vodafone group plc - trefispdfs.trefis.com/61c5230c-5005-4f00-ab85-a17952d915d2/db923cfd-… ·...
TRANSCRIPT
ATLAS ALPHA • THOUGHT LEADERSHIP • ACCESS • SERVICE
1 June 2016
Vodafone Group plc
BUY
Telecommunications
Dividend risk reducing
Paul Marsch Analyst
+44 20 3207 7857 [email protected]
Laura Janssens Analyst
+44 20 3465 2639 [email protected]
Julia Thannheiser Specialist Sales
+44 20 3465 2676 [email protected]
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
THE TEAM
Paul Marsch has been with Berenberg since 2009. He was previously head of telecoms
research at Morgan Stanley, where he was consistently very highly ranked. Paul has 20
years' experience in telecoms research, as well as having worked for five years in the
telecoms industry for Cable & Wireless.
Laura Janssens joined Berenberg in September 2011 and was previously head of global
telecoms research at UBS and head of European telecoms research at Merrill Lynch. She
has also worked at telecoms consultancy Analysys, and at BT. She has 17 years of
telecommunications experience. Laura has been a top-ranked individual analyst in the Extel
survey on several occasions.
Julia Thannheiser joined the Berenberg specialist sales desk in May 2013. Prior to this, she
spent over three years as a telecoms analyst at UBS. Julia holds a BSc from the University
of Maastricht and a MSc from Cass Business School.
For our disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act
(Wertpapierhandelsgesetz – WpHG) and our disclaimer please see the end of this
document.
Please note that the use of this research report is subject to the conditions and restrictions
set forth in the disclosures and the disclaimer at the end of this document.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
3
Table of contents
Dividend yield appeals on reducing risk 4
Investment thesis in pictures 6
Investment conclusion 7
Juicy dividends and reducing risk profile 7
Changes to estimates 10
Dividend drives valuation appeal 11
Price target unchanged 11
European mobile operating trends deep dive 14
Conclusion – European mobile service revenue trends encourage 27
Margin outlook shows scope for improvement 29
“Good” capex reflects success of project Spring 33
Indian spectrum risk? 38
Financials 40
Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act
(Wertpapierhandelsgesetz – WpHG) 43
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
Dividend yield appeals on reducing risk
● Dividend yield appeal: We continue to like Vodafone’s shares for their relatively attractive dividend yield and rapidly declining dividend risk. The outlook of modest single-digit dividend growth is underpinned by a return to stable low single-digit revenue growth, margin expansion, and falling capex that results in FCF growth averaging c18% over the next three years, and dividend cover rebuilding from c1.0x this year to 1.5x by FY19. The 5.3% dividend yield stands out relative to the peer group, and is the highest cash dividend yield of the “big five” European incumbents.
● Europe drives group service revenue improvement: Group organic service revenues continue to improve (Q4 growth of 1.8% yoy lfl, versus 1.4% in Q3). Our detailed assessment of European mobile service revenue trends shows a material improvement driven by improving ARPU trends rather than improving subscriber trends. Blended ARPUs are improving in most EU business units, with declines in postpaid ARPUs being offset by the ongoing significant mix shift from low-ARPU prepaid tariffs to higher-ARPU postpaid services. We see this mix shift as the single most significant evidence that growing demand for mobile data is being monetised. We believe there remains considerable further potential for growth in smartphone, 4G and data plan adoption which should continue to underpin modest European service revenue growth in the medium term.
● Good reasons for margins to expand: An estimated £900m of EBITDA headwinds in FY17 should be more than offset by structural margin benefits (faster-growing high-margin segments like AMAP and cable), operating leverage (as project Spring cost growth starts to slow) and efficiency gains (on direct costs, customer costs, and IT and technology costs). We expect group margins to expand by 210bp to 30.4% by FY19.
● Higher capex is good capex: Following higher capex guidance from management we have raised our cumulative three-year capex by £2.4bn to £20.7bn for FY17-19, with an average three-year capex/sales of 15.6%. Absolute capex will still fall by c20% in FY17. Increased capex will be spent on 4G densification and fibre backhaul in Europe, 4G expansion in AMAP, fibre and DOCSIS 3.1 upgrades in European wireline, and IT transformation. Target areas should benefit both revenues and opex. Despite this higher capex scenario, our FCF estimates for FY17-19 are almost unchanged.
1 June 2016
BUY
Current price
Price target
GBP 2.31
GBP 2.50
31/05/2016 London Close
Market cap (GBP m) 60,057 Reuters VOD.L Bloomberg VOD LN
Changes made in this note
Rating: Buy (no change) Price target: GBP 2.50 (no change)
Estimates changes 2017E 2018E 2019E
old ∆ % old ∆ % old ∆ %
Sales 41,309 5.1 42,349 4.6 43,254 4.2
Ebitda 12,039 4.9 12,578 4.1 13,022 5.1
EPS 4.53 10.9 5.56 6.7 6.41 22.1 Source: Berenberg estimates
Share data
Shares outstanding (m) 26,692 Enterprise value (GBP m) 92,807 Daily trading volume 42,900,000
Interactive model click here to explore
* there may be a delay for the new estimates to be
updated on the interactive model
Y/E 31/3., GBP m 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Sales 42,227 40,973 43,406 44,289 45,076 EBITDA 11,915 11,612 12,629 13,088 13,683
Operating Profit (adj.) 3,507 3,117 3,697 4,153 4,838
Net Income (adj.) 1,471 1,344 1,342 1,582 2,089
EPS (recurring) 5.55 5.04 5.03 5.93 7.83 DPS 11.22 11.45 11.68 11.91 12.15
Capex (accrued) -9,197 -8,599 -6,894 -6,834 -6,936
Spectrum Investment -443 -2,944 -2,570 -570 -341
FCF (company defined) 1,088 1,013 3,109 4,308 4,616
Net Debt 22,271 29,175 32,750 32,399 31,573
GBPEUR= 1.28 1.37 1.27 1.27 1.27 RatiosRatiosRatiosRatios PE (Adj.) 40.8 44.7 44.9 38.1 28.8
Dividend Yield 4.9% 5.1% 5.3% 5.4% 5.5%
EV/EBITDA (Berenberg adj.) 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.1 6.8
EV/OpFCF (Berenberg adj.) 14.5 15.8 13.1 14.1 13.2
FCFE Yield (normalised) 7.3% 6.2% 7.0% 7.2% 7.6% FCF Yield (Berenberg adj.) 6.0% 5.2% 5.8% 6.0% 6.3%
Capex/Sales 21.8% 21.0% 15.9% 15.4% 15.4% Source: Company data, Berenberg
Paul Marsch
Analyst
+44 20 3207 7857
Laura Janssens
Analyst
+44 20 3465 2639
Julia Thannheiser
Specialist Sales
+44 20 3465 2676
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
BUY
Investment thesis
1 June 2016 Reuters VOD.L
● We think operating trends at Vodafone will continue to improve,
driven by rising smartphone and 4G penetration, an improving
customer mix and a gradual move towards pricing stabilisation.
● Vodafone’s cash flow and returns, which have been depressed in
recent years, should recover strongly from FY17 onwards, as the
project Spring investment cycle comes to an end.
● Vodafone shares offer a relatively attractive dividend yield at c5%,
among the highest of its peer group. As cash flow recovers, the era
of the dividend being paid out of Verizon Wireless disposal
proceeds will end, and cash flow cover of the dividend will move
into positive territory, reducing the risk of a change in dividend
policy.
● Valuation is highly sensitive to smartphone and 4G penetration and
ARPU assumptions.
● We value Vodafone based on a DCF/SOTP valuation model.
Bloomberg VOD LN
Current price Price target
GBP 2.31 GBP 2.50 Market cap (GBP m) 60,057
31/05/2016 London Close EV (GBP m) 92,807
Trading volume 42,900,00
0
Free float 100.0%
Non-institutional shareholders Share performance
None > 1% High 52 weeks GBP 2.55
Low 52 weeks GBP 2.00
Business description Performance relative to
Mobile network operator with operations in
Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia.
SXXP SXKP
1mth 4.2% 2.3%
3mth 1.5% 5.0%
12mth 5.1% 4.2%
Profit and loss summary
GBPm 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Revenues 42,227 40,973 43,406 44,289 45,076
EBITDA 11,915 11,612 12,629 13,088 13,683
EBITA - - - - -
EBIT 3,507 3,117 3,697 4,153 4,838
Associates contribution -63 44 90 98 110
Net interest -1,290 -1,375 -1,393 -1,462 -1,429
Tax -569 -175 -633 -739 -925
Minorities -177 -223 -330 -370 -395
Net income adj. 1,471 1,344 1,342 1,582 2,089
EPS reported 5.55 5.04 5.03 5.93 7.83
EPS adjusted 5.55 5.04 5.03 5.93 7.83
Year end shares 26,615 26,692 26,692 26,692 26,692
Average shares 26,615 26,692 26,692 26,692 26,692
DPS 11.22 11.45 11.68 11.91 12.15
Cash flow summary
GBPm 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
EBITDA 11,915 11,612 12,629 13,088 13,683
Capex -8,435 -8,910 -7,694 -6,834 -6,936
Dividends to subsidiaries -22 -156 -156 -144 -133
Other -1,375 -507 -626 -705 -926
FCF to the firm 2,083 2,039 4,153 5,404 5,688
Net interest -995 -1,026 -1,045 -1,096 -1,072
FCFE 1,088 1,013 3,109 4,308 4,616
Acquisitions, disposals -7,184 -7 -1,087 -300 -300
Other investment CF 895 -1,968 0 0 0
Dividends paid -2,927 -2,998 -3,027 -3,087 -3,149
Buybacks, issuance 0 0 0 0 0
Change in net debt -8,571 -6,904 -3,575 351 826
Net debt 22,271 29,175 32,750 32,399 31,573
FCF per share 4.09 3.80 11.65 16.14 17.29
Growth and margins
2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Revenue growth 10.1% -3.0% 5.9% 2.0% 1.8%
EBITDA growth 7.5% -2.5% 8.8% 3.6% 4.5%
EBIT growth -18.6% -11.1% 18.6% 12.3% 16.5%
EPS adj growth -27.8% -9.2% -0.2% 17.9% 32.0%
FCF growth -74.0% -6.9% 206.9% 38.6% 7.1%
EBITDA margin 28.2% 28.3% 29.1% 29.6% 30.4%
EBIT margin 8.3% 7.6% 8.5% 9.4% 10.7%
Net income margin 3.5% 3.3% 3.1% 3.6% 4.6%
FCF margin 2.6% 2.5% 7.2% 9.7% 10.2%
Key ratios
2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Net debt / equity 32.9% 43.3% 49.9% 50.5% 50.1%
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3
Avg cost of debt 5.5% 4.0% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4%
Tax rate 29.4% 15.1% -29.1% -28.5% -27.8%
Interest cover 9.2 8.4 9.1 9.0 9.6
Payout ratio 203.0% 226.6% 232.2% 201.0% 155.2%
ROCE 2.5% 2.8% 5.6% 7.3% 8.4%
Capex / sales 21.8% 21.0% 15.9% 15.4% 15.4%
Capex / depreciation 101.1% 104.3% 85.3% 75.7% 77.4%
Valuation metrics
2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
P / adjusted EPS 40.8 44.7 44.9 38.1 28.8
P / book value 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0
FCF yield 7.3% 6.2% 7.0% 7.2% 7.6%
Dividend yield 4.9% 5.1% 5.3% 5.4% 5.5%
EV / sales 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0
EV / EBITDA 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.1 6.8
EV / EBIT 23.5 28.6 25.1 22.3 18.9
EV / FCF 75.7 88.1 29.9 21.5 19.9
EV / cap. employed 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2
Key risks to our investment thesis
● FX is a key risk. Each 1% change in EUR versus GBP/INR/ZAR affects
EBITDA by €15m/€20m/€15m and FCF by €5m/€5m/€5m.
● The entry of Reliance Jio into the Indian market in 2016 may
undermine the performance of one of Vodafone’s key growth assets.
● Mobile data growth may exceed expectations, leaving capex above
expectations in the long term, or Vodafone may fail to profitably
monetise the growth in mobile data.
● Apple may decide to pursue a “soft-sim” service provider strategy.
Paul Marsch
Analyst
+44 20 3207 7857
Laura Janssens
Analyst
+44 20 3465 2639
Julia Thannheiser
Specialist Sales
+44 20 3465 2676
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
6
Vodafone Group plc – investment thesis in pictures
Figure 1: Peer group dividend yields
Vodafone shares offer an above-average dividend yield, and the
highest cash dividend yield of “the big five”
Figure 2: Dividend cover under our new estimates
Dividends are covered by recurring FCF from FY17; group
dividend policy is to pay a rising dividend
Source: Berenberg estimates. Note: * Telefónica dividend includes c35c
scrip, without which the cash dividend yield would be 4.3%
Source: Company data, Berenberg estimates
Figure 3: Group organic service revenues
Organic service revenue trends are firmly back in growth
territory, with future headwinds likely to continue to reduce
Figure 4: Mobile data monetisation
The prepaid-to-postpaid customer mix-shift remains the most
compelling evidence of mobile data monetisation, in our view
Source: Berenberg estimates Source: Berenberg estimates
Figure 5: EBITDA growth despite several headwinds
Despite several headwinds, EBITDA should be capable of 3-6%
organic growth in FY17, with “underlying” growth even stronger
Figure 6: New capex is “good” capex
New capex guidance adds £2.4bn to our FY17-19 cumulative
capex estimate, but capex will still decline significantly in FY17
Source: Company data Source: Berenberg estimates
0.0
%
3.0
%
3.3
%
3.6
%
3.6
% 4.2
% 4.7
%
4.7
%
4.8
%
5.2
%
5.3
%
5.4
% 6.3
%
6.4
%
6.5
%
8.1
%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
TI (
Ord
s)
TD
C
DT
E
KP
N BT
OR
A
SCM
N
Avg
.
TI (
sav
s)
TLS
N
VO
D
PR
OX
TE
FD
Te
le2
TN
OR
TE
F*
Dividend yield (2016E)
4,183
1,088 1,013
3,109
4,3084,616
5,129
0.8
0.4 0.3
1.0
1.4 1.5 1.6
0.65
0.22
(0.64)
0.18
1.211.36 1.49
(4.0)
(3.0)
(2.0)
(1.0)
0.0
1.0
2.0
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Div
iden
d c
over
x
FCF
£m
Vodafone FCF and dividend cover profileFree casflow (£m incl Spring - lhs)Div cover (ex spectrum - rhs)Div cover (with specturm - rhs)
-3.8%
-5.2% -5.1%-4.0% -4.2%
-1.5%-0.4%
0.1%0.8% 1.2% 1.4%
2.5%
-6.0%-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Group organic service revenue growth (% yoy)
Total group organic service revenues
have improved - but why?
49 55 61 67 7180 87 95
108
132146
162177
212229
252
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
25
75
125
175
225
275
325
375
Vodafone Europe mobile data traffic growth
Quarterly data traffic
(Petabytes - lhs)
Growth yoy (rhs)
14.8
15.3
14.4
13.5
14
14.5
15
15.5
16
16.5
FY16
reported
EBITDA
FX/ladder FY16
rebased
Roaming,
content,
handset fin.
MVNO
Project
Srping
technology
costs
FY16
restated
Underlying
growth
FY17
guidance
Vodafone Group FY17
Guidance EBITDA (€bn) drivers
+0.5 -0.6
-0.3
+1.3 - 1.8 +15.7 - 16.2
+3% - 6%
yoy
52926313
9197 8599
6272 5886 6125
622 948 811
13.9%
16.5%
21.8%21.0%
15.9% 15.4% 15.4%
14.7% 14.4% 14.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E
Ca
pe
x/s
ale
s %
Ca
pe
x £
m
Vodafone capex - the old and the new
New capex £m
Capex (old) £m
Capex/sales (new) %
Capex/sales (old) %
6902 6848 6950
Project Spring capex
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
7
Vodafone Group plc – investment conclusion
20-second summary
We still like the Vodafone equity story of gradually recovering top-line growth, margin expansion and falling capex, with FCF bouncing back to cover the dividend this year (before spectrum costs), and allowing for growth in the dividend. Our detailed analysis of Vodafone’s European mobile operations shows encouraging trends across most business units. Revenue headwinds should continue to reduce, and there are good structural reasons why margins can increase. Higher capex is “good” capex, in our view, targeted at both revenue and cost opportunities. Our price target is unchanged at £2.50, with increased EBITDA estimates offset by increased capex estimates and higher net debt due to revised India spectrum assumptions.
Juicy dividends and reducing risk profile
Dividend yield beats all major peersDividend yield beats all major peersDividend yield beats all major peersDividend yield beats all major peers
We primarily like Vodafone for its relatively attractive dividend yield of 5.3% which compares favourably with the sector, and even more favourably with major peers. Against the sector, Vodafone’s 5.3% dividend yield is 13% higher than the peer group. Against major peers, Vodafone’s dividend is 10% above Telecom Italia Savers (Telecom Italia Ords currently do not pay a dividend), 25% above Orange, 40% above BT Group, and 60% above Deutsche Telekom. Of the major peer, only Telefónica has a higher dividend yield for 2016, and that is only when the 35c scrip is included. If we exclude the scrip and just focus on the cash dividend of 40c, then Vodafone’s dividend yield is 23% above that of Telefónica.
Dividend risk to fall as cover rebuildsDividend risk to fall as cover rebuildsDividend risk to fall as cover rebuildsDividend risk to fall as cover rebuilds
Vodafone’s dividend risk is set to fall as the cash flow cover of the dividend rebuilds over the next 2-3 years. In the current year, FY17, the Vodafone dividend will be just covered by our projected FCF of £3.1bn (see Figure 7). Beyond FY17, we expect FCF to grow strongly, enabling dividend cover to improve to c1.5x by FY19.
