Vigour, Vitality, and Vigour, Vitality, and VirtueVirtue::

How to stay awake in church:How to stay awake in church:Breathing new life into Breathing new life into

AnglicanismAnglicanism

What is our present status as a Christian community?Is the church a little ill, slightly pale

perhaps, or just aged and sleepy?

How can we re-en-passion the church – lift it from malaise and rise up in the Spirit of God to become a mighty, current, informed, prophetic and, at the very least, interesting voice in this mad, wonderful,

and broken world? 

OUR PURPOSE IS…

1.What does the global Christian picture look like?2.What is the current status of the Anglican Church today?

• And what about the Diocese of Johannesburg?3.Why is the Anglican Church in decline?4.What might some of our options be:

• Option 1• Option 2• Option 3• Option 4

5.Some recommended principles6.Discussion7.Close

1.What does the global Christian picture look like?

Global data upend usual picture of Christianity trendsPosted on: March 19, 2013 10:48 AM Despite a century-long decline, religious affiliation has shown a marked resurgence … Africa and China have witnessed the most marked religious change. These are among the findings discussed by religious demographer Dr Todd M. Johnson in an overview of religious identity and trends in world Christianity since 1910, presented at the Ecumenical Centre, Geneva, on 13 March. Hosted by the World Council of Churches (WCC) programme on Ecumenical Theological Education, Johnson’s lecture preceded his participation in a WCC sponsored conference about the pedagogical uses of work from research centres on global Christianity.The CSGC’s data stretches from 1910 to 2010 and fully confirm the large-scale southward shift in Christianity’s centre of gravity. Yet the global character of the data also yields some striking trends.The data also illustrate that … Africa has witnessed strong growth in Christian affiliation during the last 100 years, from 9 to 47.9 percent claiming Christian affiliation.Migration has become a large factor in religious demographics, dramatically altering the religious make-up of some nations. The CSGC’s research shows that statistics on Evangelical and Pentecostal groups are difficult to compile, since the charismatic trend goes beyond denominational affiliations.

Fastest growth over the century was seen in the category of agnostics and atheists…

He argued that while the discipline of religious demography is emergent, its initial findings about the changing landscape of global religious life pose deep questions about enculturation, theological formulation, and church organization.

?

Christianity Declines In Europe, Increases in Africa and Asia, Says SurveyBy Setrige Crawford , Christian Post ReporterDecember 23, 2011|3:29 pm

The number of Christians in Africa, Asia and the Americas are on the rise, while Christianity is declining in Europe, according to a new survey.A U.S.-based Pew Forum reports that the number of Christians in the world is currently 2.18 billion, which is one third of the world’s population. Back then, 66.3 percent of the world’s Christians were Europeans, according to reports. That number, however, has dropped to 25.9 percent. Sub-Saharan Africa’s Christian population is up from 1.4 percent in 1910 to 23.6 percent.

Evangelical Churches Still Growing, Mainline Protestantism In Decline By Richard YeakleyReligion News Service

 While mainline Protestant churches in the U.S. continue to experience decades-long decline, the memberships of Pentecostal traditions are on the rise, according to new figures compiled by the National Council of Churches… Catholics posted minimal growth of less than 1 percent, and Southern Baptist membership fell for a third straight year, according to the 2011 Yearbook of American & Canadian Churches… Other denominations reporting declines include the United Methodist Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and the Episcopal Church …

The percentage of American adults who identify themselves as Christians dropped from 86% in 1990 to 77% in 2001. This is an unprecedented drop of almost 1 percentage point per year.There appears to be a major increase in interest in spirituality among North Americans. However, this has not translated into greater church involvement.At the present rates of change, Islam will become the dominant religion in the world before 2050

At the present rate of change, most Americans would identify themselves as non-religious or non-Christian by the year 2035 Agnostics, Atheists, secularists. and NOTAs (none of the above) are growing rapidly.

