Village of Rochester300 W. Spring Street (262) 534-2431 Phone P.O. Box 65 (262) 534-4084 Fax Rochester, WI 53167 email: vrochstr@wi.rr.com website: http://rochesterwi.us

Reflections of the Past...

Visions of the Future

AGENDAVILLAGE OF ROCHESTER 

VILLAGE BOARD MEETING THURSDAY, AUGUST 11, 2016** 

7:00 P.M. 

ROCHESTER VILLAGE HALL, 300 W. SPRING ST., ROCHESTER, WI **on a date other than regularly scheduled.

 

1.  Roll Call by Village President:  Ed Chart  Village Trustees:  Nick Ahlers, Gary Beck, Chris Bennett, Russ Kumbier, Chris Johnson,  Mike Weinkauf 

2.  Pledge of Allegiance 

3.  Period of Public Comment for Pre‐Registered Citizens. Please be advised per State Statute Section 19.84(2), information will be received from the public.  It is the policy of this municipality that citizens be pre‐registered to present comments or suggestions to the Village Board.  Registration forms will be available at the meeting and must be turned in to the Village Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.  Pre‐registered Citizens will be called by name by the Village President and are subject to a three minute time period, per person, with time extensions granted at the Village Board’s discretion.  Be further advised that there may be limited discussion on the information received; however, no action will be taken under public comments. 

4.  Department Reports 

  A.   Sheriff’s Department 

    1.  Activity Report 

    2.  Communication or directives for upcoming quarter 

5.  Day in the Country event planning:  Pamela Lee, Committee Spokesperson 

6.  Discuss Proposal to Purchase/ Finance New Radios:  Rochester Volunteer Fire Company  

7.  2017 Law Enforcement Contract Proposal 

8.  Review and Discuss Implementation Plan for Ag School Drain Tile Improvements 

9.  Request to Use Area Adjacent to Case Eagle Baseball Diamonds for Youth Football Practice 

10.  Appoint Special Prosecuting Attorney to serve in the Kempen Vicious Dog and other possible future Conflict of Interest matters:   Atty. Ed Bruner  

11. 

 

(8:00 p.m.)  Adjourn into closed session as allowed by Wis. Stats. s. 19.85(1)(g) Conferring with legal counsel for the governmental body who is rendering oral advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the Village Board with respect to the Kempen vicious dog cases. 

12.  Reconvene into Open Session 

13.  Consider any motions on the matter listed under closed session 

14.  Plan Commission Recommendation:   Ordinance and Procedural requirements for development on Private roads  

 

15.  Finance Committee Recommendation:   Pay increase for Building Custodian  

VILLAGE OF ROCHESTER VILLAGE BOARD AGENDA

AUGUST 11, 2016 ROCHESTER VILLAGE HALL

PAGE 2

16.  Finance Committee Recommendation:    Part‐time Administrative Support Position  

17.  Correspondence: 

  A.  Racine County Clerk:   Transmittal of Resolution #2016‐70 authorizing the resurfacing of County Highway D  (Main Street) from State Street to State Highway 36  

18.  Committee/ Representative Reports: 

  A.  Ordinance Committee 

   1. 

Report on discussion and action taken at previous meetings and future agenda items.  Next meeting:  TBD 

  B.  Rochester Fire and Rescue Company Executive Board 

   1. 

Report on discussion and action taken at previous meetings and future agenda items.  Next meeting:   September 6, 2016 

  C.  Central Racine County Health Department 

   1. 

Report on discussion and action taken at previous meetings and future agenda items.  Next meeting:   August 18, 2016 

  D.  Honey Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District Board 

   1. 

Report on discussion and action taken at previous meetings and future agenda items.  Next meeting:   August 16, 2016 

  E.  Southeast Wisconsin Fox River Commission 

   1. 