Figure 7: Dividend cover under our new estimates
Dividends are covered by FCF (guidance definition), but uncovered in FY17
once anticipated spectrum costs are included in FCF; group dividend policy is
to pay a rising dividend
Source: Company data
4,183
1,088 1,013
3,109
4,3084,616
5,129
0.8
0.4 0.3
1.0
1.4 1.5 1.6
0.65
0.22
(0.64)
0.18
1.211.36 1.49
(4.0)
(3.0)
(2.0)
(1.0)
0.0
1.0
2.0
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Div
ide
nd
co
ver
x
FC
F £
m
Vodafone FCF and dividend cover profileFree casflow (£m incl Spring - lhs)Div cover (ex spectrum - rhs)Div cover (with specturm - rhs)
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
8
18181818% FCF CAGR for FY17% FCF CAGR for FY17% FCF CAGR for FY17% FCF CAGR for FY17----20202020
This growth in FCF, from £3.1bn in FY17 to £4.6bn by FY19 and £5.1bn by FY20, is driven by:
● a steady ongoing recovery in group revenues (we expect c2.5% revenue CAGR over FY16-19);
● EBITDA which grows faster than revenues (we expect c5% EBITDA CAGR for FY16-19) with margin expansion driven by structural factors (AMAP, cable), operating leverage, and efficiency gains; and
● falling capex after the completion of project Spring (we project capex/sales to fall from 21% in FY16 to 15.9% in FY17 and then on to 15.4% in FY19).
Group FCF should then grow from £3.1bn in FY17 to £4.3bn, £4.6bn, and £5.1bn over FY18/19/20 respectively. That results in an 18% CAGR in FCF for FY17-20.
Revenue headwinds shRevenue headwinds shRevenue headwinds shRevenue headwinds should reverse in coming quartersould reverse in coming quartersould reverse in coming quartersould reverse in coming quarters
FCF growth starts with the top line continuing to grow. Our ambitions for the top line feel conservative, with a CAGR of only c1.7% for group organic revenue growth (FY16-19), which is a blend of Europe (with a revenue CAGR of 1.2%) and AMAP with a revenue CAGR of 2.8% pa.
Our estimates incorporate a level of conservatism regarding the outlook in India to reflect the prospects of pressure from the Reliance Jio launch, and in the Netherlands, where service revenues and ARPU have been under pressure. More positively, Vodafone should see reduced headwinds from regulatory drags (eg mobile termination rates, or MTRs, roaming), from out-of-bundle revenue pressures, and from MVNO revenue pressures.
Finally, as we illustrate later in this report with our deep dive into European mobile service revenue trends, the strong ongoing growth in data usage, and smartphone and 4G adoption should underpin a continued mix shift from low-ARPU, high-churn prepaid users to higher-ARPU, lower-churning postpaid users, signifying the most visible evidence of mobile data monetisation, in our view.
Good reasons to expect margins to expandGood reasons to expect margins to expandGood reasons to expect margins to expandGood reasons to expect margins to expand
We think there are several good reasons for margins to expand in the mid-term. Structural margin expansion should be underpinned by the faster growth of higher-margin divisions (eg AMAP) and business units (eg German and Spanish cable). Operating leverage benefits should start to accrue as the step-up in project Spring opex starts to level out.
These factors should be accompanied by initiatives to improve gross margin through intense focus on direct costs from third-parties (mostly the local incumbent operators), control of customer acquisition costs (lengthening handset upgrade cycles, reduced channel commissions, increased use of online and on-device channels), and improved technology efficiency (zero-based costing, IT transformation, centralised procurement, among others). As a result, we think EBITDA can grow faster than revenues over the next three years, with a CAGR of 3.9% pa.
Blocked consolidation is better than the wrong consolidationBlocked consolidation is better than the wrong consolidationBlocked consolidation is better than the wrong consolidationBlocked consolidation is better than the wrong consolidation
Hopes of material further in-market consolidation in mobile have been undermined by the EC’s opposition to the UK merger of Three and O2. We think the readacross to Italy is cautious, although we recognise that some observers believe the Italy merger of Three and Wind is sufficiently different to that of Three and O2 in the UK and so may stand a better chance of being approved.
The scenario of remedy-light 4-to-3 in-market mobile consolidation was never one that we strongly believed in. We also thought that deals would be allowed, but with strong remedies which mostly nullified the benefits of consolidation. We also worried that there was the risk that remedies overshot the mark, with the risk of unintended consequences to the detriment of all players in the markets looking to consolidate.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
9
Figure 8: Peer group dividend yields
Vodafone shares offer an above average dividend yield, and the highest cash
dividend yield of “the big five” (Deutsche Telekom, BT Group, Telefónica,
Telecom Italia, and Vodafone)
Source: Company data.
Note: * Telefónica dividend includes c35c scrip, without which the cash dividend yield would be
4.3%
Figure 9: Our Vodafone capex estimates and capex/sales
Vodafone’s new capex guidance adds £2.4bn to our FY17-19 cumulative capex
estimate, but capex will still decline significantly in FY17
Source: Company data
Following the blocking of deals in Denmark and the UK we therefore have mixed feelings as to the implications for Vodafone. Yes, it would have been good to see real in-market consolidation leading to market repair, even if that was accompanied by higher capex.
But maybe there is also a way that blocked deals can be good for the sector. In Denmark prices have risen c20% since the Telia/Telenor deal was blocked. We would not be surprised to see prices increase further in the UK given Three’s need to invest in more spectrum and capacity.
Italy too seems ripe for price increases should the Wind/Three deal be blocked given the low margins and poor 4G spectrum position at Three Italia, and low bottom-line cash flows of Wind.
Prices in other markets are going up (eg Vodafone has raised prices in Germany, the UK and Spain recently), so the backdrop at present seems to be supportive of selective price increases.
0.0
%
3.0
%
3.3
%
3.6
%
3.6
% 4.2
% 4.7
%
4.7
%
4.8
%
5.2
%
5.3
%
5.4
% 6.3
%
6.4
%
6.5
%
8.1
%0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
TI
(Ord
s)
TD
C
DT
E
KP
N BT
OR
A
SCM
N
Avg
.
TI
(sa
vs)
TLS
N
VO
D
PR
OX
TE
FD
Te
le2
TN
OR
TE
F*
Dividend yield (2016E)
52926313
9197 8599
6272 5886 6125
630 962 825
13.9%
16.5%
21.8%21.0%
15.9% 15.4% 15.4%
14.7% 14.4% 14.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E
Ca
pe
x/sa
les
%
Ca
pe
x £
m
Vodafone capex - the old and the new
New capex £m
Capex (old) £m
Capex/sales (new) %
Capex/sales (old) %
6902 6848 6950
Project Spring capex
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
10
Changes to estimates
Figure 10: Changes to estimates
Source: Berenberg estimates
Note: FY16/17 consensus is from the company, FY18 consensus is based on Bloomberg
Estimate changes reflect capex guidance, and currencyEstimate changes reflect capex guidance, and currencyEstimate changes reflect capex guidance, and currencyEstimate changes reflect capex guidance, and currency
Our organic (ie ex-FX) revenue and EBITDA estimates are subject to very minor changes, with revenues trimmed modestly (c1%) to reflect the likely loss of MVNO revenues from United Internet in coming years, and the Q4 trajectory of revenues at Vodacom, and in Greece, Spain and the Netherlands. Our group EBITDA estimates are modestly trimmed excluding FX effects, and are increased by c4-5% including the benefits of revised FX expectations.
The major change to our estimates is at the capex level where we reflect management’s new guidance for capex/sales to settle in the mid-teens percent of revenues. Our capex estimates are increased by 12-14%. Our group FCF estimates are almost modestly trimmed
Post Q4 2016 results
Vodafone Group
Estimate Changes 2017E 2018E 2019E Rationale
Group Revenues £mln
New £mln 43,406 44,289 45,076
Old 41,309 42,349 43,254
Change % (ex FX) (0.7%) (1.2%) (1.5%)
Change % 5.1% 4.6% 4.2%
Consensus 43,146 43,317 43,882
We are above (below) consensus by.. 0.6% 2.2% 2.7%
Group EBITDA £mln
New £mln 12,629 13,088 13,683
Old 12,039 12,578 13,022
Change % (ex FX) (1.1%) (1.8%) (0.9%)
Change % 4.9% 4.1% 5.1%
Consensus 12,542 12,767 13,379
We are above (below) consensus by.. 0.7% 2.5% 2.3%
Group Operating Profit £mln
New £mln 3,697 4,153 4,838
Old 3,695 4,111 4,449
Change % (ex FX) (5.9%) (4.6%) 2.4%
Change % 0.1% 1.0% 8.7%
Consensus 3,772 3,718 4,109
We are above (below) consensus by.. (2.0%) 11.7% 17.7%
Group Capex £mln
New £mln 6,894 6,834 6,936
Old 6,072 6,086 6,125
Change % 13.5% 12.3% 13.2%
Consensus 6,653 7,045 6,790
We are above (below) consensus by.. 3.6% (3.0%) 2.1%
Group FCF
New £mln 3,109 4,308 4,616
Old 3,177 4,199 4,617
Change % (ex FX) (10.0%) (3.8%) (6.3%)
Change % (2.2%) 2.6% (0.0%)
Consensus 3,400 na na
We are above (below) consensus by.. nm nm nm
Group Net Debt (reported) £mln
New £mln 32,750 32,399 31,573
Old 30,893 30,350 29,322
Change % (ex FX) 6.8% 8.4% 10.4%
Change % 6.0% 6.8% 7.7%
Consensus 31,260 28,687 28,624
We are above (below) consensus by.. 4.8% 12.9% 10.3%
Our net debt estimates are changed to reflect our increased
expectations for specturm spend in India in FY16. We now assume
£2bn spend, from £500m before.
Increased estimates relate almost solely to changes to our FX
assumptions.
Increased estimates relate almost solely to changes to our FX
assumptions. Ex-FX, our near-term estimates are reduced to reflect a
higher D&A trajectory. Our mid-term esimates are increased to reflect
higher expectations for associates.
Changes to our FX assumptions almost offset reductions to our
organic FCF which arise from our increased capex estimates.
Our capex estimates are increased to reflect management's latest
guidance for capex/sales in the mid-teens. Our estimates imply c16%
capex/sales in FY17 fading to 14%-15% further out.
Very modestly trimming organic estimates to reflect the likely loss of
German MVNO revenues from United Internet, and reveue trajectory
in Vodacom, Greece, Spain and Netherlands. Changes to our FX
assumptions result in an uplift to estimates.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
11
for FY17, and increased by c2% in FY18 and unchanged for FY19 with currency benefits offsetting higher capex.
Our group net debt estimates are increased by 6-8% due to a higher year-end FY16 net debt figure, and an upward revision to our Indian spectrum cost assumption for FY17 (we now assume Vodafone will spend £2bn, from £500m before).
We are above the preWe are above the preWe are above the preWe are above the pre----Q4 consensus on revenues, EBITDA and net debt Q4 consensus on revenues, EBITDA and net debt Q4 consensus on revenues, EBITDA and net debt Q4 consensus on revenues, EBITDA and net debt
Figure 10 details changes to key estimates, and also shows where we stand versus pre-Q4 consensus. We are 2-3% above consensus at the revenue level, 2-3% above on EBITDA, and significantly above consensus at the adjusted operating profit level, which may reflect our revised trajectory for the contribution from associates.
We seem to be c10% above consensus on net debt in the mid-term, although it is difficult to know why. Spectrum assumptions are the most likely culprit, although it is possible that some analysts are including the Verizon loan note as an asset in their net debt calculation. We exclude it, as it is essentially offset by the £2.75bn mandatory convert issued by Vodafone, the liability of which is not included in group net debt.
Dividend drives valuation appeal
On our new estimates, Vodafone’s shares trade at a modest discount to peers on most of the metrics we use. The 7.4x EBITDA multiple for 2016 falls to a 4% discount by 2018. On EV/OpFCF the shares trade at a small discount in 2016, but move to a small premium versus peers in 2017 and 2018. On normalised FCFF yield the shares trade at a 1-5% discount, while on normalised FCFE yield they trade at a more interesting 4-10% discount. P/E makes no sense for this stock given the high proportion of legacy spectrum amortisation and PPA in the numbers.
The degree of undervaluation of Vodafone’s shares has reduced through the year as they have outperformed major peers. For example, they have outperformed the sector (SXXP) by 5% on a same currency basis, and by 7.5% on a local currency basis. As discussed earlier, the dividend is their key attraction.
Price target unchanged
We have left our price target unchanged at £2.50, as illustrated in Figure 12, which sums up the following key components of the valuation:
● £91.64bn aggregate value of the consolidated business units;
● £4.64bn value of associates Safaricom, Indus Towers, and Vodafone Australia Holdings (note the negative equity value!);
● £6.3bn value of tax assets based on the discounted value of savings to cash taxes derived from Vodafone’s tax management (note that our business unit DCFs use normalised cash taxes);
● £30.8bn of net debt adjusted for the £2.7bn convertible, the £3.5bn Verizon loan note, and £1.2bn of minority net debt adjustments;
Figure 11: Vodafone versus peer valuation comparables
Vodafone’s shares trade at modest discounts on EV/EBITDA, and FCF yields, and offer a relatively
attractive dividend yield
Source: Berenberg estimates
Vodafone
Relative Valuation Comparables 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018
Vodafone 7.4 7.1 6.8 13.1 14.1 13.2 5.8% 6.0% 6.3%
Sector (average) 7.5 7.4 7.1 13.6 13.2 12.7 5.5% 5.9% 6.2%
Premium/(discount) vs simple -1.6% -3.7% -3.8% -3.8% 6.9% 4.0% -5.0% -1.4% -0.9%
Vodafone
Relative Valuation Comparables 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018 2016 2017 2018
Vodafone 7.0% 7.2% 7.6% 44.9 38.1 28.8 5.3% 5.4% 5.5%
Sector (average) 6.3% 6.8% 7.3% 16.1 15.4 14.1 4.7% 4.9% 5.2%
Premium/(discount) vs simple -9.7% -5.6% -4.1% 178.8% 147.2% 104.5% -10.5% -8.5% -4.8%
Adjusted EV/EBITDA Normalised FCFF Yield
Div Yield
Adjusted EV/OpFCF
Normalised FCFE Yield Adjusted PE
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
12
DCF/SOTP valuation
Figure 12: DCP/SOTP valuation
Source: Berenberg estimates
Revenue EBITDA EV/EBITD OpFCF EV/OpFCF EV
Valuation by Segment £m Code Method 2019E 2019E Multiple 2019E Multiple £m Ownership Vodafone % of AV Minority
Germany GE DCF 8,740 2,797 8.1 1,398 16.3 22,753 100.0% 22,753 22.2% 0
o/w KDG GEK DCF 2,031 977 9.3 611 14.8 9,072 76.0% 6,895 6.7% (2,177)
Italy IT DCF 4,847 1,793 7.7 1,066 12.9 13,737 100.0% 13,737 13.4% 0
UK UK DCF 6,496 1,462 7.6 552 20.1 11,092 100.0% 11,092 10.8% 0
Spain SP DCF 4,031 1,108 8.2 504 18.0 9,053 100.0% 9,053 8.8% 0
Netherlands NL DCF 1,433 487 7.9 272 14.2 3,854 100.0% 3,854 3.8% 0
Portugal PO DCF 763 282 8.3 168 14.0 2,351 100.0% 2,351 2.3% 0
Greece GR DCF 670 194 4.8 94 10.0 941 100.0% 941 0.9% 0
Other Europe OE DCF 2,287 709 7.8 366 15.1 5,519 100.0% 5,519 5.4% 0
India IN DCF 4,979 1,519 5.9 772 11.6 8,916 100.0% 8,916 8.7% 0
Vodacom VO DCF 4,222 1,816 7.3 1,224 10.8 13,279 65.0% 8,631 8.4% (4,648)
Turkey TK DCF 3,005 661 5.2 210 16.3 3,428 100.0% 3,428 3.3% 0
Egypt EG DCF 1,177 530 6.3 353 9.5 3,338 54.9% 1,832 1.8% (1,505)
Other AMAP OA DCF 1,500 375 7.2 165 16.3 2,682 100.0% 2,682 2.6% 0
Common function CF DCF 1,160 (50) 66.5 (398) 8.3 (3,323) 94.7% (3,147) (3.1%) 176
Segment totals 45,309 13,683 7.1 6,747 14.5 97,619 93.9% 91,643 96.0% (8,154)
Associates (proportionate value) Method
EBITDA
2017 Multiple EV £m
Net (Debt)
£m
Ownership
%
Equity
Value
Safaricom Multiple 628 7.4 4,672 145 40.0% 1,927
Indus Towers Multiple 323 10.3 3,311 (150) 42.0% 3,161
Vodafone Australia Holdings Multiple 187 6.5 1,216 (1,660) 50.0% (445)
Total Associate Investments 4,643
Value of tax asset
BV of
DTA £m
% that
benefits tax Years
Capitalise
at £m
Tax asset 22,382 60.0% 30 7.1% 6,312
Total proportionate asset value
Segments + associates + investments + tax assets 102,598
51
Adjustments For Group Net Debt and Other Liabilities £m
Group Net debt (@ p/t date) (32,750)
Add mandatory convertible (issued with a view to being covered by VZ loan note proceeds) (2,754)
Offset with Verizon loan note US$ 5,000 FX 1.43 3,487
Adjust for Minorities Share of Net Debt Net debt % Stake Value £m
KDG 3,091 76.0% 742
Vodacom 1,040 65.0% 364
Voda Egypt 0 54.9% 0
Vodafone Qatar 143 38.3% 88
Total Minorities Debt Adjustments to Group EV 4,274 27.9% 1,194
Other Obligations & Liabilities Per 20F Probability £m
Vod Esar (Hutch Cap Gain Tax) $2bn (1,295) 30.0% (389)
Vod Essar (Hutch Cap Gain - Fine) $2bn? (1,295) 30.0% (389) Include?Other 0 0.0% 0
Total Other Obligations & Liabilities (777) Y
Adjustments to EV for leakage Cashflows £m
Spectrum payments (5,514)
Disposals of PP&E 2,331 Include?