2. What is the current status of the Anglican Church today?

Monday 20 May 2013

Census figures show Christianity in sharp decline while belief in Islam dramatically increasesHEATHER SAUL

A fresh analysis of the 2011 census has shown that Christian faith in the UK is declining rapidly amongst the British-born population, whilst belief in Islam has dramatically increased. A report published by the Office for National Statistics revealed that the percentage of people following a Christian faith dropped from 71.7 per cent in 2001 to 59.3 per cent in 2011. More than one in 10 under 25s in the UK now describe themselves as Muslim.  Figures for Christianity were boosted however by the 1.2 million foreign-born Christians residing in the UK, such as Polish Catholics and evangelicals from countries such as Nigeria. Meanwhile, the percentage of the people who have no religion rose from 14.8 per cent to 25% of the population.

• And what about the Diocese of Johannesburg?

No up-to-date available stats, but trend seems to be the same as the European trend, but at a slower pace, why?Because we live in a mixed demographic

What we do know is that in 1995 there were 13000 members on our Parish Rolls, today there are…

13000 members on our Parish Rolls!!!!

Johannesburg has seen a growth in population of 21% in the same time-frame, which effectively means….. That proportionately, we have declined by 21% since 1995

HOWEVER!!!!!!

The South African Survey 2009/2010/2012, says that;

In 1980 there were 845 420

In 1996 there were 1 600 001 - this is massive growth – why?In 2001 there were 1 722 076 – since 1980 this is growth of a massive 103.7% Whereas since 2001 these figures are again proportionately declining…..

As a matter of interest, the ZCC has grown by 546% over the same period – why?

As a matter of interest…

The South African Survey 2012 says that:

According to WIN-Gallup International, a market research and polling orgnisation, the richer people are, the less they define themselves as religious. The organisations’ Global index of religiosity lists South African among 10 countries with a notable decline (19%) of religious people between 2005-2012. p 82

Just another interesting, and cautionary note….. Although an established church, the Church of England does not receive any direct government support. Donations comprise its largest source of income, and it also relies heavily on the income from its various historic endowments. On 17 May 2012 The Church of England welcomed an agreement with the Government over the future funding of alterations and repairs to its 12,500 listed buildings, to the tune of 42 million pounds per yearMeanwhile, the Church moved the majority of its income-generating assets (which in the past included a great deal of land, but today mostly take the form of financial stocks and bonds) out of the hands of individual clergy and bishops to the care of a body called the Church Commissioners, which uses these funds to pay a range of non-parish expenses, including clergy pensions and the expenses of cathedrals and bishops’ houses. These funds amount to around 8 billion pounds…

The Anglican Church in Southern African is currently 4.5 million

of Rand in the red!!!

Recall , from our previous slides, that the centre of Christian gravity has shifted from the Northern to the Southern hemispheres – most notably

central and Southern Africa.That said, what ‘kind’ or ‘expression’ of Christianity is this, and why is it

so?The answer to this question reveals itself as we address the next section

of this presentation!

Whichever way we look at it, the financial health of the church must to some degree be a reflection of its overall health – theologically, spiritually, liturgically and so on…

3. Why is the Anglican Church in decline?

WHO (OR WHAT) CAUSED THE DECLINE IN MEMBERSHIP IN THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH

By The Rev. William R. Coats

I will argue that the largest contributor to our membership loss is not the drift to liberalism but a sharp decline in the birth rate among those descended from the British Isles or Northern Europe - our essential "tribal" base. If one assumes that the church has traditionally "grown" or replenished itself not through evangelism but simply through the addition of its own children, it would follow that a decline in numbers of those who "come up through the system" would account for the overall decline in numbers… We have always ‘grown' primarily by bringing our children up through the ranks, as it were. Indeed, until very recently, seminaries were training parish priests not to "grow" their churches but to preside and maintain what was perceived to be a naturally expanding institution. The drop in numbers of children per household, therefore, would seriously affect the overall membership in our church and becomes a possible explanation for the Episcopal Church's decline in overall numbers.

