version: june 2016 - oecdmeasuringurban.oecd.org/content/the oecd metropolitan...2 the metropolitan...
TRANSCRIPT
2
The Metropolitan eXplorer offers an interactive visualisation of the 281 OECD metropolitan areas identified in 30 OECD countries1, the functional urban area of Luxembourg2 and the 8 Colombian metropolitan areas3.
Comparable values and rankings of population, GDP, employment, quality of air and many other indicators can be displayed through different visual techniques developed by NComVA for the OECD.
Explore the visualisation
http://measuringurban.oecd.org
Give your feedback
1 The OECD-EU definition of functional urban areas (FUA) has not been applied to Iceland, Israel, New
Zealand and Turkey. 2 Luxembourg has been included in the Metropolitan eXplorer despite the fact that it has a population below
500 000 inhabitants. 3 In 2016, the OECD-EU methodology for Functional Urban Areas (FUA) has been applied to Colombia using
municipal administrative boundaries and population grid data based on the 2005 population census.
3
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4
I. Different techniques to visualise the data ........................................................................................... 6
II. Indicators and years available ............................................................................................................. 8
III. Data sources and estimation techniques to compile the indicators ............................................... 13
1. Socio-economic statistics .............................................................................................................. 13
2. Environmental statistics ................................................................................................................ 14
3. Innovation statistics ...................................................................................................................... 15
4. Urban form .................................................................................................................................... 16
5. Territorial organisation ................................................................................................................. 16
6. Data sources .................................................................................................................................. 16
IV. References ....................................................................................................................................... 19
4
Introduction
The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of urban areas which overcomes previous limitations linked to administrative definitions (OECD, 2012). According to this definition an urban area is a functional economic unit characterised by densely inhabited “city core” and “commuting zone” whose labour market is highly integrated with the core.
1) City cores are defined through gridded population data. The geographic building blocks to define functional urban areas are the municipalities (LAU2 in Eurostat terminology and the smaller administrative units for which national commuting data are available in non-European countries).
The population grid data for European countries comes from the Corine Land Cover dataset, produced by the Joint Research Centre for the European Environmental Agency (EEA). For all the non-European countries, gridded population data comes from the Landscan project.
A “city core” consists of a high-density cluster of contiguous grid cells of 1 km2 with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per km2, a lower threshold of 1,000 people for km2 is applied to Australia, Canada and US. Small clusters (hosting less than 50,000 people in Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Europe and the United States, 100,000 people in Japan, Korea and in Mexico) are dropped.
A municipality is defined as being part of a urban core if at least 50% of the population of the municipality lives within the urban cluster. If more than 15% of employed persons living in one city core work in another city core, these two city cores are combined into a single destination (to take into account policentricity).
2) Commuting zones are defined as all municipalities with at least 15% of their employed residents working in a certain city core. Municipalities surrounded by a single functional urban area are included and non-contiguous municipalities are dropped.
This methodology makes it possible to compare functional urban areas of similar size across countries. A classification of functional urban areas into four types according to population size is proposed:
• Small urban areas, with a population below 200 000 people;
• Medium-sized urban areas, with a population between 200 000 and 500 000;
• Metropolitan areas, with a population between 500 000 and 1.5 million;
• Large metropolitan areas, with a population of 1.5 million or more.
5
The Metropolitan eXplorer presents socio-economic data of the large two categories of functional urban areas: Metropolitan areas and Large metropolitan areas, in other words, metropolitan areas with a population of 500 000 or more.
This Guide describes the different indicators, sources and visual techniques available in the Metropolitan eXplorer web tool.
For further information on metropolitan areas, read the publication OECD Regions at a
Glance, available on June 16, 2016 at:
http://www.oecd.org/gov/regions-at-a-glance.htm
6
I. Different techniques to visualise the data
The Metropolitan eXplorer4 displays the indicators through three different linked
dynamic views: a map, a histogram and a scatterplot. Once the indicator has been selected,
it appears both on the map and on the histogram. The size of classes in a map can be
adjusted by clicking on the values of the classes in the legend. One or more cities can be
selected on the map (or on the histogram) by clicking on the city.
