visual-motor integration (vmi) and graphomotor (handwriting) problems … · 2015-05-19 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015
1
Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) and Graphomotor (Handwriting)
Problems as a Barrier to Learning.
Julie Wiid
Difficulty in producing legible handwriting is so visible and yet is often overlooked and poorly
understood. Students who are reluctant to produce written work are often dismissed as ‘lazy’,
‘unmotivated, or ‘oppositional’ (Thorne, n.d). Mental, social and emotional inadequacies are
also often inferred from poor handwriting (Beery, 1997), yet for children with graphomotor
problems: “neat handwriting at a reasonable pace is often not a choice” (Thorne, n.d).
“Handwriting is the natural vehicle of teaching” (Beery, 1997). A child who can neither capture
work content adequately in written form nor produce written outputs that reflect her
understanding or verbal abilities therefore experiences significant barriers to learning.
VMI has been identified in
numerous studies as a more
important factor than general
intelligence, finger dexterity and
visual perception in determining
handwriting performance (Berry,
1997, Tseng & Murray 1994, Weil
& Armundson, 1994, Williams et al,
1993, in Beery, 1997).
VMI is: “the degree to which visual perception and
finger-hand movements are well coordinated” (Beery,
1997). Through integration of visual input and motor
output, motor tasks (e.g. writing) are planned,
executed, monitored (Visual Integration Skills, n.d )
and adjusted (Visual Motor Integration, n.d). While
VMI may therefore be affected by deficits in visual
perception and/or motor coordination, some children
with adequate visual perceptual and motor co-
ordination skills still perform poorly in VMI
assessments (Kulp, Mazzola & Mazzola, 2003),
suggesting that VMI “ is greater than the sum of its
parts” (Beery, 1997) and that “the hyphen in visual-
motor” (Beery, 1997) represents the integrated
complexity of interactions between factors such as
cognition, visual perception, shoulder stability
(Calder, 2010) ; proprioception, directionality and
planning (van der Zee, 2010); and fine motor control,
co-ordination and psychomotor speed (Sanghavi,
2005).
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 2
In considering this definition of VMI and the developmental objectives of the primitive
reflexes (Appendix 1), it can be seen that development of VMI is dependent upon the
inhibition of these reflexes. Wilkinson’s study (1994, in Goddard-Blythe, 2001) identified
primitive reflexes as a contributing factor to learning disabilities and underachievement.
Furthermore, children with learning disabilities have a high prevalence of VMI deficiencies
(Beery, 1997; Tranopol in Sanghavi, 2005; Visual Integration Skills, n.d.). Underachievement
may, in many cases, therefore be a direct result of inability to produce adequate written
outputs for accurate assessment of progress.
VMI manifests in graphomotor problems as difficulties in:
Spatial organisation on paper
Letter/number formation
Following/staying in lines
Alignment e.g. numbers in columns
Recognising mistakes
Pencil grip and desk posture
(Visual Integration Skills, n.d)
Poor spatial organisation on
paper (positioning of name);
poor letter formation
(approx 6yrs 3 months)
Difficulty in drawing on lines; poor spatial
organisation; poor number formation
(approx 6 yrs 2 months)
Poor spatial organisation of
written output
(approx 6 yrs 11 months)
Fig1: Examples of written outputs exhibiting typical characteristics of poor VMI – Occupational
Therapy commenced when child was 5years 8 months and specific reflex inhibition interventions
commenced at the age of 7 years and 2 months
Note midline crossing
Note: due to poor pencil grip some lines were too light to be reproduced. They have therefore been
darkened and so do not reflect the child’s pencil grip in terms of pressure applied to paper.
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 3
The ability to copy basic shapes ( / \ X ) is a prerequisite
for writing (Van der Zee, 2010) and an indication of the extent to which an individual’s visual
and motor abilities have been integrated (Beery & Buktenica, 1997) ( Figure 2).
Fig 2: Comparison of performance over time on the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration
(Beery and Buktenica, 2005) to illustrate development of VMI ability plus changes in drawn and
written output with development of VMI
Geometric form to be copied
Developmental Test of Visual
Motor Integration Items 4-6
( Beery & Buktenica, 2005)
Age 5years 8 months
Age 6years 7 months
Age 8years 2 months
Geometric form to be copied
Developmental Test of Visual
Motor Integration Items 7-9
( Beery & Buktenica, 2005)
Age 5years 8 months
Age 6years 7 months
Age 8years 2 months
Intended to draw
a square
Application of
developing skill in
drawing tasks
Note: Test not administered for assessment purposes at 8 yrs 2 months, but only for comparative purposes as
illustration for the topic of this essay. The child completed the task in test conditions.