http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/dojustice/j325.html

And a complex of other reasons…

There is a direct, albeit complex correlation between the EXTENT and TYPES of religious subscription and: 

1.Political stability

2.Access to the economy

3.The quality of education

4.The roll of the country/community in the global arena

5.Exposure to internationalisation

6.Socio-cultural heritage

7. Reconfiguration of the concept of family

Measuring Church Growth: by Carl S. Dudley - is professor of church and community at McCormick Theological Seminary in Chicago. This article appeared in the Christian Century  June 6-13, 1979, p. 635.

Mainline churches will not “win back” lost members by imitating the successful programs by which other groups secure the loyalties of other populations. Our problems are more complex and challenging.

There is a clear correlation between literalist, conservative,

and doctrinaire versions of Christianity and the variables

listed above.

4. What might some of our options be?

There is a tendency to focus attention on the church as an ‘institution’ comprising

physical, ceremonial, and ideological precepts when we are concerned about its growth. Attention is often paid to its

organisation, management, administration, process, legislation, and strategy – its vision, mission, goals, and objectives, it rites, rituals, and liturgies. A

great deal of time and energy is spent, and rightly so, on these types of

initiatives. But what if the main cause of decline is not about it as an

institution? What if the main cause of decline is

about its theology?

• Option 1 Stay as we are… there is no need

for change.

• Option 2 Revert to

literalist/fundamentalist paradigms

• Option 3 Opt for a kind of new liberalism

(Emerging Church)

• Option 4 Is there another option?

So, what might some obvious options be?

IT DOES DEPEND, TO A SIGNIFICANT ExTENT,ON HOW WE “SEE” OUR FAITH – HOW WE “PERCEIVE” JESUS…

What millennials really want from the church is not a change in

style but a change in substance.

WHY MILLENNIALS ARE LEAVING THE CHURCHOpinion by Rachel Held Evans, Special

to CNN

The pros and cons of option 1The pros and cons of option 1““Stay as we are… there is no need Stay as we are… there is no need

for changefor change””PROS…

1.No intervention is required2.Retain present “stability”3.No disruption to the church4.Familiar and comfortable

CONS…

1.Nothing happens!

The pros and cons of option 2The pros and cons of option 2““Revert to literalist paradigmsRevert to literalist paradigms””

PROS…

1.Possesses the “Truth”2.Provides certainty in the midst of uncertainty3.Offers guarantees4.Strongly bonded and community oriented5.Very protective of adherents6.Clear sense of identity7.Therefore reduces anxiety8.Has definitive answers to the world’s problems9.Clear moral, ethical codes, lifestyles10.Adherents are often very happy

CONS…

1.Does not permit freedom of thought or open learning2.Can’t always deliver on its promises3.Highly discriminatory : “we are right, everybody else is wrong”4.Can become tribal and defensive5.Tends to indoctrinate rather than inform6.Is often authoritarian and autocratic7.Biblical inerrancy and inspiration leads to prejudice (genderism etc)8.Often imposes guilt and fear9.Can lead to violence in extreme cases10.Can be oppressive and abusive

The pros and cons of option 3The pros and cons of option 3““Opt for a kind of new Opt for a kind of new

liberalismliberalism””PROS…

1.Is very hospitable to difference2.Very inclusive3.Intellectually open4.Highly adaptable5.Strong sense of justice6.Very active in the wider world7.Is interesting because it draws in new information8.Is very aware of human rights issues and equality9.Is in touch with secular issues10.Often embraces deep spirituality

CONS…

1.Can become ‘wishy-washy’2.Has no clear sense of identity3.Can be too compromising and become disoriented4.Tends to cater for intellectual elites5.Can develop superiority complexes6.Can become too esoteric7.Can become too critical of traditionalists/conservatives8.May be out of touch with ‘grass-roots’ issues9.Can struggle to find a focussed vision10.Tends to attract “goofballs”