Total EV Adjustments (4,189) Y
Total Net Debt & other liabilities (35,789)
Equity Value 66,809
Equity Value per share £
Number of shares 000's 26,692
Equity Value Per Share 2.50
Proportionate adjustment
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
13
● £0.8bn of other obligations and potential liabilities (which reflects our 30% probability that Vodafone ends up paying the Indian capital gains tax demand);
● £5.5bn NPV of future spectrum costs – note that this excludes this year’s Indian spectrum auction which is already captured in our year-end net debt; and
● £2.3bn NPV of PP&E disposals, which reflects the fact that Vodafone typically sees a FCF benefit of c£100m-150m each year from PP&E disposals.
Note: For readers interested in how our valuation of Vodafone India compares with IPO expectations, note that our India valuation is split in our DCF/SoTP model between the valuation of the Indian mobile operation in the consolidated segments section of Figure 12 (EV of £8.92bn), and the valuation of Vodafone India’s 42% stake in Indus Towers in the associates section of Figure 12 (valuation of £3.2bn for Vodafone’s 42% stake).
In sum, our Vodafone valuation of £2.50 assumes a valuation for Vodafone India, in total, of £12.1bn ($17.3bn, or INR1,160bn or INR1.2 lakh crore).
Vodafone growth and margin valuation sensVodafone growth and margin valuation sensVodafone growth and margin valuation sensVodafone growth and margin valuation sensiiiitivitytivitytivitytivity
We show in Figure 13 the sensitivity of our valuation to variations of revenue growth and EBITDA margin. Each 1ppt variation in mid-term revenue growth would add c22p to our £2.50 price target, while each 1ppt variation in mid-term margin would add 17p. A combination of 1ppt faster revenue growth, with 1ppt higher margin outcome in the mid-term, would therefore add c40p to our valuation.
Figure 13: Valuation sensitivity to incremental revenue growth and margin
If Vodafone can grow 1ppt faster than we expect, and deliver 1ppt higher margins than we expect, the
price target would be £2.90
Source: Berenberg estimates
Deltas 0.50%
0.50% 2.50 (1.0%) (0.5%) 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5%
(1.0%) 2.13 2.13 2.33 2.43 2.53 2.53
(0.5%) 2.21 2.31 2.41 2.41 2.62 2.73
0.0% 2.29 2.29 2.50 2.61 2.72 2.72
0.5% 2.37 2.48 2.58 2.58 2.81 2.92
1.0% 2.45 2.45 2.67 2.78 2.90 2.90
Price target (£) as a function of revenue growth and margin
Revenue growth variation versus base case
EBITDA
margin
vaiation
versus base
case
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
14
European mobile operating trends deep dive
In this section we look in detail at the reasons behind the improvement in Vodafone’s organic service revenue trends, with a focus on European mobile service revenues, which still make up c50% of group service revenues.
We start with group organic service revenue trends, then we strip out mobile termination rate effects (which distort the underlying trend), wireline trends, and AMAP revenue trends, and are left with European mobile service revenue trends.
We conclude the following.
● Vodafone’s organic group service revenue trends are clearly improving.
● This is not just caused by fading regulatory drags (eg MTRs).
● Nor is it just caused by wireline growth, or AMAP (emerging markets) growth.
● Improving European mobile service revenue trends (ex-MTRs) have been a key contributor to improving group trends.
● The improvement in Europe remains driven more by ARPU than by SIM growth.
● This is despite the material continued ongoing decline in postpaid mobile ARPU (ex-MTRs) trends in its Europe business units.
● The decline in postpaid ARPUs is at least improving.
● Its effect is being offset by a continued significant mix shift from low-ARPU prepaid to higher-ARPU postpaid services across Europe.
● The outlook is encouraging, with significant scope for further growth in smartphone adoption, data plan adoption, 4G adoption, individual data usage, further mix shift from prepaid to postpaid, and selective price inflation.
Why focus on European mobile?
In this section we peel back the onion of Vodafone’s group organic service revenue trend in order to more closely scrutinise the European mobile business. Why? Well, this business remains the largest segment of Vodafone’s service revenues, generating c50% of group service revenues in FY16.
Figure 14: Vodafone group service revenue segmentation
European mobile accounts for c50% of group service revenues in
FY16, with AMAP mobile accounting for 30%, and wireline service
revenues making up c21%
Figure 15: Vodafone service revenue segmentation by type
Alternatively, residential/consumer accounts for 66% of group
service revenues, enterprise 33.9% and other (eg MVNOs) 6%
Source: Company data, Berenberg calculations Source: Company data, Berenberg calculations
Europe
mobile,
49.4%
Europe
wireline ,
18.2%AMAP
wireline ,
2.4%
AMAP
mobile,
30.0%
Vodafone group service revenue:
Segmentatation by region (Q4/FY16)
Residential/
consumer,
66.0%
Other
(MVNO/part
ner), 6.0%
Enterprise,
33.9%
Vodafone group service revenue:
Segmentatation by customer type (Q4/FY16)
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
15
Figure 16: Vodafone group and European organic service revenue trends
We peel back the onion of growth, starting with group organic service revenue growth, then
incrementally stripping out regulatory drags (MTRs), wireline revenues, and AMAP, to home in on
European mobile service revenue trends (ex-MTRs)
Source: Company reports
-3.8%
-5.2% -5.1%-4.0% -4.2%
-1.5%-0.4%
0.1%0.8% 1.2% 1.4%
2.5%
-6.0%-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Group organic service revenue growth (% yoy)
Total group organic service revenues
have improved - but why?
-0.8%
-2.4% -2.7% -2.8% -2.9%
-0.9%
0.2%0.9%
1.4%1.8% 2.1%
3.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Group (ex-MTR) service revenue growth (% yoy)
Stripping out MTRs shows a strong move
back to +ve underlying growth - but why?
-0.6%
-2.5% -2.9% -3.0% -3.4%
-1.1% -1.1%-0.5%
0.8%1.3%
1.9%2.8%
-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%
-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%
3.0%4.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Group mobile service revenues growth (% yoy) ex MTRs
Group underlying mobile service
revenue trends resumed an improving
trend in Q4 after a pause in Q3.
-5.7%
-7.5%-8.0% -8.0%
-7.5%
-5.2%
-3.5%-2.9%
-2.2% -2.1%-1.6%
-0.8%
-10.0%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Europe underlying (ex-MTR) mobile service revenue growth…
Europe underlying mobile
service revenue trends
continued to improve
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
16
Also, it is the segment which has suffered the most severe headwinds over the last few years, and as those headwinds unwind we think it is important to understand exactly what role the European mobile business is playing in the improvement in group organic service revenue trends, and how Europe’s contribution to the group improvement is being driven. This may provide clues as to the resilience of the improving trend.
First, the good news: service revenue trends are improving
Figure 10 presents our first important point. There is a lot of data in Figure 16, but there is no need for readers to spend more than a few seconds perusing it. It is important to realise that the improving trend shown by Vodafone at the group service revenues level (in the top chart of Figure 16), is a function of several factors. Progressing down the figure, each chart strips out some of the key factors in order to home in on the specific contribution of European mobile at the bottom of the chart.
Group organic service revenue trends are impGroup organic service revenue trends are impGroup organic service revenue trends are impGroup organic service revenue trends are imprrrrovingovingovingoving
So, working down from the top of Figure 16, it is clear that, in organic terms, group service revenues have been improving nicely in the last nine quarters. However, some of this benefit is due to the fading drag of regulatory price cuts specifically to mobile termination rates (MTRs).
Even excluding MTR effects, group organic service revenue trends are improvingEven excluding MTR effects, group organic service revenue trends are improvingEven excluding MTR effects, group organic service revenue trends are improvingEven excluding MTR effects, group organic service revenue trends are improving
The second chart in Figure 16 strips out the benefit of the reducing MTR drag, so show that service revenues have still been improving, even without the MTR effect. However, the swing in service revenue performance is less once MTRs are stripped out; for example, at the headline level (including the benefit of MTR price cuts fading) group service revenues saw a 7.7pt reversal from Q2 2014 (-5.2% yoy) to Q4 2016 (+2.5% yoy).
If we exclude the MTR effect, then service revenues saw a 5.4ppt reversal in the trend from Q2 2014 (-2.4% yoy) to Q4 2016 (+3% yoy). However, this ex-MTR trend still includes the effect of Vodafone’s various wireline operations, mostly in Europe, but also in AMAP.
Excluding wireline and MTR effects, group service revenue trends are improvingExcluding wireline and MTR effects, group service revenue trends are improvingExcluding wireline and MTR effects, group service revenue trends are improvingExcluding wireline and MTR effects, group service revenue trends are improving
The next chart down in Figure 16 strips out wireline service revenues to focus just on mobile service revenue trends (excluding MTR benefits). It is clear from this chart that group mobile service revenue trends have shown improvement over the last seven quarters, reversing a 3.4% decline in Q1 2015 to growth of 2.8% in Q4 2016. This reversal in fortunes remains in part influenced by the continued strong growth in the AMAP region.
Finally, European mobile service revenues, exFinally, European mobile service revenues, exFinally, European mobile service revenues, exFinally, European mobile service revenues, ex----MTRs, are genuinely improvingMTRs, are genuinely improvingMTRs, are genuinely improvingMTRs, are genuinely improving
The next chart strips out the contribution from AMAP, so we are left with the growth trend in European mobile service revenues, excluding wireline, and MTR effects. From this chart it is clear that European mobile service revenues have improved their trend from a peak decline of 8% yoy in Q4 2014 (ie two years ago), to a decline of just -0.8% yoy in Q4 2016, due to more than just the unwinding of past regulatory pricing pressures. Something else is going on.
ARPU trends have been a bigger driver than subscriber trendsARPU trends have been a bigger driver than subscriber trendsARPU trends have been a bigger driver than subscriber trendsARPU trends have been a bigger driver than subscriber trends
In Figure 17 we break down the European organic mobile service revenue trend (ex-MTRs) into the two major components of volume (in this case, subscriber growth) and price (in this case, ARPU). Looking back at Vodafone’s historical KPI data, its European mobile subscriber base reached a peak of c139m back in Q3 FY12, since when it has declined in a reasonably consistent manner to the end-Q4 FY16 level of 121.4m.
Over the last 12 quarters the decline in the European subscriber base has improved from -5% in Q1 FY14, to -1.6% yoy in Q4 FY16, albeit improvement has been through the occasional setback (eg Q4 FY15 through Q1 FY16).
Even so, we can at least say that improvements in the pace of decline of the subscriber base have accounted for 1ppt of the 7.8ppt of European service revenue improvement since the trough in Q4 FY14. APRU trends have thus accounted for the bulk of the improvement in
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
17
Figure 17: European mobile service revenue components
The improvement in European mobile service revenues is the result of an improving pace of decline
in European organic ARPU (ex-MTR average revenue per user), rather than subscriber growth
Source: Berenberg figures (calculated from company data)
European service revenues over that period, as illustrated in Figure 17, which shows that European mobile ARPU improved from a decline of 5.6% yoy in Q4 FY14 to growth of 0.8% yoy in Q4 FY16, accounting for c90% of the recovery in European organic service revenues over that period.
Most of Vodafone’s Most of Vodafone’s Most of Vodafone’s Most of Vodafone’s European European European European BUsBUsBUsBUs havhavhavhave improvede improvede improvede improved mobile servimobile servimobile servimobile service revenue trendsce revenue trendsce revenue trendsce revenue trends
What if we break down the European service revenue performance into individual markets? We do this in Figure 18, which shows that the majority of Vodafone’s European markets have seen an ongoing improvement in organic service revenue trends (excluding MTR drag unwind).
Germany shows perhaps the most interesting trend, since the business unit is Vodafone’s largest, accounting for 20% of group service revenues and 30% of European service revenues as of Q4 FY16, and shows a 6.2ppt reversal in its service revenue trend, excluding MTRs, since the trough in Q3 FY14.
Beyond Germany though, there is a mix of trends, even across a broad picture of ongoing improvement. Certain markets (eg Italy, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Ireland, Greece) have seen quite radical reversals from significant double-digit annual declines, to recover growth or close to growth. Romania stands out as having maintained organic mobile service revenue growth (ex-MTRs) for the last 12 quarters, with growth accelerating in recent quarters to 8% yoy.
Spain, Spain, Spain, Spain, the the the the UK and UK and UK and UK and the the the the NetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlands stand out for differing reasonsstand out for differing reasonsstand out for differing reasonsstand out for differing reasons
Three of Vodafone’s major markets stand out, albeit for differing reasons. Spain continues to struggle with meaningful mid-single-digit declines in service revenues. We calculate that, ex-MTR effects, Spain saw organic mobile service revenues decline 6.4% yoy in Q4 FY16.
This was still a major improvement on the prior quarter, and represented a 6.4ppt improvement from the peak decline of Q2 FY14. The improvement in the yoy decline from Q3 into Q4 is notable, we think, given the drag on Spanish service revenues from handset financing, which serves to reduce the handset subsidy recovery from ARPU.
-5.0%
-4.4%
-3.7%
-2.6% -2.5% -2.7% -2.5%
-3.2%-3.7% -3.4%
-3.1%
-1.6%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Europe average subscriber growth (% yoy)
Improving subscriber growth in Europe has been a driver of recent mobile
service revenue growth improvements.
-0.7%
-3.3%
-4.5%-5.6% -5.2%
-2.6%
-1.1%
0.3%
1.5% 1.4% 1.5%0.8%
-6.0%-5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Implied Europe ARPU change (organic, ex-MTRs, % yoy)
...but an improving pace of ARPU decline in recent quarters has been the key swing factor
behind the improvement in European organic ex-MTR mobile service revenues.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
18
Figure 18: Vodafone Europe mobile service revenue trends improve
Vodafone has seen improving mobile service revenue trends (ex-MTRs) across most of its European
business units; the UK and the Netherlands buck the trend
Source: Berenberg figures (calculated from company data)
-1.8% -3.2%-5.7% -5.6% -5.5%
-3.6%-1.5% -3.0% -1.9% -2.6% -1.5%
0.5%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16Germany (~12%/18%)
-10.3%-13.9% -14.4% -18.2% -17.2% -11.7% -9.6% -6.3% -3.2% -3.0%
0.1% 1.6%
-20.0%
0.0%
20.0% Italy (~8%/12%)
-9.6%-12.8% -11.5% -9.8%
-12.7% -11.7% -11.1%-9.3% -9.5%
-6.8%-9.2%
-6.4%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%Spain (~6%/9%)
1.3% 1.0% 1.0%5.0%
2.0%
7.6% 9.1% 10.0%6.3% 4.5% 5.6%
8.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%Romania(~1%/2%)
-9.1% -11.7% -11.2%-6.6% -6.9% -4.5%
-1.7% -2.2%
0.3%
-0.5% -2.1% -0.4%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%Greece (~1%/2%)
-4.9%-10.6% -12.9% -13.8% -11.8%
-3.8% -2.3%
3.7% 1.3% 3.0% 2.7% 5.7%
-20.0%
0.0%
20.0%Czech Republic (~1%/2%)
-8.8% -8.3% -6.2%-11.6%
-7.9% -9.8% -10.5% -9.4% -7.3% -4.7% -3.2%
0.2%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%Portugal (~2%/3%)
-1.4% -1.0% -2.1%-5.3% -3.8%
-1.3%-3.8%
-9.2%-3.2%
-1.1%
0.7% 0.7%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0% Ireland (~2%/3%)
-2.6% -2.5% -3.2%-1.4%
-0.5% -0.3%
2.0%1.1% 0.9%
-0.2% -0.7%-1.6%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%UK (~12%/18%)
-4.2% -6.1% -6.9% -6.6%-3.7%
-0.6%
1.5% 2.5%
-0.6%
0.0%
-1.6%-5.8%-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%Netherlands (~3%/5%)
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
19
Figure 19: Blended ARPU trends (ex-MTRs) by major market (% yoy)
Group organic blended APRU improvement reflects improving ARPU trends in most markets,
notably Italy, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK
Source: Company reports
-8.1%-12.2% -13.1%
-16.2%-13.2%
-4.3%
0.0%4.8% 5.6%
2.2%5.3% 5.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0% Italy
-3.1% -3.4% -4.5% -3.9% -3.2% -2.2%
0.0% 0.0%
7.0% 5.3% 5.9% 7.2%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
UK
8.4% 7.0%
2.3%
-3.2% -4.5% -3.2%-1.3%
0.2%2.2% 1.5% 1.5% 1.9%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15Germany
7.1%2.5% 1.4%
-0.5%-6.0% -6.7% -7.8% -9.6%
-6.1% -3.9% -6.2% -5.4%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%Spain
-7.0%-5.2%
-1.3%-3.3%
1.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% 1.7% 1.6% 2.7% 4.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Portugal
-3.4% -5.1% -6.6%
4.4% 6.3%10.1% 11.8% 11.4%
2.2% 0.4% 0.3%3.1%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%Romania
-5.3% -6.0% -4.4% -4.8%-0.9%
1.9% 2.0%4.5%
-0.4%
0.8%
-0.8%-4.1%-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
Netherlands
-15.5%-18.8% -20.0%
-17.1%-13.1% -10.5%
-5.6% -6.0% -7.0% -6.0%-12.8% -12.6%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
Greece
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
20
As this effect (we estimate a drag of c3-4ppt in Q4 FY16) annualises out of the comparison through FY17, there should be, all else being equal, further improvements in the Spanish mobile service revenue trend.
The UK and the Netherlands business units strike a cautious tone with their recent mobile service revenue trends. In both markets, the trend has taken a turn for the worse, with the UK seeing a reversal from growth (2% yoy at the recent peak) to a decline of 1.6% yoy in Q4 FY16.
In the Netherlands, service revenues have likewise see a reversal from growth of 2.5% at the recent peak to a decline of 5.8% yoy in Q4 FY16. Following on from a protracted period of mobile service revenue declines, it seems that both business units could sustain only a few quarters of growth before reverting to a declining trend. So what is going on?