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 4
Fig 2: Continued
Geometric form to be copied
Developmental Test of Visual
Motor Integration Items 13-15
( Beery & Buktenica, 2005)
Age 5years 8 months
Age 6years 7 months
Age 8years 2 months
Geometric form to be copied
Developmental Test of Visual
Motor Integration Items 10-12
( Beery & Buktenica, 2005)
Age 5years 8 months
Age 6years 7 months
Age 8years 2 months
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 5
Figure 2: Continued
Geometric form to be copied
Developmental Test of Visual
Motor Integration Items 16-18
( Beery & Buktenica, 2005)
Age 5years 8 months
Age 6years 7 months
Age 8years 2 months
Comparison of skills required for reproduction of such shapes with reflex-driven development
further highlights the importance of primitive reflexes in development of VMI and thus
graphomotor abilities (Appendix 2).
It is observed, however, that even when handwriting skills develop, the discrepancy between
written and verbal skills may remain marked as production of written words to reflect
thoughts appears to be at the expense of flow and correctness of content and sentence
structure (Figure 3).
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 6
Power On Rub the indentation just below the collar bone in line with the left eye. This move re-establishes the electrical flow via the Vagus nerve to the speech organs and stomach to help relax butterflies and talk with ease. It switches the brain ON for improved concentration without anxiety.
This suggests that representing thoughts and ideas through handwriting (i.e. written output
driven by thought/language as opposed to copying, but monitored and corrected using VMI)
entails more complex processing. If, however, production of legible, meaningful handwriting
is an indication of improved VMI abilities, it is surely also an indicator that the reflex-driven
neurodevelopment required to support development of higher, more complex processes is
becoming established. The development of graphomotor abilities is therefore the
fundamental starting point for production of written output.
USING MIND MOVES® TO DESIGN A HOME PROGRAMME TO ADDRESS GRAPHOMOTOR
PROBLEMS DUE TO POOR VMI ABILITIES
Graphomotor problems and their impact are highly visible and resulting low self-esteem/self-
confidence and behaviours associated with physical and emotional immaturity present
additional barriers to learning.
As graphomotor skills require VMI and VMI is dependent upon inhibition of primitive reflexes,
a home programme based upon a ‘bottom-up and ‘top –down’ approach in parallel is to be
most effective.
The ‘bottom-up approach’ refers to systematic identification and inhibition of aberrant
reflexes, starting with the earliest aberrant reflex in the developmental order and progressing
up through the order to develop the essential sensory-motor neural pathways and
interconnections between the physical, emotional and cognitive brains. This is achieved
through specific Mind Moves exercises mimicking reflexive movements and additional
activities to stimulate the appropriate senses and muscles. The objective of developing these
pathways and interconnections is to build a solid neural foundation for sustained skill
development.
The ‘top-down’ approach incorporates Mind Moves exercises to ‘prime’ existing pathways to
support production of an output in class. As the output here would be legible, meaningful
handwriting, the following exercises would be recommended (De Jager, 2010):
Rise and Shine Fling the arms wide open while breathing in deeply and slowly. Close the arms over the chest in a hug, breathe out deeply and slowly. The parent may simultaneously hug from behind. This move boosts relaxation, rhythmic breathing and a sense of wellbeing.
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 7
Bilateral integrator
Move the arms in a mirror image as though conducting a choir. This is a
fun way to develop rhythm, eye-hand coordination, focal and peripheral
vision, left and right integration in preparation for fluent speaking,
reading and writing.
Finger fight
Push the forefinger against the thumb, maintaining the pressure for a count of
eight, then let go. Repeat for each finger. This move differentiates the parts of the
hands. It also improves muscle tone in both hands, penmanship, fine motor
control and communication skills.
Palm stretch
Extend the fingers as wide as possible for a count of eight, then relax. Make a tight
fist, hold for a count of eight, relax. This move improves muscle tone in the hands,
penmanship, fine motor control and bilateral integration. It also promotes fluent
speech.