Kevin Ward’s research indicates that in 1947 the vast majority of the population believed in a personal God, whereas the majority in 1993 preferred the idea of God as an impersonal Spirit (Ward 2004:5). This shift need not be perceived as a movement against God, but as a plea for deeper, trans-dogmatic experience of a God less territorialised by institutionalised religious framing. Wade Roof’s research among baby boomers also found that 73% preferred to use the language of ‘spirituality’ rather than ‘religion’. Religion, according to these findings; ‘... connotes rigid, authoritarian, oppressive institutions; dogmatism and lack of openness to alternative perspectives, and cold formalism or ritualism. Spirituality, by contrast, suggests flexibility and creativity; tolerance and respect for alternative insights from others; room for doubt and searching; and an emphasis upon personal experience’ (Roof 1993: np). This statistics would since have changed, but the impetus is clear: the fact that religious apperceptions are in a state of flux is undeniable.

Why is this kind of liberalism so popular now?

THE CONCEPT OF THE CONCEPT OF

‘EMERGENCE’‘EMERGENCE’

AND THE FUTURE OF THE AND THE FUTURE OF THE

CHRISTIAN FAITHCHRISTIAN FAITH• CHALLENGES AND

POSSIBILITIES• Dr Jeremy Jacobs

IN SIMPLER ENGLISH

Emergence is a word which describes the complexity and innovation of a property which

cannot be reduced to, or explained merely in terms of its

antecedents. IN EVEN SIMPLER ENGLISH

Emergence is a word which describes the novelty of a new ‘thing’ that cannot be explained only in terms of the old things

which made it up.

OR IN CLICHED PHRASE

The whole (if it is novel) is greater than the sum of its parts

Now, if you apply the principle of “emergence” to the Christian faith, and how it may develop

in the years to come, you get….1. Brian McLaren: The person most commonly associated with the movement. Former English professor who is now a pastor, traveling speaker, and author of several books. Recognized as one of TIME magazine's "25 Most Influential Evangelicals in America." His book,  A New Kind of Christian won an award of merit from Christianity Today in 2002. See also, A Generous Orthodoxy, which has achieved something akin to Scripture status in the Emerging Church movement. (website at  http://www.brianmclaren.net)

2. Tony Jones: National Coordinator of Emergent, an organized network of cooperating emerging ministries (http://www.emergentvillage.com/Site/index.htm). He is a doctoral fellow and senior research fellow in practical theology at Princeton Theological Seminary whose books have been highly influential in the movement.

3. Dan Kimball: Author of several books, including The Emerging Church; Vintage Christianity for New Generations (Christianity Today best book of 2004). (http://www.dankimball.com/vintage_faith).

4. Stanley Hauerwas: Professor of Theological Ethics at Duke Divinity School. Named "America's Best Theologian" in 2001 by TIME magazine. Heavily influenced by postmodern philosophers, he has in turn had a profound affect on the Emerging Church movement. Known to frequently use profanities in his speaking engagements.

5. Rob Bell: Pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church, in Grandville, Michigan. Author of Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith. (http://www.mhbcmi.org/findex.html).

http://www.apologeticsindex.org/291-emerging-church-teachings

1. Narrative, metaphor, and myth (with reason as its attentive aid) as more viable conveyors of spiritual ‘truth’ than dogma and doctrine.

2. Developing a new ‘idiom’ for religion.3. Creative and artistic pursuits of transformation rather than

subscription to creedal or catechetical legislations.4. Re-integrating science and biology as foundational to the

cultivation of spirituality (rather than villainising the ‘world and the flesh’).

5. Spontaneity and unpredictability over rigidity and certainty.

6. Multi-sensory, multi-tasking, multi-media, multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, but not confusion - seeking out complex synchronicities, not compromised pluralities.

