visible thinking: using contemporary art to teach conceptual skills
TRANSCRIPT
National Art Education Association
Visible Thinking: Using Contemporary Art to Teach Conceptual SkillsAuthor(s): Julia MarshallSource: Art Education, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Mar., 2008), pp. 38-45Published by: National Art Education AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27696275 .
Accessed: 16/06/2014 04:12
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
National Art Education Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ArtEducation.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
I
m
TOUIVCH
|?lf||?l?;? III -the cotMiaai* wv?*"*"
FcmuAiiv i. aooa
MUaSB
JPHL lliillllllll
rary art offers us a wide array of
genres, media, and methods for making art. It could be said that today art is richer, more varied, and more increasingly challenging than ever before. Moreover, current art seems to reveal
more of the conceptual or cognitive processes involved in creating art than historical art.
Wang Du.
Tapis Volant-Time (2002-2003). 102
square meters: about 9.50 x 11 m. New Wool of New Zealand, hand woven.
Courtesy of Galerie Laurent Godin, Paris.
ART EDUCATION / MARCH 2008
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
I have in mind a particular type of
contemporary art?the kind that not
only puts ideas and concepts into visual form but also reveals the
thought processes by which that form was conceived. These works make the
thinking (or cognition) behind their ideas and forms visible; they are easily seen in the form of the work. In
allowing us to see the conceptual strategies behind them, these works make these processes accessible,
teachable, and lear able. Students can
see, learn, and use these processes for
generating statements in their own art.
Students can also come to understand
the conceptual strategies behind less
transparent works of art and the
images of visual culture. On a broader,
deeper note, the artworks presented here can help students to understand how the mind conceives and shapes its
interpretations of reality.
Why is developing cognitive skills in art important? In a time when art is under siege in schools, many art
educators justify the inclusion of art in education by
arguing that art practice involves higher level thinking (Efland, 2002; Eisner, 2002; Dorn, 1999; Freedman,
2003a; Roland, 1992). These theorists claim that making and critiquing art can help students to think more
deeply, broadly, and critically, to interpret and under
stand meanings, and to create meaning. In fore
grounding the cognitive/conceptual component of art, the contemporary works discussed here reinforce this
argument. Roland (1992) recounted two specific kinds of
learning developed through making and viewing art:
'declarative knowledge (knowledge of content) and
procedural knowledge (knowledge of how to apply that
content). Roland (1992) implied that learning how to
apply knowledge is as important as learning the 'facts.'
In foregrounding the how of art making, these artworks can help students to develop procedural knowledge. Furthermore, their transparency can help to build awareness and understanding of those processes. Erickson (2005) and (Haskell, 2001) referred to this
understanding as 'strategic knowledge'. Strategic
knowledge is often referred to as 'metacognition and it is
understood to be a critical factor in higher-level learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000; Efland, 2002;
Roland, 1992). While metacognition is critical to learning in all
disciplines, understanding what you are doing in working with
techniques, materials, design principles and with ideas is an
especially important goal of art education. When students are
directed to the processes behind these contemporary works,
metacognition is fostered.
Our challenge as educators is to locate the works of art that make
process visible, mine the strategies they use and reveal, and
provide art-making exercises in which students practice these
strategies. This article is intended to facilitate these efforts. Some
examples of current art are presented. This is a small sample; once you start looking at new art with these strategies in mind,
you will notice that these works represent a trend. Also included
is a lesson that illustrates one way to use these examples of
Visible thinking in contemporary art to catalyze connection
making or concept development.
Two Strategies for Creating and Communicating Concepts I focus here on two strategies or modes of thought for developing
concepts and meaning: metaphor and conceptual collage. These
strategies are distinct from each other in many ways but they also
overlap. Both are ways of creating concepts, meaning and new
ways of thinking through developing connections or relation
ships. These two strategies are fundamental mental processes;
they are how the mind conceives and understands its experience and the world it encounters (Stafford, 1999; Lakoff & Johnson,
1980).
Conceptual Collage (juxtaposing non-coalescent or
distinct images). Collage is the juxtaposition of images or ideas
to create new meaning. In art, a collage is created when visible, material images are placed together and their arrangement
generates a relationship between them. This relationship often
not only expresses a concept or idea but also creates it (Stafford,
1999). Conceptual collage is a variation on this idea; it occurs not
on paper through physical manipulation of visible images but in
the mind. Stanford (1999) argued that the mind develops
concepts and makes meaning by juxtaposing ideas and images and making connections between them. She also argued that
artists make these conceptual collages' visible when they make
art, no matter what material or technique they use. She argued that to make these processes visible, artists use non-coalescent
images, images that remain distinct and recognizable.
