSTON, ANDFORT BEND SUBSIDENCE DISTRICT

Boundary of study area

EXPLANATION

Updip limit of Jasper aquifer (University ofTexas, Bureau of Economic Geology, 1968,1974)

Measured water-level change at wellsbetween 2001 and 2002–Numberindicates magnitude of change

Decline of more than 50 feet

Decline of 21 to 50 feet

Decline of 11 to 20 feet

Decline of 1 to 10 feet

No change

Rise of 1 to 10 feet

23

1

14

4

51

1

1

8

10

7

5

9

6

4

2

1

1

12

16

3

15

45

32

19

37

16

43

14 62

51

26 11 23 11

12

25 26

14

31 31

16

26

22 28

36

25 21

43

24 20

25

18

30

13

58

39

21 24

57 38

4