vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · pdf filetal crust is here used as...

11
For permission to copy, contact [email protected] © 2007 Geological Society of America Geosphere; June 2007; v. 3; no. 3; p. 152–162; doi: 10.1130/GES00070.1; 8 figures; 4 tables. ABSTRACT The spatial clustering of vents in basaltic volcanic fields within a stretched continen- tal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering with a power-law dis- tribution defined by the correlation expo- nent (D) computed in a range with lower and upper cutoffs. The upper cutoff for the fractal clustering of vents yields the thick- ness of the crust. The spatial distribution of vents is analyzed in the Afar Depression (the northern termination of the East African Rift system in Africa), where the continental crust has thinned considerably. More than 1700 vents were identified and mapped in the Afar region through the use of Landsat ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper) satellite image mosaics. Vents cluster in seven main groups corresponding to the principal structural features of the Afar Depression. The mapped vents are generally younger than 2 Ma, and most are Holocene age. The Afar vents show self-similar clustering (D = 1.39 ± 0.02) in the ~2–23 km range. The upper cutoff of ~23 km matches well the thickness of the crust in the Afar region as derived from seismic and grav- ity data (~25 km). The distribution of vents in the Afar Depression is compared with that of vents in the northern Main Ethiopian Rift. Keywords: volcanic fields, cone distribution, crustal thickness, rift, Africa, Afar. INTRODUCTION Volcanic eruption requires hydraulically open pathways that allow magmas to move upward from crustal or subcrustal reservoirs to the sur- face. The bulk permeability of the crust may be enhanced through fracturing; rock-fracturing processes allow the ascent of magma at rates that are akin to the time scale characterizing volcanic activity (Rubin, 1993; Petford et al., 2000; Canon-Tapia and Walker, 2004). It has been proposed that fractures filled by magma (i.e., dikes) tend to coalesce during their ascent to the surface, thereby controlling the final level of magma emplacement and the distribution of volcanic vents at the surface (Takada, 1994a, 1994b; Ito and Martel, 2002). Evidence for hydrofracturing has also been observed in man- tle rocks from mid-ocean ridges (Cannat, 1996) and in ophiolites (Nicolas et al., 1994). The link between volcanism and tectonics has long been recognized (e.g., Nakamura, 1977; Takada, 1994a; van Vyk de Vries and Merle, 1996), and essentially depends on two main parameters: (1) brittle deformation of the crust (fracture network formation), and (2) magma availability (magma supply rate and eruptive style). The link between fractures and volcanic vents has been established, especially for mono- genetic volcanoes (Tibaldi, 1995). Monogenetic volcanoes are volcanic vents formed during single episodes of volcanic activity, and occur in volcanic fields composed of tens to hundreds of monogenetic vents (Connor and Conway, 2000). Volcanic fields are common in continental rifts and in backarc extensional areas; they often comprise both monogenetic and polygenetic volcanoes that are essentially basaltic in com- position (Connor and Conway, 2000; Mazzarini and D’Orazio, 2003; Mazzarini, 2004; Mazza- rini et al., 2004). The basaltic composition of cones in volcanic fields testifies to the presence of deep crustal or subcrustal magma reservoirs requiring a connected fracture network through- out the crust to feed cones. The correlation between vent distribution and fracture network properties is such that the spa- tial distribution of vents may be studied in terms of self-similar (fractal) clustering (Pelletier, 1999; Mazzarini, 2004), as in the case of frac- ture networks (Bour and Davy, 1999; Bonnet et al., 2001). Findings based on this approach suggest that, for basaltic volcanic fields in a stretched continental crust, the distribution of monogenetic vents is linked to the mechanical layering of the crust (Mazzarini, 2004). Vents tend to cluster according to a power-law distri- bution defined over a range of lengths approxi- mating the thickness of the fractured medium (crust). This correlation has been studied in volcanic fields within extensional continental settings in backarcs, such as in southernmost Patagonia (Mazzarini and D’Orazio, 2003), and in continental rifts, such as the Ethiopian Rift system (Mazzarini, 2004). The hypothesized link between vent cluster- ing and crustal thickness is investigated in the Afar Depression, the most stretched portion of the East African Rift system connecting the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden oceanic spreading axes with the Main Ethiopian Rift (e.g., Bonini et al., 2005). The East African Rift system is a classic seismically and volcanically active continental rift extending several thousands of kilometers in a N-S direction (e.g., Rosendahl, 1987; Braile et al., 1995; Chorowicz, 2005); it accommodates extension between the Nubian (Africa) and Somalian plates (e.g., Chu and Gordon, 1999). The bulging and extension of the crust and the consequent widespread volcanism have been ascribed to the impinging of one or two plumes on the base of the East Africa crust (Ebinger and Sleep, 1998; Rogers et al., 2000) or, more recently, to a broader mantle upwelling (the Afri- can superplume); the Afar hotspot is a surface manifestation of this (Benoit et al., 2006). Sev- eral volcanic fields occur in the Afar Depression, where volcanic rocks are widespread; this region is thus a natural laboratory to test the hypoth- esized correlation between crustal thickness and the upper limit (upper cutoff) of the power law describing the distribution of vents. This correla- tion has been described for the northern part of the Main Ethiopian Rift (Mazzarini, 2004) and is here investigated for the Afar Depression, where the locations of several monogenetic vents have been identified and their spatial clustering has been analyzed in terms of self-similar cluster- ing. Results will be compared with crustal thick- nesses derived from existing geophysical data on the selected study sites. Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched continental crust: The case of the Afar Depression (Ethiopia) Francesco Mazzarini* Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Pisa, Via della Faggiola 32, 56100 Pisa, Italy *E-mail: [email protected]. 152

Upload: ngohanh

Post on 14-Mar-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

For permission to copy, contact [email protected]© 2007 Geological Society of America

Geosphere; June 2007; v. 3; no. 3; p. 152–162; doi: 10.1130/GES00070.1; 8 fi gures; 4 tables.

ABSTRACT

The spatial clustering of vents in basaltic volcanic fi elds within a stretched continen-tal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering with a power-law dis-tribution defi ned by the correlation expo-nent (D) computed in a range with lower and upper cutoffs. The upper cutoff for the fractal clustering of vents yields the thick-ness of the crust. The spatial distribution of vents is analyzed in the Afar Depression (the northern termination of the East African Rift system in Africa), where the continental crust has thinned considerably. More than 1700 vents were identifi ed and mapped in the Afar region through the use of Landsat ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper) satellite image mosaics. Vents cluster in seven main groups corresponding to the principal structural features of the Afar Depression. The mapped vents are generally younger than 2 Ma, and most are Holocene age. The Afar vents show self-similar clustering (D = 1.39 ± 0.02) in the ~2–23 km range. The upper cutoff of ~23 km matches well the thickness of the crust in the Afar region as derived from seismic and grav-ity data (~25 km). The distribution of vents in the Afar Depression is compared with that of vents in the northern Main Ethiopian Rift.

Keywords: volcanic fi elds, cone distribution, crustal thickness, rift, Africa, Afar.

INTRODUCTION

Volcanic eruption requires hydraulically open pathways that allow magmas to move upward from crustal or subcrustal reservoirs to the sur-face. The bulk permeability of the crust may be enhanced through fracturing; rock-fracturing processes allow the ascent of magma at rates that are akin to the time scale characterizing

volcanic activity (Rubin, 1993; Petford et al., 2000; Canon-Tapia and Walker, 2004). It has been proposed that fractures fi lled by magma (i.e., dikes) tend to coalesce during their ascent to the surface, thereby controlling the fi nal level of magma emplacement and the distribution of volcanic vents at the surface (Takada, 1994a, 1994b; Ito and Martel, 2002). Evidence for hydrofracturing has also been observed in man-tle rocks from mid-ocean ridges (Cannat, 1996) and in ophiolites (Nicolas et al., 1994).

The link between volcanism and tectonics has long been recognized (e.g., Nakamura, 1977; Takada, 1994a; van Vyk de Vries and Merle, 1996), and essentially depends on two main parameters: (1) brittle deformation of the crust (fracture network formation), and (2) magma availability (magma supply rate and eruptive style). The link between fractures and volcanic vents has been established, especially for mono-genetic volcanoes (Tibaldi, 1995). Monogenetic volcanoes are volcanic vents formed during single episodes of volcanic activity, and occur in volcanic fi elds composed of tens to hundreds of monogenetic vents (Connor and Conway, 2000). Volcanic fi elds are common in continental rifts and in backarc extensional areas; they often comprise both monogenetic and polygenetic volcanoes that are essentially basaltic in com-position (Connor and Conway, 2000; Mazzarini and D’Orazio, 2003; Mazzarini, 2004; Mazza-rini et al., 2004). The basaltic composition of cones in volcanic fi elds testifi es to the presence of deep crustal or subcrustal magma reservoirs requiring a connected fracture network through-out the crust to feed cones.