'Conceptual collaging is not necessarily placing one image next
to another but also can involve projecting one image onto
another. When this placement is novel and surprising, it causes
the viewer to see the concept in a different light. Often collage works through contrast and dissonance; the images do not fit
and the relationship shocks. This is the basis of irony. Many of
the examples presented in this article are ironic; they use shock
and humor to expose concepts or present concepts in a different
light and they emphasize paradoxes and incongruities.
JULIA MARSHALL/ VISIBLE THINKING 39
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Metaphor?seeing one entity in terms of
another. Metaphor is another way to
generate meaning. A metaphor describes one
thing?the primary subject?in terms of
another?the subsidiary subject (Black,
1981). The primary and subsidiary subjects have something in common, which makes
the connection 'fit,' but they are also quite different. It is the differences between the two entities that change the way we see the
primary subject. For example, when Carl
Sandburg (1913) described fog (the primary subject) in terms of a cat (the subsidiary subject) in his poem Fog, all the associations
we have with cats (such as soft, fuzzy, quiet, and stealthy) are applied to fog. Using 'cat' instead of all these descriptive words is a very economical way to describe fog. Metaphor is
particularly powerful because it often creates
connections we did not see before (Lakoff& Johnson, 1980). Once the metaphor is made, it changes the way we see things. Fog becomes forever connected to cats. Although
metaphor is usually associated with words, visual metaphors work in the same way. Indeed, visual metaphors, because they use
visual images, are particularly powerful in
this regard (Marshall, 2004; Ricoeur, 1991).
Examples of Art Here are some specific artworks that use
collage and metaphor and demonstrate
clearly how these conceptual strategies work.
The collages and metaphors in these works
are not only visible but also provocative. The
contrasts and collisions are shocking and/or
funny. In many cases, these works appear to
be one-liners* similar to political cartoons.
The strategies of juxtaposition, decontextual
ization, and blending are easy to see. What
sets these works apart from cartoons are the
associations and implications that evolve
after the initial encounter. Collage, metaphor and the subject itself make these messages
complex and multidimensional. These are
not simple statements, but complex state
ments made simply. In them, a concept is
illuminated and opened to multiple questions and interpretations.
All of these works comment on current
critical socio-cultural issues, specifically
globalization and violence. I also see one
overarching theme in these works?the
power and pervasiveness of visual images. Each of these artworks comments or relies
on the way visual imagery can pack a lot of
meaning. The images are iconic in that they represent complex meanings distilled down
into one image. The works also juxtapose
highly contrasting iconic images to make
their point. With all their humor and irony, which betray a great deal of cynicism toward their subjects, these artists still maintain faitl
in the power of imagery and art to generate awareness and change perceptions. Their use
of art as a scalpel to penetrate and reveal
complex realities attests to this.
Tapis Volant (Flying Carpet) (2002) by Wang Du (China, France). Contemporary artist Wang Du addresses the global mass
media and how it shapes or distorts events
and truth in his art. In his Tapis Volant,
Wang Du juxtaposed contemporary
global media imagery with time-honored
traditional forms. This ironic arrange ment contrasts old and new, decorative
art and visual culture. In this piece, the
Time magazine cover announcing the
explosion of the Columbia space shuttle is
transformed into a Chinese carpet. In placing the announcement of this shocking and
tragic event as a design on a carpet, Wang Du
alludes to how such events provide another
image that 'decorates our lives. The concept here is the numbness and disconnection that
constant exposure to an image, no matter
how horrific, generates in its audience.
Han Dynasty Urn with Coca-Cola Logo (1995) by Ai Weiwei (China). Ai Weiwei
places the Coca Cola Label on an ancient
Chinese artwork, a Han Dynasty urn. This
juxtaposition creates a simple, visual image that communicates the concept of cultural
collision?the replacement of old Confucian
values by capitalism and consumerism in
contemporary China. Ai Weiwei s vision of
this is rather cynical. Consumerism and
globalization replace ancient ideals and
principles, and old relics become consumer
commodities. L
Twilight of the Idols 8 (2002) by Kendell Geers (South Africa, Belgium). Kendell Geers uses a similar strategy in his series of
power figures, Twilight of the Idols. In these works, the artist bound traditional African
figurative ritual objects, in this case a Nkisi
power figure from central Africa, in red and
white chevron tape to create a jarring
juxtaposition of the old, spiritual, and
:M^!$m$i\Nart Dynasty with Coca i Co/a Logo (1995). Courtesy Galerie :
Urs Meile. Beijing-Lucerne.