UK growth numbers do not add up, we blame credits related to billing problemsUK growth numbers do not add up, we blame credits related to billing problemsUK growth numbers do not add up, we blame credits related to billing problemsUK growth numbers do not add up, we blame credits related to billing problems
The UK mobile service revenue trends do not seem to reconcile to the trends in the price and volume components of service revenues. For example, according to blended ARPU figures published by Vodafone, UK ARPUs increased by 6.9% yoy in Q4, while the average subscriber base decline by 4.4%, suggesting that mobile service revenues should have shown growth of 2.2% (1.069 x 0.956 = 1.022, or 2.2% growth yoy).
In its reportage on the quarter, Vodafone cited the repercussions arising from difficulties with its billing system migration process during the quarter, although the clearest evidence of that is in the very weak contract net adds (1k) in the quarter, as consumer churn stepped up by 1.1ppt yoy to 18.9%.
Management also pointed to the impact of 08XX regulation. However, we believe that the disconnect between our calculation of how fast UK mobile service revenues should have grown in the quarter and the pace of decline reported by Vodafone relates to credits granted to customers related to the billing system problems experienced in the quarter, which we infer must be excluded from the UK mobile ARPU calculation.
Netherlands mobile service revenue trends appear genuinely weakerNetherlands mobile service revenue trends appear genuinely weakerNetherlands mobile service revenue trends appear genuinely weakerNetherlands mobile service revenue trends appear genuinely weaker
In the Netherlands, the problem seems to be primarily driven by weakening ARPUs, with both blended ARPU and postpaid ARPU taking a turn for the worse in recent quarters, and worsening further into Q4.
In the Netherlands, mobile service revenues declined 5.8% yoy in Q4, with blended ARPU falling 4.1%, and postpaid ARPU falling 6.8%, with management citing increased convergence price pressure as the culprit for worsening trends. To drive the point home, management reiterated that the merger deal with Liberty Global’s Ziggo is happening at the right time.
Blended ARPU trends are encouraging across most business units
As we observed for European mobile service revenues, the improving picture is evident if we look just at blended ARPU trends too (see Figure 19). Again, we have stripped out the benefit derived from the lessening MTR drag in recent quarters. Five of Vodafone’s eight main European markets saw yoy growth in blended ARPU in Q4, while five business units (a different five) saw an improving trend in blended ARPU (either improving growth or an improving pace of decline) in the quarter.
DutchDutchDutchDutch ARPUARPUARPUARPU trends are to blame for worsening service revenuestrends are to blame for worsening service revenuestrends are to blame for worsening service revenuestrends are to blame for worsening service revenues
The Netherlands stand out yet again, with blended ARPU trends taking a turn for the worse in Q4, declining 4.1% yoy, worsening from a 0.8% decline in Q3. The weakening trend in blended ARPU therefore explains the majority of the worsening mobile service revenue trend for Vodafone in the Netherlands.
Greece ARPU decline remains stubborn, but offset by customer base growthGreece ARPU decline remains stubborn, but offset by customer base growthGreece ARPU decline remains stubborn, but offset by customer base growthGreece ARPU decline remains stubborn, but offset by customer base growth
Blended ARPU trends in Greece also stand out due to their stubborn double-digit pace of decline, with the company blaming weak macro conditions. The Greek market has also seen aggressive prepaid mobile data promotions somewhat reminiscent of the Italian market in 2014, with 1GB of free data available on a 4GB top-up for c€4.40.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
21
Figure 20: Postpaid ARPU trends by major European market (% yoy)
In some key markets (like Italy, Spain and Portugal) postpaid ARPUs continue to fall significantly,
diluting any benefit from the prepaid-to-postpaid mix shift
Source: Company reports
-1.3% -0.9%-1.8%
-4.2%-3.1% -3.5% -3.9%
-5.6%-6.3% -7.0% -6.1%
-4.2%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16
Germany
-6.6% -5.7% -5.9% -5.6% -5.2%-3.5%
-0.4%
0.4%
-0.2%
-3.0%-4.4%
-2.8%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0% UK
-2.3%-4.3% -4.5% -5.0%
-8.8%-10.5%
-13.7% -15.0% -14.1%-11.3% -10.9% -10.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%Spain
-7.3%-11.0% -11.2%
-14.7%-17.5%
-14.8% -14.3% -13.5% -13.5% -14.9%-18.0%
-15.3%-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%Italy
-8.3%-11.2% -12.0%
-10.3% -9.7%-7.7%
-4.2% -5.2% -6.2% -6.7% -7.4%
-3.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%Greece
-5.8%-9.0%
-7.1%
-11.8% -12.1%-15.4% -14.5% -13.8% -12.9%
-10.8% -10.9%-7.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%Portugal
2.4%0.1%
-2.1%
6.5%4.2%
8.4%11.4% 13.1%
3.6% 2.6% 1.7% 2.2%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0% Romania
-8.0% -8.3% -7.3% -7.7%
-4.4%-2.7% -2.1%
0.6%
-3.6%
-1.2%-2.7%
-6.8%-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0% Netherlands
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
22
This has stimulated extremely strong data usage growth (Greek data volumes were up 132% yoy in FY16). Vodafone managed to increase its customer market share in Greece by 2ppt, to 35% during the year, with most of its share gain taken from Wind, and a little from Cosmote. The resulting strong customer growth at Vodafone Greece almost negated the impact from weaker ARPUs, with mobile service revenues (ex-MTRs) almost stable in the quarter – and as the company points out in its press release, total service revenues (including MTR unwind) scraping into positive growth territory.
Figure 21: Prepaid-to-postpaid mix shift
In the last two years the postpaid share of Vodafone’s European
base has increased by 5.8ppt to c50%, with a clear acceleration
of the shift over that timeframe
Figure 22: Postpaid subscribers as percentage of total
The prepaid-to-postpaid customer mix shift has occurred in most
of Vodafone’s European markets, underpinning blended ARPU
and mobile service revenue trends at the business unit level
Source: Company reports Source: Company reports
Figure 23: Prepaid/postpaid mix shift accelerating
Vodafone’s European portfolio encompasses a diverse range of
markets from mostly prepaid (eg Italy and Greece) to mostly
postpaid (eg Spain and the Netherlands)
Figure 24: Prepaid/postpaid ARPUs versus mix shift
Markets like Germany, the UK, the Netherland, and Greece,
where postpaid ARPU is several times higher than prepaid ARPU,
should benefit from the mix shift as long as postpaid ARPUs do
not decline too rapidly
Source: Company reports Source: Company reports
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
Q2
FY
09
Q4
FY
09
Q2
FY
10
Q4
FY
10
Q2
FY
11
Q4
FY
11
Q2
FY
12
Q4
FY
12
Q2
FY
13
Q4
FY
13
Q2
FY
14
Q4
FY
14
Q2
FY
15
Q4
FY
15
Q2
FY
16
Q4
FY
16
The mix-shift from prepaid to postpaid
continues, albeit at a slowing pace,
-4.1%
-1.4%
0.5% 0.6%
3.3%
5.0%5.7% 5.8% 6.4% 7.0% 7.1% 7.5% 8.0%
16.4%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Gre
ece
Alb
an
ia
Ita
ly
Ro
ma
nia
Ma
lta
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Hu
ng
ary
Eu
rop
e A
vg
.
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic
UK
Ire
lan
d
Ge
rma
ny
Sp
ain
Po
rtu
ga
l
4%
19%21%
28%
39%41%
50% 50%
55%60%
67% 67%
77% 78%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Alb
an
ia
Ita
ly
Ma
lta
Gre
ece
Po
rtu
ga
l
Ro
ma
nia
Ire
lan
d
Eu
rop
e A
vg.
Ge
rma
ny
Hu
ng
ary
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic UK
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Sp
ain
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
-4%-3%-2%-1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9%
Po
stp
aid
/Pre
pa
id A
RP
U r
ati
o
1 year change in postpaid
subscribers as % of base
European postpaid/prepaid ARPU
vs 1-year change in postpaid mix (%)
UK
GR
IT
PT
RO
GE
NL
SP
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
23
Elsewhere, ARPU trends are generally encouragingElsewhere, ARPU trends are generally encouragingElsewhere, ARPU trends are generally encouragingElsewhere, ARPU trends are generally encouraging
Italian ARPUs are growing at c5% yoy, UK ARPUs at c7% yoy, German ARPUs at c2% yoy, Portuguese ARPUs at c4% yoy, and Romanian ARPUs at c3% yoy. The pace of decline in Spanish ARPUs is improving, despite the drag from the change in handset financing, and should improve further as this drag fades.
Postpaid ARPU trends illustrate an important point
A little more colour can be gained by looking at postpaid mobile ARPUs in more detail. Figure 20 illustrates a key point about what is underpinning the mobile service revenue trends for Vodafone in Europe.
Of the eight major European markets that we detail, seven are experiencing ongoing declines in postpaid mobile ARPU (ex-MTRs). Only in Romania is postpaid ARPU actually growing. This may seem concerning but for two observations.
● First, in seven of the eight markets shown in Figure 20, the pace of decline in postpaid ARPUs is improving – only in the Netherlands is the postpaid ARPU trend getting worse.
● Second, despite the general picture of decline in postpaid ARPUs, the trend in blended ARPUs is still one of growth.
So, how can postpaid ARPUs be declining, yet blended ARPUs be growing?
The prepaidThe prepaidThe prepaidThe prepaid----totototo----postpaid mix shift continues, with a couple of exceptionspostpaid mix shift continues, with a couple of exceptionspostpaid mix shift continues, with a couple of exceptionspostpaid mix shift continues, with a couple of exceptions
The answer lies in the mix shift from prepaid to postpaid subscribers. We have pointed out before (see our report Upgrading to Buy on operating momentum, dated 28 April 2016) how the pace of mix shift from prepaid to postpaid customers has accelerated significantly in recent years.
Over the last two years the proportion of postpaid customers has increased by 5.8ppt to c50%. In the two prior years the proportion of postpaid customers increased by only 3.9ppt, and in the two years before that, by only 1.9ppt. This matters to blended ARPU because postpaid customers can spend up to 7-9x more than prepaid customers (see Figure 24).
The mix shift to postpaid is occurring in most of Vodafone’s European markets (see Figure 22), albeit at very differing paces. Portugal has seen the most radical change in prepaid/postpaid mix, with a 16.4ppt shift to postpaid in the last two years, leaving Portugal with 39% of the base now subscribing to a postpaid tariff. This swing reflects the rapid transition of the Portuguese market to converged tariff offers (wireline plus mobile plus TV) over the last 2-3 years, of which Vodafone has been a part.
Spain, Germany and the UK have also seen a significant shift in the prepaid/postpaid mix. At the other end of the scale, Greece and Albania have seen the prepaid share of subscribers increase, counter to the general trend across the rest of the European mobile industry.
Italy remains mostly a prepaid market (81% of Vodafone’s Italy base is prepaid), and has seen only a very minor shift towards postpaid in the last two years, albeit this situation reflects government tax policy which applies a tax to postpaid contracts, which in turn disincentivises consumers from taking a postpaid contract.
Romania stands out as a business unit which, while below average in terms of the proportion of postpaid in the mix (at 41%), has seen almost no change in the proportion of postpaid in the last two years. It also seems odd that Romania has seen significant growth in data volumes and increased smartphone take-up, two developments which would normally be associated with an increasing mix shift from prepaid to postpaid tariffs, yet the proportion of postpaid subscribers has remained almost unchanged over the last two years.
GGGGrowth in blended ARPUs is underpinrowth in blended ARPUs is underpinrowth in blended ARPUs is underpinrowth in blended ARPUs is underpinned by the prepaidned by the prepaidned by the prepaidned by the prepaid----totototo----postpaidpostpaidpostpaidpostpaid mix mix mix mix shiftshiftshiftshift
With one or two exceptions, the overall picture is one of an increasing proportion of customers taking a postpaid contract, resulting in a mix shift towards higher-ARPU services. While postpaid ARPUs are still falling, the mix shift has the effect of underpinning an improving trend, or in many case even growth, in blended ARPUs, as we illustrated earlier.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
24
Proof of mobile data monetisation remains elusive
Is mobile data monetisation another driver of the improvement in Vodafone’s mobile service revenue trends in Europe? We think so, albeit we would be the first to admit that the kind of direct first-hand evidence that we would prefer to see is not available.
However, the However, the However, the However, the mixmixmixmix shift to postpaid shift to postpaid shift to postpaid shift to postpaid ISISISIS the evidence of mobile data monetisationthe evidence of mobile data monetisationthe evidence of mobile data monetisationthe evidence of mobile data monetisation
However, to us, the strongest evidence of mobile data monetisation remains the mix shift from prepaid to postpaid mobile subscriptions. In short, we think consumers’ desire to have internet access on their mobile phones is driving the adoption of smartphones and the migration from 3G to 4G services.
Smartphones with 4G capability are more expensive devices, and therefore customers are more inclined to spread the cost of the device across a 12- or 24-month postpaid contract, instead of bearing the device’s cost upfront with a prepaid SIM tariff.
Figure 25: Europe and AMAP drive strong data volume growth
Note the stabilisation of the formerly slowing EU data volume
growth trend
Figure 26: European mobile data traffic growth
Growth continues to be strong, despite a slowing in recent
quarters
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Figure 27: Vodafone’s European smartphone growth
Growth continues, with increasing 4G take-up underpinning data
traffic growth
Figure 28: Individual smartphone data usage
Usage continues to show strong growth, with Germany standing
out as the laggard
Source: Company data, Berenberg calculations Source: Company data
110%
123%
110% 108%110%
94%97%
88%
78%
71%
64%68%
73%
81%84%
81% 79%
72%
66%62%
44%42%
53%
64%67%
70%
64%61%
57% 56%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
Q3/14 Q4/14 Q1/15 Q2/15 Q3/15 Q4/15 Q1/16 Q2/16 Q3/16 Q4/16
Vodafone group data volume growth (% yoy)
AMAP
Group
Europe
49 55 61 67 7180 87 95
108
132146
162177
212229
252
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
25
75
125
175
225
275
325
375
Vodafone Europe mobile data traffic growth
Quarterly data traffic
(Petabytes - lhs)
Growth yoy (rhs)
1.4
%
3.5
%
5.0
%
7.1
%
10
.0%
13
.0%
15
.6%
20
.0%
23
.0%
27
.5%
30
.9%
32
.5%
34
.2%
35
.3%
37
.0%
38
.7%
39
.3%
41
.7%
43
.2%
44
.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Vodafone Europe Smartphone and 4G take-up
as % of phone base
4G sim penetration
Smartphones with dataplan as % of phone sims
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
Smartphone data usage (MB/pcm)
in Vodafone's big 4 European markets
Spain
Italy
UK
Germany
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
25
Data volume Data volume Data volume Data volume growth remains very strong, although it is slowinggrowth remains very strong, although it is slowinggrowth remains very strong, although it is slowinggrowth remains very strong, although it is slowing
Mobile data on Vodafone’s group networks showed growth of 62% yoy in Q4 (see Figure 25). This is a blend of growth of 56% yoy in Europe and 71% yoy in AMAP. The growth trend is slowing, although that is to be expected given the rising take-up of smartphones and 4G.
Vodafone said that in Q4 its European network carried 252 petabytes of mobile data, which was up 56% yoy on Q4 FY15 (see Figure 25). Vodafone reports that smartphone adoption reached 58.1% across its European footprint in Q4 FY16, a healthy increase of 6.4ppt over Q4 FY15.
Smartphone dataSmartphone dataSmartphone dataSmartphone data plan adoption still offers plenty of scope for growthplan adoption still offers plenty of scope for growthplan adoption still offers plenty of scope for growthplan adoption still offers plenty of scope for growth
The proportion of smartphones with a data plan also continues to rise, although at a slower rate of 1.3ppt in FY16, to 76.1% (our estimate, which attempts to correct for an error in Vodafone’s reported data). This means that only 44.2% of mobile phones across Vodafone’s European footprint are smartphones with a data plan. This proportion is still increasing at a decent rate (eg by 5.5ppt yoy in Q4 FY16), but clearly offers considerable scope for further growth.
Individual smartphone data usage is also still growing very strongly in the majority of Vodafone’s major European markets (see Figure 28). Of the big four markets, Germany remains the laggard, with smartphone average usage of 764MB pcm in Q4, approximately half the level of smartphone data usage seen in the UK, Italy and Spain. Even in Germany, the pace of growth in smartphone monthly data usage shows no sign of letting up.
OOOOperator evidenceperator evidenceperator evidenceperator evidence of mobile data benefiting postpaid ARPU remains elusiveof mobile data benefiting postpaid ARPU remains elusiveof mobile data benefiting postpaid ARPU remains elusiveof mobile data benefiting postpaid ARPU remains elusive
While the evidence of mobile data usage growth remains robust, operators, Vodafone included, remain very reluctant to publish same-cohort comparisons of consumers’ ARPU before and after smartphone adoption or 4G migration. This suggests that the impact of mobile data tariffing on postpaid ARPU remains dilutive as higher-spending postpaid customers spin down to lower-priced postpaid data bundles. However, as we showed earlier, blended ARPUs are nevertheless still improving due to the mix shift from prepaid to postpaid, as lower-spending customers are increasingly adopting smartphones with 4G capability (see Figure 27). The trick for operators is therefore to manage the balance of this equation so as to underpin improving service revenue trends.
The recent emergence of “more-for-more” mobile data tariff bundles where operators are offering even more data (but at a slightly higher price) in several of Vodafone’s European markets is an effort to encourage customers to progress further up the data usage curve, with data volume increases offsetting the decline in price per megabyte of data.
