vesuvius 2000 - cost c26 international conference · urban habitat constructions under catastrophic...
TRANSCRIPT
Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic EventsFINAL CONFERENCE. Naples, 16th- 18th September 2010Chair of the Action: Federico Mazzolani, IT, [email protected] Science Officer: Thierry Goger, [email protected]
COST Action C26
THE VESUVIUS CASE STUDY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EU COST ACTION C26 ACTIVITY
Federico Mazzolani (1), Maurizio Indirli (2)
(1) University of Naples “Federico II”, Italy; (2) ENEA Bologna, Italy
The Vesuvius extreme dangerousness induced the WG4 to introduce the ‘Vesuvius case study’ within its research activities, with particular regard to the effects on the constructions produced by a possible eruption.
The Working Group 4 (“Risk Assessment for Catastrophic Scenarios in Urban Areas”) has been devoted to any natural hazard except earthquake. The focus has been pointed on identification, characterization and modeling of natural disasters,
construction response and possible relevant consequences of combined extreme loadings in the built environment.
Since the beginning, the work seemed too huge without a robust “Ariadne's thread” to follow. Therefore, three directions have been identified for the research:
a) the investigation on each single catastrophic infrequent event; b) the set up of a multi-hazard approach, together with the development of a common methodology for risk assessment;
c) the identification of a pilot study enough general to join several disciplines in a transversal approach.
The investigation on natural catastrophes (except volcanic) has been carried out since the beginning of the Action and continued until its end (Figures 1-5).
1. INVESTIGATION ON NATURAL DISASTERS
2. INVESTIGATION ON VOLCANIC ACTIONS AND VESUVIUS PILOT STUDY
The study on the volcanic phenomena increased strongly during the WG4 activities (Figures 6-20), especially when the Vesuvius was selected as the WG4 pilot study.
Figure 1. C. Coelho. Waves/Storm Surges/ (Tsunamis), Coastal Erosion Problems, Modelling of Coastal Protection
Measures (Delft, 2006).
Figure 2. D. Lungu, C. Arion. Extreme wind and snow loads for structural design (Delft, 2006).
Figure 3. J.P. Muzeau, A. Bouchair, V. Sesov, C. Coelho. Identification & classification of exposure events; exceptional or
infrequent event scenarios (Prague, 2006).
Figure 4. E. Nigro. Flow slides effects on constructions; damage analysis and failure models (Trieste, 2008).
Figure 5. T. Rossetto. Tsunami physical modelling. A contribution to calculating tsunami risk (Trieste, 2008).
VESUVIUS 2000Project objectives
Flavio Dobran
GVES, Napoli, Italy
www.westnet.com/~dobran
Urban Habitat Constructions Under Catastrophic Events
Trieste, 17 January 2008
Earthquake scenarios for the Earthquake scenarios for the
determination of the seismic load on determination of the seismic load on
the structures surrounding Vesuvius.the structures surrounding Vesuvius.
Giuliano F. PanzaGiuliano F. Panza
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
�
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Trieste, 17-18 January 2008
COST C26 ACTIONCOST C26 ACTION
““URBAN HABITAT CONSTRUCTIONS UNDER URBAN HABITAT CONSTRUCTIONS UNDER
CATASTROPHIC EVENTSCATASTROPHIC EVENTS””
1717--18 JANUARY 200718 JANUARY 2007
TRIESTE, ITALYTRIESTE, ITALY
UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES ““FEDERICO IIFEDERICO II””
Department of Structural EngineeringDepartment of Structural Engineering
PROF.PROF. Federico M. MAZZOLANIFederico M. MAZZOLANI
Dr. Beatrice FAGGIANODr. Beatrice FAGGIANO
ENG. Daniela DE GREGORIOENG. Daniela DE GREGORIO
VESUVIUS CASEVESUVIUS CASE
Università degli Studi di Napoli “ Federico II”
Presentazione delle Attività del Centro Studi
P.LIN.I.V.S.(Per L’INgegneria Idrogeologica Vulcanica e Sismica)
Giulio Zuccaro
Napoli
19 Febbraio 2008
Giornata Inaugurale del
Centro Studi PLINIVSCentro di Competenza del
Dipartimento di Protezione
Civile Nazionale
COST ACTION C26 – Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events
Naples meeting – January 23, 2009
Torre del Grecosome buildings (as pilot units) have been selected in order to evaluate in detail the
volcanic actions on constructions:
- an area of Torre del Greco city
center, besides the sea, consisting of
about 100 units made of different
materials (masonry, reinforced
concrete, etc.); also the important
“Palazzo di Città” shall be studied;
- a strip of “sacrifice” buildings (about
20 units), laying on the volcano slope,
which can be heavily damaged or
destroyed by the eruption;
- a strategic facility, as the hospital of
Torre del Greco;
-a cultural heritage building, as the
“Villa delle Ginestre”.
