verifier toolbox and verification for assessment indicators
DESCRIPTION
VERIFIER TOOLBOX and VERIFICATION for ASSESSMENT INDICATORS in Sustainable Plantation Forest Management Certification SystemTRANSCRIPT
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
VVEERRIIFFIIEERR TTOOOOLLBBOOXX aanndd VVEERRIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN ffoorrAASSSSEESSSSMMEENNTT IINNDDIICCAATTOORRSS
iinnSSuussttaaiinnaabbllee PPllaannttaattiioonn FFoorreesstt MMaannaaggeemmeenntt CCeerrttiiffiiccaattiioonn
SSyysstteemm
11.. IInnttrroodduuccttiioonnLEI-03 Technical Document is a further explanation of the Sustainable Plantation ForestManagement (PHTL) System criteria and indicators stated in LEI 5000-2 Standards. FieldAssessors may use this document as reference in verifying field data.
22.. SSccooppeeThis document explains the definition, verifiers, data sources and verification methods for eachSustainable Plantation Forest Management (PHTL) System certification assessment indicators onproduction, ecology and social aspects.
33.. RReeffeerreenncceea) LEI 5000 Standard, Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL) System Frameb) LEI 5000-2 Standard, Sustainable Plant Forest Management (PHTL) System
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
22.. VVeerriiffiieerr aanndd IInnddiiccaattoorr VVeerriiffiiccaattiioonn MMeetthhoodd iinn tthhee FFiieelldd AAsssseessssmmeenntt ooff SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee PPllaannttaattiioonn FFoorreessttMMaannaaggeemmeenntt ((PPHHTTLL)) CCeerrttiiffiiccaattiioonn
44..11 PPrroodduuccttiioonn AAssppeecctt
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P1.1
Land assurance as timber
estate area.
The suitability of a management unit area withland utilization procedure (Forest-Use
Procedure/TGH, Provincial Area-UsePlan/RTRWP, Present Land-Use/PLU) from thebeginning until the minimum length of usage time
will provide assurance to the area used. To givefurther judicial assurance on land-use and reduce
future land-use conflicts, every change in forestfunction caused by changes in land-useprocedure must be reappointed as soon as
possible.
1. The status of land function ina management unit area, in
accordance with land-useprocedure and its alteration(size and frequency).
2. Completion of boundary
positioning.
3. Conditions of the boundary
poles in the field (position,physical type and condition).
4. Boundary positioning/participative mapping
1. Decree ofmanagement unit
appointment.
2. Governor/Regent
recommendation.
3. Provincial Forest Use
Plan (TGH), LandUse Plan (RTRWP)
and PLU maps.
4. Decree on forest
function change ofstatus
5. Management plandocument.
6. Management unitworking area map.
7. Administrativedocuments related to
an appointment.
8. Statement letter of
1. Investigate landconflicts with other
sectors and gatherevidence (includingfunction alteration
and other rightimposition).
2. Purposefulinvestigation of
boundary poles inthe field.
1. Super-imposed and unit management area mapanalysis with land-use procedure map.
2. Tracking down administrative processes from thelatest document related to forest function status
alteration and appointment process/procedure.
3. Tracking down administrative processes from the
latest document related to boundary positioningprocedure.
4. Purposive sampling test to the followingboundaries:
a. Borders from community housing andpremises.
b. Alliance borders, especially with othermanagement units.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
boundary positioning.
9. Registration map ofboundary positioning.
10. Documents on
participativeboundary positioningand other
agreements.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P1.2
Forest Fire Management
System.
Forest fire is an alarming factor, which have a
great deal of influence on resources as a whole.Considering its effects beyond the boundaries
and its unexpectedness, it requires exceptionalpreparation of management in its prevention togain forest conservation. It can be represented
within organizations, individuals, infrastructuresand utilities that are equivalent to the risk of fire
incident.
1. Intensity/frequency and
scale of forest fires.
2. Organization, utilities and
equipment, and forest fireStandard Operating
Procedure (SOP).
3. Type and intensity/frequency
of forest conservation patrol.
4. Local community and related
institution involvement.
5. Early warning system.
1. Management plan
document.
2. Forest conservation
patrol report.
3. Annual and/or otherperiodic reports.
4. Hotspot map.
5. Fire hazard index
map.
6. Forest fire guide or
SOP.
1. Result of forest fire
tools and utilitiescheck.
2. Result from theinterview with
forest conservationofficer.
3. Investigate landconflicts with other
sectors and gatherevidence (includingfunction alteration
and other rightimposition).
3. Purposefulinvestigation of
1. Identification/investigation of tools and utility type
and quantity.
2. Frequency and scale identification of fire incidence.
3. Interview with forest conservation patrol officer.
4. Analyses of hotspot map and fire hazard index.
5. Identification of routine and procedure of fire usagein land clearing.
6. Alertness and sufficiency in preventive andsuppressive action.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
boundary poles in
the field.
P1.3
Main plant selection,
silviculture system andtechniques.
Main plant selection, action (system andtechnique) of silviculture in management plan
level, and its implementation based onconsiderations that corresponds with corporategoal, land support capabilities, ecosystem and
surrounding social condition, will provide anaccomplishment of management unit in managing
its resources.
1. Main plant selection.
2. Silviculture system and
techniques.
3. Implementation of each stageof silviculture activities oractions.
4. Forest ecosystem data.
5. Stumpage structure andcomposition.
6. Community social condition.
1. Management Plandocuments and
modifications.
2. Mid term planning
document or RKT untilthe present day or
year.
3. Annual report and/or
other periodicals.
1. Field observation.
2. Sample test in the
field through visualobservation and
interview.
1. Compare task implementation of silvicultureactivities with the task planned.
2. Analyze selected silviculture activities.
P1.4
Non-timber forestproduct utilizationimprovement.
Forests are not only useful for its wood; thus,
there are efforts in optimizing other form of use,as service or product. The planted forest being
developed will benefit the community. Theexistence and potential of non-timber forestproducts will provide opportunities and
guarantees to the planted forest itself.
1. Space usage pattern
2. Type usage pattern
3. Silviculture system
4. Amount and type of non-
timber forest product.
1. Management plan
document
2. Reports on non-
timber forest productusage.
Field monitoring within
and around themanagement unit
location.
Interview with officers and community.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P1.5
Stumpage growth and
Permanent Sample Plots (PUP) is used as field
laboratory or as growth increment monitoringmedia to create volume table, silviculture
1. Sampling procedure and
intensity in repeated
1. Permanent
Sampling Plot
Results from interviews
with officers andimplementation
1. Identification of the bases of Permanent Sampling
Plot location selection.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
monitoring implementation
and results.
treatment testing, and other research and
development activities for sustainable productionforest. The level of significance in long-term forestproduction estimation is determined by sampling
procedure and intensity in the repeated inventorylisting. Repeated inventory is needed to fix
predetermined planning, which can be performedevery three to ten years depending on thematurity cycle, total managed area, and
disruption and failure occurred.
inventory.
2. Methodology, procedure,and intensity of growth data
collection.
3. Permanent Sampling Plot
guide or StandardOperating Procedure.
4. Permanent Sampling Plotdocumentation and
monitoring.
5. Basic data and mapping.
location map.
2. Annual Work Plandocument (RKT).
3. Inventory report.
4. Forest inventoryguide.
5. Growth incrementmonitoring and other
monitoring (beyondPermanentSampling Plot).
6. Growth
measurement guide.
monitoring. 2. Identification of Permanent Sampling Plot test
results applied in forest management practice.
3. Implementation monitoring and assessment.
4. Applying inventory results in planning and
implementation.
5. Sustainability testing caused by change in
inventory result including forest stumpagemonitoring outside Permanent Sampling Plot.
P1.6
Annual productionaccording to forestproductivity, planting
capability, and landsupport.