The correlation between vent distribution and fracture network properties is such that the spa-tial distribution of vents may be studied in terms of self-similar (fractal) clustering (Pelletier, 1999; Mazzarini, 2004), as in the case of frac-ture networks (Bour and Davy, 1999; Bonnet et al., 2001). Findings based on this approach suggest that, for basaltic volcanic fi elds in a stretched continental crust, the distribution of monogenetic vents is linked to the mechanical

layering of the crust (Mazzarini, 2004). Vents tend to cluster according to a power-law distri-bution defi ned over a range of lengths approxi-mating the thickness of the fractured medium (crust). This correlation has been studied in volcanic fi elds within extensional continental settings in backarcs, such as in southernmost Patagonia (Mazzarini and D’Orazio, 2003), and in continental rifts, such as the Ethiopian Rift system (Mazzarini, 2004).

The hypothesized link between vent cluster-ing and crustal thickness is investigated in the Afar Depression, the most stretched portion of the East African Rift system connecting the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden oceanic spreading axes with the Main Ethiopian Rift (e.g., Bonini et al., 2005). The East African Rift system is a classic seismically and volcanically active continental rift extending several thousands of kilometers in a N-S direction (e.g., Rosendahl, 1987; Braile et al., 1995; Chorowicz, 2005); it accommodates extension between the Nubian (Africa) and Somalian plates (e.g., Chu and Gordon, 1999). The bulging and extension of the crust and the consequent widespread volcanism have been ascribed to the impinging of one or two plumes on the base of the East Africa crust (Ebinger and Sleep, 1998; Rogers et al., 2000) or, more recently, to a broader mantle upwelling (the Afri-can superplume); the Afar hotspot is a surface manifestation of this (Benoit et al., 2006). Sev-eral volcanic fi elds occur in the Afar Depression, where volcanic rocks are widespread; this region is thus a natural laboratory to test the hypoth-esized correlation between crustal thickness and the upper limit (upper cutoff) of the power law describing the distribution of vents. This correla-tion has been described for the northern part of the Main Ethiopian Rift (Mazzarini, 2004) and is here investigated for the Afar Depression, where the locations of several monogenetic vents have been identifi ed and their spatial clustering has been analyzed in terms of self-similar cluster-ing. Results will be compared with crustal thick-nesses derived from existing geophysical data on the selected study sites.

Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched continental crust: The case of the Afar Depression (Ethiopia)

Francesco Mazzarini*Istituto Nazionale di Geofi sica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Pisa, Via della Faggiola 32, 56100 Pisa, Italy

*E-mail: [email protected].

152

Page 2: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Vent in Afar

Geosphere, June 2007 153

GEOLOGICAL SETTING OF THE AFAR DEPRESSION

The Afar Valley is located at the confl uence of the Main Ethiopian Rift, the western Gulf of Aden, and the southern Red Sea (Fig. 1). The low-lying part of the Afar triple junction covers an area of ~200,000 km2 called the Afar Depres-sion. It is fl anked to the west and the southeast by the Ethiopian and Somali Plateaus and to the east by the Danakil and Aysha’a blocks (Fig. 1). Elevations in the adjacent plateaus reach 3000 m, and in the Danakil Alps exceed 2100 m. These elevations are in marked contrast with those of the depression, which range from about +800 m to −100 m. This low-lying region is dotted with a number of topographically high shield volca-noes (CNR–CNRS-Afar team, 1973; Barberi and Varet, 1977; Mohr, 1983).

The geology of the Afar Depression has been investigated since the early 1970s (Gass, 1970; CNR–CNRS-Afar team, 1973; Barberi and Varet, 1977; Zanettin et al., 1978; Merla et al., 1979; Zanettin, 1993; Tefera et al., 1996; Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b; Kidane et al., 2003; Bosworth et al., 2005; Beyene and Abdelsalam, 2005). The depression is mainly fl oored by Pliocene and younger volcanic rocks. Based on the above studies, the following divisions can be made: (1) a pre-rift sequence consisting of Neopro-terozoic basement rocks, Mesozoic sedimen-tary rocks, and pre-Miocene volcanic and igne-ous rocks; (2) lava fl ows of the Afar Stradoid series; (3) lava fl ows of the late Stradoid basal-tic series; (4) deposits of Pliocene–Pleistocene silicic centers; (5) basalts of the rift segments; and (6) Quaternary sediments (Fig. 2).

Interaction between the southern Red Sea and Aden oceanic ridges and the Afar stretched conti-nental crust led to the formation of rifts and asso-ciated volcanism (Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b, and references therein). Five main physiographic units thus defi ne the Afar Depression: the rift plateaus (Ethiopia and Somalia Plateaus), the Danakil-Aysha’a blocks, the Danakil depression (North Afar), the Central Afar, and the South Afar (Fig. 2).

The rift plateau unit comprises the highest areas fl anking the Afar Depression. It consists of pre-Miocene and Miocene basaltic and rhyolitic lava fl ows (Trap series); a series of fault escarp-ments mark the transition between this unit and the rift depression (e.g., Lahitte et al., 2003a; Beyene and Abdelsalam, 2005).

The Danakil and the Aysha’a blocks fl anking the eastern border of the Afar Depression con-sist of basement rocks, old Miocene volcanic rocks, recent lava fl ows, and volcanoes (Fig. 2; e.g., Beyene and Abdelsalam, 2005).

The Danakil depression, or North Afar, is between the Danakil-Aysha’a blocks and the western rift plateau, and represents an area of highly thinned crust (e.g., Redfi eld et al., 2003) affected by active volcanism and crustal exten-sion (Wright et al., 2006). This area is character-ized by the occurrence of NNW-SSE–trending axial volcanoes that mark the inland propaga-tion of the Red Sea ridge (Manighetti et al., 1998, and references therein). Basaltic volca-nism is Quaternary to Holocene (Lahitte et al., 2993a, 2003b, and references therein) and has produced several scoria cones and eruptive fi s-sures (Fig. 3). Faults and fractures strike NW-SE and NNW-SSE, following the rift trends.

In Central Afar, the Aden Ridge spurred the development of minor rift systems (Manighetti et al., 1998, and references therein). The area is characterized by the intersection of the N-S faults marking the western escarpment, the NE-SW faults of the Main Ethiopian Rift, and the NW-SE and E-W faults of the propagat-ing rifts (Manda Hararo–Goba’ad and Manda Inakir–Asal-Ghoubbet rifts). The Manda Hararo–Goba’ad system consists of NNW-SSE, NW-SE, and E-W rifts as long as 80 km and several kilometers wide. Rifts are character-ized by active deformation and axial volcanic ranges. Both silicic and basaltic magmas have erupted (Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b, and refer-ences therein); the oldest silicic lavas are ca. 1.3 Ma, and 30 ka basalts are widespread (Lahitte et al., 2003a). Deformation in the Manda Hararo rift segments becomes younger southeastward (Manighetti et al., 1998), and basaltic volcanism (spatter cones and eruptive fi ssures) postdates the formation of large silicic volcanoes (Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b). Three main fault systems interact in the Manda Hararo–Goba’ad area: the NW-SE Red Sea, the E-W Aden Ridge, and the NE-SW South Afar systems. On the basis of structural and geomorphic considerations, Tes-faye et al. (2003) located the present position of the Afar triple junction in this area. The Manda Inakir–Asal-Ghoubbet system is composed of several rifts resulting from the encroachment on land in the Afar region by the Aden Ridge (e.g., Manighetti et al., 1998). All these structures mark the southeast to northwest propagation of seismically (e.g., Hofstetter and Beyth, 2003) and volcanically (e.g., Lahitte et al., 2003a) active rifts. The southeastern segments (Asal-Ghoubbet rifts), ~40 km long and 10 km wide, strike NW-SE. The northwestern propagation of deformation is associated with volcanism lead-ing to the formation of spatter cones and erup-tive fi ssures. The northwestern Manda Inakir rift is a NW-SE structure with a NNW-trend-ing, right-stepping array of three main segments (Manighetti et al., 1998). The Manda Inakir rift

is ~10 km long and 3 km wide. Recent volca-nism in the Manda Inakir–Asal-Ghoubbet rifts has produced basaltic lavas, shield volcanoes, and numerous spatter cones; these volcanic centers have Pleistocene and Holocene ages (Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b), and formed above volcanic surfaces dated as 3 Ma (Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b).