Kendell Geers. Twilight of the Idols # 8 (2002). Courtesy of the artist
and Stephen Friedman Gallery London, Galler?a Continua-San : ??m?gnano, Yvonne lamb?rt ;
G?ilery-?>arr?s. 'i
:ft 4B: Gabriel Kuri. Uniffl?d (Superama) (2003). Hand woven
gobelin. 114 x 44 in. (289.6 x ? 1.8
cm). Collection of Contemporary Art San Diego.Museum purchase with
funds from Museum of
Contemporary Art San ?igf?A-, ; ̂ ti?ftftt Art Auction, 2?0t?? =
? 2003 Gabriel Kuri. Courtesy of the : "artist and the Museum of
Contemporary Art San Diego.
40 ART EDUCATION / MARCH 2008
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
V _V.
U k
jr,?
Mt if.; jr, 1 II If A
t% IN= Fly .1 .1 .31 !I
% M-M. i j,
. . . . . . .:n wIll .1 1V
.;Rff 0 nll .1
ilk Beirut.
S.! j: !k
AL. Am =T
M
11,;:; :j 4 g, 1. ul M.
at
T
-Q Ji N T MP AA
V 1, u tt
T'
i't ?14_ i. ";W5 24" ;mrl :,t 2 ......
11
:g;
7 .
-i i-4i; 1,
FM U-N
?"
venerable with the new, cheap, and industrial. Concepts related to spirituality in today's world emerge from this
powerful 'collage' of image and materials. Geers opened these topics up to the questions: Are contemporary
capitalism and global culture replacing spiritual traditions with consumerism? Is global consumerism
the new power?with the strength to change deeply held values and revise reality? Has an indigenous spirituality been bound and gagged by this pervasive power?
Superama ( 2003) by Gabriel Kuri (Mexico). Gabriel Kuri addresses new economic and cultural realities in
the NAFTA-created world. In his Superama, he
displayed a Wal-Mart receipt as a decorative pattern on
a hand-woven rug. This is a good example of superim
posing a common iconic image from contemporary
global culture onto a traditional handmade form to
communicate a concept and comment on its effect?
in this case the overwhelming power of global corpora tions to overtake and undermine local communities and
economies, and to replace local indigenous patterns with global capitalistic ones.
Fragment Grenades (1997) by Charles Krafft (USA). In his witty, satirical ceramic sculptures, Charles Krafft
comments on the comfort level many people have today with weapons, violence, and disasters. His Fragment Grenades consists of six white porcelain hand grenades decorated with cobalt blue designs from the venerable tradition of Delft ceramics. In creating weapon-shaped knick-knacks, Krafft points out the banality and
ordinariness of violence in American life. Weapons become collectibles, both beautiful and kitschy. Like
plates and cups, these weapons once had uses. Now they are inert and they commemorate, domesticate, and
prettify violence.
Charles Krafft. Fragment Grenades (\9&f)* Courtesy of DiRT Gallery/ Los Angeles.
JULIA MARSHALL/ VISIBLE THINKING 41
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Familiar Songbirds 11 (2002) by Michael Oatman (USA). Michael Oatmans collage of
songbirds wearing helmets and
carrying machine guns
displays humor and cynicism similar to Charles Krafft s. In
this startling juxtaposition, cute, cuddly, playful creatures
become deadly fighters and metaphors for an increasingly militarized society where even
natures cutest most innocent
creatures are violent. Oatmans strategy works especially well
because these lovable but menacing creatures are rendered in
the sentimental style associated with images from popular 1950s American magazines. This simple but powerful combina
tion generates questions about the way humans romanticize and
anthropomorphize nature and militarize it.
Top: Michael Oatman. Familiar
Songbirds 2 (2002). Courtesy of Miller Block Gallery.
Above, left: ? Tirso Gonzalez. Abu Ghraib Plate (2005). Handmade ceramic. Courtesy of the artist.
Above, middle: Rachel Hallquist. George W. Bush Garden Gnome (2005). Courtesy of the artist.
Above, right: Susannah Morgan. Skull
(2005). Courtesy of the artist.