The annual production allotment is measured upwith the maximum land capability to produce
biomass per size or time unit, and its replantingcapability. Forest product (timber) will sustain if
the maximum output equals to the determinedproduction allotment. Then, the time-based timberforest product harvesting routine will simplify the
sustainability arrangement for the next cycle.
1. Annual wood production onannual production allotment.
2. Production statistics.
3. Permanent Sampling Plotresult implementation in
forest management practice(Allowable Annual Cut/AACand annual average growth
increment), nutrient or bonitacycling review (soil fertilityclassification).
4. Harvesting schedulesuitability (reasoning).
5. Planting schedule suitability
(reasoning)
1. Management plan,mid-term planning,
and Annual WorkPlan.
2. Cruising Report (LHC)and Production
Report (LHP).
3. Growth increment,
nutrient cycling, andmonitoring of growthincrement, nutrient
cycle, growth areaindex (bonita).
4. Production statisticsand filing.
Sampling test onproduction potentials on
the cutting block.
1. Interview with officers/employees responsible forproduction statistics and filing.
2. Assess AAC compatibility to this day (workingyear) on the compatibility of forest reproduction
derived from the annual average growthincrement.
3. Percentage (estimation) of cutting schedulesuitability on the cutting plan.
4. Percentage (estimation) of planting schedule onthe plan (predetermined).
5. Compare completion of implementation to itsimplementation guide.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
6. Yield arrangement method. 5. Basic data and map.
6. Annual report and
other periodicals.
7. Felling map.
8. Environmentalanalyses document.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P1.7
Quality of Forest Area
Clearing.
Forest Area Clearing must be planned byconsidering the fulfillment of all activity aspect(mobilization) in forest development especially
forest product production. The optimum intensityor compactness and total road length (main,
branch or skid trail), location, and road and bridgeconstruction quality is carried out to ensure thecontinuity of operational activity in the
development and guidance of plantation forestand forest production activities, and itsmaintenance aspects.
1. Ratio between main, branchroad and breadth of themanagement unit.
2. Suitability between physical
quality (road, basecamp,seed bedding, etc.) andforest potential.
3. The existence of thestructural building (type,
location, number, andconstruction endurance).
4. Water management quality.
5. Building maintenance
quality.
6. Forest Area Clearing
1. Long Term PlantationForest ManagementPlan (RKPHT),
Annual Work Plan(RKT), or mid-term
planning reports.
2. Building construction
specification forForest Area Clearing(SOP).
3. Forest Area Clearing
technical guide.
4. Forest Area Clearing
planning andrealization.
5. Delineation and
Sampling test onstructural quality (roads,basecamp, etc.)
1. Density analysis of main and branch road on thesize of the working area.
2. Main and branch road surface monitoring.
3. Wood transportation intensity analysis per time
unit.
4. Density analysis main and branch road on the size
of the working area.
5. Wood transportation intensity analysis per timeunit.
6. Identification/investigation on erosion controlstructures.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
Standard or guidance. working area
structural design.
P1.8
Publication of rightstowards the forest area.
Publication of rights of the area, especially to the
community within and around the managementunit to provide and achieve an understanding toincrease community awareness to active
participate in forest resource sustainability.
Counseling activities. 1. Environment
managementdocument.
2. Report on publicationof rights towards area(counseling).
Record of interviews
with officers andcommunity.
interviews with officers and community.
P1.9
Organization unit in forest
management.
The existence of organization units on planning,production, forest support, research and
development, conservation and environment,social community, finance and administration,marketing/distribution, and independent Internal
Supervisory Unit (SPI) and supported withsufficient number of qualified employees can act
as INDICATOR of sincerity of the plantation forestcompany in production sustainability.
1. Organization structure andjob description.
2. Number and qualification ofworkers.
1. Annual reports andother periodicals.
2. Corporateorganizational
structure.
3. Monitoring
documentations.
Record of interviewswith management and
field check.
1. Interviews with management.
2. Identification/investigation of the existence of
organizational units.
3. Analysis on line of instruction, coordinationbetween organization units and its authorization,tasks and responsibility followed by an investigation
of implementation/practice in the field.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P2.1
Forest disruption range.
Any form of forest disruption will have significanteffect on yield sustainability, therefore, the size of
disruption must be acknowledged to be able todetermine the appropriate actions. Moreover,protection activities must be performed to reduce
1. Form/type of disruption andits intensity/frequency and
scale.
2. Form and
intensity/frequency of forest
1. Program andrealization of
counseling.
2. Forest protection
patrol report.
1. Interview resultswith officers and
the community.
2. Results on forest
disruption
1. Interview with officers and local community.
2. Interview with forest patrol officers.
3. Analyses on change of vegetation coverage using
time series data/satellite image.
4. Tracing the administrative process from the latest
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
the existing disruption level. protection patrol.
3. The availability of forestprotection patrol instrument
and equipment and its SOP.
1. Overcutting.
3. Annual report or
other periodicals.
inspection. documents related with the change process of
forest status to its authorization.
5. Identification/investigation of the type/variety and
number or volume of forest product damage.
P2.2
Seed availability.
The availability of seedling with genetically,physically and physiologically sound quality,
sufficient supply, and at appropriate timing is abasic asset in achieving production sustainability
in forest plantation. Seedling with high geneticquality is likely to increase biomass productivity,which is the objective of forest production in each
rotation. Sufficient supply of seedling and itsappropriate timing will ensure the success ofplanting and maintenance activities, and
achievement of forest production target, also inreducing plant mortality rate.
1. Seedling cultivation unit andmanagement.
2. The available seedlingmatches the demand.
3. Seedling cultivation
Standard OperatingProcedure/Guide.
4. Communication network on
seedling cultivation withresearch and development
(R & D),and productionseed.
1. Management plandocument.
2. Technical guide onseedling cultivation.
3. Periodicals on
seedling production.
4. R & D reports.
Interview with officersand field monitoring.
1. Interviews with officers/employees of seedlingcultivation management.
2. Assess seedling production capacity and seedprocurement sources.
3. Assess seedling production standards in seed field
or other sources.
P2.3
Planting capability and
result quality.
Planting capability is a basic asset towards forest
production sustainability for the next cycle.Planting statistics are a record of planting
completed years before that consist of plantingquantification and its achievements, and otherrecords of matters related to planting procedure,
barriers of not able to accomplish and whatcauses it.
The records can be used as monitoring andevaluation material leading to planting procedure
1. Planting statistics.
2. Planting yield quality.
3. Planting realization towardsland availability.
1. Annual Work Plan
until today.
2. Annual report andother periodicals.
3. Inventory reportdocuments on
planting achievementfive year and above.
4. Planting technical
guide.
Sample test result on
planting performance onseveral critical age (1
and/or until 4 years).
1. Interview with officers
2. Identification/investigation of system and filing
instrument (manual, computerized or manual andcomputerized).
3. Compare planting achievement and capability level.
4. Assess planting result quality by observing
diameter and height growth uniformity.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
improvement for better assurance of future
production sustainability.5. Planting statistics
under 5 years and itsfiling instruments.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P2.4
Maintenance capability andresult quality.
Basically, maintenance provides growth space for
every plant. Appropriate procedure, order andmaintenance intensity for every growth level willprovide bigger growth opportunity. As with
harvesting, order in time-based maintenanceactivities will simplify the management of
sustainability for the next cycle and it can supportthe realization of production sustainability.
1. The reality of carry over in
maintenance activities in theprevious Annual Work Plans.
2. Level of achievement inmaintenance.
3. Target of every level ofactivity/duty per time unit,
including location andforecast of procurement andequipment.
4. The condition of stumpageas result of maintenance.
1. Mid-term plan
documents andAnnual Work Planrunning today.
2. Annual reports and
periodicals.
3. Maintenance reports.
4. Technical guide onstumpage
maintenance.