The South Afar is dominated by N- to NE-trending horst and graben structures; it connects the NE-SW– and NNE-SSW–trending fault sys-tems of the northern Main Ethiopian Rift with the NW-SE– and E-W–trending rifts of Central Afar (Tesfaye et al., 2003; Fig. 2).

The Afar region is characterized by strong crustal attenuation: Bouguer gravity data indi-cate crustal thinning (Makris and Ginzburg, 1987; Woldetinsae and Gotze, 2005) with an average thickness of ~25 km. Inverse model-ing of gravity data shows a crustal thickness of 23 km in the Afar Depression and 24 km in South Afar (Tiberi et al., 2005). Differences in the elastic thickness of the lithosphere derived by gravity data inversion (Ebinger and Hay-ward, 1996; Hayward and Ebinger, 1996) indi-cate that the Main Ethiopian Rift and Afar have undergone different degrees of stretching. Seis-mic refraction data imaged a crustal thickness of 28–30 km in the northern Main Ethiopian Rift, 23–25 km in the southern Afar region, and only 15 km in the Danakil depression to the north (Berckhemer et al., 1975; Prodehl and Mechie, 1991; Prodehl, et al., 1997). Analysis of receiver functions from broadband seismic data (Dugda et al., 2005) reveals that the crust is 27–30 km thick in the Main Ethiopian Rift, and 25 km thick in the Afar Depression. Both gravity and seismic data reveal a crustal thickness of 35–40 km in the shoulders of the rifts.

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF VOLCANOES

The spacing of volcanoes in relationship to crustal thickness, fracture patterns, and litho-spheric thickness at convergent and divergent plate boundaries has been debated since the early 1970s (e.g., Vogt, 1974); in extending oceanic and continental plates, it has been linked to the response of the lithosphere to the load of the vol-canic pile (e.g., ten Brink, 1991). In particular, the spacing of central volcanoes within continental rift settings has been linked to the elastic thick-ness of the lithosphere (Mohr and Wood, 1976). Vent alignment has often been used (1) to infer the direction of the minimum horizontal princi-pal stress (Lutz, 1986; Wadge and Cross, 1988), (2) as evidence for structural control on vent location (Connor, 1990; Connor et al., 1992), and (3) to outline the importance of strain rate in

Page 3: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Mazzarini

154 Geosphere, June 2007

45 5040353025 55

Figure 1. Location map of the Horn of Africa (digital elevation map [DEM] from GEOTOPO30 data set; http://edc.usgs.gov/products/elevation/gtopo30/gtopo30.html). AD—Afar Depression; EP—Ethi-opian Plateau; SP—Somalian Plateau; MER—Main Ethiopian Rift. Axes represent degrees lati-tude and longitude. Inset: Physio-graphic units in the Afar Depres-sion (DEM from GEOTOPO30 data set; http://edc.usgs.gov/prod-ucts/elevation/gtopo30/gtopo30.html). DB—Danakil block; AB—Aysha’a block; NA—North Afar; CA—Central Afar; SA—South Afar; EP—Ethiopian and Soma-lian Plateaus; EA—Erta Ale, Ala-yuto, and Tat Ale axial volcanoes; MIG—Manda Inakir–Ghoubbet rifts; MHG—Manda Hararo–Goba’ad rifts.

Page 4: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Vent in Afar

Geosphere, June 2007 155

the style of volcanism (Takada, 1994a; Alaniz-Alvarez et al., 1998; Mazzarini et al., 2004). A strong correlation between fractures and vent alignments has been identifi ed in active Holo-cene volcanic fi elds (e.g., Iceland, Kamchatka); these geometric relationships have been ascribed to the exploitation of favorably oriented preexist-ing structures by the ascending magma (Connor and Conway, 2000, and references therein). The feeder system of monogenetic apparatuses (see Connor and Conway, 2000) consists of dikes, and the fl ow of magma may be represented as a channeled fl ow through a rock volume enhanced by secondary permeability (i.e., permeability due to fractures in the rock volume). Each feeder may be used only one time, as the cooled magma seals the hydraulic pathway. This condition is met in cinder and spatter cones within volcanic fi elds. Several types of eruptive vents may be assumed to be monogenetic apparatuses: cones, small vents along fractures, and eruptive frac-tures. I (Mazzarini, 2004) developed a simple model for visualizing the relationship between vents and the geometric properties of fractures. This model assumes that the aperture of a frac-ture is greatest at its barycenter and that volcanic vents erupt at the point of maximum fracture aperture (Fig. 4); the resulting vent distribution is thus closely linked to the hydraulic properties of both the crust and fractures.

HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF FRACTURES AND VENT DISTRIBUTION

The connectivity of fractures defi nes the por-tion of the existing fracture network that hydrau-lically connects the system boundaries, allowing fl uids to fl ow (Margolin et al., 1998; Darcel et al., 2003). In a rock volume the connected net-work is a subset of the existing fracture network (e.g., Roberts et al., 1998, 1999), defi ned as the backbone in percolation theory (Stauffer and Aharony, 1992).

Hydraulic features of fractures such as frac-ture connectivity and aperture are scale invariant (Bonnet et al., 2001). In particular, the spatial clustering of a fracture network, represented as the fracture barycenter, has been directly linked to the hydraulic properties of the fracture net-work (Renshaw, 1999; Bour and Davy, 1999; Darcel et al., 2003). Assuming a direct genetic and spatial link between fracture and vent (Con-nor and Conway, 2000; Mazzarini, 2004), scale invariance in vent distribution refl ects the frac-tal properties of the connected part of a fracture network (i.e., the backbone).

The main geometric features of a fracture net-work are generally measured and mapped (frac-ture attitude, aperture, spacing, intersections,

10°

14°

40° 43°100 km

N

Assab

Red Sea

Central Afar

Danakil D

epression

Eth

iop

ian

Pla

teau

Eth

iop

ian

Pla

teau

Ayshaa B

lock

Danakil Block

NM

ER

South Afar

Somalian Plateau

Figure 2. Geological sketch map of the Afar Depression (after CNR–CNRS-Afar team, 1973; Merla et al., 1979; Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b; Kidane et al., 2003; Bosworth et al., 2005; Beyene and Abdelsalam, 2005). White—Quaternary sediments and volcaniclastic deposits. Red—Pleistocene–Holocene basaltic vol-canism. Yellow—Pliocene–Pleistocene silicic centers. Orange—lava fl ows of the late Afar Stratoid basaltic series (late Pliocene). Light gray—lava fl ows of the Afar Stratoid series (Miocene–Pliocene). Dark gray—pre-rift sequence consisting of Neoproterozoic basement rocks, Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, and pre-Miocene volcanic and igne-ous rocks. Thick dashed lines—main tectonic features; thin black lines—faults (after Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b; Kidane et al., 2003; Bosworth et al., 2005; Beyene and Abdelsalam, 2005). NMER—northern Main Ethiopian Rift.

Page 5: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Mazzarini

156 Geosphere, June 2007

length, and density) at different scales of obser-vation, from satellite images to fi eld mapping, showing scale invariance spanning several orders of magnitude (Bonnet et al., 2001; Mar-rett et al., 1999). The way in which fractures fi ll space (i.e., the spatial distribution of fractures) depends strictly on the spacing of fractures. The latter geometric feature is correlated with the thickness of the fractured medium calculated on the basis of the stress saturation model (Wu and Pollard, 1995; Gross et al., 1995; Ackermann and Schlische, 1997).

A robust way to defi ne how fractures fi ll space is to analyze their self-similar clustering (Bonnet et al., 2001). The defi nition of self-similar clus-tering for the analyzed spatial correlation of frac-tures (i.e., computation of the fractal exponent; see Bonnet et al., 2001, and references therein) is performed for a range of lengths (the size range) between a lower and an upper cutoff.

The upper cutoff is here considered to be directly linked to the mechanical layering of the medium. Mandelbrot (1982) suggested that there are upper and lower cutoffs for the scale-invari-ant characteristics of fractures (e.g., spacing,

length, density), and that these are functions of mechanical layers and rock properties. Experi-mental studies on normal fault populations sug-gest the presence of upper and lower cutoffs in the power law describing the distribution of the geometric properties of fractures (Ackermann et al., 2001). Moreover, the thickness of both sedi-mentary beds and the crust controls the scaling law of fractures and earthquakes (Pacheco et al., 1992; Davy, 1993; Ouillon et al., 1996).

The dependence of the fracture network spa-tial distribution on the rheologic layering of the medium (i.e., the crust) can also be inferred from the connected part of the network. The connected fracture network allows basaltic magma to rise to the surface from deep crustal or subcrustal reservoirs, passing through most or the whole of the crust. Analysis of the fractal character of the spatial distribution of vents can thus reveal the mechanical layering of the crust.

DATA ACQUISITION

Landsat 7 ETM+ (enhanced thematic map-per) images were used to identify and map

Crust

Wet fracture (dike)

Dry fracture

Vent

Sill

H

200 km

N

MHG

MIG

NA

SA

CA

EA

EPFig. 3B

A

8 km

a

a

B

N

Figure 3. RGB (red, green, blue) false color composite of Landsat ETM (enhanced thematic mapper) image mosaic (courtesy of the University of Maryland University Global Land Cover Facility; http://glfc.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml), band ETM+ band 7 in the red channel, ETM+ band 4 in the green channel, and ETM+ band 2 in the blue channel. (A) General overview of the Afar Depression. NA—North Afar; CA—Central Afar; SA—South Afar; EP—Ethio-pian Plateau; EA—Erta Ale volcano Range; MIG—Manda Inakir–Ghoubbet rifts; MHG—Manda Hararo–Goba’ad rifts. (B) Close-up view of the MIG area clearly showing recent and older scoria cones. Red and orange hues are old cones, and dark blue hues are young cones (a in the fi gure).

Figure 4. Conceptual model of relationships among the fracture network, dikes, and vents in a volcanic fi eld. Only the connected portion of the fracture network feeds the vents. H is the crust thickness.

Page 6: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Vent in Afar

Geosphere, June 2007 157

volcanic vents (Goward et al., 2001; http://land-sathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/handbook.html). A mosaic of 29 ETM images was used to map a large portion of East African Rift system (cour-tesy of the Maryland University Global Land Cover Facility; http://glfc.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml). The images are georeferenced to the Universal Transverse Mercator projection (zone 37 N –WGS84) and displayed as RGB (red, green, blue) false color composites (with ETM+ band 7 in the red channel, ETM+ band 4 in the green channel, and ETM+ band 2 in the blue channel). The original spatial resolution of Landsat ETM+ images is 30 × 30 m. The 15 × 15 m spatial resolution of the Landsat ETM+ mosaic was obtained through a color transform using the 15 × 15 m geometric resolution of the Landsat ETM+ panchromatic band (Janza et al., 1975; Vrabel, 1996). One Landsat 7 ETM+ scene was also processed to investigate the spectral behavior of basaltic scoria cones (path 167 row 051, acquisition date 28 Novem-ber 2000, courtesy of the Maryland University Global Land Cover Facility; http://glfc.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml).

Images clearly show volcanic features as well as fractures and faults (Fig. 3), and vent posi-tions were identifi ed in a geographic informa-tion system environment (ArcView 3.3). The locations of vents were identifi ed on the satellite images with an accuracy of one pixel (i.e., 15 × 15 m). This error in vent location is lower than that arising through the use of 1:50,000 scale topographic maps (Mazzarini, 2004). Moreover, relationships between vents and fractures are well imaged by the synoptic view of satellite images. As many as 1725 vents were identifi ed, and their coordinates were stored in a fi le. The vents are located in structurally controlled areas, where they are unevenly distributed.

Afar Vents

In order to identify the occurrence of vent clusters in the Afar Depression, the spatial distribution of vents was investigated through multivariate analysis by applying a clustering approach based on an agglomerative hierarchical method (using the MINITAB statistical software package). This approach is used when clusters are initially unknown. The optimal number of clusters is derived by analyzing the dendrogram (Fig. 5) that depicts the amalgamation of obser-vations into one cluster. The similarity at any step is defi ned as the percent of the minimum distance at that step relative to the maximum interobservation distance (i.e., the maximum distance between the vents in this case). The step where values change abruptly may mark the point for cutting the dendrogram. Eight clusters

were identifi ed for the analyzed vents (Fig. 5). They are characterized by the number of vents, the location of the cluster center (centroid), and by the average distance of all the vents within the cluster from the centroid of their respective cluster. Three clusters are in the Northern Afar unit, two are in the Danakil block, two are in the Central Afar unit, and one is in the South Afar unit (Fig. 6; Table 1).

The identifi ed clusters were subsequently grouped into data sets according to the follow-ing criteria: (1) each data set had to include more than 100 vents to ensure statistical signifi cance (see Mazzarini, 2004); and (2) the data set had to spatially relate to major structural features of the Afar region.

On this basis, six new data sets were gener-ated. They are localized in the following struc-tures of the Afar Depression: two data sets are in the Danakil block: data set DB-na (north of Assab) and data set DB-a (Assab area); one data set is in the North Afar depression: data set NA (zone with Erta Ale, Alayuto, and Tat Ale volcanoes); two sets are in the Central Afar depression: data set CA-1 (Manda Hararo and Goba’ad rifts) and data set CA (Manda Inakir, Asal, Ghoubbet rifts and the western border of the Danakil block); and the last data set is in the South Afar depression: data set SA (junction between Afar and the Main Ethiopian Rift).

A data set (Afar) of all the detected vents in the Afar Depression was also created (Fig. 6).

The identifi ed vents (mainly scoria cones) are generally of Pleistocene and Holocene age (younger than 1.8 Ma) and are mainly basaltic in composition (Lahitte, et al., 2003a, 2003b; Kidane et al., 2003). The detected vents (1725) may be roughly divided into the recent basaltic

lavas of the Erta Ale area (data set NA) and Cen-tral Afar (data sets CA-1 and CA) and the rela-tively older basaltic volcanism. Young basaltic cones generally have dark blue hues, well-pre-served fl anks, and a defi ned crater rim (Fig. 3A), with an average basal diameter of 370 m. Old cones have red hues, show disrupted cones and gullies on their fl anks, and erosion often high-lights cone breaching; their average basal diam-eter is 439 m (Fig. 3B). Old vents share similar morphologic features both in areas with basaltic rocks and in those with silicic rocks. They are all assumed to be basaltic. For example, the vents of data set CA and those of data set SA are all assumed to be basaltic, although the cones are located in areas where silicic volcanic centers also occur (Fig. 2). Using the pixel values in satellite images, a rough spectral comparison between the vents of data set CA (in an area with silicic volcanic rocks) and those of data set DB-na (in an area with recent basaltic rocks) was performed to validate the assumption that all the detected vents have a basaltic composi-tion. The sampled pixels belonging to the CA and DB-na vents show similar pixel values that clearly differ from those of pixels sampled on silicic volcanic centers (Fig. 7).

DATA ANALYSIS

Methods

The Afar vents were analyzed in terms of self-similar clustering and mean vent separation (Mazzarini, 2004); cone density was also inves-tigated. The spatial distribution of vents was analyzed by calculating the correlation exponent D (Bonnet et al., 2001). A two-point correlation

Sim

ilarit

y (%

)

observations100.00

88.13

76.27

64.40

Figure 5. Dendrogram representing the amalgamation of observations into one cluster. The similarity from an initial value of 100% (1725 clusters) decreases to a value of ~89% (pas-sage from red to black trees). At this step there are eight clusters.

Page 7: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Mazzarini

158 Geosphere, June 2007

North Afar

Central Afar

Danakil Block

Danakil Block

South Afar

North Afar

Central Afar

South Afar

Figure 6. Distribution of identifi ed clusters (red squares) and of the six data sets in the Afar. Pink dots—NA data set; white dots—DB-na data set; green dots—DB-a data set; dark blue dots—CA data set; light blue dots—CA-1 data set; orange dots—SA data set (see text). Dashed white lines divide the Afar Depression into North, Cen-tral, and South Afar; dot-ted white circle marks the present position of the Afar triple junction according to Tesfaye et al. (2003). Black thin lines are main fault trends. The shaded eleva-tion model (illumination from the north) is derived from SRTM data (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission; http://srtm.usgs.gov/).