City cores and commuting zones are identified respectively on the map in dark/light
grey. City cores and commuting zones can be highlighted by clicking on the metropolitan
area border. Administrative boundaries of regions can be highlighted, appreciating the
difference between the administrative and economic boundaries of the metropolitan areas.
Select View and choose Show/Hide administrative boundaries and Show/Hide Metro
Boundaries
Size and colours can be customized through Settings. Colours can be associated
either to the intensity of the indicator chosen, or to countries (Select View, Color).
4 Disclaimer: maps are for illustrative purposes and are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty
over any territory covered by these maps.
7
Select the Metro Profiles to have a summary view of the performance of a single
metropolitan area compared to the national value as well as to the other metropolitan
areas.
The scatterplot allow the visualisation of three variables for each metropolitan area
at the same time. You can choose the variables to be plotted on the X-axis, on the Y-axis and
on the size of the bubbles.
8
II. Indicators and years available The following indicators are available in the Metropolitan eXplorer for all the metropolitan areas as well as for the national averages.
Group Indicator Description Year
Population
Population (persons)
Population by municipality for the years 2001 and
2011 comes from the Population Census. The
population by municipality from the Census 2011 is
then recomputed according to the metropolitan
boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan population
between the years 2001 and 2011 is estimated.
2014
Population share of
national value (%)
Share of the metropolitan population over the national
value. 2014
Population growth
(%)
Annual average population growth over the period
2000-12. 2000-14
Population density
(persons per km2)
Ratio between total population and total land area. 2014
Population of the
city core (persons)
Population by municipality for the years 2001 and
2011 comes from the Population Census. The
population by municipality from the Census 2011 is
then recomputed according to the metropolitan
boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan population
between the years 2001 and 2011 is estimated.
2014
Population of the
commuting zone
(persons)
Population by municipality for the years 2001 and
2011 comes from the Population Census. The
population by municipality from the Census 2011 is
then recomputed according to the metropolitan
boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan population
between the years 2001 and 2011 is estimated.
2014
Population
by age
Youth population
Population between 0-14 years old by municipality for
the years 2001 and 2011 comes from the Population
Census. The population by municipality from the
Census 2011 is then recomputed according to the
metropolitan boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan
population between the years 2001 and 2011 is
estimated.
2014
Working age
population
Population between 15-64 years old by municipality
for the years 2001 and 2011 comes from the
Population Census. The population by municipality
from the Census 2011 is then recomputed according to
the metropolitan boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan
population between the years 2001 and 2011 is
estimated.
2014
Old population
Population by above 64 years old by municipality for
the years 2001 and 2011 comes from the Population
Census. The population by municipality from the
Census 2011 is then recomputed according to the
metropolitan boundaries of 2001. The metropolitan
population between the years 2001 and 2011 is
estimated.
2014
Old-age-dependency
ratio
Ratio between the elderly population (65+ years) over
the working age population (15-64 years old) 2014
Youth-dependency
ratio
Ratio between the youth population (0-14 years old)
over the working age population (15-64 years old) 2014
9
Area
Total land area
(km2)
Total land area of the metropolitan area. 2014
Land share of
national value (%)
Share of the metropolitan land area over the national
value. 2014
Urbanised area
(km2)
The urbanised area is defined as the land area covered
by buildings or infrastructure for urban use. It
includes, for example, residential and non-residential
buildings, major roads, railways, and sport facilities.
2006
Urban area share
(%)
Share of the urbanised area over total land of a
metropolitan area. 2006
Urban area growth
(%)
Annual average growth of the urbanised area over the
period 2000-06.
2000-06 (except for Japan [1997-
2006], USA [2001-06])
Green area per
capita (m2)
Land in the metropolitan area covered by vegetation,
forest and parks in 2000 (source: MODIS MCD12Q1),
divided by the population of the metropolitan area.