Figure 29: Out-of-bundle revenues are an ever smaller part of the mix
OOB revenues continue to decline at a hefty rate
Figure 30: OOB revenues are less important
They are so small now as a percentage of total and European
revenues that their drag has materially eased
Source: Company data Source: Company data
-30.0
-25.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
-
5.0
FY
14
Q3
/1
4
Q4
/1
4
Q1
/1
5
Q2
/1
5
Q3
/1
5
Q4
/1
5
Q1
/1
6
Q2
/1
6
Q3
/1
6
Q4
/1
6
Vodafone: in-bundle vs out-of-bundle
revenue growth % yoy
Europe in-
bundle
Europe out-of-
bundle
39.7%
29.8%
27.7%
20.8%
45.2%
13.2%
32.5%
9.5%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0%
EU in-bundle as %
of EU service
revenues
EU out-of-bundle
as % of EU service
revenues
EU in bundle as %
of group service
revenues
EU out of bundle
as % of Group
service revenues
Q4/FY16
Q1/FY13
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
26
Figure 31: Churn is falling
Consumer postpaid and enterprise churn rates continue to fall
Figure 32: ‘Big four’ churn rates
Of “the big four” markets, only the UK’s churn has refused to fall
Source: Company data Source: Company data
Other headwinds are reducing too
We are encouraged by two other important trends which relate to our earlier observation regarding the ongoing mix shift from prepaid to postpaid mobile subscriptions.
● First, mobile “out-of-bundle” (OOB) revenues are now a much smaller proportion of revenues than they were a few years ago.
● Second, churn seems to be on a steady downward trend.
The drag from OOB revenues has reduced by twoThe drag from OOB revenues has reduced by twoThe drag from OOB revenues has reduced by twoThe drag from OOB revenues has reduced by two----thirds in recent yearsthirds in recent yearsthirds in recent yearsthirds in recent years
The decline in OOB mobile service revenues has been a major drag on total service revenues in recent years as data services have substituted for SMS messaging and voice calls. OOB mobile revenues are still declining in Europe at a mid-teens rate, as illustrated in Figure 29.
However, OOB revenues now make up only 13.2% of EU service revenues (see Figure 30), significantly down from almost 30% of European service revenues in Q1 FY13. That means that the drag from European OOB revenues has reduced from c7ppt as of Q1 FY13 to c2ppt as of Q4 FY16. The OOB drag on European service revenues should continue to fade as OOB shrinks further as a proportion of the service revenue pie.
Postpaid and enterprise churn rates are falling in EuropePostpaid and enterprise churn rates are falling in EuropePostpaid and enterprise churn rates are falling in EuropePostpaid and enterprise churn rates are falling in Europe
Churn rates are typically volatile quarter to quarter, as can be seen from the detailed country churn rates that Vodafone publishes. However, the long-term churn trend appears to be downwards, as illustrated by the chart displayed by Vodafone at its FY16 results (see Figure 31) which showed both consumer postpaid churn and enterprise churn rates declining in recent quarters.
Looking across the major business units in Europe, we note that three of the big four major business units have seen a steady decline in postpaid churn over the last few years (see Figure 32), with only the UK struggling to establish a meaningful downward trend in postpaid churn.
Other headwinds are easing too, according to VodafoneOther headwinds are easing too, according to VodafoneOther headwinds are easing too, according to VodafoneOther headwinds are easing too, according to Vodafone
Finally, Vodafone highlighted several other headwinds that are moderating and are likely to be less of a drag on group and European service revenues. These included mobile termination rates, MVNO wholesale revenues, and consumer prepaid revenues (12% of the European pie, and falling at c4.4% yoy in FY16).
Vodafone also appears to be outperforming in the enterprise segment, where its European service revenue base was approximately stable in FY16. While Vodafone’s enterprise revenues incorporate carrier revenues, which themselves can be quite volatile, the trend of
18.6%
17.9% 17.6%
17.0% 17.0% 16.7%
16.2% 16.4%
14.6%
16.4%
13.9%
15.4%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%
Q3
FY
15
Q4
FY
15
Q1
FY
16
Q2
FY
16
Q3
FY
16
Q4
FY
16
Vodafone Europe churn rates % pa
Consumer
postpaid
Enterprise
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
22.0%
24.0%
26.0%
28.0%
Q3
FY
13
Q4
FY
13
Q1
FY
14
Q2
FY
14
Q3
FY
14
Q4
FY
14
Q1
FY
15
Q2
FY
15
Q3
FY
15
Q4
FY
15
Q1
FY
16
Q2
FY
16
Q3
FY
16
Q4
FY
16
Vodafone Europe
Big 4 markets postpaid churn
Spain
Italy
UK(1)
Germany
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
27
stability compares favourably with more severe levels of enterprise revenue declines among peers (eg KPN, Telecom Italia, Deutsche Telekom).
Conclusion – European mobile service revenue trends encourage
European mobile service revenues remain the single-largest component of Vodafone group revenues, accounting for almost 50% of the group service revenue pie. In recent years this revenue segment has dragged the most on overall group revenue performance. The situation has rapidly improved in recent quarters such that European mobile service revenues are now almost back to stability. That improvement has been driven by a reversal in ARPU trends, from falling ARPUs 18-24 months ago to rising European mobile ARPU in recent quarters.
The growth in ARPU is being driven by the acceleration in the mix shift from prepaid to postpaid customers, which has been strong enough to offset the ongoing decline in postpaid mobile ARPUs. We see the mix shift as the single most significant evidence of the monetisation of the demand for mobile data.
The prospects for further European moThe prospects for further European moThe prospects for further European moThe prospects for further European mobile service revenue growth are goodbile service revenue growth are goodbile service revenue growth are goodbile service revenue growth are good
Looking forward, we think that Vodafone’s European mobile service revenue trends should be able to show further improvement for several reasons.
● Smartphone adoption will continue to increase from currently 58%. In Vodafone’s most advanced smartphone markets, the UK and the Netherlands, smartphone adoption is c70% and still growing.
● The proportion of mobile phones with a data plan will continue to grow from currently 44.2%. In its most advanced data markets (the UK, Spain), data plan adoption is at c55-65% of smartphones, and is still increasing.
● 4G adoption will continue to grow from currently 27.5%.
● Individual mobile data use will continue to grow strongly for the foreseeable future. In its most advanced major mobile data market of Spain, smartphone data usage is already at 1.5GB pcm and still grew at 57% yoy in Q4.
● The mix shift from prepaid to postpaid customers will continue from the current level of 50% postpaid subscribers. In its most advanced postpaid markets (Spain, the Netherlands) postpaid customers make up close to 80% of the base.
Figure 33: Vodafone group service revenue share (Q4 FY16)
Germany, UK and India account for almost half of group service
revenues, and Italy, Spain and Vodacom for another quarter
Source: Company data, Berenberg calculations
Note: “Other” includes Portugal, Romania, Greece, Hungary, the Czech Republic,
and Albania.
Germany,
20.2%
UK, 15.6%
India, 12.6%
Italy, 10.4%
Spain,
9.0%
Vodacom,
8.2%
Turkey, 4.6%
Other AMAP,
3.7%
Netherlands,
3.5%
Egypt, 3.2%
Other,
9.0%
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
28
● More-for-more data tariff plans will encourage customers to move up the spending curve as data volumes continue to grow strongly.
● Some markets will see price inflation as competitors, particularly smaller, capital-constrained pure-play mobile operators, seek to fund increased capex and spectrum costs through higher prices, especially in the new era of EC opposition to in-market consolidation.
The The The The improvement in improvement in improvement in improvement in group service revenuegroup service revenuegroup service revenuegroup service revenue growth will likely pause neargrowth will likely pause neargrowth will likely pause neargrowth will likely pause near----termtermtermterm
At its FY16 results, management clearly signalled that it expects group service revenue momentum to pause in Q1 FY17, and to look “broadly similar” to the 1.8% yoy organic growth seen in Q1 (ie below the headline 2.5% organic group service revenue growth in Q4 which benefited from the leap-year effect and changes to accounting for certain wireline products), citing several reasons.
● Reversal of the leap-year effect that benefited Q4 – this amounted to a benefit in Q1 of c0.3ppt.
● Increased drag from roaming due to new EC roaming rate rules – estimated impact is c0.3-0.4ppt with a more significant impact in the UK and Germany and a smaller drag in Spain and Italy.
● Vodacom (see Figure 33 for relevance) clearly signalled expectations for a slower pace of growth after a couple of quarters of very strong performance in South Africa (Q4 service revenue growth was 6.3% yoy).
● The unwinding of the carrier revenue boost seen in Q4, particularly in the UK (0.8ppt of benefit).
In addition, management cited several other risks to caution analysts from getting too carried away with the near-term organic service revenue outlook, including:
● continued nervousness over pricing in Italy where “below the line” price offers continue to be aggressive;
● increased subsidies by Deutsche Telekom in Germany; and
● the potential for competitive price adjustments in reaction to Reliance Jio’s launch in India.
Offsetting some of these concerns are other factors.
● UK billing credits (which we earlier identified as a drag on UK service revenues in the Q4) should start to fade, in our opinion, as Vodafone gets to grips with the billing problems that beset its UK operations in Q4.
● Regulatory drags in India should start to annualise in Q1, removing a 3ppt drag on Indian growth in Q4.
● Prices for certain tariffs should increase in Spain, Italy and Germany.
● Wireline and enterprise segments should show continued growth.
● In Spain, the handset financing drag on service revenues should fade.
In summary, consensus expectations for Q1 organic group service revenue trends should start to emerge around +1.8% yoy, similar to the underlying growth seen in Q4, with expectations for the UK, Germany, Italy and Vodacom to see slightly weaker trends, and with Spain and India likely to show better trends.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
29
Margin outlook shows scope for improvement
Our thoughts on Vodafone’s margin outlook have been positive for some time. In our view, the margin picture was somewhat more convincing than the top line, for five simple reasons.
● Mix effect 1: AMAP has higher margins that Europe, and is growing faster than Europe, thus creating a structural margin expansion driver.
● Mix effect 2: Cable operations in Germany and Spain have structurally higher margins than the rest of Europe, and are growing faster than the rest of Europe.
● Spring effect 1: In executing on project Spring, Vodafone has taken on c£500m of additional opex which will remain in its P&L. These Spring costs should stabilise, allowing for operating leverage to benefit margins.
● Declining churn rates: Falling churn is usually good for margins as operators can achieve the same net customer growth with a lower level of gross additions, and hence lower total subscriber acquisition costs (SAC). In addition, the lower churn allows for experimentation with lower SAC per addition (ie both a volume and a unit cost effect provide the margin benefit).
● Efficiency gains: In a group structure like that of Vodafone there is likely to be ongoing scope for efficiency gains and cost restructuring.
Vodafone’s CFO laid out in its recent Q4 results presentation a nice waterfall chart showing how guidance for organic group EBITDA growth of 3% to 6% in FY17 is to be achieved. We show that chart below in Figure 34. The EBITDA figures given are in million euros to reflect the company’s intended move to report in euros for FY17. The guidance range of €15.7bn-16.2bn translates to £12.4bn-12.8bn.
The chart reveals the significant underlying growth in EBITDA (ie €1.3bn-1.8bn) expected by management once various “headwinds” are adjusted for. These headwinds have become more visible as the end of FY16 approached, the primary ones are listed below.
● €225m roaming hit: The introduction of new EC rules regarding EU roaming rates (30 April 2016) is estimated to provide an incremental c€225m drag on FY17 EBITDA, excluding any offsetting benefits from elasticity.
● £100m (€130m) Spanish content costs: Incremental costs arising from the Mediapro sports rights agreement are expected to amount to c£100m in FY17, following a partial year’s impact of £50m in FY16 (seven months’ impact), and higher costs (after the Mediapro auction outcome) expected in FY17.
● €180m Spanish handset financing unwind: In FY16 Vodafone’s group EBITDA benefited from changes to the consumer financing of handsets in the amount of £180m as handset revenues were brought forward and recognised at the same time as handset expenses. EBITDA thus benefited. Service revenues, however, were affected since handset costs previously recovered through ARPU were now not being recovered through ARPU. In FY17, assuming similar volumes of gross adds to FY16, there should be no incremental benefit from the bringing forward of handset revenues, but the impact on service revenues will continue, thus there should be incremental pressure on the Spanish EBITDA in FY17 arising from lower service revenues relating to customers signed last year. We expect an impact of c£100m in FY16.
● £50m (€65m) MVNO impact: Vodafone will continue to see reduced exposure to the MVNO sector, with TalkTalk set to start migrating its UK MVNO over to O2 during FY17, and possible impacts from the ending of 4G MVNO talks with United Internet in Germany (which may increase its focus on the agreement with Telefónica Deutschland for incremental 4G sales). We think the impact in FY17 will be a few tens of millions in terms of EBITDA.
● €254m project Spring technology costs: Management has commented in the past that Spring will bring with it recurring opex totalling c£500m, of which £300m hit the P&L in FY16, and a further £200m (€254m) is expected to hit the P&L in FY17. Beyond this, Spring-related opex should stabilise, allowing for operational leverage from incremental revenue growth in future years.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
30
Figure 34: Vodafone group EBITDA guidance for FY17
Vodafone guides to 3-6% EBITDA growth despite €900m of expected headwinds in FY17, including
roaming, Spain content costs, handset financing unwind, and project Spring costs; without these
headwinds, its guidance would imply c10% yoy organic growth
Source: Company data
Management’s guidance thus implies a net €400m-900m increase in EBITDA in FY17, equating to a range of growth of 3-6% yoy. Were it not for those incremental cost items (several of which will fade from the comps as we progress into FY18) the increase in EBITDA would be more like €2.2bn-2.7bn, or 8.5-11.8% growth yoy. What drives that underlying improvement in EBITDA? On the call, management gave some useful insight into its expectations, citing an expectation that they can:
● drive up gross margin (through price increases, focus on driving down direct costs, wholesale arrangements with incumbents, among others);
● hold down customer costs, where customer acquisition and retention (A&R) costs have been trending lower as a percentage of revenues due to the push for a higher proportion of sales through own-branded channels including online/on-mobile channels, lengthening handset upgrade cycles, lower churn, and the move to value-based commission models in indirect channels;
● exploit improved cost economics of the network upgrades arising from project Spring (for example, Vodafone will lap the £500m opex/EBITDA hit from Spring in the near term, and then further out aims to reduce IT opex and capex as a percentage of revenue from 5.5% to 3.5-4% by year five through migration to the cloud;
● extract more synergies from the Ono acquisition – Vodafone raised the synergy target for Ono from €240m (already achieved) to €300m run rate by year four, through network savings, MVNO migration and FTTH capex avoidance, and savings from procurement and access to Vodafone group central functions; and
● implement other measures to improve operating leverage – these include increased use of centralised procurement and shared services, the introduction of “zero-based budgeting”, and the introduction of productivity targets for group operations.
As a result of the return to top-line growth, combined with these drivers of margin, Vodafone expects the number of its business units growing EBITDA faster than revenues over the next three years to increase to 24 (of 26), from 15 last year and 10 in FY12-15.
The margin expansion case already benefited EBITDA in FY16 which saw positive organic EBITDA growth in both H1 and H2 (see Figure 35). We acknowledge that group EBITDA benefited to the tune of c€180m (£140m) from Spanish handset financing in FY16, but FY15 benefited too (by c£100m), so the uplift in FY16 was not all incremental.
We estimate that group EBITDA would still have grown c1.5% yoy, adjusting for Spanish handset financing benefits.
14.8
15.3
14.4
13.5
14
14.5
15
15.5
16
16.5
FY16
reported
EBITDA
FX/ladder FY16
rebased
Roaming,
content,
handset fin.
MVNO
Project
Srping
technology
costs
FY16
restated
Underlying
growth
FY17
guidance
Vodafone Group FY17
Guidance EBITDA (€bn) drivers
+0.5 -0.6
-0.3
+1.3 - 1.8 +15.7 - 16.2
+3% - 6%
yoy
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
31
Figure 35: EBITDA – organic trends improving
In recent years the recovery in revenue has been followed by a return to growth for organic EBITDA, and will be followed in due course
by a return to growth for EBIT/AOP
Source: Berenberg estimates
We try to reflect specific margin pressures We try to reflect specific margin pressures We try to reflect specific margin pressures We try to reflect specific margin pressures and benefits on a and benefits on a and benefits on a and benefits on a business unitbusiness unitbusiness unitbusiness unit levellevellevellevel
Our estimates also assume that Vodafone can see EBITDA margins expand over the next three years, from 28.3% in FY16 to 30.7% in FY19, implying a three-year EBITDA CAGR of 4.8% pa off a revenue CAGR of c2% pa. In regional terms, we expect Europe margins to expand by 160bp to 30.4% in FY19, and AMAP margins to expand by 330bp to 33.9% by FY19.
Embedded in our expectations are the following assumptions on a business unit level.
● Germany impact due to United Internet migration: We assume that Vodafone will see an impact to German EBITDA margins from the loss of MVNO revenues in Germany where we factor in margins reducing from 32.6% in FY16 to 32.0% by FY19. We assume United Internet starts to migrate customers to its 4G agreement with Telefónica Deutschland, and that Vodafone sees increased commercial expenses as it responds to higher subsidies from Deutsche Telekom.
● UK margin progression pauses in FY17: We assume UK margin progression pauses in FY17 as Vodafone gets to grips with the hangover from its Q4 billing problems, combined with 0.5ppt of margin pressure from higher 900Mhz/1800Mhz spectrum fees, with a partial offset from price increases. In the mid-term we assume recovery in margins in the UK.
● Spain margins restrained in the near term: Vodafone has clearly guided to an incremental €180m of EBITDA pressure in Spain from the unwind of prior year’s EBITDA benefits arising from the treatment of handset expenses. In addition, Mediapro content costs will reach a higher run-rate in FY17 (we expect c£100m versus £50m in FY16). We assume the margin benefit of price increases offers a partial offset to these pressures in FY17, resulting in modest margin compression, before margins expansion is reasserted from FY18 onwards.
● Increased competition in India from Reliance Jio: We assume increased commercial expenses and constrained revenue trends in India as a result of the entry of Reliance Jio. This results in India margins remaining at the 30% level through FY17 and FY18, before recovering the expansion trend in FY19 onwards.