- schools
POSITIONPOSITION
LEGEND:
San Giovanni a Teduccio (11)
Barra (10)
San Giorgio a Cremano (30)
Portici (31)
Ercolano (22)
Torre del Greco (18)
ACTIONS TORRE DEL GRECO
Gaetano Amodio. 2002.
VILLE VESUVIANE TRA OTTOCENTO E NOVECENTOVILLE VESUVIANE TRA OTTOCENTO E NOVECENTO
Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane
VILLASVILLAS
VILLA CAMPOLIETO (E)VILLA CAMPOLIETO (E)VILLA RUGGIERO (E)VILLA RUGGIERO (E)PARCO SUL MARE (E)PARCO SUL MARE (E)
VILLA DELE GINESTRE(TG)VILLA DELE GINESTRE(TG)
The locationThe location
THE STUDY CASE: AN EXISTING R.C. BUILDINGTHE STUDY CASE: AN EXISTING R.C. BUILDING
6km
Vulnerability of a Historical Masonry
Building in the Vesuvius Area
G. Florio, A. Formisano, R. Landolfo, F. M. Mazzolani
University of Naples “Federico II”
Action C26Urban Habitat Constructions Under Catastrophic Events
Working group and MC meetings, 11-12 April 2008, Vilnius
Collection of stratigraphies, definition of shear
wave velocities of the shallower soils and
computation of spectral amplifications
C. Nunziataa, G. De Niscoa, F. Vaccarib, G. F. Panzab,c
aDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Univ. Napoli Federico II, ItalybDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Univ. Trieste, Italy.
cThe Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, ESP-SAND Group, Trieste, Italy.
Working group and MC meetings, 11-12 April 2008, Vilnius
Definition of structural models and sources at Definition of structural models and sources at
Vesuvius, characterization of seismic activity both Vesuvius, characterization of seismic activity both
in terms of background seismicity and in terms of background seismicity and
intermediateintermediate--term prediction of moderate size. term prediction of moderate size.
C. Nunziataa, G. De Niscoa, A. Peresanb, G. F. Panzab,c
aDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Univ. Napoli Federico II, ItalybDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Univ. Trieste, Italy.
cThe Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, ESP-SAND Group, Trieste, Italy.
Scenario based seismic
hazard assessment:
the example of Napoli
C. Nunziataa
aDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Univ. Napoli Federico II, Italy.
Figure 6. B. Faggiano. Volcanic eruptions: the phenomenon and its consequences
(Timisoara, 2007).
Figure 7. F. Dobran. Urban habitat constructions around Vesuvius (Prague, 2006).
Figure 8. F. Dobran. Vesuvius 2000: project objectives (Trieste, 2008).
Figure 9. F. Dobran, M. Indirli. Plinian eruption scenario (Vilnius, 2008).
Figure 10. G.F. Panza. Earthquake scenarios for the determination of the seismic load on
the structures surrounding Vesuvius (Trieste, 2008).
Figure 11. F.Mazzolani, B. Faggiano, D. De Gregorio. Vesuvius case (Timisoara, 2007; Trieste,2008; Vilnius, 2008). Actions in the catastrophic
scenarios of a volcanic eruption. Analysis methodology for the evaluation of the eruption
effects on buildings (Malta 2008).
Figure 12. G. Zuccaro. The activity of the PLINIVS Centre in Naples (Trieste, 2008;
Naples, 2008; Naples, 2009).
Figure 13. M. Indirli. The Vesuvius pilot study (Prague, 2006); Naples, 2007; Trieste, 2008; Vilnius, 2008;
Malta 2008; Naples, 2009; Southampton, 2009; Aveiro, 2009).
Figure 14. F.M. Mazzolani, B. Faggiano, D. De Gregorio. Selection of the pilot buildings
(Naples, 2009; Southampton, 2009).
Figure 15. G. Zuccaro. Assessment of the vulnerability of structures in the
surrounding area of Vesuvius in the case of a possible eruption (Naples, 2009). Elaboration of the investigation data
achieved in Torre del Greco (Southampton, 2009).