2014
GDP
GDP (millions US$)
Estimates of GDP of metropolitan areas, expressed in
millions of US$, constant prices and constant PPPs,
OECD base year (2010). The estimates are derived
from the values of TL3 regions (except for Australia,
Canada, Chile and Mexico (TL2) and the United
States (Bureau of Economic Accounts)).
2013 (except for Austria,
Colombia, Germany, Estonia,
Finland, France, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Norway,
Poland, Spain, Sweden and
Switzerland [2012])
GDP growth (%) Annual average GDP growth over the period 2000-13.
2000-13 (except for Austria
[2000-12], Colombia [2000-12],
Germany [2000-12], Estonia
[2000-12], Finland [2000-12],
France [2000-12], Hungary
[2000-12], Ireland [2000-12],
Italy [2000-12], Japan [2001-12],
Mexico [2003-13], Norway
[2008-12], Poland [2000-12],
Spain [2000-12], Sweden [2000-
12], Switzerland [2008-12] and
United States [2001-13]).
GDP share of
national value (%) Share of metropolitan area GDP over national GDP
2013 (except for Austria,
Colombia, Germany, Estonia,
Finland, France, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Norway,
Poland, Spain, Sweden and
Switzerland [2012]).
GDP per capita
(US$)
GDP per capita expressed in US$, constant prices and
constant PPPs, OECD base year (2010).
2013 (except for Austria,
Colombia, Germany, Estonia,
Finland, France, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Norway,
Poland, Spain, Sweden and
Switzerland [2012]).
GDP per capita
growth (%)
Annual average GDP per capita growth over the
period 2000-13.
2000-13 (except for Austria
[2000-12], Colombia [2000-12],
Germany [2000-12], Estonia
[2000-12], Finland [2000-12],
France [2000-12], Hungary
[2000-12], Ireland [2000-12],
Italy [2000-12], Japan [2001-12],
Mexico [2003-13], Norway
[2008-12], Poland [2000-12],
Spain [2000-12], Sweden [2000-
12], Switzerland [2008-12] and
United States [2001-13]).
10
GDP
Labour productivity
(US$)
GDP per employee expressed in US$, constant prices
and constant PPPs, OECD base year (2010).
2013 (except for Austria,
Colombia, Germany, Estonia,
Finland, France, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Norway,
Poland, Spain, Sweden and
Switzerland [2012] and Slovenia
[2001]).
Labour productivity
growth (%)
Annual average GDP per employee growth over the
period 2000-13.
2000-13 (except for Austria
[2000-12], Colombia [2000-12],
Germany [2000-12], Estonia
[2000-12], Finland [2000-12],
France [2000-12], Hungary
[2000-12], Ireland [2000-12],
Italy [2000-12], Japan [2001-12],
Mexico [2003-13], Norway
[2008-12], Poland [2000-12],
Spain [2000-12], Sweden [2000-
12], Switzerland [2008-12] and
United States [2001-13]).
Environment
CO2 emissions per
capita (level)
Estimates of CO2 emissions (expressed in tons) in
metropolitan areas divided by population. The values
are disaggregated from the corresponding national
values.
2008
CO2 emissions share
from energy industry
(%)
Share of CO2 emissions from the energy industry over
the total metropolitan CO2 emissions. 2008
CO2 emissions share
from transport (%)
Share of CO2 emissions from transport (road and non-
road ground transport) over total metropolitan CO2
emissions.
2008
CO2 emissions per
capita from energy
industry (level)
Ratio between estimated CO2 energy emissions and
total population in a metropolitan area. 2008
CO2 emissions per
capita from
transport (level)
Ratio between estimated CO2 transport emissions and
total population in a metropolitan area. 2008
Air pollution (µg/m³) Estimated population exposure to air pollution PM2.5
expressed in µg/m³, three year average 2012-14. 2013
Labour
market
Employment (level)
Estimated total employment in a metropolitan area.
The estimates are derived from the TL3 regional
values except for Poland, Mexico, Chile and Colombia
(TL2), Canada (NOG). Metropolitan figures for the
United States and Australia are provided by the U.S.
Bureau of Labour Statistics and Australian Bureau of
Statistics respectively.
