natalienapolitanolsa.weebly.comnatalienapolitanolsa.weebly.com/uploads/2/5/8/5/...senior_project.docx ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Running Head: THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
The Right to Success: A Legal Analysis of the Prospects Afforded to Homeless Students
Natalie Napolitano
Legal Studies Academy at First Colonial High School
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Abstract
In the past decade, the number of homeless students has been significantly
increasing while the funding allotted to the programs that aid them has been radically
decreasing. Homeless students typically struggle with their academic life and even more
so if they are trying to balance any extra curricular activities as well. Because a stable
home is not available to these students, the hardships they face prevent them from
accessing the same opportunities for success that are available to housed students.
Therefore, the government has taken over the responsibility of ensuring that homeless
students are not discriminated against and are offered the same prospects that housed
students are. This paper will explore the pathways and legally provided aid that is and is
not available to homeless students. Along with aid, it will also break down the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Improvements Act, explore the
identification techniques used to discover homeless students, the budget assigned to
providing opportunities for the success of homeless students, and the legal consequences
of misidentification.
2
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
The Right to Success: A Legal Analysis of the Opportunities Afforded to Homeless
Students
A homeless student is defined as “a youth who lacks a fixed, regular, and
adequate nighttime residence.” This definition also includes “those who are ‘doubled up,’
or living in someone else’s home, and those who are living in hotels along with those
living in cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings, substandard housing, bus or
train stations, or similar settings” (“Definition of Homeless,” 2014).
The Reality of Homelessness
During the 2012-2013 school year, the homeless student rate in the U.S. increased
by eight percent, going from 1,168,354 to 1,258,182. As these numbers rise, the testing
scores for homeless students are going down because the funds granted are being spread
very thin. Statistics show that the percentage of homeless students “testing proficient in
reading and math declined each school year between 2010-2011 and 2012-2013,
dropping from a 52 percent to a 47 percent in reading last year and a 51 percent to a 44
percent in math” (Covert, 2014).
Receiving Deserved Opportunities
Through the Title VII act, all students are promised the right to attend a school
where they are “educated with their classmates,” rather than “segregated into special
classes” (Tobin, 2011, p.43). However, it costs “South Hampton Roads’ five cities
collectively[…] an estimated $31 million each year due” on homeless students in the
area. These high costs present a dilemma when wanting to provide homeless students
with all of the opportunities that are afforded to students who have a stable home (“Brutal
cost of children who are homeless,” 2014).
3
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Luckily, the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Improvements Act
provides funding to homeless students to give them the opportunities to succeed that all
high school students should receive (Laprade, 2010). Although this may seem like the
solution, this act tends to be vague in explaining methods to identifying homeless
students, and due to recent budget cuts, these fix-all funds are shrinking, leaving students
without their legally promised opportunities for success. Mrs. Donna Whiteside, the
social worker at First Colonial High School who provides aid to homeless students, said,
“The economy may be worse, but our business is still booming” (D. Whiteside, personal
communication, November 21st, 2014).
The Attempted Solution
The McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Improvements Act
This act was created to provide aid and opportunities to homeless students when
defined by 42 U.S. Code 11302 as:
“(1) an individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime
residence;
(2) an individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or
private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping
accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus
or train station, airport, or camping ground;
(3) an individual or family living in a supervised publicly or privately operated
shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangements (including hotels and
motels paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income
individuals or by charitable organizations, congregate shelters, and transitional
4
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
housing);
(4) an individual who resided in a shelter or place not meant for human habitation
and who is exiting an institution where he or she temporarily resided;
(5) an individual or family who—
(A) will imminently lose their housing, including housing they own, rent, or live
in without paying rent, are sharing with others, and rooms in hotels or motels not
paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income
individuals or by charitable organizations, as evidenced by—
(i) a court order resulting from an eviction action that notifies the individual or
family that they must leave within 14 days;
(ii) the individual or family having a primary nighttime residence that is a room in
a hotel or motel and where they lack the resources necessary to reside there for
more than 14 days;” (“General Definition of a Homeless Individual,” 2014).
