visitors are coming to our class.. october 17, 2006 –seth donahue, engineering –bruce seely,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Visitors are coming to our class..
• October 17, 2006– Seth Donahue, Engineering– Bruce Seely, Social Sciences– Victor Busov, Forestry
• October 31, 2006– Dave Reed, VP for Research– Anita Quinn, Director of Research Services– Lisa Jukkala, Research Services– Jackie Huntoon, Graduate School– Pete Larsen, Research Services
INTRODUCTION
• First 1-2 pages described what research activity you want to pursue
• You told reviewers your objectives and how you plan to achieve them
• You told them about the methods
• You told them about significance
• Now they are hooked and hungry for more!
Background information
• Why? • Because they should know what do you know! • Start from broad topics and narrow down to
specifics of your proposal• Review of literature: know difference between
thesis, publications & proposal• You want to show them your depth of knowledge
and understanding of the current literature and research trends
• Build your story on the basis of what is known!
References
• How many are too many?• Depends on your field• Use 30-40 best ones that serve YOU the best!• Give some popular review articles (recent)• Don’t say: Recently in 1955…• Cite leaders, old-timers and little people too• Ego trip! So let some ride on it too (no attacks!)• Cite those who support your train of thoughts
Background informationAssignment for the next class
• Write background section (3-4 pages)
• Develop logical flow of ideas published in the literature
• Cite relevant publications
• Use both recent and old citations
• Submit e-copy to Megan and hard copy to me in the class
This Thursday..
• Come prepared to discuss among your peers my successful and unsuccessful NSF proposals kept at our class site.
• Bring written points on– What did you like about them?– What did you dislike about them?– What activity is proposed?– Why you think one succeeded and other failed?
• Submit to me at the end of the class• Read and discuss one pager that your peers have
submitted to me.• You will get one-two more proposals in email soon.
Five things Reviewers look for before they even think about
reading your proposal• Who is proposing it? CV and support..
• Where are you coming from?
• How much are you asking?
• What is the title of your proposal?
• What activity you are proposing: Summary
How to submit a NSF proposal?
• Electronic via FASTLANE
• Reach there by Deadline but don’t wait till last minute (Target date?)
• How it is processed at NSF
• Three major steps to survive the first cut– Read the instructions– Read the instructions– Read the instructions
Project Description• Format
– Pagination: You do it just before submission– 15 page limit– Previous NSF grants (max 5 pages)– 10 points or larger font– Density 15 characters per 2.5 cm– 6 lines per 2.5 cm vertical space– margins in all directions 2.5 cm– My suggested font will be Times New Roman 12 point– References not included in the 15 page limit– But figures and tables are..
What if I do not follow these guidelines?
How can I use all the space that I got?
• Leave some blank space for aesthetic purpose. Solid page is hard to read!
• Use some figures and pictures to break the monotony. (Color better!) (But no clip arts, please)
• Show one diagram of interrelationship among various proposal components
• Explain the figures/tables that you put there!• Personalize proposal with your unique style!
– Picture/figure on the first page may be better
Don’t forget the basics • Grammar, spellings and style counts!• Use Bold, underline, and bullets to draw attention (1 of 3)• Write each paragraph so that it builds on the preceding
paragraph. Make your ideas connect and flow. Each new paragraph is a step toward the final paragraph to solve the problem. Each new paragraph adds excitement and urgency of doing proposed work (Bev Browning)
• You should answer every question that comes next to your mind when you read your own narrative
• Limit flowery words to three-four in the entire proposal• This is not a story although it should read like one.• They should not stop reading and go back and forth• Touch their heart, mind and intellect and wallet!• Always start fresh..
What is the goal? What are the main objectives?
• Goal: one sentence statement about the END that one strives to attain
• Objectives: attainable milestones or checkpoints to be achieved to know how far are we from our goal?
• A Timetable is must!
• Use active words: will be established, proven, discovered..
How will we submit the proposals for this class?
• I have already formed five peer groups of 5-6 students.
• All the assignments will be circulated among peers from your group.
• Everyone is expected to give input to each other• Forms will be kept on my website. You download
them, fill them up and submit to me by e-mail.• The final proposal will be a single, collated
document in the pdf format that will go to your peer group, outside evaluators and professors for grading.
How will proposals be evaluated?• We will use the same two criteria that NSF uses (Read
GPG).• Intellectual merit
– How important for advancement of knowledge?– Qualification of PI and quality of proposal?– Creative and original concepts? – How well conceived and organized is this activity?– Sufficient resources available?
• Broader impacts– Advance discovery and understanding– Can promote teaching and research integration– Diversity (gender, ethnicity, disability, geographical)– Infrastructure development– Dissemination of information obtained – What is the benefit to society?
Grant Proposal Writing
Valorie Troesch’s top 10 Don’ts
No!
No!
No!
No!No!
No!
No!No!
No! No!
Top 10 Don’ts
10Don’t wait until the last
minute.
Top 10 Don’ts
9.Don’t ignore or
undervaluethe boring parts:
management plan
education & outreach
project evaluation, etc.
This is boring and it isn’t my
area of expertise.
Who will care anyway if I
omit it?
8.Don’t ignore any instructions in
the RFP.
Request for
Proposals
Instructions
Do this
Do that
Mail to
Email to
Sections required
Page limits
Margin & font sizes
Etc.
Top 10 Don’ts
7.
Don’t lie. Don’t plagiarize.
Top 10 Don’ts
6.Don’t promise something that
you can’t deliver.
I sure hope I can do this.
Well, miracles do
happen!
Top 10 Don’ts
5.Don’t try to cram
everything but the kitchen sink
into your proposal.
Top 10 Don’ts
4.Don’t ever say “it
is obvious” or “it is apparent.”
Assume that nothing is obvious or apparent.
It is obvious that…..
Top 10 Don’ts
Top 10 Don’ts
3.Don’t have any misspelled words
or grammatical errors
Dictionary
Top 10 Don’ts
2.Don’t ignore the reviewers’
comments
Top 10 Don’ts
1.Don’t give up!
You can’t win if you don’t enter!
My top 10 Do’s
Top 10 Do’s
10.Do develop a good idea that someone will want to fund
Top 10 Do’s
9.Do start early &
allow enough time to write a good proposal
Top 10 Do’s
8.Do ask for and use
available help:• Program Officers• Colleagues• University resources• Reviewer comments• Prior awardees
Top 10 Do’s
7.Do learn to accept
criticism.
Do use constructive
criticism wisely.
That idiot doesn’t know
anything!!!!!
Now that’s a good
idea. I’ll try that.
Top 10 Do’s
6.Do understand about “goals,”“objectives,” and “activities.”
Activities
The “to do” list
Chronological order
Objectives
What you want to achieve in the short-term
Immediate results from your project
Goals
Long-term changes or contributions of your project.
The BIG PICTURE things
Top 10 Do’s
5.Do understand the goals of the
funding agency.
NSF’s goals
Your project
Top 10 Do’s
4.Do show your
passion.
Top 10 Do’s
3.
Do sell yourself and your product.
2. Do make your proposal as easy and as pleasant to read as possible for the reviewers:
well-organized 1st person and direct sentences pleasing to the eye: lots of white space;
use diagrams, tables, and pictures but keep them simple
read it aloud and have others critically read it
make your abstract as good as it can be Highlight the review criteria so reviewers
don’t miss them
This Not this
Top 10 Do’s
1.1.
Be an Be an optimist!optimist!