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Employment share
of national value
(%)
Share of metropolitan unemployment over the national
value.
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Employment growth
(%)
Annual average employment growth over the period
2000-14.
2000-14 (except for Australia,
Austria and Czech Republic
[2000-13], Denmark [2007-14],
Germany and Colombia [2001-
14], Switzerland [2010-13],
Slovenia [2001-11]).
Unemployment
(level) Estimated total unemployment in a metropolitan area.
The estimates are derived from the TL3 regional
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
11
Labour
market
values except for Poland, Mexico, Chile and Colombia
(TL2), Canada (NOG). Metropolitan figures for the
United States and Australia are provided by the U.S.
Bureau of Labour Statistics and Australian Bureau of
Statistics respectively.
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Unemployment
share of national
value (%)
Share of metropolitan unemployment over the national
value.
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Unemployment
growth (%)
Annual average unemployment growth over the period
2000-10.
2000-14 (except for Australia,
Austria and Czech Republic
[2000-13], Denmark [2007-14],
Germany and Colombia [2001-
14], Switzerland [2010-13],
Slovenia [2001-11]).
Labour force (level)
Estimated total labour force in a metropolitan area.
The estimates are derived from the TL3 regional
values except for Poland, Mexico, Chile (TL2),
Canada (NOG). Metropolitan figures for the United
States and Australia are provided by the U.S. Bureau
of Labour Statistics and Australian Bureau of Statistics
respectively.
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Labour force share
of national value
(%)
Share of the metropolitan labour force over the
national value.
2014 (except for Austria,
Australia, Czech Republic and
Switzerland [2013] and Slovenia
[2011]).
Labour force growth
(%)
Annual average labour force growth over the period
2000-10.
2000-14 (except for Australia,
Austria and Czech Republic
[2000-13], Denmark [2007-14],
Germany and Colombia [2001-
14], Switzerland [2010-13],
Slovenia [2001-11]).
Patents
PCT patent
applications (count)
PCT patent applications (fractional count; by inventor
city and priority year). 2013
PCT patent
applications of the
metropolitan area as
% of national value
(%)
PCT patent applications of the metropolitan area as %
of national value. 2013
PCT patent
applications annual
average growth (%)
Annual average PCT applications growth over the
period 2000-08. 2000-13
Patent intensity
(level)
PCT patent applications per 10,000 inhabitants
(fractional count; by inventor city and priority year). 2013
Urban form
Polycentricity
(count)
Number of non contiguous core areas by metro area. 2014
Concentration of
population (%)
Share of population living in the core areas over the total metropolitan population. 2014
Sprawl index (%)
The sprawl index (SI) measures the growth in built-up area adjusted for the growth in city population. When the city population changes, the index measures the increase in the built-up area relative to a benchmark where the built-up area would have increased in line with population growth. The SI index is equal to zero when both population and built-up area are stable over time. It is bigger (lower) than zero when the
2000-06 (except for Japan [1997-
2006], USA [2001-06])
12
growth of built-up area is greater (smaller) than the growth of population, i.e. the city density has decreased (increased).
Territorial
organisation
Local governments
(count)
Number of local governments in a metropolitan area. Only the lowest tier of government is considered and only general- purposes governments.
2014
Local governments
in the core (count)
Number of local governments in the core areas of the metropolitan area. 2014
Territorial
fragmentation (level)
Number of local governments per 100,000 inhabitants of the metropolitan area. 2014
Average population
size of municipalities
(persons)
Ratio between population and number of local governments in a metropolitan area.
2014
13
III. Data sources and estimation techniques to compile the indicators
1. Socio-economic statistics
Social, economic and labour statistics at sub-national level (such as GDP and Labour)
which are comparable across countries are generally available for administrative regions
(TL2 and TL3 regions of the OECD Regional database). While a set of indicators may in the
future become available for the OECD functional urban areas, at present we suggest to
derive estimates of the main economic indicators by adjusting existing regional data to the
non-administrative boundaries.