The benefits that this act provides. Its benefits for these students include:
“immediate eligibility for free school meals; fees waived for school activities, including
registration fees and extracurricular activities; school supplies, uniforms, and other
necessary materials provided to the child; transportation to and from school of origin (the
school the child was attending before he became homeless); academic supports to ensure
success, including tutoring; and the removal of documentation barriers” (Crain, 2014).
The case law after the act. Although this act was supposed to fix all of the issues
presented by homeless students’ loss of rights, it didn’t. Cases still often arose dealing
with school systems that weren’t following the act and withholding funding from those
who needed it most.
5
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Salazar v. Edwards. A children’s class and a parent’s class were formed in 1992 to file a
“class action lawsuit in Illinois State Court against the Illinois State Board of Education,
the Illinois Coordinator for Homeless Children and Youth, the State Superintendent of
Education, the Chicago School Board, and the Chicago School Reform Board of
Trustees” (Malone 2006). This case was crucial in beginning the precedent for so many
other cases after it. The issues brought up in this case including the defendants
routinely den[ying] homeless children the opportunity to remain in their school of
origin, impos[ing] burdensome transfer requirements, den[ying] adequate and
timely transportation service, disregard[ing] the wishes of the parents, and
le[aving] children sitting in shelters for days and weeks without schooling.
A big part of the McKinney-Vento Act was the fact that homeless children are not to be
victims of discrimination. They are supposed to be able to have the same education with
their housed peers. The Illinois Board of Education denied them this right and “failed to
adopt policies to ensure that homeless children were not isolated or stigmatized.” At the
conclusion of the case the state of Illinois
eliminate[d] barriers to enrollment by creating new procedures for transfer,
maintenance of medical records, transportation, and eligibility for free or low cost
meals… [the state also] agreed to cease its ‘de facto’ policy of enrolling homeless
children in the school closest to the shelter they happen to be in.
This was a big achievement and blessing for the homeless students of Illinois; however, it
didn’t do much. It wasn’t until 1999, when the decision was already seven years old, that
the court finally enforced it. Although the rights were granted to every homeless student,
many were never made aware of those rights. It took the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the
6
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
laws to actually get the court to send homeless students issuances of their rights. This is a
clear example of the barriers that states can put up to get around the McKinney-Vento
Act (Malone 2006).
Allen and Shaw v. Hoover City Schools. In Alabama, two homeless students
were enrolled in a local high school and were never properly identified. Both boys said
that their football coach and other adults were aware of their homelessness, yet they were
never told their rights. Both young men claim that school employees also knew that they
were homeless and had been called out of class frequently to prove that they had been
living in a hotel through receipts and other documentation. The plaintiffs were each
required to complete transfer forms since the hotel they were living in was out of district,
but the McKinney Vento Act states that students can stay in whatever school they were
zoned for while in stable housing; no transfer forms are required. Also, transportation
was never provided for either plaintiff. They also were not given the resource of
academic support from the school’s homeless liaison, even when their grades started
slipping because they were forced to choose between academics and football while
struggling to find a place to sleep. Typically these kinds of cases are settled outside of
court; however, the plaintiffs in this case demanded a jury trial. On July 12th, 2014, the
plaintiffs agreed to mediation. No word has been released on the details of that mediation
(Crain, 2014).