● Netherlands affected by revenue turndown: In FY17 we assume 110bp of margin compression in the Netherlands, taking margins to 33%, as Vodafone tackles the increased pressure on ARPU arising from a resurgent KPN, and the emergence of convergence in the Dutch market. Obviously, assuming the Vodafone/Liberty deal in
-2.3% -3.0% -2.8%
-0.4%
1.0%2.0%
-2.7%
-11.0%-10.0%
-3.6%
1.9%3.6%
-35.0%
-30.0%
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
H1/14 H2/14 H1/15 H2/15 H1/16 H2/16
Vodafone group organic revenue and EBITDA trends (HY yoy %)
Group revenues Group service revenues Adj. EBITDA Adj. Op Profit
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
32
the Netherlands is approved, we expect the resulting joint venture to be treated as an equity-accounted associate after deal completion, with returns to benefit from the extraction of synergies and an improvement of the competitive position.
● Margin pressure in Greece: Given the top-line trends in Greece in Q4 we think it makes sense to assume some degree of margin pressure in FY17 – we assume margins will fall from 27.7% to 25% as Vodafone responds to the current price war here.
Where is the risk in our numbers?Where is the risk in our numbers?Where is the risk in our numbers?Where is the risk in our numbers?
We worry about India where we have yet to fully see the result of Reliance Jio’s market entry. We are less concerned than Vodafone about pricing in Italy on the basis that it has always been tough, and if the Wind/Three deal gets blocked then both operators will have little choice but to raise prices, in our view.
We are keeping a close eye on Germany too, given its important to Vodafone (20% of group service revenues and 22.5% of group EBITDA in FY17), and a small number of red flags in that market (eg Deutsche Telekom raising subsidies, Telefónica Deutschland adding 1GB of data to the bundle with recent offers, lower prices from Drillisch and United Internet, and, of course, the Bundesliga rights auction outcome).
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
33
“Good” capex reflects success of project Spring
We regard Vodafone’s increased mid-term capex guidance as “good” capex, rather than a transition of project Spring into “project Summer”. There are enough signs that Spring has been successful to justify extending the spend into areas that present an opportunity to either support revenues or improve cost efficiencies.
Even with the increased guidance for “mid-teens” capex/sales, compared to 13-14% under the old guidance, absolute capex will still show a material fall in FY17, boosting FCF and restoring cash flow cover of the dividend.
New guidance implies incremental cumulative capex of £New guidance implies incremental cumulative capex of £New guidance implies incremental cumulative capex of £New guidance implies incremental cumulative capex of £2.4bn for FY172.4bn for FY172.4bn for FY172.4bn for FY17----19191919
We have factored Vodafone’s higher guidance for capex (to be in the mid-teens as a percentage of sales) into our estimates, and this has resulted in a cumulative additional capex of £2.4bn over the next three years (FY17-19) compared to our old forecasts.
To put his additional capex into context, it compares to the original Spring capex guidance of £7bn over FY14/15/16, and lifts our cumulative three-year capex for FY17-19 from £18.3bn to £20.7bn.
This looks like good capex to us and seems to not have affected Vodafone’s confidence in generating an incremental £1bn of FCF “post-Spring”. Our estimates imply capex/sales averaging 15.6% over FY17-19, consistent with the company’s guidance of “mid-teens” capex/sales, which in side comments to the results management qualified as meaning 14-16%, in contrast to the former guidance of 13-14%.
The move is consistent with Vodafone management commentary regarding its old guidance which stated clearly that if the results of Spring were good, and the opportunity existed to improve its position in certain markets, then it would continue to invest at above the 13-14% range.
We think this is a relatively modest adjustment to guidance which seems consistent with management’s more evident confidence in at least the outlook for EBITDA, and probably also in the outlook for revenues in the mid-term. In the historical context, a significant reduction in absolute capex is still implied in FY17 from the levels of the last two years (see Figure 37).
Spring success seems evidentSpring success seems evidentSpring success seems evidentSpring success seems evident
While Vodafone is able to present plenty of evidence that project Spring has delivered on its objectives, publicly available and independent qualification of the benefits of project Spring is hard to find. Later we reprise Vodafone’s data points showing the success of project Spring, but first, we recap some of the recent independent network tests in some of Vodafone’s major markets.
Germany – the clear runner-up: In Germany, the 2015 Connect test showed that Vodafone has increased the network quality gap versus Telefónica Deutschland and E-Plus, and closed the gap on Deutsche Telekom over the last year. Vodafone took a tight win on points in voice telephony, with Deutsche Telekom very close in second place, and Telefónica Deutschland/E-Plus some way off in third and fourth place respectively.
In the mobile data/large cities category, Vodafone came second to Deutsche Telekom, with Telefónica Deutschland a close third and E-Plus a distant fourth. In smaller cities, Telefónica Deutschland level-pegged with Vodafone in second place behind Deutsche Telekom.
On the streets, Vodafone again occupied second place behind Deutsche Telekom, with Telefónica Deutschland and E-Plus in distant third and fourth places. On trains, Deutsche Telkom’s network performance outstrips the other three by a large margin, with Vodafone in a distant second place.
Overall, the Connect 2015 study concludes that Vodafone is “the clear runner-up” and “among Germany’s top networks”, but concluded that Vodafone’s improvement in the voice test (due to early implementation of VoLTE) contrasted with a “slight deterioration” in the data test.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
34
UK – playing catch-up with EE: In the UK, evidence that Spring has led to an improved network position is difficult to find. EE is typically regarded as having the best network, for example in the recent RootMetrics study, EE led in five of six categories. RootMetrics cited Vodafone for “strong call reliability and improved speeds”, and Vodafone placed second on network speed, and improved its performance in Northern Ireland and Scotland. RootMetrics further concluded that as Vodafone expanded its 4G presence it would see further improvement in its UK ranking.
Opensignal’s April 2016 UK market report provides additional colour, supporting the idea of EE as the best network in the UK, and showing that Vodafone has ground to make up. However, according to Opensignal, Vodafone scored second on 4G network coverage, third on overall download speeds, second on 3G download speed, but last on 4G download speeds, and second to last on 3G and 4G latency.
Italy – Vodafone is the leader, says Opensignal: In Italy, according to Opensignal, Vodafone’s position looks strong, with top marks in the Opensignal May 2016 report for 4G coverage, 3G latency, overall download speeds, 3G download speeds and 4G download speeds. TIM scored first for 4G latency, with Vodafone in second place, and Three Italy shared top marks with Vodafone on 4G download speeds.
Spain – Vodafone is top performer, says Connect: In Spain, Vodafone rates as the top performer, according to the Connect study for 2015, pretty much sweeping the board in the voice test, taking first place for call success ratio, call setup time, and speech quality in big cities in the drive test. In smaller cities, Vodafone rated first in call success and speech quality, and second on call setup time. Vodafone also led on mobile data in large cities, generally scoring the leading success ratio and highest download and upload speeds (except, strangely, in the standard definition YouTube test). Likewise in the small cities mobile data test, Vodafone ranked first.
Netherlands – a third place: In the Netherlands, Vodafone occupies third place in the recent Connect test, undermined by its mobile data download speeds. T-Mobile leads in the Dutch market, perhaps a by-product of its low market share, followed by KPN, then Vodafone, then Tele2.
Notably, the gap between operators in certain categories of the test is quite narrow. For example, on mobile data access in large cities the top score of 96% goes to T-Mobile Netherlands?, while the lowest score is only 3ppt below T-Mobile Netherlands?, at 93% for Tele2 (tied with Vodafone on 93% too). The distinction is more meaningful in small cities, where T-Mobile Netherlands leads with a score of 96% and Tele2 takes fourth place with 85% (Vodafone comes third with 90%).
Vodafone’s own Vodafone’s own Vodafone’s own Vodafone’s own datadatadatadata pointspointspointspoints qualify Springqualify Springqualify Springqualify Spring as a successas a successas a successas a success
In contrast, Vodafone can list plenty of data points showing the success of the project Spring capex programme. We summarise the key data points in Figure 36, which shows solid progress on group net promoter scores, churn rates, dropped calls, call success rates, 4G coverage, and next-generation network (NGN) coverage, among others.
Figure 38 shows Vodafone’s progress on Spring against the original targets, showing that it overachieved its targets in AMAP, but fell slightly short in Europe (although management claims overall that it achieved 108% of total Spring targets).
Importantly, these data points coincide with a meaningful improvement in service revenue trends, which have reversed from a decline to growth, and in EBITDA trends that likewise reversed from decline to growth.
We recognise that it is impossible to say precisely what caused this effect. It could be simply that European economies are in a better place than they were 3-4 years ago (our note Misunderstood mobile, dated 6 January 2015, showed that the key driver of the best-performing mobile markets of the prior six years was the state of the economy). At least we can say that Vodafone’s project Spring investment has coincided with a material improvement in revenue and EBITDA trends.
Additional capex targets meaningful areasAdditional capex targets meaningful areasAdditional capex targets meaningful areasAdditional capex targets meaningful areas
Vodafone’s additional capex will be spent in several areas, roughly equally split between wireline and mobile projects, and on IT.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
35
Figure 36: Project Spring signs of success
Net promoter scores are up, churn is down, dropped calls and call connections have improved, 3G, 4G and NGN coverage
has expanded, and enterprise capability has increased, all coinciding with improved revenue and EBITDA trends
CriteriaCriteriaCriteriaCriteria PrePrePrePre----SpringSpringSpringSpring PostPostPostPost----SpringSpringSpringSpring
Group net promoter score – difference to next best competitor -4.7pts +2.0pts
Mobile churn – consumer contract >18.5% 16.7%
Mobile churn – enterprise >16% 15.4%
Customer experience – 3G/4G data sessions > 3Mbs 76% 91%
Customer experience – dropped call rate 1.3% <0.9%
Customer experience – dropped call rate EU >0.9% 0.46%
Customer experience – dropped call rate AMAP >1.3% 0.86%
Customer experience – call setup success EU <98.8% 99.9%
Customer experience – call setup success AMAP <98.2% 99.3%
Mobile network reach – EU 4G coverage 32% 87%
Mobile network reach – India 3G coverage (1) 83% 95%
Converged services – HH with own NGN 14m 30m
Converged services – fixed BB customers 6.9m 13.4m
Enterprise capability – IoT platform country footprint 22 30
Enterprise capability – IP-VPN PoPs 171 268
Service revenue growth (2) -3%-4% +1.8%
EBITDA growth (3) -6.9% +2.7%
Source: Company data. 1) In target Indian cities. 2) pre-Spring relates to H2 FY13 and H1 FY14. 3) pre-Spring relates to H1 and H2 FY14.
The capex seems to us to be partly related to projects that will drive more revenues (eg 4G in AMAP, customer premises equipment, or CPE in wireline), and partly to projects that will aid efficiency improvements (eg IT transformation).
European 4G mobile: Capex will further increase densification of the network ahead of 5G later in the decade, where Vodafone desires to gain the lead. In the original Spring plan, Vodafone aimed for 82k 4G sites and 101k 3G sites in Europe. Over 95% of EU city sites (cities with over 100k inhabitants) will be backhauled with fibre, compared to 59% at present. This new target is not comparable with the old Spring target of 98% of European sites to be backhauled with “high capacity” connections since that target incorporated microwave Ethernet backhaul as well as fibre backhaul.
Figure 37: Vodafone capex guidance
Vodafone’s new capex guidance adds £2.4bn to our FY17-19 cumulative capex estimate, but capex
will still decline significantly in FY17
Source: Company data
52926313
9197 8599
6272 5886 6125
622 948 811
13.9%
16.5%
21.8%21.0%
15.9% 15.4% 15.4%
14.7% 14.4% 14.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E
Ca
pe
x/s
ale
s %
Ca
pe
x £
m
Vodafone capex - the old and the new
New capex £m
Capex (old) £m
Capex/sales (new) %
Capex/sales (old) %
6902 6848 6950
Project Spring capex
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
36
Figure 38: Project Spring progress report as of FY16
Vodafone over-delivered against Spring targets in AMAP, and under- delivered in Europe
Spring categorySpring categorySpring categorySpring category AchievedAchievedAchievedAchieved TargetTargetTargetTarget
EuropeEuropeEuropeEurope
4G outdoor coverage +55ppt to 87% 91% ** miss **
Single RAN +40ppt to 93% 97% ** miss **
High capacity backhaul +25ppt to 90% 98% ** miss **
AMAPAMAPAMAPAMAP
3G/4G outdoor coverage (ex India) +10ppt to 85% 84% ** beat **
4G coverage (ex India) +36ppt to 37% na
India 3G coverage in targeted urban areas 95% 95% ** hit **
Single RAN +29ppt to 58% 51% ** beat **
High capacity backhaul +28ppt to 63% 52% ** beat **
Group network targetsGroup network targetsGroup network targetsGroup network targets
4G sites 76k 77k ** miss **
3G sites 77k 73k ** beat **
2G sites 50k 47k ** beat **
Single RAN 115k 106k ** beat
High capacity backhaul 102k 87k ** beat **
Source: Company data
AMAP accelerated 4G expansion: There are no specific targets given for this contribution to higher capex, but at least we can say that 4G deployment in AMAP is currently in its very early stages. Under its old Spring targets, Vodafone aimed for a mere 7,000 4G sites in AMAP, excluding India, but then never gave a 4G target for India. India is likely a key target for 4G expansion given the pending launch of Reliance Jio whose strategy is built on 4G.
Vodafone says that it achieves a 2.7-year payback on investment in 4G sites in India, so it makes sense to invest more in this area. At present, Vodafone has 3G presence in 16 circles, accounting for 90% of service revenues, and a 4G presence in 5 circles accounting for 45% of data revenues. Vodafone expects that by year-end (FY17) it will increase the 4G presence to 9 circles which account for over 60% of data revenues.
Fixed – fibre footprint expansion (southern Europe): Given that Vodafone has just signed a deal with Enel whereby it will access Enel’s 7.5m households (HH) fibre network as it is deployed over the next few years, we assume that this increased fibre capex for southern Europe will be targeted at Spain, Portugal, and Turkey. There are several factors encouraging Vodafone to be more aggressive in deploying own-fibre in certain markets.
● Record BB net additions: Vodafone is doing very well signing broadband (BB) customers. Q4 was a record quarter with Vodafone signing 416k BB adds (from 414k in Q3 and 230k in Q2). More importantly, Vodafone saw a significant increase in NGN BB additions (ie to cable, fibre), signing 426k, up from 382k in Q3 and 322k in Q2.
● Positive BB revenue growth: European fixed-wire service revenues showed accelerating organic growth of 5.4% in Q4 (3.7% in Q3, 3.1% in Q2). This compares to European mobile service revenues which showed a decline of 1.1% yoy in Q4. In Spain in Q4 fixed-wire revenues showed growth of 4.2% (compared to a mobile service revenue decline of 6.4%).
● Declining churn with convergence: Many operators are reporting that converged customers churn less than single-product customers. Vodafone gave two examples: in Spain, it is citing convergence resulting in churn falling from 26% to 14% on a same-cohort basis, while in Italy it cites churn falling from 21% to 10% when a customer takes a converged service package.
● Margin benefits of own network: The financial rationale for increasing its own NGN footprint goes beyond revenues to margins. Vodafone states that the 5.5m BB customers who are “on-net”, that is, connected to its own infrastructure, are far higher margin than those who are connected through wholesale agreements with the incumbent (ie using bitstream or unbundled local loop (ULL) mechanisms). In essence, investing in own-fibre NGN is effecting a capex for opex swap which provides a recurring benefit to margins in exchange for a one-time investment in capex.
Fixed – rapid DOCSIS 3.1 deployment: This must relate to KDG in Germany and Ono in Spain, although again, no targets were specified. We are sceptical that households need
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
37
gigabit speeds and super-low latencies with domestic BB services (in the past we estimated that the average household would require BB speeds of 80-100Mbs).
However, we recognise the marketing and brand advantages of being able to compete by claiming the fastest broadband speeds in the market. In Germany, DOCSIS 3.1 will allow Vodafone to stay ahead of the incumbent Deutsche Telekom, whose strategy is based on VDSL plus vectoring and/or G.fast, offering the potential for download speeds of 2-300Mbs. DOCSIS 3.1 will retain an advantage for cable. In Spain, Vodafone needs to respond to the deployment of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH), capable of gigabit speeds, by incumbent Telefónica.
Fixed – customer success-led CPE. We believe this relates to the capitalisation of set top boxes (ie modems, routers, TV set top boxes), and is a clear indication that Vodafone is expecting a higher volume of gross additions in wireline broadband and TV, and hence improved revenues. Again, it is worth reflecting on the improving pace of BB adds and NGN BB adds seen by Vodafone in recent quarters, which must underpin its confidence in investing more in this area, with resultant benefits not only to revenues, but also to churn rates when the sale is made in conjunction with a mobile service.
Some basic sums are due: Vodafone had 13.4m broadband subscribers across the group (of which 12.3m are in Europe, and 6.5m are NGN) at end-Q4. Over the prior 12 months, the gr0up saw net adds of 1.3m. If we assume that churn in BB is c15%, and that Vodafone wants to improve the BB adds rate to, say, 1.5m, then that implies Vodafone seeing gross broadband additions in FY17 of 3.5m. We do not know Vodafone’s capitalised CPE cost per gross broadband addition, but it would typically be c£50 for a low-end BB customer, and it could be c£400 for a high-end TV set-top box (STB) addition. If we strike an average somewhere around the £100 mark, then 3.5m gross adds would indicate capitalised CPE capex of £350m. Over three years, that is a cumulative £1bn, or 42% of the £2.4bn increase in our FY17-19 cumulative capex estimates, assuming, of course, that the CPE capex is all incremental, which it would not be.
So where does that leave our new midSo where does that leave our new midSo where does that leave our new midSo where does that leave our new mid----term FCF and dividend coterm FCF and dividend coterm FCF and dividend coterm FCF and dividend cover estimates?ver estimates?ver estimates?ver estimates?
