verification at ecmwf...•regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be...

26
Verification at ECMWF Thomas Haiden and Martin Janousek European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Forecast Analysis

Upload: others

Post on 25-Feb-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

© ECMWF October 12, 2015

Verification at ECMWF

Thomas Haiden and Martin JanousekEuropean Centre for Medium-RangeWeather Forecasts

Forecast Analysis

Page 2: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

2

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

Page 3: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

3

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

Page 4: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

4

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

Page 5: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

5

Anomaly correlation of 500 hPa geopotential

Page 6: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

6

Improvement relative to ERA-Interim

Upper-air

Surface

Page 7: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

7

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

RMSE

against SYNOP

Page 8: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

8

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

RMSE

against SYNOP

against analysisobs+repres error,unresolved processes

Page 9: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

9

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

MSE

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC(2.8 K)2

against SYNOPagainst analysis

Page 10: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

10

2-m temperature error growth: DJF 2016-17

MSE

NH Extratropics, 12 UTC

against SYNOP

T850

against analysis

Page 11: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

11

Regional variations

RMSE

Page 12: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

12

Regional variations

Stations excluded where ∆z>150m

RMSE

Page 13: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

13

Regional variations

SDEV

Page 14: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

14

Europe

SDEV

Problem: strong surface inversions over snow

Problem: low stratus boundaries and persistence

Page 15: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

October 29, 2014

T2m forecast skill evolution (ENS) – Day 5

All errors

CRPS

Percentage of large errors

P(CRPS > 5 K)

Horizontal resolution upgrades

CRPS decreased by ~10%Frequency of large errors decreased by ~20%

Page 16: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

TIGGE scores (CRPSS) – DJF 2016 and 2017

CMCJMANCEPUKMOECMWF

Z500 T850

T2M PRECIP

Page 17: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Precipitation forecast skill

HRES ENS

Overestimation of frequency of light precipitation still an issue, especially in summer (convection)

Page 18: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

10 m wind speed verification

Systematic error (bias) ‘Random’ error (standard deviation)

Page 19: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Systematic error (bias) ‘Random’ error (standard deviation)

10 m wind speed verification

Page 20: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

High-impact weather

2m temperature 10m wind speed

24-h precipitation

Tropical cyclones Extreme forecast index (EFI)

Page 21: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Verification on the ECMWF webpage

Page 22: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Model upgrade 11 July 2017 (Cycle 43r3)

https://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/USS/IFS+cycle+43r3+scorecard

Verification against analysis

Page 23: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Model upgrade 11 July 2017 (Cycle 43r3)

https://software.ecmwf.int/wiki/display/USS/IFS+cycle+43r3+scorecard

Verification against

observations

Page 24: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Conclusions

• Medium-range NWP further improving – ECMWF leading the way

• Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed

• Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

• Promising developments for future cycles (e.g. ocean coupling, cloud physics)

Page 25: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Random error,

normalized

Random error

10 m wind speed verification

Page 26: Verification at ECMWF...•Regional-scale systematic errors in surface parameters, need to be addressed •Frequency of large errors in ENS 2-m temperature: additional headline score

Random error,

normalized

Mean wind speed (observed)

10 m wind speed verification