Virtual organizations:Team Science, Team Shakespeare

Presenter’s Name

Virtual Organizations

• An increasing artifact of the landscape of scientific research, largely from the cost complex nature of the new instruments and growing data sets

• Always inter-institutional, frequently international• Having a “mission” in teaching and a need for administration• Tend to cluster around unique global scale facilities and

instruments• Heavily reflected in agency solicitations and peer review

processes• Being seen now in the arts and humanities

Presenter’s Name

Virtual Organizations as seen by NSF OCI• A virtual organization is a group of individuals whose members and resources

may be dispersed geographically, yet who function as a coherent unit through the use of cyberinfrastructure. Virtual organizations may be known by a range of names, including: collaboratories, distributed work groups, virtual teams, online communities, and science gateways.  

• Distributed across space, with participants spanning localities and institutions; • Distributed across time, allowing synchronous as well asynchronous

interactions; • Dynamic structures and processes, at every stage of the organizational

lifecycle; • Computationally enabled, via collaboration support systems including e-mail,

teleconferencing, telepresence, awareness, social computing, and group information management tools; and,

• Computationally enhanced, with simulations, databases, instrumentation, analytic tools and services which facilitate interaction with human affiliates that are integral to the functioning of the organization.

Presenter’s Name

Virtual Organization Characteristics

• Distributed across space

• Distributed across time

• Dynamic management structures

• Collaboratively enabled

• Computationally enhanced

Presenter’s Name

Building Effective Virtual Organizations

• A workshop run by NSF in January 2008 to give many newly minted VO’s the wisdom of the ages

• Cross directorate with OCI catalytic

• A few very insightful talks

• Was intended to cover the complex social and economic issues as well as some common technical issues, but veered towards collaboration chaos…

• http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/events/VirtOrg2008/

Presenter’s Name

Virtual Organization Drivers (VOSS)

• A growing shift away from traditions of individual based science toward more collaborative models.

• The intellectual challenges and institutional conditions of 21st century science and engineering necessitate  collaboration. In many fields, scholars are confronted with challenges of a scale and complexity that defy the boundaries of traditional fields as well as the limits of individual capacity.

• Many scientists and engineers find themselves today working in collaborations, many of which cross disciplinary, institutional, and geographic borders via the support of cyberinfrastructure.

• http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08550/nsf08550.htm

Presenter’s Name

VOSS interests

• Units and frameworks of analysis—both social and technical      • Organizational life cycles • Production and innovation: What technological, social, and legal arrangements

support intellectual production and innovation in virtual organizations?   • Organizational structure, scope, and scaling   • Individual and collective motivation• Management, Governance, and Leadership• Measurement and assessment• Comparative performance: Under what conditions do virtual organizations

outperform co-located organizations? What tasks or processes can be done or done better by virtual organizations that cannot be done or done as well in co-located organizations, and vice versa? What are the advantages and disadvantages of technological-mediation? Under what conditions (and how) might virtual organizations be instrumented to advance our understanding of certain phenomena better than co-located organizations?

Presenter’s Name

NSF Datanet

• Develop the new methods, management structures and technologies to manage the diversity, size, and complexity of current and future data sets and data streams

• New types of organizations envisioned in this solicitation will integrate library and archival sciences, cyberinfrastructure, computer and information sciences, and domain science expertise.• provide reliable digital preservation, access, integration, and analysis

capabilities for science and/or engineering data over a decades-long timeline; • continuously anticipate and adapt to changes in technologies and in user

needs • engage at the frontiers of computer and information science and

cyberinfrastructure • serve as component elements of an interoperable data preservation and

access network. • http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503141&org=OCI

Presenter’s Name

Comanage

• A collaboration management platform, supported in part by a NSF OCI grant, being developed by the Internet2 community, with Stanford as a lead institution

• Well-behaved applications externalize their identity management dimensions to an general identity/group/privilege/etc repository (LDAP, MySQL, etc.)

• Users manage IdM in a collaboration-centric way, not in a tool-centric way

• Uses Shibboleth, Grouper, and Signet• Open source, open protocol

Presenter’s Name

Domesticated applications

• Applications that externalize their identity management dimensions

• Domestication typically goes in stages – first identity, then group and privilege management, then provisioning

• Domestication relative to the external access protocols (SAML, LDAP, MySQL, web services, etc.)

• Applications done or being targeted• Sympa, Confluence, Asterisk (open-source IP audioconferencing),

Dim-Dim (open-source web meeting), Bedeworks (federated open-source calendar), Subversion, JIRA, Al fresco

• Finally domain science resources – Instrument, Grids

FederatedWiki

Domain Science

Grid

Domain Science

Instrument

University A University B Laboratory X

CollaborationManagement

Platform

CollaborationTools/ Resources

ApplicationAttributes

Home Org & Id Providers/

Sources ofAuthority

AttributeEcosystem

Flows

Attribute/Resource Info Data Store

Collaboration Management Platform (CMP)and the Attribute Ecosystem

Sources of Authority

CoAuthorization –

Group InfoAuthorization –Privilege Info

AuthenticationPeoplePicker

OtherFunctions

manage

File Sharing

CalendarPhone/Video

Conference

Email List

Manager

Presenter’s Name

Two specimen VO’s

• LIGO-GEO-VIRGO (www.ligo.org)

• Ocean Observing Initiative (http://www.joiscience.org/ocean_observing)

• Interests include federated identity, COmanage, and domain science use

• Both have international characteristics

Presenter’s Name

Lessons Learned

• Collaborate externally; compete internally

• Time zones are hell

• Big turf issue of the local VO sysadmin

• Many of the instruments are black-boxes

• Physical access controls matter

• Scientific accomplishments and egos