GIS techniques are increasingly adopted in the literature, especially in the field of
environmental indicators and other issues that are particularly attached to the geography of
the territory, rather than their functional or political organisation (Nordhaus et al., 2006;
Milego and Ramos, 2006; Doll et al., 2000). On the basis of the methods that have been
used in the literature to adjust indicators at small-scale geography, the OECD has decided to
make use of Geographic Information System (GIS) tools to disaggregate socio-economic
data. The methodology is similar to that applied by Milego and Ramos (2006) to downscale
socio-economic data from European administrative regions to a 1 km² regular grid level
within the context of an Espon research (European Observation Network for Territorial
Development).
The proposed methodology uses the socio-economic values (GDP, employment and unemployment) in TL3 regions as data inputs and the distribution of population based on census data. The methodology to adjust socio-economic data to metropolitan areas has evolved from the use of raster population data (i.e. Landscan) to municipal population census data as the input data source. This change has allowed the use of more up-to-date data (census data c.a. 2011) as well as the use of harmonised municipal boundaries over time. Indeed, long time-series have been generated using consistent boundaries of municipalities between the two census data points by using GIS techniques.
The suggested methodology is composed of three main steps:
Intersect the municipal boundaries with the TL3 boundaries by the use of GIS techniques;
Attribute each municipality a GDP value by weighting for the population in each municipality; and
Calculate the sum of municipalities’ GDP values belonging to each metro area.
14
An improved method would be to use employment data rather than population data in step 2. For example, the United Kingdom Office for National Statistics provides income estimates at ward level down-scaling the regional values through various variables including household size, employment status, proportion of the ward population claiming social benefits, and proportion of tax payers in each of the tax bands, etc. A similar method is used by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis to estimate the GDP for U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland used CLC-Data-Classes urban continuous fabric, urban discontinuous fabric and industrial or commercial units for all neighbouring countries by calibrating with other data to estimate data for jobs in grid cells. However these types of data input are not available in most OECD countries therefore a simpler solution was adopted.
A similar technique is applied to estimate employment and unemployment in metropolitan areas with working age population (15-65 years old) used as data input in step 2.
It has to be noted that the estimates of GDP, employment and unemployment in the metropolitan areas do not adhere to international standards; the comparability among countries relies on the use of the same methodology applied to areas defined with the same criteria.
2. Environmental statistics
The development of statistics on the state and changes of local environmental assets is
a challenging task. While countries have started to invest more resources in the monitoring
of key environmental variables, such as carbon emissions, data are rarely collected and
analysed at the sub-national level. This is problematic given that national averages hide
great geographic differences in contributions to natural resources depletions and exposure
to environmental risks. Based on the need of providing environmental statistics at local
level, the OCDE has developed some methodologies to derive environmental indicators at
different territorial levels (Piacentini and Rosina, 2012).
Land cover indicators are based on remotely sensed source data at different levels of
resolution, and obtained through overlay analysis (superimposing the source data layer with
the layer of the territorial boundaries of the Functional urban areas). In this case, the
functional urban value is the sum (land cover) of the values observed in the source data
within the area of interest.
CO2 emissions are obtained through data that are available at the national level, but
have been downscaled to regularly spaced “grids” (i.e. 1 km2) through a model that uses
information of observable elements that are correlated with the production of emissions,
15
such as population density, roads and factories that capture how the phenomenon of
interest is distributed across space.
CO2 emissions by sector derive the CO2 emission produced by the energy industry and
by transportation; the latter include ground transportation (road and non-road) and exclude
aviation and shipping.
The estimated average exposure to air pollution (PM2.5) is based on GIS-based methodology at metropolitan level using the satellite-based PM2.5 estimates of van Donkelaar, Martin, Brauer and Boys (2014) at 0.1o x 0.1o geographic grid resolution (Brezzi and Sanchez-Serra, 2014 and 2016). The method used to produce the estimates is the following:
The satellite-based of air pollution at 1 km2 are multiplied by the population living in that area (using a 1km2 resolution population grid);
The exposure to air pollution in a region (or a metropolitan area) is given by the sum of the population weighted values of PM2.5 in the 1 km2 grid cells falling within the boundaries of the region (metropolitan area); and
Finally, the average exposure to PM2.5 concentration in a region is given by dividing this aggregated value by the total population in the region.