Kaleuati v. Tonda. In Hawaii, many schools were not removing barriers for
homeless students to attend, a clear violation of the McKinney-Vento Act. They had been
receiving funds, yet they had made rules making it difficult for homeless students to pass
paperwork barriers and stay enrolled in their old school after becoming homeless. This
7
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
forced them to not only have an unstable home environment, but also an unstable school
environment because they were forced to keep changing schools. Homeless students in
Hawaii were also being denied the right to free, safe transportation. At the conclusion of
the case, the Department of Education and Hawaii School Board agreed to provide
transportation to these students by:
Hiring additional homeless liaisons on each island to assist homeless families in
navigating the public school system; informing homeless children and families of
their rights under the McKinney-Vento Act (most notably, a child's right to
remain in her or his current school – and receive transportation to that school –
even if the family moves outside of the school district in search of shelter);
conducting yearly trainings of school personnel, and make annual site visits to
schools and homeless shelters statewide; modifying [its] enrollment forms and
computer systems to facilitate the enrollment process and improve attendance for
homeless children; and taking affirmative steps to avoid stigmatizing homeless
families (ACLU Hawaii, 2008).
Daniel Gluck, the Senior Staff Attorney for the ACLU said, “These changes are long
overdue.” Olive Kaleauti said her sons, also plaintiffs in the case, were unsure of how
much they had done to help homeless students in Hawaii. All they had said was “We just
helped all the homeless students go to school now.” Little do these boys know, they
played a huge role in changing the lives of homeless students and giving them their
legally promised rights. These boys gave homeless students in Hawaii their legally
provided rights and eliminated yet another loophole in the McKinney-Vento Act (ACLU
Hawaii, 2008).
8
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Bethel v. Mountain Brook Schools. A traveling “fire-and-brimstone” preacher
alleged that her children were not being provided with their rights when they were
prevented from enrolling in an Alabama school. She claimed that they were homeless
because they were a nomadic family and that her children should be allowed to stay in the
same school that they had been enrolled in before moving. She also wanted them to be
able to stay in this same school throughout all of their moves so that she wouldn’t have to
complete notifications of a change in housing every time they moved. This case never
made it to court due to technicalities. These technicalities were specified as a lack of
allegations regarding herself as the harmed plaintiff. The judge dismissed the case
because she was just making allegations for her children, not the harm caused to her
(Thornton, 2011).
Defining the budget. Most recently, national school administration requested a
$2.406 billion budget but was only granted a $2.105 billion budget, leading to many
programs having to be cut. Thankfully, all Title 1A funding, a program that provides
assistance to schools in low socio-economic neighborhoods, automatically goes to
homeless students. Even though Title 1A funding will aid in making up for the decreased
budget, if there are still “insufficient funds available to allot the minimum amount to each
state, the allotments to states will be reduced based on the proportionate share that each
state received in the preceding fiscal year” (“The McKinney-Vento Act At a Glance,”
2008). This minimum amount of funding spoken about previously is $150,000 for each
state. Also, extra funding is awarded to school corporations through grants based on a
competitive basis considering the fact that some areas experience higher populations of
low socio-economic families.
9
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Problems with the McKinney-Vento Act
Lacking Success
Although this act was put in place to ensure that the rights of all students were
granted to them, it has many loopholes that make it easy for states to scoot by without
providing aid to homeless students. As seen in the cases above, many schools will refrain
from even identifying the homeless students in the first place, leading to no need for
funds at all. This, alongside other problems, is the reason that the McKinney-Vento Act
needs to be revised.
The hindrance of inevitable budget cuts. Looking at our country’s financial
situation, it is safe to say that budget cuts will continue to come and hit hard for many
years to come. Budget cuts will leave these students without the opportunities that are
supposed to be provided to all students. They could affect the testing and academics of
these students drastically because the homeless student population is, unfortunately,
increasing rapidly which is bringing the consistent need for more funding. We can’t claim
to protect them and take care of them but not provide the resources that they need to
succeed in school and extra curricular activities.
More than budget cuts. Budget cuts are not the only problem homeless students
seeking an education face. There are many faculty members who fail to identify homeless
students in the first place. Some schools have more homeless students than others and are
spreading their funds very thin. Despite the McKinney-Vento Act, there are many schools
that still set up barriers to prevent homeless students from getting an education at their
school. As seen in Kaleauti v. Tonda, these barriers are illegal, yet very real. Hawaii had
been getting away with them for years before it was brought to the court’s attention that
10
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
they violated the McKinney-Vento Act. A big reason that schools do things like this is
that they don’t want to pay for the transportation. Bus route changes can be very
expensive. States such as Hawaii are more prone to disobeying the act because of their
very high population of homeless people, leading to a higher population of homeless
children and students. They fear that the funding may not be enough to cover all of their
children (ACLU Hawaii, 2008).