5. Document of planting
activities.
Field monitoring result
on maintenance-relatedplants according to itstype/form of
maintenance.
1. Assess the available guide/technical
implementation of every level of duty.
2. Compare intensity/frequency of residual stand
maintenance (clearing, sparsing) to this day(working year) to the determined basic standard.
3. Monitoring and visual recording of stumpagestructure at several maintained plot/block, which
have different age (growth uniformity, type of stemdeformation, stem and branch shape, shape of treetop, etc.)
P2.5
Environmental-friendlyforest harvest system
implementation.
Every forest product harvesting stage that effect
the environment (especially vital negative effects)must be plotted clearly in terms of location, typeand weight of effects occurred, so that control
implementation such as reduced impact loggingcan be determined in minimizing the effects on
the location of harvest.
The procurement of erosion control structures at
skid road, transportation road, log-yard, and atother structural areas is one of the efforts in forest
1. Form and percentage of land
damage.
2. The existence of buildings
(type, location and quantity).
3. Erosion and sedimentation.
4. Vital effect indicator map.
5. Type, location, and timeschedule of the
implementation of UPL and
1. Environmental impact
Analyses document.
2. Long-term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan and AnnualWork Plan
documents.
3. Annual reports and
periodicals.
4. Cutting
1. Cutting
implementationmonitoring result.
2. Damagemonitoring causedby cutting
activities.
3. Identification of
cutting equipmentused.
1. Monitoring of cutting implementation in the field
including measuring of the damage level occurred.
2. Identification/investigation of the type of equipment
used in the cutting process.
3. Calculating the ratio of the number of equipment
according to type to the potency of wood issued pertime unit.
4. Identification/investigation of the erosion controlconstruction.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
utilization impact control towards physical
components of the environment, which soonafter, decreases negative impacts on productionsustainability.
UKL.
6. Monitoring, organizing andstandard operating
procedure on cutting,skidding, etc.
implementation
guide.
5. Environment
ManagementDocument.
6. Forest Clearing Areadesign and
realization.
7. Vital effect indicator
map.
5. Environmental monitoring analysis.
6. Erosion, land, and sedimentation condition.
7. Identification of activities and vital effects occurredand its control.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P2.6
Management InformationSystem.
Managerial policy in terms of seriousness of the
plantation forest company toward productionsustainability or otherwise, will be identified fromthe management information system, whether is
was being used in the decision making processornot. Therefore, it requires a monitoring and
1. Management Information
System.
2. Management facility of the
organizing committee.
3. Management decision
making procedure.
1. Annual reports and
periodicals.
2. Corporate
organizationstructure.
3. Job description
Interview with the
management andidentification/investigation of MIS
applications.
1. Interview with the management.
2. Identification/investigation of MIS applications,hardware and software, including its smart system.
3. Analyses of line of instruction, coordinationbetween organization units and their authorities,
duties, and responsibilities.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
management system proportionate to the size of
the management unit area and clarity of decisionmaking procedure that matches decisions inevery organization unit (planning, production and
control, and other work support unit).
4. Organizational structure.
5. Job description.
6. Role of division.
manual. 4. Investigation on implementation/practice in the
field.
5. Identification/investigation of the existence of SPI
and other special division.
P2.7
The continuance andorderliness of funding for
every activity aspects.
Forest management sustainability requires
sufficient funding for forest reformation andconservation, conservation area and naturalbiodiversity management (including
protected/endemic/endangered species), forestproduction and control, market/customer service,
research and development, and facility and workequipment procurement, and also humanresource development.
Funding allocation, realization, and
continuity for main and supportingactivities (budget proportion onactual/ideal budget).
1. Annual forest
utilization financialreport.
2. Management unitactivity plan and
budget.
3. Public accountant
report.
4. Other relevant and
accountable reports.
Interview with finance
division and fieldinvestigation.
1. Fund realization and allocation can be identified
from financial reports, results from physical qualityassessment derived from the technical standardoperation, and fair value from fixed asset.
2. Analysis will be directed to assess indicators based
on the size of fund allocation and its realization.
3. In its implementation, interview and field
investigation can be combined with other relevantindicators.
P3.1
Production areaorganization.
Area partitioning according to its purposes is
based on land physical characteristics that arenot managed properly, such as mountain slopesand its sensitivity towards erosion, and external
factors such as rain intensity. It is then followedwith an effective area setting into a sustainableunit and/or part of a forest into blocks that must
show the existence of time dimension during acycle. Block and plot in the field must be arranged
according to rational and consistent timescheduling to minimize technical and financialstructure alteration practices. Therefore, forest
development practices, maintenance and
1. Effective area positioning for
land capability- and socialcondition-based production.
2. Protected and conservationarea positioning.
3. Time scheduling of activitieson every plot.
4. All effective area forproduction are divided
clearly into forest class/type,forest part, block and plotmarked by the present
1. Topography and land
map.
2. Climate map.
3. Design manual onarea setting or
landscaping.
4. Work area map.
5. Management plan
document.
6. Forest classification
distribution.
1. Result on area
setting in the field.
2. Cutting and
planting plot/block(realization).
1. Land support classification valuation based on the
slope map x land sensitivity towards erosion x rainintensity.
2. Purposive sample test on effective area positioningfor production based on the delineation map withthe following objectives:
a. Blocks that have been planted/cut.
b. Blocks that have not been planted/cut.
3. Purposive sample test on the condition of the
borders.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
production can be accurately implemented. demarcation point or other
borders.
5. Smallest sustainable unit.
6. Normal forest classification.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P3.2
Efficiency on harvestingand utilization of planted
forest products.
The high level of harvesting productivity is
represented by the comparison between the sizeof production and potential of the harvestedforest, which can be attained if harvesting is
performed in an efficient way.
This is shown by the exploitation factor unit,
maximum utilization of forest products (woodbiomass), and appropriate harvesting system or
technique, so that these important factors act asreference for plantation forest product harvestingtechnique.
1. Exploitation factor.
2. Type and form of harvestedand utilized forest product
biomass.
3. Result from inventory listing
prior to cutting/felling.
4. Production results.
5. Harvesting system and
technique in plantationforest.
1. Management plan
documents.
2. Long Term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan (RKPHT),Annual Work Plan
(RKT), or mid-termplanning reports.
3. Annual reports andother periodicals.
4. Utilization andharvesting decision
guide/SOP.
5. Cruising report (LHC)
and production report(LHP).
Interview with officers
and field monitoring.
1. Interview with officers or employees based on the
utilized exploitation factor, and forest productbiomass harvesting and utilization.
2. Exploitation factor valuation.
3. Potential and production comparison assessment.
P3.3
Internal forest product
administration.
Forest product business administration from the
forest to last log pond in the management unitcan provide guarantee of forest product
harvesting implementation control, in terms ofquantity and origin. The lettering method used
1. Internal timber administration
system, technical guide orstandard operating
procedure.
2. Production statistics.
1. Production statistics
and filinginstruments.
2. Time-based woodproduction realization
Interview with officers
and field monitoring.
1. Interview with officers/employees responsible for
production statistics and its filing.
2. Identification/investigation of filing system andequipments (manual, computerized or manual andcomputerized).
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
can at least guarantee an orderly administration
process and can avoid forest product distributionoutflow.
3. Internal forest administration
filing system.
4. Timber flow in the field/forest
and its marking technique.
and forecasting
report.
3. Log felling, skidding,
transportation report.
4. Cruising report
(LHC).
5. Logpond/logyard
report.
3. Field check on wood flow from logpond to backlog.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P3.4
Compatibility of the
effective production areawith the expected business
Business profitability that can reach the minimumattractive rate of return (MARR) is the mainprerequisite for a management unit. Every costs
must be covered by revenue, especially those
1. Business profitability per timeunit.
2. Corporate soundness(profitability, solvability,
1. Management Plandocument.
2. Comparative financialreport, annually or
--- 1. Compare forecast and realization of assetprocurement until today (the last 3 years).