42 ART EDUCATION / MARCH 2008
A Sample Lesson: Simple Steps to Complex
This lesson took place in our preservice art education course at San
Francisco State University. The artwork presented here is by future high school and middle school teachers. The lesson began with conceptual
collage, and many of the works evolved into metaphorical images or
objects. This lesson worked because it was supported by clear examples of
collage and metaphor from contemporary art and specified clear unam
biguous steps for using or developing these strategies. Along with
facilitating conceptual processes, students also practiced their research
skills and learned techniques such as clay construction and the transfer of
images onto clay (drawing and painting with underglazes).
(1) The lesson began with each student choosing an issue to be addressed
and a primary image that represents that issue. Looking through news magazines and newspapers for current political and social
issues helped students to locate an issue to explore and an image to use.
(2) The instructor then presented examples of contemporary artwork
discussed in this article that employ conceptual collage and metaphor and facilitated a discussion of these strategies. The notion of the
subsidiary subject or medium was introduced and students came to
understand how the interaction between the primary image and the
medium develops and communicates a concept.
(3) The instructor then offered many options for the subsidiary form or
medium. In this particular lesson, we limited the medium to
ceramics and showed ceramic forms ranging from ancient artifacts
and decorative arts to contemporary souvenirs and kitsch. Students
were also instructed to research and find clay forms and traditions on
their own.
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Meanings
(4) After each student chose a conventional or traditional form for her/his subsidiary form or medium, she/he made an object out of clay. To facilitate this, the instructor demonstrated an
array of hand-building techniques. Students merged their primary image with the medium
through blending the two in the construction of the object or in placing the primary image onto the medium object. The instructor demonstrated drawing and painting with underglazes to help with this process.
For the most part, students had concepts in mind before they began their work but often the
concepts took on new life and meaning as they developed into material or visible form. The
following examples of student work illustrate how this works. The explanations presented here are
my interpretations of these pieces.
Abu Ghraib Plate by Tirso Gonzales. In this work, an iconic image from the Iraq war is ringed by Arabic designs and calligraphy and projected onto a plate. This piece shocks us with its highly charged juxtaposition of a real image of misery and cruelty and a common domestic or decorative
object. In it, the artist comments on the power of visual images. This concept of power can be
interpreted in two differing ways. As a picture on a commemorative plate, the image is diminished; it becomes a souvenir of a faraway
(HOB artists opinion of Mr. Bush. In his
cuddling of a weapon, she alludes to Bush's embrace of militancy. She also addresses the concept of Mr. Bush's split public personality and asks the question: Is Mr. Bush just an ornamental figure? Is he as powerful as he wants us to
believe? Or as folksy? This is the opposite of a power figure. The artist challenges Mr. Bush's
authority, symbolically disempowering her subject.
Skull by Susannah Morgan. In this piece, the artist presents her impression of current practices in
psychiatry that promote the use of drugs for controlling mental illnesses. To convey her concepts, she chose a ceramic head marked with a phrenology map of the mind as her medium image and
updated that mind-map by replacing phrenology titles for areas of the brain with names of popular drugs for depression. She also replaced the rather neutral head used in the conventional phre
nology bust with a skull. Her superimposition of current medical practices onto an old science of
the mind relates new psychiatric practices to old discredited practices, evoking concepts of
superstition and uselessness.
JULIA MARSHALL/ VISIBLE THINKING 43
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
War on Terror Game (2005). ****??J I ^P^^^ft-^P.JbHHHHP'"^^ Daniel Spinka, Sarah Steiner, B^wBHI^^^H^^k w*BKtK?E?fr~Ali. J^d?l^hriH^B'' and Kyra Rice. J^BhIS^II^^HHHLJ _j^^^?^;:;;:,:.!
' ?lr "-:JbB^^^W^mB?
A version of this lesson was done in another preservice course for high school and middle school teachers. In this
case, students worked in groups. The war in Iraq and the
war on terror were chosen as themes, and the medium
forms students used for conveying concepts were
souvenirs and games. Two artworks stand out for their
irony and for the way they illustrate so clearly the two
conceptual strategies of collage and metaphor. The Iraq Souvenir Pack with a decorative box displaying bottles of
'sand, blood, oil, water and culture is an ironic comment
on what the artists see as the real motives behind the war
and an excellent example of collage. The second artwork
War on Terror: The Game uses the metaphor of a board
game to describe the war on terror, mapping out all the
territories, the players, the tactics and the rules of this
deadly contest.