TABLE 1. IDENTIFIED CLUSTERS IN AFAR VENTS DISTRIBUTION

Cl Vents cc-easting (m)

cc-northing (m)

adist-cc (m)

Location Data set

1 294 68,7192 1,453,772 30,807 North Afar NA

2 10 65,6653 1,539,766 8927 North Afar NA

3 45 65,3600 1,404,244 8067 North Afar NA

4 594 81,5092 1,404,542 52,198 Central Afar CA

5 230 81,3794 1,509,105 20,437 Danakil block DB-a

6 215 87,0634 1,441,364 18,338 Danakil block DB-na

7 203 76,4145 1,247,056 30,131 Central Afar CA-1

8 134 70,6441 1,121,904 21,541 South Afar SA Note: cl—cluster number; cc—cluster centroid; adist-cc—average distance from cluster centroid.

Page 8: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Vent in Afar

Geosphere, June 2007 159

function method was used to measure the fractal dimension of the vent population. For a popula-tion of N points (vent centers), the correlation integral C(r) is defi ned as the correlation sum that accounts for all the points at a distance of less than a given length r (Bonnet et al., 2001, and references therein). In this approach, the term C(r) is computed as:

C r

N r

N N( )

( )

( )= ×

× −2

1, (1)

where N(r) is the number of pairs of points whose distance is <r. If scaling holds, equation 1 is valid, and the slope of the curve in a log(C[r]) versus log(r) diagram yields the D value.

Following equation 1, the computed D value is valid for a defi ned range of distances (r). The distance interval over which equation 1 is valid is defi ned by the size range. For each analysis, the size range of samples is in turn defi ned by a plateau in the local slope versus log(r) diagram: the wider the range the better the computation of the power-law distribution (Walsh and Wat-terson, 1993).

Truncation and censoring affect the computa-tion of the fractal distribution for fractures (Bon-net et al., 2001) and cones (Mazzarini, 2004). In order to fi t the data for a scale range probably not affected by these effects, at least 150–200 objects (cones in this case) must be analyzed (Bonnet et al., 2001; Bour et al., 2002).

The distribution of vents in the Afar Depres-sion was also analyzed in terms of vent

separation. Vent separation (or spacing) is ana-lyzed by computing the average minimum dis-tance between vents. The coeffi cient of varia-tion CV (Gillespie et al., 1999, and references therein) for the distribution of vent separation describes the degree of vent clustering. CV > 1 indicates clustering of vents, CV = 1 indicates a random or Poisson distribution of vents, and CV < 1 indicates anticlustering (a homoge-neous distribution) of vents. CV is defi ned as:

CV

S

m= , (2)

where S is the standard deviation and m is the mean.

In order to analyze the density of vents tak-ing into account their spatial distribution, the vent closeness (VC) method was introduced. This method computes the number of vents within a radius r centered on each vent of the data set; three different search radii were used. The resulting vent density for each data set is the average of the measures relative to all the vents in the data set.

RESULTS

As a whole, the vents in the Afar Depression have a very similar separation (spacing), with an average of 1.24 km in the 0.91–1.30 km range (Table 2). Vents in the Danakil block (set DB-a) show the widest spacing (~1.30 km). Data set DB-na in the Danakil block has the closest

vent spacing (1.14 km). The vent spacing dis-tribution can be described by the coeffi cient of variation, CV. Data sets DB-na (CV = 0.88) and DB-a (CV = 0.77) have an anticlustered (homo-geneous) distribution of vent spacing, whereas the remaining data sets show CV values >1, indicating a clustered distribution of vent spac-ing (Table 2). The higher the CV value, the more clustered the distribution.

Self-similar clustering of vents is described by the correlation exponent D (the higher the correlation exponent D the more homogeneous the distribution i.e., anti-clustered; e.g., Bonnet et al., 2001).

Data sets show different degrees of cluster-ing (Table 3), with D = 1.42 ± 0.02 for the Afar vents as a whole. Data sets NA (D = 1.34 ± 0.02) and SA (D = 1.19 ± 0.04) show the highest self-similar clustering of cones. Data sets DB-a (D = 1.69 ± 0.02), CA-1 (D = 1.52 ± 0.02), and DB-na (D = 1.50 ± 0.01) show low self-similar clustering. The D exponent for the CA data set is very similar to that for the Afar vents as a whole (1.43 ± 0.02).

Overall, the vents in the Afar Depression show a well-established fractal behavior over more than one order of magnitude (1.2–23 km); the computed upper cutoff is 23.4 ± 2.0 km. Three data sets (CA, DB-na, and SA) have an upper cutoff of ~23 km (Table 3). Data sets DB-a and CA-1 have upper cutoff values of 12.5 ± 1.6 km and 11.5 ± 0.8, respectively. The NA data set has an upper cutoff of 14.2 ± 2.3 km.

The vents closeness (VC) density was com-puted using 5 km, 2.5 km, and 1.4 km search radii. The smallest radius (1.4 km) was used because it is close to the maximum computed spacing of vents (1.30 km) (Fig. 6; Table 2). As a whole, VC ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 vents km–2 (Table 4). Density does not show large variations; the highest values (0.3) derive from the Afar, CA, and NA data sets using a search radius of 1.4 km, whereas the lowest values (0.1) were computed using a search radius of 5 km (Table 4).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The vents in the Afar Depression clearly show self-similar clustering (D = 1.42 ± 0.02) in the 1.2–23.4 km range, with an upper cutoff (Uco) of ~23 km (23.4 ± 2.0). The computed correlation exponent for the Afar vents is sim-ilar to that of vents along the northern Main Ethiopian Rift (Fig. 8). The Main Ethiopian Rift vents show self-similar clustering (D = 1.41 ± 0.02) and Uco of ~27 km; the Uco value matches well the crustal thickness of the north-ern Main Ethiopian Rift (Mazzarini, 2004). The difference (~5 km) in the Ucos of the Afar Depression and the northern Main Ethiopian

Figure 7. Pixel values (DN) of basaltic vents (DB-1 and DB-2) and silicic volcanics (see text) sampled in a Landsat ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper) satellite image.

Page 9: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Mazzarini

160 Geosphere, June 2007

Rift may thus refl ect different degrees of crustal stretching (e.g., Hayward and Ebinger, 1996). Moreover, the observed Uco value for the Afar Depression fi ts well with the crustal thickness of ~25 km derived from geophysical data from the region.

Most of the analyzed data sets show similar Uco values (DB-na, CA, and SA); the average of 23.2 ± 0.5 km clearly matches the Uco value computed for the Afar vents (23.4 ± 2.0 km). The NA data set, from northern Afar where large volcanoes occur, has a Uco value of 14.2 ± 2.3 km that closely matches the crustal thick-ness of the area based on seismic refraction data (e.g., Prodehl et al., 1997). Data set DB-a also has a low Uco value (12.5 ± 1.6 km) along an E-W volcanic range close to Assab in the Danakil block (Fig. 6). The CA-1 data set in the Manda Hararao–Goba’ad rifts shows the lowest Uco value (11.5 ± 0.8 km). The low Uco value for the Manda Hararo–Goba’ad rifts (CA-1) is consis-tent with data (seismic, synthetic aperture radar interferograms, and fi eld surveys) collected in September–October 2005 in the northwestern termination of the Manda Hararo rift during the formation of eruptive fi ssures and vents, and during the emplacement of a dike extending from 2 to ~9 km in depth (Wright et al., 2006), suggesting a brittle crust thickness of ~10 km.

The inferred Uco values for the Afar Depres-sion can be considered proxy measures of

different degrees of stretching in an extending continental crust; extension is mainly localized in areas where the propagation of the spreading ridge (the Red Sea for the NA data set and the Gulf of Aden for the CA-1 data set) (Manighetti et al., 1998) leads to strain localization.

Global plate reconstruction based on geo-detic, geophysical, and geological data (Chu and Gordon, 1999; Sella et al., 2002; Kreemer et al., 2003; Fernandes et al., 2004) yields an average spreading rate of 1.6–7 mm yr–1 for the East African Rift system. Strain rates in the East African Rift system vary from south to north, and an average strain rate of 5–7 mm yr–1 can be assumed in the Afar. Using these values as proxy for the strain rate in the Afar Depression, and assuming pure shear deformation, a crustal neck-ing of ~5 km is accomplished in ~1–3 m.y. The basaltic vents used to determine the thickness of the crust in the Afar region are younger than 2 Ma, and most are Holocene age (Manighetti et al., 1998; Lahitte et al., 2003a, 2003b; Kidane et al., 2003); the vents thus formed just after or during the late stages of crustal extension. The basaltic magma thus rose from deep crustal or subcrustal reservoirs through a thinned crust to the surface, giving rise to monogenetic vents and forming volcanic fi elds. In the Afar Depres-sion, the spatial distribution of vents imaged the heterogeneous thickness of the crust (see the analyzed data sets, Table 3), thereby confi rming

that crustal extension in the Afar region is ongo-ing and not uniform. The local-scale distribution of vents can thus provide insight into localized crustal extension.