2. Compare forecast and realization of annual profit
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
profitability/corporate
soundness.
that comes from utilized forest products. Without
being able to reach MARR, the effects of highcost and/or low revenue will bring in potentialexcess felling or digression from production
sustainability regulations. Nevertheless, corporatesoundness will depend on its daily condition.
liquidity). every three year
audited by publicaccountant.
3. Forest utilizationfinancial reporting
guide.
4. Periodical financial
documents or reports.
until today (the last 3 years).
3. Compare forecast and realization of annualbusiness profitability until today (the last 3 years).
4. Valuing annual profitability and compare it with its
average capital interest.
5. Valuing annual solvability.
6. Field check on investment or reinvestmentprojects to check its similarity with reports from the
public accountant.
P3.5
Plantation forest researchutilization and
development.
Every management activity aspect, especially
treatment on silviculture to increase forestsustainable productivity, improvement of productquality and performance must utilize research and
development resulted from the R&D division orother R&D institutions.
1. Programs analyzed and
developed.
2. Research results
implementation.
3. SOP set based on R&D
results.
1. R&D observation
data.
2. R&D result report.
3. Other related reports.
Field observation on
R&D facilities andresults.
1. Purposive observation on field, laboratory, etc.
2. Value the comparison of the program and itsresults.
P3.6
Establishment of businesspartnership with the local
community.
Business partnership establishment with the local
community confirms that the management unit iswelcomed in the region. The development ofpublic forest and community forest cultivation till
alter the attention and dependency of the localcommunity for the plantation forest land; theyeven can be partners in managing the forest.
Moreover, forest product utilization managementmust be capable in accommodating the interest of
the local community who is dependent to theforest.
1. Business formation and
partnership relation pattern.
2. Public forest and community
forest assistance perpopulation unit.
3. The development of publicforest and community forestassistance implementation
until this day.
4. Monitoring, organizing, and
SOP.
1. Forest village
communityassistance documentplan.
2. Forest villagecommunity
assistance reportuntil this day.
3. Partnershipagreement.
Interview with officers
and partners.
1. Interview with officers, community, and business
partners.
2. Appraise the proportion of public forest and
community forest per population unit.
3. Calculate the percentage of the realization for
public forest and community forest implementationuntil today.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
P3.7
Forest stumpage asset
enhancement.
The increasing forest stumpage/stand asset andconsidered as capital that must not depreciate is
an effort on business improvement andreinvestment that performs long-term costing.
1. Capitalization, realization,and fund allocation for forest
development prepared forcutting and put on themarket.
2. Forest value estimation from
time to time.
1. Annual forestutilization financial
report.
2. Management unit
activity and budgetingplan.
3. Periodical inventoryreport.
Interview with financialdivision and field
investigation.
1. Realization and fund allocation for plantation forestdevelopment prepared for sale can be identified
from the financial report; the result of the valuationof labor physical quality derived from the technicaloperational standard; and fair value of fixed asset.
2. Valuation on the increase of capital in the form of
forest.
44..11.. EEccoollooggyy//EEnnvviirroonnmmeennttaall AAssppeeccttss
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.1
The percentage or actualbreadth ratio of an
appointed and well running
Conservation region that has been appointed
and/or acknowledged by related stakeholders andmet the environmental biophysical considerationswill guarantee the maintenance of land quality
Percentage of the actual breadth of
steep slope area, river boundary ,coastal boundary, forested peatarea, beach/mangrove area,
1. Long-term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan
1. Aerial photograph
analysis.
2. Field check on the
actual size of the
1. Interview with the management unit and community
within the forest area.
2. Analyses of documents and literature study.
3. Field check to verify the existence of the protected
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
conservation area, to its
ideal breadth.
and the sustainability of the water management
within the plantation forest management.
water spring boundary, protected
forest and conservation forestbuffer-zone, and areas with>2000m above sea level that has
been approved and acknowledgedby related parties to its ideal
breadth.
(RKPHT)/Annual
Work Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/Regional
Spatial/Land UsePlan.
3. Appointment andBorder Management
Report.
4. Interpretation map of
aerial photograph/landsat image.
5. Plantation forestfeasibility study.
6. EnvironmentalImpact Assessment
document.
7. Other related
literature/information.
8. Related report
analysis.
protected region. area and well running.
E1.2
The planning of effectiveproduction area structuring
based on theappropriateness andcapability of land and its
water functioncontinuance.
The effective production area is a land within the
plantation forest area that can be effectivelyplanted with selected plants based on ecologicalfeasibility and corresponds with corporate goals.
To make sure that the productivity of the selectedplant is guaranteed in a long period, the effective
production area must be managed based on theland compatibility and capability and the
1. Ratio of the size of
production area on the totalsize of the area.
2. Ratio of the size of theconservation area on thetotal size of the area.
1. Design map of the
plantation areaapproved byDirectorate General
of ForestryProduction
Management.
2. Topography map,
1. Aerial photograph
analysis.
2. Field check on
planting groundpartitioning basedon land
compatibility andcapability, and the
Sample test on the borders of the effective production
area organized into plant areas based on the Topographymap, land coverage map, and land slope.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
sustainability of the water management function. land coverage map,
and land slope.
3. Land support map
(slope x type x class).
4. Area structure design
guide.
sustainability of
watermanagementfunction.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.3
The percentage or ratio of
the actual boundaries of aconservation area andeffective production area
(appropriateness andcapability of land and itswater function
continuance) to its idealboundaries.
Border management or border sign is one of the
indicators to show that an arrangement has beendone. Arrangements based on the ideal ratio of
the conservation and production forest on theactual border sign will guarantee the sustainabilityof land and water function.
1. Percentage or ratio of the
actual border managementof the conservation forest on
the ideal bordermanagement of theconservation forest.
2. Percentage or ratio of theactual border arrangement
of the production area (landcompatibility and capability)on the ideal border
arrangement.
1. Provincial/Regional
Land Use Plans.
2. Plantation forest
feasibility study.
3. Border Management
report.
4. Environmental impact
report.
5. Other related reportsand literature.
Direct field check. Monitoring and interviewing directly in the field and
compare and analyze using collected data or reports, sothat the conservation forest can run well.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E1.4
The percentage or ratio ofthe boundaries of a well
running conservation areato its ideal boundaries.
The stated conservation area will not be noticed if
there are no clear guideposts on the borders. Theposts will clearly state the border between theconservation area (height, slope steepness, and
peat density) with the production/felling area andother areas. These guideposts will not indicateanything unless maintained properly.
1. The existence of the
guideposts and informationboards that are wellfunctioning and maintained,
and also the existence of
2. The functioning of security
patrol.
3. Standard operating
procedure of forest securityprotection.
1. Regional security and
protectionimplementationdocument.
2. SOP document.
Direct field check. 1. Interview with field personnel and other related
group around the management unit.
2. Monitoring the condition of guideposts and
inspection lane using sampling test with samplinglevel of intensity.
3. Forest security (patrol) monitoring by fieldpersonnel.
E1.5
The planning and
implementation ofsilviculture system that can
control erosion in the cutup or production area.
Erosion caused by silviculture practices such asduring felling period or land clearing can be
controlled by repairing land coverings as soon aspossible through planting and mulching, andminimizing the usage of heavy equipment that
might increase soil density, which burdens landquality (soil physics and chemistry) and watermanagement.
1. The SOP of felling design.
2. The SOP of land clearing
design.
3. Prove or records of planting
activities in open areas tocontrol erosion (for example:
effort not to clear areas with
a slope level of > 45° or
covering/planting open
felling remains areas of >
45°).