This lesson and artwork represent a common
practice in contemporary art that illuminates
critical social and cultural issues through the
contrasting and combining of iconic images. In
this case, the images are from historical tradi
tions and current popular culture. This is an art
of contrast and collision. Irony and humor often
emerge in this process. Some art teachers may
shy away from humor and irony, believing them
to be negative responses in which students
make light of serious issues. I argue to the
44 ART EDUCATION / MARCH 2008
contrary. Humor and satire are serious business; they are
particularly sharp-edged tools for exposing critical incongruities and problems. Most high school students respond to irony because they encounter it everyday in the popular media. They often get their news from Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, two
popular comedians who host parodies of news programs on
cable television. Students experience the ways humor and satire
can make you laugh, cry and think all at the same time. This
lesson will help them to understand that experience. It will also
help them to see how humor (and some contemporary art)
reframe and distill complex ideas down to make powerful statements. It is, therefore, a lesson in media literacy.
Conclusion
Returning to the original premise, the lesson presented here
highlights the thinking processes or strategies of conceptual
collage and metaphor. The focus here is on thinking and concept
development as fundamental art skills, which are as basic to
making an artistic statement as art techniques and design
principles (Freedman, 2003b). This approach stands in contrast
to conventional art lessons that concentrate on learning about
style, materials, techniques or genres of art. This lesson also
differs from conventional lessons in that it presents coherent
defined steps for developing meaning?simple steps that create
complexity. It gives students a clear strategy for developing their
own meanings in a structured way. In promoting conceptual
strategies and conceptual skills, it does not forgo developing the
material' art skills. Rather, this lesson provides an example how
all these skills, conceptual and material, can be taught at the
same time. It is a common belief among art teachers that honing
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
The Iraq Souvenir Pack (2003). Paul Gralin and Sabrina Yacoub.
technical skills should precede developing conceptual skills. This
implies that students cannot make meaning until they master the
materials or techniques. I disagree and concur with Freedman
(2003b) that these capacities need to be developed simultaneously.
Contemporary art, in providing us with images in which the
conceptual strategies behind them can be easily accessed, offers us
a great tool for doing it all.
Julia Marshall is Associate Professor of Art Education at San Francisco State
University, San Francisco, California. E-mail: jmarsh@sfsu. edu
nccCRFNCES
Black, M. (1981). Metaphor. In Johnson, M. (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on i
metaphor, (pp. 63-81). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain,
mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: Commission on Behavioral
and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National
Academy.
Dorn, C. (1999). Mind in art: Cognitive foundations in art education. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Efland, A. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curric
ulum. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eisner, E. (2002). Arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
Erickson (2005). Teaching for transfer through integrated online and
traditional art instruction. Studies in art education 46(2) 170-185.
Freedman, K. (2003a). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the
social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.
Freedman, K. (2003b). The importance of student artistic production
in
teaching visual culture. Art education 56(2) 38-42.
Haskeil, R.E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning.
San Diego: Academic Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of
Chicago.
Marshall, J. (2004). Metaphor in art, thought and learning. In Smith-Shank, D.
(Ed.), Semiotics and art: sights, signs and significance. Reston, VA: National
Art Education Association.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). The function of fiction in shaping reality. In M. Valdes, (Ed.)
A Ricoeur reader: reflection and imagination (117-136).
Toronto: University
of Toronto.
loland, C. (1992). Improving student thinking through elementary art
instruction. In Johnson, A. (Ed.). Art education: Elementary. Reston, VA:
National Art Education Association.
Sandburg, C. (1913). Fog. In (1970) The complete poems of Carl Sandburg. New
York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Stafford, B. (1999). Recombinancy: Binding the computational "new
mind"
to
the combinatorial "old mind". In Visual analogy: consciousness as the art of
connecting. Cambridge MA: MIT.
RESOURCES FOR LOCATING THE ARTWORK
Kendell Geers:
Farrell, L. Ed. (2003) Looking both ways: Art of the contemporary African
diaspora. New York: Museum of African Art.
Gabriel Kuri:
Transactions: Contemporary Latin American and Latino art (2006). San
Diego: Museum of Contemporary Art.
Ai Weiwei: Frehner, M. & Heinrich, C. Ed. (2005) Mahjong: Contemporary Chinese art
from the Sigg collection. Ostfildern-Ruit, Germany: Hatje Cantz.
Wang Du:
Wang Du. (2004). Paris: Editions Cercle d'Art.
Charles Krafft:
McGee, M. & Reid, L. (2002). Charles Kraffts villa delirium. Santa Ana, CA:
Grand Central Press.
Michael Oatman:
Thompson, N. Ed. (2005). Becoming animal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
JULIA MARSHALL/ VISIBLE THINKING 45
This content downloaded from 185.44.79.40 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:12:15 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions