vapor-liquid equilibrium (vle) at low pressures chapter 8
TRANSCRIPT
Why study VLE?
Many chemical and environmental processes involve vapor-liquid equilibria Drying Distillation Evaporation
N2 + 3 H2 ⇋ 2NH3
Liquid Ammonia
3 moles H2
1 mole N2
Recycled Product Ammonia and unreacted feed
ChillerCondenses most of the ammonia
Separator
Reactor partially converts H2 and N2
to NH3
Bleed Stream
~15% conversion
Consider the ammonia production process discussed in Chapter 1
Controlled by VLE
+ N2 and H2
NH3 vapor+ N2 and H2
Most of what we’ve discussed so far in the course is VLE
Raoult’s law is a vapor-liquid equilibrium estimating equation
Henry’s law is vapor-liquid equilibrium estimating equation
The biggest use of VLE analysis is in distillation Check out the great picture in the text
book – page 160 Distillation is separation by boiling point
Some standard conventions used in VLE
The lowest-boiling component (most volatile) is usually called species a.
The next lowest is species b etc. Tables are arranged similarly
Data from Table 8.1Boiling Temp
Mole Fraction Acetone in Liquid
Mole Fraction Acetone in Vapor
100 0 0
74.8 0.05 0.6381
68.53 0.1 0.7301
65.26 0.15 0.7716
63.59 0.2 0.7916
61.87 0.3 0.8124
60.75 0.4 0.8269
59.95 0.5 0.8387
59.12 0.6 0.8532
58.29 0.7 0.8712
57.49 0.8 0.895
56.68 0.9 0.9335
56.3 0.95 0.9627
56.15 1 1
This data is used in examples 8.1 to 8.3, and is plotted on the next slide
Acetone-Water Composition
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Acetone fraction in liquid
Ace
ton
e fr
acti
on
in
gas
Lowest boiling point component
If all we ever dealt with were binary systems, and if tables like the one used to create this figure were available for all combinations of species, we wouldn’t need VLE correlations
Equilibrium Curve
Reference Curve
For Multispecies systems, there is no simple graph we can make
The K factor can be used to help solve this problem
Relative volatility is an additional approach
i
ii x
yK
ab
ba
xy
xy
K
K
species volatileLess
species volatileMore
Volatility Measures
0.1
1
10
100
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole Fraction in the Liquid Phase of Acetone
Rel
ativ
e vo
lati
lity
an
d "
K"
fact
ors
Relative Volatility,
K, acetone
K, water
If is greater than 1.5 to 2 over the whole range of composition, then distillation is almost always the cheapest separation technique
Mathematical Treatment of Low-Pressure VLE
The tables and graphs we’ve just looked at are easy to interpret
It would be nice if we could calculate values, instead of reading them off graphs
Our starting point is that the fugacity of the gas phase equals the fugacity of the liquid phase
)2()1(ii ff
0)2()2(0)1()1(iiiiii fxfy
For gases we usually choose the total pressure as the standard fugacity P
For liquids we usually choose the pure component partial pressure as the standard fugacity
0iP
For ideal gases the activity coefficient is one1
0)2(
ii
iii Px
Py
The activity coefficient of the liquid phase
0)2(
ii
iii Px
Py
In example 8.2, we use this equation to find the activity coeffients for water and for acetone at a number of concentrations
Partial pressure of the gas
Example 8.2
0acetoneacetone
Totalacetoneacetone Px
Py
0waterwater
Totalwaterwater Px
Py
The pure component vapor pressures are a function of temperature, and can be calculated from the Antoine equation at the appropriate boiling points.
Calculated activity coefficients
1
10
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction acetone in the liquid phase
acti
vity
co
effi
cien
t
acetone
water
Raoult’s Law
0ii
ii Px
Py If we rearrange this
equation, we find…
0iiii PxPy
Which is the same as Raoult’s law, except for the activity coefficient. Raoult’s law applies to ideal solutions, where the activity coefficient is one.
The acetone water system is not ideal, since the calculated activity coefficients are not one!!
How much would we be off if we assumed ideal solution behavior for acetone?