Report on discussion and action taken at previous meetings and future agenda items.  Next meeting:   August 12, 2016 

  F.  Finance Committee 

    1.  Review of Monthly Disbursements and Cash Sheet 

    2.  Board Action 

19.  Adjourn 

Betty Novy, Clerk/Treasurer                                                                                    Posted:  August 5, 2016 

 ‐It is possible that members and possibly a quorum of members of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above stated meeting to gather information; no action will be taken by any governmental body at the above stated meeting other than the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice.  ‐Please note:  Upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appropriate aids and services.  For additional information or to request this service, please contact the Village Hall at 262‐534‐2431.                                                                                                                                                    Next Meeting:  August 22, 2016    

RACINE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE 717 Wisconsin Avenue, Racine, WI 53403-1237 (262) 886-2300 FAX (262) 637-5279 Waterford (262) 534-5166 Burlington (262) 763-9558 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sheriff Christopher K. Schmaling Chief Deputy John C. Hanrahan

Village of Rochester July 2016 Activity Report  

 

Citations 

 Accidents: 0   Speeding:  2    Traffic: 4     Parking: 11     Warnings: 7 

 

 

Arrests  

                Felony:  1          Misdemeanor:  1         Ordinance:  0            OWI:  0                 

 

Complaints  

                Assigned:  15        Deputy Initiated:  4        Assisted:  2       Follow up:  24       

 

Other Activities  

Warrants Served: 0          Civil Process Served: 0 

 

 

Foot Patrols:  19

Work Days; 10 Miles Driven; 419 Hours; 91.75

Time out of the Village : 0 Hr.

Sergeant Bill Mattke

ACTIVITY REPORT FOR ROCHESTER JULY 2016 TOTAL OUT # OF MILES HOURS CMPLS CMPLS CMPLS CMPLS CMPLS ARR CIT ARR ORD ARR ARR ARR WRNT WRNT CIVIL CIVIL FOOT SHF NAME DAYS DRIVEN WORKED ASGND ORIG FL-UP ASIST TOTAL SPD TRFC PARK OWI WARN NTRF MISD ACC ATMD SRVD PTRL OF ACC FEL TOT ATMD SRVD VIL 2 MILAM,C 10 419 81.75 15 4 24 2 45 2 0 4 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 19 0

Total SHF 2: 10 419 81.75 15 4 24 2 45 2 0 4 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 19 0

TOTAL ALL: 10 419 81.75 15 4 24 2 45 2 0 4 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 19 0

Monday, August 01, 2016 Page 1 of 1

1

Betty Novy

From: Rochester Vol. Fire Co. <rvfc@tds.net>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 10:49 AMTo: Betty NovySubject: Meeting agenda request

Good Morning Betty,  I would like to formally request to be placed on the village board meeting agenda on Monday August 8th, 2016 to discuss the radio proposal with the board. I have Chief Steve Hansen lined up to attend the meeting as well because he is the most knowledgeable person to discuss this proposal as well as answer any questions anyone may have. Let me know if you have any questions.   Jack A. Biermann Jr. Assistant Fire Chief Rochester Volunteer Fire Co. P.O. Box 38 Rochester, WI 53167 262‐534‐3444 Station 262‐534‐2652 Fax rvfc@tds.net 

RACINE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 717 Wisconsin Avenue, Racine, WI 53403-1237 (262) 886-2300 FAX (262) 637-5279 Waterford (262) 534-5166 Burlington (262) 763-9558

Sheriff Christopher Schmaling

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

Village Clerk Betty Novy

Village of Rochester Municipal Building

300 W. Spring St.

Rochester, WI 53167

3

Chief Deputy John C. Hanrahan

Enclosed are~copies of the 2017 Village Law Enforcement contract proposal. The ability of the

Sheriff's Office to contract with the Village has been approved by the Racine County Board. Please :::?

review, have the contract signed, and return the .tw'Ooriginals to my attention for processing with

the County. After the Village & County officials sign all copies, I will send a copy back to you.

If you have any questions please call.

Thank you,

Christopher Schmaling

Sheriff, Racine County

By: Sgt. William Mattke

Contract Services Administrator

262-886-8197

William.Mattke®GoRacine.org

RACINE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 717 Wisconsin Avenue, Racine, WI 53403-1237 (262) 886-2300 FAX (262) 637-5279 Waterford (262) 534-5166 Burlington (262) 763-9558

Sheriff Christopher Schmaling --------~~~------~-------

ChiefDeputy John C. Hanrahan

AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this __ day of , 2016, between Racine County, a quasi-municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "County") and the Village of Rochester, a municipal corporation located within Racine County (hereinafter referred to as the "Village"),

WHEREAS, the Village desires to purchase police services and protection within the Village, the Village being willing to assume the cost of this protection; and,

WHEREAS, the County is willing to provide this police protection to the Village under certain terms and conditions.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties as follows:

1. That the County agrees to furnish and the Village agrees to pay for police services upon the terms and conditions as set forth and appendix "A" as attached.