Finding a Solution
The ideal solution, of course, would be more money. If somehow congress could
fit more funding for homeless student education into their budget then all would be a lot
better. Although this would be a wonderful solution, in reality budget cuts are taking
place, and there is no room for more funding. Another solution would be the sponsorship
of the Student Financial Aid office of the U.S. Department of Education. This office
works behind the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or the FAFSA. By working
with this office grants could be set up specifically for homeless students and schools
could use those grants to offer more waived fees for opportunities such as multiple
Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SATs), Advanced Placement (AP) tests, college application
fees, and fees required to send transcripts and test scores to schools the students are
applying to. Senior year can be expensive, especially for students who are homeless.
Working with the Student Financial Aid office, schools would hopefully be able to take
away some of those costs (Roos, 2010).
11
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
The Role of the Faculty and Staff
The Need to Identify
Homeless identifiers are often nurses, school social workers, or homeless liaisons
that are referred to take a closer look at students by teachers and other school faculty. A
school social worker deals with all children, homeless or not, and provides them with aid
and guidance through their hardships. Meanwhile, a homeless liaison is someone who
specializes in just the area of homelessness and the laws that surround it. Every school is
required to have a homeless liaison or social worker to go through the students’ rights
and paperwork, or lack thereof, with them. There are conferences held annually for these
identifiers to train them on the characteristics of homeless students and any new
opportunities that have been afforded to them as well as teach them how to train the
faculty and staff back at their schools.
These liaisons are also the people who are responsible for identifying the students
so that the can present them with their rights in the first place. However, homeless
liaisons are often not interacting with all of the students in the school on a daily basis.
Therefore, the responsibility of identification of homeless students falls to the other
faculty and staff members, more frequently the teachers. Because teachers are face to
face with students all day, they have a better opportunity to identify those who they
believe might be homeless and possibly keep a closer eye on them or notify the homeless
liaison (Tobin, 2011, p. 48, p.115).
Teaching the Teachers
Although there are trained liaisons in every state, teachers do not receive any
specific training pertaining to homeless student identification. It is, therefore, the liaisons’
12
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
job to teach the teachers about how to identify these students and hand them to the
liaisons to work with. Most of the time, these lessons will be held on professional
development days or staff workdays. There have been many attempts at teaching the
teachers the key characteristics of a homeless student, but more often than not the
technique that works best is enhancing sensitization. Sensitization means making the
teachers more aware of they difficulties that homeless students face. The goal of
sensitization is to make teachers aware of the things that a homeless student might not be
able to do and grow their willingness to adapt assignments to fit the particular needs of
that certain student. For example, if the student is required to type an essay over the
weekend and does not have access to a computer, the teacher can offer to let the student
stay after school to use a computer or simply allow them to handwrite it. Typically, when
the teachers are sensitized to the hardships that homeless students face, they are more
willing to keep an eye out for them. By sensitizing the staff, they also learn the
characteristics of the students and are able to leave these lessons with a better
understanding on the effects that homelessness has on a student’s behavior, grades, and
overall attitude about school. Because they are taught on professional development days,
there is no need for them to go out of their way to attend a lesson. The homeless liaison at
each school, already an expert on the topic at hand, will normally teach the lesson so that
no extra money or work is needed to bring someone in to host the lesson (Tobin, 2011, p.
48, p.115).