At 1 atm andXacetone=0.05
Experimental values from Table 8.1
Calculated values using =1
Equilibrium boiling temperature
74.8 96.4
Mole fraction acetone in the vapor phase
0.6381 0.1656The calculational details are in Example 8.3
The Four most common types of Low Pressure VLE
Ideal Solution Behavior Positive Deviations from Ideal
Solution Behavior Negative Deviations from Ideal
Solution Behavior Two-Liquid Phase --Heteroazeotropes
1
1
1
Ideal Solution Behavior – Type I behaviorThe activity coefficient of both species is one at all concentrations – Figure 8.7b
Consider a benzene-toluene system
The two species are very similar chemically, and behave as an ideal solution
Benzene has the lower boiling, and therefore the higher vapor pressure Mole fraction of benzene
in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Act
ivit
y C
oeffi
cient,
0
.1 1
.0 1
0
BenzeneToluene=1
At any P and T
Ideal Solution Behavior Since the activity
coefficients of both species is one, they both follow Raoult’s law
Mole fraction of benzene in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0iiii PxPy
Pre
ssure
, to
rr
0 4
00
8
00
1
20
00iii PxP
1
1
Ideal Solution Behavior Figure 8.7a
Mole fraction of benzene in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0iiii PxPy
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
90
C
0 4
00
8
00
1
20
0
0iii PxP
torrxP BenzeneBenzene 1021
torrxP TolueneToluene 074
PBenzene
PToluene
PTotal
TolueneBenzeneTotal PPP
1
Ideal Solution BehaviorFigure 8.7c For an ideal
solution, the mole fraction of the most volatile component, is always higher in the gas than in the liquid
Mole fraction of benzene in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f benze
ne
in t
he liq
uid
phase
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Equilibrium curve
Reference curve
Not to Scale
1
Ideal Solution BehaviorFigure 8.7 d
If we heat a mixture of benzene and toluene, the temperature where it starts to boil is called the bubble point
The combined partial pressures equal 1 atm Mole fraction of benzene
in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tem
pera
ture
, C
75
8
5 9
5 1
05
1
15
Not to Scale
Bubble Point
1
Ideal Solution BehaviorFigure 8.7 d
If we cool a mixture of benzene and toluene vapor, the temperature where it starts to condense is called the dew point
The combined partial pressures equal 1 atm Mole fraction of benzene
in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tem
pera
ture
, C
75
8
5 9
5 1
05
1
15
Not to Scale
Bubble Point
Dew Point
1
Mole fraction of benzene in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
Tem
pera
ture
, C
75
8
5 9
5 1
05
1
15
Bubble Point
Dew Point
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Temperature at the bubble point
Vapor Phase composition at the bubble point
Heat a liquid mixture until it starts to boil
Liquid Phase composition at the dew point
Now let’s look at non-ideal solution behavior
First let’s attack positive deviations from ideal solution behavior (Type II behavior)
The activity coefficients of both (or all) species is greater than one.
The acetone water system is an example of this behavior
So is the isopropanol-water system shown in Figure 8.8
Type II behavior of activity coefficients – always greater than 1
Notice that the behavior of each species approaches ideal (=1) as it’s concentration increases
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Act
ivit
y C
oeffi
cient,
1 1
0 1
5 Not to ScaleP=1 atm
isopropanol
water
Pure isopropanol
Pure waterFigure 8.8 b
Type II behavior
Activity coefficients greater than 1 mean that the partial pressure of the vapor is greater than that predicted with Raoult’s law
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
84
C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
Predicted with =1
Actual isopropanol partial pressure
1i
Type II behavior
Activity coefficients greater than 1 mean that the partial pressure of the vapor is greater than that predicted with Raoult’s law
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
84
C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
1i
Predicted with =1
Actual water partial pressure
Type II behavior
In this case (but not every type II case) the total pressure curve (at constant temperature) displays a maximum, which produces a minimum boiling azeotrope.