2. The law enforcement services provided by the County shall generally include the enforcement of all local ordinances in effect in the Village. The Sheriff of Racine County shall have supervisory control over the personnel providing these services. The Sheriff shall consider any requests or suggestions made by the Village, but the Sheriff shall retain final authority to make the final decision as to the manner in which such services shall be rendered.

3. It is agreed that, whenever possible, all arrests made in the Village by Deputy Sheriffs contracted for and assigned to the Village shall be made under municipal ordinance. It is understood that prosecution costs are not covered in the administrative costs.

4. It is agreed that the Sheriff, whenever possible, will cooperate with the Village Municipal Court in scheduling the Deputies to perform the services herein, so as to permit a Deputy to testify in court during his regularly scheduled shift in an effort to minimize overtime for court appearances.

5. By June 1st of any year, either party may terminate this agreement for the following year by notifying the other parties in writing. If the Village desires a reduction or increase in services for the following year it must notifY the County by June 1st. In the event that both parties desire to continue to contract for police services for the following year, the County shall provide to the Village by August 1st of any year the estimated costs for police services for the following year. By August 1st, the Village shall provide to the County any schedule or format changes they would like the following year.

6. This agreement shall be for a one-year period commencing on January 1st of any given year unless the parties mutually agree upon a different period.

Executed at Racine County, Wisconsin, on the date and year first above written.

VILLAGE OF ROCHESTER RACINE COUNTY

Village President Sheriff

Village Clerk County Executive

Sgt. \VEM2012

RACINE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 717 Wisconsin Avenue, Racine, WI 53403-1237 (262) 886-2300 FAX (262) 637-5279 Waterford (262) 534-5166 Burlington (262) 763-9558

Sheriff Christopher Schrnaling Chief Deputy John C. Hamahan

Tuesday, August 02, 2016

APPENDIX "A"

This appendix contains the terms and conditions for the provision of police services by the County of Racine for the Village of Rochester for the contract year 2017. The terms and conditions for this agreement for the year 2017 are as follows:

1. The total cost of law enforcement services is based on 1800 hours of service for one deputy in a calendar year. The cost includes; salaries, fringe benefits, administrative costs, vehicle depreciation, fuel, and maintenance.

2. The total yearly per officer cost for law enforcement services is based on 1,800 working hours per year. The hourly rate and total cost per year is indicated in Appendix "B".

3. The Village will be billed monthly based on the services provided on an hourly basis, plus mileage. Mileage is based on the average of the last 3 years at the per mile rate indicated in Appendix "B". The village will be billed the "Monthly Cost" indicated in Appendix "B".

4. The County will provide coverage based on the need for services. The method of deployment will be in the manner set forth in the scheduling of squad cars as approved by the Sheriff and the Village.

5. The only adjustment to be made will be a reduction when a "Village Squad" is called out of the Village to answer a Sheriff's Department call. This reduction will be at the same hourly rate indicated in Appendix "B".

SgtWEM6632

Wages:

Racine County Sheriffs Office 2017 Law Enforcement Contract

Village of Rochester Appendix B

Deputies wage per month Yearly wage total Plus Longevity Clothing Allowance Wages Total

Employee Benefits:

Wisconsin Retirement Workers Compensation Public Liability FICA Life Insurance Group Insurance Benefits Total

Cost Per Deputy (wages total plus benefits total)

,138. $1,342.78

$600.00 $69,081.70

$13,559.38 $1,191.58 $1,369.63 $5,238.85

$427.33

$100,933.47

Contract Includes L-__ 1 _ __.1Deputies. Total Deputy Cost $100,933.47

Hourly Application of Services:

Annual Work Days Per Year Vacation Days Holiday

Total Annual Days Available Per Deputy

Total Annual Hours Available Per Deputy

L-__ 1 __ _.1Deputies per contract Total Hours

Hourly Deputy Cost (Cost Per Deputy / Annual Hours Per Deputy)