This indicator is derived from global satellite observations of PM concentration. It has the advantage of being computable globally without requiring country capacity investments in data collection.
3. Innovation statistics
Patents are worldwide recognised as a useful measure of the generation of ideas and
they have actually contributed to the historical study of invention. Every PCT5 patent count
in the OECD Patent Database includes all inventor names, each inventor’s address and
detailed information about the patent’s technology, among others. Using the geographical
location of the inventive process, PCT patent counts are assigned to metropolitan areas
according to the inventor’s address. Every inventor’s hometown is matched to a zip-code
area, which is then assigned to a Metropolitan Area. Therefore, the metropolitan
distribution of patent applications is identified on the basis of the inventor’s zip-code of
residence. If one application has more than one inventor, the application is divided equally
5 . The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is an international patent law treaty, concluded in 1970. It
provides a unified procedure for filing patent applications to protect inventions in each of its contracting states.
A patent application filed under the PCT is called an international application, or PCT application.
16
among all of them and subsequently among their zip-codes of residence, thus avoiding
double counting. 6
4. Urban form
The following variables were compiled to measure urban form:
The polycentricity is given by the number of city cores included in a metropolitan area.
The concentration of population in the city core is the share of metropolitan population that
lives in the urban cores of the metropolitan area. It provides a measure of the relative
importance of urban cores versus hinterlands.
The sprawl index (SI) measures the growth in built-up area adjusted for the growth in city
population. When the city population changes, the index measures the increase in the built-
up area relative to a benchmark where the built-up area would have increased in line with
population growth. The SI index is equal to zero when both population and built-up area are
stable over time. It is bigger (lower) than zero when the growth of built-up area is greater
(smaller) than the growth of population, i.e. the city density has decreased (increased).
The sprawl index is defined as
𝑆𝐼𝑖 =
[𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖,𝑡+𝑛 − ((𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖,𝑡𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑖,𝑡
) ∗ 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑖,𝑡+𝑛)]
𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑖,𝑡∗ 100
where,
i refers to a particular metropolitan area.
t refers to the initial year
t+n refers to the final year
urb refers to the built-up area in square kilometres.
pop refers to the total population.
5. Territorial organisation
Several studies have analysed the structure of the metropolitan area governance in relation
to the efficiency and equity of service delivery, government efficiency, the distribution of
wealth within a metropolitan area, among others. As a first simplified measure of
administrative organisation we consider the number of local governments, the average
6 . Fractional Count has been used to count for total patents by metro area. The Fraction Count method
counts each patent as a fraction, depending on how territories are weighted. As an example, patent P, which is
produced by two inventors of different zip-code areas, this patent will count for 0.5 in each of these zip-code
areas. As a result each patent will count as one single patent for any given region avoiding double counting.
17
population size of municipalities and the territorial fragmentation defined as the number of
local governments in a metropolitan area per 100,000 inhabitants.
To identify the number of local governments included in a metropolitan area two simplifying
assumptions have been considered:
Only general-purpose local governments are included, while the specific function
governments are excluded (for example school district, health agencies, etc.).
Only one local level of government has been included, notably the lowest tier, as a
measure of the horizontal fragmentation. Of course the administrative structure of a
country may include more than one level of government with relevant
responsibilities over the same territory covered by the metropolitan area.
6. Data sources
Indicator Data sources
Population The population by municipality for the years 2000 and 2014 comes from the Population Census. The
population by municipality from the Census 2012 is then recomputed according to the metropolitan boundaries
of 2001. The metropolitan population between the years 2000 and 2014 is estimated
GDP Estimated based on GDP data at TL3 level from OECD Regional Database
http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=REG_DEMO_TL3
Labour Estimated based on labour data at TL3 level from OECD Regional Database
http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=REG_DEMO_TL2
Total, Green and
Urbanised area
US: NLCD 2001 (Version 2) and NLCD 2006 databases;
Japan: Japan National Land Information 1997 and 2006;
EU (except Northern Ireland): CORINE Land Cover 2000 and CORINE Land Cover Changes 2000-2006;
Canada, Korea and Mexico: MODIS Land Cover data 2008, urban class refers circa to year 2001-2002. Data
are derived from medium spatial resolution (500m) satellite imagery and should be taken as rough estimates.
