vipassana meditation as taught by s.n

Upload: shobhit-gajbhiye

Post on 04-Jun-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Vipassana Meditation as Taught by S.N

    1/1

    11/13/13 Vipassana Meditation as taught by S.N. Goenka

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/vipassana.sng/permalink/10151966458803718/

    Norman Fischer: I understand that you have a good friendship with His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Can you tell us how

    that developed, particularly since His Holiness' tradition, with all its color and ritual, contrasts with your approach?

    S.N. Goenka: In the first year when I moved to India from Burma, there was a big public function put on by Dr.

    Babasaheb Ambedkar's followers, who had become Buddhists. They invited me to their annual celebration of the day

    that Dr. Ambedkar converted to Buddhism. There were some one and a half million people in attendance. His Holiness

    the Dalai Lama was invited, along with me and the Japanese teacher Fuji Guruji. We were invited as chief guests, and

    each of us gave a speech. Mine was translated into Tibetan and His Holiness liked it so much that he said that he

    wanted to meet me and discuss things.

    We started at nine o'clock the next morning and at two-thirty or three we were still talking-all about technique. He

    was very happy with my teaching. But when I said, "Quite a few people on the second day or third day see light," he

    responded, "No, no. That must be illusion. How can somebody see light in three days? It takes years to see light."

    I replied, "Venerable sir, I saw light in my eyes. And so have many other people. I would not say it is an illusion. You

    better send a few of your lamas and let them experience it. If I am wrong, I will rectify it. I don't teach them that they

    must see light. It is merely a sign, a milestone on a long path, not the final goal."

    So he sent three lamas to my next course in Sarnath. All three of them saw light, and they were so happy. When they

    went back and explained that to His Holiness, he was also happy. He said, "Goenka, come here and give a course to

    my people." Then I wrote him back, "When I give a course these are the rules. I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings

    but if your high lamas don't agree to my rules, I cannot teach." He sent a message back to me, "Goenka, they will

    follow whatever you say for the full ten days. So don't worry; they will follow your rules."

    The course took place in the Tibetan library in Dharamsala, not far from where His Holiness was living. On the first

    day, when I told all the very top-ranking lamas my rules, they protested: "But every day, we have rituals to perform,

    we have to chant so many recitations, we have to prostrate so many times."

    "Nothing doing," I replied. "For ten days, nothing doing." And they said, "No, we can't break our life-long vow." So I

    sent word to the Dalai Lama, "Sir, I can't teach. Your people don't agree. I'm sorry, I have to go." And he sent word to

    the lamas through his private secretary, "You have to followGoenka's instructions, even if it means breaking your

    rules. Whatever he says, you must agree to do." They all did it, and they got the same result. Rites or no rites, rituals

    or no rituals, the technique gives results.

    Normally I don't go out during a course, but the Dalai Lama wanted to discuss how it was going, so I visited him two

    times. We had long discussions in detail about the technique I teach and about his technique also-without judging, jus

    exploring with inquisitiveness. We each enjoyed our discussions tremendously. Since then we have been friends.

    I am not interested in any kind of politics. Of course I have great sympathy for whatever is happening to the Tibetan

    people, but I can't take up that cause. It's not part of my duty as a dharma teacher. Even the most undemocratic

    person, even the greatest tyrant, will be a good person if he practices. Just as Buddha was not interested in the

    politics of the different kings of his day, so that's not my job either. His Holiness understands that very well. We are

    not political friends, but rather dharma friends.

    He did keep asking me about sunnata, emptiness. "You've got no sunnata?" he would ask. But after I explained my

    understanding of it, he accepted what I said: that when all solidity is dissolved in the technique, and there's nothing

    but vibration remaining, that is sunnata. Then you experience something beyond mind and matter-sunna-nothing to

    hold there. You have sunna of the mind and matter sphere and sunna of the beyond mind and matter sphere. His

    Holiness seemed to be quite happy with that explanation. He had no objection.