Mousepad
Visual Workout
Bi-lateral Walk
Movement moulds the brain. Repetition makes it effective
Melodie de Jager
Move with purpose, move with Mind Moves! Beery, K, Buktenica, N 1997. Developmental Test for Visual Motor Integration: New Jersey. Modern Curriculum Press Calder, C. 2010 Visual and Sensory Perception: An Occupational Therapy Perspective. Presentation – Seeing Your Way to Reading (SAALED). 11 /09/10 De Jager, M. 2009 Mind Moves Advanced Instructor Training Course Manual. Linden Johannesburg. Mind Moves Institute De Jager, M. 2010. Mind Moves – moves that mend the mind. Johannesburg: Mind Moves Institute. Goddard Blythe, S. 2001. Neurological Dysfunction as a Significant Factor in Children Diagnosed With Dyslexia. Paper presented at the 5th BDA International Conference. [online]. http://www.bdainternational conference.org/2001/presentations/sat_s1_a_1.htm [accessed 10 August 2010] Kulp, M, Mazzola S, Mazzola, J 2003. Clinical Value of the Beery Visual Motor Integration Supplement Tests of Visual Perception and Motor Integration. Optometry and Vision Science April 2003 – Volume 80 Issue 4: 312-315 Sanghavi, R, Kelkar, R, 2005 Visual Motor Integration and Learning Disabled Children. Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. XXXVII: No 2: 33-2 [accessed 17 July 2010]. Thorne, G. n.d.. Graphomotor Skills – Why Some Kids Hate to Write. [online]. www.icdl.org/resource-library/articles/graphomotor.php [accessed 10 August 2010]. Van der Zee, F. 2010. Occupational Therapy Report (August 2010) and Discussion Visual Integration Skills. n.d. [online]. http://www.visionand learning.org/visualintegration.html [accessed 04 July 2010] Visual Motor Integration. n.d. [online]. http://www.childrensvision.com/reading.htm [accessed 17 September 2009.)
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 8
APPENDIX 1: Developmental objectives of intra-uterine, primitive and bridging reflexes
REFLEX DEVELOPMENTAL OBJECTIVE
Sensory Brain Muscle
Withdrawal Touch Proprioception
Receptive/back
Moro Vestibular system (balance) Kinesis Auditory
Receptive/back Expressive/front
Entire motor system
Rooting and Sucking
Olfactory Gustatory Primitive vision
Receptive/back Emotional/bottom
Neck Mouth
Tonic Labyrinthine
Vestibular system Auditory Primitive vision
Receptive/back Expressive/front Emotional/bottom Cognitive/top
Neck Core
Palmar Touch Receptive/back Expressive/front Left and Right Cognitive
Hands Fingers Fine Motor
Plantar Touch Receptive/back Expressive/front Left and Right Cognitive
Feet- balance and weight bearing Gross and fine motor
Asymmetrical Tonic Neck
Vestibular system Vision and sight
Receptive/back Cognitive/top
Neck Core Limbs Eye – hand Head stability
Spinal Galant Touch Hearing - vibrational
Receptive/back Expressive/front Emotional/bottom Cognitive/top
Core Trunk rotation
Symmetric Tonic Neck
Balance Vision
Receptive/back Expressive/front Emotional/bottom Cognitive/top
Neck Core – flexion and extension Shoulder Hip
(De Jager, 2009)
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 9
APPENDIX 2: Alignment of reflexive development with the ability to copy basic shapes as
pre-requisite skills for writing as illustrated using Beery & Buktenica’s Development Tests of
Visual-Motor Integration (1997)
Ability to hold a pencil and organise output on paper are assumed
Directionality required for all below: near sensory system – Withdrawal, Moro, TLR,
ATNR, STNR
Basic Shape
Comment Reflex-driven developmental
requirement
Vertical line easier to draw than
Directionality - up and down; away from/towards Cross horizontal midline TLR
Horizontal line
Directionality – left /right; away from /toward Laterality Cross vertical midline ATNR
Children <6yrs tend to draw away from self – perception that centre of universe. 6 + yrs – draw circle from top towards body – left/right centre seems to be forehead i.e. top brain – corresponds with development of bi-lateral integration
Directionality – away from/toward Proprioception and balance Withdrawal, Moro, TLR, ATNR, STNR
4-6 year olds – horizontal line weaker than vertical line. Frequent segmenting of horizontal midline at midline.
Directionality Laterality& Bilaterality Crossing of horizontal and vertical midlines TLR, ATNR
Develop later because requires co-ordination of vertical and horizontal movement and midline crossing Typically left to right mastered before right to left
Directionality Laterality & Bilaterality Crossing of horizontal and vertical midlines TLR, ATNR
First form requiring drawing in one direction, stop, then change direction. Requires perception of spatial relations among sides. Required to draw vertical and horizontal lines, see corners and organise the components as such. A tendency to therefore circularize is therefore common in older children
Directionality Laterality & Bilaterality Crossing of horizontal and vertical midlines TLR, ATNR
©Mind Moves Institute, Johannesburg. 2015 10
Basic Shape
Comment Reflex-driven developmental
requirement
X
Vertical and horizontal lines and oblique lines in each direction must be mastered to produce this shape
Directionality Laterality & Bilaterality Crossing of horizontal and vertical midlines TLR, ATNR
Co-ordination of oblique lines Tendency to circularize if this not mastered
Directionality Laterality & Bilaterality Crossing of horizontal and vertical midlines TLR, ATNR