1. Felling andproduction reports.
2. Other related writtenreports.
3. Reports on the sizeof open area caused
by land clearing andfelling.
4. Types of the utilizedland covering.
5. Records of efforts onerosion control other
than planting (forexample: terasering).
Direct field monitoring. 1. Read and translate obtained reports.
2. Directly monitors signs of felling practices in the
field that has minimum effects.
3. Interviews with field personnel/employees.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.6
Change in soil fertility
(physical and chemical),including the production
waste contamination.
Production activities that involves landpreparation to plantation, maintenance and
harvesting, significantly influence soil fertilitylevel, in terms of soil chemical and physicalelements. Soil fertility can be disrupted by the
abundance of chemistry/organic substancescaused by over-fertilization or contamination inthe production process such as mycorhizza fungi
contamination that affects land fertility. Change infertility level will tend to decrease if the
management unit does not maintain land fertility,stated in the nutrient budget, soil compaction, andthe top soil and type of plant.
1. Site matching or provenancetrial.
2. Implementation ofappropriate cultivation
technology.
3. The utilization of ameliorant
element such as inorganic(urea, KCL), organic, andbiologic fertilizer
(mycorhizza).
4. The existence of dried
leaves (forest litter) andcover-crops within the
plantation/production area.
5. Periodical reports (soil and
plant tests).
6. Top-soil existence,
abundance and thickness.
7. Soil compaction existence
and abundance within theplantation/production area.
1. Five-year Work Plandocument.
2. Nursery (seeding),planting, and plant
maintenance reports.
3. Fertilizing report.
4. Soil survey report(lab analyses).
5. Other related
research results.
6. Data/records on the
utilization of heavyequipments ormechanical
machines.
1. Direct fieldchecking and
monitoring.
2. Direct field/lab soil
test and itsinterpretation.
1. Direct interview with field personnel.
2. Compare implementation reports with the
realization.
3. Monitors traces of amelioration.
4. Monitors the firmness of top soil and dried leaves
(forest litter ), and soil compaction.
5. Collect soil sample, analyze in the laboratory and
periodically interpret the result.
E1.7
The percentage of change
of land erosion on theproduction area.
The loss of top soil more than the tolerable soil
loss level shows that the plantation forestmanagement disregards soil conservationaspects. The effect of plantation forest toward soil
1. The emergence of a darkcolored top soil at the
planting area in theplantation forest.
1. Document on theanalysis of
environmentalimpact.
Field measurementresults.
The erosion measurement that can be performed ismonitoring the thickness of horizon A, sedimentation, and
water quality parameter, using laboratory analyses, ifnecessary.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
other than accelerated erosion is the decrease in
soil physical character, such as compaction,caused by incorrect land clearing method. Then itis the increase of surface run-off, cause by soil
compaction that can cause change in river flowdebit.
2. Form/types of erosion. 2. Results of
environmentmanagement and
monitoring from theenvironment division.
3. SPAS evaluationresult.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.8
The percentage of change
or disappearance ofvegetation structure and
species in the conservationarea.
The vegetation structure in the conservation areais closely related to the interseption of rainfall
(stem-flow and throughfall) and into the soil.
This relates to the erosion control and water
management around water bodies. Therefore, ifthe vegetation structure around the water body
cannot support rainfall interseption, erosion levelwill increase in the area and disrupt the functionsof the water bodies. Besides as wildlife’s habitat
and corridor, and source of genes, secure placefor plant community and types, the conservationforest must also be the center of attention in
activities in natural environment resourcesprotection and maintenance by the plantation
forest management unit.
1. Change in vegetationstructure.
2. Decrease in the quantity ofplant type.
1. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
2. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL).
3. Vegetation coveragemap.
4. Aerial photo/landsatimage interpretation
map.
5. Other related reports.
Field monitoring on plantstructure and species in
water bodies.
1. Analyses of related documents and maps.
2. Interview with the management unit and related
parties.
3. Field monitoring on plant structure and quantityusing purposive sampling in the protected forestarea.
E1.9
The percentage of
quantitative change (riverdebit), continuity change
(constant water supply)and quality change(chemical, solid, and
suspension) in waterbodies to the existingstandard measurement
caused by managementunit’s activity.
Water condition of the water body especially inrivers can be described as good if it flows at alltime, without any significant difference in peak
debit (during wet season) and in minimum debit(during dry season), and the water quality is in a
good condition according to its natural state.
Reduction in water quality particularly drastic
concentration until below the authorized waterquality standard shows a forest management thatdoes not pay attention to the environment. The
reduction is caused by accelerated erosion andhigh surface run-off.
1. Maximum debit (wet season)and minimum debit (dryseason).
2. Content of solids
suspensioned and dissolvedin water (river).
1. SPAS data.
2. Environmental
management andmonitoring report.
3. Other related writteninformation.
1. Direct fieldmeasurement.
2. Interview withlocal community.
1. Read and interpret SPAS data and other reports.
2. Interview with local community in the downstream
area of the plantation forest on water managementcondition in the dry and wet season.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.10
Land utilization
pattern/systemimplementation in plantingactivities and plant forest
stumpage maintenance,which may influence landquality and water course
function.
Land quality condition and water management
function sustainability is influenced by landutilization system/pattern using suitable plant type
and considers the condition of the localenvironment, biophysical and social culturalelements of the community.
1. The existence of land
utilization systemimplemented by the
community that proves toinfluence the condition ofland quality in the production
area.
2. Plantation forest stands
improvement proven toaffect land quality by thecommunity in the production
area.
1. Diagnostic study
report.
2. Annual Work Plan or
mid-term planningdocument.
EnvironmentalImpact Analysesdocument.
3. Forest supportactivity report.
Interview with related
stakeholders andsampling test on land
utilization systemimplementation.
1. Interview with the management unit, local
community, and other stakeholders.
2. Field monitoring on the implementation of land
utilization system.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E1.11
Protection of land fromerosion and land and water
contamination (the usageof pesticide, herbicide, andenvironmental-friendly
fertilizer).
Intensity of impact control on soil shows the
persistence of the plantation forest managementin avoiding impact of the plantation forestutilization on environmental physical components.
Impact control on soil can be shown in soilconservation activities.
1. The existence of soil and
water conservation activities(guludan, mulch), particularlycover-crop in high-erosion-
potential regions (beyonderosion levels.
2. Land rehabilitation activitiesin open areas and not
utilized.
3. Monitoring activities in land
and water qualitymanagement.
4. Soil test.
5. Types of pesticides used
and its active form ofchemical composition.
1. Results from the
environment impactanalyses.
2. Result ofenvironmentmonitoring from the
environmentaldivision.
3. SPAS evaluationresult (if any).
Results from the field
measurement towardsthe verifiers.
1. Monitoring of erosion indications in open areas and
measure sedimentation level in waters during wetseason.
2. Monitoring/measuring can only be performed ofefforts in managing impacts of erosion andsedimentation are implemented.
3. Buildings and constructions monitoring, and soil
conservation treatment, which must be donealthough performed at the simplest form.
4. Soil sample collecting from the field, which is done
to acknowledge the content ofpesticides/herbicides in the soil.
INDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER DATA & INFORMATION METHOD OF
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
SECONDARY PRIMARY VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.12
Activities in maintenanceand rehabilitation of foresttype structure and
composition (vegetation) ofconservation area.
The sustainability of the function of conservationregion within a plantation forest management unit
can be maintained if the vegetation structure inthe region is well taken care of. Therefore, the
water management function will also run well.Further, in vegetation structure rehabilitation andmaintenance, screening of plant types needs
attention to ensure long-term land and watermanagement function.
1. Type structure andcomposition existing in the
conservation area.
2. Documents related to efforts
of rehabilitation andmaintenance of vegetation
structure.
1. Forest training report.
2. Vegetation coveragemap.
3. Latest aerialphoto/landsat image
map.
4. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
5. Report on theimplementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) and
EnvironmentalMonitoring Plan(RPL).
6. Documents onfeasibility study and
Engineering Design.
Interview with themanagement unit and
field monitoring.
1. Interview with the management unit.
2. Map analyses.
3. Field monitoring using purposive sampling with
random start method with specified intensity inproportion to the field condition.
E1.13
Waste handling system topreserve land quality and
watercourse functionsustainability.
Water bodies is a river mouth for waste (organic
and inorganic) produced by all activities in theplantation forest management unit. Most wasteare non-biodegradable (plastic, tin can, etc.) and
requires special treatment to avoid contaminationto the environment. The location of the waste
1. The waste form produced by
activities in the plantationforest management unit.
2. Waste handling.
3. Standard operating
procedure of waste handling
1. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
2. Report on theimplementation ofEnvironmental
Direct field monitoring. 1. Observation in the location of waste production and
disposal.
2. Water sample collection in water bodies.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
treatment facility determines the possibilities/
consequences towards the sustainability of landquality and water function. If the location andtreatment are not accurately determined, the
sustainability of water function in the water bodiesmay possibly be disrupted.
including location accuracy. Management Plan
(RKL) andEnvironmentalMonitoring Plan
(RPL).
E1.14
Usage of chemical
elements that maycontaminate water.
The utilization of chemical elements in themanagement unit can potentially contaminatewater bodies. Therefore, it must be carefully
managed.
1. The utilization of chemicalelements in unit activity.
2. The existence of chemicalcontent found in water
bodies.
1. EnvironmentalImpact Analysesdocument.
2. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmentalManagement Plan
(RKL) andEnvironmentalMonitoring Plan
(RPL).
Direct field monitoring. 1. Observation in the location of waste production anddisposal.
2. Water sample collection in water bodies.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E1.15 In increasing community welfare, a vast 1. The availability of annual 1. Report on diagnostic 1. Interview with the 1. Interview with the unit management, local
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
Active community
involvement in theenvironmental-friendly land
utilization pattern system.
opportunity is made available in the management
unit area. They are opportunities to use soil andland as extensive as possible as long as it doesnot disrupt the main plants and can increase its
quality.
plants (varieties for
tumpang sari/heteroculture)that can be utilized by thecommunity in the plantation
forest area.
2. The level of knowledge of
the community regarding thevarious land utilization
system.
results.
2. Forest support report.
3. Reports oncommunity support
surrounding theplantation forest.
4. Environmental
AssessmentAnalyses document.
unit management
and localcommunity.
2. Field monitoring.
community, and related parties.
2. Field monitoring on tumpang sari/heteroculturesystem and its achievements.
E2.1
The percentage of the
actual breadth of theconservation area (gene
resources, exotic and/orendangered flora/faunahabitat, wildlife corridor,
buffer zone, and appointedand well-managed forest
resources and utilized bythe community) to the idealbreadth of the conservation
area.
Protected areas based on the sustainability ofgene resources, unique and/or endangered
flora/fauna habitation, wildlife corridor, bufferzone, and well-managed forest resources and itsrecognition by stakeholders and the fulfillment in
meeting field biophysical considerations willguarantee the preservation of natural diversity.
The percentage of the actualbreadth of the conservation area
with its gene resources, unique/endangered flora/fauna habitat,wildlife corridor, buffer zone, and
life plants that can be utilized bythe community and have therecognition of related parties, to its
ideal breadth.
1. Long-term PlantationForest Management
Plan(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/RegionalSpatial/Land Use
Plans.
3. Report on Border
Recognition andManagement.
4. Aerial photo/landsatimage interpretation
map.
5. Plantation forest
feasibility study.
6. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
1. Aerial photoanalysis.
2. Results of directfield investigation
on the statedprotected region.
1. Interview with the unit management and communitysurrounding the forest.
2. Document analysis and literature study.
3. Field investigation to prove the existence of the
protected area and is well-managed.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
7. Other related
literature andinformation.
8. Related reportanalysis.
E2.2
The area structuring of
management unit based onthe importance of
flora/fauna conservation,plant forest stumpageprotection, and forest
resources that is veryuseful for the local
community.
The arrangement of the management unitworking area that considers the interest of
flora/fauna conservation, plantation forest standsand resources that is useful to the localcommunity will guarantee the preservation of the
natural diversity besides maintaining the stabilityof the ecosystem of plantation forest stands in thelong run.
1. The function-based areadesign.
2. The proportion of themanagement unit area
design performed by the unitto its ideal standard.
3. The implementation of thearea design presented in a
good and accurate map(area design report) orinformation system.
1. Work map.
2. Aerial photo/landsat
image interpretationresult.
3. Feasibility study andEngineering Design
documents.
4. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
5. Long-term PlantationForest Management
Plan(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
6. Other relatedliterature and
information.
1. Reports on relateddocument
analyses.
2. Interview with
related parties.
1. Analyses on related documents.
2. Map analyses, such as land covering, soil,
topography, and other related maps.
3. Interviews with related parties.
4. Direct field monitoring of areas stated by the unit,
especially conservation areas.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E2.3
The percentage of the
actual breadth ofconservation area (generesources, exotic and/or
endangered flora/faunahabitat, wildlife corridor,buffer zone, and life plant
area utilized by thecommunity) that is well
structured to the idealbreadth of the conservationarea.
The conservation area (gene resources,
unique/endemic and/or endangered flora/faunahabitation, wildlife corridor, buffer zone) that are
well structured and clearly mapped, whichexistence can be easily monitored and evaluatedin relation to the process of the system within the
unit and the surrounding area to guarantee asustainable natural diversity.
The percentage of the actual
breadth of the conservation area ofgene resources, habitat of unique/
endangered flora/fauna, wildlifecorridor, buffer zone, and lifeplants that can be utilized by the
community and that are wellstructured and managed, to itsideal breadth.
1. Long-term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan
(RKPHT)/AnnualWork Plan (RKT).
2. Provincial/RegionalSpatial/Land UsePlans.
3. Report on Border
Recognition andManagement.
4. Aerial photo/landsat
image interpretationmap.
5. Plantation forestfeasibility study.
6. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
7. Other related
literature andinformation.
8. Related reportanalysis.
1. Aerial photo
analysis.
2. Results of direct
field investigationon the stated
protected region.
1. Interview with the unit management and community
surrounding the forest.
2. Document analysis and literature study.
3. Field investigation to prove the existence of the
protected area and is well-managed.
E2.4
The assurance/
maintenance ofconservation area security
Border maintenance means not only maintainingguideposts and inspection route but also the
control shift of conservation area function to otherform, and reducing the size of the area that has
1. Prove of maintenance ofborder guideposts and
inspection route.
2. Change in the function of
1. Management unitadministration report,
particularly reports onforest security and
1. Documentanalyses aimed to
identify conditionand existence of
1. Interview with the unit management and communitysurrounding the forest.
2. Monitor the condition of the guideposts andinspection route using sampling test with specific
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
(gene resources, exotic
and/or endangeredflora/fauna habitat, wildlifecorridor, buffer zone, and
forest resources utilized bythe community).
no clear reasonable basis. Further, the meaning
of maintenance should include activities inevaluation and rehabilitation of conservation areacondition, to keep it well-functioning in the long
run.
conservation area to other
function.
3. Change in size of the
conservation area.
4. Evaluation and management
of the conservation.
5. Standard operation
procedure of forest securityprotection.
support.
2. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
3. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL).
the conservation
area.
2. Field monitoring
using sample teston the quality of
guideposts andinspection route.
sampling intensity level according to the length of
the observed border.
3. Monitor evaluation and rehabilitation activities in
the conservation area by the management unit.
4. Monitor unit activities in relation to community
participation in protecting and sustaining theconservation area.