We now project FY17/18/19 FCF of £3.1bn, £4.4bn and £4.7bn, for a cumulative £12.3bn. This compares to just below the mid-point (£12.8bn) of management’s long-term incentive programme (LTIP) target range of £10.9bn-14.8bn (€13.8bn-18.8bn, mid-point €16.3bn). Given our modest (c2% pa) dividend growth expectations, that means that our FCF forecasts imply cash cost dividend cover of 1.04x, 1.44x and 1.5x for FY17/18/19 respectively (see Figure 39). If we include anticipated spectrum costs in the dividend cover calculation, then dividends are not covered in FY17, but are covered from FY18 onwards. Vodafone group policy is to pay a rising dividend, and our estimates suggest that this is perfectly possible.
Figure 39: Dividend cover under our new estimates
Dividends are covered by FCF (guidance definition), but uncovered in FY17
once anticipated spectrum costs are included in FCF; the group dividend
policy is to pay a rising dividend
Source: Company data
4,183
1,088 1,013
3,109
4,3084,616
5,129
0.8
0.4 0.3
1.0
1.4 1.5 1.6
0.65
0.22
(0.64)
0.18
1.211.36 1.49
(4.0)
(3.0)
(2.0)
(1.0)
0.0
1.0
2.0
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Div
iden
d c
ov
er x
FC
F £
m
Vodafone FCF and dividend cover profileFree casflow (£m incl Spring - lhs)Div cover (ex spectrum - rhs)Div cover (with specturm - rhs)
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
38
Indian spectrum risk?
How much will How much will How much will How much will Vodafone spend in the upcVodafone spend in the upcVodafone spend in the upcVodafone spend in the upcoming Indian spectrum auctions?oming Indian spectrum auctions?oming Indian spectrum auctions?oming Indian spectrum auctions?
At the reserve prices published by the Indian authorities, the implied cost for 5MHz of nationwide low band spectrum is c$5.5bn, which most observers seem to believe is unrealistic. At the same time, Vodafone could do with expanding its spectrum portfolio in India. While Vodafone has not explicitly guided on expected spectrum spend in India, it has given enough data points for us to triangulate a reasonable figure to put into our FY17 cash flow estimates. There are three key data points we can use.
● Vodafone wants to retain its BBB+ credit rating, which means keeping net debt/EBITDA at 2-2.5x.
● Vodafone has given FCF guidance (ex-spectrum costs) for FY17 of “over €4bn”, and has intimated its ambition to achieve the mid-term FCF targets that form the basis of management’s LTIP. The low end of the LTIP calls for cumulative FCF of €13.8bn (£10.9bn), the high end calls for €18.8bn (£14.8bn), and the mid-point calls for €16.3bn (£12.8bn).
● CFO Nick Read said on the Q4 conference call that spectrum costs would be below the average (£2.3bn pa) of the last five years.
We can use these data points to estimate how Vodafone’s financial firepower, or headroom, will develop over the next few years, giving us an indication of its flexibility to bid for Indian spectrum. If we assume that Vodafone holds its net debt/EBITDA at 2.5x for FY17-19, we can see, in Figure 34, that in FY17 it would have headroom of £1.5bn, rising to £4.2bn in FY18 and £7bn in FY19, making for a cumulative total of £12.7bn over FY17-19.
Figure 40: Vodafone financial headroom, assuming net debt/EBITDA is maintained at 2.5x (BBB+)
The first chart shows how Vodafone’s net debt/EBITDA develops, using our FCF estimates, but with
zero spend on spectrum (not our official spectrum forecast); this provides us with a baseline against
which to judge Vodafone’s financial headroom; the second chart shows the financial headroom that
would exist if Vodafone was to hold net debt/EBITDA steady at 2.5x. Financial headroom could be
used to purchase spectrum (or pay more dividends); note that these calculations take account of our
current dividend assumptions
Source: Berenberg estimates
29175 30140 29036 2769025849
2.512.38
2.182.00
1.81
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20
2.40
2.60
2.80
3.00
20000
22000
24000
26000
28000
30000
32000
34000
36000
38000
40000
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Ne
t d
eb
t/E
BIT
DA
(x
)
Ne
t d
eb
t £
m
Vodafone ND/EBITDA (no spectrum spend)
Net debt £m ND/EBITDA (x)
15374214
69899801
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Ne
t d
eb
t £
m
Vodafone - financial headroom if ND/EBITDA maintained at 2.5xHeadroom £m
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
39
Figure 41: Vodafone’s financial headroom assuming net debt/EBITDA is maintained at 2.25x (BBB+)
If Vodafone aimed to hold its net debt/EBITDA steady at 2.25x, it would not have any headroom to
buy spectrum in FY17, but would have c£0.9bn headroom in FY18, rising to £3.5bn headroom in FY19
Source: Berenberg estimates
That seems to be quite a lot of mid-term financial firepower for spectrum (or for other purposes), especially if Vodafone is prepared to step a little over the 2.5x level for a short period of time. However, what if Vodafone wants to be a little more conservative, and instead aims to keep net debt/EBITDA at 2.25x? We show the headroom from this scenario in Figure 41 above. Under this scenario Vodafone has limited room to splurge on spectrum, as it would be required to conserve £1.6bn of FCF in FY17. In FY 18, it would have headroom of c£0.9bn, rising to £3.5bn in FY19, for cumulative headroom over the three years of £2.8bn.
We now compare these two scenarios with CFO Nick Read’s comments from the Q4 conference call when asked about the outlook for spectrum spend:
“… over the last five years, we’ve averaged about £2.3bn (pa), given heavy 4G acquisition across Europe and 3G and 4G in India. If we look at the three-year horizon, it will be lower, because essentially Italy is a renewal of 900MHz in FY19. The 700MHz in Europe is not in the next three-year envelope and in India, if you look at the pricing of the low-band spectrum, it looks a challenging business case, so we will definitely be rational on India.”
The message seems clear, and is supported by our net debt/EBITDA scenari0 analysis. As such, we are going to include a precautionary £2bn estimate (increased from our earlier £500m plug) for spectrum spend in India in our Vodafone FY17 estimates.
Figure 42: Indian spectrum in 2016 recap
• In January 2016 India’s TRAI published reserve prices for spectrum to be auctioned in 2016
• Auction is for spectrum in bands 700/800/900/1800/2100/2300/2500MHz
• In aggregate over 2000MHz of spectrum bandwidth is to be auctioned
• In March, the Indian DoT referred the TRAI’s spectrum recommendations back to the TRAI, essentially
asking it to reconsider the structure of the auction and reserve prices.
• In April 2016 the TRAI responded, essentially maintaining the vast majority of its original proposals.
• Most Indian operators have expressed the view that the auction offers too much spectrum and that
reserve prices are too high.
• If all spectrum was acquired at the suggested reserve prices, we estimate the total cost to the Indian
mobile service provider industry would be £57bn.
• We estimate the cost of 5MHz of nationwide 700MHz spectrum at €8bn, at the reserve price.
• It seems extremely unlikely to us that operators participate fully in the auction.
• Instead we expect operators to cherry-pick the auction to pad out their existing portfolios, perhaps
with an eye to future consolidation potential.
• The auction had been expected to start around mid-July, but Indian authorities do not have a great
track record of starting auctions on time.
Source: Berenberg data
-1631
889 35216236
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
FY16 FY17E FY18E FY19E FY20E
Ne
t d
eb
t £
m
Vodafone - financial headroom if ND/EBITDA maintained at 2.5xHeadroom £m
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
40
Financials
Profit and loss account
Year-end March(GBP m) 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Group RevenuesGroup RevenuesGroup RevenuesGroup Revenues 42,22742,22742,22742,227 40,97340,97340,97340,973 43,40643,40643,40643,406 44,28944,28944,28944,289 45,07645,07645,07645,076
Group EBITDAGroup EBITDAGroup EBITDAGroup EBITDA 11,91511,91511,91511,915 11,61211,61211,61211,612 12,62912,62912,62912,629 13,08813,08813,08813,088 13,68313,68313,68313,683
EBITDA margin 28.2% 28.3% 29.1% 29.6% 30.4%
Depreciation and Amortisation -8,345 -8,539 -9,021 -9,033 -8,955
Associates -63 44 90 98 110
Discontinued operations 0 0 0 0 0
Group AOPGroup AOPGroup AOPGroup AOP 3,5073,5073,5073,507 3,1173,1173,1173,117 3,6973,6973,6973,697 4,1534,1534,1534,153 4,8384,8384,8384,838
Adj. net finance expense -1,290 -1,375 -1,393 -1,462 -1,429
Group adjusted PBT 2,217 1,742 2,305 2,691 3,409
Adjusted Tax expense -569 -175 -633 -739 -925
Non-controlling interest -177 -223 -330 -370 -395
Adjusted PATAdjusted PATAdjusted PATAdjusted PAT 1,4711,4711,4711,471 1,3441,3441,3441,344 1,3421,3421,3421,342 1,5821,5821,5821,582 2,0892,0892,0892,089
Adjusted EPS (basic) 5.55 5.04 5.03 5.93 7.83
Adjusted EPS (Dil) 5.53 5.05 5.03 5.93 7.83
DPS 11.22 11.45 11.68 11.91 12.15
Shares ranking (dil.) 26,615 26,692 26,692 26,692 26,692
Source: Company data, Berenberg estimates
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
41
Revenue and EBITDA segmentation
Year-end March (GBP m) 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
Revenue by segmentRevenue by segmentRevenue by segmentRevenue by segment
Germany (incl. KDG) 8,384 7,787 8,555 8,698 8,740
Italy 4,587 4,405 4,748 4,788 4,847
UK (incl.CWW) 6,199 6,173 6,287 6,395 6,496
Spain 3,614 3,633 3,850 3,948 4,031
Netherlands 1,482 1,383 1,435 1,431 1,433
Portugal 767 712 762 757 763
Romania - - - - -
Greece 576 621 651 660 670
Other Europe 2,168 2,119 2,239 2,269 2,287
EUROPEEUROPEEUROPEEUROPE 27,68727,68727,68727,687 26,71826,71826,71826,718 28,41728,41728,41728,417 28,83628,83628,83628,836 29,15529,15529,15529,155
India 4,309 4,516 4,779 4,836 4,979
Vodacom 4,341 3,887 3,970 4,111 4,222
Turkey 2,026 2,170 2,597 2,830 3,005
Egypt 1,190 1,197 1,119 1,153 1,177
Other AMAP 1,527 1,447 1,486 1,486 1,500
AMAPAMAPAMAPAMAP 13,38213,38213,38213,382 13,20813,20813,20813,208 13,94213,94213,94213,942 14,40614,40614,40614,406 14,87414,87414,87414,874
Total Total Total Total RevenuesRevenuesRevenuesRevenues 42,22742,22742,22742,227 40,97340,97340,97340,973 43,40643,40643,40643,406 44,28944,28944,28944,289 45,07645,07645,07645,076
EBITDA by segment
Germany (incl.KDG) 2,659 2,537 2,840 2,783 2,797
Italy 1,535 1,478 1,685 1,748 1,793
UK (incl. CWW) 1,345 1,289 1,352 1,407 1,462
Spain 782 915 963 1,026 1,108
Netherlands 507 472 474 472 487
Portugal 289 250 270 273 282
Romania - - - - -
Greece 158 172 163 178 194
Other EuropeOther EuropeOther EuropeOther Europe 619619619619 573573573573 616616616616 658658658658 709709709709
EUROPEEUROPEEUROPEEUROPE 7,8947,8947,8947,894 7,6867,6867,6867,686 8,3638,3638,3638,363 8,5468,5468,5468,546 8,8338,8338,8338,833
India 1,282 1,331 1,434 1,451 1,519
Vodacom 1,527 1,484 1,588 1,706 1,816
Turkey 366 405 519 594 661
Egypt 522 499 476 507 530
Other AMAP 389 323 349 364 375
AMAPAMAPAMAPAMAP 4,0864,0864,0864,086 4,0424,0424,0424,042 4,3664,3664,3664,366 4,6224,6224,6224,622 4,9004,9004,9004,900
Total EBITDATotal EBITDATotal EBITDATotal EBITDA 11,91511,91511,91511,915 11,61211,61211,61211,612 12,62912,62912,62912,629 13,08813,08813,08813,088 13,68313,68313,68313,683
Source: Company data, Berenberg estimates
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
42
EBITDA margins
(%) 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
EBITDA EBITDA EBITDA EBITDA MarginsMarginsMarginsMargins
Germany (incl. KDG) 31.7 % 32.6 % 33.2 % 32.0 % 32.0 %
Italy 33.5 % 33.6 % 35.5 % 36.5 % 37.0 %
UK (incl. CWW) 21.7 % 20.9 % 21.5 % 22.0 % 22.5 %
Spain 21.6 % 25.2 % 25.0 % 26.0 % 27.5 %
Netherlands 34.2 % 34.1 % 33.0 % 33.0 % 34.0 %
Portugal 37.7 % 35.1 % 35.5 % 36.0 % 37.0 %
Romania - - - - -
Greece 27.4 % 27.7 % 25.0 % 27.0 % 29.0 %
Other Europe 28.6 % 27.0 % 27.5 % 29.0 % 31.0 %
EUROPEEUROPEEUROPEEUROPE 28.5 %28.5 %28.5 %28.5 % 28.8 %28.8 %28.8 %28.8 % 29.4 %29.4 %29.4 %29.4 % 29.6 %29.6 %29.6 %29.6 % 30.3 %30.3 %30.3 %30.3 %
India 29.8 % 29.5 % 30.0 % 30.0 % 30.5 %
Vodacom 35.2 % 38.2 % 40.0 % 41.5 % 43.0 %
Turkey 18.1 % 18.7 % 20.0 % 21.0 % 22.0 %
Egypt 43.9 % 41.7 % 42.5 % 44.0 % 45.0 %
Other AMAP 25.5 % 22.3 % 23.5 % 24.5 % 25.0 %
AMAPAMAPAMAPAMAP 30.5 %30.5 %30.5 %30.5 % 30.6 %30.6 %30.6 %30.6 % 31.3 %31.3 %31.3 %31.3 % 32.1 %32.1 %32.1 %32.1 % 32.9 %32.9 %32.9 %32.9 %
Total Adjusted EBITDATotal Adjusted EBITDATotal Adjusted EBITDATotal Adjusted EBITDA 28.2 %28.2 %28.2 %28.2 % 28.3 %28.3 %28.3 %28.3 % 29.129.129.129.1 %%%% 29.6 %29.6 %29.6 %29.6 % 30.4 %30.4 %30.4 %30.4 %
Source: Company data, Berenberg estimates
Cash flow and net debt
GBP m 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
EBITDAEBITDAEBITDAEBITDA 11,91511,91511,91511,915 11,61211,61211,61211,612 12,62912,62912,62912,629 13,08813,08813,08813,088 13,68313,68313,68313,683
Working capital and other -795 42 100 100 100
Cash generated by operations 11,120 11,654 12,729 13,188 13,783
Cash capital expenditures -8,435 -8,910 -7,694 -6,834 -6,936
Disposal of PPE 178 140 150 150 150
Operating free cash flowOperating free cash flowOperating free cash flowOperating free cash flow 2,8632,8632,8632,863 2,8842,8842,8842,884 5,1855,1855,1855,185 6,5046,5046,5046,504 6,9976,9976,9976,997
Taxation -758 -689 -876 -955 -1,176
Dividend Income (net) 224 67 81 104 128
Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders -246 -223 -236 -248 -261
Interest received and paid -995 -1,026 -1,045 -1,096 -1,072
Free cash flowFree cash flowFree cash flowFree cash flow 1,0881,0881,0881,088 1,0131,0131,0131,013 3,1093,1093,1093,109 4,3084,3084,3084,308 4,6164,6164,6164,616
Tax settlement 0 0 0 0 0
Spectrum payments -443 -2,944 -2,570 -570 -341
Acquisitions and disposals -7,040 -96 -787 0 0
Equity dividends paid -2,927 -2,998 -3,027 -3,087 -3,149
Purchase of treasury shares 0 0 0 0 0
Foreign exchange 895 -1,968 0 0 0
Dividends from VZW 0 0 0 0 0
Other -144 -2,665 -300 -300 -300
Net debt Net debt Net debt Net debt decrease/(increase)decrease/(increase)decrease/(increase)decrease/(increase) ----8,5718,5718,5718,571 ----6,9046,9046,9046,904 ----3,5753,5753,5753,575 351351351351 826826826826
Opening Net (Debt) Cash 13,700 22,271 29,175 32,750 32,399
Closing Net (Debt) Cash 22,271 29,175 32,750 32,399 31,573
FCF is after Spring capex of -3,500 -2,950 0 0 0
FCF is after Spring opex of -500 -300 0 0 0
FCF ((per VOD guidance, post Spring, pre-spectrum) 1,088 1,013 3,109 4,308 4,616
FCF (post-Spring and spectrum) 645 -1,931 539 3,738 4,275
FCF (recurring, pre-Spring and spectrum) 5,088 4,263 3,109 4,308 4,616
Dividend cover
by FCF (per-guidance) 0.37x 0.34x 1.03x 1.40x 1.47x
by FCF (fully loaded) 0.22x -0.64x 0.18x 1.21x 1.36x
by FCF (recurring) 1.74x 1.42x 1.03x 1.40x 1.47x
Source: Company data, Berenberg estimates
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
43
Please note that the use of this research report is subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in the “General invePlease note that the use of this research report is subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in the “General invePlease note that the use of this research report is subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in the “General invePlease note that the use of this research report is subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in the “General investmentstmentstmentstment----related related related related disclosures” and the “Legal disclaimer” at the end of this document. disclosures” and the “Legal disclaimer” at the end of this document. disclosures” and the “Legal disclaimer” at the end of this document. disclosures” and the “Legal disclaimer” at the end of this document.
For analyst certification and remarks regardinFor analyst certification and remarks regardinFor analyst certification and remarks regardinFor analyst certification and remarks regarding foreign investors and countryg foreign investors and countryg foreign investors and countryg foreign investors and country----specific disclosures, please refer to the respective specific disclosures, please refer to the respective specific disclosures, please refer to the respective specific disclosures, please refer to the respective paragraph at the end of this document.paragraph at the end of this document.paragraph at the end of this document.paragraph at the end of this document.
Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz ––––
WpHG)WpHG)WpHG)WpHG)
CompanyCompanyCompanyCompany DisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosures Vodafone Group plc no disclosures (1) Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”) and/or its affiliate(s) was Lead Manager or Co-
Lead Manager over the previous 12 months of a public offering of this company. (2) The Bank acts as Designated Sponsor for this company. (3) Over the previous 12 months, the Bank and/or its affiliate(s) has effected an agreement with this company for investment
banking services or received compensation or a promise to pay from this company for investment banking services. (4) The Bank and/or its affiliate(s) holds 5% or more of the share capital of this company. (5) The Bank holds a trading position in shares of this company. Historical price target and rating changes for Historical price target and rating changes for Historical price target and rating changes for Historical price target and rating changes for Vodafone Group plcVodafone Group plcVodafone Group plcVodafone Group plc in the lain the lain the lain the last 12 months st 12 months st 12 months st 12 months DateDateDateDate Price target Price target Price target Price target ---- GBPGBPGBPGBP RatingRatingRatingRating Initiation of coverageInitiation of coverageInitiation of coverageInitiation of coverage
02 September 15 2.64 Buy 25 January 10
29 December 15 2.50 Buy Berenberg Equity Research ratings distribution and in proportion to investment banking services, Berenberg Equity Research ratings distribution and in proportion to investment banking services, Berenberg Equity Research ratings distribution and in proportion to investment banking services, Berenberg Equity Research ratings distribution and in proportion to investment banking services, as of 1 as of 1 as of 1 as of 1 AprilAprilAprilApril 2016 2016 2016 2016 in respect of section 5 paragraph 4 of the German Financial Analysis Regulation in respect of section 5 paragraph 4 of the German Financial Analysis Regulation in respect of section 5 paragraph 4 of the German Financial Analysis Regulation in respect of section 5 paragraph 4 of the German Financial Analysis Regulation (Finanzanalyseverordnung (Finanzanalyseverordnung (Finanzanalyseverordnung (Finanzanalyseverordnung –––– FinAnV)FinAnV)FinAnV)FinAnV) Buy 50.75 % 78.79 % Sell 13.86 % 0.00 % Hold 35.39 % 21.21 %
Valuation basis/rating keyValuation basis/rating keyValuation basis/rating keyValuation basis/rating key The recommendations for companies analysed by Berenberg’s Equity Research department are made on an absolute basis for which the following three-step rating key is applicable:
Buy:Buy:Buy:Buy: Sustainable upside potential of more than 15% to the current share price within 12 months;
Sell:Sell:Sell:Sell: Sustainable downside potential of more than 15% to the current share price within 12 months;
Hold:Hold:Hold:Hold: Upside/downside potential regarding the current share price limited; no immediate catalyst visible.
NB: During periods of high market, sector, or stock volatility, or in special situations, the recommendation system criteria may be breached temporarily.
Competent supervisory authorityCompetent supervisory authorityCompetent supervisory authorityCompetent supervisory authority
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht -BaFin- (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority),
Graurheindorfer Straße 108, 53117 Bonn and Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
General investmentGeneral investmentGeneral investmentGeneral investment----related disclosuresrelated disclosuresrelated disclosuresrelated disclosures Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”) has made every effort to carefully research all information contained in this financial analysis. The information on which the financial analysis is based has been obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable such as, for example, Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg and the relevant specialised press as well as the company which is the subject of this financial analysis.
Only that part of the research note is made available to the issuer (who is the subject of this analysis) which is necessary to properly reconcile with the facts. Should this result in considerable changes a reference is made in the research note.
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
44
Opinions expressed in this financial analysis are our current opinions as of the issuing date indicated on this document. The companies covered by Berenberg are continuously followed by the analyst. Based on developments with the relevant company, the sector or the market which may have a material impact on the research views, research reports will be updated as it deems appropriate.
The functional job title of the person/s responsible for the recommendations contained in this report is “Equity Research Analyst” unless otherwise stated on the cover.
The following internet link provides further remarks on our financial analyses:The following internet link provides further remarks on our financial analyses:The following internet link provides further remarks on our financial analyses:The following internet link provides further remarks on our financial analyses: http://www.berenberg.de/research.html?&L=1http://www.berenberg.de/research.html?&L=1http://www.berenberg.de/research.html?&L=1http://www.berenberg.de/research.html?&L=1&no_cache=1&no_cache=1&no_cache=1&no_cache=1
Legal disclaimerLegal disclaimerLegal disclaimerLegal disclaimer This document has been prepared by Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”). This document does not claim completeness regarding all the information on the stocks, stock markets or developments referred to in it.
On no account should the document be regarded as a substitute for the recipient procuring information for himself/herself or exercising his/her own judgements.
The document has been produced for information purposes for institutional clients or market professionals.
Private customers, into whose possession this document comes, should discuss possible investment decisions with their customer service officer as differing views and opinions may exist with regard to the stocks referred to in this document.
This document is not a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell the mentioned stock.
The document may include certain descriptions, statements, estimates, and conclusions underlining potential market and company development. These reflect assumptions, which may turn out to be incorrect. The Bank and/or its employees accept no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss or damages of any kind arising out of the use of this document or any part of its content.
The Bank and/or its employees may hold, buy or sell positions in any securities mentioned in this document, derivatives thereon or related financial products. The Bank and/or its employees may underwrite issues for any securities mentioned in this document, derivatives thereon or related financial products or seek to perform capital market or underwriting services.
Analyst certificationAnalyst certificationAnalyst certificationAnalyst certification I, Paul Marsch, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers discussed herein.
In addition, I hereby certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research report, nor is it tied to any specific investment banking transaction performed by the Bank or its affiliates.
I, Laura Janssens, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers discussed herein.
In addition, I hereby certify that no part of my compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research report, nor is it tied to any specific investment banking transaction performed by the Bank or its affiliates.
Remarks regarding foreign investorsRemarks regarding foreign investorsRemarks regarding foreign investorsRemarks regarding foreign investors The preparation of this document is subject to regulation by German law. The distribution of this document in other jurisdictions may be restricted by law, and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.
United KingdomUnited KingdomUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom This document is meant exclusively for institutional investors and market professionals, but not for private customers. It is not for distribution to or the use of private investors or private customers.
United States of AmericaUnited States of AmericaUnited States of AmericaUnited States of America This document has been prepared exclusively by the Bank. Although Berenberg Capital Markets LLC, an affiliate of the Bank and registered US broker-dealer, distributes this document to certain customers, Berenberg Capital Markets LLC does not provide input into its contents, nor does this document constitute research of Berenberg Capital Markets LLC. In addition, this document is meant exclusively for institutional investors and market professionals, but not for private customers. It is not for distribution to or the use of private investors or private customers.
This document is classified as objective for the purposes of FINRA rules. Please contact Berenberg Capital Markets LLC (+1 617 292 8200) if you require additional information.
ThirdThirdThirdThird----party research disclosures party research disclosures party research disclosures party research disclosures
Vodafone Group plc
Telecommunications
45
CompanyCompanyCompanyCompany DisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosuresDisclosures Vodafone Group plc no disclosures (1) Berenberg Capital Markets LLC owned 1% or more of the outstanding shares of any class of the subject company by the end
of the prior month.* (2) Over the previous 12 months, Berenberg Capital Markets LLC has managed or co-managed any public offering for the subject
company.* (3) Berenberg Capital Markets LLC is making a market in the subject securities at the time of the report. (4) Berenberg Capital Markets LLC received compensation for investment banking services in the past 12 months, or expects to
receive such compensation in the next 3 months.* (5) There is another potential conflict of interest of the analyst or Berenberg Capital Markets LLC, of which the analyst knows
or has reason to know at the time of publication of this research report.
* For disclosures regarding affiliates of Berenberg Capital Markets LLC please refer to the ‘Disclosures in respect of section 34b of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz – WpHG)’ section above.
CopyrightCopyrightCopyrightCopyright The Bank reserves all the rights in this document. No part of the document or its content may be rewritten, copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the Bank’s prior written consent.
© September 2015 Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG
Contacts – Investment Banking
46
EQUITY RESEARCH Internet www.berenberg.com E-mail: [email protected]
RESEARCH
AEROSPACE & DEFENCE CHEMICALS GENERAL RETAIL REAL ESTATE
Andrew Gollan +44 20 3207 7891 Sebastian Bray +44 20 3753 3011 Conrad Bartos +44 20 3753 3053 Kai Klose +44 20 3207 7888
Charlotte Keyworth +44 20 3753 3013 Andrew Heap +44 20 3207 7918 Michelle Wilson +44 20 3465 2663 Tina Munda +44 20 3465 2716
Ross Law +44 20 3465 2692 John Klein +44 20 3207 7930
HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY
AUTOMOTIVES CONSTRUCTION Scott Bardo +44 20 3207 7869 Jean Beaubois +44 20 3207 7835
Adam Hull +44 20 3465 2749 Lush Mahendrarajah +44 20 3207 7896 Jakob Berry +44 20 3465 2724 Georgios Kertsos +44 20 3465 2715
Paul Kratz +44 20 3465 2678 Robert Muir +44 20 3207 7860 Alistair Campbell +44 20 3207 7876 Gal Munda +44 20 3465 2746
Olivia Peters +44 20 3465 2646 Graham Doyle +44 20 3465 2634 Tammy Qiu +44 20 3465 2673
BANKS Michael Watts +44 20 3207 7928 Klara Fernandes +44 20 3465 2718
Adam Barrass +44 20 3207 7923 Tom Jones +44 20 3207 7877 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
James Burbridge +44 20 3753 3014 ENERGY Louise Pearson +44 20 3465 2747 Ondrej Cabejsek (EM) +44 20 3753 3071
James Chappell +44 20 3207 7844 Yuriy Kukhtanych +44 20 3465 2675 Laura Sutcliffe +44 20 3465 2669 Usman Ghazi +44 20 3207 7824
Andrew Lowe +44 20 3465 2743 Siyi He +44 20 3465 2697
Eoin Mullany +44 20 3207 7854 FOOD MANUFACTURING AND H&PC INSURANCE Laura Janssens +44 20 3465 2639
Peter Richardson +44 20 3465 2681 Yordana Mavrodieva +44 20 3207 7817 Trevor Moss +44 20 3207 7893 Paul Marsch +44 20 3207 7857
Jonathan Sharpe +44 20 3753 3031 Fintan Ryan +44 20 3465 2748 Emanuele Musio +44 20 3207 7916 Michael Summerville +44 20 3207 7914
James Targett +44 20 3207 7873 Iain Pearce +44 20 3465 2665
BEVERAGES Sami Taipalus +44 20 3207 7866 THEMATIC RESEARCH
Javier Gonzalez Lastra +44 20 3465 2719 FOOD RETAIL Nick Anderson +44 20 3207 7838
Batuhan Karabekir (EM) +44 20 3465 2631 Batuhan Karabekir (EM) +44 20 3465 2631 LUXURY GOODS Chris Armstrong +44 20 3207 7809
Adam Mizrahi +44 20 3465 2653 Zuzanna Pusz +44 20 3207 7812 Asad Farid +44 20 3207 7932
GENERAL MID CAP - EU
BUSINESS SERVICES, LEISURE & TRANSPORT Gunnar Cohrs +44 20 3207 7894 MEDIA TOBACCO
Roberta Ciaccia +44 20 3207 7805 Martin Comtesse +44 20 3207 7878 Robert Berg +44 20 3465 2680 Jonathan Leinster +44 20 3465 2645
Najet El Kassir +44 20 3207 7836 Anna Patrice +44 20 3207 7863 Laura Janssens +44 20 3465 2639
Stuart Gordon +44 20 3207 7858 Simona Sarli +44 20 3207 7834 Alastair Reid +44 20 3207 7841 UTILITIES
Simon Mezzanotte +44 20 3207 7917 Julia Scheufler +44 20 3753 3016 Sarah Simon +44 20 3207 7830 Robin Abrams +44 20 3465 2635
Josh Puddle +44 20 3207 7881 Andrew Fisher +44 20 3207 7937
GENERAL MID CAP - UK METALS & MINING Lawson Steele +44 20 3207 7887
CAPITAL GOODS Robert Chantry +44 20 3207 7861 Alessandro Abate +44 20 3753 3029
Sebastian Kuenne +44 20 3207 7856 Sam England +44 20 3465 2687 Fawzi Hanano +44 20 3207 7910
Philippe Lorrain +44 20 3207 7823 Ned Hammond +44 20 3753 3017 Yuriy Vlasov +44 20 3465 2674 ECONOMICS
Rizk Maidi +44 20 3207 7806 Benjamin May +44 20 3465 2667 Carsten Hesse (EM) +44 20 3753 3001
Horace Tam +44 20 3465 2726 Owen Shirley +44 20 3465 2731 Kallum Pickering +44 20 3465 2672
Simon Toennessen +44 20 3207 7819 Holger Schmieding +44 20 3207 7889
EQUITY SALES E-mail: [email protected]
SPECIALIST SALES UK SWITZERLAND, AUSTRIA & ITALY PARIS
AEROSPACE & DEFENCE Alexandra Clément +44 20 3753 3018 Andrea Ferrari +41 44 283 2020 Vincent Klein +33 1 58 44 95 09
Bruna Zugliani +44 20 3207 7818 Fabian De Smet +44 20 3207 7810 Carsten Kinder +41 44 283 2024 Antonio Scuotto +33 1 58 44 95 03
AUTOMOTIVE & THEMATICS Toby Flaux +44 20 3465 2745 Gianni Lavigna +41 44 283 2038
Chris Armstrong +44 20 3207 7809 Karl Hancock +44 20 3207 7803 Jamie Nettleton +41 44 283 2026 TRADING
BANKS & DIVERSIFIED FINANCIALS Sean Heath +44 20 3465 2742 Benjamin Stillfried +41 44 283 2033 LONDON
Iro Papadopoulou +44 20 3207 7924 David Hogg +44 20 3465 2628 Edward Burlison-Rush +44 20 3753 3055
CONSUMER STAPLES Peter Kaineder +44 20 3753 3062 SALES TRADING Richard Kenny +44 20 3753 3083
Rupert Trotter +44 20 3207 7815 James Matthews +44 20 3207 7807 HAMBURG
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY David Mortlock +44 20 3207 7850 David Hohn +49 40 350 60 761 ELECTRONIC TRADING
Victoria Maigrot +44 20 3753 3010 Eleni Papoula +44 20 3465 2741 Gregor Labahn +49 40 350 60 571 Daniel Eichhorn +49 40 350 60 391
HEALTHCARE Bhavin Patel +44 20 3207 7926 Lennart Pleus +49 40 350 60 596 Matthias Führer +49 40 350 60 597
Frazer Hall +44 20 3207 7875 Richard Payman +44 20 3207 7825 Marvin Schweden +49 40 350 60 576
MEDIA & TELECOMMUNICATIONS George Smibert +44 20 3207 7911 Tim Storm +49 40 350 60 415 CRM
Julia Thannheiser +44 20 3465 2676 Anita Surana +44 20 3207 7855 Linus Weidner +49 40 350 60 798 Jessica Jarmyn +44 20 3465 2696
Paul Walker +44 20 3465 2632 Philipp Wiechmann +49 40 350 60 346 Edwina Lucas +44 20 3207 7908
Christoffer Winter +49 40 350 60 559 Greg Swallow +44 20 3207 7833
SALES FRANCE
BENELUX Thibault Bourgeat +33 1 5844 9505 LONDON CORPORATE ACCESS
Miel Bakker +44 20 3207 7808 Alexandre Chevassus +33 1 5844 9512 Mike Berry +44 20 3465 2755 Lindsay Arnold +44 20 3207 7821
Martin de Laet +44 20 3207 7804 Dalila Farigoule +33 1 5844 9510 Stewart Cook +44 20 3465 2752 Jennie Jiricny +44 20 3207 7886
Alexander Wace +44 20 3465 2670 Clémence Peyraud +33 1 5844 9521 Mark Edwards +44 20 3753 3004 Stella Siggins +44 20 3465 2630
Benjamin Voisin +33 1 5844 9507 Tristan Hedley +44 20 3753 3006
GERMANY Peter King +44 20 3753 3139 EVENTS
Michael Brauburger +49 69 91 30 90 741 SCANDINAVIA Christoph Kleinasser +44 20 3753 3063 Laura Hawes +44 20 3753 3008
Nina Buechs +49 69 91 30 90 735 Frederik Angel +44 20 3753 3055 Chris McKeand +44 20 3207 7938 Suzy Khan +44 20 3207 7915
André Grosskurth +49 69 91 30 90 734 Marco Weiss +49 40 350 60 719 Simon Messman +44 20 3465 2754 Charlotte Kilby +44 20 3207 7832
Florian Peter +49 69 91 30 90 740 AJ Pulleyn +44 20 3465 2756 Natalie Meech +44 20 3207 7831
Joerg Wenzel +49 69 91 30 90 743 Paul Somers +44 20 3465 2753 Ellen Parker +44 20 3465 2684
Sarah Weyman +44 20 3207 7801
US SALES SALES E-mail: [email protected]
BERENBERG CAPITAL MARKETS LLC Kelleigh Faldi +1 617 292 8288 SALES TRADING CRM
Member FINRA & SIPC Isabella Fantini +1 646 445 4861 Scott Duxbury +1 646 445 5573 Laura Cooper +1 646 445 7201
Shawna Giust +1 646 445 7216 Christopher Kanian +1 646 445 5576
Zubin Hubner +1 646 445 5572 Lars Schwartau +1 646 445 5571 CORPORATE ACCESS
Jessica London +1 646 445 7218 Bob Spillane +1 646 445 5574 Olivia Lee +1 646 445 7212
Ryan McDonnell +1 646 445 7214
Emily Mouret +1 415 802 2525 ECONOMICS
Peter Nichols +1 646 445 7204 Mickey Levy +1 646 445 4842
Kieran O'Sullivan +1 617 292 8292