Figure 16. A. Formisano. Vulnerability of existing r.c.
buildings in the Vesuvius area (Naples, 2009).
Figure 17. F.G. Florio, A. Formisano, R. Landolfo, F.M. Mazzolani. Vulnerability of a historical masonry building in the
Vesuvius area (Naples, 2009).
Figure 18. C. Nunziata, G. De Nisco, F. Vaccari, G.F. Panza. Collection of stratigraphies, definition of shear
wave velocities of the shallower soils and computation of spectral
amplifications (Vilnius, 2008).
Figure 19. C. Nunziata, G. De Nisco, A. Peresan, G.F. Panza. Definition of
structural models and sources at Vesuvius, characterization of seismic activity both in
terms of background seismicity and intermediate-term prediction of moderate
size (Vilnius, 2008).
Figure 20. C. Nunziata. Scenario based seismic hazard assessment: the
example of Napoli (Vilnius, 2008; Southampton, 2009).
3. MULTI-HAZARD, VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENTThe work took advantage from the activity experienced in other International, European and National projects and Actions
(examples: EXPLORIS 2006; MAR VASTO 2007; COST TU0601 2007; Figures 21-32).
Jean-Philippe Carlier, Aurélie Talon
and Jean-Pierre Muzeau
November, 27th 2009
Flood risk quantification in urban areas
Picture Météo France
Urban Habitat Constructions Under Catastrophic EventsWG4 – Risk Assessment & Catastrophic Events
Aveiro – 27-28 November 2009
Qualitative and quantitative risk analysis
Aurélie Talon – Jean-Philippe Carlier – Jean-Pierre MuzeauPolytech’Clermont-Ferrand – LaMI / Polytech’Lille
LaMI Laboratoire de Mécanique et IngénieriesEA 3867 FR TIMS / CNRS 2856
Seismic vulnerability and risk Seismic vulnerability and risk
assessment in urban habitats:assessment in urban habitats:
Methodology and caseMethodology and case--studiesstudies
A.J. Kappos, ProfessorA.J. Kappos, Professor
DepartmentDepartment of Civil Engineering, of Civil Engineering,
AristotleAristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversity of Thessaloniki
COST- C26 meeting, Southampton, 27-28/3/2009
IDENTIFICATION OF SEISMIC DAMAGES AND COLLAPSE
MECHANISMS IN BUILDINGS DUE TO 2009 L'AQUILA
EARTHQUAKE
Figure 21&22. M. Indirli. Natural multi-hazard and building
vulnerability in the historical urban habitat: the examples of San Giuliano di Puglia, Italy, and
Valparaiso, Chile (Delft, 2006; Trieste, 2008; Naples, 2008).
M. Indirli. Overview of risk assessment approach for natural
hazards (Prague, 2006).
Figure 23. F. Romanelli. Seismic & tsunami modelling for scenario based
hazard assessment (Southampton, 2009).
Figure 24. J.P. Carlier, A. Talon, J.P. Muzeau, Flood risk quantification in
urban areas (Aveiro, 2009).
Figure 25. M. Faber. Robust structures (Delft, 2006). Resistance to infrequent loads (Prague, 2006).
Outline of Risk Assessment methodology (Timisoara, 2007).
Framework for the management of large scale natural hazards (Trieste,
2008). M. Faber, H. Narasimhan, General methodology for risk assessment. Risk assessment for catastrophic
scenarios in urban areas (Southampton, 2009).
Figure 26. A. Talon, J.P. Carlier, J.P. Muzeau, Qualitative and quantitative
risk analysis (Aveiro, 2009).
Figure 27. G. Solari. Lessons from catastrophic events in the evolution of
bridge and wind engineering. Malta, 2008.
Figure 28. A.J. Kappos. Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment in urban habitats: methodology and case studies (Southampton, 2009).
Figure 29. D. Vamvasikos. Current research in Cyprus: uncertainties
in seismic performance assessment (Southampton, 2009).
Figure 30. R. P. Borg, The seismic risk of the buildings in Malta (Malta, 2008).
Figure 31. F. Romanelli. Lessons from the 2008 Sichuan earthquake
about modeling of seismic input (Malta, 2008).
Figure 32. M. Indirli, R.P. Borg, L.A. Kouris. Identification of seismic
damages and collapse mechanisms in buildings due to 2009 L’Aquila
earthquake (Aveiro, 2009).
The work involved several experts of different disciplines and created
an enlarged platform for a free and productive discussion.
CONCLUSIONS