Administration and Mileage: Administrative Costs Mileage /Mile

1 IShift(s) t--:-1 ':':'3-:, 0:-:1-::8:---1 Miles '-----'----'

TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Total Deputy Cost+ admin. cost & mileage)

Monthly Cost

244 18

1

225

1800

18001

$56.07

$1,500.00 $7,029.72

$109,463.19 $9,121.93

Village of Rochester - Stormwater Utility 2016 Budget

 11.9.15 Recommended Budget]

2014 Actual

Jan‐ Oct 

2015

Est. thru 

Year End

Estimated 

Total 2015 Budget 2016 Budget

Per unit‐ 

Budget

Income 2016 Fee:

46000 ∙ Stormwater Utility Charges 106,930.72    105,644.38 0.00 105,644.38 105,579.80 106,014.00 62.00$          

46110 ∙ Interest Income 311.29           188.76 100.00 288.76 200.00 300.00 1,709.90

Total Income 107,242.01    105,833.14 100.00 105,933.14 105,779.80 106,314.00

Fund Balance Carried Over From Previous Year: 111,409.72    38,551.25 0.00 38,551.25 8,364.68 82,761.82 2015 Fee:

Operating/ Capital Project Funds: 218,651.73    144,384.39 100.00 144,484.39 114,144.48 189,075.82

2014 Fee:

Expenses

51300 ∙ General Legal Expenses ‐                  0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

51400 ∙ Administrative Expenses 9,012.50        10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 12,000.00

51405 ∙ Operations Related to Utility 9,071.90        10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

53441 ∙ General Engineering Expenses 253.75           85.00 500.00 585.00 5,000.00 5,000.0053442 ∙ Stormwater Equipment Expense 982.12           0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

53443 ∙ Permit Expense ‐                  0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

53444 ∙ Drainage District Assessments 12,509.04      13,207.77 0.00 13,207.77 16,003.16 13,207.77

53445 ∙ Audit Expense 2,616.66        2,580.00 0.00 2,580.00 3,000.00 2,700.00

53446 ∙ Capital Project Expense

53446a ∙ Land Acquisition Expense 78.30             0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

53446b ∙ Engineering/ Geotechnical Expense 38,581.62      0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

53446c ∙ Construction Costs 106,994.79    5,759.80 18,390.00 24,149.80 38,000.00 124,250.00

59000 ∙ Transfer to Capital Project Fund 38,551.25      0.00 82,761.82 82,761.82 27,141.32 16,918.05

Total Expenses 218,651.93    41,632.57 102,851.82 144,484.39 114,144.48  189,075.82

Capital Projects List:

2014: Construction Administration  Repair of Ag School Tile CTH W/ Outlet ($5,800) ‐               

N. River Road Drainage Study (Est. $15,000)

Construction:  Repair of Ag School Tile CTH W/Outlet ($79,863)

N. River Road/ Fox Grove Drive Ditch Project Engineering ($7,924)

N. River Road/ Fox Grove Drive Ditch Project Construction ($21,675)

June Lane Culvert Repair ($4,610)

2015: Ryan Road Culvert Repair ($4,034)

N. River Road Ditch Cleaning ($1,726)

Oak Knoll Road Ditching ($17,190)

Mather Street ($1,200)

2016: N. River Road Re‐construction Drainage Improvements (Est. at $124,250)

2017: Design Engineering:  Repair of Ag School Tile Wegge/ Kircher Property Tile (2011 Estimate: $17,000)

Design Engineering:  Repair of Ag School Tile Maryl & Gypsy Ln Improvements (2011 Estimate:  $15,000)

? ? : Construction:  Repair of Ag School Tile Wegge/ Kircher Property Tile (2011 Estimate: $59,000)

Construction:  Repair of Ag School Tile Maryl & Gypsy Ln Improvements (2011 Estimate:  $42,000)

$62.00

$63.20

X:\Consolidated Village\Board Meetings\2016 Board Meetings\August 11 2016\2016 V. Stormwater Utility Budget‐ Ag School Projects Added Page 1 of 1