CO2 emissions European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL).
Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4.1.
http://edgar.jrc.ec.europe.eu, 2010.
Air pollution Van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, M. Brauer, R. Kahn, R. Levy, C. Verduzco, and P. J. Villeneuve, Global
Estimates of Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-based Aerosol Optical Depth,
Environ. Health Perspec., doi:10.1289/ehp.0901623, 118(6), 2010.
http://fizz.phys.dal.ca/~atmos/datasets/World-PM25-20010101-20061231-RH50.TIF.zip
Patents OECD Patent Database
www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/data/oecd-patent-statistics_patent-data-en
18
Country Name of local governments in the territorial organisation Source
Austria Gemeinden (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Belgium Gemeenten/Communes (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Canada Census Subdivisions (towns, villages, etc.) (CSD) Statistics Canada (Statcan)
Switzerland Municipalities (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Chile
Comunas Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE)
Chile
Czech Republic Obce (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Germany Gemeinden (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Denmark Sogne (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Estonia Vald, linn (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Spain Municipios (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Finland Kunnat / Kommuner (LAU2) EUROSTAT
France Communes (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Greece Demotiko diamerisma/Koinotiko diamerisma (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Hungary Települések (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Ireland Elector4al Districts (LAU1) EUROSTAT
Italy Comuni (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Japan
Shi (city), Machi or Cho (town) and Mura or Son (village) National Land Numerical Information
Service of Japan
Korea
Si (city), Gun (county), Gu (district) Korean Statistical Information Service
(KOSIS)
Luxembourg Communes (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Mexico
Municipios Instituto Nacional de Estadística y
Geografía (INEGI)
Netherlands Gemeenten (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Norway Municipalities (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Poland Gminy (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Portugal Freguesias (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Sweden Kommuner (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Slovenia Občine (LAU2) EUROSTAT
Slovak Republic Obce (LAU2) EUROSTAT
United Kingdom
County Councils. For those areas where the County Councils
were abolished the Local Authority (either a Metropolitan
District Council or a Unitary District Council) is used. For
London, the Borough Councils are used.
UK Office of National Statistics
United States
Municipalities or townships. In the geographic areas where
municipalities or townships do not represent a general
purpose government, the County governments were
considered.
U.S. Census Bureau “2002 Census of
Governments”
19
IV. References
Brezzi, M. and D. Sanchez-Serra (2014), “Breathing the Same Air? Measuring Air Pollution in Cities and Regions”, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, , No. 2014/11, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrb7rkxf21-en.
Brezzi, M. and D. Sanchez-Serra (2016), “Breathing the same air? Measuring pollution in regions and cities – updated results”. United Nations Economic and Social Council. Conference of European Statisticians. Economic Commission for Europe. Sixty-fourth plenary session. Paris, 27-29 April 2016 https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/2016/mtg/CES_34-Breathing_the_same_air__OECD_.pdf
Doll, C.N.H., J.P. Muller and C.D. Elvidge (2000), “Night-time imagery as a tool for global mapping of social-economic parameters and greenhouse gas emissions”, Ambio, 29(3): 157-162.
Milego, R. and M.J. Ramos (2006), Espo 2013 Database, Espon Publishing. Nordhaus, W., Q. Azam, D. Corderi, K. Hood, M.N. Victor, M. Mohammed, A. Miltner, J. Weiss (2006),
“The G-Econ Database on Gridded Output: methods and data”, available online at gecon.yale.edu, yale University, 75.
OECD (2012) Redefining Urban: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas, OECD Publishing.
Piacentini, M. and K. Rosina (2012), “Measuring the Environmental Performance of Metropolitan Areas with Geographic Information Sources”, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2012/05, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9b9ltv87jf-en.