A Lesson for All
While a lot of focus is placed on teachers, students are also a very important
factor in identifying their homeless peers. The only people who are with homeless
13
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
students while in the educational workplace more than the teachers are their fellow
students. A homeless student may feel more comfortable confiding to a friend or peer
about their situation rather than an adult. Students need to be aware of what to do with
this kind of information if it ever comes to them. There have been many suggestions as to
how to make students aware of the situation that their homeless peers face. It’s often
recommended that an assembly of sorts is held, usually conducted by the school’s
homeless liaison or social worker to provide basic information on what characteristics to
look for as well as how to help that person once they have concluded that they are
homeless. Privacy is a big part of this student training. Homelessness is a very sensitive
topic, especially for the children who are experiencing it. Throughout training for
students, it needs to be emphasized that this is a very private matter and should be
handled that way. Other suggestions have been after school awareness activities or clubs
and “some researchers (e.g., Nunez) have gone so far as to publish children’s picture
books about homelessness for use in the elementary school classroom” (Tobin, 2011, p.
48).
Budgeting Identification
A big issue that has risen in the past few years is the budget for the training of
teachers and students. Because the budget that the homeless students receive is already so
limited, and growing smaller still, schools are reluctant to provide lessons to train them
because they don’t have the money. However, teacher training is often free if held on
professional development days, making it a very beneficial training session to hold.
Student lessons, on the other hand, are a harder endeavor to pursue. Students don’t have
professional development days or anything to that extent as teachers do, and
14
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
administrators are often reluctant to cut into class time to host an assembly. The best way
to inform students how to be a support system for their peers is to hold an after school
activity or start a club dedicated to helping homeless students and knowing how to
support them rather than pick them out through identification traits. Despite the fact that
there is no budget to support student training, they are still a crucial part of identifying
homeless peers and need to have the knowledge and sensitization that faculty and staff
receive.
Closer To Home
At First Colonial High School, our social worker, Mrs. Donna Whiteside, is
shared with Cook Elementary. However, due to the high quantity of homeless students at
First Colonial, she spends most of her time here. Mrs. Whiteside plays a huge role in the
lives of homeless students in Virginia Beach. Because the First Colonial school zone is
down at the beach, all of the students who are living in hotels are zoned for First Colonial
giving the school the highest homeless student population, forty students, in all of
Virginia Beach.
Typically, Mrs. Whiteside will discover that a student is homeless when they
come to enroll at First Colonial. Instead of providing an address the family is allowed to
check a box labeled “homeless” and speak to Mrs. Whiteside later. Although many
homeless students are identified through this process, even more are not. In these cases,
Mrs. Whiteside has discovered their situation in a variety of ways. Sometimes she is
contacted directly from the shelter that the student is housed in. Other times students will
confide in teachers and peers who in turn will come to Mrs. Whiteside. The majority of
the time, students will be identified as homeless when the school mails something out and
15
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
their address is not their own or the mail is returned back to the school. In this case Mrs.
Whiteside will go out and investigate and try to find and speak to the family so she can
give the homeless student the opportunities that they deserve.
Teacher and peers play such a big role in a homeless student’s life. Therefore, it is
important that they know who to come to when their student or peer confides in them that
they are homeless or near homeless.
Mrs. Whiteside tries her best to check in with her students weekly. She makes
sure that they are receiving food, clothing, school supplies, and any other things that they
need to succeed. She has found that although many students know their rights and have
been experiencing this since an early age, many are still unaware of the full extent of
their rights, which is why it is so important to identify and notify them. Teachers and
students need to be made aware of the characteristics of a homeless student and part of
Mrs. Whiteside’s job as the school social worker is to make them aware of that. She has
never personally held an assembly or training session for students and teachers, but she
works with students through First Colonial’s family connection program, which provides
food and toiletries to our homeless families, and will often discuss the situation of a
homeless student to their teachers if the student is ok with it. She disclosed the homeless
student’s hardships and provides a sort of sensitization to the teachers who have that
student so that they are able to accommodate their requirements to better fit the homeless
student’s needs (D. Whiteside, personal communication, November 21st, 2014).