1

Betty Novy

From: jerry@wisconsinfh.comSent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:13 AMTo: bnovy@rochesterwi.usSubject: Practice at Case EagleAttachments: caseeagle.jpg

To whom it may concern, My name is Jared Werth.  I am the head coach for the 3rd/4th graders Waterford Youth Football.  We are looking for a place to practice.  Our practices will be on Monday, Tuesday, and Fridays.  From August 15, 2016 ‐ October 28, 2016.  Our practices would run from about 5:00PM until 7:00PM. I was interested in practicing in the grassy area north of the baseball diamonds and east of the parking lot.  I have attached a picture of the area I'm hoping to use. I have 18 children on the team.  These kids are all from the area.   Rochester, Waterford, Wind Lake, Burlington, etc.  We are insured through our league. Thank you for your consideration.  I will wait for your reply.  Jared  Werth 

1

Staff Report To: Plan Commission Members From: Betty Novy, Clerk-Treasurer/ Jon Schattner, Zoning Administrator Date: July 28, 2016 Re: Recommendation regarding ordinance and procedural requirements for development on Private roads

History:  The attached report documents existing private roads in the Village of Rochester. Most private roads existed prior to the adoption of county zoning in 1971. Since zoning regulations have been in place (45 years), there have been only three instances of private roads being allowed in the (previous) Town or Village of Rochester. Approval of each of these instances was through Planned Unit Development (overlay) zoning. PUD zoning allows exception to underlying zoning district regulations for lot size, frontage, setback, and various other zoning requirements but does not allow exception to the underlying use (e.g. residential or commercial). In Question: Two Changes to the Zoning and Land Division Code adopted 7/1/2014 (underlined) 35-15B. Site Restrictions (Zoning Code). “All Lots shall abut upon a public street, or a private road approved by the Village, or other means of access if that access was in existence prior to the adoption of this chapter……”

Previous Village Zoning: Ch. 15, s.2.06 b.) “All Lots shall abut upon a public street, and each lot shall have a minimum frontage of thirty (30) feet.” Previous County Zoning: 20-986(d) “A minimum of thirty-three (33) feet of all lots shall abut upon a public street, or other means of access if that access was in existence prior to the adoption of this chapter…”

30-84F. Lot and Block Standards (Land Division Code). “All lots shall abut publicly dedicated streets, or private streets when allowed by the Village Board.”

Previous Village Land Division Code: Ch. 16, s.7.6 “Lots.” Access. “Every lot shall front or abut for a distance of at least thirty-three (33) feet on a public street or other officially approved means of access”. Previous Town Land Division Code: Section 27.804. “Lot and Block Standards”. Subsection f. “All lots shall abut publicly dedicated streets”.

While the private road language was recently inserted into the code, no process was included to guide the Plan Commission or Village Board in terms of private road approval. This is NOT good, because there should be a process to determine what circumstances warrant approval of a private (vs. public) road. Otherwise, decisions might seem arbitrary (defined: based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system). These are the types of decisions that can get a village in trouble. It seemed that Plan Commission discussion last month was leading in the direction of NOT viewing private roads favorably, but that if they were to be allowed, that they be platted and constructed to public road standards. The public road platting and construction aspect is supported in the appendices of the Land Division Code which provide direction for the construction of improvements (as follows):