The exposure and tectonic setting of the Afar Depression make it an ideal location for investigating the link between vent distribution (self-similar clustering) and crustal thickness. In general, several factors (e.g., changes in strain rate) may change the style and chemistry of vol-canism. In the Afar region, for example, basaltic activity marks periods of high extensional strain (e.g., Lahitte et al., 2003a). The occurrence of monogenetic basaltic volcanism requires a channeling of magma from deep reservoirs to the surface without formation of intracrustal

TABLE 2. STATISTICS OF VENT SEPARATION FOR THE ANALYZED DATA SETS

rafA AS AC 1-AC AN a-BD an-BD

Mean (km) 1.14 1.30 1.27 1.24 1.23 1.17 1.24

Standard deviation (km) 1.01 1.00 1.46 1.32 1.37 1.41 1.30

Maximum (km) 5.22 6.28 14.03 8.79 18.40 10.20 18.40

Minimum (km) 0.13 0.19 0.12 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.01

CV 0.88 0.77 1.16 1.07 1.10 1.20 1.05 Note: DB-na—Danakil block north of Assab; DB-a—Assab area; NA—North Afar; CA-1—Central Afar (Manda Hararo and Goba’ad rifts); CA— Manda Inakir, Asal, Ghoubbet rifts and the western border of the Danakil block); SA—South Afar (junction between Afar and the Main Ethiopian Rift); CV—coefficient of variation.

TABLE 3. VENT SELF-SIMILAR CLUSTERING IN AFAR

rafA AS AC 1-AC AN a-BD an-BD

Vent number 221 227 349 203 591 134 1725

D 1.50 ± 0.01 1.69 ± 0.02 1.34 ± 0.02 1.52 ± 0.02 1.43 ± 0.02 1.19 ± 0.04 1.42 ± 0.02

01 x 3 c –7 7 x 10–8 8 x 10–7 3 x 10–7 2 x 10–7 5 x 10–6 7 x 10–7

Lower cutoff (km) 1.2 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.8 1.2 ± 0.5

Upper cutoff (km) 23.1 ± 1.4 12.5 ± 1.6 14.2 ± 2.3 11.5 ± 0.8 23.5 ± 2.5 22.8 ± 1.5 23.4 ± 2.0

R2 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 Note: DB-na—Danakil block north of Assab; DB-a—Assab area; NA—North Afar; CA-1—Central Afar (Manda Hararo and Goba’ad rifts); CA— Manda Inakir, Asal, Ghoubbet rifts and the western border of the Danakil block); SA—South Afar (junction between Afar and the Main Ethiopian Rift). D— correlation exponent; c—normalization coefficient; R2—correlation coefficient.

TABLE 4. MEASUREMENTS OF VENT DENSITY

Data sets Vent closeness (vent/km2)

r = 5* r = 2.5 r = 1.4 Afar 0.2 0.2 0.3 DB-na 0.1 0.2 0.2 DB-a 0.2 0.2 0.2 NA 0.1 0.2 0.3 CA-1 0.2 0.2 0.2 CA 0.2 0.2 0.3 SA 0.2 0.2 0.2 *r = search radius in km.

Page 10: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Vent in Afar

Geosphere, June 2007 161

magma chambers, regardless of the brittle layer thickness. The style of volcanism may change through time, generating more evolved magma and fi ssure magmatism and determining the for-mation of central volcanoes (e.g., Lahitte et al., 2003a). In this case the distribution of volcanic vents may be controlled by strain rate and brittle and/or ductile layering of the crust.

More data sets on the distribution of vents in basaltic volcanic fi elds within extensional or contractional continental tectonic settings are required to better defi ne the link between crustal thickness and the upper vent distribution cutoff value. Once this hypothesis is confi rmed by robust statistics, the distribution of basaltic vents can be used as a proxy measure of crustal and/or lithospheric thickness in large and remote areas of the Earth or on planets with evidence of vol-canic activity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank G. Corti and two anonymous review-ers for comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

Ackermann, R.V., and Schlische, R.W., 1997, Anticlus-tering of small normal faults around larger faults:

Geology, v. 25, p. 1127–1130, doi: 10.1130/0091–7613(1997)025<1127:AOSNFA>2.3.CO;2.

Ackermann, R.V., Schlinsche, R.W., and Withack, M.O., 2001, The geometric and statistical evolution of normal fault systems: An experimental study of the effects of mechanical layer thickness on scaling laws: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 23, p. 1803–1819, doi: 10.1016/S0191–8141(01)00028–1.

Alaniz-Alvarez, S.A., Nieto-Samaniego, A.F., and Fer-rari, L., 1998, Effect of strain rate in the distribu-tion of monogenetic and polygenetic volcanism in the Transmexican volcanic belt: Geology, v. 26, p. 591–594, doi: 10.1130/0091–7613(1998)026<0591:EOSRIT>2.3.CO;2.

Barberi, F., and Varet, J., 1977, Volcanism of Afar: Small-scale plate tectonic implications: Geological Society of Amer-ica Bulletin, v. 88, p. 1251–1266, doi: 10.1130/0016–7606(1977)88<1251:VOASPT>2.0.CO;2.

Benoit, M.H., Nyblade, A.A., and VanDecar, J.C., 2006, Upper mantle P-wave speed variations beneath Ethio-pia and the origin of the Afar hotspot: Geology, v. 34, p. 329–332, doi: 10.1130/G22281.1.

Berckhemer, H., Baier, B., Bartlesen, H., Behle, A., Burkhardt, H., Gebrande, H., Markris, J., Menzel, H., Miller, H., and Vees, R., 1975, Deep seismic soundings in the Afar region and on the highland of Ethiopia, in Pilger, A., and Rosler, A., eds., Afar Depression of Ethiopia: Stuttgart, Germany, E. Schweizerbart, p. 89–107.

Beyene, A., and Abdelsalam, M.G., 2005, Tectonics of the Afar Depression: A review and synthesis: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 41, p. 41–59, doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.03.003.

Bonini, M., Corti, G., Innocenti, F., Manetti, P., Mazzarini, F., Abebe, T., and Pecskay, Z., 2005, Evolution of the Main Ethiopian Rift in the frame of Afar and Kenya rifts propagation: Tectonics, v. 24, p. TC1007, doi: 10.1029/2004TC001680.

Bonnet, E., Bour, O., Odling, N.E., Davy, P., Main, I., Cowie, P., and Berkowitz, B., 2001, Scaling of fracture

systems in geological media: Reviews of Geophysics, v. 39, p. 347–383, doi: 10.1029/1999RG000074.

Bosworth, W., Huchon, P., and McClay, K., 2005, The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Basins: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 43, p. 334–378, doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.020.

Bour, O., and Davy, P., 1999, Clustering and size distribu-tion of fault patterns: Theory and measurements: Geo-physical Research Letters, v. 26, p. 2001–2004, doi: 10.1029/1999GL900419.

Bour, O., Philippe Davy, P., Darcel, C., and Odling, N., 2002, A statistical scaling model for fracture network geometry, with validation on a multiscale mapping of a joint network (Hornelen Basin, Norway): Jour-nal of Geophysical Research, v. 107, p. 2113, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000176.

Braile, L.W., Keller, G.R., Wendlandt, R.F., Morgan, P., and Khan, M.A., 1995, The East African Rift system, in Olsen, K.H., ed., Continental rifts: Evolution, struc-ture, tectonics: New York, Elsevier, Developments in Geotectonics, v. 25, p. 213–231.

Cannat, M., 1996, How thick is the magmatic crust at slow spread-ing oceanic ridges?: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 2847–2857, doi: 10.1029/95JB03116.

Canon-Tapia, E., and Walker, G.P.L., 2004, Global aspects of volcanism: the perspectives of “plate tectonics” and “volcanic systems”: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 66, p. 163–182, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2003.11.001.