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
84
C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
1i
water partial pressure
isopropanol partial pressure
Total pressure
Figure 8.8 a
Type II Solution BehaviorFigure 8.8c When the total
pressure displays a maximum, the equilibrium curve crosses the reference curve
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f is
opro
panol
in t
he v
apor
phase
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Equilibrium curve
Reference curve
Not to Scale
Azeotrope
1i
Azeotropes At an azeotrope,
the liquid and vapor have the same concentration
Mole fraction of isopropanol in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f is
opro
panol in
the liq
uid
phase
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Not to Scale
Azeotrope
1i
Type II Solution Behavior At mole fractions
below the azeotrope, almost pure water, and the azeotropic composition can be distilled
At mole fractions above the azeotrope, almost pure isopropanol and the azeotropic composition can be distilled Mole fraction of isopropanol
in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tem
pera
ture
, C
75
8
0 8
5 9
0 9
5 1
00
Not to Scale
Azeotrope
Bubble Point Curve
Dew Point Curve
1i
Type II Solution Behavior
Type II solutions do not necessarily exhibit an azeotrope
For example, the acetone-water system does not
Two factors contribute to this behavior Difference in boiling point Deviation from ideal behavior
1i
Type III Behavior
for both species is less than 1 Similar to Type II – just insert
maximum for minimum etc Consider the acetone-chloroform
system
Type III behavior of activity coefficients – always less than 1
Notice that the behavior of each species approaches ideal (=1) as it’s concentration increases
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Act
ivit
y C
oeffi
cient,
0.3
0
.4 0
.6 1
.0 1
.5 Not to ScaleP=1 atm
acetone
chloroform
Pure acetone
Pure chloroform
Figure 8.9 b
Type III behavior
Activity coefficients less than 1 mean that the partial pressure of the vapor is less than that predicted with Raoult’s law
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
60
C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
Predicted with =1
Actual acetone partial pressure
1i
Type III behavior
Activity coefficients less than 1 mean that the partial pressure of the vapor is less than that predicted with Raoult’s law
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at6
0 C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
Predicted with =1
Actual chloroform partial pressure
1i
Type III behavior
In this case (but not every type III case) the total pressure curve (at constant temperature) displays a minimum, which produces a maximum boiling azeotrope.
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid or vapor phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
60
C
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Not to Scale
0iiii PxP
1i
Total pressure
Figure 8.9 a
Actual chloroform partial pressure
Actual acetone partial pressure
Type III Solution BehaviorFigure 8.9c When the total
pressure displays a minimum, the equilibrium curve crosses the reference curve
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f ace
tone iin
th
e v
apor
phase
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Equilibrium curve
Reference curve
Not to Scale
Azeotrope
1i
Azeotropes At an azeotrope,
the liquid and vapor have the same concentration
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Not to Scale
1i
Mole fraction of acetone in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f ace
tone iin
th
e v
apor
phase
Equilibrium curve
Azeotrope
Type II Solution Behavior At mole fractions
below the azeotrope, almost pure chloroform, and the azeotropic composition can be distilled
At mole fractions above the azeotrope, almost pure chloroform and the azeotropic composition can be distilled Mole fraction of acetone in the
liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tem
pera
ture
, C
50
5
5 6
0 6
5 7
0 7
5
Not to Scale
Azeotrope
Bubble Point Curve
Dew Point Curve
1i
What controls whether the activity coefficients are greater or less than one?
When >1 it indicates that the solution species are repelled by each other, or at least are more attracted to themselves than to the other species
When <1 it indicates that the solution species are more attracted to each other than to their own kind
More about azeotropes For a given degree of mutual
attraction or repulsion, an azeotrope is more likely for species with a small difference in boiling point
For pairs of compounds with the same difference in boiling point, an azeotrope is more likely for the pair whose activity coefficients deviate from one by the largest amounts
Binary azeotropes between compounds with wide differences in boiling point are rare
Most azeotropes are of the minimum boiling type (over 90%)
Type IV Behavior Two Liquid Phase --Heteroazeotropes
Type II behavior occurs when two species repel each other
For a moderately strong repulsion an azeotrope forms
If the repulsion is strong enough, the two liquids actually separate into two separate phases
For example
Consider the water and butanol system
Between 65% water and 98% water, two phases occur
At less than 65% water only a single phase exists
At greater than 98% water only a single phase occurs
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole fraction water
Water-butanol system From 0 to 65%
water one phase exists
From 98% to 100% water one phase exists
Between these values, two phases exist – one of 65% water and one of 98% water
1 phase
1 phase
2 phases
In the single phase region…
The solution exhibits Type II behavior
Mole fraction of water in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Act
ivit
y C
oeffi
cient,
1.0
2
.0 5
.0 1
0. 2
0. 3
01butanol
1
1water1
1butanol2
1water2
Type IV BehaviorPressure behavior
In the two phase region the total pressure is the sum of the pressure from each phase
However, both phases must be exposed to the gas phase
Mole fraction of water in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Pre
ssure
, to
rr –
at
90
C
0 4
00
8
00
1
20
0
Partial Pressure of n-butanol
Partial Pressure of water
Total Pressure
Type IVVapor-Liquid Equilibrium
The composition of the gas phase stays constant when two liquid phases are present
0 0
.2 0
.4 0
.6 0
.8 1
.0
Mole fraction of water in the liquid phase(s), xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Mole
fra
ctio
n o
f w
ate
r in
the
vapor
phase
Reference Line
Equilibrium Curve
Type IVBubble Points and Dew Points
Call the n-butanol rich phase L1
Call the water rich phase L2
Mole fraction of water in the liquid phase, xa
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tem
pera
ture
, C
80
9
0 1
00
1
10
1
20
1
30
Vapor Phase
L1
L2
L1 + L2
Vapor + L1
Vapor + L2
Dew Point Curve
Bubble Point Curve
Boiling is necessary for this behavior The predicted behavior
will only occur if both phases are in contact with the gas phase
Realistically this only occurs during boiling
This type of behavior is common in petroleum refining
Liquid Phase I
Liquid Phase II
Gas Phase
Steam Distillation
If we take type IV behavior to the extreme, we consider two liquids that are essentially completely immiscible
For example water and mercury In this case we are always in the two
phase region
ii PPyP Mercurywater PP 00
The total pressure is the sum of the pure component vapor pressures
Consider example 8.7 If n-butanol and water were
completely insoluable, what would the boiling point be at one atm?
What would the composition of the vapor be?
ii PPyP butanoln00
PP water
Estimate the partial pressures of each component with the Antoine Equation
TTC
BAPwater
02.227
462.165794917.7log
TP
8812.196
190.1558838.7log butanol-n
mmHg 760butanol-n waterPP
Solve for T iteratively
T=89 0C
At the boiling point of 89 C
PH20 = 0.67 atm Pn-butanol= 0.33 atm Compare these results to Figure 8.12
Remember that butanol and water actually do exhibit considerable solubility
Distillation of the Four Types of Behavior
For systems that do not have an azeotrope, distillation columns can produce practically pure products The highest vapor pressure component is
separated into the overhead component The lower vapor pressure component is
separated into the bottoms
Gas-Liquid Equilibrium – Henry’s Law
In the previous discussions, both components could exist as a pure liquid at the temperatures of interest
In other words we were interested in vapor-liquid equilibria
How can we extend this discussion to include gas-liquid equilibria, for species that do not condense
Use Henry’s Law
Our discussions so far have been about systems at low pressure
At low pressures, the gas phase obeys the ideal gas law
At higher pressures we’ll need to consider the fugacity coefficient in our calculations
At both low and moderate pressures (up to ~1/2 the critical pressure) we won’t need to adjust our liquid phase calculations
Low Pressure VLE Calculations
Graphs are great to get a general idea of how systems behave, but they aren’t very accurate
We need to develop a standard approach to calculate vapor-liquid equilibrium properties
At low pressures the fugacity coefficients are 1 – but the liquid phase activity coefficients aren’t
Estimate them using the Van Laar equation
2
2
)log(
ba
ba
xxBA
Ax 2
2
)log(
ba
ab
xAB
x
Bx
There are other estimating equations – this one is just easy to use -- the basis for the Van Laar equation is developed in chapter 9
The 6 Most Common VLE Calculations
Find the dew point, for a known temperature
Find the dew point, for a known pressure Find the bubble point for a known
temperature Find the bubble point for a known pressure Isothermal flash calculations Adiabatic flash calculations