CONFIDENTIAL

August 5, 2016

2

SECTION 1 - ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, 1.1 INTRODUCTION: These standards have been prepared to insure that the design and construction of public improvements will meet the minimum requirements of the Village. The intent of Section 1 is to provide an overview of requirements and procedures required by Chapter 30, Land Division, which govern the design and construction of public improvements. These standards are also intended to provide uniform design criteria for facilities designed for or directly by the Village, as well as provide specifications for private development within the Village. The appendixes provide administrative and construction standards for erosion control, utility, stormwater, and roadway improvements. ALSO discussed last month, certain other items need to be addressed with the approval of private roads such as public access and utility easements, development agreements with the village, restrictions and covenants, and financial considerations affecting not only initial construction of the road- but also ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Newly inserted language.. Private road approved by the village; private streets approved by the Village Board The key to this language is “approved by”. We recommend the PUD zoning process be utilized as the guideline for private road approval. The land division code supports all engineering, construction, and legal requirements applicable to private development being the same as public development in its appendixes. In some ways, private roads are more complicated due to the need to create more easements and create all the legal documents necessary to address future maintenance and upkeep of road and stormwater improvements. Hence, there really is no financial advantage to developing on a private road. However, some may still want to develop this way to create an “exclusive” development that provides benefits or services, above and beyond those that are publicly provided, to those that purchase lots there. This, again, is best accomplished through the Planned Unit Development Overlay zoning and process. In regards to the Franciscan Missions CSM, the ordinance provides that “All Lots shall abut upon a public street, or a private road approved by the Village, or other means of access if that access was in existence prior to the adoption of this Chapter and was previously approved by the municipality.” This access easement was platted before county zoning was implemented. The Town has approved and signed off on at least two CSM’s displaying this particular access easement since then- it even took actions to name the road for emergency response purposes. These actions suggest that the access was previously approved by the municipality. This CSM will be coming back for further consideration at a future meeting. In regards to new private road development proposals: To be consistent with past practice, we recommend that the approval process for private road developments be developed under PUD zoning guidelines; or that they simply proceed with the development proposal to construct and develop on a publicly dedicated road. Either process can be accomplished via CSM when creating four or less lots. We also recommend that both zoning and land division codes be amended to clarify that private roads be approved through the Planned Unit Development zoning process.

28‐Jul‐16 

PRIVATE ROADS EXISTING IN THE VILLAGE OF ROCHESTER 

Platted 1920?:  Honey Lake Subdivision Roads (Paved) 

Substandard Roads‐ Owned, Managed & Maintained by the Honey Lake Protection & Rehabilitation District 

Narrow (some only 8’ wide)   

Current structures and landscaping prohibit converting roads to standard road right of way width 

Enforcement of laws applicable to traffic on public streets do not apply so law enforcement has had to 

get creative at times to deal with that. 

Residents are subject to additional taxes for road maintenance and street lights. 

‐Established 1928:“Unnamed Road” off of Academy Road (Gravel‐ 33’ Wide) 

Provides Access to DNR Hunting grounds and adjacent parcel to the west, now owned by KES Holdings, on 

Academy Road.   Each party has ½ ownership interest.  The private road has been in common use since 1928, 

with the DNR gaining ownership of their parcel in 1958.   ½ ownership interest was recorded with the Register of 

Deeds in 1985. 

Spoke with Marty Johnson, Property Manager, with the DNR.   All costs for maintenance are “generally” split 

between the two owners. 

Earliest Record 1936:  “Beguhl Road” (off of N. Maple Lane) 

No recorded easements or agreements on file.   No houses access off road.   Property was being maintained by 

the Town of Rochester until 2011 when it was finally determined to be a private drive.  Now, maintenance, if 

any, is performed by surrounding property owners. 

Existed prior to county zoning (1971) “Timberlane Drive” (Gravel – 25’ Wide Easement) 

Right of way agreement was executed in 1987 to document access to the eight parcels and provide a mechanism 

for paying for the upkeep of the road, snowplowing, etc.   This was required by the bank when one of the 

residents went to re‐finance a mortgage. 

Existed prior to county zoning (1971): “Hunters Trail” (Paved – 66’ Wide Easement) 

Created via easement in early 1971‐ granted by the Buss family to Lang Engineering in exchange for them 

constructing and maintaining the road. 

Private roads created through PUD* (Planned Unit Development) Overlay Zoning: 

1996:  Rodaza Drive (Gravel – 66’ Wide‐ terminates in a bulb 90’ cul de sac –not improved) 

Created via CSM‐ “Declaration of Easement” leaves it completely up to the owners, by unanimous consent, as to 

how the private road is improved, but provides mechanism for future cost sharing  for maintenance, repairs and 

replacement.  This was a previous gravel pit owned by Donald Lang. 

2005:  Settlement Drive; Oak Hill Circle (Paved – 28’ Wide)  

Created via CSM & Condominium Plat‐ Restrictive Covenants, Access & Utility Easements in place  

2006:  Millgate Drive  (Paved‐ 66’ Wide) 

Created via CSM‐ 

CSM documents public ingress/egress, stormwater & sanitary sewer easements 

Declaration of Restrictions, Covenants, & Easements addresses upkeep of road and other matters 

*PUD zoning allows exception to the underlying zoning district regulations for lot size, frontage, setback, and 

various other zoning provisions subject to plan commission and village board approval.   