7. Savouring the benefits of the heuristic process.8. Valuing mutual benefit over individual reward (a reaction

against post-modern individualism).9. Wide reaching righteousness and justice issues rather than

personal moralism.10.Strong aesthetic and materialistic values.

JUST A FEW DESCRIPTORS OF THE CHARACTER OF THE EMERGING SPIRITUALITY

Well, I don’t think any of the above are viable long-term

solutions…

The pros and cons of option 4The pros and cons of option 4“????????????????????????”“????????????????????????”

I have an idea, but discretion precedes presumption. Let me adopt the Socratic method

instead!

The Socratic method is simply the process of facilitating a discussion in such a way that people come upon the answers themselves because someone has

asked the right kinds of questions.

But maybe some basic principles will help us along….

5. Some recommended principles

1. The main theme of Jesus’ entire teaching, The Kingdom of Heaven, must always remain the central refrain of our faith.

2. The Kingdom of Heaven IS the Person and Spirit of Jesus himself – the true image and likeness of our own being – a template of our own spiritual becoming.

3. Our purpose is therefore to incarnate - to live ourselves increasingly into this Christ-likeness as the living presence of our loving God in the world today. This is our spiritual journey – our sanctification!

4. This Christ-likeness, as the presence of God’s love in and through our lives, is not: racist, sexist, egotistical, prejudicial, judgemental, discriminatory, exclusive, bigoted…

5. The ‘lived out’ gifts and fruits of the Spirit of Jesus there fore precede our various and differing beliefs about his earthly life-story.

6. Religious Truth is therefore not measured in the extent to which we blindly subscribe to dogmas and doctrines, but in our love for God, our neighbours, and ourselves AS disciples of Christ! (The first and great commandment…)

7. This form of Truth does not dismiss the place and purpose of dogma and doctrine – it merely apportions it to its rightful place – to serve God and humanity, not for God and humanity to be servile to it!

8. As such our worship must be exuberant, passionate, and deeply reflective of the indwelling Christ – “in whom we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28)

9. We need to cultivate a strong sense of identity as a community who are deeply in love with God in Christ – not necessarily as Biblical literalists, but as true servant leaders on a quest to bring the salvation of Christ to our broken world.

10.What is salvation in this sense other than the redeeming love of Christ which brings healing, reconciliation, wholeness, forgiveness, reverence, respect, and sanctity into EVERY aspect of our personal and corporate lives.

11.The sacrament of the altar, the Body and Blood of Christ thus pulses as the Spirit of Christ through our veins – how can we possibly claim this, live this, unless we love each other through our differences? Did Christ only die for those who subscribe to a particular religious ideology – or did he die for all?

12.If his love lived and died for all, then we must live and love all without prejudice.

13.And our pastoral heart, our relationships with each other and the world is the key to making all of this possible!

14.Also, in order to love this world, we must understand this world, and we must therefore study this world – in all its complex nuances and mysteries.

15.Our theology must therefore be SIGNIFICANTLY empowered by strong and on-going education – in all fields of research.

16.And so on and so on and so on…..

I PROPOSE THAT THE CHURCH, IF IT HOPES TO SURIVE, MUST HAVE:

1.A vigorous, committed, healthy, and passionate BODY2.A Pentecostal, Charismatic, and Evangelical SPIRIT3.A Spiritual/Mystical SOUL4.A liberal MIND5.A loving and compassionate HEART

We, the church, and the world are all in need of salvation – of restoration ,

healing, and sanctification. We will not succeed in doing this by legislating,

indoctrinating, organising, administering, strategizing, and visioning UNLESS the entire process is defined by the Love of

God in and through our Lord Jesus Christ.

In brief, we need to love ourselves, the church, and the world back into freedom,

and it all begins, continues, and succeeds through the integrity of our

relationships.

6.Discussion7.Close