These are all examples problems that can be formulated as equilibrium flash calculations
Flash Calculations
Liquid
Vapour
F
V
L
T, P
F can be a liquid, a gas or a two phase mixture
This is called a flash calculation, because if the pressure is reduced enough, the liquid changes to vapor in a “flash”
To solve any of these problems we need to identify our equations and unknowns -- Table 8.6
Material Balances
Summation of mole fractions
LVF LxVyFx iii
Remember from Process Engineering that you can write n independent material balances, if you have n components
1 ix 1 iy
More equations to be solved
Equilibrium
Vapor Pressure equations Antoine equation is probably the most
accurate of the simple equations
P
P
x
yK ii
i
ii
Simplified version assuming ideal gas
More equations to be solved
Calculate the activity coefficients Van Laar equation is simplest analytical
approach
Energy balance Adiabatic flashes
LvF HHH
Let’s do some example calculationsDew Point – Example 8.9
Estimate the boiling pressure and the composition of the vapor in equilibrium with a liquid that is:
0.1238 mol fraction ethanol remainder water
85.3 oC
First – Use Antoine’s equation to find the pure component partial pressures at this temperature
TC
BAPi
log
TPEtOH
65.222
3.155404494.8log
TPwater
02.227
462.165794917.7log
At 85.3 C, Pwater=0.5772 atm PEtOH=1.3088
SecondFind Activity Coefficients
Use the Van Laar Equation
2
2
)log(
EtOHwater
EtOHwater
xxBA
Ax
2
2
)log(
waterEtOH
waterEtOH
xxBA
Ax
Find the values of A and B for water and ethanol in Table A.7
water=1.0388EtOH=2.9235
NextCalculate the partial pressures
0waterwaterwaterwater PxP
5772.0*9235.2*8762.0waterP
atm 0.5254waterP
atm 0.4737EtOHP
Similarly for Ethanol…
atm 0.9991TotalPand…
FinallyFind the vapor phase mole fractions
Total
ii P
Py
5259.09991.0
5254.0
Total
waterwater P
Py
4741.09991.0
4737.0
EtOH
EtOHEtOH P
Py
Pressure Specified Calculations are Similar
They are harder, because the Temperature appears in the Antoine Equation
They need to be solved interatively
Calculational Steps
Guess a Temperature Calculate the Pure Component Vapor
Pressures Calculate the activity coefficients Calculate the partial pressures Calculate the total pressure, and
compare to the given pressure
Bubble Point Calculations
Mirror image of Dew Point Calculations Temperature specified calculations are
easier Pressure specified calculations require an
iterative approach
Isothermal Flash Calculations Both T and P are specified The division of mass between liquid and
vapor is unknown Consider Example 8.13
An ethanol-water mixture xaFeed=0.126 is brought to equilibrium at
1 atm 91.8 C
Estimate the vapor fraction and the mole fraction of each species in the vapor phase
Analytical Solution Find the pure component vapor
pressures Assume a value for V/F Estimate the activity coefficients Calculate the K factors Use a material balance to find the
mole fractions in the vapor and liquid phase
LxVyFx aaaF
Adiabatic Flash Calculations In addition to the equations from the
previous example, you need an energy balance
You must “guess” a temperature, then perform the calculations, and finally check to see if the energy balance requirements are met
LVF HHH
Solutions using K factor approximating tools
Activity coefficients are functions of T,P and x (the liquid composition)
Thus, K is also a function of T,P and the liquid composition
By ignoring the contribution of composition, DePreister created Figure 8.20 – an estimating tool for finding K
Colligative Properties – Another application of Raoult’s Law
Boiling Point elevation Freezing Point depression Osmosis (Chapter 14)
Predictable using Raoult’s Law
What happens as the concentration of the solvent approaches 1?
The solvent activity coefficient, , approaches 1
Thus for dilute solutions of anything the solution obeys Raoult’s law
The identity of the solute doesn’t matter, as long as it’s a dilute solution and it’s not volatile!!
Boiling Point Elevation
When the solute has a very high boiling point, the solution vapor pressure only depends on the solvent
solutesolventT PPP 0
solventsolventT PxP 0
Boiling Occurs when the vapor pressure equals the pressure of the surroundings
Example 8.15 One mole of sucrose (MW=342.3
g/mole) is dissolved in 1000 g of water
What is the vapor pressure of this solution at 100 0C?
atm 0.982atm 1*982.0 TP
Boiling won’t occur, unless you’re at an altitude above sea level
What temperature will cause boiling?
First – determine what pure component vapor pressure is required
solventsolventT PxP 0
solventPatm 0982.01
atmP solvent 018.10
From the steam tables we find T=100.51 0C – or a boiling point elevation of 0.51 0C
We can approximate the behavior of this solution at low concentrations of solute
The change in boiling point is directly proportional to the molality of the solution
mKT bboiling