County Wages and Employment by Occupation Results Area: Racine CountyYear: 2015Wage Type: Hourly

Page 1 of 1

Click on arrows to sort columns

Area Year SOC Occupation Wage Type Statistic Type Wage Respondents Employment

Racine County 2015 370000

Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occu

Hourly wage Mean (average) 12.96 73 2210

Racine County 2015 370000

Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occu

Hourly wage Mean of 1st third (Default Entry Wages) 8.44 73 2210

Racine County 2015 370000

Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occu

Hourly wage Mean of upper two thirds (Default Expr) 15.22 73 2210

3 Records found

About the EDS data EDS data downloads Subscribe to EDS dataBack to Data Table menu

Home | Contact Us | About Us | Legal | Help | What's New | Site MapDepartment of Workforce Development

The information on this site is updated regularly. The same search run at another time may produce different results.

Page 1 of 1WORKnet - Data Analyst - EDS

8/5/2016http://worknet.wisconsin.gov/worknet/daedswage.aspx?menuselection=da

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

RESOLUTION NO. 2016-70 July 26, 2016

RESOLUTION BY THE PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS AND FACILITIES COMMITTEE AUTHORIZING A PROJECT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF COUNTY TRUNK HIGHWAY (CTH) D, FROM STATE STREET TO STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY (STH) 36, IN THE VILLAGE OF ROCHESTER

To the Honorable members of the Racine County Board of Supervisors:

BE IT RESOLVED that t~e Racine County Board of Supervisors a~thorizes a project for the improvement.of County Trunk Highway (CTH) D, from State Street to State Trunk Highway (STH) 36, in the Village of Rochester.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Racine County Board of Supervisors that there are funds available for this project in existing account numbered 44.1570.100 and 44.1570.415.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Racine County Board of Supervisors that the funds available will be transferred as set forth in Exhibit "A" that is attached hereto to a new account number.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Racine County Board of Supervisors that the County Board Chairman, the County Clerk, and/or the County Executive are authorized to sign any necessary documents or contracts to carry out the intent of this resolution.

1st Reading

2nd Reading

BOARD ACTION Adopted ~ t5 For 19 Against 0 Absent J.--

VOTE REQUIRED: 2/3 Majority

Prepared by: Public Works & Development Services Department

Respectfully submitted,

AND FACILITIES

1 Resolution No. 2016-70 2 PageTwo 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The foregoing legislation adopted by the County Board of Supervisors of 17 Racine County, Wisconsin, is hereby: 18 19 Approved: __ 20 Vetoed: 21

22 Dare: -------~ 23 24 25 Jonathan Delagrave, County Executive 26 27

Resolution No. 2016-70 Page Three

INFORMATION ONLY

WHEREAS, the Racine County Department of Public Works and Development Services has received bids for planned 2016 highway improvements; and

WHEREAS, the cost for planned 2016 highway projects is lower than expected resulting in the availability of funds for additional highway improvements; and

WHEREAS, Count Trunk Highway (CTH) D, from State Street to State Trunk Highway (STH) 36 in the Village of Rochester, is scheduled for improvement; and

WHEREAS, resurfacing CTH "D", from State Street to STH 36 will take advantage of available funds.

Jul-26-2016

PWDS Roads Capital CTH V CTH G to North Co Une Completed Bond Projects

FISCAL NOTE- RESOLUTION NO. 2016-70

44.1570.415 44.1570.100 TOTAL SOURCES

EXHIBIT"A"

1,800,000 145,089

1 '700,276 (225,000)

145,089 --o:< 1=4=5,"=0'='89,._) (370,089)

New Ace!- CTH D Resurfacing New Ace! 370,089 TOTAL USES

FINANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

After reviewing the Resolution/Ordinance and fiscal infonmation supplied, your Finance Committee recommends FOR-AGAINST adoption. REASONS

FOR

370,089

0

AGAINST

Fiscal Year. 2016

1,575,000 1,475,276

370,089 370,089