16
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
The “Timely Manner” Consequences
The Vagueness of the Law
The McKinney-Vento Act states that homeless students are supposed to be
identified within a timely manner but never truly specifies exactly what that timely
manner is. However, it is safe to assume that it means sometime before the student
graduates high school. As seen in Allen and Shaw v. Hoover City Schools there is a clear
legal consequence of not identifying a homeless student in a timely manner. The goal is
to find out that a student is homeless as soon as possible, but this can be very difficult if
the student does their best to keep it a secret. As long as homeless students are turned in
as soon as they are identified, there is no legal consequence. The issue in Allen and Shaw
v. Hoover City Schools was that there were adults and school personnel who were aware
of the plaintiffs’ homelessness yet refrained from informing them of their rights,
opportunities, and resources granted by the McKinney Vento Act. The plaintiffs had no
idea that they were missing out on funds and resources until after they graduated. These
withheld opportunities could’ve made their high school experience a lot easier, or as easy
as it could’ve been without a stable home (Crain, 2014). A timely manner is clearly not
after the student has already graduated. There is no clear timely manner constituted in the
McKinney Vento Act, something that desperately needs to be cleared up as soon as
possible.
The Legal Consequences
It is unknown exactly what the consequences are considering the fact that the
terms of the mediation in Allen and Shaw v. Hoover City Schools were not released. It is
fairly safe to assume that there was monetary compensation involved in the mediation of
17
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
this case because the plaintiffs asked for money and desperately wanted a jury trial.
Because the school system didn’t want this getting too big, they brought about the
settlement to leave the case in mediation. Either way, there needs to be a clearer
definition of when homeless students are supposed to have been identified. Without this,
other schools may push off the identification process in order to save money.
A Time for Change
The Initial Problem
Although there are many little problems that arise in the pursuit of an equal
education for homeless students, there are two that stand out: the lack of funding and the
vagueness of the McKinney-Vento act. There must be funds allotted to homeless students
by congress. Children are promised a free public education from a very young age. We
cannot take that away from anyone if we want to see them succeed. If money isn’t
allotted to these students, then they will suffer and, statistically, end up a homeless adult
as well.
The McKinney-Vento Act has definitely helped in the advancement of the
awareness of homeless student educational needs but it still needs a lot of work. There is
nowhere near enough information and specifics within the act to give these students all
that they need. Some of the issues in this act include: failure to define a “timely manner,”
lack of specification of identification techniques, and many loopholes that provide
opportunities for school systems to set up barriers to education. This act desperately
needs to be revised because it is against the law for students to not receive their rightful
public education, despite whether or not they are homeless. There is an act trying to pass
congress to provide revisions to the McKinney-Vento Act to change a few specifications;
18
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
however, after reading over the revisions, the act seemed even more vague if they were to
be added (Tracking the McKinney-Vento Act Revisions, 2014). The vagueness of this act
is the main problem in the first place. The act needs more specifications such as the time
frame that a faculty member has to identify a homeless student without legal
consequences. It also needs to provide identifying characteristics and a requirement for
faculty members to learn how to recognize those characteristics. Pending the fact that
legal consequences do arise from faculty not identifying homeless students in a timely
manner, there needs to be a definite statement of the punishment, or lack there of, that
will result from it.
The Solution
Society urgently needs to sit down and establish the ins and outs of giving an
education to homeless students. Just because they are homeless does not mean they don’t
deserve an education that is just as great as the one that housed students receive. There
needs to be a definite budget set in the McKinney-Vento Act or through another law so
that it can never be cut, or if it is cut there needs to be an alternative source of funding
available. Also, the McKinney-Vento Act needs to be revised as soon as possible. This
act has done some to help homeless students, but there are too many loopholes and it is
entirely too vague to continue being a source of support for the students.