Chorowicz, J., 2005, The East African Rift System: Jour-nal of African Earth Sciences, v. 43, p. 379–410, doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.019.

Chu, D., and Gordon, R.G., 1999, Evidence for motion between Nubia and Somalia along the Southwest Indian Ridge: Nature, v. 398, p. 64–67, doi: 10.1038/18014.

CNR-CNRS-Afar team, 1973, Geology of northern Afar (Ethiopia): Revue de Geographie Physique et de Geol-ogie Dynamique, v. 2, p. 343–390.

Connor, C.B., 1990, Cinder cone clustering: Journal of Geo-physical Research, v. 95, p. 19,395–19,405.

Connor, C.B., and Conway, F.M., 2000, Basaltic volcanic fi elds, in Sigurdsson, H., ed., Encyclopedia of volca-noes: New York, Academic Press, p. 331–343.

Connor, C.B., Condit, C.D., Crumpler, L.S., and Aubele, J.C., 1992, Evidence of regional structural control on vent distribution: Springerville volcanic fi eld, Arizona: Jour-nal of Geophysical Research, v. 97, p. 12,349–12,359.

Darcel, C., Bour, O., Davy, P., and de Dreuzy, J.R., 2003, Con-nectivity properties of two-dimensional fracture networks with stochastic fractal correlation: Water Resources Research, v. 39, p. 1272, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001628.

Davy, P., 1993, On the frequency-length distribution of the San Andreas fault system: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 98, p. 12,141–12,151.

Dugda, M.T., Nyblade, A.A., Julia, J., Langston, C.A., Ammon, C.J., and Simiyu, S., 2005, Crustal structure in Ethiopia and Kenya from receiver function analy-sis: Implications for rift development in eastern Africa: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 110, p. B01303, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003065.

Ebinger, C.J., and Hayward, N.J., 1996, Soft plates and hot spots: Views from Afar: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 21,859–21,876, doi: 10.1029/96JB02118.

Ebinger, C.J., and Sleep, N.H., 1998, Cenozoic magma-tism in central and east Africa resulting from impact of one large plume: Nature, v. 395, p. 788–791, doi: 10.1038/27417.

Fernandes, R.M.S., Ambrosius, B.A.C., Noomen, R., Bastos, L., Combrinck, L., Miranda, J.M., and Spakman, W., 2004, Angular velocities of Nubia and Somalia from continuous GPS data: Implications on present-day rel-ative kinematics: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 222, p. 197–208, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.02.008.

Gass, I.G., 1970, The evolution of volcanism in the junction area of the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and Ethiopian rifts: Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions, ser. A, v. 267, p. 369–382, doi: 10.1098/rsta.1970.0042.

Gillespie, P.A., Johnston, J.D., Loriga, M.A., McCaffrey, K.J.W., Walsh, J.J., and Watterson, J., 1999, Infl u-ence of layering on vein systematics in line samples, in McCaffrey, K.J.W., et al., eds., Fractures, fl uid fl ow and mineralization: Geological Society [London] Spe-cial Publication 155, p. 35–56.

Figure 8. Plot of log(r) versus log(C[r]) for the Afar (black diamonds) and Main Ethiopian Rift (MER) vents (red dots). Black crosses are the local slope for the Afar vent. Vertical dashed black lines mark the upper and lower cutoffs for the Afar vents. Vertical dashed red lines mark the upper and lower cutoffs for the MER vents. MER data are from Mazzarini (2004). The slope of the curves is the correlation exponent (D). The Afar Depression and the MER have nearly equal slopes. The MER upper cutoff is higher than the Afar upper cutoff (see text).

Page 11: Vent distribution and crustal thickness in stretched ... · PDF filetal crust is here used as a proxy for crustal thickness. Basaltic monogenetic vents show self-similar clustering

Mazzarini

162 Geosphere, June 2007

Goward, S.N., Masek, J.G., Darrel, L., Williams, D.L., Irons, J.R., and Thompson, R.J., 2001, The Landsat 7 mis-sion: Terrestrial research and applications for the 21st century: Remote Sensing of the Environment, v. 78, p. 3–12, doi: 10.1016/S0034–4257(01)00262–0.

Gross, M.R., Fischer, M.P., Engelder, T., and Greenfi eld, R.J., 1995, Factors controlling joint spacing in interbedded sedimentary rocks: Integrating numerical models with fi eld observations from the Monterey Formation, USA, in Ameen, M.S., ed., Fractography: Fracture topogra-phy as a tool in fracture mechanics and stress analysis: Geological Society [London] Special Publication 92, p. 215–233.

Hayward, N.J., and Ebinger, C.J., 1996, Variations in the along-axis segmentation of the Afar Rift system: Tec-tonics, v. 15, p. 244–257, doi: 10.1029/95TC02292.

Hofstetter, R., and Beyth, M., 2003, The Afar Depression interpretation of the 1960–2000 earthquakes: Geo-physical Journal International, v. 155, p. 715–732, doi: 10.1046/j.1365–246X.2003.02080.x.

Ito, G., and Martel, J., 2002, Focusing of magma in the upper mantle through dike interaction: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 107, p. 2223, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000251.

Janza, F.J., Blue, H.M., and Johnston, J.E., eds., 1975, Manual of remote sensing: Theory, instruments and techniques: Volume I: Bethesda, Maryland, American Society of Photogrammetry, 867 p.

Kidane, T., Courtillot, V., Manighetti, I., Audin, L., Lahitte, P., Quidelleur, X., Gillot, P.-Y., Gallet, Y., Carlut, J., and Haile, T., 2003, New paleomagnetic and geochro-nologic results from Ethiopian Afar: Block rotations linked to rift overlap and propagation and determi-nation of a ~2 Ma reference pole for stable Africa: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108, p. 2102, doi: 10.1029/2001JB000645.

Kreemer, C., Holt, W.E., and Haines, J., 2003, An inte-grated global model of present day plate motions and plate boundary deformations: Geophysical Journal International, v. 154, p. 8–34, doi: 10.1046/j.1365–246X.2003.01917.x.

Lahitte, P., Gillot, P.-Y., Kidane, T., Courtillot, V., and Abebe, B., 2003a, New age constraints on the timing of volcanism in central Afar, in the presence of propa-gating rifts: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108, p. 2123, doi: 10.1029/2001JB001689.

Lahitte, P., Gillot, P.-Y., and Courtillot, V., 2003b, Silicic central volcanoes as precursors to rift propagation: The Afar case: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 207, p. 103–116, doi: 10.1016/S0012–821X(02)01130–5.

Lutz, T.M., 1986, An analysis of the orientation of large scale crustal structures: A statistical approach based on areal distribution of pointlike features: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 91, p. 421–434.

Makris, J., and Ginzburg, A., 1987, The Afar Depression: Transition between continental rifting and sea fl oor spreading: Tectonophysics, v. 141, p. 199–214, doi: 10.1016/0040–1951(87)90186–7.

Mandelbrot, B.B., 1982, The fractal geometry of nature: New York, W.H. Freeman, p. 468.

Manighetti, I., Tapponnier, P., Gillot, P.Y., Jacques, E., Cour-tillot, V., Armijo, R., Ruegg, J.C., and King, G., 1998, Propagation of rifting along the Arabia-Somalia plate boundary Into Afar: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 103, p. 4947–4974, doi: 10.1029/97JB02758.

Margolin, G., Berkowitz, B., and Scher, H., 1998, Structure, fl ow, and generalized conductivity scaling in fracture networks: Water Resources Research, v. 34, p. 2103–2121, doi: 10.1029/98WR01648.

Marrett, R., Ortega, O.J., and Kelsey, C.M., 1999, Extent of power-law scaling for natural fractures in rock: Geology, v. 27, p. 799–802, doi: 10.1130/0091–7613(1999)027<0799:EOPLSF>2.3.CO;2.

Mazzarini, F., 2004, Volcanic vent self-similar clustering and crustal thickness in the northern Main Ethiopian Rift: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 31, p. L04604, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018574.

Mazzarini, F., and D’Orazio, M., 2003, Spatial distribution of cones and satellite-detected lineaments in the Pali Aike Volcanic Field (southernmost Patagonia): Insights into the tectonic setting of a Neogene rift system: Jour-nal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 125, p. 291–305, doi: 10.1016/S0377–0273(03)00120–3.

Mazzarini, F., Corti, G., Manetti, P., and Innocenti, F., 2004, Strain rate bimodal volcanism in the continental rift: Debre Zeyt volcanic fi eld, northern MER, Ethiopia: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 39, p. 415–420, doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.025.