E2.5
Wildlife diversity in theproduction area.
The main plant management in the plantation
forest area influence the diversity of wildlife in theregion. Based on the early condition of the wildlifehabitat, the plantation forest management can
decrease and/or increase their diversity.
Change in wildlife diversity. 1. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument
2. Documents onEnvironmental
Management/Monitoring Report.
Direct field monitoring. Field monitoring on the diversity of wildlife species using
standard method (mammals, birds and reptiles).
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
E2.6 The development of the natural resource 1. Form of resource utilization 1. Report on natural Direct field monitoring. Interview with the unit management and other related
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
Forest resources
information system(location, potential,
cultivation technique,harvesting technique, etc.).
information network system by the management
unit and other stakeholders is an implementationof the natural diversity conservation strategy andwelfare improvement of the local community. With
this system, the local community can utilize thenatural resources appropriately in a long period.
Moreover, the local community can participate inmaintaining and protecting its natural resources.
by the local community.
2. Relationship betweencompany owners and the
community.
3. Document/data concerning
information on forestpotential resources.
4. Monitoring the naturaldiversity.
resource potential.
2. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
3. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL).
4. Report on the resultsof the diagnostic
study.
parties.
E2.7
Pest, disease, and parasitecontrol activities using
environmental-friendlytechnology (using naturalpredator), so that the
natural ecosystem in themanagement unit areawon’t be disrupted.
Control over pest/disease and parasite is anecessary action in maintaining forest stands. In
its activity, the actions are conducted by avoidingor restricting the usage of chemical-based pest,
parasite control, which is considered to havesignificant effects on natural diversity.
1. Monitoring potential pest,disease or parasite.
2. Effort of implementing an
integrated pest managementsystem.
3. Utilization of chemical-based
pest, parasite control.
4. Utilization of biologicalpotentials to controlpest/disease/parasites.
Annual report on annualplantation maintenance.
1. Interview with fieldofficers.
2. Field monitoring
on pest/disease/parasites control.
1. Interview with plant maintenance supervisor.
2. Monitoring pest/disease/ parasites controltechniques.
3. Impact intensity measurement caused by thecontrol actions using chemicals.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
E2.8
The existence of forestresources that can be
utilized by the localcommunity.
To create a condition where forest resources can
be utilized sustainably by the community, onemust actively involved in forest resourcemanagement within the plantation forest
management unit.
1. Categories of forest
resources that can beutilized by the community.
2. Form of forest resourcemanagement system.
1. Report on community
support surroundingthe forest.
2. EnvironmentalImpact Analysesdocument.
3. Report on the
implementation ofEnvironmentalManagement Plan
(RKL) andEnvironmentalMonitoring Plan
(RPL).
4. Report on the results
of the diagnosticstudy.
1. Interview with the
unit managementand localcommunity.
2. Field monitoring.
1. Interview with the unit management and other
related parties.
2. Monitoring relating to the form of activity of the
community in utilizing forest resources.
44..22.. SSoocciiaall EEccoonnoommyy aanndd CCuullttuurraall AAssppeeccttss
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
S1.1
The certainty of the forestutilization area status.
Forest deployment in a certain region must
comply with the land tenure system, which someare represented in various pattern of land use.Therefore, the status of the utilization area must
be clear in its ownership and utilization. Theconcession area and the local community mustbe free of all claim of possession and of forced
clearance by each party.
1. Identification of the area
within the tribal jurisdiction orland tenure.
2. Description of the areainhabited by the localcommunity.
3. Description on the
management unit’s businessarea.
4. Identification of dispute
areas.
1. Community area
map.
2. Work map.
3. Dispute map
4. Related document.
1. Informant t.
2. Observation.
3. Discussion group
member.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Observation.
4. Group discussion.
The certainty of access to
the forest utilization by thecommunity.
The management unit provides certainty and
assurance to the local community to utilize nontimber resources in the concession area such as
water, animals and other non timber forestproducts. This utilization must be permitted aslong as it doe not alter land use.
1. Identification of location and
type of forest product utilizedby the community.
2. Official statement and provedelivered by the
management unit in relationto the free access, that thereare no prohibition
whatsoever for thecommunity to be able to
utilize non timber forestresources.
3. The management unit
facilitates the localcommunity in utilizing non
timber forest resources.
1. Long Term Plantation
Forest ManagementPlan (RKPHT)
document.
2. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
3. Diagnostic studydocument.
4. Other relateddocuments.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
3. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
4. Observation.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
4. An agreed procedure
approved by the unit and thelocal community in utilizing
non timber forest products.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
S1.3
The assurance ofcommunications and
transportations.
The development of the business area of amanagement unit must consider communication
and traditional transportation lines that existsbefore the presence of the unit.
1. Identification of the existingcommunication and
transportation system,traditionally known by the
community.
2. Description of the traditional
communication andtransportation system afterthe presence of the unit.
1. Community areamap.
2. Work map.
3. Related documents.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion groupmember.
3. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
4. Observation.
S1.4
Employment opportunity
for the community.
The management unit should take into accountmatters of employment related to the recruitment
process for the local community. The processshould consider the available local employmentmarket. Information on vacancies in the unit must
1. Description on therecruitment process.
2. Composition of workerssuited with the needs and
potential.
1. Labor data.
2. Annual Work Plan
(RKT) document.
Informant. 1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
be made public, indiscriminating, and sufficient.
S1.5
Management unit
infrastructure utilization bythe community.
In daily social economic environment, themanagement unit permits the local community to
use the physical facilities built in the concessionarea given that it does not disrupt any processand not endangering the safety of the community.
1. The local community ispermitted to use the roadway
built in the unit area andother physical facilities inother management unit.
2. The community is permittedto use social facilities built in
management unit camps.
3. Description on the
infrastructure used by thecommunity and the system
of utilization.
Data on the availablephysical and social
facilities.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
3. Observation.
1. In-depth interview.
2. Group discussion.
3. Observation.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
S2.1
The management unit
In forest utilization activities, the management
unit must consider the social and cultural impact
1. No physical border between
and within the community
1. Area map.
2. Worker.
1. Informant.
2. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
considers the social
cultural impact to thecommunity.
such as isolation caused by a condition where a
community is separated from the forest utilizationprocess; impact causing cultural degradationsuch as the impairment of a historical site and lost
of access to perform social cultural activities in acertain location caused by the process.
regions.
2. Identification of culturalideas, activities, and artifacts
in the concession area.
3. The assurance of sustaining
social cultural activities in theconcession area.
3. Observation.
S2.2
Consequences towards
utilization or damage ofresources owned by localcommunity.
The management unit recompenses the
consequences caused by its activities thatimpairs the natural resources, transfers of rights
of ownership and the possibility of utilizing localknowledge. The recompensation must beperformed rationally and mutually based on
collective agreement and complied by the partiesinvolved. Therefore, the unit is expected todevelop a procedure of compensation towards
the utilization or impairment of resources ownedby the community.
1. Procedure on
recompensation settlementunder the unit’s
management.
2. Prove of recompensation
where the value of land andother natural resourcesowned by the community
that is utilized by the unit isapproved by both parties.
3. Prove of recompensationwhere the value of the
impairment of rights ofownership or resourcesowned by the community
caused by the unit activity isapproved by both parties.
1. Standards or
procedure ofrecompensation.
2. Recompensationdocument.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
S2.3
Increasing the variety of
economic resources for the
Forest utilization activities held by the
management unit are expected to provideeconomic benefit to the local community such as
Identification of the various
occupations created as to thepresence of the management unit.
1. Environmental
Impact Analysesdocument.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
local community. creating employment opportunities related to the
presence. The opportunity will increase thechoices of jobs for the community. The unit is alsoexpected to develop an economic development
program based on the local potentials.