19
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
References
42 U.S. Code § 11302 - General definition of homeless individual. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 12, 2014, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/11302
Abledinger, J. (n.d.). Educational Rights of Homeless Children and Youths. Retrieved
November 7, 2014, from
http://sogpubs.unc.edu/electronicversions/slb/slbfal04/article1.pdf
Brutal cost of children who are homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved from http%3A%2F
%2Fhamptonroads.com%2F2014%2F10%2Fbrutal-cost-children-who-are-
homeless
Cartner, J. C., & Barbosa, T. (2007). Texas public elementary schoolteachers' knowledge
and attitudes toward homeless students (Master's thesis, University of
Phoenix). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 192-N/a. Retrieved October 7,
2014, from ProQuest Education Journals.
Copyright - Copyright ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2007 Last
updated - 2014-01-10 First page - n/a SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Texas
Chavez, S. M. (2009, March 01). Number of homeless students rising in Dallas-area
districts. McClatchy - Tribune Business News. Retrieved October 7, 2014, from
ProQuest Newsstand.
Counseling 101 column. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.nasponline.org/resources/principals/nassp_homeless.aspx
20
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
The critical moment. (1963). London: The Times Publishing Company. Retrieved
November 7, 2014, from
http://www.naehcy.org/sites/default/files/images/dl/critical_mom.pdf
CWRU law students file suit on behalf of Akron’s homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved November
7, 2014, from http%3A%2F%2Fobserver.case.edu%2Fcwru-law-students-file-
suit-on-behalf-of-akrons-homeless%2F
The economic crisis hits home. (n.d.). Economic Crisis Hits Home. Retrieved November
7, 2014, from
http://www.naehcy.org/sites/default/files/images/dl/TheEconomicCrisisHitsHo
me.pdf
Education for homeless students. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.education.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/us_codes/7505/
education_for_homeless_youth/806365
Fla. pitcher spotlighted in sports illustrated look at homeless student athletes. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://extracredit.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2014/10/21/fla-pitcher-spotlighted-
in-sports-illustrated-look-at-homeless-student-athletes/
Homeless athletes: The power of sports. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014.
Homeless children & youth education. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2014, from
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/hs/cy/
Homeless high school athlete beats the odds. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.wfla.com/story/27325327/homeless-high-school-athlete-beats-the-
odds
21
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Homeless students especially vulnerable to academic setbacks, educators say. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 14, 2014, from
http://patch.com/minnesota/burnsville/homelessness-in-schools
Homeless students’ federal court Case Here could impact children nationwide. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://alabamaschoolconnection.org/2014/01/31/homeless-students-federal-
court-case-here-could-impact-children-nationwide/
Homeless students suing easton area School District can return to school pending judge's
ruling - update. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/easton/index.ssf/2013/12/lawsuit_easton_are
a_school_dis.html
How the FAFSA works. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2014, from
http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/college-planning/financial-
aid/fafsa.htm
Increase access to housing and services for homeless children and youth. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 7, 2014, from
http://www.naehcy.org/legislation-and-policy/legislative-updates/hcya-july-
2014
James, B. W. (2003). Transporting homeless students to increase stability: A case study
of two texas districts. The Journal of Negro Education, 72(1, Student Mobility:
How Some Children Get Left Behind), 126-140. Retrieved November 7, 2014,
from http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/briefs/identification.pdf
22
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Laprade, P. (2010). Homelessness: The most frequently asked questions. The Choral
Journal, 50(8), 43-50. Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.naehcy.org/sites/default/files/images/dl/naehcy_faq.pdf
Law project accomplishments - Chicago coalition for the homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 24, 2014, from http://www.chicagohomeless.org/programs-
campaigns/legal-aid/law-project/law-project-accomplishments/
Losinski, M., Katsiyannis, A., & Ryan, J. B. (2013). The McKinney-Vento education for
homeless children and youth program: Implications for special educators.
Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(2), 92-98. doi:
10.1177/1053451213493170
Malone, S. (n.d.). Salazar v. Edwards. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from
http://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=2
The Maryland people's law library. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014, from
http://www.peoples-law.org/homeless-students-and-school
Mckinney-Vento 2001 – Law Into Practi. (n.d.). Law into Practice- Homeless Education:
Including Children and Youth Experiencing Homelessness in State and Local
School District Accountability Systems. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from
http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/briefs/accountability.pdf
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act: Expediting identification for displaced
students. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2014, from
http://www.cde.state.co.us/dropoutprevention/expeditingmckinneyid
McKinney-Vento homeless assistance grants. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from
http://www.endhomelessness.org/pages/mckinneyvento_HAG
23
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
McKinney-Vento homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from http%3A%2F
%2Fwww.doe.in.gov%2Fstudent-services%2Fmckinney-vento-homeless
Miller, P. M. (2009, September). Leadership practice in service of homeless students: an
examination of community perceptions. The Urban Review, 41(3), 222-250.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0107-9
Copyright - Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 Last updated - 2014-
07-19 SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - United States
Murphy, J. F. (2011). Homelessness comes to school: How homeless children and youths
can succeed. The Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 32-37. Retrieved November 7,
2014.
Number of homeless students hits all time high. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2014,
from http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/09/23/there-are-
more-homeless-students-now-than-ever-before
One million students homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from
http://www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=3756883
Practi, M. —. (n.d.). The McKinney-Vento act at a glance. McKinney-Vento — Law into
Practice the McKinney-Vento Act at a Glance. Retrieved November 14, 2014,
from http://center.serve.org/nche/downloads/briefs/reauthorization.pdf
S., Centre, M. S., 600 East Main Street, Suite 300, & Richmond, V. 2. (n.d.). Virginia’s
Homeless Programs 2010-11 Program Year.
Scores of CPS homeless students persevere despite hardships. (2014, November 14).
Retrieved November 14, 2014, from
http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=231276
24
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Sports illustrated examines young athletes who are homeless. (n.d.). Retrieved November
7, 2014, from
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/education_and_the_media/2014/10/sports_illu
strated_examines_young_athletes_who_are_homeless.html
State to provide homeless children with equal access to public education. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 14, 2014, from https://www.aclu.org/racial-
justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/state-provide-
homeless-children-eq
State to provide homeless children with equal access to public education. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 7, 2014, from https://www.aclu.org/racial-
justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/state-provide-
homeless-children-eq
Title 1, part a program. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from http%3A%2F
%2Fwww2.ed.gov%2Fprograms%2Ftitleiparta%2Findex.html%5C
Tobin, K. J. (1969). Identifying best practices for homeless students. Journal of Inter-
American Studies, 11(2), 342-344. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from
http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212011-135524/unrestricted/
Tobin_dissertation_final.pdf
Tracking the McKinney Vento Act revisions. (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from
https%3A%2F%2Fwww.govtrack.us%2Fcongress%2Fbills%2F113%2Fs2653
Washington State Requirements and Guidance for Homeless Education. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 04, 2014, from
http://www.k12.wa.us/homelessed/assistanceact.aspx
25
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS
Whiteside, D. (2014, November 21). Social workers role in the school system [Personal
interview].
Grading Rubric for “Almost Final” Draft
Criterion 4 -- Advanced
3 – Above Average
2 – Proficient 1 -- Emerging
Mechanics, Grammar, Spelling
Zero to very few errors
A few errors Several errors Many errors inhibit the reading of the text
Academic Voice
Academic language used throughout paper
Academic language used through most of paper
Academic language used for some of paper
Paper lacks academic language – informal throughout
Usage, Sentence Structure
Zero to very few errors
A few errors Several errors Many errors inhibit reading of text
Title, Abstract, Body, Reference
All present and correct
All present – needs to fix a few errors
Missing 1 item Missing 2+ items
Uniform LSA Scoring convention
16 = 100 12 = 88 8 = 76 4 = 6415 = 97 11 = 85 7 = 73
14 = 94 10 = 82 6 = 7013 = 91 9 = 79 5 = 67
Please do the following for final:Grade for this draft - 95
Fix all marked errors.
After they are fixed, just resend it to me.
26
THE RIGHT TO SUCCESS 27