Merla, G., Abbate, E., Azzaroli, A., Bruni, P., Canuti, P., Mazzuoli, M., Sagri, M., and Sacconi, P., 1979, A geological map of Ethiopia and Somalia (1973) at 1:2.000.000 scale: Florence, Italy, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, p. 1–95.

Mohr, P., 1983, The Morton-Black hypothesis for the thin-ning of continental crust—Revisited in western Afar: Tectonophysics, v. 94, p. 509–528, doi: 10.1016/0040–1951(83)90032-X.

Mohr, P.A., and Wood, C.A., 1976, Volcano spacings and lithospheric attenuation in the Eastern Rift of Africa: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 33, p. 126–144, doi: 10.1016/0012–821X(76)90166–7.

Nakamura, K., 1977, Volcanoes as possible indicators of tectonic stress: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 2, p. 1–16, doi: 10.1016/0377–0273(77)90012–9.

Nicolas, A., Boudier, F., and Ildefonse, B., 1994, Dike pat-terns in diapirs beneath oceanic ridges: Constraints from volcanological and geochemical investigations, in Ryan, M.P., ed., Magmatic system: San Diego, Cali-fornia, Academic Press, p. 77–95.

Ouillon, G., Castaing, C., and Sornette, D., 1996, Hierarchical geometry of faulting: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 5477–5487, doi: 10.1029/95JB02242.

Pacheco, J.F., Scholz, C.H., and Sikes, L.R., 1992, Change in the frequency-size relationship from small to large earth-quakes: Nature, v. 355, p. 71–73, doi: 10.1038/355071a0.

Pelletier, J.D., 1999, Statistical self-similarity of magmatism and volcanism: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 104, p. 15,425–15,438, doi: 10.1029/1999JB900109.

Petford, N., Cruden, A.R., McCaffrey, K.J.W., and Vigner-esse, J.L., 2000, Granite magma formation, transport and emplacement in the Earth’s crust: Nature, v. 408, p. 669–673, doi: 10.1038/35047000.

Prodehl, C., and Mechie, J., 1991, Crustal thinning in rela-tionships to the evolution of the Afro-Arabian rift system—A review of seismic refraction data: Tecto-nophysics, v. 198, p. 311–327, doi: 10.1016/0040–1951(91)90158-O.

Prodehl, C., Fuchs, K., and Mechie, J., 1997, Seismic-refrac-tion studies of the Afro–Arabian rift system––A brief review: Tectonophysics, v. 278, p. 1–13, doi: 10.1016/S0040–1951(97)00091–7.

Redfi eld, T.F., Wheeler, W.H., and Often, M., 2003, A kine-matic model for the development of the Afar Depres-sion and its paleogeographic implications: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 216, p. 383–398, doi: 10.1016/S0012–821X(03)00488–6.

Renshaw, C.E., 1999, Connectivity of joints networks with power-law length distributions: Water Resources Research, v. 35, p. 2661–2670, doi: 10.1029/1999WR900170.

Roberts, S., Sanderson, D.J., and Gumiel, P., 1998, Fractal analysis of Sn-W mineralization from Central Iberia: Insights into the role of fracture connectivity in the for-mation of an ore deposit: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, v. 93, p. 360–365.

Roberts, S., Sanderson, D.J., and Gumiel, P., 1999, Fractal analysis and percolation properties of veins, in McCaf-frey, K.J.W., et al., eds., Fractures, fl uid fl ow and min-eralization: Geological Society [London] Special Pub-lication 155, p. 7–16.

Rogers, N., Macdonald, R., Fitton, J.G., George, R., Smith, M., and Barreiro, B., 2000, Two mantle plumes beneath the East African Rift system: Sr, Nd and Pb isotope evidence from Kenya Rift Basalts: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 176, p. 387–400, doi: 10.1016/S0012–821X(00)00012–1.

Rosendahl, B.L., 1987, Architecture of continental rifts with special reference to East Africa: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 15, p. 445–503, doi: 10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.002305.

Rubin, A.M., 1993, Dikes vs. diapirs in viscoelastic rock: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 119, p. 641–659, doi: 10.1016/0012–821X(93)90069-L.

Sella, G., Dixon, T.H., and Mao, A., 2002, REVEL: A model for recent plate velocities from space geodesy:

Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 107, doi: 10.1029/2000JB000033.

Stauffer, D., and Aharony, A., 1992, Introduction in percola-tion theory (second edition): Philadelphia, Pennsylva-nia, Taylor and Francis, p. 190.

Takada, A., 1994a, The infl uence of regional stress and mag-matic input on styles of monogenetic and polygenetic volcanism: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 99, p. 13,563–13,573, doi: 10.1029/94JB00494.

Takada, A., 1994b, Development of subvolcanic structure by the interaction of liquid-fi lled cracks: Journal of Vol-canology and Geothermal Research, v. 61, p. 207–224, doi: 10.1016/0377–0273(94)90004–3.

Tefera, M., Chernet, T., and Haro, W., 1996, Explanation of the geological map of Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, Ethio-pian Institute of Geological Surveys, p. 3–79.

ten Brink, U., 1991, Volcano spacing and plate rigidity: Geology, v. 19, p. 397–400, doi: 10.1130/0091–7613(1991)019<0397:VSAPR>2.3.CO;2.

Tesfaye, S., Harding, J.D., and Kusky, T.M., 2003, Early continental breakup boundary and migration of the Afar triple junction, Ethiopia: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 115, p. 1053–1067.

Tibaldi, A., 1995, Morphology of pyroclastic cones and tectonics: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 100, p. 24,521–24,535, doi: 10.1029/95JB02250.

Tiberi, C., Ebinger, C., Ballu, V., Stuart, G., and Oluma, B., 2005, Inverse models of gravity data from the Red Sea–Aden–East African rifts triple junction zone: Geo-physical Journal International, v. 163, p. 775–787, doi: 10.1111/j.1365–246X.2005.02736.x.

van Vyk de Vries, B., and Merle, O., 1996, The effect of vol-canic constructs on rift fault patterns: Geology, v. 24, p. 643–646.

Vogt, P.R., 1974, Volcano spacing, fractures, and thickness of the lithosphere: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 21, p. 235–252, doi: 10.1016/0012–821X(74)90159–9.

Vrabel, J., 1996, Multispectral imagery band sharpening study: Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 62, p. 1075–1083.

Wadge, G., and Cross, A., 1988, Quantitative methods for detecting aligned points: An application to the volca-nic vents of the Michoacan-Guanajutato volcanic fi eld, Mexico: Geology, v. 16, p. 815–818, doi: 10.1130/0091–7613(1988)016<0815:QMFDAP>2.3.CO;2.

Walsh, J.J., and Watterson, J., 1993, Fractal analysis of frac-ture pattern using the standard box-counting technique: Valid and invalid methodologies: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 15, p. 1509–1512, doi: 10.1016/0191–8141(93)90010–8.

Woldetinsae, G., and Gotze, H.-J., 2005, Gravity fi eld and isostatic state of Ethiopia and its adjacent areas: Jour-nal of African Earth Sciences, v. 41, p. 103–117, doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.02.004.

Wright, T.J., Ebinger, C., Biggs, J., Ayele, A., Gesahegn, Y., Keir, D., and Stork, A., 2006, Magma-maintained rift segmentation at continental rupture in the 2005 Afar dyking episode: Nature, v. 442, p. 291–294, doi: 10.1038/nature04978, doi: 10.1038/nature04978.

Wu, H., and Pollard, D.D., 1995, An experimental study of the relationships between joint spacing and layer thick-ness: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 17, p. 887–905, doi: 10.1016/0191–8141(94)00099-L.

Zanettin, B., 1993, On the evolution of the Ethiopian volca-nic province, in Abbate, E., et al., eds., Geology and mineral resources of Somalia and surrounding regions: Istituto Agronomico per L’Oltremare, Firenze, Relazi-oni e Monografi e Agrarie Subtropicali e Tropicali, Nuova Serie, v. 113, p. 279–310.

Zanettin, B., Justin-Visentin, E., and Piccirillo, E.M., 1978, Volcanic succession, tectonics and magmatology in central Ethiopia: Atti Memorie Accademia Patavina Scienze Lettere Arti, v. 90, p. 5–19.

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED 28 SEPTEMBER 2006REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED 21 FEBRUARY 2007MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 7 MARCH 2007