2. Environmental
Management Plan(RKL) and
EnvironmentalMonitoring Plan(RPL) documents
3. Diagnostic studydocument.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
S2.4
A sound environmental
guarantee for the localcommunity.
In forest utilization activities, the managementunit must care about the impact of technology to
the environment, in terms of potential chemicalcontamination or air and noise pollution, etc. theunit must at least demonstrate some effort to
manage the impact.
1. Providing soundenvironmental program.
2. Environmental protectionfrom chemical pollution.
3. Minimal noise disturbanceand good air quality.
1. EnvironmentalImpact Analyses
document.
2. Environmental
Management Plan(RKL) andEnvironmental
Monitoring Plan(RPL) documents
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
3. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
4. Observation.
S2.5
Assurance on community
health status.
The management unit is expected to be
responsible to the community health status. Theresponsibility is demonstrated in proactively
increase the health quality of the community,
1. Increase of variety and
quality of health services bythe unit for the community.
2. Health services subsidy for
Medical records in
Community Health Centersand the management unit.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
3. Observation.
1. Document study
2. In-depth interview
3. Group discussion
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
cooperation with health authorities, and
accessibility of health facility in the managementunit.
the community.
3. Coordination with localhealth authority.
4. Observation.
S2.6
Public facility for local
community.
The management unit supports the structuring ofgeneral facilities as part of the social obligation to
the community. This program is planned and paysclose attention to problems and settlementswithin the community, local necessities, and
participating the community in the planning andimplementation of the program.
1. A planned general facilityprogram for the local
community.
2. Participative planning
process and implementation.
3. Description of general
facility.
1. Diagnostic studydocument.
2. PMDH report.
3. Prove of allocationand realization ofbudget for the
general facilities.
1. Informant.
2. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Observation.
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
S2.7
Functioning the conflict
management process.
The presence of a management unit will affect
the social cultural life of a certain region. Tocontrol the effects of its presence, the unit must
develop a conflict management system whereconflict cases and potentials are discussed,settled and managed. The system must be
performed by the unit and the procedureapproved and accepted by the community. The
procedure must consider the sense of fairnessand balance in the negotiation process. It mustalso be open to all resolution alternatives, from
tribe law, local consensus to formal regulations.
1. Conflict management
procedure
2. Low criminal level.
3. Low violence action.
4. Low racial- or religion-basedconflicts.
1. Conflict settlement
document.
2. Data on criminal acts
(within the unit, policestation, village, etc.).
Informant. 1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
S2.8
Creating and maintainingproductivity of the local
community.
The presence of the management unit is
expected not only submissively affect theeconomic lives but must actively participate indeveloping community economics. The unit’s
activity in community development is representedin various programs in social administrationframe.
1. Identification of diversified
economic activitiesperformed by the communitybefore the presence of the
unit.
2. Description of the effect of
the presence of the unit inbusiness productivity.
3. Contribution of the unittoward the improvement of
community welfare.
1. Diagnostic study
document.
2. PMDH activity report
3. Data on villagepotential.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion groupmember.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
S2.9
Substantial managementunit contributions to theeconomic development in
the management unit area.
Besides providing economic values to thecommunity, the presence of a management unit
must also provide an equal benefit to a widerextent. The contribution can be in the form of
retribution and/or tax for regional development.
1. The amount of retribution/taxfor the area.
2. The amount of the unit'spurchase in the local market.
3. The extent of the circulation
1. Data on taxcontribution and other
retribution.
2. Other related
document (purchase,
Informant. 1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
Other contribution is a wider market in the region
surrounding the unit.
of money in the unit area. expenditure note,
etc.).
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
S3.1
Safety and health ofworkers.
In running forest business, a management unitmust pay attention to the health and safety of
workers such as providing health assurancefacility, work protection instruments, regulations
that provides assurance on work safety, and first-aid facilities. Besides for permanent workers, theprotection of health and work safety must also
include daily and collective workers.
1. Health and safety assurancesystem for workers.
2. The availability of workprotection and security
system and tools.
3. Adequate health facility and
service for workers.
4. Low accident level and
sickness from work.
1. Jamsostekdocument.
2. Work safetyregulation instruction.
3. Report on policlinic
and worker medicalrecord.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion groupmember.
3. Observation.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
4. Observation.
S3.2
Labor involvement in
contract arrangement.
As a part of the production unit, workers must be
involved from the beginning in understandingtheir rights and obligations. This is represented in
participating their representatives in the LaborUnion in the agreement arrangement process thatexplains their position, rights and obligations in a
management unit. This agreement is a statementof the rights and obligations of workers and themanagement unit that binds the two parties and
acts as a media to create a congenial industrialrelations.
1. Employment agreement
created and/or approvedtogether.
2. The worker acknowledgehis/her rights and
obligations.
3. The worker acknowledge the
management unitorganization structure and
his/her job description.
1. Employment
agreementdocument.
2. Organizationstructure of the
management unit.
3. KKB document
containing jobdescription, rights
and obligations.
1. Informant.
2. Group discussion
member.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
S3.3
Assurance for freedom ofunion.
As part of the workers’ right to articulate theiropinions, the management unit provides freedom
to unite in a democratic, permanent, sustainable,independent manner and formed voluntarily. The
labor union will be a media for protecting anddefending the rights and interest of the workers.
The presence of a labor union thatis democratic, permanent,
sustainable, and independent.
1. Labor unionestablishment
documents.
2. Related documents.
1. Informant.
2. Group discussionmember.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion
DATA & INFORMATIONINDICATOR DEFINITION VERIFIER
SECONDARY PRIMARY
METHOD OF
VERIFICATION/SAMPLING
S3.4
Facilities supporting labor
welfare.
The management unit must consider the workers
as company asset. It should be represented inthe procurement of welfare facilities in the
working area and homes.
1. The availability of health
insurance for workers andtheir family.
2. Good housing and suitableenvironment.
3. Religion, recreation,
1. Employees’ Social
Security (Jamsostek),KKB document.
2. List of availablesocial and general
facilities.
1. Informant.
2. Discussion group
member.
3. Observation.
1. Document study
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
4. Observation.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
education and sports
facilities.
4. Economic facilities such as,
market, co-op, canteen,stores, etc.
3. Other related
documents.
S3.5
Career improvement
opportunity for all laborforce.
The unit management provides an open careersystem for all employees based on potential andachievements. The positions are based on
evaluation of capability, in a clear andindiscriminating promotion system.
Description on employee structuresystem.
1. Long Term PlantationForest ManagementPlan (RKPHT)
document
2. Annual Work Plan
(RKT) document
3. Employment
regulations.
Informant. 1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
S3.6
Enhancement of education
and skill for all labor force.
The management unit seriously conducts training
and skill development activities for all employeesas part of employment capability and productivity
improvement program. The program can beperformed in the unit or sending to anotherinstitution. The unit provides plans and
procedures for all employees to have the sameopportunity.
1. Providing sustainable plans
to improve employees’education and skill.
2. Prove of efforts in educationand skill improvement.
3. Number of employeesparticipated in the training
and education program, typeand frequency of trainingand education.
1. Education and
training plans.
2. Prove of participation
in a training program.
Informant. 1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
S3.7
Labor wage comply withlocal standard.
Pay and remuneration structure implemented bythe management unit, for permanent, daily and
collective employees must meet local standards.
1. The amount of paymentmust be able to provide
sufficient living according to
1. Employee wage list.
2. Regulation onovertime, premium
1. Informant.
2. Discussion groupmember.
1. Document study.
2. In-depth interview.
3. Group discussion.
LEI-03 Technical DocumentVerifier Toolbox and Verification for Assessment Indicators in PHTL Certification System
The amount of money received must be able to
provide sufficient living for the employee and thefamily according to local standard.
local living standard.
2. Additional payment forovertime, premium, and
achievement bonus.
and bonus.